MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


0026-895X/03/6406-1271-1276$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 64:1271-1276, 2003

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milligan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milligan, G.
Minireview

Constitutive Activity and Inverse Agonists of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: a Current Perspective

Graeme Milligan

Molecular Pharmacology Group, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Received June 20, 2003; accepted August 29, 2003


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 GPCRs Display Varying Levels...
 Virally Encoded GPCRs
 Constitutive Activity of GPCRs...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Over the last decade, the ability to detect agonist-independent signal transduction by G protein-coupled receptors has in turn resulted in the detection and study of ligands able to block this activity. Such ligands are generically described as inverse agonists. Considerable attention has recently been devoted to the presence and roles of endogenous antagonist/inverse agonists and the concept that inverse agonists may have specific therapeutic benefits compared with neutral antagonists.


Although now appreciated to represent a substantial over-simplification (Milligan and IJzerman, 2000Go; Strange, 2002Go), the two-state model of GPCR function (Samama et al., 1993Go) remains an extremely useful concept. Agonist ligands stabilize or increase the fraction of the active state of a GPCR such that it can interact with and activate a G protein. As such, basic thermodynamics define that there must be a finite probability that this active state also occurs in the absence of the agonist. Equally, if agonists enrich such active states, then it should be possible to identify ligands (inverse agonists) that stabilize or enrich the inactive state. With hindsight, it is easy to argue that compounds (neutral antagonists) that bind to GPCRs without altering the equilibrium between active and inactive states of the receptor are likely to be rather rare. However, early cartoons that specifically illustrated this point (Milligan et al., 1995Go) were contentious because they did not reflect pharmacological experience in which `antagonists' were common reagents. However, within such models, the scale of ligand efficacy ranged from 1 (full agonist) to -1 (full inverse agonist) and neutral antagonists were defined very precisely as possessing 0 efficacy. Heterologous expression of many GPCRs resulted in the detection of ligand-independent signal transduction that increased in an essentially linear fashion with increasing levels of GPCR expression (Tiberi and Caron, 1994Go). After clear demonstration that the constitutive activity of the GPCR was not associated with the presence of low concentrations of endogenous agonists, the ability of many traditional `antagonists' to block the constitutive activity of expressed GPCRs rapidly saw these compounds reclassified as inverse agonists (Milligan et al., 1995Go). This process continues to the present with many studies still reporting the inverse agonist activity of ligands at a wide range of both native and mutated GPCRs (Daeffler and Landry, 2000Go). Compounds with close to zero efficacy are vital tools in ligand classification because any compound with this characteristic that binds in a competitive manner will act as a functional antagonist to compounds with agonist or inverse agonist properties. They can thus be used to exclude apparent inverse agonism that derives from competition with an endogenous ligand rather than via suppression of receptor constitutive activity.


    GPCRs Display Varying Levels of Constitutive Activity
 Top
 Abstract
 GPCRs Display Varying Levels...
 Virally Encoded GPCRs
 Constitutive Activity of GPCRs...
 Conclusions
 References
 
A key question for the potential importance of inverse agonists and whether they may have inherent benefits as therapeutic agents relates to the level of constitutive activity of individual GPCRs. Many clinically important medicines have been demonstrated to behave as inverse agonists when tested against either wild-type or mutated GPCRs (Table 1). In most cases, these studies have used GPCRs expressed recombinantly in cell lines, but in certain cases, significant overexpression of GPCRs in tissues of transgenic animals has been employed to produce measurable levels of constitutive activity. Although virtually all GPCRs can be modified to display constitutive activity (Chalmers and Behan, 2002Go), many GPCRs display rather low levels of constitutive activity when expressed in recombinant systems and display greatly increased activity in the presence of an agonist. A classic example is the hamster {alpha}1b-adrenoceptor. In this GPCR, mutation of Ala293 to any other amino acid increased constitutive activity (Kjelsberg et al., 1992Go). This indicates a strong evolutionary pressure to maintain the wild-type form of the receptor in a nearly silent state. Indeed, for many GPCRs, mutational changes in the region near the the interface at the end of the third intracellular loop and the start of transmembrane helix VI result in elevated levels of constitutive activity (Pauwels and Wurch, 1998Go; Seifert and Wenzel-Seifert, 2002Go). This may relate to the well-appreciated movement of the bottom of transmembrane helix VI in response to the binding of agonist ligands (Hubbell et al., 2003Go). It is also noteworthy that mutations in this region of a number of GPCRs with endocrine ligands have been associated with relatively rare but extremely well studied, hormone-independent, human diseases (Parnot et al., 2002Go). These diseases would certainly be treated more effectively with inverse agonists compared with neutral antagonists. Enhanced levels of constitutive activity can also be produced by judicious mutation in many other locations in GPCRs (Pauwels and Wurch, 1998Go; Seifert and Wenzel-Seifert, 2002Go). Indeed, a recent random mutagenesis study employing the DOP opioid receptor used the development of constitutive activity to trace pathways of GPCR activation (Decaillot et al., 2003Go). These studies further indicate significant evolutionary pressure to maintain low levels of agonist-independent activity. In the case of rhodopsin, it is vital that levels of constitutive activity are virtually nil, otherwise the sensitivity and amplification of the visual pathway would result in permanent photobleaching. This is achieved by the covalent association of the ligand retinal in the binding pocket of the GPCR. In the 11-cis configuration, retinal holds rhodopsin in an inactive state, and this has resulted in 11-cis retinal being described as an endogenous inverse agonist (see below). Spontaneous isomerization of 11-cis retinal to the agonist all-trans retinal is an extremely rare event. However, the rapidity and efficiency of the photon-induced switch of 11-cis retinal to the all-trans configuration results in highly effective signal transduction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Are clinically effective medicines inverse agonists?

Based on sales in the USA in 2002, a significant number of the top one hundred selling medicines target GPCRs. Those that are antagonists/inverse agonists are listed along with some examples where they have been assessed as potential inverse agonists at either the wild-type or constitutively active mutants of GPCRs.

 

Except for the very specialized example of rhodopsin noted above, measurable constitutive activity can be recorded, without mutation, for virtually all GPCRs. However, in assays for constitutive activity that monitor GPCR-mediated GTPase activity in membrane fractions, the contribution of the GPCR of interest to the total high-affinity GTPase can be relatively poor. This can be improved by addition of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins to the assay (Welsby et al., 2002Go). These proteins function to accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of many heterotrimeric G proteins (Neubig and Siderovski, 2002Go). It is of little significance to the RGS whether GTP was loaded onto the G protein by an agonist-mediated or agonist-independent event. Thus, the presence of sufficient RGS increases the fraction of basal GTPase activity contributed by the constitutive activity of a GPCR and provides a greater level of activity that can be inhibited by inverse agonists and hence measured (Welsby et al., 2002Go). In intact cells, RGS proteins and other modulators of G protein function will regulate the constitutive activity of GPCRs and thus the likely therapeutic effectiveness of inverse agonists.

Closely related GPCRs frequently display significantly different levels of constitutive activity when expressed at equal levels. For example, a number of studies have noted higher levels of constitutive activity of the {beta}2-adrenoceptor compared with the {beta}1-adrenoceptor (Engelhardt et al., 2001Go; Zhou et al., 2000Go) and of the dopamine D5 receptor compared with the dopamine D1 receptor (Tiberi and Caron, 1994Go). Possible reasons for such differences are discussed later. Tissue-targeted transgenic expression of wild-type GPCRs also results in constitutive signaling, which can result in physiological function largely independent of requirement for agonist. One of the earliest examples was the generation of transgenic mice overexpressing the {beta}2-adrenoceptor to a high degree via a heart-specific promoter. Isolated atria from the transgenic mice displayed isometric tension as high in the absence of agonist as that produced by a maximal concentration of isoprenaline in atria of control mice. Basal heart rate was also much higher in the transgenic animals and not further increased by infusion of isoprenaline (Milano et al., 1994Go). Interestingly, this phenotype was not observed by transgenic expression of a constitutively active mutant of the {beta}2-adrenoceptor (Samama et al., 1997Go). This reflected the now well appreciated instability of such mutants that frequently results in low steady-state levels of expression. Treatment of the animals with {beta}-blockers that are inverse agonists up-regulated the mutant protein and uncovered the constitutively active phenotype (Samama et al., 1997Go). In contrast to examples noted earlier, a number of GPCRs do seem to have significant levels of constitutive activity when expressed in cell lines; in some cases, ligand-induced stimulation of activity is relatively small compared with the signal in the absence of ligand. Three families of GPCRs that cluster closely together in sequence similarity plots are the sphingolipid receptors, the melanocortin receptors, and the cannabinoid receptors. These tend to display high levels of agonist-independent activity, and it is noteworthy that unlike the vast majority of the rhodopsin-like class A GPCRs, they do not have the possibility to form a disulfide bond between cysteine residues positioned adjacently in extracellular loops II and III. However, it is not a simple issue to test whether lack of this disulfide bond enhances the constitutive activity of a range of GPCRs, because mutational alteration of these residues frequently prevents transport of the modified GPCR to the cell surface (Ai and Liao, 2002Go; Kuwasako et al., 2003Go).

Endogenous Inverse Agonists
For GPCRs with high constitutive activity, an intriguing idea is that endogenous antagonists/inverse agonists are produced to dampen this activity. There is one system that provides well-documented examples of such a phenomenon. This is the family of melanocortin receptors (Adan and Kas, 2003Go). Of the melanocortin receptors, the MC1 receptor is expressed in melanophores in the skin. In mice, {alpha}-MSH acts as agonist at the MC1 receptor and via stimulation of cAMP levels promotes production of melanin and dark coat color. The polypeptide ligand agouti acts as an antagonist at this receptor and this results in yellow coat color (Wolff, 2003Go). The MC3 and MC4 receptors are expressed in the brain and play key roles in obesity and cachexia (Goodfellow and Saunders, 2003Go; Zimanyi and Pelleymounter, 2003Go). Here, {alpha}-MSH acts as agonist to regulate feeding, whereas agouti or agouti-related peptide (AGRP) can act as functional antagonists. However, AGRP and smaller fragments of this ligand function as endogenously produced inverse agonists (Haskell-Luevano and Monck, 2001Go; Nijenhuis et al., 2001Go). After heterologous expression of the human MC4 receptor, both basal and forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was inhibited by the 83 to 132 fragment of AGRP, and the extent of inhibition was both dependent on the level of MC4 receptor expression and not observed in cells that did not express the receptor. Importantly, the small molecule SHU9119 seems to be a nearly neutral antagonist for this receptor and is able to block both the agonist effect of {alpha}-MSH and the inverse agonist effect of AGRP 83-132 (Nijenhuis et al., 2001Go). Ectopic overexpression of AGRP in mice results in an obese phenotype, presumably by interacting with the MC3/MC4, whereas ectopic over-expression of agouti results in both an obese phenotype and light coat color via the added effect at the MC1 receptor. Although the numbers are relatively small, a range of nonsynonomous single nucleotide polymorphisms that result in single amino acid alterations in the MC4 receptor have been reported in morbidly obese persons (Vaisse et al., 2000Go; Dubern et al., 2001Go). When expressed in heterologous systems, many of these mutants are poorly delivered to the cell surface (Lubrano-Berthelier et al., 2003Go; Nijenhuis et al., 2003Go; Yeo et al., 2003Go). It remains to be explored whether these alterations produce a distinct modulation of constitutive signal transduction. Because malfunction of the MC4 receptor may be implicated in some severe genetically controlled examples of obesity, it is also interesting to note than a correlation has been observed between a polymorphic variation in AGRP and the development of anorexia nervosa (Lu, 2001Go; Vink et al., 2001Go). Poor suppression of constitutive MC4 receptor signaling and function by a malfunctional or poorly expressed form of AGRP would be consistent with poor food intake, but more studies need to be performed to investigate the implications of such studies. Although there is currently no evidence to support the idea, it may be worthwhile to examine whether endogenous antagonists/inverse agonists are produced that act at the sphingolipid and/or cannabinoid receptors.


    Virally Encoded GPCRs
 Top
 Abstract
 GPCRs Display Varying Levels...
 Virally Encoded GPCRs
 Constitutive Activity of GPCRs...
 Conclusions
 References
 
A number of viruses encode combinations of chemokine-like GPCRs and GPCR ligands in their genome (Rosenkilde et al., 2001Go). These include ORF74 of human herpes virus-8 (also called Kaposi sarcoma herpes virus) and US28 and US33, both encoded by human cytomegalovirus. Presumably, these were pirated from mammalian cells infected by the ancestors of these viruses. ORF74 displays homology to the CXCR2 receptor and was shown to possess constitutive activity when expressed in heterologous systems. Furthermore, ORF74 transfected NIH-3T3 cells can induced tumor formation in nude mice (Bais et al., 1998Go) and mice transgenic for ORF74 expression develop Kaposi sarcoma-like symptoms (Yang et al., 2000Go; Guo et al., 2003Go). The majority of chemokine receptors can be regulated by a range of chemokine ligands; indeed, in certain cases, chemokines seem to act as endogenous inverse agonists of these virally encoded GPCRs. Both human interferon-{gamma}-inducible protein 10 and stromal cell-derived factor-1{alpha} have been shown to inhibit the constitutive signaling of ORF74 (Rosenkilde et al., 1999Go). The US28 gene product is distantly related to the human CCR5 and CXCR4 chemokine receptors. Like these, US28 allows infection of CD4-positive human cell lines by primary isolates of HIV-1 and HIV-2 (Pleskoff et al., 1997Go). Both the US28 and US33 GPCRs also display constitutive activity when expressed in heterologous systems, and a nonpeptidergic ligand, VUF2274, has been shown to act as a relatively low-affinity inverse agonist of US28 without affecting the constitutive activity of either US33 or ORF74 (Casarosa et al., 2003Go). This is of considerable interest because VUF2274 was also shown to be able to partially inhibit HIV-1 entry into US28-expressing, CD4-positive cells (Casarosa et al., 2003Go). This viral GPCR demonstrates high levels of constitutive endocytosis (Waldhoer et al., 2003Go) but studies with variants of US28 lacking elements of the C-terminal tail have dissociated constitutive internalization and constitutive signaling (Waldhoer et al., 2003Go), implying that high levels of constitutive activity does not directly induce endocytosis. This might have been expected to be the case if the constitutive activity were associated with ligand-independent-phosphorylation and translocation of {beta}-arrestins. However, there are potentially conflicting recent data on the likely importance of interactions with {beta}-arrestins in the constitutive internalization of this GPCR (Fraile-Ramos et al., 2003Go; Miller et al., 2003Go).


    Constitutive Activity of GPCRs in Native Systems
 Top
 Abstract
 GPCRs Display Varying Levels...
 Virally Encoded GPCRs
 Constitutive Activity of GPCRs...
 Conclusions
 References
 
As noted above, in many situations, the inability to clearly exclude a contribution from endogenous ligands to basal activity has made unambiguous scoring of GPCR constitutive activity in native systems difficult. As such, a thorny issue is whether significant levels of constitutive activity are seen only in recombinant systems in which GPCR expression levels can be manipulated and are often relatively high. Early data to suggest that this is not the explanation in all cases has been reviewed elegantly and extensively by de Ligt et al. (2000Go).

The availability of ligands with close to zero efficacy is required to allow detailed study in native tissues. After expression of splice variants of the rat histamine H3 receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells, both histamine and imetit were able to elevate [3H]arachidonic acid release, whereas thioperamide and a range of other histamine H3 blockers were able to inhibit basal release. By contrast, proxyfan was without effect. Importantly, the effects of both agonists and inverse agonists were blocked by proxyfan in a concentration-dependent fashion (Morisset et al., 2000Go). Based on this definition of proxyfan as a neutral antagonist for the rat histamine H3 receptor, this compound was used to examine the relevance of constitutive activity of this receptor on either autoreceptor-mediated [3H]histamine release or basal and ligand-regulated guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding in rat brain membranes. In both assays, proxyfan reversed both the agonist effects of imetit and the inverse agonist effects of thioperamide without producing significant effects itself (Morisset et al., 2000Go). This remains one of the most impressive examples of constitutive activity in a native setting and is consistent with significant tonic regulation via ligand-independent activity of a GPCR. In a clinical content, these results have led to the suggestion that inverse agonists might be preferred to neutral antagonists as `cognitive enhancers' (Schwartz et al., 2003Go).

Most studies on constitutive activity and inverse agonism continue to rely on heterologous expression of GPCRs. A further complication for the use of transfected cell systems as a means to gauge the potential for constitutive activity of GPCRs in native tissues is that it is now clear that GPCRs generally do not exist in isolation but may have (many) potential binding partners. Interactions between intracellular regions of GPCRs, particularly the C-terminal tail (Bockaert et al., 2003Go), and other polypeptides has become an intensely studied topic (Kreienkamp, 2002Go; Premont and Hall, 2002Go). In many cases, such interactions serve to regulate the cellular location, scaffolding and/or trafficking of a GPCR. Such interactions can, however, also regulate the degree of constitutive activity observed. If the heterologous cell system selected for expression of a GPCR lacks expression of a specific interacting protein, this can modulate the observed degree of constitutive activity. For example, when expressing either the mGluR 1a or mGluR 5 receptor in HEK293 cells, Fagni and colleagues observed constitutive inositol phosphate generation (Ango et al., 2001Go). This was not observed, however, in neurons. Although differences in expression levels in the two host systems might have provided a trivial explanation for these findings, a more interesting one emerged. The C-terminal tail of the mGluR1a and mGluR 5 but not other members of this GPCR subfamily family contain consensus regions for the binding of homer proteins. Homer proteins have been particularly well studied owing to their capacity to provide a bridge between cell surface receptors and the cortical actin system of the cytoskeleton and thus anchor receptors in specific locations (e.g., the synapse) (Thomas, 2002Go). Cultured cerebellar granule cells were shown to express homer 3 but not other members of the homer family (Ango et al., 2001Go). After treatment of such cells with antisense oligonucleotides targeting homer 3 expression, basal inositol phosphate production increased. This was unaffected by addition of the mGluR1 neutral antagonist CPCCOEt but reversed by addition of the inverse agonist BAY36. Such constitutive activity of the mGluR1a receptor was not uncovered when cells were treated with a scrambled oligonucleotide sequence based on the effective antisense (Agno et al., 2001).

Are There Cellular Constraints on Constitutive Activity of GPCRs?
As detailed above, closely related GPCR pairs, such as the dopamine D1 and D5 receptors and the {beta}1- and {beta}2-adrenoceptors, have been shown to display significantly different extents of constitutive activity. Although clearly not the only element contributing to the differences in the extent of constitutive activity of the dopamine D1 and D5 receptors, the C-terminal tail plays an important role (Tumova et al., 2003Go). Sequence variation between these two GPCRs is relatively high in this region. Elegant recent studies have demonstrated direct interactions between the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and the dopamine D1 receptor but not the dopamine D5 receptor (Lee et al., 2002Go) and between the GABA-A receptor and the dopamine D5 receptor but not the dopamine D1 receptor (Liu et al., 2000Go). These protein-protein interactions are defined by elements within the C-terminal tail of the GPCRs. Although effects of these interactions on constitutive activity were not explored, it would not be surprising if it were modulated. The ongoing revolution in proteomics is uncovering many prospective interactions between GPCRs and other polypeptides. Forms of the 5-hydroxytryptamine 5-HT2C receptor have been extensively studied as model GPCRs. These display significant constitutive activity at which a series of therapeutically relevant ligands have been shown to act as inverse agonists in both heterologous and native systems (Barker et al., 1994Go; Herrick-Davis et al., 2000Go; Rauser et al., 2001Go) (see also Table 1). However, proteomic detection of polypeptides that interact with the 5-HT2C receptor has identified at least 13 distinct proteins (Becamel et al., 2002Go), and it will be interesting to see how these interactions alter agonist-independent signal transduction. The multi-PDZ domain-containing protein MUPP-1 is one of these (Becamel et al., 2001Go) and elimination of the PDZ binding domain at the C-terminal tail of the 5-HT2C receptor alters phosphorylation and resensitization of this receptor (Backstrom et al., 2000Go). Recently, an interaction between the MOP1 and MOP1A variants of the human µ-opioid receptor and the intermediate filament binding protein periplakin was shown to disrupt agonist activation of G protein (Feng et al., 2003Go). This and similar protein-protein interactions may also limit constitutive activity. The application of antisense and particularly small interfering RNA based reagents (Chi et al., 2003Go; Semizarov et al., 2003Go) offers an attractive and selective means to `knock-down' expression levels of GPCR interacting proteins in native tissues to explore whether this alters the extent of constitutive activity.

Signaling proteins are not evenly and randomly distributed at the plasma membrane of cells. Many, including the heterotrimeric G proteins, are concentrated selectivity in specialized regions known as lipid rafts (Foster et al., 2003Go). Although the distribution of GPCRs is in general significantly less clear, in rat ventricular myocytes, it has been reported that the {beta}2-adrenoceptor is significantly more concentrated in such rafts than the coexpressed {beta}1-adrenoceptor (Rybin et al., 2000Go). A range of other signaling proteins display differential distribution in myocytes (Steinberg and Brunton, 2001Go), and this may further contribute to the differential function of these two adrenoceptors. There are varying views on whether concentration of G proteins in lipid rafts is designed to enhance or restrict their signaling activity. However, one obvious scenario is that the higher constitutive activity of the {beta}2-adrenoceptor compared with the {beta}1-adrenoceptor may simply reflect greater access to G proteins and effector enzymes. Potentially in support of such a model are data generated by comparison of fusion proteins between both the {beta}1- and the {beta}2-adrenoceptor, with the long isoform of Gs{alpha} (Wenzel-Seifert et al., 2002Go). Here, when the ratio of GPCR to G protein is fixed, both GPCRs displayed similar characteristics of constitutive activity and indeed the {beta}1-adrenoceptor was the more effective at activating the G protein. Clearly, a great deal more information remains to be gleaned about the role of protein-protein interactions and cellular targeting to membrane subdomains in the generation of receptor constitutive activity and thus the potential practical importance of inverse agonists in therapeutic and pathophysiological settings.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 GPCRs Display Varying Levels...
 Virally Encoded GPCRs
 Constitutive Activity of GPCRs...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Partially because of the relative simplicity of the assays, `antagonist' ligands are now routinely assessed for inverse agonism. Many clinically effective medicines can be shown to be inverse agonists. However, the bulk of such studies still rely on heterologous expression of GPCRs in cell lines, and it remains unclear whether inverse agonists offer inherent advantages over neutral antagonists in the vast majority of clinical scenarios, or indeed whether the inverse agonism of some medicines contributes significantly to their effectiveness. Unraveling this issue remains a key challenge. The complexity of signal transduction scaffolds and the varying distribution of GPCR interacting proteins implies that simple heterologous expression systems may not provide a useful assessment of the significance of inverse agonism in a clinical setting.


    Acknowledgements
 
I thank all the participants of the Esteve Foundation meeting on inverse agonism held in S'Agaro, Spain, 3-6 October 2002 for their insights into this topic.


    Footnotes
 
This work is based on a presentation to the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics meeting in San Diego on 12 April 2003.

ABBREVIATIONS: GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; RGS, regulator of G protein signaling; MSH, melanocyte-stimulating hormone; AGRP, agouti-related peptide; mGluR, metabotropic glutamate receptor; PDZ, postsynaptic density 95/disc-large/ZO-1.

Address correspondence to: Graeme Milligan, Davidson Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK. E-mail: g.milligan{at}bio.gla.ac.uk


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 GPCRs Display Varying Levels...
 Virally Encoded GPCRs
 Constitutive Activity of GPCRs...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Adan RAH and Kas MJH (2003) Inverse agonism gains weight. Trends Pharmacol Sci 24: 315-321.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ai LS and Liao F (2002) Mutating the four extracellular cysteines in the chemokine receptor CCR6 reveals their differing roles in receptor trafficking, ligand binding and signaling. Biochemistry 41: 8332-8341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Alewijnse AE, Smit MJ, Hoffmann M, Verzijl D, Timmerman H, and Leurs R (1998) Constitutive activity and structural instability of the wild-type human H2 receptor. J Neurochem 71: 799-807.[Medline]

Ango F, Prezeau L, Muller T, Tu JC, Xiao B, Worley PF, Pin JP, Bockaert J, and Fagni L (2001) Agonist-independent activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors by the intracellular protein Homer. Nature (Lond) 411: 962-965.[CrossRef][Medline]

Backstrom JR, Price RD, Reasoner DT, and Sanders-Bush E (2000) Deletion of the serotonin 5-HT2C receptor PDZ recognition motif prevents receptor phosphorylation and delays resensitization of receptor responses. J Biol Chem 275: 23620-23626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bais C, Santomasso B, Coso O, Arvanitakis L, Raaka EG, Gutkind JS, Asch AS, Cesarman E, Gershengorn MC, Mesri EA, et al. (1998) G-protein-coupled receptor of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus is a viral oncogene and angiogenesis activator. Nature (Lond) 391: 86-89.[CrossRef][Medline]

Barker EL, Westphal RS, Schmidt D, and Sanders-Bush E (1994) Constitutively active 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptors reveal novel inverse agonist activity of receptor ligands. J Biol Chem 269: 11687-11690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Becamel C, Alonso G, Galeotti N, Demey E, Jouin P, Ullmer C, Dumuis A, Bockaert J, and Marin P (2002) Synaptic multiprotein complexes associated with 5-HT(2C) receptors: a proteomic approach. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 21: 2332-2342.[CrossRef][Medline]

Becamel C, Figge A, Poliak S, Dumuis A, Peles E, Bockaert J, Lubbert H, and Ullmer C (2001) Interaction of serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine type 2C receptors with PDZ10 of the multi-PDZ domain protein MUPP1. J Biol Chem 276: 12974-12982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bockaert J, Marin P, Dumuis A, and Fagni L (2003) The `magic tail' of G protein-coupled receptors: an anchorage for functional protein networks. FEBS Lett 546: 65-72.[CrossRef][Medline]

Casarosa P, Menge WM, Minisini R, Otto C, van Heteren J, Jongejan A, Timmerman H, Moepps B, Kirchhoff F, Mertens T, et al. (2003) Identification of the first nonpeptidergic inverse agonist for a constitutively active viral-encoded G protein-coupled receptor. J Biol Chem 278: 5172-5178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chalmers DT and Behan DP (2002) The use of constitutively active GPCRs in drug discovery and functional genomics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1: 599-608.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chi JT, Chang HY, Wang NN, Chang DS, Dunphy N, and Brown PO (2003) Genome-wide view of gene silencing by small interfering RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6343-6346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Conley PB and Delaney SM (2003) Scientific and therapeutic insights into the role of the platelet P2Y12 receptor in thrombosis. Curr Opin Hematol 10: 333-338.[CrossRef][Medline]

de Ligt RA, Kourounakis AP, IJzerman AP (2000) Inverse agonism at G protein-coupled receptors: (patho)physiological relevance and implications for drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 130: 1-12.[CrossRef][Medline]

Daeffler L and Landry Y (2000) Inverse agonism at heptahelical receptors: concept, experimental approach and therapeutic potential. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 14: 73-87.[Medline]

Decaillot FM, Befort K, Filliol D, Yue SY, Walker P, and Kieffer BL (2003) Opioid receptor random mutagenesis reveals a mechanisms for G protein-coupled receptor activation. Nature (Lond) Structural Biol 10: 629-636.

Dubern B, Clement K, Pelloux V, Froguel P, Girardet JP, Guy-Grand B, and Tounian P (2001) Mutational analysis of melanocortin-4 receptor, agouti-related protein and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone genes in severely obese children. J Pediatr 139: 204-209.[CrossRef][Medline]

Engelhardt S, Grimmer Y, Fan GH, and Lohse MJ (2001) Constitutive activity of the human {beta}1-adrenergic receptor in {beta}1-receptor transgenic mice. Mol Pharmacol 60: 712-717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feng GJ, Kellett E, Scorer CA, Wilde J, White JH, and Milligan G (2003) Selective interactions between helix VIII of the human µ opioid receptors and the C terminus of periplakin disrupt G protein activation. J Biol Chem 278: 33400-33407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Foster LJ, De Hoog CL, and Mann M (2003) Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 5813-5818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fraile-Ramos A, Kohout TA, Waldhoer M, and Marsh M (2003) Endocytosis of the viral chemokine receptor US28 does not require beta-arrestins but is dependent on the clathrin-mediated pathway. Traffic 4: 243-253.[Medline]

Goodfellow VS and Saunders J (2003) The melanocortin system and its role in obesity and cachexia. Curr Top Med Chem 3: 855-883.[CrossRef][Medline]

Groblewski T, Maigret B, Larguier R, Lombard C, Bonnafous JC, and Marie J (1997) Mutation of Asn111 in the third transmembrane domain of the AT1A angiotensin II receptor induces its constitutive activation. J Biol Chem 272: 1822-1826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Guo HG, Sadowska M, Reid W, Tschachler E, Hayward G, and Reitz M (2003) Kaposi's sarcoma-like tumors in a human herpesvirus 8 ORF74 transgenic mouse. J Virol 77: 2631-2639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haskell-Luevano C and Monck EK (2001) Agouti-related protein functions as an inverse agonist at a constitutively active brain melanocortin-4 receptor. Regul Pept 99: 1-7.[CrossRef][Medline]

Herrick-Davis K, Grinde E, and Teitler M (2000) Inverse agonist activity of atypical antipsychotic drugs at human 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295: 226-232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hubbell WL, Altenbach C, Hubbell CM, and Khorana HG (2003) Rhodopsin structure, dynamics, and activation: a perspective from crystallography, site-directed spin labeling, sulfhydryl reactivity and disulfide cross-linking. Adv Protein Chem 63: 243-290.[Medline]

Kjelsberg MA, Cotecchia S, Ostrowski J, Caron MG, and Lefkowitz RJ (1992) Constitutive activation of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor by all amino acid substitutions at a single site. Evidence for a region which constrains receptor activation. J Biol Chem 267: 1430-1433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kreienkamp HJ (2002) Organisation of G-protein-coupled receptor signalling complexes by scaffolding proteins. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2: 581-586.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kuwasako K, Kitamura K, Uemura T, Nagoshi Y, Kato J, and Eto T (2003) The function of extracellular cysteines in the human adrenomedullin receptor. Hypertens Res 26 Suppl: S25-31.

Lee FJ, Xue S, Pei L, Vukusic B, Chery N, Wang Y, Wang YT, Niznik HB, Yu XM, and Liu F (2002) Dual regulation of NMDA receptor functions by direct protein-protein interactions with the dopamine D1 receptor. Cell 111: 219-230.[CrossRef][Medline]

Leurs R, Church MK, and Taglialatela M (2002) H1-antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti-inflammatory actions and cardiac effects. Clin Exp Allergy 32: 489-498.[CrossRef][Medline]

Levin MC, Marullo S, Muntaner O, Andersson B, and Magnusson Y (2002) The myocardium-protective Gly-49 variant of the {beta}1-adrenergic receptor exhibits constitutive activity and increased desensitization and down-regulation. J Biol Chem 277: 30429-30435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu F, Wan Q, Pristupa ZB, Yu XM, Wang YT, and Niznik HB (2000) Direct protein-protein coupling enables cross-talk between dopamine D5 and gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors. Nature (Lond) 403: 274-280.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lu XY (2001) Role of central melanocortin signaling in eating disorders. Psychopharmacol Bull 35: 45-65.[Medline]

Lubrano-Berthelier C, Durand E, Dubern B, Shapiro A, Dazin P, Weill J, Ferron C, Froguel P, and Vaisse C (2003) Intracellular retention is a common characteristic of childhood obesity-associated MC4R mutations. Hum Mol Genet 12: 145-153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Milano CA, Allen LF, Rockman HA, Dolber PC, McMinn TR, Chien KR, Johnson TD, Bond RA, and Lefkowitz RJ (1994) Enhanced myocardial function in transgenic mice overexpressing the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Science (Wash DC) 264: 582-586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller WE, Houtz DA, Nelson CD, Kolattukudy PE, and Lefkowitz RJ (2003) GRK phosphorylation and {beta} arrestin recruitment regulate the constitutive signaling activity of the human cytomegalovirus US28 GPCR. J Biol Chem 278: 21663-21671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Milligan G and IJzerman AP (2000) Stochastic multidimensional hypercubes and inverse agonism. Trends Pharmacol Sci 21: 362-363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Milligan G, Bond RA, and Lee M (1995) Inverse agonism: pharmacological curiosity or potential therapeutic strategy? Trends Pharmacol Sci 16: 10-13.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miserey-Lenkei S, Parnot C, Bardin S, Corvol P, and Clauser E (2002) Constitutive internalization of constitutively active agiotensin II AT(1A) receptor mutants is blocked by inverse agonists. J Biol Chem 277: 5891-5901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morisset S, Rouleau A, Ligneau X, Gbahou F, Tardivel-Lacombe J, Stark H, Schunack W, Ganellin CR, Schwartz JC, and Arrang JM (2000) High constitutive activity of native H3 receptors regulates histamine neurons in brain. Nature (Lond) 408: 860-864.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nijenhuis WA, Garner KM, VanRozen RJ, and Adan RA (2003) Poor cell surface expression of human melanocortin-4 receptor mutations associated with obesity. J Biol Chem 278: 22939-22945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nijenhuis WA, Oosterom J, and Adan RA (2001) AgRP(83-132) acts as an inverse agonist on the human-melanocortin-4 receptor. Mol Endocrinol 15: 164-171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Neubig RR and Siderovski DP (2002) Regulators of G-protein signalling as new central nervous system drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1: 187-197.[CrossRef][Medline]

Parnot C, Miserey-Lenkei S, Bardin S, Corvol P, and Clauser E (2002) Lessons from constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab 13: 336-343.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pauwels PJ and Wurch T (1998) Review: amino acid domains involved in constitutive activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Mol Neurobiol 17: 109-135.[Medline]

Pleskoff O, Treboute C, Brelot A, Heveker N, Seman M, and Alizon M (1997) Identification of a chemokine receptor encoded by human cytomegalovirus as a cofactor for HIV-1 entry. Science (Wash DC) 276: 1874-1878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Premont RT and Hall RA (2002) Identification of novel G protein-coupled receptor-interacting proteins. Methods Enzymol 343: 611-621.[Medline]

Rauser L, Savage JE, Meltzer HY, and Roth BL (2001) Inverse agonist actions of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs at the human 5-hydroxytryptamine2C receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 299: 83-89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosenkilde MM, Kledal TN, Brauner-Osborne H, and Schwartz TW (1999) Agonists and inverse agonists for the herpesvirus 8-encoded constitutively active seven-transmembrane oncogene product, ORF-74. J Biol Chem 274: 956-961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosenkilde MM, Waldhoer M, Luttichau HR, and Schwartz TW (2001) Virally encoded 7TM receptors. Oncogene 20: 1582-1593.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rybin VO, Xu X, Lisanti MP, and Steinberg SF (2000) Differential targeting of beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes and adenylyl cyclase to cardiomyocyte caveolae. A mechanism to functionally regulate the cAMP signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 275: 41447-41457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Samama P, Bond RA, Rockman HA, Milano CA, and Lefkowitz RJ (1997) Ligand-induced overexpression of a constitutively active beta2-adrenergic receptor: pharmacological creation of a phenotype in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 137-141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Samama P, Cotecchia S, Costa T, and Lefkowitz RJ (1993) A mutation-induced activated state of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Extending the ternary complex model. J Biol Chem 268: 4625-4636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schwartz JC, Morisset S, Rouleau A, Ligneau X, Gbahou F, Tardivel-Lacombe J, Stark H, Schunack W, Ganellin CR, and Arrang JM (2003) Therapeutic implications of constitutive activity of receptors: the example of the histamine H3 receptor. J Neural Trasm Suppl 64: 1-16.

Seifert R and Wenzel-Seifert K (2002) Constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors: cause of disease and common property of wild-type receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 366: 381-416.[CrossRef][Medline]

Semizarov D, Frost L, Sarthy A, Kroeger P, Halbert DN, and Fesik SW (2003) Specificity of short interfering RNA determined through gene expression signatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6347-6352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Steinberg SF and Brunton LL (2001) Compartmentation of G protein-coupled signaling pathways in cardiac myocytes. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41: 751-773.[CrossRef][Medline]

Strange PG (2002) Mechanisms of inverse agonism at G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23: 89-95.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thomas U (2002) Modulation of synaptic signalling complexes by Homer proteins. J Neurochem 81: 407-413.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tiberi M and Caron MG (1994) High agonist-independent activity is a distinguishing feature of the dopamine D1B receptor subtype. J Biol Chem 269: 27925-27931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tumova K, Iwasiow RM, and Tiberi M (2003) Insight into the mechanism of dopamine D1-like receptor activation. Evidence for a molecular interplay between the third extracellular loop and the cytoplasmic tail. J Biol Chem 278: 8146-8153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vaisse C, Clement K, Durand E, Hercberg S, Guy-Grand B, and Froguel P (2000) Melanocortin-4 receptor mutations are a frequent and heterogeneous cause of morbid obesity. J Clin Investig 106: 253-262.[Medline]

Vanhauwe JF, Fraeyman N, Francken BJ, Luyten WH, and Leysen JE (1999) Comparison of the ligand binding and signaling properties of human dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290: 908-916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vink T, Hinney A, van Elburg AA, van Goozen SH, Sandkuijl LA, Sinke RJ, Herpertz-Dahlmann BM, Hebebrand J, Remschmidt H, van Engeland H, et al. (2001) Association between an agouti-related protein gene polymorphism and anorexia nervosa. Mol Psychiatry 6: 325-328.[CrossRef][Medline]

Waldhoer M, Casarosa P, Rosenkilde MM, Smit MJ, Leurs R, Whistler JL, and Schwartz TW (2003) The carboxyl terminus of human cytomegalovirus-encoded 7 transmembrane receptor US28 camouflages agonism by nediating constitutive endocytosis. J Biol Chem 278: 19473-19482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Welsby PJ, Kellett E, Wilkinson G, and Milligan G (2002) Enhanced detection of receptor constitutive activity in the presence of regulators of G protein signalling: applications to the detection and analysis of inverse agonists and low efficacy partial agonists. Mol Pharmacol 61: 1211-1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wenzel-Seifert K, Liu HY, and Seifert R (2002) Similarities and differences in the coupling of human beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptors to Gs(alpha) splice variants. Biochem Pharmacol 64: 9-20.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wolff GL (2003) Regulation of yellow pigment formation in mice: a historical perspective. Pigment Cell Res 16: 2-15.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yang TY, Chen SC, Leach MW, Manfra D, Homey B, Wiekowski M, Sullivan L, Jenh CH, Narula SK, Chensue SW, et al. (2000) Transgenic expression of the chemokine receptor encoded by human herpesvirus 8 induces an angioproliferative disease resembling Kaposi's sarcoma. J Exp Med 191: 445-454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yeo GS, Lank EJ, Farooqi IS, Keogh J, Challis BG, and O'Rahilly S (2003) Mutations in the human melanocortin-4 receptor gene associated with severe familial obesity disrupts receptor function through multiple molecular mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 12: 561-574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zimanyi IA and Pelleymounter MA (2003) The role of melanocortin peptides and receptors in regulation of energy balance. Curr Pharm Des 9: 627-641.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhou YY, Yang D, Zhu WZ, Zhang SJ, Wang DJ, Rohrer DK, Devic E, Kobilka BK, Lakatta EG, Cheng H, et al. (2000) Spontaneous activation of {beta}2-but not {beta}1-adrenoceptors expressed in cardiac myocytes from {beta}1{beta}2 double knockout mice. Mol Pharmacol 58: 887-894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Canals and G. Milligan
Constitutive Activity of the Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Regulates the Function of Co-expressed Mu Opioid Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11424 - 11434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
G. Bongers, K. M. Krueger, T. R. Miller, J. L. Baranowski, B. R. Estvander, D. G. Witte, M. I. Strakhova, P. van Meer, R. A. Bakker, M. D. Cowart, et al.
An 80-Amino Acid Deletion in the Third Intracellular Loop of a Naturally Occurring Human Histamine H3 Isoform Confers Pharmacological Differences and Constitutive Activity
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2007; 323(3): 888 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. H. Li, S.-J. Han, F. F. Hamdan, S.-K. Kim, K. A. Jacobson, L. M. Bloodworth, X. Zhang, and J. Wess
Distinct Structural Changes in a G Protein-coupled Receptor Caused by Different Classes of Agonist Ligands
J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26284 - 26293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. R. Neubig
Missing Links: Mechanisms of Protean Agonism
Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 1200 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Makita, J. Sato, K. Manaka, Y. Shoji, A. Oishi, M. Hashimoto, T. Fujita, and T. Iiri
An acquired hypocalciuric hypercalcemia autoantibody induces allosteric transition among active human Ca-sensing receptor conformations
PNAS, March 27, 2007; 104(13): 5443 - 5448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J.-C. Martel, A.-M. Ormiere, N. Leduc, M.-B. Assie, D. Cussac, and A. Newman-Tancredi
Native Rat Hippocampal 5-HT1A Receptors Show Constitutive Activity
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 638 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
X. Hua, M. Kovarova, K. D. Chason, M. Nguyen, B. H. Koller, and S. L. Tilley
Enhanced mast cell activation in mice deficient in the A2b adenosine receptor
J. Exp. Med., January 22, 2007; 204(1): 117 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Galandrin and M. Bouvier
Distinct Signaling Profiles of beta1 and beta2 Adrenergic Receptor Ligands toward Adenylyl Cyclase and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Reveals the Pluridimensionality of Efficacy
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1575 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. R. Dowling, J. M. Willets, D. C. Budd, S. J. Charlton, S. R. Nahorski, and R. A. J. Challiss
A Single Point Mutation (N514Y) in the Human M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Reveals Differences in the Properties of Antagonists: Evidence for Differential Inverse Agonism
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1134 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Leterrier, J. Laine, M. Darmon, H. Boudin, J. Rossier, and Z. Lenkei
Constitutive activation drives compartment-selective endocytosis and axonal targeting of type 1 cannabinoid receptors.
J. Neurosci., March 22, 2006; 26(12): 3141 - 3153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Z. Ding, S. Kim, and S. P. Kunapuli
Identification of a Potent Inverse Agonist at a Constitutively Active Mutant of Human P2Y12 Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2006; 69(1): 338 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. M Mehlmann
Stops and starts in mammalian oocytes: recent advances in understanding the regulation of meiotic arrest and oocyte maturation
Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 791 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
M. L. Toews and D. B. Bylund
Pharmacologic Principles for Combination Therapy
Proceedings of the ATS, November 1, 2005; 2(4): 282 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
L. Parhamifar, B. Jeppsson, and A. Sjolander
Activation of cPLA2 is required for leukotriene D4-induced proliferation in colon cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1988 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. R. Hawtin
Charged Residues of the Conserved DRY Triplet of the Vasopressin V1a Receptor Provide Molecular Determinants for Cell Surface Delivery and Internalization
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2005; 68(4): 1172 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]