|
|
|
|
Children's Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research, Iron Metabolism and Chelation Program, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Received June 23, 2003; accepted October 1, 2003
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Under physiological conditions, iron is delivered to cells via the binding of transferrin (Tf) to the TfR1 located on the cell membrane. The Tf-TfR1 complex is internalized into the cell via receptor-mediated endocytosis (Kwok and Richardson, 2002b
). A decrease in endosomal pH releases the iron from Tf. The iron is then transported across the membrane via the divalent metal ion transporter 1 and enters the intracellular labile iron pool (Kwok and Richardson, 2002b
). From this latter compartment, iron can be incorporated into heme and nonheme iron-containing proteins or stored in the protein ferritin (Kwok and Richardson, 2002b
). Ferritin consists of 24 subunits of two types, namely heavy and light chains. These subunits are symmetrically organized, generating a cavity within the protein for iron storage (Harrison and Arosio, 1996
).
We previously demonstrated that after iron uptake into cells, iron is initially incorporated into ferritin, followed by iron mobilization from ferritin and its redistribution to other cellular compartments (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). This supports the theory that ferritin is not merely an iron-storage molecule, but it can act as an intermediate in iron transport (Speyer and Fielding, 1979
). Currently, little is understood regarding the physiological mechanisms of ferritin-iron mobilization. In vitro studies demonstrated that biological reductants including reduced flavins (Funk et al., 1985
), superoxide (Bolann and Ulvik, 1987
), and ascorbate (Bienfait and Van der Briel, 1980
), can promote iron release from ferritin. Studies using isolated ferritin showed that substitution of conserved amino acid residues in the 3-fold axes enhances iron release from ferritin (Jin et al., 2001
). In addition, structural changes in ferritin may open channels to facilitate iron mobilization (Funk et al., 1985
). However, the physiological significance of these experiments on purified ferritin is uncertain. Others have suggested that ferritin-iron release necessitates the degradation of ferritin within lysosomes (Roberts and Bomford, 1988
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
; Persson et al., 2001
). Lysosomes are acidic organelles that contain hydrolases for the degradation and turnover of intracellular molecules (Pillay et al., 2002
). Indeed, studies using cultured cells have demonstrated lysosomal degradation of ferritin (Hernandez-Yago et al., 1980
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
).
We showed previously in neoplastic and myocardial cells that anthracyclines inhibit iron mobilization from ferritin, resulting in marked accumulation of ferritin-iron (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). This consequently inhibited iron redistribution from ferritin to other vital iron-containing pathways. Interestingly, anthracyclines can localize in lysosomes (Hurwitz et al., 1997
) and disrupt lysosomal morphology and enzyme activity (Singal et al., 1985
). However, the possibility that lysosomes are cellular targets of anthracyclines, resulting in the inhibition of lysosome-mediated ferritin degradation and the redistribution of iron to vital cellular processes, has not been investigated.
In the present study we showed that inhibition of energy generation or protein synthesis inhibits the ferritin-iron mobilization pathway. Importantly, a range of lysosomal enzyme inhibitors, lysosomotropic agents, and proteasomal inhibitors resulted in marked ferritin-iron accumulation that was comparable with that found using the anthracycline doxorubicin (DOX). These data provide further evidence of a mechanism involving lysosomes in the degradation of ferritin that is required for the release and redistribution of metabolically useful iron. The inhibition of iron redistribution to other compartments may have detrimental effects on vital iron-dependent processes, and it is possible that the lysosomal degradation pathway represents a potential target for anthracycline cytotoxicity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture. Human SK-Mel-28 melanoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Briefly, cells were grown in Eagle's modified minimum essential medium (MEM) (Invitrogen, Sydney, Australia) containing 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen), 1% nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen), 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), 100 U/ml penicillin (Invitrogen), and 0.28 µg/ml Fungizone (Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Montréal, Canada). Cells were cultured in an incubator (Thermo Forma, Marietta, OH) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air and subcultured as described previously (Richardson and Baker, 1990
). Cellular growth and viability were assessed by phase-contrast microscopy and Trypan blue staining. The SK-Mel-28 cell type was used as the experimental model to study ferritin-iron accumulation because our previous investigation demonstrated that the same effect was observed with cardiomyocytes and a variety of tumor cell lines (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
).
Preparation of 59Fe-Transferrin. Human apotransferrin (Sigma) was labeled with 59Fe (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA) to produce 59Fe2-transferrin (59Fe-Tf), as described previously (Richardson and Baker, 1990
). Unbound 59Fe was removed by vacuum dialysis against 0.15 M NaCl with 1.4% NaHCO3, pH 7.4. Fully saturated diferric Tf was used in all experiments.
Determination of Intracellular Iron Distribution Using Native PAGE-59Fe Autoradiography. Native PAGE-59Fe autoradiography was performed using established techniques (Richardson and Milnes, 1997
). Briefly, cells were labeled with 59Fe-Tf ([protein] = 0.75 µM) and then lysed using 55 µl of ice-cold 1.5% Triton X-100 containing 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma) followed by one freeze-thaw cycle. Samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 45 min at 4°C to separate the stromal-mitochondrial membrane (SMM) fraction from the cytosolic fraction. Under these conditions, SMM contains the disrupted plasma and nuclear membranes, intracellular membranes, and a variety of organelles including mitochondria and lysosomes (Rickwood and Patel, 1995
).
The SMM pellets were further disrupted to examine 59Fe distribution in this fraction (Richardson and Milnes, 1997
). The pellets were vigorously vortexed in the presence of 40 µl of ice-cold 1.5% Triton X-100 containing freshly prepared 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and glass powder (Richardson and Milnes, 1997
). Samples were then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 45 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected.
Cytosolic fractions and/or SMM fractions were loaded onto a 5% native PAGE gel to give equal counts of radioactive 59Fe across all samples. Therefore, the autoradiograph compares the relative intracellular distribution of 59Fe within each fraction, rather than the amount of 59Fe/µg protein. Radioactive counts were determined using a
-scintillation counter (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Similar experiments were also performed loading equal amounts of protein (100 µg) across all samples. Protein concentrations were determined using a protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Experiments loading equal radioactive counts gave results similar to those obtained using equal protein loading. Electrophoresis was performed at 15 mA/gel for 2 to 3 h at 4°C. Gels were subsequently dried at 80°C, and autoradiography was performed. Bands on X-ray film were quantified by scanning densitometry using a Laser Densitometer and analyzed by Kodak Biomax I Software (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
[3H]Leucine Incorporation Assay. To assess cellular protein synthesis, [3H]leucine assays were performed. Cells were seeded onto 96-well plates at 15,000 cells/well and incubated overnight. Cells were then incubated with the agents of interest for 24 h at 37°C, followed by incubation with [3H]leucine (0.67 µCi) for 2 h at 37°C (Amersham Biosciences UK, Ltd., Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). Cells were harvested using a MicroCell Harvester (Molecular Devices Skatron, Lier, Norway) onto filter mats, and radioactivity was measured on a
scintillation counter (1205 Beta-plate liquid scintillation counter; PerkinElmer Wallac, Turku, Finland). Protein synthesis was determined by the incorporation of [3H]leucine into cells using standard techniques (Richardson and Milnes, 1997
).
Lysosomal Enzyme Activity Assay. To determine the activity of a range of lysosomal enzymes, cells were incubated with control media or DOX (5 µM) for 24 h at 37°C. The cell pellets were then lysed by freeze-thawing, and protein concentration was determined using the Lowry method. Enzyme activity was assessed using fluorogenic 4-methyl umbelliferyl substrates at 37°C according to standard clinical procedures (Giljaard, 1980
) used at the Department of Chemical Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital (Adelaide, Australia). Results are expressed as nanomoles of substrate cleaved per minute per milligram of protein.
Statistical Analysis. Experimental data were compared using the Student's t test. Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In these experiments, SK-Mel-28 melanoma cells were used to assess the effects of DOX (20 µM) compared with control medium on 59Fe uptake from 59Fe-Tf (0.75 µM). Quantitative 59Fe uptake from 59Fe-Tf in control cells was linear as a function of incubation time (r = 0.99) (Fig. 1A), as observed in previous studies using this cell type (Richardson and Baker, 1990
). Cells incubated with DOX (20 µM) also demonstrated linear (r = 0.97) 59Fe uptake from 59Fe-Tf as a function of incubation time (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, DOX (20 µM) had no significant effect on the rate of 59Fe uptake compared with the control (Fig. 1A). Examining the amounts of intracellular 59Fe between the cytosol and SMM fractions, it was evident that most 59Fe was found in the cytosol for both control and DOX-treated cells (Fig. 1B). After 18 and 24 h, significantly (p < 0.03) more 59Fe was detected in the cytosol of DOX-treated cells compared with cells incubated with control medium (Fig. 1B). Conversely, significantly (p < 0.04) less 59Fe was found in the SMM fraction in DOX-treated cells compared with control cells, particularly after 24 h (Fig. 1B). These results suggested that for time points beyond 18 h, DOX increased the ratio of 59Fe between the cytosol and SMM during 59Fe uptake from 59Fe-Tf compared with control cells.
|
The cellular distribution of 59Fe within the cytosol (Fig. 2A) and SMM (Fig. 2C) was then assessed using the native PAGE-59Fe autoradiography technique (Fig. 2, A and C). In these studies, equal amounts of radioactivity were added to each lane of the gel, and the distribution of 59Fe between intracellular molecules was assessed. As described in Fig. 1B, the quantitative amount of 59Fe in the cytosol was greater than that found in the SMM. Considering this, it should be noted that although the ferritin-59Fe bands in Fig. 2, A and C, are of similar intensity, this is because of the different exposure periods used to optimize detection of 59Fe-containing components.
|
The distribution of cytosolic 59Fe in Figs. 2A and 3A has been reported previously (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
), but it was important to include in this study so as to compare the cytosolic and SMM fractions. It was evident that 59Fe distribution was similar in both the cytosol and SMM fractions (Fig. 2, A and C). A large proportion of 59Fe in control and DOX-treated cells was found in a band that comigrated with horse spleen ferritin (Fig. 2, A and C) and could be super-shifted with an antiferritin antibody, further confirming its identity (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). Several bands above ferritin and a low molecular mass band were found in both the cytosol and SMM (Fig. 2, A and C). As discussed previously (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
), the exact molecular identity of these bands above and below ferritin remain unclear and were not the focus of this investigation.
|
In both the cytosol and SMM of control cells, 59Fe incorporation in ferritin increased up to 6 h and thereafter decreased to levels observed at the 3-h time point (Fig. 2, A and C, compare lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7; Fig. 2, B and D). In contrast, DOX resulted in marked accumulation of 59Fe in ferritin compared with the control, particularly for incubations of 6 h or more (Fig. 2, A and C, compare lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8; Fig. 2, B and D). Indeed, we have shown previously that after an 18- or 24-h label with 59Fe-Tf in the presence of DOX, 59Feferritin levels were significantly (p < 0.004) higher compared with control cells (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). The 59Fe-containing bands above ferritin in the SMM were more pronounced in control cells than in those incubated with DOX after incubations of 18 or 24 h (Fig. 2C; compare lanes 5 and 7 with lanes 6 and 8). This suggested that in contrast to control cells, DOX resulted in the majority of 59Fe being incorporated into ferritin with very little being distributed to other compartments. The presence of ferritin in the SMM is of interest, because although ferritin is a cytosolic protein, there are reports of ferritin associated with lysosomes, where it could be catabolized (Roberts and Bomford, 1988
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
; Persson et al., 2001
). Alternatively, recently a mitochondrial ferritin has been discovered that is believed to play a role in iron metabolism (Corsi et al., 2002
). Therefore, we cannot discount that at least some of the 59Fe detected in the SMM may be associated with this latter molecule.
Cellular 59Fe Redistribution into the Cytosol and Stromal Mitochondrial Membrane Fraction in the Presence and Absence of DOX. Our previous study demonstrated that DOX inhibits the redistribution of 59Fe from cytosolic ferritin, resulting in a marked accumulation within this molecule (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). We investigated using pulse-chase experiments if the cytosolic ferritin-59Fe accumulation was caused by the redistribution of 59Fe from the SMM to the cytosol. Cells were incubated with 59Fe-Tf (0.75 µM) for 3 h at 37°C, washed, and reincubated in control media or media containing DOX (20 µM) for 0 to 24 h.
Quantitative analysis of 59Fe levels demonstrated that the total 59Fe in both control and DOX-treated cells decreased as a function of reincubation time, with there being no significant difference between the two groups (Fig. 3A). Examination of the cytosol and SMM demonstrated that 59Fe levels in these fractions also decreased as a function of incubation time in both control and DOX-treated cells (Fig. 3B). However, there was no significant difference in 59Fe levels in the cytosol and SMM between control and DOX-treated cells (Fig. 3B). The decrease in cellular 59Fe levels was caused by the efflux of 59Fe into the reincubation medium that occurs in the presence of 10% FCS but not in its absence (data not shown; Richardson and Baker, 1990
). The reason for this considerable release of 59Fe in the presence of serum is unclear but could be related to the presence of the ferroxidase ceruloplasmin that acts to mobilize 59Fe from cells (Richardson, 1999
).
The distribution of 59Fe within the cytosol and SMM was then assessed after the initial 3-h labeling period with 59Fe-Tf (Fig. 4, A and C). Reincubation of cells in control media for 3 or 6 h markedly increased the incorporation of 59Fe in cytosolic and SMM ferritin (Fig. 4, A and C; compare lane 1 with lanes 2 and 4). However, after a longer chase period of 18 to 24 h in control media, the incorporation of 59Fe in ferritin markedly decreased to levels comparable with that observed at the 0-h time point (Fig. 4, A and C; compare lanes 2 and 4 with lanes 6 and 8; Fig. 4, B and D). Notably, in control cells at the 18- and 24-h time points, 59Fe could be detected in a range of diffuse higher molecular mass bands in the cytosol and SMM (Fig. 4, A and C, lanes 6 and 8). These results indicate that in control cells, 59Fe was initially incorporated into ferritin, but it is later mobilized from this molecule and relocated to other compartments within both the cytosol and SMM. These experiments support our previous study examining cytosolic 59Fe distribution (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
).
|
When DOX was present during the chase period, 59Fe incorporation into ferritin continued to increase with reincubation time, resulting in a marked accumulation of 59Feferritin in the cytosol and SMM (Fig. 4, A and C, lanes 3, 5, 7, and 9; Fig. 4, B and D). Indeed, our earlier studies have demonstrated that after an 18- or 24-h reincubation with DOX, a significant (p < 0.0003) accumulation of 59Fe-ferritin was observed compared with control cells (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). In contrast to control cells, there was little evidence of 59Fe localization in other bands above or below the ferritin band in DOX-treated cells (Fig. 4, A and C; compare lanes 6 and 7, lanes 8 and 9).
Effect of an Anthracycline Aglycone on 59Fe Incorporation into Ferritin. We investigated whether the inhibition of iron mobilization from ferritin was a nonspecific cytotoxic response after anthracycline treatment. Because the aminosugar on the anthracycline molecule is believed to be an important structural requirement for the cytotoxic and DNA-binding activity of anthracyclines (Zunino et al., 2001
), we examined the less cytotoxic DOX aglycone, doxorubicinone, that lacks the sugar moiety (Zunino et al., 2001
). In these experiments, SK-Mel-28 cells were labeled with 59Fe-Tf for 3 h, washed, and reincubated in control media, DOX (5 and 10 µM), or doxorubicinone (5 and 10 µM) for 18 h at 37°C.
Incubation of cells with the aglycone doxorubicinone (5 and 10 µM) resulted in no cytotoxicity, as demonstrated by the absence of cell death and morphological changes compared with control cells (data not shown). As observed previously, DOX at both 5 and 10 µM resulted in a marked 5- to 7-fold accumulation of 59Fe in ferritin compared with control cells (Fig. 5A; compare lanes 1 and 2, lanes 4 and 5; Fig. 5B). Cells incubated with 5 µM doxorubicinone resulted in a 1.8-fold increase in 59Fe-ferritin levels compared with the control (Fig. 5A; compare lanes 1 and 3; Fig. 5B). Higher concentrations of 10 µM doxorubicinone caused a 3-fold increase in 59Fe-ferritin compared with control cells (Fig. 5A; compare lanes 3 and 6; Fig. 5B). However, the ability of doxorubicinone to accumulate 59Fe in ferritin was less than that observed in DOX-treated cells (Fig. 5A; compare lanes 2 and 3, lanes 5 and 6; Fig. 5B). Hence, even the noncytotoxic aglycone resulted in an accumulation of iron in ferritin, suggesting that the effect of DOX on increasing ferritin iron levels was not caused by its cytotoxic effect. Moreover, the less pronounced effect of the doxorubicin aglycone on inducing ferritin iron accumulation compared with DOX suggests that the aminosugar residue of DOX is an active moiety that contributes to this effect.
|
Indeed, the ability of DOX to induce 59Fe accumulation in ferritin has been observed even at 1 µM DOX, and this effect plateaued at approximately 5 µM DOX (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). After a 24-h incubation of cells with these lower concentrations of DOX, little cell death was observed (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). In addition, previous experiments with another commonly used cytotoxic agent, cisplatin, had far less effect on 59Fe-ferritin accumulation compared with cells incubated with DOX. This was despite the marked cell death observed with cisplatin-treated cells compared with cells incubated with DOX (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). Hence, the ability of DOX to inhibit 59Fe mobilization from ferritin does not seem to simply be a nonspecific cytotoxic effect.
Collectively, the above studies suggest that the presence of DOX inhibited the normal redistribution of 59Fe from ferritin to other molecules in the cytosol and SMM. Considering the possible role of lysosomes in ferritin-iron release (Roberts and Bomford, 1988
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
; Persson et al., 2001
), the accumulation of ferritin-59Fe in the cytosol and SMM of DOX-treated cells, but not control cells, could suggest that DOX was inhibiting lysosomal catabolism of ferritin.
In the experiments described below, we investigated the effects of a variety of well-characterized metabolic inhibitors, protein synthesis inhibitors, lysosomal enzyme inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, and lysosomotropic agents to further understand the mechanisms involved in the DOX-mediated accumulation of ferritin-59Fe.
Metabolic Inhibitors Induce Ferritin-59Fe Accumulation. We showed that DOX induces ferritin-59Fe accumulation by preventing 59Fe mobilization from cytosolic and SMM ferritin (Fig. 4, A and C) (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). At present, little is known about the mechanisms of iron release from ferritin, although the lysosome has been implicated in this process through its ability to catabolize the molecule (Roberts and Bomford, 1988
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
; Persson et al., 2001
). Alternatively, iron mobilization may occur by the reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II) in the ferritin core by an unknown reductase or reducing factor (Harrison and Arosio, 1996
). Irrespective of the mechanism(s) involved, metabolic energy will probably be essential for the process. Considering this, the effect of three well-known metabolic inhibitors on the accumulation of 59Fe in ferritin were examined (Fig. 6, A and B).
|
Pulse-chase experiments were performed by prelabeling cells with 59Fe-Tf for 6 h, followed by washing and reincubation of cells for 18 h with control media, DOX (10 or 20 µM), NaN3 (5 or 30 mM), NaCN (1 or 5 mM), or rotenone (10 or 50 µM). We have shown previously that these concentrations effectively decrease cellular ATP levels (Watts and Richardson, 2001
; Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). As found for DOX, all metabolic inhibitors induced ferritin-59Fe accumulation compared with the control (Fig. 6, A and B). Unexpectedly, cyanide at the higher concentration of 5 mM was less effective than at 1 mM in terms of inducing ferritin-59Fe accumulation. The reason for this is uncertain at present, but it is possible that 5 mM cyanide caused cytotoxicity before any changes in 59Fe-ferritin levels occurred in the cell. Collectively, the results indicate that ferritin-59Fe mobilization is an energy-dependent event.
Inhibition of Protein Synthesis by Cycloheximide Inhibits Iron Mobilization and Results in the Accumulation of 59Fe in Ferritin. Anthracyclines are known to depress cellular protein synthesis (Gianni and Myers, 1992
), and it is possible that this latter activity could prevent ferritin-59Fe mobilization and induce iron accumulation in this molecule. Because lysosomes may be involved in ferritin-iron mobilization (Hernandez-Yago et al., 1980
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
) and because lysosomal function requires the continuous synthesis of lysosomal enzymes and proteins (Pillay et al., 2002
), it was important to assess the effects of inhibiting protein synthesis on ferritin-59Fe accumulation. In the experiments below, we investigated the effect of the well-known protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide on ferritin-59Fe accumulation (Fig. 7).
|
Pulse-chase experiments were performed by incubating cells with 59Fe-Tf (0.75 µM) for 6 h at 37°C, followed by washing and reincubation with control media, cycloheximide (20140 µM), or DOX (5 µM) for 18 h at 37°C (Fig. 7, A and B). These concentrations were in the effective range used in the literature (Darnell and Richardson, 1999
). Cycloheximide at all concentrations (20140 µM) resulted in a marked 9- to 10-fold increase in 59Fe-ferritin levels compared with cells incubated with control media alone (Fig. 7, A and B; compare lane 1 with lanes 24). This accumulation was comparable with the 8-fold accumulation of 59Fe-ferritin caused by 5 µM DOX (Fig. 7, A and B; compare lanes 1 and 5). Another protein synthesis inhibitor, puromycin (5200 µM), was also assessed, and like cycloheximide, it prevented 59Fe mobilization and resulted in marked ferritin-59Fe accumulation (data not shown). These studies showed that, similar to DOX, the inhibition of cellular protein synthesis by cycloheximide or puromycin could prevent ferritin-59Fe mobilization.
To further confirm the role of protein synthesis in the redistribution of 59Fe-ferritin, cells exposed to cycloheximide were allowed to recover by washing and reincubation in medium alone. In these studies, cells were labeled with 59Fe-Tf for 6 h at 37°C, washed, and reincubated in cycloheximide (20 µM) for 18 h at 37°C. Cells were then washed again and reincubated for 0 to 24 h in media (MEM) alone before 59Fe-PAGE autoradiography (Fig. 7, C and D). The 59Fe-ferritin levels after a 3-h reincubation in cycloheximide-free media decreased slightly compared with cells not reincubated in media (Fig. 7C, compare lanes 1 and 2; Fig. 7D). However, after a 6-h reincubation in cycloheximide-free media, 59Fe-ferritin levels decreased to 43% compared with the 0-h time point (Fig. 7, C, compare lanes 1 and 3, and D). After a 24-h reincubation in cycloheximide-free medium, 93% of 59Fe had been mobilized from ferritin (Fig. 7, C, compare lanes 1 and 5, and D). These results demonstrate that after the removal of cycloheximide, cells were able to recover their ability to mobilize 59Fe from ferritin.
Inability of Cells to Recover 59Fe Mobilization from Ferritin after DOX Treatment. The above studies demonstrated that cycloheximide acts similarly to DOX to induce ferritin-59Fe accumulation, and this was at least partially reversible when the inhibitor was removed (Fig. 7, C and D). Experiments were then performed to determine whether ferritin-59Fe accumulation after exposure to DOX could be reduced upon reincubation with DOX-free media (i.e., MEM). Cells were prelabeled with 59Fe-Tf, washed, and reincubated with control media, DOX (15 µM), or cycloheximide (20 µM) for 18 h at 37°C. In parallel samples, cells were washed and then further reincubated for 24 h in media to allow recovery from DOX or cycloheximide (Fig. 8).
|
Low concentrations of DOX (12 µM) only slightly increased 59Fe-ferritin levels compared with control cells (Fig. 8, A and B; compare lane 1 with lanes 2 and 3). However, DOX (5 µM), and to a greater extent cycloheximide (20 µM), markedly increased 59Fe-ferritin levels compared with the control (Fig. 8, A and B, compare lane 1 with lanes 4 and 5). Despite a further 24-h reincubation with DOX-free media, 59Fe-ferritin accumulation in DOX-treated cells decreased only slightly or remained unchanged compared with cells not reincubated in MEM (Fig. 8, A and B; compare lanes 24 with lanes 79). However, as seen previously (Fig. 7, C and D), reincubation of cycloheximide-treated cells in MEM markedly decreased 59Fe accumulation in ferritin (Fig. 8, A and B; compare lanes 5 and 10). These results suggested that the mechanism by which DOX inhibits 59Fe mobilization from ferritin was not reversible despite removal of the agent from the incubation media. It is likely that DOX remains trapped within the cell even upon reincubation in DOX-free media.
Recovery of Protein Synthesis Upon Removal of Cycloheximide or Doxorubicin. We demonstrated above that incubation of SK-Mel-28 melanoma cells with cycloheximide or DOX resulted in marked ferritin-59Fe accumulation (Figs. 7 and 8). This inhibition could be relieved when cycloheximide was removed from the cells, resulting in mobilization of 59Fe from ferritin (Figs. 7 and 8). However, ferritin-59Fe accumulation observed after incubation with DOX could not be reversed by reincubation with DOX-free media (Fig. 8). To determine whether these results correlated to the recovery of protein synthesis after removal of the test agents, [3H]leucine assays were performed (Fig. 9).
|
Cells were incubated with control media, cycloheximide (0.1418 µM) or DOX (0.0220 µM) for 18 h, and total [3H]leucine incorporation was assessed. In a parallel set of experiments, cells incubated with these concentrations of cycloheximide or DOX were washed and then reincubated for 24 h at 37°C with media alone (MEM) before assessing [3H]leucine incorporation (Fig. 9).
Figure 9 shows that cycloheximide and DOX were extremely effective at inhibiting cellular protein synthesis in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 9, A and B). Interestingly, when cycloheximide-treated cells were reincubated with MEM for 24 h, a significant (p < 0.003) recovery of protein synthesis was observed at concentrations greater than 4 µM (Fig. 9A). Hence, the recovery of protein synthesis (Fig. 9A) and 59Fe mobilization from ferritin (Fig. 7, C and D) were correlated after the removal of cycloheximide. Despite reincubation in MEM, [3H]leucine incorporation in DOX-treated cells continued to decrease (Fig. 9B). This was significant even in cells previously incubated with only 1 µM DOX (p < 0.00004). The inability of cells to recover protein synthesis after treatment with DOX could explain the absence of 59Fe mobilization from ferritin upon removal of DOX from cells (Fig. 8, A and B). Again, this suggests that DOX is still present within the cell despite removal of the agent from the reincubation media. Hence, these studies suggested that mobilization of 59Fe accumulated in ferritin required the recovery of cellular protein synthesis. Furthermore, these results demonstrated that anthracyclines irreversibly inhibit protein synthesis and 59Fe mobilization from ferritin.
Inhibition of Lysosomal Enzymes Inhibits Ferritin-59Fe Mobilization. Previous studies have suggested that the lysosome plays a role in the release of iron from ferritin (Roberts and Bomford, 1988
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
; Persson et al., 2001
). Hence, the decrease in 59Fe-ferritin levels and its redistribution to other cellular compartments observed in control cells (Fig. 4, A and C) may be mediated by lysosomal degradation of ferritin (Roberts and Bomford, 1988
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
; Persson et al., 2001
). It is also possible that the accumulation of ferritin-59Fe observed in DOX-treated cells (Fig. 4, A and C) was caused by DOX-induced inhibition of lysosomal ferritin degradation. In fact, anthracyclines localize in lysosomes (Hurwitz et al., 1997
) and disrupt their morphology and enzyme activity (Singal et al., 1985
). Considering this, we assessed the effect of lysosomal enzyme inhibitors on the redistribution of 59Fe from ferritin. Lysosomal enzymes are largely composed of cysteine, aspartic, and serine proteases (Pillay et al., 2002
). Hence, we examined the following: pepstatin A, an aspartic protease inhibitor with high specificity for cathepsin D (Knight and Barrett, 1976
); E64d, a cysteine protease inhibitor with high specificity for cathepsin B (McGowan et al., 1989
); and leupeptin, a general cysteine and serine protease inhibitor (Pillay et al., 2002
). In addition, because proteasome-mediated degradation of oxidized ferritin has been reported (Rudeck et al., 2000
), we examined the well-characterized proteosome inhibitors MG132 and lactacystin (Lee and Goldberg, 1998
).
In these studies, pulse-chase experiments were performed in which cells were labeled with 59Fe-Tf for 6 h at 37°C, washed, and then reincubated for 18 h at 37°C with control media, pepstatin A (100 µM), E64d (100 µM), leupeptin (50 and 100 µM), MG132 (10 µM), lactacystin (10 and 25 µM), or DOX (5 µM). These concentrations were within the effective range used in the literature (Ohshita et al., 1992
). Pepstatin A alone had little effect on cytosolic 59Fe-ferritin levels compared with control cells (Fig. 10, A and B, compare lanes 1 and 2), suggesting that aspartic proteases were not involved in ferritin-59Fe mobilization. In contrast, all other lysosomal or proteasomal inhibitors induced 59Fe-ferritin accumulation by 3- to 5-fold compared with control cells (Fig. 10, A and B, compare lane 1 with lanes 38). Combination of pepstatin A and E64d gave the same result as treatment with E64d alone (data not shown). Considering these results, the ferritin-59Fe accumulation observed after incubation with DOX could be caused by the inhibition of the lysosome-mediated ferritin degradation pathway.
|
Inhibition of Lysosomal Acidification Inhibits Ferritin-59Fe Mobilization. To further test the hypothesis that 59Fe release from ferritin involved lysosomes, experiments were performed to inhibit lysosomal acidification that is required for optimal enzymatic activity (Pillay et al., 2002
). Pulse-chase experiments were therefore performed using three well-known lysosomotropic agents (NH4Cl, chloroquine, and methylamine) that increase intralysosomal pH (Ohkuma and Poole, 1978
).
In these studies, cells were prelabeled with 59Fe-Tf for 6 h at 37°C, washed, and reincubated with NH4Cl (1.5 or 15 mM), chloroquine (25 or 250 µM), methylamine (1.5 or 15 mM), or DOX (5 µM) for 18 h at 37°C to assess the role of lysosomal activity in ferritin-59Fe accumulation (Fig. 10, C and D). The lower concentration of each lysosomotropic agent had little effect on 59Fe-ferritin levels compared with control cells (Fig. 10, C, compare lane 1 with lanes 2, 4, and 6, and D). However, at the higher concentrations, NH4Cl (15 mM), chloroquine (250 µM), and methylamine (15 mM) markedly increased 59Fe-ferritin levels to 3- to 4-fold of that of the control (Fig. 10, C, compare lane 1 with lanes 3, 5, and 7, and D), whereas DOX increased it to 5.5-fold of that of the control value (Fig. 10C, compare lanes 1 and 9). These results with lysosomotropic agents suggest that inhibition of intralysosomal acidification could prevent the mobilization of ferritin-59Fe. These data support our experiments using lysosomal enzyme inhibitors (Fig. 10, A and B). It is of interest to note that the 59Fe-ferritin band observed in cells treated with high concentrations of NH4Cl, chloroquine, or methylamine was not a well-defined band as seen in control cells (Fig. 10C, compare lane 1 with lanes 3, 5, and 7). The reason for this observation remains unclear at present.
Effect of DOX on Lysosomal Enzyme Activity. Because DOX markedly inhibits cellular protein synthesis (Fig. 9B) (Gianni and Myers, 1992
) and inhibition of lysosomal enzyme activity results in marked iron accumulation in ferritin (Fig. 10), it was possible to speculate that this drug targets lysosomal enzyme synthesis, resulting in the inhibition of ferritin degradation and the release of iron from the protein. Hence, the activities of eight lysosomal enzymes were assessed in cells after 24-h incubations with control media or DOX (5 µM). The enzymes examined were the following:
-galactosidase,
-glucuronidase,
-fucosidase,
-mannosidase,
-hexosaminidase A,
-N-acetyl-galactosaminidase, arylsulfatase A, and acid phosphatase.
A slight increase in
-galactosidase activity was detected in DOX-treated cells (24 ± 1 nmol/min/mg protein) compared with control cells (20 ± 0.1 nmol/min/mg protein), as previously shown by others (Singal et al., 1985
). However, DOX did not markedly affect the activity of the other lysosomal enzymes examined (data not shown). These results suggested that inhibition of these lysosomal enzymes was not the primary target of DOX that induces ferritin-59Fe accumulation. However, we cannot discount that other lysosomal enzymes or molecules may be the targets of anthracyclines.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Currently, the mechanisms by which iron is released from ferritin for metabolic use are little understood, but it has been suggested to involve a lysosomal-mediated protein degradation pathway (Roberts and Bomford, 1988
; Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
; Persson et al., 2001
). In the present study, we demonstrated for the first time that ferritin-59Fe mobilization is dependent on metabolic energy and protein synthesis. Moreover, a variety of well-characterized lysosomal enzyme inhibitors, lysosomotropic agents, and proteasomal inhibitors resulted in marked accumulation of ferritin-59Fe that was comparable with that found using DOX. These data provide further evidence that DOX inhibits the activity of lysosomes in the degradation of ferritin that is essential for the release and redistribution of metabolically useful iron.
It could be suggested that the effect of DOX on inducing ferritin-59Fe accumulation is a nonspecific cytotoxic response. However, we have shown that the noncytotoxic doxorubicin aglycone doxorubicinone also resulted in accumulation of 59Fe in ferritin (Fig. 5, A and B). In addition, as demonstrated in our previous study (Kwok and Richardson 2003
), another commonly used antitumor agent, cisplatin, at 10 µM had little effect on 59Fe accumulation in ferritin compared with control cells, despite being very cytotoxic. Furthermore, as shown in this latter study, low concentrations of DOX (15 µM) resulted in marked ferritin iron accumulation, although there was little cell death. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the effect of DOX on inducing ferritin-iron accumulation was not caused by nonspecific cytotoxicity.
The lysosome plays a major role in the normal degradation and recycling of cellular proteins for anabolic use. To date, no study has examined the effect of anthracyclines on ferritin-iron metabolism and the potential of lysosomes and proteasomes as targets for these drugs. However, it is of considerable interest that anthracyclines accumulate in acidic vacuoles such as lysosomes (Hurwitz et al., 1997
) and vesicles of the Golgi apparatus (Klohs and Steinkampf, 1988
). In their uncharged, hydrophobic state, anthracyclines diffuse across membranes, and within acidic compartments they become protonated and trapped (Hurwitz et al., 1997
). In addition, early in vivo studies demonstrated that anthracyclines affect lysosomal morphology and enzyme activity (Singal et al., 1985
). Furthermore, it has been shown in the mouse leukemia cell line L1210 that DOX has high affinity for the 20S subunit of the proteasome (Kiyomiya et al., 2001
). Although interactions between anthracyclines and lysosomes or proteasomes have been described, precisely how these anticancer agents affect proteolytic systems remains to be further investigated. As shown in our current study, the activity of eight lysosomal enzymes was not affected by DOX. This observation suggested that the ferritin-59Fe accumulation observed in the presence of this drug was not a general effect on lysosomal enzymes. However, DOX may inhibit other lysosomal proteases that are essential for ferritin turnover. Indeed, the precise identities of the proteases that degrade ferritin remain unknown.
The current study demonstrated that general depression of cellular protein synthesis inhibited ferritin degradation and the redistribution of metabolically useful iron (Figs. 7 and 8). The fact that DOX markedly and irreversibly inhibited protein synthesis (Fig. 9B) may be one mechanism by which it inhibits the renewal of essential proteolytic mechanisms. Certainly, some lysosomal enzymes such as sialidase have a short half-life of approximately 2.7 h (Vinogradova et al., 1998
), and hence, continued protein synthesis is vital to renew lysosomal enzymatic activity. Other crucial molecules in the lysosomal pathway include the lysosome-associated membrane proteins and the membrane-bound transporter of cysteine (for review see Pillay et al., 2002
). Inhibition of the synthesis of any of these essential molecules will disrupt the normal lysosomal degradation process. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that lysosomes are highly dynamic, capable of moving from the cell periphery to the perinuclear regions and vice versa (Radisky and Kaplan, 1998
). Therefore, microtubules probably play a significant role in the stability and trafficking of lysosomes (Matteoni and Kreis, 1987
) and could be a potential target for protein synthesis inhibition that can disrupt lysosomal activity.
There are more than 50 lysosomal hydrolases, and these can be classified into the aspartic, cysteine, and serine proteases (Pillay et al., 2002
). Incubation of SK-Mel-28 melanoma cells with the aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin A had little effect on ferritin-59Fe accumulation (Fig. 10, A and B), suggesting that this class of enzymes is not primarily involved in ferritin-59Fe mobilization. However, both E64d and leupeptin markedly increased ferritin-59Fe accumulation, suggesting that cysteine and/or serine proteases may be responsible for 59Fe mobilization from this molecule. In fact, it is possible that the localization of anthracyclines in lysosomes (Hurwitz et al., 1997
) inhibits certain lysosomal enzymes (Singal et al., 1985
), resulting in a marked accumulation of ferritin-iron.
Interestingly, the structurally distinct and widely used proteasome inhibitors MG132 and leupeptin also markedly prevented ferritin-59Fe mobilization (Fig. 10, A and B). The reversible inhibitor, MG132, targets the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome (Lee and Goldberg, 1998
). However, it is not completely selective and has been demonstrated to also target certain lysosomal cysteine proteases and the calpains (Lee and Goldberg, 1998
). Similarly, whereas lactacystin acts irreversibly and has higher specificity, it can also inhibit the lysosomal protease cathepsin A (Dick et al., 1996
). Hence, it could be suggested that the accumulation of ferritin-59Fe observed with the proteasome inhibitors MG132 and lactacystin were caused by the inhibition of lysosomal proteases. This could argue against a role for proteasomes in the degradation of ferritin-iron. Alternatively, because the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway also plays a major role in the selective degradation of intracellular proteins (Lee and Goldberg, 1998
), it is not unreasonable to speculate that proteasomes may be involved in ferritin degradation. Indeed, various in vitro and cellular studies have demonstrated proteasome-mediated degradation of ferritin (Rudeck et al., 2000
). It is also possible that the avid association of anthracyclines with the 20S proteasomal subunit (Kiyomiya et al., 2001
) may prevent ferritin degradation. This would explain the marked accumulation of ferritin-59Fe when cells were incubated with the proteasome inhibitors MG132 and lactacystin (Fig. 10, A and B).
It is relevant to discuss that the potent metabolic inhibitors cyanide, azide, and rotenone all prevented 59Fe mobilization from ferritin in a manner similar to that of DOX (Fig. 6). These three agents have been shown to markedly reduce ATP levels in our previous studies over shorter or the same incubation period used in this investigation (Watts and Richardson, 2001
; Kwok and Richardson, 2003
), whereas DOX at the same concentration used in our experiments (i.e., 520 µM) did not (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). This suggests that the ferritin-59Fe accumulation observed after incubation with DOX was not predominantly caused by a pronounced decrease in ATP levels and could be related to its other properties such as protein synthesis inhibition. However, the fact that marked metabolic depletion inhibits the 59Fe-mobilization process from ferritin indicates that this mechanism is energy-dependent.
In our previous study, we showed that the redox-cycling drugs menadione and paraquat also resulted in ferritin-59Fe accumulation (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). This effect could be partially reversed by the cell-permeable glutathione peroxidase mimetic ebselen and the membrane-permeable superoxide dismutase mimetic MnTBAP (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). However, it is important to note that these agents were less effective at reversing ferritin-59Fe accumulation induced by DOX (Kwok and Richardson, 2003
). One possible explanation consistent with the current investigation is that the free radicals generated by these redox cycling agents may affect lysosomal function, as proposed in other studies (Persson et al., 2001
).
In summary, the current study demonstrates that DOX inhibits 59Fe mobilization from ferritin in the cytosol and SMM. We showed that inhibition of energy generation or protein synthesis inhibits the ferritin-59Fe mobilization pathway. A variety of lysosomal enzyme inhibitors, proteasomal inhibitors, and lysosomotropic agents resulted in marked accumulation of ferritin-59Fe that was comparable with that found using DOX. These data provide further evidence of a mechanism involving lysosomes in the degradation of ferritin for the release and redistribution of metabolically useful iron. The inhibition of iron redistribution from ferritin may have detrimental effects on vital iron-dependent processes in the cell. Considering that anthracyclines accumulate in lysosomes, it is possible that the lysosomal degradation pathway represents a potential target for anthracycline cytotoxicity.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: TfR1, transferrin receptor 1; DOX, doxorubicin; E64d, (2S,3S)-trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-2-methylbutane ethyl ester; MG132, N-benzoyloxycarbonyl (Z)-Leu-Leu-leucinal; MEM, minimum essential medium; SMM, stromal-mitochondrial membrane; Tf, transferrin; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MnTBAP, Mn(III)tetrakis(4-benzoic acid)-porphyrin.
Address correspondence to: Dr. D.R. Richardson, Children's Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research, Iron Metabolism and Chelation Program, P.O. Box 81, High Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia. E-mail: d.richardson{at}ccia.org.au
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bolann BJ and Ulvik RJ (1987) Release of iron from ferritin by xanthine oxidase. Role of the superoxide radical. Biochem J 243: 55-59.[Medline]
Corsi B, Cozzi A, Arosio P, Drysdale J, Samtambrogio P, Campanella A, Biasiotto G, Albertini A, and Levi S (2002) Human mitochondrial ferritin expressed in HeLa cells incorporates iron and affects cellular iron metabolism. J Biol Chem 277: 22430-22437.
Darnell G and Richardson DR (1999) The potential of iron chelators of the pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone class as effective antiproliferative agents III: the effect of the ligands on molecular targets involved in proliferation. Blood 94: 781-792.
Dick LR, Cruikshank AA, Greiner L, Melandri FD, Nunes SL, and Stein RL (1996) Mechanistic studies on the activation of the proteasome by lactacystin: a central role for clasto-lactacystin
-lactone. J Biol Chem 271: 7273-7276.
Funk F, Lenders JP, Crichton RR, and Schneider W (1985) Reductive mobilisation of ferritin iron. Eur J Biochem 152: 167-172.[Medline]
Gianni L and Myers C (1992) The role of free radical formation in the cardiotoxicity of anthracycline, in Cancer Treatment and the Heart (Muggia FM, Green MD, and Speyer JL eds) pp 9-46, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Giljaard H (1980) Genetic Metabolic Diseases: Early Diagnosis and Prenatal Analysis, Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.
Harrison PM and Arosio P (1996) The ferritins: molecular properties, iron storage function and cellular regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1275: 161-203.[Medline]
Hernandez-Yago J, Knecht E, Martinez-Ramon A, and Grisola S (1980) Autophagy of ferritin incorporated into the cytosol of Hela cells by liposomes. Cell Tissue Res 205: 303-309.[Medline]
Hurwitz SJ, Terashima M, Mizunuma N, and Slapak CA (1997) Vesicular anthracycline accumulation in doxorubicin-selected U-937 cells: participation of lysosomes. Blood 89: 3745-3754.
Jin W, Takagi H, Pancorbo B, and Theil EC (2001) "Opening" the ferritin pore for iron release by mutation of conserved amino acids at interhelix and loop sites. Biochemistry 40: 7525-7532.[Medline]
Kiyomiya K, Matsuo S, and Kurebe M (2001) Mechanism of specific nuclear transport of adriamycin: the mode of nuclear translocation of adriamycin-proteasome complex. Cancer Res 61: 2467-2471.
Klohs WD and Steinkampf RW (1988) The effect of lysosomotrophic agents and secretory inhibitors on anthracycline retention and activity in multiple drug-resistant cells. Mol Pharmacol 34: 180-185.[Abstract]
Knight CG and Barrett AJ (1976) Interaction of human cathepsin D with the inhibitor pepstatin. Biochem J 155: 117-125.[Medline]
Kotamraju S, Chitambar CR, Kalivendi S, Joseph J, and Kalyanaraman B (2002) Transferrin receptor-dependent iron uptake is responsible for doxorubicin-mediated apoptosis in endothelial cells: role of oxidant-induced iron signaling in apoptosis. J Biol Chem 277: 17179-17187.
Kwok JC and Richardson DR (2002a) Anthracycline-mediated alterations in iron regulatory protein-RNA-binding activity: the iron and copper complexes of anthracyclines decrease RNA-binding activity. Mol Pharmacol 62: 888-900.
Kwok JC and Richardson DR (2002b) The iron metabolism of neoplastic cells: alterations that facilitate proliferation? Crit Rev Haematol Oncol 42: 65-78.
Kwok JC and Richardson DR (2003) Anthracyclines induce accumulation of iron in ferritin in myocardial and neoplastic cells: inhibition of the ferritin iron mobilization pathway. Mol Pharmacol 63: 849-861.
Lee DH and Goldberg AL (1998) Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol 8: 397-403.[CrossRef][Medline]
Link G, Tirosh R, Pinson A, and Hershko C (1996) Role of iron in the potentiation of anthracycline cardiotoxicity: identification of heart cell mitochondria as a major site of iron-anthracycline interaction. J Lab Clin Med 127: 272-278.[CrossRef][Medline]
Matteoni R and Kreis TE (1987) Translocation and clustering of endosomes and lysosomes depends on microtubules. J Cell Biol 105: 1253-1265.
McGowan EB, Becker E, and Detwiler TC (1989) Inhibition of calpain in intact platelets by the thiol protease inhibitor E-64d. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 158: 432-435.[CrossRef][Medline]
Minotti G, Recalcati S, Mordente A, Liberi G, Calafiore AM, Mancuso C, Preziosi P, and Cairo G (1998) The secondary alcohol metabolite of doxorubicin irreversibly inactivates aconitase/iron regulatory protein-1 cytosolic fractions from human myocardium. FASEB J 12: 541-552.
Ohkuma S and Poole B (1978) Fluorescence probe measurement of the intralysosomal pH in living cells and the perturbation of pH by various agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 3327-3331.
Ohshita T, Nikawa T, Towatari T, and Katunuma N (1992) Effects of selective inhibition of cathepsin B and general inhibition of cysteine proteinases on lysosomal proteolysis in rat liver in vivo and in vitro. Eur J Biochem 209: 223-231.[Medline]
Persson HL, Nilsson KJ, and Brunk UT (2001) Novel cellular defenses against iron and oxidation: ferritin and autophagocytosis preserve lysosomal stability in airway epithelium. Redox Rep 6: 57-63.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pillay CS, Elliott E, and Dennison C (2002) Endolysosomal proteolysis and its regulation. Biochem J 363: 417-429.[CrossRef][Medline]
Radisky DC and Kaplan J (1998) Iron in cytosolic ferritin can be recycled through lysosomal degradation in human fibroblasts. Biochem J 336: 201-205.
Richardson DR (1999) Role of ceruloplasmin and ascorbate in cellular iron release. J Lab Clin Med 134: 454-465.[CrossRef][Medline]
Richardson DR and Baker E (1990) The uptake of iron and transferrin by the human melanoma cell. Biochim Biophys Acta 1053: 1-12.[Medline]
Richardson DR and Milnes K (1997) The potential of iron chelators of the pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone class as effective anti-proliferative agents II: the mechanism of action of ligands derived from salicylaldehyde benzoyl hydrazone and 2-hydroxyl-1-napthylaldehyde benzoyl hydrazone. Blood 89: 3025-3038.
Rickwood D and Patel D (1995) Fractionation and analytical methods, in Cell and Molecular Biology: Essential Data, Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York.
Roberts S and Bomford A (1988) Ferritin iron kinetics and protein turnover in K562 cells. J Biol Chem 263: 19181-19187.
Rudeck M, Volk T, Sitte N, and Grune T (2000) Ferritin oxidation in vitro: implication of iron release and degradation by the 20S proteasome. IUBMB Life 49: 451-456.[Medline]
Singal PK, Segstro RJ, Singh RP, and Kutryk MJ (1985) Changes in lysosomal morphology and enzyme activities during the development of adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy. Can J Cardiol 1: 139-147.[Medline]
Speyer BE and Fielding J (1979) Ferritin as a cytosol iron transport intermediate in human reticulocytes. J Br Haematol 42: 255-267.
Vinogradova MV, Michaud L, Mezentsev AV, Lukong KE, El-Alfy M, Morales CR, Potier M, and Pshezhetsky AV (1998) Molecular mechanism of lysosomal sialidase deficiency in galactosialidosis involves its rapid degradation. Biochem J 330: 641-650.
Watts RN and Richardson DR (2001) Nitrogen monoxide (NO) and glucose. Unexpected links between energy metabolism and NO-mediated iron mobilization from cells. J Biol Chem 276: 4724-4732.
Zunino F, Pratesi G, and Perego P (2001) Role of the sugar moiety in the pharmacological activity of anthracyclines: development of a novel series of disaccharide analogs. Biochem Pharmacol 61: 933-938.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Liang, Y. Luo, Y. Dong, C. D. Walls, J. Liang, H.-Y. Jiang, J. R. Sanford, R. C. Wek, and Z.-Y. Zhang Translational Control of C-terminal Src Kinase (Csk) Expression by PRL3 Phosphatase J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10339 - 10346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Xu, R. Sutak, and D. R. Richardson Iron Chelation by Clinically Relevant Anthracyclines: Alteration in Expression of Iron-Regulated Genes and Atypical Changes in Intracellular Iron Distribution and Trafficking Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 73(3): 833 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sterba, O. Popelova, T. Simunek, Y. Mazurova, A. Potacova, M. Adamcova, H. Kaiserova, P. Ponka, and V. Gersl Cardioprotective Effects of a Novel Iron Chelator, Pyridoxal 2-Chlorobenzoyl Hydrazone, in the Rabbit Model of Daunorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2006; 319(3): 1336 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lu, S. Liu, and T. B. Kornberg The C-terminal tail of the Hedgehog receptor Patched regulates both localization and turnover Genes & Dev., September 15, 2006; 20(18): 2539 - 2551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Goralska, S. Nagar, L. N. Fleisher, and M. C. McGahan Differential Degradation of Ferritin H- and L-Chains: Accumulation of L-Chain-Rich Ferritin in Lens Epithelial Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3521 - 3529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Alberghini, S. Recalcati, L. Tacchini, P. Santambrogio, A. Campanella, and G. Cairo Loss of the von Hippel Lindau Tumor Suppressor Disrupts Iron Homeostasis in Renal Carcinoma Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 26, 2005; 280(34): 30120 - 30128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Xu, H. L. Persson, and D. R. Richardson Molecular Pharmacology of the Interaction of Anthracyclines with Iron Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2005; 68(2): 261 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Minotti, P. Menna, E. Salvatorelli, G. Cairo, and L. Gianni Anthracyclines: Molecular Advances and Pharmacologic Developments in Antitumor Activity and Cardiotoxicity Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2004; 56(2): 185 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||