QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Salminen, O. Articles by Grady, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Salminen, O. Articles by Grady, S. R.

Subunit Composition and Pharmacology of Two Classes of Striatal Presynaptic Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mediating Dopamine Release in Mice

Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado (O.S., K.L.M., M.J.M., A.C.C., S.R.G.); Departments of Biology and Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (J.M.M.); and Howard Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia (J.D.)

Received January 16, 2004; accepted March 12, 2004

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Pharmacological evaluation of nicotine-stimulated dopamine release from striatum has yielded data consistent with activation of a single population of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR). However, discovery that -conotoxin MII (-CtxMII) partially inhibits the response indicates that two classes of presynaptic nAChRs mediate dopamine release. We have investigated the pharmacology and subunit composition of these two classes of nAChR. Inhibition of nicotine-stimulated dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes by -CtxMII occurs within minutes; recovery is slow. The IC₅₀ is 1 to 3 nM. -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant components have significant differences in pharmacology. The five agonists tested were more potent at activating the -CtxMII-sensitive nAChRs; indeed, this receptor is the highest affinity functional nAChR found, so far, in mouse brain. In addition, cytisine was more efficacious at the -CtxMII-sensitive sites. Methyllycaconitine was 9-fold more potent at inhibiting the -CtxMII-sensitive sites, whereas dihydro--erythroidine was a 7-fold more potent inhibitor of the -CtxMII-resistant response. Both the transient and persistent phases of nicotine-stimulated dopamine release were partially inhibited by -CtxMII with equal potency. The subunit composition of functional nAChRs, was assessed in mice with null mutations for individual nAChR subunits. The 2 subunit is an absolute requirement for both classes. In contrast, deletion of 4 or 7 subunits had no effect. The -CtxMII-sensitive response requires 3 and is partially dependent upon 4 subunits, probably 632 and 4632, whereas the -CtxMII-resistant release requires 4 and is partially dependent upon 5 subunits, probably 42 and 452.

Neuronal nAChR subunits form pentameric complexes, closely resembling the nAChR found at the neuromuscular junction (Leonard and Bertrand, 2001). Some of these receptors are homomeric (7), but most are heteromeric. Subunit composition of heteromeric nAChRs expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes or transfected cell lines has profound effects on agonist potency and efficacy as well as sensitivity to antagonists (Luetje and Patrick, 1991; Harvey and Luetje, 1996; Ramirez-Latorre et al., 1996; Chavez-Noriega et al., 1997; Kuryatov et al., 2000; Rush et al., 2002). Dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra that project to the striatum express detectable concentrations of mRNA for 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, and 3 subunits, as well as traces of 4 (Klink et al., 2001; Azam et al., 2002). Given that neuronal nAChRs are pentameric, the finding that the mRNAs for eight different nAChR subunits are expressed in dopaminergic neurons suggests that many structurally and functionally diverse nAChR subtypes might be expressed in these neurons.

Pharmacological evaluation of nicotinic agonist-evoked dopamine release from striatal synaptosomes of rodents has been consistent with activation of a single population of receptors (e.g., Rowell, 1995; Grady et al., 1997; Wonnacott, 1997). However, the demonstration that -conotoxin MII (-CtxMII) partially inhibits nicotinic agonist-induced dopamine release from striatal synaptosomes (Kulak et al., 1997; Kaiser et al., 1998; Grady et al., 2001) indicates that at least two nAChR populations, referred to as -CtxMII-resistant and -sensitive nAChRs, are expressed in striatal dopaminergic terminals. Recent studies have attempted to identify the subunit compositions of the -CtxMII-resistant and -sensitive nAChRs. The original characterization of -CtxMII demonstrated that the 32-nAChR subtype was the most sensitive to inhibition by -CtxMII of several nAChRs subtypes expressed in X. laevis oocytes (Cartier et al., 1996) (for nAChR nomenclature, see Lukas et al., 1999). However, 3 subunits do not contribute substantially to the -CtxMII binding sites found in nigrostriatal pathways (Whiteaker et al., 2002). Therefore, other subtypes that have high affinity for -CtxMII must exist in mouse brain. Indeed, 6^*-nAChRs expressed in oocytes have high affinity for -CtxMII (Kuryatov et al., 2000; Dowell et al., 2003) and ¹²⁵I--CtxMII binding in nigrostriatal pathways is absent in 6 null mutant mice (Champtiaux et al., 2002). Furthermore, striatal -CtxMII binding is decreased in 3- (Cui et al., 2003) and 4-null mutant mice (Marubio et al., 2003), indicating that these subunits are required for some receptor subtypes that bind -CtxMII with high affinity. Indeed, Champtiaux et al. (2003) reported the results of immunoprecipitation studies that used 4-, 6-, and 2-null mutant mice, as well as 6-hydroxydopamine-treated wild-type mice and concluded that three heteromeric nAChRs (42^*, 62^*, and 462^*) are expressed in dopaminergic nerve terminals. Consistent with these results, Zoli et al. (2002) concluded that nicotinic binding sites expressed in rat include 42, 452, 62(3), and 462(3). Function of nAChRs, measured by dopamine release, has been reported for 4-, 6-, 2-, and 3-null mutant mice, as well as 46 double-null mutants (Grady et al., 2001; Champtiaux et al., 2003; Cui et al., 2003). Selective loss of -CtxMII-sensitive function is seen in 6-/- and 3-/- mice. Selective loss of -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release is found in 4-/- mice, as well as virtually complete loss of all agonist-stimulated release activity in 2-/- and 46-/- mice. These results indicate that binding sites represent functional receptors.

We have evaluated the function of presynaptic nAChRs on striatal dopaminergic terminals derived from 4-/-, 5-/-, 7-/-, 2-/-, 3-/-, and 4-/- mice. Consistent with previous reports, our data suggest that as many as four different functional nAChRs are expressed in mouse striatal tissues. Two of these nAChRs are very sensitive to -CtxMII inhibition (probably 4623, 623) and two are not (probably 42, 452). In addition, -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant nAChRs have significant differences in pharmacological properties. The -CtxMII-sensitive subtypes have very high affinity function, nearly full activity when stimulated with cytisine, and a different profile of antagonist inhibition.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Materials. [³H]Dopamine was obtained from either PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA) (3,4-[ring-2,5,6-³H] at 30-60 Ci/mmol) or Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ) (7,8-³H at 40-60 Ci/mmol). HEPES and sucrose were products of Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, IN). Sigma Chemical, Co. (St. Louis, MO) was the source for the following compounds: acetylcholine iodide (ACh), ascorbic acid, atropine sulfate, A85380 [GenBank] , bovine serum albumin, cytisine, decamethonium chloride (DEC), dihydro--erythroidine (DHE), diisopropyl fluorophosphate, (±)-epibatidine hydrochloride, methyllycaconitine (MLA), (-)-nicotine tartrate, nomifensine, and pargyline. -CtxMII was synthesized as described previously (Cartier et al., 1996). All other chemicals were reagent grade. Econo-Safe scintillation fluid was purchased from Research Products International (Mt. Prospect, IL).

Animals. Animal care and experimental procedures were in accordance with the guidelines and approval of the Animal Care and Utilization Committee of the University of Colorado, Boulder. Female C57BL/6 mice (60-90 days of age), as well as all genotypes of the subunit null mutant mice, were bred at the Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado (Boulder, CO), housed five to a cage with same-sex littermates, and maintained on a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle (lights on from 7 AM to 7 PM), at 22°C, with free access to food (Teklad Rodent Diet; Harlan, Madison, WI) and water. All nAChR subunit null mutant mice were bred onto the C57BL/6 strain for the indicated number of generations: 2 (Picciotto et al., 1995) six to eight generations; 4 (Ross et al., 2000), one generation; 5 (Salas et al., 2003), six generations; 4 (Xu et al., 1999), four to six generations; 7 (Orr-Urtreger et al., 1997), eight to nine generations; and 3 (Cui et al., 2003), nine generations. All breeding was conducted by mating heterozygotic male and female mice. Offspring were weaned at 25 days of age and housed with same-sex littermates, 2 to 5 to a cage, thereafter.

Genotype of above-mentioned mice was determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis of DNA obtained from tail clippings of mice at 40 days of age. DNA was extracted from these tail clippings using the DNeasy kit from QIAGEN (Valencia, CA) and analyzed by polymerase chain reaction for assignment of genotype.

The following primers were used to determine 2 genotype: 2 wild-type 5', 5'-GCTTCAAACCTCTCCACGTC-3'; 2 wild-type 3', 5'CGCCATAGAGTTGGAGCACC-3'; LacZ 5', 5' CACTACGTCTGAACGTCGAAAA-3'; and LacZ 3', 5'-CGGGCAAATAATATCGGTGGC-3'. Amplification was achieved through the following protocol: 94° for 10 min, 94° for 30 s, 65° for 30 s (touch down, 2°/two cycles to 55°), 72° for 1 min; 30 cycles at 94° for 30 s, 55° for 30 s, and 72° for 1 min; 72° for 7 min; hold at 4°. Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel. The approximate sizes of the wild-type and mutant bands were 400 and 600 bp, respectively.

The following primers were used to determine 4 genotype: 4 wild-type 5', 5'-CAATGTACACAACCGCTCAC-3'; 4 wild-type 3', 5'-ACTGCTATTGGGTGGGTGAC-3'; Neo 5', 5'-CTTGGGTGGAGAGGCTATTC-3'; and Neo 3', 5'-AGGTGAGATGACAGGAGATC-3'. Amplification was achieved through the following protocol: 95° for 7 min, 25 cycles of 94° for 1 min, 55° for 2 min, 72° for 3 min, 72° for 7 min; hold at 4°. Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel. The approximate sizes of the wild-type and mutant bands were 385 and 280 bp, respectively.

The following primers were used to determine 5 genotype:

5 wild-type 5', 5'-CACTGTCACTTGGACGCAGCC-3'; 5 wild-type 3', 5'-GTTCCCCTTGCTCCCCATTGC-3'; Neo-1, 5'-CTTTTTGTCAAGACCGACCTGTCCG-3'; and Neo-2, 5'-CTCGATGCGATGTTTCGCTTGGTG-3'. Amplification was achieved through the following protocol: 94° for 10 min, 94° for 30 s, 65° for 30 s (touch down, 2°/two cycles to 55°), 72° for 1 min; 30 cycles at 94° for 30 s, 55° for 30 s, and 72° for 1 min; 72° for 7 min; hold at 4°. Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel. The approximate sizes of the wild-type and mutant bands were 380 and 290 bp, respectively.

The following primers were used to determine 3 genotype:

3 5', 5'-GGGCTCTCTCATGACCAAGG-3'; 3 3', 5'-GTATCTGATGGACTCAGAGGCC-3'; LacZ 5', 5'-CACTACGTCTGAACGTCGAAAA-3'; and

LacZ 3', 5'-CGGGCAAATAATATCGGTGGC-3'. Amplification was achieved through the following protocol: 94° for 10 min; 30 cycles of 94° for 1 min, 60° for 1 min, 72° for 1 min; 72° for 7 min; hold at 4°. Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel. The approximate sizes of the wild-type and mutant bands were 850 and 600 bp, respectively.

The following primers were used to determine 4 genotype: 4 forward, 5'-TGTAGAGCGAGCATCCGAACA-3'; 4 wild-type reverse, 5'-TCTCTACTTAGGCTGCCTGTCT-3'; and 4 mutant reverse, 5'-AGTACCTTCTGAGGCGGAAAGA-3'. Amplification was achieved through the following protocol: 94° for 10 min, 94° for 30 s, 65° for 30 s (touch down, 2°/two cycles to 55°), 72° for 1 min; 30 cycles at 94° for 30 s, 55° for 30 s, and 72° for 1 min; 72° for 7 min; hold at 4°. Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel. The approximate sizes of the wild-type and mutant bands were 300 and 150 bp, respectively.

The following primers were used to determine 7 genotype: 7 wild-type forward, 5'-CCTGGTCCTGCTGTGTTAAACTGCTTC-3'; 7 wild-type reverse, 5'-CTGCTGGGAAATCCTAGGCACACTTGAG-3'; and Neo (reverse), 5'-GACAAGACCGGCTTCCATCC-3'. Amplification was achieved through the following protocol: 94° for 10 min; 30 cycles of 94° for 1 min, 60° for 1 min, 72° for 1 min; 72° for 7 min; hold at 4°. Samples were then subjected to electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel. The approximate sizes of the wild-type and mutant bands were 444 and 750 bp, respectively.

Synaptosome Preparation. After a mouse was sacrificed by cervical dislocation, its brain was removed and placed immediately on ice, and the striatum was dissected free of the remainder of the brain tissue. The striatal tissue from each mouse was homogenized in 0.5 ml of ice-cold 0.32 M sucrose buffered with 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5. The P2 synaptosomal pellet was prepared by centrifugation at 1000g for 10 min followed by centrifugation of the first supernatant at 12,000g for 20 min. For many experiments, a P1 pellet was used that omitted the first lower speed centrifugation. Experiments with P1 or P2 pellets gave identical results. The pellets were resuspended in 0.8 ml (P2) or 1.6 ml (P1) of "uptake buffer": 128 mM NaCl, 2.4 mM KCl, 3.2 mM CaCl_2, 1.2 mM KH₂PO₄, 1.2 mM MgSO₄, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM ascorbic acid, and 0.01 mM pargyline.

Uptake of [³H]Dopamine. Synaptosomes were incubated at 37° in uptake buffer for 10 min before addition of 100 nM [³H]dopamine (1 µCi for every 0.2 ml of synaptosomes), and the suspension was incubated for an additional 5 min.

Perfusion and Release. All experiments were conducted at room temperature using methods described previously (Grady et al., 1997, 2001). In brief, aliquots of synaptosomes (80 µl) were distributed onto filters and perfused with the perfusion buffer (uptake buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 10 µM nomifensine) at 0.6 or 1 ml/min for 10 min before fractions were collected. For experiments using ACh as agonist, the synaptosomes were treated with diisopropyl fluorophosphate (10 µM) during the last 5 min of the uptake procedure, and atropine (1 µM) was added to the perfusion buffer. Fractions (0.3 ml) were collected every 18 or 30 s depending on the perfusion speed, and radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting (1600TR Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences) after addition of Econo-Safe (Research Products International). Instrument efficiency was 45%.

Data Analysis. Data were fit to equations below using the curve-fitting algorithm of SigmaPlot 5.0 for DOS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Perfusion data were plotted as counts per minute versus fraction number. Fractions collected immediately before and after the peak were used to calculate baseline as a single exponential decay. The calculated baseline was subtracted from the data obtained when agonists were added. Fractions that exceeded baseline by 10% or more were summed to give total released cpm. Counts per minute released above baseline were normalized to baseline to give units of release [(cpm - baseline)/baseline] (Grady et al., 1997, 2001). When agonist exposure is prolonged (minutes), nicotinic agonist-induced dopamine release can be divided into two components, transient (rapidly desensitizing) and persistent (slowly desensitizing) (Grady et al., 1997). Transient and persistent release parameters were calculated by fitting the data to a double exponential decay equation (Grady et al., 1997). Onset of and recovery from the effects of -CtxMII were calculated from single exponential equations: release = R₀(e^-kt) + R_r and release = R₀(1 - e^-kt) + R_r, where R₀ is initial release and R_r is the portion of release uninhibited by -CtxMII. Agonist dose response data were fit to the Hill equation using SigmaPlot 5.0 DOS version (SPSS Inc.) (Grady et al., 2001). Errors for EC₅₀ values were assessed by fitting the data to the Hill equation with R_max and n_H fixed to values obtained from the initial fit to the Hill equation. Errors for ratios were calculated using Taylor's expansion. IC₅₀ values for inhibition of release were calculated by fitting the data to single-site inhibition (release = R₀/(1 + [An]/IC₅₀) where R₀ is uninhibited release and [An] is the antagonist concentration) (Grady et al., 2001). K_i values were determined by fitting the data using SigmaPlot 5.0 DOS version and assuming inhibitors were competitive (release = (R_max)([L-nicotine]/(EC₅₀(1 + [I]/K_i) + [L-nicotine])) using the EC₅₀ values for nicotine previously determined (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1 EC50 values and Rmax values for -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant agonist-stimulated dopamine release

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Effect of -CtxMII on Dopamine Release. To investigate the kinetics of inhibition by -CtxMII, a concentration of 30 nM -CtxMII was chosen for preliminary experiments of inhibition of dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes based on studies done with different nAChR subtypes expressed in X. laevis oocytes (Cartier et al., 1996). This concentration has been reported to inhibit nicotinic receptors with high affinity for -CtxMII and minimally affect those with lower affinity, such as the 42 subtype of nicotinic receptor (Cartier et al., 1996). Figure 1 presents the onset of, and recovery from, -CtxMII inhibition. Synaptosomes were treated with 30 nM -CtxMII for 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, or 10 min before exposure to L-nicotine (1 µM) plus -CtxMII (30 nM) for 1 min. [³H]Dopamine release under these conditions was compared with that elicited by L-nicotine alone. -CtxMII produced its maximum effect quickly, with a t_1/2 of 0.69 min. For recovery experiments, synaptosomes were exposed to 30 nM -CtxMII for 5 min followed by buffer without -CtxMII for the indicated time intervals before the L-nicotine stimulation. The release evoked by L-nicotine under these conditions was compared with that evoked from synaptosomes that had not been exposed to -CtxMII. Recovery is quite slow; calculated t_1/2 is 25.7 min. -CtxMII had no stimulatory or inhibitory effect on the baseline release of [³H]dopamine and no effect on release evoked by 20 mM K⁺ (data not shown). From these data, it was determined that 5 min of exposure was sufficient to ensure maximal inhibition, and that for a short exposure to agonist (1 min or less), recovery from inhibition should not occur even if -CtxMII is not included with the agonist.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Onset of inhibition and recovery from inhibition by -CtxMII. a, dopamine release was stimulated by L-nicotine (1 µM for 1 min) with the indicated length of exposure to -CtxMII (30 nM). The amount of dopamine release was compared with parallel filters where release was stimulated by nicotine alone without exposure to -CtxMII (0 min of exposure time). The Konset is 1.01 ± 0.21/min; t1/2 = 0.69 min. b, synaptosomes were perfused for 5 min with -CtxMII (30 nM) followed by perfusion buffer for the indicated interval. Dopamine release was then stimulated by L-nicotine (1 µM for 1 min) and compared with filters perfused for the same length of time without the exposure to -CtxMII. The Krecovery is 0.027 ± 0.002/min; t1/2 = 25.7 min.

An inhibition curve for determining the potency and efficacy for -CtxMII is shown in Fig. 2. For this curve, release was evoked with 10 µM L-nicotine for 18 s. The IC₅₀ value is 2.2 ± 0.5 nM; maximum inhibition is 31%. Experiments done using different concentrations of L-nicotine (data not shown) revealed that the IC₅₀ values for -CtxMII did not differ with varying L-nicotine concentration. The mean of IC₅₀ values determined at six L-nicotine concentrations (ranging from 0.1-30 µM) was 2.8 ± 0.9 nM. This result does not imply that -CtxMII is acting noncompetitively, but rather reflects the fact that samples were exposed to -CtxMII before L-nicotine, and the toxin has a slow off-time (Fig. 1 and Whiteaker et al., 2000).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Inhibition of dopamine release by -CtxMII. Synaptosomes were perfused with -CtxMII of the indicated concentration for 5 min just before an 18-s exposure of L-nicotine (10 µM). n = 5 experiments. IC50 = 2.2 ± 0.5 nM; maximum inhibition = 31.0 ± 3.8%.

Pharmacology of -CtxMII-Sensitive and -Resistant nAChRs. The potency and efficacy of a number of nicotinic agonists for [³H]dopamine release mediated by the -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant nAChRs were investigated by constructing dose response curves with and without prior exposure to a maximally effective concentration of -CtxMII (50 nM) for 5 min (Fig. 3); a to e show response to ACh, A85380 [GenBank] , cytisine, epibatidine, and nicotine, respectively, for -CtxMII-resistant and -sensitive portions of stimulated dopamine release. The data were fit to the Hill equation, and the parameters calculated are presented in Table 1. The rank order of potency for -CtxMII-sensitive release (epibatidine > A85380 [GenBank] > cytisine > ACh > nicotine) differed slightly from the rank order for -CtxMII-resistant release (A85380 [GenBank] > epibatidine > cytisine > ACh > nicotine) in that epibatidine and A85380 [GenBank] changed positions in the rank order. However, the EC₅₀ values for all of the agonists were significantly lower for the -CtxMII-sensitive release and the ratio of EC₅₀ values for -CtxMII-resistant to -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release for the five agonists varied considerably (from 2 for nicotine to 15 for epibatidine and cytisine). The rank order of efficacy, or maximal release (R_max), differed for the two components of the release process: (-CtxMII-sensitive: epibatidine > nicotine > A85380 [GenBank] ACh > cytisine; -CtxMII-resistant: epibatidine > ACh > nicotine A85380 [GenBank] >> cytisine). Compared with ACh, nicotine and A85380 [GenBank] were approximately equally efficacious, and epibatidine was somewhat more efficacious, for both -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant release. However, cytisine was a partial agonist for the -CtxMII-resistant release (33% as efficacious as acetylcholine) with a low Hill coefficient. In contrast, for the -CtxMII-sensitive response, it was nearly as efficacious as acetylcholine (85%).

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Stimulation of dopamine release by various nicotinic agonists. Synaptosomes were perfused with buffer or -CtxMII (50 nM) for 5 min before an 18-s exposure to the indicated concentration of agonist. Dopamine release resistant to inhibition by -CtxMII was determined by release stimulated after exposure to -CtxMII. The amount of nAChR-mediated dopamine release sensitive to -CtxMII was determined from the difference between release evoked with and without prior exposure to -CtxMII. All data are shown as percentage maximal response to ACh. Lines are curve fits to the Hill equation. n = 3 to 9 animals assayed per point. Errors shown are SEM. a, b, c, d, and e show release stimulated by ACh, A-85380, cytisine, epibatidine, and nicotine, respectively.

Three nicotinic antagonists, DEC, MLA, and DHE, were investigated for their effects on the -CtxMII-resistant and -sensitive portions of [³H]dopamine release. Inhibition of dopamine release by each antagonist was evaluated using three L-nicotine concentrations (1, 3, and 10 µM) and the results are shown in Fig. 4. All of the antagonists totally blocked both -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant release at each nicotine concentration. The antagonists seem to be competitive inhibitors, as demonstrated by the finding that the IC₅₀ values for all three antagonists increased with increasing agonist concentration. The IC₅₀ values and K_i values, calculated assuming competitive inhibition, are presented in Table 2. K_i values for MLA and DHE differed significantly for inhibition of -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant dopamine release stimulated by nicotine. The rank order of antagonist potency also differed when K_i values were compared (-CtxMII-sensitive release, MLA < DHE < DEC; -CtxMII-resistant release, DHE < MLA < DEC). In addition, the ratios of K_i values differed considerably; MLA is a 9-fold more potent inhibitor of -CtxMII-sensitive release, and DHE is a 7-fold more potent inhibitor of -CtxMII-resistant release.

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Inhibition of nicotine-stimulated dopamine release by nicotinic antagonists. a, b, and c present data on inhibition by DHE, DEC, and MLA, respectively, of -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release determined from synaptosomes perfused with -CtxMII (50 nM) for 5 min before an 18-s exposure to the indicated concentration of L-nicotine with or without antagonist. d, e, and f show data for inhibition by DHE, DEC, and MLA, respectively for the portion of dopamine release sensitive to -CtxMII, determined by difference. n = 3 to 4 animals assayed per point; error bars show S.E.M.

Effect of -CtxMII on Transient and Persistent Release. Agonist-stimulated dopamine release occurs in two phases, a larger but more rapidly desensitizing phase (transient release) and a sustained low level release (persistent release) (Rowell, 1995; Grady et al., 1997). Persistent release is supported by very low concentrations of agonist with EC₅₀ values similar to those measured for -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release. Therefore, it seemed possible that the -CtxMII-sensitive release might coincide with persistent release, whereas -CtxMII-resistant release might be equivalent to the transient release. Figure 5 compares synaptosomes perfused with -CtxMII (30 nM) for 5 min before treatment with L-nicotine (1 µM) and -CtxMII for 10 min with those perfused with buffer before L-nicotine alone. Treatment with -CtxMII decreased transient release, elicited by 1 µM L-nicotine, by 45%, and persistent release by 55%. Therefore, both receptor classes support both phases of release. IC₅₀ values for -CtxMII inhibition of transient and persistent release were determined by exposing synaptosomes to various concentrations of -CtxMII for 5 min before and during stimulation with 1 µM L-nicotine for 10 min. Two plots were constructed from the results of these experiments (Fig. 6), the first as the transient response obtained from the double-exponential curve fit procedure and the second as the persistent response, also derived from the curve fit. The IC₅₀ values are similar: 1.3 ± 1.1 nM for the transient response and 1.1 ± 0.8 nM for the persistent response, not different from the value determined for short exposures to nicotine 2.2 ± 0.5 nM (see Fig. 2).

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Effect of -CtxMII on transient and persistent nicotine-stimulated dopamine release. Representative data from two filters are shown. Striatal synaptosomes previously loaded with [3H]dopamine were perfused with buffer at 0.6 ml/min for 10 min before collecting fractions of 30 s each. The control filter (no exposure to -CtxMII) has been offset by 2000 cpm for clarity. Perfusion with -CtxMII (30 nM) was started 5 min before L-nicotine for the filter with -CtxMII treatment. Perfusion with -CtxMII plus L-nicotine (1 µM) or L-nicotine alone was started and ended where indicated. Transient release from the synaptosomes without -CtxMII treatment was 4.88 units; in the -CtxMII-treated synaptosomes, transient release was reduced to 2.68 units (a 45% decrease). The persistent phase of release was 0.76 units in the untreated synaptosomes, whereas in the treated synaptosomes, there were 0.34 units of persistent release (a 55% decrease).

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Inhibition of transient and persistent dopamine release by -CtxMII. Aliquots of synaptosomes were perfused (0.6 ml/min) for 5 min with varying concentrations of -CtxMII, after which time they were perfused with -CtxMII of the same concentration containing 1 µM L-nicotine for 10 min. Perfusion was continued with buffer only for an additional 5 min. Fractions were collected every 30 s. See Fig. 5 for representative experiment. Data are presented as percentage of control. Transient dopamine release was determined by curve fit. The IC50 value is 1.3 ± 1.1 nM with a maximum inhibition of 38 ± 10%. Persistent release, also determined by curve fit, resulted in an IC50 value of 1.1 ± 0.8 nM with a maximum inhibition of 44 ± 10%.

Effects of Subunit Deletion on -CtxMII-Resistant [³H]Dopamine Release. For measurement of -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release, samples of synaptosomes from the wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/-), and homozygous (-/-) null mutant mice for six nAChR subunits were assayed with exposure to -CtxMII before stimulation of dopamine release by acetylcholine, the natural agonist. Synaptosomes were treated with -CtxMII (50 nM) for 5 min before agonist stimulation. This procedure ensured maximal inhibition by -CtxMII. Figure 7 presents the dose-response curves for ACh-induced -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release. None of the R_max values determined in wild-type mice were different from that determined in C57BL/6 mice (Table 1). All 5 genotypes had an EC₅₀ value for ACh that was slightly lower than that measured for C57BL/6 mice; no other genotypes differed from the C57BL/6 mice. Four of the null mutants showed changes in R_max for the -CtxMII-resistant component of dopamine release. Both 2-and 4-null mutation abolished all of the -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release whereas 5-null mutation resulted in a significant (63%) decrease in -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release. In contrast, -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release increased somewhat in 3-/- mice. No change was seen in this component of dopamine release in either 4-/- or 7-/- mice compared with corresponding wild-type mice. The -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release was similar in mice heterozygous for each of these subunits compared with the appropriate wild-type mice, except for 2+/- mice, which tended to be lower, but this effect was not significant for this data set. None of the gene deletions resulted in a change in the EC₅₀ value for ACh compared with the wild-type for each mutation. Table 3 presents a summary of the effects of different null mutations on the EC₅₀ values, R_max values and Hill coefficients.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Effects of subunit deletion on -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release. Aliquots of synaptosomes prepared from the indicated genotypes of mouse striatal tissue were perfused (1 ml/min) for 5 min with -CtxMII (50 nM) before exposure to ACh for 18 s to stimulate release. n = number of mice assayed. Data points are means ± S.E.M. One-way analysis of variance followed by least-significant-difference post hoc test indicated some significant effects of genotype; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 3 The effect of genotype on -CtxMII resistant dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes The Rmax, EC50, and nH values of each genotype are presented. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M.

Effects of Subunit Deletion on -CtxMII-Sensitive [³H]Dopamine Release. For measurement of -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release, parallel samples of synaptosomes were assayed without exposure to -CtxMII along with those with exposure to -CtxMII (see above paragraph). Release sensitive to -CtxMII was determined by the difference between these two conditions. Figure 8 presents the effects of the gene deletions on -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release. R_max and EC₅₀ values for the six sets of wild-type mice did not differ from those determined in C57BL/6 mice (Table 1). Four of the null mutations differed in R_max for ACh-stimulated -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release. 2-null mutation resulted in complete loss of -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release and 4 gene deletion decreased the -CtxMII-sensitive component of dopamine release by 55%. In 5-null mutant mice, the -CtxMII-sensitive release was slightly elevated to 162% of wild type. The 3-null mutation resulted in a 76% decrease from wild type. Neither 4 nor 7 gene deletion altered this component of dopamine release. The 2+/- is the only heterozygous genotype that exhibited a change (50% decrease) in -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release. Table 4 presents a summary of the effects of different null mutations on the EC₅₀ values, R_max values, and Hill coefficients.

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Effects of subunit deletion on -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release. Aliquots of synaptosomes prepared from the indicated genotypes of mouse striatal tissue were perfused (1 ml/min) for 5 min with and without -CtxMII (50 nM) before exposure to ACh for 18 s to stimulate release. The portion of stimulated release sensitive to -CtxMII was determined by difference. n = number of mice assayed. Data points are means ± S.E.M. One-way analysis of variance followed by least-significant-difference post hoc test indicated some significant effects of genotype; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 4 The effect of genotype on -CtxMII sensitive dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes Rmax, EC50, and nH values of each genotype are presented. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M.

Effects of Subunit Deletion on K⁺-Stimulated [³H]Dopamine Release. The potential effects of 4, 5, 7, 2, 3, and 4 gene deletion on dopamine release stimulated by 20 mM potassium ion (K⁺) were also determined (data not shown). Neither the gene deletions nor the different genotypes changed the K⁺-induced dopamine release with or without -CtxMII pretreatment. Furthermore, baselines and counts per minute remaining on filters were not affected by any of the genotypes or null mutations (data not shown). These results indicate that each genotype in each null mutant mouse line has normal synaptic vesicle-mediated release stimulated by membrane depolarization.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In the present study, we analyzed the pharmacology of two classes of nAChRs differentiated by the ability of CtxMII to inhibit agonist-mediated dopamine release. In addition, the effect of deletion of nAChR subunits (4, 5, 7, 2, 3, and 4) was evaluated to elucidate potential subunit composition of these functional receptors.

-CtxMII inhibited nicotine-stimulated [³H]dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes by 35 to 45%, results similar to previous studies with rat or mouse (Kulak et al., 1997; Kaiser et al., 1998; Champtiaux et al., 2003). The IC₅₀ value of 1 to 3 nM and the kinetics of onset (t_1/2 of 0.69 min at 30 nM) and recovery (t_1/2 of 25.7 min) are similar to those determined for functional measures of rat 62^* nAChRs expressed in oocytes (Dowell et al., 2003; McIntosh, 2004). Agonist-stimulated dopamine release occurs in two phases, a rapidly desensitizing phase (transient) and a sustained, low level, release (persistent) (Rowell, 1995; Grady et al., 1997), probably a result of activation of different receptor states as proposed by the two-state receptor model of Katz and Thesleff (1957). Both the transient and persistent phases of nicotine-stimulated dopamine release were partially inhibited by -CtxMII, with identical IC₅₀ values. This result indicates that both transient and persistent phases of presynaptic dopamine release are mediated by at least two subclasses of nAChRs (those that are inhibited by -CtxMII and those that are not).

The rank order of potency of five agonists tested for stimulating -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant dopamine release differed only for epibatidine and A85380 [GenBank] , suggesting that the receptors that mediate this neurotransmitter release have similar pharmacology. However, all agonists tested were significantly more potent for activation of the -CtxMII-sensitive component and, in addition, the relative potencies for activation of -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant components varied considerably (from 2 for nicotine to 15 for epibatidine and cytisine), demonstrating that there are significant pharmacological differences for the two components. Epibatidine was the most efficacious agonist tested for both responses and cytisine the least. However, although cytisine was the least efficacious compound for stimulating both release responses, it was a weak partial agonist for the -CtxMII-resistant release (33% of ACh) and a nearly full agonist for -CtxMII-sensitive response (85% of ACh). The order of potency of three nicotinic antagonists tested differed for the two classes of nAChRs, and K_i values differed for DHE and MLA. DHE was 7-fold more potent for the -CtxMII-resistant subtype and MLA was 9-fold more potent at inhibiting the -CtxMII-sensitive release. Thus, the nAChRs that mediate the -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant components of dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes clearly have different pharmacology.

Combining genetic and pharmacological tools, we were able to examine which subunits are involved in the two classes of functional, presynaptic receptors. As reported previously, mice homozygous for the 2-null mutation no longer have any functional, presynaptic nAChRs on dopaminergic terminals of the striatum (Grady et al., 2001). The 2 subunit seems, therefore, to be a necessary component of all these receptors. Mice heterozygous for the 2 subunit exhibit decreased -CtxMII-sensitive dopamine release (47% of +/+) and only slightly decreased -CtxMII-resistant release (79% of +/+). Perhaps under conditions of limited numbers of 2 subunits, the -CtxMII-resistant receptors are preferentially assembled. On the other hand, the function of -CtxMII-resistant receptors may not be decreased much because of spare receptor phenomena (i.e., when the maximum response can be elicited by activation of fewer receptors than are actually present in the wild-type mouse). In such a case, loss of some receptors may not result in the expected loss of response.

Mice homozygous for the 7- or the 4-null mutation do not differ from wild-type mice in either class of agonist-stimulated dopamine release. Consequently, neither of these subunits is an obligatory component of the dopaminergic, presynaptic receptor pool. These results are not unexpected. -Bungarotoxin does not inhibit agonist-stimulated dopamine release from synaptosomes (Grady et al., 1997). The homomeric 7 subtype is inhibited by low nanomolar concentrations of MLA that do not significantly inhibit dopamine release (K_i values for MLA of 2.62 µM and 280 nM for the two components; Table 2). Therefore, the homomeric 7 subtype is not likely to mediate this response. The very low 4-mRNA levels in substantia nigra (Azam et al., 2002; Klink et al., 2001), indicate that the 4 subunit is not a likely component of many of the presynaptic receptors mediating dopamine release. Indeed, -conotoxin AuIB, selective for the 34 subtype of nAChR (Luo et al., 1998), does not inhibit dopamine release (Grady et al., 2001).

Deletion of 4, 5, or 3 nAChR subunits have selective effects on nAChR-mediated dopamine release, indicating that each of these subunits is included in specific subsets of receptor populations.

Deletion of the 4 subunit eliminates -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release. This result substantiates the loss of -CtxMII-resistant dopamine release function reported in another line of 4-null mutant mice (Champtiaux et al., 2003). Therefore, -CtxMII-resistant nAChRs presynaptic to dopaminergic terminals are all of the 42^* subtype. In addition, the 4 subunit deletion affects a portion of the -CtxMII-sensitive response, consistent with the decrease in -CtxMII binding reported by Marubio et al. (2003). 42 nAChR does not have a high affinity for -CtxMII (Cartier et al., 1996), thus -CtxMII-sensitive receptors that contain 4 and 2 subunits must contain other subunits as well.

The 3 subunit seems to be a component of most of the -CtxMII-sensitive nAChRs on dopaminergic terminals. 3-/- mice showed substantially decreased -CtxMII-sensitive ACh-evoked dopamine release (24% of +/+), whereas -CtxMII-resistant ACh-stimulated response was increased (122% of +/+). These results are consistent with values obtained using nicotine as agonist (-CtxMII-sensitive, 20% of +/+; -CtxMII-resistant, 193% of +/+ reported by Cui et al., 2003). The increase in the -CtxMII-resistant response is, perhaps, some type of physiological compensation.

Deletion of the 5 subunit decreased -CtxMII-resistant release by 63%, indicating that in the wild-type mouse, a substantial portion of the 42^* nAChR that mediates dopamine release is 452 nAChR. It is possible that in the wild-type mouse, all of the -CtxMII-resistant nAChR is 452 nAChR and that some 42 nAChR is produced in 5-/- mice instead of the normal 452 nAChR. However, immunoprecipitation studies in the rat indicate that a considerable population of 42 without 5 does occur in dopaminergic terminals (Zoli et al., 2002). Therefore, the remaining -CtxMII-resistant activity in 5-null mutant mice may not represent a compensatory change. The -CtxMII-sensitive portion of dopamine release measured in the homozygous 5 null mutant is increased (162% of control), indicating that some amount of functional compensation can occur (also seen with the 3 null mutation), perhaps as a result of extra 4 subunits, which can then assemble as other receptor subtypes.

Combining the data from these six null mutant mouse lines with data published previously on 6- (Champtiaux et al., 2002, 2003) and 3- (Whiteaker et al., 2002) null mutants demonstrates that functional receptors for both the -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant classes are heterogeneous and that 452 nAChRs and 42 nAChRs comprise the -CtxMII-resistant class of receptors, whereas 632 and 4632 nAChRs with possibly a small amount of 62 or 462 nAChRs comprise the -CtxMII-sensitive class. Data from these functional assays agree with subunit compositions determined by immunological analyses (Zoli et al., 2002).

In summary, pharmacological differences for the -CtxMII-sensitive and -resistant nAChRs, which mediate presynaptic dopamine release, indicate that there are multiple nAChRs at dopaminergic nerve terminals, and that these different subtypes of nAChRs have different pharmacological properties. Although variation in potency, rank order, and efficacy of agonists and antagonists may not predict physiologically important functional differences for the nAChR subtypes (Le Novere et al., 2002), these differences do indicate that it may be possible to selectively activate, inhibit, or desensitize the various nAChRs. The -CtxMII-sensitive nAChRs show a distinct and limited anatomical distribution (Whiteaker et al., 2000) and have the highest affinity functional activation for nAChRs in the brain identified to this point. All dopaminergic terminal regions display significant expression of these receptors. Within at least one of these dopaminergic regions, the striatum, it seems that the -CtxMII-sensitive nAChR population is restricted to the dopaminergic terminals, and this receptor subtype(s) is not found on terminals that release other neurotransmitters (Zoli et al., 2002; Champtiaux et al., 2003; Quik et al., 2003). The -CtxMII-sensitive 6^* nAChRs also seem to be sparse in the dopaminergic cell body regions, SN/VTA (Champtiaux et al., 2003). Drugs selective for various nAChR subtypes could influence selective sets of neurons and possibly certain regions of neurons. Therefore, by selective activation or inhibition of the subtypes sensitive to -CtxMII, dopamine release might be modulated without affecting release of other neurotransmitters. This possibility of selectively targeting certain classes of neurons might produce therapeutically useful treatments for conditions in which dopaminergic neurons have a role, such as drug abuse or Parkinson's disease.

	Acknowledgements

 
We thank Natalie M. Meinerz, Jennifer A. Drapeau, and Julie J. Kachinski for technical assistance with genotyping.

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grants DA00197 (to A.C.C.), DA03194 (to A.C.C.), DA12242 (to M.J.M.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism grant A-011156 (to A.C.C.), National Institute of Mental Health grant MH53631 (to J.M.M.), Colorado Tobacco Research Grant 3F-034 (to O.S.), a Finnish Cultural Foundation grant (to O.S.), and by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (J.D.). Production of the null mutant mice was supported by animal resources grant DA015663 [GenBank] from NIDA (to A.C.C.).

Portions of this work have been presented previously in abstract form: Grady SR, McIntosh JM, Marks MJ, and Collins AC (1997) Effects of -conotoxin MII on nicotine-stimulated dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23:671; Grady SR, Murphy KL, Marks MJ, McIntosh JM, Heinemann, SF, and Collins AC (2000) Characterization of dopamine release mediated by the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor inhibited by -conotoxin MII. Soc Neurosci Abstr 26:901; Salminen OS, Grady SR, McIntosh JM, Paylor R, Marks MJ, and Collins AC (2002) Effect of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor 5 subunit null mutation on [³H]dopamine release: comparison to other nAChR null Mutations. Soc Neurosci Abstr online; and Salminen OS, Grady SR, McCallum SE, Marks MJ, and Collins AC (2003) Effect of alpha4 nAChR subunit null mutation on agonist-evoked neurotransmitter release. Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 9^th annual meeting program, page 53.

ABBREVIATIONS: nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; -CtxMII, -conotoxin MII; ACh, acetylcholine iodide; A85380 [GenBank] , 3-[2-(S)-azetidinylmethoxy]pyridine; DEC, decamethonium chloride; DHE, dihydro--erythroidine; MLA, methyllycaconitine; bp, base pair(s).

¹ Current address: Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Address correspondence to: Sharon R. Grady, Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, 447UCB, Boulder, CO 80309. E-mail: sharon.grady{at}colorado.edu

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Azam L, Winzer-Serhan UH, Chen Y, and Leslie FM (2002) Expression of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNAs within midbrain dopamine neurons. J Comp Neurol 444: 260-274.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cartier GE, Yoshikami D, Gray WR, Luo S, Olivera BM, and McIntosh JM (1996) A new -conotoxin which targets 32 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Biol Chem 271: 7522-7528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Champtiaux N, Han Z-Y, Bessis A, Rossi FM, Zoli M, Marubio L, McIntosh JM, and Changeux J-P (2002) Distribution and pharmacology of 6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors analyzed with mutant mice. J Neurosci 22: 1208-1217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Champtiaux N, Gotti C, Cordero-Erausquin M, David DJ, Przybylski C, Lena C, Clementi F, Moretti M, Rossi FM, Le Novere N, et al. (2003) Subunit composition of functional nicotinic receptors in dopaminergic neurons investigated with knockout mice. J Neurosci 23: 7820-7829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chavez-Noriega LE, Crona JH, Washburn MS, Urrutia A, Elliott KJ, and Johnson EC (1997) Pharmacological characterization of recombinant human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors h22, h24, h32, h34, h42, h44 and h7 expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 280: 346-356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cui C, Booker TK, Allen RS, Grady SR, Whiteaker P, Marks MJ, Salminen O, Tritto T, Butt CM, Allen WR, et al. (2003) The 3 nicotinic receptor subunit: a component of -conotoxin MII binding nAChRs which modulate dopamine release and related behaviors. J. Neurosci 23: 11045-11053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dowell C, Olivera BM, Garrett JE, Staheli ST, Watkins M, Kuryatov A, Yoshikami D, Lindstrom JM, and McIntosh JM (2003) -Conotoxin P1A is selective for 6 subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurosci 23: 8445-8452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grady SR, Grun EU, Marks MJ, and Collins AC (1997) Pharmacological comparison of transient and persistent [³H]dopamine release from mouse striatal synaptosomes and response to chronic L-nicotine treatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282: 32-43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grady SR, Meinerz NM, Cao J, Reynolds AM, Picciotto MR, Changeux J-P, McIntosh JM, Marks MJ, and Collins AC (2001) Nicotinic agonists stimulate acetylcholine release from mouse interpeduncular nucleus: a function mediated by a different nAChR than dopamine release from striatum. J Neurochem 76: 258-268.[CrossRef]