MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on June 10, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.001503


0026-895X/04/6603-387-394$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 66:387-394, 2004

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.001503v1
66/3/387    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartz, A. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartz, A. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. S.

Rapid Regulation of P-Glycoprotein at the Blood-Brain Barrier by Endothelin-1

Anika M. S. Hartz, Björn Bauer, Gert Fricker, and David S. Miller

Laboratory of Pharmacology and Chemistry, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (A.M.S.H., B.B., D.S.M.); and Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.S.H., G.F.)

Received April 16, 2004; accepted June 3, 2004


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The ATP-driven xenobiotic transporter P-glycoprotein is a critical element of the blood-brain barrier. To study regulation of P-glycoprotein function, we measured specific transport [(3'-oxo-4-butenyl-4-methyl-threonine(1), (valine(2)) cyclosporin (PSC833)-sensitive] of the fluorescent cyclosporin A derivative [N-{epsilon}(4-nitrobenzofurazan-7-yl)-D-Lys8]-cyclosporin A (NBDL-CSA) into the lumens of isolated rat brain capillaries using confocal microscopy and quantitative image analysis. Luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation was rapidly and reversibly reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by 0.1 to 100 nM endothelin-1 (ET-1). In this concentration range, ET-1 did not affect junctional permeability. The ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin 6c also reduced transport. An ETB receptor antagonist blocked effects of ET-1 and sarafotoxin 6c; an ETA receptor antagonist was without effect. Consistent with this, immunostaining and Western blotting showed expression of the ETB receptor in brain capillary membranes. NBDL-CSA transport was also reduced by sodium nitroprusside, a NO donor, and by phorbol ester, a protein kinase C (PKC) activator. Inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) or PKC abolished the ET-1 effects. Thus, ET-1, acting through an ETB receptor, NOS, and PKC rapidly and reversibly reduced transport mediated by P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier.


The structural basis of the blood-brain barrier is the nonfenestrated, brain capillary endothelium. Functionally, low passive permeability and the expression of selective, plasma membrane-bound transporters define this barrier tissue. These combine to both nourish the central nervous system (CNS) and protect it from potentially toxic chemicals. One critical selective component of the blood-brain barrier is P-glycoprotein, an ATP-driven, drug-efflux pump (Schinkel et al., 1994Go). This multispecific, primary active transporter, located at the luminal membrane of the brain capillary endothelium, is considered to be an important "gatekeeper" of the blood-brain barrier (Schinkel, 1999Go). As such, it protects the CNS from neurotoxicants and also limits brain penetration of a large number of drugs used to treat CNS disorders (Schinkel et al., 1996Go). In this regard, reduced P-glycoprotein function, whether the result of pump inhibition, genetic manipulation, or pathological change, substantially increases brain levels of administered drugs, including chemotherapeutics, human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, and glucocorticoids (Schinkel et al., 1996Go; Fellner et al., 2002Go; Goralski et al., 2003Go).

For CNS therapy, it would clearly be advantageous to be able to modulate P-glycoprotein function over the short term while still retaining its protection over the longer term. One strategy that may accomplish this would be to transiently decrease specific efflux to the blood through rapid regulation. Unfortunately, we know little about the regulation of P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier, and what we do know concerns mechanisms that take from hours to days to work rather than within minutes (Nwaozuzu et al., 2003Go; Demeuse et al., 2004Go; B. Bauer, A. M. S. Hartz, G. Fricker, and D. S. Miller, manuscript in preparation). In other barrier and excretory tissues, regulatory mechanisms have been described that signal rapid changes in P-glycoprotein function. For example, in hepatocytes, endocytic insertion and retrieval of P-glycoprotein from the canalicular membrane occurs in response to cyclic AMP and taurocholate (which cause insertion) and to cholestasis (which causes retrieval) (Kipp and Arias, 2002Go). In addition, in renal proximal tubule, endothelin-1 (ET-1), signaling through an ETB receptor, nitric-oxide synthase (NOS), and protein kinase C (PKC) rapidly reduce transport mediated by P-glycoprotein and the multidrug resistance-associated transporter isoform 2 (Mrp2) (Masereeuw et al., 2000Go; Terlouw et al., 2001Go). The molecular mechanism by which ET signaling reduces transport is unclear (Miller, 2002a).

Here, we provide the first evidence for hormonal signaling causing rapid and reversible changes in blood-brain barrier P-glycoprotein–mediated transport. We found that exposing isolated rat brain capillaries to subnanomolar to nanomolar concentrations of ET-1 rapidly decreased P-glycoprotein–mediated, luminal accumulation of a fluorescent cyclosporin A (NBDL-CSA) derivative. Transport was rapidly restored when ET-1 was removed. As in the renal proximal tubule (above), in brain capillaries, ET-1 signaled through an ETB receptor, NOS, and PKC.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals. Endothelin-1, RES-701-1, JKC-301, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA), and bis-indolyl-maleimide I (BIM) were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). MK571 was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). NBDL-CSA was custom-synthesized by R. Wenger (Basel, Switzerland) (Schramm et al., 1995Go), PSC833 was a kind gift from Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), and 1-O-pentylglycerol was a kind gift from Dr. Bernhard Erdlenbruch (Children's Clinic, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Isolation of Rat Brain Capillaries. Sprague-Dawley rats (male retired breeders; Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) weighing approximately 500 to 750 g were used. Animals were acclimated to the housing facility (1 rat per cage, 12-h light/dark cycle) for at least 5 days and fed NIH-31 rodent diet (Zeigler Brothers, Gardners, PA) and water ad libidum. Animal housing was in accordance with institutional guidelines and the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Use and Care of Laboratory Animals. Isolation of rat brain capillaries was performed as described previously (Miller et al., 2000Go). In brief, rats were killed by CO2 inhalation and decapitated, and brains were taken immediately and kept at 4°C in DPBS buffer (2.7 mM KCl, 1.46 mM KH2PO4, 136.9 mM NaCl, and 8.1 mM Na2HPO4) supplemented with 5 mM D-glucose and 1 mM sodium pyruvate, pH 7.4. Rat brains were dissected and homogenized in the same volume of buffer. After addition of Ficoll (final concentration 15%; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), the homogenate was centrifuged at 5800g for 20 min at 4°C, and the pellet was resuspended in DPBS containing 1% BSA and then passed over a glass-bead column. Capillaries adhering to the glass beads were collected by gentle agitation in DPBS with 1% BSA. Capillaries were washed three times in BSA-free DPBS buffer and then used immediately for experiments.

Transport and Efflux Experiments. Freshly isolated capillaries were transferred to glass coverslips, preincubated for 30 min with the effectors, and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a fluorescent-labeled cyclosporin A derivative (NBDL-CSA). In some experiments, capillaries were first loaded with NBDL-CSA to steady state, and then modulators were added. For each treatment, confocal fluorescence images of 7 to 15 capillaries were acquired, and luminal fluorescence intensity was measured using Scion Image software (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD) as described previously (Miller et al., 2000Go). For efflux experiments, brain capillaries were transferred to glass coverslips and loaded with 2 µM Texas Red (sulforhodamine 101-free acid) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with DPBS, efflux of Texas Red from the lumens of control and treated brain capillaries was followed using confocal microscopy. Confocal images of capillaries were analyzed as described above. First-order efflux rate constants were calculated using nonlinear regression (Prism 4 software; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

Western Blot Analysis. Brain capillaries were homogenized and lysed in mammalian tissue lysis buffer (Sigma) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). After 1 h on ice and occasional vortexing, samples were centrifuged at 10,000g for 30 min. Denucleated supernatants were centrifuged at 100,000g for 90 min. Pellets were resuspended in DPBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail, and protein concentrations were determined. Western blots were performed using the NuPage Bis-Tris electrophoresis system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and were conducted according to the manufacturer's protocol. In brief, protein samples were electrophoresed on 4 to 12% Bis-Tris NuPage gradient gels, subsequently blotted on Invitrolon polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Invitrogen), and blocked with SuperBlock buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 8 h. Then membranes were incubated overnight with a 1:200 dilution (1.5 µg/ml) of polyclonal rabbit anti-ETB primary antibody (Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel). Membranes were washed and incubated for 1 h with anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated ImmunoPure secondary IgG (1:10,000; Pierce). Membranes were again washed and ETB was detected using SuperSignal West Pico Chemoluminescent Substrate (Pierce). Protein bands were visualized with Gel Doc 2000 gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Immunohistochemistry. Freshly isolated rat brain capillaries adhering to glass coverslips were fixed for 15 min with 3% paraformaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde at room temperature. After washing with DPBS, capillaries were permeabilized for 30 min with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in DPBS and subsequently washed with DPBS, now containing 1% BSA for blocking. Then capillaries were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with a 1:100 dilution (3 µg/ml) of polyclonal rabbit anti-ETB antibody (Alomone Labs). After washing (DPBS and 1% BSA), capillaries were incubated with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary IgG (1:1000; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 1 h at 37°C. Negative controls were incubated with secondary antibody only, and nuclei were counterstained with 5 µg/ml propidium iodide for 15 min. Immunostained ETB was visualized using confocal microscopy.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
P-Glycoprotein–Mediated Transport in Isolated Brain Capillaries. We have developed a simple but powerful method to assess P-glycoprotein function in intact brain capillaries. It is derived from measuring the accumulation of a fluorescent cyclosporin A derivative (NBDL-CSA) in capillary lumens using confocal microscopy and image analysis (Miller et al., 2000Go). In previous studies with isolated brain capillaries from rats, pigs and fish, we could demonstrate specific and metabolism-dependent bath-to-lumen transport of a number of P-glycoprotein substrates, including NBDL-CSA (Schramm et al., 1995Go; Fellner et al., 2002Go; Miller et al., 2002Go; Miller, 2003Go). We are now able to maintain isolated rat brain capillaries in a simple physiological saline for up to 8 h without loss of metabolism-driven, concentrative transport (Bauer et al., 2004).

Figure 1A shows a representative rat brain capillary after 60 min in 2 µM NBDL-CSA. Fluorescence intensity is low in the bath, moderate in the endothelium, and highest in the capillary lumen. In this capillary, luminal fluorescence exceeds bath fluorescence by a factor of at least 10. PSC833, a specific inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, blocked luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation (Fig. 1B). In agreement with previous studies (Fellner et al., 2002Go; Bauer et al., 2004), luminal accumulation was also inhibited to the same extent by the metabolic inhibitor NaCN. NBDL-CSA accumulation was not reduced by the Mrp inhibitor leukotriene C4 (data not shown). Note that recent studies indicate that brain capillary endothelial cells express another multispecific, drug efflux pump at the luminal plasma membrane, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) (Cooray et al., 2002Go; Eisenblatter and Galla, 2002Go). Although BCRP and P-glycoprotein have substrates in common, PCS833 is at best a low-affinity inhibitor of BCRP (Chen et al., 2000Go), and it does not affect the blood-to-brain transport of BCRP substrates (Cisternino et al., 2004Go). Although we cannot exclude participation of as yet-unidentified transporters, concentrative, specific, and energy-dependent transport of NBDL-CSA in these brain capillaries seems to be mediated by P-glycoprotein.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. NBDL-CSA transport in isolated rat brain capillaries. A, representative confocal image of a brain capillary after 60-min incubation with 2 µM NBDL-CSA; note the high luminal accumulation of the fluorescent drug derivative. B, capillary after 60-min incubation in medium with 2 µM NBDL-CSA plus 5 µM PSC833. Luminal accumulation is greatly reduced. C, time course of 2 µM NBDL-CSA accumulation in the lumens of isolated rat brain capillaries. Data are shown for control capillaries and those exposed to 5 µM PSC833. D, effect of PSC833 on steady-state luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation. Capillaries were loaded to steady state (60 min) in medium with 2 µM NBDL-CSA. Then (time 0 on graph), 5 µM PSC833 was added to the medium; 45 min later, PSC833 was removed. Each point represents the mean value for 7 to 15 capillaries from a single preparation (pooled tissue from 3–10 rats); variability is given by S.E. bars. Units are arbitrary fluorescence units (scale, 0–255). Scale bars in A and B, 5 µm.

 

Figure 1C shows the time course of 2 µM NBDL-CSA accumulation in the lumens of isolated rat brain capillaries. Control capillaries exhibited an initial increase of luminal NBDL-CSA and reached steady-state levels after approximately 30 min. Exposing capillaries to 5 µM PSC833 decreased luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation significantly. Other experiments (data not shown) demonstrated that this concentration of PSC833 elicited maximal inhibition of transport. Note that roughly 40% of steady-state luminal NBDL-CSA is not affected by PSC833 or NaCN. This component of accumulation probably represents simple diffusion and binding of the cyclosporin A derivative to luminal contents and cell surfaces.

To better define the time course of PSC833 action, capillaries were loaded for 60 min (steady state) with NBDL-CSA, and PSC833 was then added. Upon addition of the transport inhibitor, luminal fluorescence declined rapidly to less than 50% of control levels (Fig. 1D). Removing PSC833 from the medium completely restored luminal fluorescence to control values. Note that luminal fluorescence in control capillaries remained constant over the entire time course of the experiment (nearly 3 h), which is further evidence for extended capillary viability and retained transport function.

Endothelin Effects on Transport. Exposing capillaries to subnanomolar to nanomolar concentrations of ET-1 reduced steady-state luminal NBDL-CSA in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). Maximal ET-1 effects were comparable with those seen with 5 µM PSC833. As with PSC833, adding ET-1 to capillaries incubated to steady state with NBDL-CSA rapidly decreased luminal fluorescence. This effect was entirely reversed when hormone was removed from the medium (Fig. 2B).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effects of ET-1 on NBDL-CSA transport in isolated capillaries. A, concentration-dependent decrease in steady-state luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation caused by ET-1. B, effect of ET-1 on steady-state luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation. Capillaries were loaded to steady state (60 min) in medium with 2 µM NBDL-CSA. Then (time 0 on graph), 100 nM ET-1 was added to the medium; 90 min later, ET-1 was removed. Each point represents the mean value for 7 to 15 capillaries from a single preparation (pooled tissue from 3–10 rats); variability is given by S.E. bars. Units are arbitrary fluorescence units (scale, 0–255). Statistical comparisons: {star}{star}{star}, significantly smaller than control, P < 0.001.

 

The decrease in luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation caused by ET-1 could have resulted from reduced P-glycoprotein function or from opening of tight junctions and leakage of pumped dye out of the lumen. Indeed, mannitol, which is used to osmotically open tight junctions at the blood-brain barrier (Kroll and Neuwelt, 1998Go), rapidly reduced steady-state, luminal NBDL-CSA fluorescence to approximately 50% of control levels, an effect comparable with that seen with PSC833 and ET-1 (Fig. 3A). After removal of mannitol, luminal fluorescence returned to control levels. Thus, mannitol showed the same pattern of effects as ET-1.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. ET-1 actions on transport do not involve increased junctional permeability. A, effect of increased medium osmolality on steady-state luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation. Capillaries were loaded to steady state (60 min) in medium with 2 µM NBDL-CSA. Then (time 0 on graph), 100 mM mannitol was added to the medium; 60 min later, mannitol was removed. B, effect of transport inhibitors ET-1 and SNP on steady-state (60 min) luminal accumulation of Texas Red. Data from two experiments are shown. C, osmotic agents and 1-O-pentylglycerol increase efflux of Texas Red. D, ET-1 does not affect Texas Red efflux. Each point represents the mean value for 7 to 15 capillaries from a single preparation (pooled tissue from 3–10 rats); variability is given by S.E. bars. Units are arbitrary fluorescence units (scale, 0–255). Statistical comparisons: {star}{star}{star}, significantly smaller than control, P < 0.001.

 

To experimentally distinguish between opening of tight junctions and reduced pumping, we developed a kinetic assay derived from the efflux of a preloaded fluorescent test compound from the lumens of capillaries. The compound used was Texas Red (sulforhodamine 101-free acid), a rhodamine-based, fluorescent organic anion. This organic anion is a substrate for the Mrp2, another transporter located in the luminal membrane of the rat brain capillary endothelium (Miller et al., 2000Go). Consistent with this, steady-state luminal accumulation of Texas Red in rat brain capillaries was not affected by the P-glycoprotein inhibitor PSC833 but was reduced by the Mrp2 inhibitor leukotriene C4 (Fig. 3B). Texas Red accumulation was not affected by 100 nM ET-1, a concentration that is 100 times higher than that causing maximal reduction in NBDL-CSA accumulation in capillary lumens, nor by sodium nitroprusside (SNP) concentrations up to 1 µM (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that mediated, concentrative transport of an organic anion into brain capillary lumens was reduced neither by ET-1 nor by NO. They imply that ET-1 does not increase junctional permeability.

To test the latter point directly, capillaries were loaded to steady state with Texas Red and then washed with dye-free medium. Luminal fluorescence was followed for 60 min after washing using the confocal microscope. Figure 3C shows the results of a representative experiment. In control capillaries, loss of dye from the lumen was slow, but significant. Adding the osmotic agents mannitol or sucrose (100 mM) to the medium immediately increased Texas Red efflux from the capillary lumens, as did 1-O-pentylglycerol, a chemical agent that opens the blood-brain barrier by a nonosmotic mechanism (Erdlenbruch et al., 2003Go). In contrast to mannitol, sucrose, and 1-O-pentylglycerol, 100 nM ET-1 did not alter Texas Red efflux (Fig. 3D).

We modeled Texas Red efflux as a first-order exponential and calculated rate constants using nonlinear regression. For 42 control capillaries, the rate constant averaged 0.053 ± 0.004 min-1. The mean rate constant for capillaries exposed to 100 mM mannitol was 0.192 ± 0.009 min-1 (n = 42). Thus, mannitol increased the efflux rate for Texas Red approximately 4-fold (P < 0.01). In parallel experiments, the mean efflux rate constant for capillaries exposed to 100 nM ET-1 was 0.053 ± 0.003 min-1 (n = 21), a value that is not significantly different from that of controls. We take this result to mean that ET-1 reduced luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation by decreasing P-glycoprotein–mediated transport rather than by opening tight junctions.

ET-1 Signaling. Endothelins signal through two receptors: ETA and ETB. Both are known to be expressed in the brain and in the brain vasculature (Kedzierski and Yanagisawa, 2001Go; Levin, 1995Go). We used ET receptor-specific antagonists and an ETB receptor agonist to determine which receptor signaled the decrease in P-glycoprotein–mediated transport in rat brain capillaries. As shown in Fig. 4A, RES-701-1, an ETB antagonist, blocked the action of ET-1. JKC-301, an ETA antagonist, was without effect (Fig. 4B). Consistent with these results, the ETB receptor-specific agonist sarafotoxin 6c significantly reduced in a concentration-dependent manner luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation (Fig. 4C). The decrease in luminal NBDL-CSA fluorescence caused by sarafotoxin 6c was blocked by RES-701-1 (Fig. 4D) but not by JKC-301 (Fig. 4E). Thus, ET-1 acted through an ETB receptor. Consistent with these results, immunostaining localized the ETB receptor to the luminal (apical) as well as abluminal (basolateral) membranes of brain capillaries (Fig. 5A). Western blot analysis confirmed the immunostaining findings, showing a strong band for the ETB receptor in capillary lysates and in capillary membranes (Fig. 5B).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. ET-1 acting through an ETB receptor reduces luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation. A, effect of an ETB receptor antagonist. B, lack of effect of an ETA receptor antagonist. C, the ETB receptor antagonist sarafotoxin 6c reduces luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation. D, sarafotoxin effects are blocked by an ETB receptor antagonist. E, sarafotoxin effects are not blocked by an ETA receptor antagonist. Each point represents the mean value for 7 to 15 capillaries from a single preparation (pooled tissue from 3–10 rats); variability is given by S.E. bars. Units are arbitrary fluorescence units (scale, 0–255). Statistical comparisons: {star}{star}{star}, significantly smaller than control, P < 0.001.

 


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Expression of ETB receptor in rat brain capillaries. A, representative confocal image of capillary immunostained for the ETB receptor (green) and counterstained for nuclei with propidium iodide (red); scale bar, 10 µm. The insert shows at higher magnification ETB receptor immunostaining on the apical and basolateral membrane. Left, ETB receptor immunostaining; right, negative control (top left: red channel with propidium iodide staining of nuclei; top right: green channel; bottom left: transmitted light; bottom right: overlay of green, red, and transmitted light channels). Scale bar, 10 µm. B, Western blot analysis of ETB receptor expression in capillary lysates and isolated capillary membranes.

 

Further experiments implicated activation of NOS and PKC as downstream events in ET-1 signaling. Exposing capillaries to the NO donor SNP caused a concentration-dependent decrease of luminal NBDL-CSA fluorescence (Fig. 6A). With 1 to 100 nM SNP, fluorescence was reduced to approximately 60 to 70% of control levels (P < 0.001). As one might expect, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), an inhibitor of NOS, did not reverse the SNP effect (Fig. 6B). However, blocking NOS with L-NMMA did abolish the effect of ET-1 (Fig. 6C), indicating that activation of NOS and NO generation follows ET-1 binding to its receptor.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Evidence for involvement of NOS in ET-1 signaling. A, concentration-dependence of SNP-induced reduction in steady-state (60 min) luminal accumulation of NBDL-CSA. B, lack of effect of the NOS inhibitor L-NMMA on SNP action. C, blockade of the ET-1–induced decrease in luminal NBDL-CSA fluorescence by L-NMMA. Each point represents the mean value for 7 to 15 capillaries from a single preparation (pooled tissue from 3–10 rats); variability is given by S.E. bars. Units are arbitrary fluorescence units (scale, 0–255). Statistical comparisons: {star}{star}{star}, significantly smaller than control, P < 0.001.

 

PMA, which activates PKC, also reduced luminal NBDL-CSA accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 7A). This effect was abolished by the PKC-selective inhibitor BIM (Fig. 7B). Although PMA can affect targets other than PKC, the low concentration causing significant effects (1 nM) and the protective effect of BIM suggest that PMA reduces NBDL-CSA transport in brain capillaries by acting through PKC. It is noteworthy that BIM also blocked the decrease in luminal NBDL-CSA fluorescence caused by SNP (Fig. 7C) and by ET-1 (Fig. 7D), indicating that PKC signaling followed ET-1 binding and NOS activation. Thus, ET-1, acting through an ETB receptor, activated in turn NOS and PKC, and this chain of events rapidly decreased P-glycoprotein–mediated transport.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Evidence for involvement of PKC in ET-1 signaling. A, concentration-dependence of phorbol ester (PMA)-induced reduction in steady-state (60 min) luminal accumulation of NBDL-CSA. B, blockade of the PMA effect by the PKC-selective inhibitor BIM. C, blockade of the sodium nitroprusside effect by the PKC-selective inhibitor BIM. D, blockade of the ET-1 effect by the PKC-selective inhibitor BIM. Each point represents the mean value for 7 to 15 capillaries from a single preparation (pooled tissue from 3–10 rats); variability is given by S.E. bars. Units are arbitrary fluorescence units (scale, 0–255). Statistical comparisons: {star}{star}, significantly smaller than control, P < 0.01; {star}{star}{star}, significantly smaller than control, P < 0.001.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Because of its wide specificity limits, ability to drive concentrative transport, and placement on the luminal side of the brain capillary endothelium, P-glycoprotein is a critical selective component of the blood-brain barrier. By limiting the penetration of foreign chemicals into the brain, P-glycoprotein protects the CNS. However, because it poorly distinguishes between neurotoxicants and therapeutic drugs, P-glycoprotein is a primary obstacle to treatment of CNS disorders and thus is a potential target for maneuvers designed to increase drug penetration into the brain. In this regard, little is known about the physiological mechanisms that modulate P-glycoprotein function at the blood-brain barrier.

The present experiments are focused on mechanisms that regulate P-glycoprotein transport function over the short term (minutes). Using intact, isolated rat brain capillaries, we found that subnanomolar to nanomolar concentrations of the polypeptide hormone ET-1 rapidly and reversibly decreased P-glycoprotein–mediated transport function. With 1 to 100 nM ET-1, steady-state NBDL-CSA accumulation in capillary lumens was reduced to the same level as was found with 5 µM PSC833, which maximally inhibits P-glycoprotein–mediated transport in the capillaries. Decreased luminal accumulation of NBDL-CSA caused by ET-1 was not accompanied by increased capillary permeability (caused by opening of tight junctions), as measured using a dye efflux assay.

ET-1 release has been shown to occur in many CNS disorders, including cerebral vasospasm/subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, human immunodeficiency virus encephalitis/AIDS dementia complex, multiple sclerosis, and other inflammatory diseases of the brain (Levin, 1995Go; Nie and Olsson, 1996Go; Brooks et al., 1998Go; Narushima et al., 1999Go; Kedzierski and Yanagisawa, 2001Go; Didier et al., 2002Go). The literature contains conflicting reports as to the effects of ET-1 on brain capillary permeability. Thus, injection of ET into the brain has been reported to increase permeability (Narushima et al., 2003Go) or to have no significant effect (Hughes et al., 2003Go). In these in vivo studies, permeability measurements were made after many hours to days of ET-1 treatment. In the present experiments, we only examined ET-1 effects over 1 to 2 h. Thus, it is possible that ET-1 does increase brain capillary permeability over longer time periods than those used here and that decreased P-glycoprotein transport function with no change in capillary permeability is an early effect of ET-1 exposure. Additional experiments will be needed to address this issue.

Note that transport of Texas Red by rat brain capillaries was not affected by 100 nM ET-1, a concentration that was 2 orders of magnitude higher than that which caused maximal reduction in NBDL-CSA transport. We previously showed that Texas Red transport into the lumens of these capillaries is mediated by a member of the Mrp family of transporters, most likely Mrp2 (Miller et al., 2000Go). The present findings indicate that unlike renal proximal tubule (Masereeuw et al., 2000Go), ET-1 signaling does not affect Mrp2 function in brain capillaries.

The present experiments provide an outline of the mechanism by which ET-1 signals a change in P-glycoprotein function. Transport was reduced by ET-1 activation of ETB receptors and subsequent activation of two intracellular enzymes, NOS and PKC. ET-1 actions were mimicked by the ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin 6c; both ET-1 and sarafotoxin 6c effects were blocked by an ETB receptor antagonist but not by an ETA receptor antagonist. ETB receptor was immunolocalized to both the luminal and abluminal surfaces of the capillary endothelium. Thus, in vivo hormone released into the blood or produced in the brain could affect transport. With the present in vitro model, ET-1 exposure was from the brain side of the capillaries.

SNP, which generates NO, also reduced P-glycoprotein–mediated transport, presumably mimicking the effects of NOS activation. Inhibition of PKC blocked the effects of ET-1 and of SNP, whereas inhibition of NOS blocked the effects of ET-1 but not of PKC activation. The minimal signaling pathway that fits the data is linear, going from the ETB receptor to NOS to PKC. This is the same signaling pathway by which ET-1 reduces transport on P-glycoprotein and Mrp2 in renal proximal tubule (Miller et al., 1998Go; Masereeuw et al., 2000Go; Terlouw et al., 2001Go; Miller, 2002Go; Notenboom et al., 2002Go). In proximal tubule, recent studies have implicated guanylyl cyclase, cGMP, and protein kinase G in signaling between NO and PKC (Notenboom et al., 2004Go). There are likely to be additional intermediate signals in brain capillaries that have not yet been identified.

At present it is not clear how PKC modifies P-glycoprotein function. Given the rapid time course of action seen with isolated brain capillaries, three types of mechanism seem possible: 1) PKC directly phosphorylates the transporter, changing turnover number or substrate affinity; 2) PKC phosphorylates an accessory protein that modifies P-glycoprotein activity; and 3) PKC influences P-glycoprotein trafficking, stimulating retrieval from the plasma membrane into a vesicular compartment, as has been demonstrated for P-glycoprotein and other ATP-binding cassette transporters in hepatocytes (Kipp and Arias, 2002Go). At present, we are not able to distinguish among the possibilities.

Finally, we show here for the first time that P-glycoprotein function at the blood-brain barrier can be rapidly reduced and that this reduction in transport function is completely reversible. This finding raises the possibility that activation of signaling could provide a narrow window in time during which normally impermeant drugs that are P-glycoprotein substrates (many chemotherapeutics) would selectively enter the brain and gain access to sites of action within the CNS. Because of vascular effects, it would not be practical to administer ET-1 itself. However, as we learn more about downstream signals that alter P-glycoprotein function in brain capillaries, it may be possible to identify a molecular target that can be pharmacologically manipulated to transiently reduce P-glycoprotein–mediated drug efflux with minimal side effects.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant DFG FR1211/6-2 (to G. F.).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.104.001503.

ABBREVIATIONS: CNS, central nervous system; NBDL-CSA, [N-{epsilon}(4-nitrobenzofurazan-7-yl)-D-Lys8]-cyclosporin A; ET-1, endothelin-1; DPBS, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; NOS, nitric-oxide synthase; PSC833, (3'-oxo-4-butenyl-4-methyl-threonine(1), (valine(2)) cyclosporin; MK571, 3-([{3-(2-[7-chloro-2-quinolinyl]ethenyl)phenyl}-{(3-dimethyl-amino-3-oxopropyl)-thio}-methyl]thio)propanoic acid; L-NMMA, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine; PKC, protein kinase C; Mrp, multidrug resistance-associated transporter; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; BSA, bovine serum albumin; BCRP, breast cancer resistance protein; JKC-301, D-a-aspartyl-L-prolyl-D-isoleucyl-D-tryptophyl.

Address correspondence to: Dr. David S. Miller, Laboratory of Pharmacology and Chemistry, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. E-mail: miller{at}niehs.nih.gov


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Brooks DP, Jorkasky DK, Freed MI, and Ohlstein EH (1998) Pathophysiological role of endothelin and potential therapeutic targets for receptor antagonists, in Endothelin—Molecular Biology, Physiology and Pathology (Highsmith RF ed) pp 223-268, Humana Press, Totowa.

Chen WS, Luker KE, Dahlheimer JL, Pica CM, Luker GD, and Piwnica-Worms D (2000) Effects of MDR1 and MDR3 P-glycoproteins, MRP1 and BCRP/MXR/ABCP on the transport of (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin. Biochem Pharmacol 60: 413-426.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cisternino S, Mercier C, Bourasset F, Roux F, and Scherrmann JM (2004) Expression, up-regulation and transport activity of the multidrug-resistance protein Abcg2 at the mouse blood-brain barrier. Cancer Res 64: 3296-3301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cooray HC, Blackmore CG, Maskell L, and Barrand MA (2002) Localisation of breast cancer resistance protein in microvessel endothelium of human brain. Neuroreport 13: 2059-2063.[CrossRef][Medline]

Demeuse P, Fragner P, Leroy-Noury C, Mercier C, Payen L, Fardel O, Couraud PO, and Roux F (2004) Puromycin selectively increases mdr1a expression in immortalized rat brain endothelial cell lines. J Neurochem 88: 23-31.[Medline]

Didier N, Banks WA, Creminon C, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, and Mabondzo A (2002) HIV-1–induced production of endothelin-1 in an in vitro model of the human blood-brain barrier. Neuroreport 13: 1179-1183.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eisenblatter T and Galla HJ (2002) A new multidrug resistance protein at the blood-brain barrier. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293: 1273-1278.[CrossRef][Medline]

Erdlenbruch B, Alipour M, Fricker G, Miller DS, Kugler W, Eibl H, and Lakomek M (2003) Alkylglycerol opening of the blood-brain barrier to small and large fluorescence markers in normal and C6 glioma-bearing rats and isolated rat brain capillaries. Br J Pharmacol 140: 1201-1210.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fellner S, Bauer B, Miller DS, Schaffrik M, Fankhanel M, Spruss T, Bernhardt G, Graeff C, Farber L, Gschaidmeier H, et al. (2002) Transport of paclitaxel (Taxol) across the blood-brain barrier in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Investig 110: 1309-1318.[CrossRef][Medline]

Goralski KB, Hartmann G, Piquette-Miller M, and Renton KW (2003) Downregulation of mdr1a expression in the brain and liver during CNS inflammation alters the in vivo disposition of digoxin. Br J Pharmacol 139: 35-48.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hughes PM, Anthony DC, Ruddin M, Botham MS, Rankine EL, Sablone M, Baumann D, Mir AK, and Perry VH (2003) Focal lesions in the rat central nervous system induced by endothelin-1. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62: 1276-1286.[Medline]

Kedzierski RM and Yanagisawa M (2001) Endothelin system: the double-edged sword in health and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41: 851-876.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kipp H and Arias IM (2002) Trafficking of canalicular ABC transporters in hepatocytes. Annu Rev Physiol 64: 595-608.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kroll RA and Neuwelt EA (1998) Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means. Neurosurgery 42: 1083-1100.[CrossRef][Medline]

Levin ER (1995) Endothelins. N Engl J Med 333: 356-363.[Free Full Text]

Masereeuw R, Terlouw SA, van Aubel RA, Russel FG, and Miller DS (2000) Endothelin B receptor-mediated regulation of ATP-driven drug secretion in renal proximal tubule. Mol Pharmacol 57: 59-67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller DS (2002) Xenobiotic export pumps, endothelin signaling and tubular nephrotoxicants—a case of molecular hijacking. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 16: 121-127.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miller DS (2003) Confocal imaging of xenobiotic transport across the blood-brain barrier. J Exp Zoolog Part A Comp Exp Biol 300: 84-90.

Miller DS, Graeff C, Droulle L, Fricker S, and Fricker G (2002) Xenobiotic efflux pumps in isolated fish brain capillaries. Am J Physiol 282: R191-R198.

Miller DS, Nobmann SN, Gutmann H, Toeroek M, Drewe J, and Fricker G (2000) Xenobiotic transport across isolated brain microvessels studied by confocal microscopy. Mol Pharmacol 58: 1357-1367.

Miller DS, Sussman CR, and Renfro JL (1998) Protein kinase C regulation of p-glycoprotein-mediated xenobiotic secretion in renal proximal tubule. Am J Physiol 275: F785-F795.

Narushima I, Kita T, Kubo K, Yonetani Y, Momochi C, Yoshikawa I, Shimada K, and Nakashima T (1999) Contribution of endothelin-1 to disruption of blood-brain barrier permeability in dogs. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 360: 639-645.[CrossRef][Medline]

Narushima I, Kita T, Kubo K, Yonetani Y, Momochi C, Yoshikawa I, Ohno N, and Nakashima T (2003) Highly enhanced permeability of blood-brain barrier induced by repeated administration of endothelin-1 in dogs and rats. Pharmacol Toxicol 92: 21-26.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nie XJ and Olsson Y (1996) Endothelin peptides in brain diseases. Rev Neurosci 7: 177-186.[Medline]

Notenboom S, Miller DS, Smits P, Russel FG, and Masereeuw R (2002) Role of NO in endothelin-regulated drug transport in the renal proximal tubule. Am J Physiol 282: F458-F464.

Notenboom S, Miller DS, Smits P, Russel FG, and Masereeuw R (2004) Involvement of guanylyl cyclase and cGMP in the regulation of Mrp2-mediated transport in the proximal tubule. Am J Physiol 287: F33-F38.

Nwaozuzu OM, Sellers LA, and Barrand MA (2003) Signalling pathways influencing basal and H2O2-induced P-glycoprotein expression in endothelial cells derived from the blood-brain barrier. J Neurochem 87: 1043-1051.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schinkel AH (1999) P-glycoprotein, a gatekeeper in the blood-brain barrier. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 36: 179-194.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schinkel AH, Smit JJ, van Tellingen O, Beijnen JH, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, Mol CA, van der Valk MA, Robanus-Maandag EC, te Riele HP, et al. (1994) Disruption of the mouse mdr1a P-glycoprotein gene leads to a deficiency in the blood-brain barrier and to increased sensitivity to drugs. Cell 77: 491-502.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schinkel AH, Wagenaar E, Mol CA, and van Deemter L (1996) P-glycoprotein in the blood-brain barrier of mice influences the brain penetration and pharmacological activity of many drugs. J Clin Investig 97: 2517-2524.[Medline]

Schramm U, Fricker G, Wenger R, and Miller DS (1995) P-glycoprotein-mediated secretion of a fluorescent cyclosporin analogue by teleost renal proximal tubules. Am J Physiol 268: F46-F52.

Terlouw SA, Masereeuw R, Russel FG, and Miller DS (2001) Nephrotoxicants induce endothelin release and signaling in renal proximal tubules: effect on drug efflux. Mol Pharmacol 59: 1433-1440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
A. M. S. Hartz, B. Bauer, M. L. Block, J.-S. Hong, and D. S. Miller
Diesel exhaust particles induce oxidative stress, proinflammatory signaling, and P-glycoprotein up-regulation at the blood-brain barrier
FASEB J, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 2723 - 2733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
D. S. Miller, B. Bauer, and A. M. S. Hartz
Modulation of P-Glycoprotein at the Blood-Brain Barrier: Opportunities to Improve Central Nervous System Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2008; 60(2): 196 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. Bauer, A. M. S. Hartz, A. Pekcec, K. Toellner, D. S. Miller, and H. Potschka
Seizure-Induced Up-Regulation of P-Glycoprotein at the Blood-Brain Barrier through Glutamate and Cyclooxygenase-2 Signaling
Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2008; 73(5): 1444 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. Bauer, A. M. S. Hartz, and D. S. Miller
Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} and Endothelin-1 Increase P-Glycoprotein Expression and Transport Activity at the Blood-Brain Barrier
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 667 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. Sarkadi, L. Homolya, G. Szakacs, and A. Varadi
Human Multidrug Resistance ABCB and ABCG Transporters: Participation in a Chemoimmunity Defense System.
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1179 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
B. Bauer, X. Yang, A. M. S. Hartz, E. R. Olson, R. Zhao, J. C. Kalvass, G. M. Pollack, and D. S. Miller
In Vivo Activation of Human Pregnane X Receptor Tightens the Blood-Brain Barrier to Methadone through P-Glycoprotein Up-Regulation
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1212 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P. T. Ronaldson and R. Bendayan
HIV-1 Viral Envelope Glycoprotein gp120 Triggers an Inflammatory Response in Cultured Rat Astrocytes and Regulates the Functional Expression of P-Glycoprotein
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 1087 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
V. Torbidoni, M. Iribarne, and A. M. Suburo
Endothelin receptors in light-induced retinal degeneration.
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 1095 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. Dallas, D. S. Miller, and R. Bendayan
Multidrug resistance-associated proteins: expression and function in the central nervous system.
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2006; 58(2): 140 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. M. S. Hartz, B. Bauer, G. Fricker, and D. S. Miller
Rapid Modulation of P-Glycoprotein-Mediated Transport at the Blood-Brain Barrier by Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Lipopolysaccharide
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2006; 69(2): 462 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
B. Bauer, A. M. S. Hartz, G. Fricker, and D. S. Miller
Modulation of p-Glycoprotein Transport Function at the Blood-Brain Barrier
Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2005; 230(2): 118 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.001503v1
66/3/387    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartz, A. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartz, A. M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, D. S.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics