MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on July 9, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.002345


0026-895X/04/6604-978-987$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 66:978-987, 2004

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.002345v1
66/4/978    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kellar, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kellar, K. J.

The Nicotinic Receptor in the Rat Pineal Gland Is an {alpha}3{beta}4 Subtype

Susan C. Hernandez, Stefano Vicini, Yingxian Xiao, Martha I. Dávila-García, Robert P. Yasuda, Barry B. Wolfe, and Kenneth J. Kellar

Departments of Pharmacology (S.C.H., Y.X., R.P.Y., B.B.W., K.J.K.) and Physiology & Biophysics (S.V.), Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; and Department of Pharmacology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC (M.I.D.-G.)

Received May 5, 2004; accepted July 8, 2004


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The rat pineal gland contains a high density of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). We characterized the pharmacology of the binding sites and function of these receptors, measured the nAChR subunit mRNA, and used subunit-specific antibodies to establish the receptor subtype as defined by subunit composition. In ligand binding studies, [3H]epibatidine ([3H]EB) binds with an affinity of ~100 pM to nAChRs in the pineal gland, and the density of these sites is ~5 times that in rat cerebral cortex. The affinities of nicotinic drugs for binding sites in the pineal gland are similar to those at {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChRs heterologously expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. In functional studies, the potencies and efficacies of nicotinic drugs to activate or block whole-cell currents in dissociated pinealocytes match closely their potencies and efficacies to activate or block 86Rb+ efflux in the cells expressing heterologous {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChRs. Measurements of mRNA indicated the presence of transcripts for {alpha}3, {beta}2, and {beta}4 nAChR subunits but not those for {alpha}2, {alpha}4, {alpha}5, {alpha}6, {alpha}7, or {beta}3 subunits. Immunoprecipitation with subunit-specific antibodies showed that virtually all [3H]EB-labeled nAChRs contained {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits associated in one complex. The {beta}2 subunit was not associated with this complex. Taken together, these results indicate that virtually all of the nAChRs in the rat pineal gland are the {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChR subtype and that the pineal gland can therefore serve as an excellent and convenient model in which to study the pharmacology and function of these receptors in a native tissue.


Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are ligand-gated cation channels composed of {alpha} and {beta} subunits. Nine {alpha} ({alpha}2–{alpha}10) and three {beta} ({beta}2–{beta}4) subunits have been identified in vertebrates, and different subunit combinations define specific receptor subtypes. All of these subtypes pass Na+, K+, and Ca2+, but they exhibit distinct biophysical and pharmacological properties. Studies of nAChRs in Xenopus laevis oocytes and transfected mammalian cells have provided valuable information on the biophysical properties, pharmacology, and possible regulation of several different well-defined nAChR subtypes that might play important physiological roles. However, the precise subunit compositions of the subtypes of nAChRs that actually exist in most native tissues are not well-defined. Therefore, identifying the subunit composition of native nAChRs is a crucial step in establishing the physiological roles played by the different receptor subtypes that exist in vivo.

Considerable progress has been made in determining the subunit composition of the predominant receptor subtypes in the rat forebrain, namely the {alpha}4{beta}2 subtype (Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987Go; Flores et al., 1992Go), which has high affinity for most agonists, and the {alpha}7 subtype, which has high affinity for {alpha}-bungarotoxin ({alpha}-BTX) (Couturier et al., 1990Go; Schoepfer et al., 1990Go; Orr-Urtreger et al., 1997Go). However, other nAChR subtypes are found in various amounts throughout many regions of the central nervous system (Marks et al., 1998Go; Perry et al., 2002Go), and some of these less prevalent receptors may play critical roles because of their strategic location (e.g., {alpha}6-containing receptors on dopamine axons) (Quik et al., 2002Go; Champtiaux et al., 2003Go; Salminen et al., 2004Go). Moreover, under some conditions in vivo, such as when {alpha}4{beta}2 and/or {alpha}7 receptors are desensitized or inactivated by exposure to nicotine or during certain disease states that may involve the loss of specific nAChR subtypes, the less prevalent receptors may take on critical roles in mediating cholinergic signals. In addition, {alpha}3{beta}2 and {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChR subtypes are the predominant nAChRs in autonomic ganglia and thus are critical to the homeostatic functioning of virtually all organ systems in the body.

The pineal gland is part of the photoneuroendocrine system of vertebrates and functions in response to signals from photoreceptor cells in the retina and endogenous oscillators within the suprachiasmatic nucleus to translate light stimuli into neuroendocrine responses. The main role of the pineal gland seems to be to produce and secrete the hormone melatonin, which influences circadian and seasonal biological rhythms in animals. Melatonin production is stimulated when norepinephrine released by sympathetic axons from the superior cervical ganglia activate {beta}-adrenergic receptors in the pineal gland (Axelrod, 1974Go). More recent studies have demonstrated a cholinergic innervation of the pineal gland from the parasympathetic nervous system (Korf et al., 1996Go; Larsen et al., 1998Go; Schafer et al., 1998Go) and possibly from the medial habenula within the brain (Schafer et al., 1998Go). This cholinergic innervation seems to play an important role in pineal gland physiology by inhibiting melatonin synthesis via the activation of nAChRs (Stankov et al., 1993Go; Yamada et al., 1998aGo).

The pineal expresses mRNA encoding the {alpha}3, {beta}2, and {beta}4 nAChR subunits (Wada et al., 1989Go; Zoli et al., 1995Go), and nAChR binding sites have been found in mouse and rat pineal gland (Marks et al., 1998Go; Hernandez et al., 1999Go; Perry et al., 2002Go; Dávila-García et al., 2003Go). Here, we studied the pharmacology of the rat pineal nAChR binding sites and functional responses and used subunit-selective antibodies to determine the subunit composition of the nAChR subtype expressed in the rat pineal gland. Our data indicate that the pineal gland expresses a single subtype of nAChR; it thus provides a simple and convenient model system in which to study a native nAChR of defined subtype.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials. [3H]Epibatidine ([3H]EB) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA). 125I-Epibatidine (125I-EB) used for autoradiography was a kind gift from Dr. John Musachio (National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD). 125I-{alpha}-Bungarotoxin (125I-{alpha}-BTX) and [{alpha}-32P]ATP were purchased from Amersham Biosciences Inc. (Piscataway, NJ). Tissue culture medium, fetal bovine serum, and antibiotics were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). DNase1 was purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN). Bacterial cell walls containing protein-A (Pansorbin) and protein G (Omnisorb) were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Whatman GF/C filters were obtained from Brandell (Gaithersburg, MD). Other drugs and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific Co. (Fairlawn, NJ). The {alpha}3 nAChR subunit-specific polyclonal antibody was raised in rabbits and has been described previously (Yeh et al., 2001Go). The {beta}4 nAChR subunit specific polyclonal antibody was a generous gift from Dr. Scott Rogers (University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT). The {beta}2 nAChR subunit-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) 270 was produced from hybridoma stocks purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). This mAb was originally developed and characterized by Whiting and Lindstrom (1987Go). It is an excellent antibody for immunoprecipitation, but it does not detect rat nAChR {beta}2 subunits in Western blots. Therefore, an nAChR {beta}2 subunit-specific polyclonal antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA) and used for Western blotting analysis.

Tissues. Frozen pineal glands and cerebral cortex from male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 225 to 250 g were purchased from Zivic-Miller Laboratories (Portersville, PA) and stored at -80°C until assayed.

Primary Cell Culture. Male Sprague-Dawley rats purchased from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY) were group-housed with food and water ad libitum in a temperature- and light-controlled room (24°C, lights on from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM). At 30 to 35 days old (weighing 150 to 200 g), the rats were anesthetized with methoxyflurane inhalation and decapitated. Fresh pineal glands were dissected and then used for primary tissue culture. The isolated pineal glands were washed two times in phosphate-buffered saline and cut into small pieces under a dissecting microscope. The tissue pieces were transferred to a sterile tube containing 5 ml of 0.02% trypsin and 1% DNase in phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with gentle shaking for 10 min at 37°C. The tissues were triturated with a fire-polished pasture pipette and incubated for another 10 min at 37°C. The tissues were then triturated a second time, and 0.5 ml of fetal bovine serum was added to stop the enzymatic reaction. The dissociated cells were washed four times by centrifugation at 800g in culture media containing basal Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 25 mM glutamine, and 50 µg/ml gentamycin. The dissociated pineal cells were resuspended in fresh culture media and plated onto poly-D-lysine coated coverslips in a 30-mm dish. Cultures were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator for 1 to 3 days. HEK 293 cells stably expressing the {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChR (KX{alpha}3{beta}4 cells) and {alpha}3{beta}2 nAChR (KX{alpha}3{beta}2 cells) were grown and maintained as described previously (Xiao et al., 1998Go).

Radioligand Binding Assays. nAChR receptor binding sites in membrane homogenates from rat pineal gland and HEK cells expressing {alpha}3{beta}4 and {alpha}3{beta}2 nAChRs were measured with [3H]EB. Tissues were homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and the homogenates were centrifuged at 35,000g for 10 min. Membrane pellets were washed twice and then resuspended in fresh buffer. Membrane aliquots (~35 µg of protein) were incubated with [3H]EB (~5–3000 pM) for 4 h at 24°C in a volume of 1 ml of Tris-HCl buffer. In competition binding experiments, a series of concentrations of each drug was incubated with ~500 pM [3H]EB. Bound and free radioligand were separated by vacuum filtration through Whatman GF/C filters pretreated with 0.5% polyethylenimine. The radioactivity bound to the filter was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 300 µM (-)-nicotine, and specific binding was defined as the difference between total and nonspecific binding. In saturation binding experiments, Bmax and Kd values were determined by nonlinear regression analysis (Prism software; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). In competition binding experiments, inhibition curves and the IC50 values were determined by nonlinear regression analysis (GraphPad Prism). The affinities of drugs (Ki values) at nAChRs were calculated from the IC50 values using the Cheng-Prusoff equation (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973Go).

Autoradiography. Autoradiography of 125I-EB and 125I-{alpha}-BTX binding sites was carried out in 20-µm cryostat-cut sections of the rat brain through the superior colliculus with the pineal gland in place, as described by Perry et al. (2002Go). Adjacent brain sections were mounted onto slides and incubated with ~500 pM 125I-EB or ~5 nM 125I-{alpha}-BTX and then rinsed, air-dried, and apposed to autoradiographic film for 1 to 6 days. Nonspecific labeling was determined in the presence of 300 µM nicotine.

Immunoprecipitation. Rat pineal glands were prepared as for a radioligand binding assay, and the membrane pellet was resuspended in fresh buffer and incubated with ~3 nM [3H]EB for 2 h at room temperature. The tissue was then solubilized by the addition of Triton X-100 at a final concentration of 2% with gentle mixing for 2 h at room temperature. After solubilization, the mixture was centrifuged at 35,000g for 30 min. Aliquots of clear supernatant equivalent to 4 mg of original tissue weight were added to tubes containing either crude antiserum directed at the {beta}4 subunit, affinity-purified antibody directed at the {alpha}3 subunit, or an mAb directed at the {beta}2 subunit. The {beta}4 antiserum was tested at dilutions from 1:50 to 1:6 to determine the optimal concentration. The stock {alpha}3 and {beta}2 antibodies each contained 1 µg/µl and were tested at dilutions from 2:100 to 15:100 to determine the optimal concentration. Tubes containing normal rabbit serum or an irrelevant monoclonal antibody served as controls. The mixtures were incubated for 4 to 16 h at 4°C with gentle rotation. After this incubation period, 50-µl aliquots of stripped Protein A (Pansorbin) or Protein G (Omnisorb) (Wall et al., 1991Go) were added to each assay tube and incubated for an additional hour at 4°C with gentle rotation. The [3H]EB-labeled receptor-antibody complex was precipitated by centrifugation at 14,000g for 30 s. The pellets were washed two times with 1 ml of Tris/EDTA buffer, dissolved in 400 µl of 0.1 NaOH and 3% deoxycholate, and counted by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. For the sequential immunoprecipitation assays, the individual clear supernatant from the first immunoprecipitation was collected and immediately added to tubes containing antisera or antibody directed at another nAChR subunit and allowed to incubate for an additional 4 h. The immunoprecipitation procedure with the second antibody was carried out as described above.

Western Blots. Western blot analyses to measure subunit proteins were carried out as described previously (Yeh et al., 2001Go) using the polyclonal antibodies directed at each of the subunits.

RNA Isolation and RNase Protection Assay. Expressions of mRNAs encoding nAChR subunits were determined as described previously (Xiao et al., 1998Go) with modifications. In brief, total cellular RNA was isolated using RNA-STAT-60 (Tel-Test Inc., Friendswood, TX). Antisense riboprobes for the {alpha}2, {alpha}3, {alpha}4, {alpha}5, {alpha}6, {alpha}7, {beta}2, {beta}3, and {beta}4 nAChR subunits were generated from DNA templates using T7 RNA polymerase and [{alpha}-32P]CTP. The RNase protection assays were carried out using the RPA II kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Total RNA (20 µg) from the tissue samples was hybridized overnight at 42°C with the subunit riboprobes and a riboprobe for rat GAPDH, which was used as an internal and loading control. Specific activities of [{alpha}-32P]CTP used for synthesizing the probes of rat nAChR subunit genes and the probe of GAPDH were 800 and 40 Ci/mmol, respectively. After hybridization, nonprotected fragments were digested with a combination of RNase A and RNase T1 for 30 min at 37°C. The numbers of bases of the full-length probes and the protected fragments of the probes were as follows: {alpha}2, 416 and 332; {alpha}3, 306 and 230; {alpha}4, 496 and 408; {alpha}5, 411 and 380; {alpha}6, 462 and 396; {alpha}7, 450 and 376; {beta}2, 322 and 263; {beta}3, 430 and 394; {beta}4, 252 and 170; and GAPDH, 204 and 135. To avoid overlap of signal bands, three reactions were carried out for each RNA sample separately using three groups of probes: group 1 contained {alpha}2, {alpha}3, {alpha}4, and GAPDH; group 2 contained {alpha}5, {alpha}6, {beta}4, and GAPDH; and group 3 contained {alpha}7, {beta}2, {beta}3, and GAPDH. The protected probe fragments were separated by electrophoresis on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and the fragments were visualized using X-ray film or by filmless autoradiographic analysis (PhosphorImager, 445 SI, Amersham Biosciences).

Electrophysiology. Functional responses of nAChRs in rat pineal primary cell culture were measured using the whole-cell configuration of the voltage patch clamp technique. Dissociated rat pinealocytes were plated onto glass cover slips and positioned into a recording chamber (1 ml volume) mounted on the stage of an upright microscope (Axioskop; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) used to visually identify the cells under study. The cells were bathed with an extracellular solution containing 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM glucose, and 5 mM HEPES and adjusted to 325 mOsM with sucrose, pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. The recording chamber was continuously perfused with the extracellular solution at a rate of 1 ml/min. Ionic currents were monitored with an Axopatch 1-D patch amplifier (Axon Instruments Inc., Union City, CA). Recording patch electrodes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries to a resistance of 5 to 7 M{Omega} when filled with internal electrode solution containing 145 mM potassium gluconate, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM ATP 0.5 mM GTP, and 10 mM BAPTA, pH adjusted to 7.42 with CsOH. Pinealocytes were distinguished from glial cells visually and selected for whole-cell recording. The size and capacitance were very similar between pinealocytes, and recordings were made from single isolated cells. No differences in responses between cells kept in culture for 1 or 3 days were noted. Drugs were applied using a gravity-fed Y-shaped tubing system positioned within 500 µm of the cell under investigation. Drugs were applied and exchanged rapidly with an onset of <100 ms. For experiments requiring {alpha}-BTX incubation, the extracellular solution was exchanged with the same solution with the addition of toxin and allowed to incubate for 2.5 min. Generation of voltage-clamp protocols and acquisition of data were carried out using the pCLAMP software. All experiments were performed at room temperature.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expressions of nAChR Subunit mRNAs in Rat Pineal Glands. Expressions of mRNAs encoding nine nAChR subunits ({alpha}2, {alpha}3, {alpha}4, {alpha}5, {alpha}6, {alpha}7, {beta}2, {beta}3, and {beta}4) in rat pineal glands were examined with a multiplex RNase protection assay. The mRNA expression pattern detected in the rat pineal gland is shown in Fig. 1. The pineal gland expressed nAChR mRNAs encoding the {alpha}3 (lane 1), {beta}4 (lane 2), and {beta}2 (lane 3) subunits only, and the intensity of the bands indicated that the expression levels of the {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunit mRNAs were somewhat higher than that of the {beta}2 subunit mRNA. Although no signals for the mRNA encoding any other nAChR subunits were detected in the pineal gland, strong signals for these other subunits were detected in tissues used as positive controls for the assay (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Expression of nAChR subunit mRNA in the rat pineal gland. Rnase protection assays were carried out as described under Materials and Methods. Total RNA from rat pineal gland was hybridized with a combination of 32P-labeled antisense probes corresponding to the nine rat nAChR subunit genes {alpha}2, {alpha}3, and {alpha}4 (lane 1); {alpha}5, {alpha}6, and {beta}4 (lane 2); and {alpha}7, {beta}2, and {beta}3 (lane 3). The probe corresponding to the GAPDH gene was used as an internal and loading control. The gel shown is representative of three to six independent experiments for the different subunits.

 

nAChR Binding Sites in the Rat Pineal Gland. Autoradiographic studies of nAChR binding sites in coronal brain sections at the level of the superior colliculus revealed dense 125I-EB binding sites in the pineal gland (Fig. 2A); in contrast, autoradiography of 125I-{alpha}-BTX binding in the pineal did not exceed the background level (Fig. 2B). These autoradiographic results combined with the mRNA analysis indicate that the pineal gland expresses one or more heteromeric nAChRs but not {alpha}7 receptors or other subtypes that bind 125I-{alpha}-BTX. As shown in Fig. 3, saturation binding measurements of [3H]EB binding sites in membrane homogenates demonstrate that the pineal gland expresses a high density of nAChRs (~300 fmol/mg of protein) that is approximately five times the density found in the rat forebrain (~60 fmol/mg of protein). The [3H]EB binding curves in the pineal fit a model for a single site, with a Kd of ~100 pM.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Autoradiographic images of 125I-EB and 125I-{alpha}-BTX binding to rat pineal gland. Autoradiography was carried out as described under Materials and Methods. Coronal sections (20 µm) of brain at the level of the superior colliculus with the pineal gland intact were mounted onto slides and incubated with 500 pM 125I-EB (A) or 5 nM 125I-{alpha}-BTX (B) to measure total binding (TB) to the sections. Nonspecific binding (NSB) was measured in parallel by incubating adjacent brain sections with the radioligands in the presence of 300 µM nicotine. Slides were washed, dried, and apposed to autoradiographic X-ray film in cassettes for two to six days. CTX, cerebral cortex; SC, superior colliculus; Pin, pineal.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Saturation Binding of [3H]EB to membrane homogenates from rat pineal gland. Binding curves represent specific binding ({blacksquare}) and nonspecific binding ({square}) of [3H]EB to membrane homogenates from rat pineal gland. Inset, a comparison of the Bmax value for [3H]EB-specific binding to membrane homogenates from rat pineal gland versus the rat cerebral cortex to demonstrate the relative densities of nAChRs expressed in the two tissues. Saturation data were analyzed by a nonlinear regression program (GraphPad). Data shown are representative of six pineal gland and three cortex independent saturation experiments. The Kd and Bmax values for the pineal gland were 103 ± 15 pM and 321 ± 37 fmol/mg of protein, respectively.

 

From the nAChR subunit mRNA it expresses, the pineal could contain either an {alpha}3{beta}2 or an {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype, both subtypes, or a receptor composed of {alpha}3 subunits in association with both {beta}2 and {beta}4 subunits (i.e., an {alpha}3{beta}2{beta}4 subtype). To begin to determine the characteristics of the nAChR subtype(s) in the pineal gland, the affinities of drugs for the [3H]EB-labeled sites were assessed in binding competition assays and compared with the affinities at defined {alpha}3{beta}4 and {alpha}3{beta}2 receptors heterologously expressed in HEK 293 cells. The agonists A-85380, cytisine, and nicotine all competed for [3H]EB binding sites in the pineal gland with affinities between ~24 and 200 nM, whereas the antagonist dihydro-{beta}-erythroidine (DH{beta}E) displayed an affinity of ~65 µM (Fig. 4A and Table 1). These affinities are much closer to those found at the defined {alpha}3{beta}4 receptor than at the {alpha}3{beta}2 receptor, especially for A-85380 and DH{beta}E, two drugs that are good discriminators between these subtypes (Fig. 4, B and C; Table 1). In fact, the correlation line between the Ki values for the pineal and the {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype was very close to the line of identity (Fig. 4D), suggesting that, as is seen in Table 1, the pharmacology of the pineal nAChR binding sites is very similar to, and probably indistinguishable from, that of the {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Comparison between ligand binding competition profiles of nAChRs in membrane homogenates from rat pineal gland and HEK 293 cells expressing {alpha}3{beta}4 or {alpha}3{beta}2 nAChRs. Competition of nicotinic drugs for [3H]EB binding sites in rat pineal gland (A), {alpha}3{beta}4 cells (B), and {alpha}3{beta}2 cells (C). The membrane homogenates were incubated with 500 pM [3H]EB, and the competing ligands were added at the concentrations indicated. All curves fit a one-site binding model, and the Ki values are provided in Table 1. Data shown are representative of three to six independent experiments. D, correlation between Ki values for nAChRs in the pineal gland and the {alpha}3{beta}4 and {alpha}3{beta}2 nAChRs in transfected cells. The logs of the Ki values in Table 1 were fit to a linear regression equation, and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was determined for each regression line. The broken line represents the line of identity for the data and indicates that the pineal gland Ki values corresponded most closely to the {alpha}3{beta}4 transfected cells. Data shown are the mean values of three to six independent experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Comparison of Ki values of nAChR ligand binding in membrane homogenates from rat pineal gland, {alpha}3{beta}4 cells, and {alpha}3{beta}2 cells Competition binding assays were carried out as described under Materials and Methods using ~500 pM [3H]EB. The Ki values were calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff equation. Values shown are the mean ± S.E.M. of three to six independent experiments.

 

Functional Responses of nAChRs in the Pineal Gland. The functional responses of the nAChRs in the pineal were examined in whole-cell patch-clamp studies of dissociated pineal cells maintained in culture for ~3 days. All nicotinic agonists examined activated inward currents in a concentration-dependent manner, with epibatidine being at least 100 times more potent than any other agonist tested and ~1000 times more potent than acetylcholine (Fig. 5, A and B; Table 2). Most of the agonists examined here, including cytisine, functioned as full agonists compared with acetylcholine, eliciting peak currents of 250 to 300 pA; the exception was DMPP, which seemed to be a partial agonist with approximately half the efficacy of acetylcholine (Fig. 5C). The receptors seemed to desensitize in a manner that was also concentration-dependent, but they recovered their sensitivity within approximately 2 min after removal of agonists (data not shown). At agonist concentrations ≥500 µM, there was usually an obvious loss of receptor function, which probably reflects channel blockade by most of the agonists (data not shown). That could account for the apparently slightly higher efficacy seen with epibatidine, which, because of its high potency, can fully activate the receptors at concentrations that do not significantly block the channel.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Concentration response of different nicotinic agonists at nAChRs in dissociated rat pinealocytes. A, sample traces of currents activated by EB, A-85380, nicotine (Nic), cytisine (Cyt), acetylcholine (ACh), and DMPP. Currents were recorded at a constant holding potential of -60 mV. Traces shown are representative of independent recordings from six different pinealocytes at the indicated drug concentrations. B, concentration-response curves for currents activated by increasing concentrations of EB ({circ}), A-85380 ({blacksquare}), NIC ({diamondsuit}), Cyt ({blacktriangleup}), ACh ({diamond}), and DMPP ({star}). Increasing concentrations of each agonist were applied at two mini-intervals with washout between each application. Currents were normalized to the maximal response induced by each individual agonist, and data were fit to a sigmoidal concentration-response relationship using GraphPad. C, peak currents activated by each drug. Data are the mean ± S.E.M. for five to seven independent experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Comparison of EC50 values of nicotinic agonists for activation of currents through nAChRs in rat pineal cells and stimulation of 86Rb+ efflux from {alpha}3{beta}4-transfected cells Dissociated pineal cells were prepared from ~30-day-old male Sprague-Dawley rats as described under Materials and Methods. See Fig. 5 for description of data analyses and curve-fittings of pineal whole-cell recordings. Values shown are the mean ± S.E.M. from five to seven different cell recordings and at least three 86Rb+ efflux assays.

 

As shown in Table 2, the EC50 values for these six agonists to activate whole-cell currents via nAChRs in the pineal gland are very similar to their EC50 values to stimulate 86Rb+ efflux via defined {alpha}3{beta}4 receptors heterologously expressed in HEK 293 cells. In fact, as shown in Fig. 6, comparison of the EC50 values for these two very different functional assays carried out in different cell types, one expressing its native receptor and the other expressing a heterologous receptor, reveals that the values are highly correlated (r = 0.99); and, more important, the best fit line for the correlation is again close to the line of identity, indicating that the absolute EC50 values are very similar, as would be expected if both assays were measuring the same receptor.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Correlation between EC50 values for agonist-stimulated whole-cell currents in pineal cells and agonist-stimulated 86Rb+ efflux in transfected cells expressing {alpha}3{beta}4 receptors. The logs of the Ki values in Table 2 were fit to a linear regression equation, and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was determined. The broken line represents the line of identity and indicates a close correspondence between the EC50 values derived from the two different types of assays.

 

The potencies of antagonists to block nicotine-activated currents were evaluated by first measuring activation by 30 µM nicotine alone followed at 2-min intervals by measurements after simultaneous application of 30 µM nicotine and decreasing concentrations of mecamylamine, curare, or DH{beta}E in the same cell. Each of these antagonists blocked nicotine-activated currents (Fig. 7A), and the block was concentration-dependent (Fig. 7B). In contrast, {alpha}-BTX, which is a highly selective {alpha}7 nAChR antagonist, failed to block the nicotine-induced currents in the pineal cells even when the cells were perfused with the toxin during and for 2.5 min before application of nicotine (Fig. 7A).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Concentration-dependent inhibition of nicotine-activated whole-cell currents by nicotinic antagonists in dissociated rat pinealocytes. A, sample traces of currents activated by 30 µM nicotine in rat pinealocytes in the absence and presence of mecamylamine (Mec), curare, DH{beta}E, and {alpha}-BTX. The cells first received an initial control application of 30 µM nicotine followed by simultaneous application of 30 µM nicotine plus the indicated concentration of antagonist, except for {alpha}-BTX, which was present 2.5 min before and during the second nicotine application. B, concentration-response inhibition curves for Mec ({circ}), curare ({square}), and DH{beta}E ({blacktriangledown}). Before curve-fitting, the peak currents were normalized to the maximal current induced by 30 µM nicotine and expressed as a percentage of control. Data were fit to a sigmoidal concentration-response relationship using GraphPad. Data shown are mean ± S.E.M. of three to five independent experiments.

 

As shown in Table 3, the IC50 values for the three antagonists to block nicotine-activated whole-cell currents in the pineal are similar to their IC50 values to block 86Rb+ efflux via defined {alpha}3{beta}4 receptors heterologously expressed in HEK 293 cells. Moreover, for DH{beta}E, the only effective competitive antagonist examined here, its Ki value calculated from its IC50 to inhibit whole-cell currents in pineal cells was indistinguishable from its Ki value calculated from its IC50 to inhibit 86Rb+ efflux in the heterologously expressed cells (20 versus 22 µM).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3 Comparison of IC50 values of nicotinic antagonists for inhibition of nicotine (30 mM)-activated currents through nAChRs in rat pineal cells and inhibition of nicotine (100 mM)-stimulated 86Rb+ efflux from {alpha}3{beta}4 cells Dissociated pineal cells were prepared from ~30-day-old male Sprague-Dawley rats as described under Materials and Methods. See Fig. 5 for description of data analyses and curve-fittings of pineal whole-cell recordings. Values shown are the mean ± S.E.M. from four to five whole-cell recordings and at least three 86Rb+ efflux assays.

 

Subunit Composition of nAChRs in Pineal Gland. The pharmacological characteristics of the nAChRs in the pineal gland are consistent with an {alpha}3{beta}4 receptor subtype, but pharmacology cannot prove subtype, which is defined by subunit composition. Therefore, we carried out immunoprecipitation assays to identify the subunits that comprise the pineal nAChRs. To do this, we used a polyclonal antibody selective for the {alpha}3 subunit (Yeh et al., 2001Go), another directed at the {beta}4 subunit (Flores et al., 1996Go), and the monoclonal antibody mAb 270, which is selective for the {beta}2 subunit (Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987Go). As shown in Fig. 8, the polyclonal antibodies directed at the {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits each immunoprecipitated [3H]EB-labeled nAChRs from detergent-solubilized extracts of pineal tissue in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, the {beta}2 subunit-selective mAb 270 did not immunoprecipitate any [3H]EB-labeled receptors from the pineal extracts (Fig. 8). To confirm that mAb 270 was, in fact, capable of immunoprecipitating nAChRs that contained {beta}2 subunits, it was tested in similarly prepared extracts from rat cerebral cortex, where it effectively immunoprecipitated the {alpha}4{beta}2 receptor (Fig. 8, inset), which predominates in that tissue (Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987Go; Flores et al., 1992Go).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Concentration-dependence of antibodies for immunoprecipitation of solubilized nAChRs from the rat pineal gland. Pineal gland membrane homogenates were solubilized, and [3H]EB-labeled nAChRs equivalent to 4 mg of rat pineal gland tissue was incubated with the indicated dilutions of anti-{beta}4 antiserum ({blacksquare}), anti-{alpha}3 antibody ({blacktriangleup}), or anti-{beta}2 monoclonal antibody ({circ}) (mAb 270), and specific immunoprecipitation was measured as described under Materials and Methods. As shown, only the anti-{alpha}3 antibody and anti-{beta}4 antiserum immunoprecipitated [3H]EB-labeled nAChRs from the pineal gland. Inset, in rat cerebral cortex, in contrast to the pineal gland, the anti-{beta}2 monoclonal antibody immunoprecipitated [3H]EB-labeled nAChRs. Data shown are mean ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments.

 

The immunoprecipitation of nAChRs in the pineal extracts only with antibodies directed at {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits indicates that these two subunits probably comprise the nAChR in the pineal gland. To further test this, sequential immunoprecipitation assays were carried out to determine whether the {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits are physically associated with each other in the pineal gland. In these studies, [3H]EB-labeled nAChRs in pineal membranes were solubilized and immunoprecipitated with one subunit-specific antibody, and then, after centrifugation, to collect the immunoprecipitated receptors in the pellet, the remaining ("cleared") supernatant was subjected to a second immunoprecipitation with a second subunit-specific antibody. The degree to which the first antibody decreases immunoprecipitation by the second antibody indicates the degree of association between the subunits (Flores et al., 1992Go).

The results from these sequential immunoprecipitation studies are shown in Fig. 9. When the pineal extracts were first immunoprecipitated with the {alpha}3 subunit-specific antibody, subsequent immunoprecipitations of the supernatant with the antibodies directed at the {alpha}3, {beta}4, or {beta}2 subunits yielded essentially no additional immunoprecipitation (Fig. 9A). Nearly identical results were found when the extracts were first immunoprecipitated with the {beta}4 subunit-specific antisera (Fig. 9B). In contrast, the {beta}2 subunit-specific mAb 270 antibody did not immunoprecipitate significant amounts of [3H]EB-labeled receptors from the pineal extracts; thus, after a first exposure to mAb 270, subsequent exposure to the antibodies directed at either the {alpha}3 or {beta}4 antisera subunits immunoprecipitated virtually all of the receptors available in the supernatant (Fig. 9C). Western blot analyses of pineal extracts clearly demonstrated the presence of the {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits, but no signal was detected for the {beta}2 subunit (data not shown).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Association of {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits in the rat pineal gland nAChR. Sequential immunoprecipitations were performed as described under Materials and Methods. Aliquots of solubilized, [3H]EB-labeled nAChRs from rat pineal gland were incubated sequentially with anti-{alpha}3 antibody, anti-{beta}4 antiserum, or anti-{beta}2 monoclonal antibody (mAb 270). Initial immunoprecipitation with {alpha}3 antibody (A), {beta}4 antiserum (B), or {beta}2 monoclonal antibody (C) was followed in each case by a second immunoprecipitation with {alpha}3 antibody, {beta}4 antiserum, or the {beta}2 monoclonal antibody. Results are expressed as the percentage of specific immunoprecipitation of total solubilized receptors. Data are the mean ± S.E.M. from three independent experiments.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
nAChRs mediate the actions of acetylcholine, nicotine, and other nicotinic agonists throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. Multiple subtypes of these receptors may form from the eight {alpha} and three {beta} subunits known to be expressed in mammalian tissues, but because the rules of assembly are not known, the number of theoretically possible heteromeric nAChR subtypes is not yet established. More important, there are very few tissues in which the subunit composition of native nAChRs is known with some certainty. The {alpha}7 subtype is identifiable in brain by its rapid kinetics and especially by its sensitivity to {alpha}-BTX. In contrast, the many different potential subtypes of heteromeric receptors are not so readily distinguished. The predominant heteromeric nAChR in mammalian brain is the {alpha}4{beta}2 subtype (Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987Go; Flores et al., 1992Go); however, other subtypes also are found in many areas of brain and spinal cord (Marks et al., 1998Go; Perry et al., 2002Go), usually making it difficult to know whether a nicotinic response is mediated by a single nAChR subtype or is a composite response reflecting more than one receptor. Peripheral ganglia seem to contain both {alpha}3{beta}2 and {alpha}3{beta}4 receptors, possibly incorporating an {alpha}5 subunit in some cases (Conroy and Berg, 1995Go; Flores et al., 1996Go; Xu et al., 1999Go); so again, even with their more limited number of nAChR subunits, it is usually not readily apparent which subtype mediates a particular response.

The main finding of this study is that the rat pineal gland expresses the {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype of nAChR apparently exclusively. The evidence for this is based on the pharmacology of the receptor and on direct studies of its subunit composition. The pharmacology of both the receptor's binding site and its function correspond quantitatively (Ki and EC50 values) to the defined {alpha}3{beta}4 receptor heterologously expressed in HEK 293 cells. Moreover, definitive evidence for the subunit composition of the receptor was derived from the immunoprecipitation studies with subunit-specific antibodies, which indicate clearly that the {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits in the pineal gland are associated exclusively with each other in the same [3H]EB binding complex. This conclusion is consistent with data from autoradiography studies using 125I-EB in conjunction with drugs that mask certain receptor subtypes (Perry et al., 2002Go). The pineal gland thus serves as one of the few tissues available for studies of a defined subtype of native heteromeric nAChR.

We measured strong signals for {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunit mRNA, as well as a somewhat weaker mRNA signal for the {beta}2 subunit in the rat pineal gland. These results are consistent with previous mRNA analyses of nicotinic receptor subunits in the rat pineal gland (Wada et al., 1989Go; Zoli et al., 1995Go). However, we found no evidence that rat pineal gland nAChRs incorporate {beta}2 subunits; in fact, we found no evidence for the presence of the {beta}2 protein via Western blots. From the sensitivity of our binding and immunoprecipitation assays, we estimate we could have detected {beta}2-containing receptors if they constituted ~5% or more of the pineal receptors. The presence of the {beta}2 mRNA might reflect a transient nAChR present during an earlier developmental stage or even a role in another protein expressed at low levels.

The main function of the pineal gland is the coupling of central circadian timing systems to effectors by the rhythmic production and release of melatonin. Therefore, pineal function and melatonin have been implicated in reproductive cycles, gonad size (in some species), and sleep-wake cycles (including jet lag). The pineal gland seems to be innervated by both limbs of the autonomic nervous system. Sympathetic axons from the superior cervical ganglia synapse on pinealocytes where they release norepinephrine at {beta}-adrenergic receptors, which leads to an increase in cAMP and activation of melatonin synthesis (Axelrod, 1974Go). Parasympathetic cholinergic axons to the pineal gland probably originate in the sphenopalantine ganglia (Korf et al., 1996Go; Larsen et al., 1998Go). In addition, there is a central cholinergic innervation of the pineal gland from the medial habenula in some species (Schafer et al., 1998Go). Previous studies have found [3H]EB binding sites in the pineal gland, indicating the presence of nAChRs (Marks et al., 1998Go; Hernandez et al., 1999Go; Perry et al., 2002Go; Dávila-García et al., 2003Go). Moreover, application of acetylcholine to isolated pinealocytes stimulates membrane depolarization that is coupled to activation of L-type calcium channels, and this action is mimicked by nicotine and blocked by d-tubocurarine (Letz et al., 1997Go).

Previous studies have found that nAChRs mediate the inhibition of melatonin synthesis in rat pineal explants (Stankov et al., 1993Go; Yamada et al., 1998aGo). In an elegant series of studies, Yamada et al. (1996aGo,bGo, 1998aGo,bGo) established a link between pineal nAChRs, L-type calcium channels, glutamate release, metabotropic glutamate receptors, and inhibition of cAMP in a signaling pathway leading to the inhibition of melatonin synthesis. The signaling pathway begins with activation of the nAChRs, which by depolarizing the pinealocyte membrane activate L-type calcium channels. The increased intracellular Ca2+ levels trigger exocytotic release of glutamate, which activates mGluR3 metabotropic glutamate receptors and leads to decreased cAMP. This results in decreased transcriptional activation of serotonin N-acetyltransferase, the rate-limiting enzyme in melatonin synthesis. Our studies identify the nAChR in pinealocytes that begins this signaling cascade as an {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype. This conclusion is consistent with observations from previous reports. For example, our EC50 values for activation of whole-cell currents by nicotine and acetylcholine in dissociated pinealocytes are similar to the values reported for release of glutamate and inhibition of melatonin synthesis (Yamada et al., 1998aGo). Moreover, both nicotine-activated whole-cell currents (present data) and acetylcholine-induced release of glutamate (Yamada et al., 1998aGo) in pinealocytes are blocked by d-tubocurarine but not by {alpha}-BTX.

A second major finding from our studies reported here is the remarkably close correspondence between the function of {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChRs measured by whole-cell patch-clamp analysis in pinealocytes and 86Rb+ efflux in transfected HEK 293 cells that heterologously express these receptors. Thus, the EC50 values for the activation of whole-cell currents in pinealocytes by six nicotinic agonists were nearly indistinguishable from their EC50 values for the activation of 86Rb+efflux measured in HEK 293 cells expressing the {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChR subtype. Moreover, cytisine, which is a full agonist at {beta}4-containing receptors but a weak partial agonist at {beta}2-containing receptors (Luetje and Patrick, 1991Go; Papke and Heinemann, 1994Go), is a full agonist at the pineal receptor as well as at the heterologously expressed {alpha}3{beta}4 receptor (Meyer et al., 2001Go). Likewise, DMPP seems to be a partial agonist at the pineal receptors, as it is at the heterologously expressed {alpha}3{beta}4 receptors (Meyer et al., 2001Go). In addition to the evidence from the activation of the receptors by agonists, the Ki values for the competitive antagonist DH{beta}E derived from functional studies in pineal cells and the heterologously expressed {alpha}3{beta}4 receptors are nearly identical.

Nevertheless, although the pharmacological evidence that the pineal nAChR is an {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype is very strong, there are at present no drugs that can conclusively establish the identity of a heteromeric nAChR subtype. Furthermore, very little is known about the pharmacological properties of a possible {alpha}3{beta}2{beta}4 receptor (Colquhoun and Patrick, 1997Go). Therefore, the immunoprecipitation studies with subunit-specific antibodies provide the most definitive evidence for the identity of the pineal receptor subtype. Only the antibodies that recognize the {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits were effective in immunoprecipitating the nAChR in the pineal gland; moreover, immunoprecipitation with either antibody removed virtually all of the receptors from the remaining supernatant, indicating that the {alpha}3 and {beta}4 subunits are physically associated. In contrast, the {beta}2-directed antibody did not immunoprecipitate nAChRs from the pineal extracts, although it efficiently immunoprecipitated receptors from the cerebral cortex, which is known to contain nAChRs with the {beta}2 subunit, namely the {alpha}4{beta}2 subtype (Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987Go; Flores et al., 1992Go).

In summary, these studies have shown that the rat pineal gland expresses a high density of nAChRs and that this receptor is virtually exclusively an {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype. The characteristics of this receptor are consistent with the one that mediates the cholinergic signals that lead to decreased melatonin production and thereby plays an important role in pineal physiology. Thus, the rat pineal gland provides a readily obtainable native tissue with a high concentration of an identified subtype of nAChR. This should allow detailed studies of, for example, the channel properties, regulation, and turnover rate of this receptor in its native cell, as opposed to receptors expressed by transfection into heterologous cell systems. In addition, studies to determine proteins associated with the {alpha}3{beta}4 nAChR require a native tissue that expresses a high level of receptor. The pineal gland is such a tissue and should be useful for this purpose.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Dr. Scott Rogers for the generous gift of the {beta}4 subunit selective antibody and Brandon C. Cox for assistance with some of the receptor binding assays.


    Footnotes
 
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant DA12976.

Preliminary reports of this work have been presented previously: Hernandez SC, Musachio JL, Wang Y, Davila-Garia MI, Ebert S, Wolfe BB, and Kellar KJ (1999Go) The rat pineal gland expresses a nicotinic receptor with the characteristics of the {alpha}3{beta}4 subtype. Soc Neurosci Abstr 25:980; and Hernandez, SC, Vicini S, and Kellar KJ (2000) The functional characteristics of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the rat pineal gland. Soc Neurosci Abstr 26:105.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.104.002345.

ABBREVIATIONS: nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; [3H]EB, [3H](±)-epibatidine; 125I-EB, 125I-(±)-epibatidine; EB, (±)-epibatidine; 125I-{alpha}-BTX, 125I-{alpha}-bungarotoxin; {alpha}-BTX, {alpha}-bungarotoxin; EB, epibatidine; DH{beta}E, dihydro-{beta}-erythroidine; DMPP, 1,1-dimethly-4-phenylpiperazinium; HEK, human embryonic kidney; mAb, monoclonal antibody; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; BAPTA, 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid; A-85380, 3-[2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy]pyridine dihydrochloride.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Kenneth J. Kellar, Department of Pharmacology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20057. E-mail: kellark{at}georgetown.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Axelrod J (1974) The pineal gland: a neurochemical transducer. Science (Wash DC) 184: 1341-1348.[Free Full Text]

Champtiaux N, Gotti C, Cordero-Erausquin M, David DJ, Przybylski C, Lena C, Clementi F, Moretti M, Rossi FM, Le Novere N, et al. (2003) Subunit composition of functional nicotinic receptors in dopaminergic neurons investigated with knockout mice. J Neurosci 23: 7820-7829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheng Y and Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22: 3099-3108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Colquhoun LM and Patrick JW (1997) Alpha3, beta2 and beta4 form heterotrimeric neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in Xenopus oocytes. J Neurochem 69: 2355-2362.[Medline]

Conroy WG and Berg DK (1995) Neurons can maintain multiple classes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors distinguished by different subunit compositions. J Biol Chem 270: 4424-4431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Couturier S, Bertrand D, Matter JM, Hernandez MC, Bertrand S, Millar N, Valera S, Barkas T, and Ballivet M (1990) A neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit (alpha 7) is developmentally regulated and forms a homo-oligomeric channel blocked by alpha-BTX. Neuron 5: 847-856.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dávila-García MI, Musachio JL, and Kellar KJ (2003) Chronic nicotine administration does not increase nicotinic receptors labeled by [125I]epibatidine in adrenal gland, superior cervical ganglia, pineal or retina. J Neurochem 85: 1237-1246.[CrossRef][Medline]

Flores CM, DeCamp RM, Kilo S, Rogers SW, and Hargreaves KM (1996) Neuronal nicotinic receptor expression in sensory neurons of the rat trigeminal ganglion: demonstration of alpha3beta4, a novel subtype in the mammalian nervous system. J Neurosci 16: 7892-7901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Flores CM, Rogers SW, Pabreza LA, Wolfe BB, and Kellar KJ (1992) A subtype of nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is composed of {alpha}4 and {beta}2 subunits and is up-regulated by chronic nicotine treatment. Mol Pharmacol 41: 31-37.[Abstract]

Hernandez SC, Musachio JL, Wang Y, Dávila-García MI, Ebert S, Wolfe BB, and Kellar KJ (1999) The rat pineal gland expresses a nicotinic receptor with the characteristics of the alpha3beta4 subtype. Soc Neurosci Abstr 25: 98019.

Korf HW, Schomerus C, Maronde E, and Stehle JH (1996) Signal transduction molecules in the rat pineal organ: Ca2+, pCREB and ICER. Naturwissenschaften 83: 535-543.[Medline]

Larsen PJ, Enquist LW, and Card JP (1998) Characterization of the multisynaptic neuronal control of the rat pineal gland using viral transneuronal tracing. Eur J Neurosci 10: 128-145.[CrossRef][Medline]

Letz B, Schomerus C, Maronde E, Korf HW, and Korbmacher C (1997) Stimulation of a nicotinic ACh receptor causes depolarization and activation of L-type Ca2+ channels in rat pinealocytes. J Physiol 499: 329-340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Luetje CW and Patrick J (1991) Both alpha- and beta-subunits contribute to the agonist sensitivity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurosci 11: 837-845.[Abstract]

Marks MJ, Smith KW, and Collins AC (1998) Differential agonist inhibition identifies multiple epibatidine binding sites in mouse brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 285: 377-386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meyer EL, Xiao Y, and Kellar KJ (2001) Agonist regulation of rat {alpha}3 {beta}4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Mol Pharmacol 60: 568-576.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Orr-Urtreger A, Goldner FM, Saeki M, Lorenzo I, Goldberg L, De Biasi M, Dani JA, Patrick JW, and Beaudet AL (1997) Mice deficient in the alpha7 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor lack alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites and hippocampal fast nicotinic currents. J Neurosci 17: 9165-9171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Papke RL and Heinemann SF (1994) Partial agonist properties of cytisine on neuronal nicotinic receptors containing the {beta}2 subunit. Mol Pharmacol 45: 142-149.[Abstract]

Perry DC, Xiao Y, Nguyen HN, Musachio JL, Dávila-García MI, and Kellar KJ (2002) Measuring nicotinic receptors with characteristics of alpha4beta2, alpha3beta2 and alpha3beta4 subtypes in rat tissues by autoradiography. J Neurochem 82: 468-481.[CrossRef][Medline]

Quik M, Polonskaya Y, McIntosh JM, and Kulak JM (2002) Differential nicotinic receptor expression in monkey basal ganglia: effects of nigrostriatal damage. Neuroscience 112: 619-630.[CrossRef][Medline]

Salminen O, Murphy KL, McIntosh JM, Drago J, Marks MJ, Collins AC, and Grady SR (2004) Subunit composition and pharmacology of two classes of striatal presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors mediating dopamine release in mice. Mol Pharmacol 65: 1526-1535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schafer MK, Eiden LE, and Weihe E (1998) Cholinergic neurons and terminal fields revealed by immunohistochemistry for the vesicular acetylcholine transporter. I. Central nervous system. Neuroscience 84: 331-359.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schoepfer R, Conroy WG, Whiting P, Gore M, and Lindstrom J (1990) Brain alpha-bungarotoxin binding protein cDNAs and MAbs reveal subtypes of this branch of the ligand-gated ion channel gene superfamily. Neuron 5: 35-48.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stankov B, Cimino M, Marini P, Lucini V, Fraschini F, and Clementi F (1993) Identification and functional significance of nicotinic cholinergic receptors in the rat pineal gland. Neurosci Lett 156: 131-134.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wada E, Wada K, Boulter J, Deneris E, Heinemann S, Patrick J, and Swanson LW (1989) Distribution of alpha2, alpha3, alpha4 and beta2 neuronal nicotinic receptor subunit mRNAs in the central nervous system: a hybridization histochemical study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 284: 314-335.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wall SJ, Yasuda RP, Hory F, Flagg S, Martin BM, Ginns EI, and Wolfe BB (1991) Production of antisera selective for m1 muscarinic receptors using fusion proteins: distribution of m1 receptors in rat brain. Mol Pharmacol 39: 643-649.[Abstract]

Whiting P and Lindstrom J (1987) Purification and characterization of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 595-599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xiao Y and Kellar KJ (2004) The comparative pharmacology and up-regulation of rat neuronal nicotinic receptor subtype binding sites stably expressed in transfected mammalian cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310: 98-107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xiao Y, Meyer EL, Thompson JM, Surin A, Wroblewski J, and Kellar KJ (1998) Rat {alpha}3/{beta}4 subtype of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor stably expressed in a transfected cell line: pharmacology of ligand binding and function. Mol Pharmacol 54: 322-333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xu W, Gelber S, Orr-Urtreger A, Armstrong D, Lewis RA, Ou CN, Patrick J, Role L, De Biasi M, and Beaudet AL (1999) Megacystis, mydriasis and ion channel defect in mice lacking the {alpha}3 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 5746-5751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada H, Ogura A, Koizumi S, Yamaguchi A, and Moriyama Y (1998a) Acetylcholine triggers L-glutamate exocytosis via nicotinic receptors and inhibits melatonin synthesis in rat pinealocytes. J Neurosci 18: 4946-4952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada H, Yamamoto A, Takahashi M, Michibata H, Kumon H, and Moriyama Y (1996a) The L-type Ca2+ channel is involved in microvesicle-mediated glutamate exocytosis from rat pinealocytes. J Pineal Res 21: 165-174.[Medline]

Yamada H, Yamamoto A, Yodozawa S, Kozaki S, Takahashi M, Morita M, Michibata H, Furuichi T, Mikoshiba K, and Moriyama Y (1996b) Microvesicle-mediated exocytosis of glutamate is a novel paracrine-like chemical transduction mechanism and inhibits melatonin secretion in rat pinealocytes. J Pineal Res 21: 175-191.[Medline]

Yamada H, Yatsushiro S, Ishio S, Hayashi M, Nushi T, Yamamoto A, Futai M, Yamaguchi A, and Moriyama Y (1998b) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Negatively Regulate Melatonin Synthesis in Rat Pinealocytes. J Neurosci 18: 2056-2062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yeh JJ, Yasuda RP, Davila-Garcia MI, Xiao Y, Ebert S, Gupta T, Kellar KJ, and Wolfe BB (2001) Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha3 subunit protein in rat brain and sympathetic ganglion measured using a subunit-specific antibody: regional and ontogenic expression. J Neurochem 77: 336-346.[Medline]

Zoli M, Le Novere N, Hill JA, and Changeux JP (1995) Developmental regulation of nicotinic ACh receptor subunit mRNAs in the rat central and peripheral nervous systems. J Neurosci 15: 1912-1939.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. C. Perry, D. Mao, A. B. Gold, J. M. McIntosh, J. C. Pezzullo, and K. J. Kellar
Chronic Nicotine Differentially Regulates {alpha}6- and beta3-Containing Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in Rat Brain
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 306 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. Mao, R. P. Yasuda, H. Fan, B. B. Wolfe, and K. J. Kellar
Heterogeneity of Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in Rat Superior Cervical and Nodose Ganglia
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1693 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
X. Xu, M. M. Scott, and E. S. Deneris
Shared Long-Range Regulatory Elements Coordinate Expression of a Gene Cluster Encoding Nicotinic Receptor Heteromeric Subtypes
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2006; 26(15): 5636 - 5649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Ohtani, T. Oka, M. Badyuk, Y. Xiao, K. J. Kellar, and J. W. Daly
Mouse beta-TC6 Insulinoma Cells: High Expression of Functional {alpha}3beta4 Nicotinic Receptors Mediating Membrane Potential, Intracellular Calcium, and Insulin Release
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 69(3): 899 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. M. Marritt, B. C. Cox, R. P. Yasuda, J. M. McIntosh, Y. Xiao, B. B. Wolfe, and K. J. Kellar
Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in the Rat Retina: Simple and Mixed Heteromeric Subtypes
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1656 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. R. Turner and K. J. Kellar
Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in the Rat Cerebellum: Multiple Heteromeric Subtypes
J. Neurosci., October 5, 2005; 25(40): 9258 - 9265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.002345v1
66/4/978    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kellar, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kellar, K. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics