![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Received May 12, 2004; accepted August 11, 2004
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Materials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
; Ducore et al., 1982; Hansson et al., 1987). This is consistent with the well-established fact that, for several classes of DNA-reactive drugs, two alkylating groups per molecule are necessary for cytotoxic and anticancer efficacy (Ross, 1962; Tokuda and Bodell, 1987; Monks et al., 2001). In addition to the direct consequences of cross-links on molecular processes, it is widely held that DNA-damaging anticancer drugs cause cell death by initiating apoptosis (Evans et al., 1994; Fan et al., 1994). In this context, the mechanisms by which cells detect and respond to DNA damage are important and should be similar to cytotoxicity in their dependence on bi- versus monofunctionality of an alkylating agent. An important response to DNA damage is p53 elevation, especially because, in certain cells, this has been implicated in inducing apoptosis (Lowe et al., 1993).
Interstrand cross-links form only a small minority of the total DNA adducts formed by cross-linking drugs. In the case of nitrogen-mustard compounds such as melphalan, the majority of adducts formed are monofunctional (Osborne and Lawley, 1993; Osborne et al., 1995b). Mechanisms that sense DNA damage are poorly understood (Iliakis et al., 2003), and there is a paucity of information to define the relationships between biochemical responses of cells to DNA-damaging agents and quantities of specific types of DNA damage. For example, increases in p53 levels after exposure of cells to nitrogen-mustard agents could be triggered by all or just certain of the various types of DNA modification, as exemplified in an analysis of the relationships between p53 response and specific types of DNA adducts resulting from exposure to the anticancer drug mitomycin C (Abbas et al., 2002). Attempts to fully understand cellular responses to drug exposure are further complicated by changes with time in the quality and quantity of modifications present in the DNA caused by the differing kinetics of their formation and their repair. A detailed analysis of these relationships for various classes of DNA damage is relevant to understanding the mechanisms of damage detection that underlie biochemical responses and also the relationship between p53 response and drug action.
The results presented here concern the bifunctional nitrogen-mustard drug melphalan (Fig. 2). Unlike mitomycin C (Abbas et al., 2002), this agent alkylates DNA exclusively at guanine N7 and adenine N3 (Tilby et al., 1990; Osborne and Lawley, 1992, 1993; Osborne et al., 1995a). We have described previously the preparation of a monofunctional derivative of melphalan, monohydroxymelphalan (Fig. 2), that is free of contamination with the bifunctional compound (Tilby et al., 1998). The DNA adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan were compared with those formed by melphalan and were shown to be identical in nature and DNA sequence-related distribution, except that, as predicted, cross-linked products (guanine-guanine and guanine-adenine) were not formed after the monohydroxymelphalan treatment (Tilby et al., 1998). We have also described a sensitive immunoassay for DNA adducts induced by melphalan (Tilby et al., 1987). This was shown to be applicable to clinical specimens (Tilby et al., 1993) and, with equal sensitivity, to adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan (Tilby et al., 1998). These tools permit a detailed comparison of the cellular effects of chemically equivalent mono- and bifunctional adducts formed by a drug that is representative of, and relevant to, a large number of chemically and mechanistically related drugs, including agents currently being developed for targeted therapies (Melton et al., 1996).
|
We present here results showing quantification and characterization of DNA damage induced in cells by melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan, rates of DNA repair, and cytotoxic effects. We also describe the initial characterization of the p53 response to this damage. The data show that, compared with adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan, the adducts formed by melphalan are 4- to 8-fold more effective at inducing p53, but this difference is considerably less than the difference in cytotoxic efficacies.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Culture Conditions and Drug Exposure. All cells were grown in HEPES-buffered RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with fetal calf serum [10% (v/v)], glutamine (300 mg/l), penicillin (50 U/ml), streptomycin (50 µg/ml), and neomycin (100 µg/ml) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Monohydroxymelphalan was prepared as described previously (Tilby et al., 1998). Solutions of melphalan (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and monohydroxymelphalan were prepared in acidified ethanol (Tilby et al., 1993) immediately before use and then diluted into culture medium to give final ethanol concentrations of 1% (v/v) for controls and for all exposures to alkylating agents. Cells were incubated with drug for 1 h at 37°C, and then drug was removed from the cells by centrifugation (190g for 5 min at 25°C) and washing with PBS. When cells were to be incubated further, washing was with prewarmed medium, and cells were subsequently resuspended in fresh medium at their original density.
Cytotoxicity. ML-1 cells (5 x 105/ml) were exposed to drug for 1 h, washed by centrifugation with PBS, and resuspended in medium. Aliquots of cell suspensions (100 µl) were transferred to wells of 96-well plates and incubated for 6 days before adding XTT reagent (Roehm et al., 1991) (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Optical density (465 nm) was measured after additional incubation (6 h). Cells (>200 per sample) were scored for frequency of apoptotic nuclear morphology by fluorescence microscopy using cultures fixed with methanol/glacial acetic acid (3:1) and stained with Hoechst dye 33258 (10 µM).
Antibodies. Mouse monoclonal antibodies against p53 (DO1 and PAb1801) and p21 (Ab-1) were from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Rabbit anti-p53 polyclonal antiserum was obtained from Scottish Antibody Production Unit (Carluke, Lanarkshire, Scotland).
Irradiation. Cells, in culture medium, either as suspensions (ML-1) or while attached to 25-cm2 flasks (MCF7) were exposed to 
irradiation from a 137Cs source (Gammacell 1000; MDS Nordion, Ottawa, ON, Canada) at 3.64 Gray/min.
Preparation of Cell Lysates for p53 Analyses. Lysis solution was 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% Nonidet P-40. Protease inhibitors (aprotinin, pepstatin, chymostatin, and leupeptin, each at 1 µg/ml, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 0.5 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) were added immediately before use. MCF7 cells were washed with 0°C PBS and 400 µl of lysis solution added per culture flask. Each flask was then placed on ice for 30 min before the cells were scraped and transferred to a 1.5-ml centrifuge tube. ML-1 cells were washed with PBS by centrifugation (190g for 5 min at 25°C). To each pellet of approximately 1 x 107 cells, 500 µl of lysis solution was added, followed by incubation for 30 min on ice. All lysates were centrifuged (18,000g for 30 min at 4°C), and the supernatants were collected.
Protein Estimation. Total protein concentrations of cellular lysates were determined in relation to bovine serum albumin (BSA) standards using the Bio-Rad detergent-compatible protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting. To cell lysates, concentrated Laemmli sample buffer was added to give the following final concentrations: 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 0.005% (w/v) bromphenol blue, and 5% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol. Samples were heated at 95°C for 4 min and analyzed using 5% stacking and 13% separating gels. Equal quantities (75 µg) of protein from each sample were loaded. Separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes that were then incubated (for 1 h at 20°C) in a solution of dried milk powder [5% (w/v)] in PBST. Membranes were incubated with primary antibody (for 1 h at 20°C), washed several times with PBST, and then incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse second antibody. After several further washes with PBST, final detection was by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences UK, Ltd., Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK).
ELISA for p53. A sandwich immunoassay was developed for the quantification of p53. Monoclonal anti-p53 antibody (DO-1 or 1801) solution (500 ng/ml) in NaHCO3 solution (1 M), pH 9.6, was added (50 µl/well) to 96-well ELISA plates (medium or high bind grades; Greiner Labortechnik, Stonehouse, UK). After incubation overnight at 4°C, the plates were washed once with PBS and then incubated with blocking solution [6% (w/v) BSA in PBS, 200 µl/well, for 2 h at 20°C]. All subsequent washing steps were with PBST. The plates were washed (4x), and then cell lysate or p53 standard (recombinant p53 kindly provided by Dr. D. P. Lane, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK) diluted in sample buffer [150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, 1% (w/v) BSA, 0.1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and 0.02% (w/v) NaN3, pH 8.0] was added (50 µl/well). After incubation overnight at 4°C, the plates were washed (4x), and 50 µl of rabbit anti-p53 antiserum diluted 20,000-fold in ELISA buffer (PBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA and 0.1% Tween 20) was added to each well. After incubation (for 2 h at 20°C) and then further washes (4x), goat anti-rabbit biotin conjugate (diluted x10,000 in ELISA buffer; Sigma-Aldrich) was added (50 µl/well), and the plates were incubated for 1 h (at 37°C). The plates were then washed (4x), and streptavidin 
-galactosidase conjugate was added (50 µl/well, diluted 5000x in ELISA buffer containing 10 mM MgCl2; Roche Diagnostics). After incubation (for 1 h at 37°C), the plates were washed (5x), and substrate solution was added (50 µl/well of 80 µg/ml 4-methylumbelliferyl -D-galactoside in PBS containing 10 mM MgCl2). After incubation (at 37°C for 3 h), the fluorescence was measured in a plate reader (excitation, 354 nm; emission, 445 nm; Dynex MFX; DYNEX Technologies, Inc., Chantilly, VA).
Validation of p53 ELISA. Standard curves were linear and reproducible (interassay coefficient of variation for slope of the standard curve = 30%). Interassay coefficient of variation for the determination of p53 content of a quality-control standard (lysate of RAJI cells) was 14%, and the average detection limit (concentration of p53 giving a signal 2 S.D. above the signal for zero p53) was 0.05 ng p53/ml. Figure 1 shows the good agreement between ELISA and immunoblot assays performed on the same lysates of MCF-7 cells at various times after exposure to ionizing radiation (4 Gy). The changes are consistent with previous data for this cell line (Wieler et al., 2003).
|
DNA Extraction and Immunoassay of DNA Adducts. DNA extraction and competitive ELISA methods using monoclonal antibody MP5/73 were performed as described elsewhere (Tilby et al., 1987, 1991, 1993). This technique shows equal sensitivity for DNA adducts formed by melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan (Tilby et al., 1998); nevertheless, independent standards of DNA alkylated with the appropriate radioactively labeled alkylating agent were included in every assay.
Alkaline Elution. This assay was performed essentially according to the methods used by Kohn et al. (1981). ML-1 cells were incubated for 24 h in medium containing [14C]thymidine (specific activity, 52 mCi/mmol, 0.016 µCi/ml) or, for internal standards, [3H]thymidine (specific activity, 41 mCi/mmol, 0.1 µCi/ml). Before use, all cells were incubated for a further 4 h in the absence of radiolabeled thymidine. Internal standard cells were irradiated with 3 Gy of ionizing radiation. All cells were kept at 0°C until lysis. Equal numbers (106) of experimental and standard cells were mixed and collected on a polycarbonate filter (Whatman 0.2-µm pore size, in the dark at 4°C). After lysis (2 ml of 2% (w/v) SDS and 25 mM EDTA, pH 9.7), filters were incubated with an additional 1.5 ml of lysis buffer containing proteinase K (0.5 mg/ml for 1 h at 20°C). During elution of DNA (33 µl/min), pH 12.1, 8 x 90-min fractions were collected per filter, and DNA elution was calculated from radioactivity measured using a liquid scintillation counter.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
, 1993, 1998). Over the ranges used, the levels of adducts were linearly related to the concentration of alkylating agent (Fig. 2). The mean (± S.D.) slopes of the linear regression lines from three independent experiments were 8.2 (± 1.5) and 17.3 (± 5.6) nmol adduct/g of DNA per µg of alkylating agent/ml, for melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan, respectively. Monohydroxymelphalan induced the formation of 2.1-fold higher levels of immunoreactive adducts than did the same concentrations of melphalan. To investigate the change in adduct level with time, ML-1 cells were exposed for 1 h to concentrations of melphalan or monohydroxymelphalan that gave similar initial adduct levels (melphalan at 10 or 20 µg/ml, monohydroxymelphalan at 5 and 10 µg/ml). After further incubation for various periods in drug-free medium, samples were harvested and frozen. Adduct levels (Fig. 3) were maintained or increased slightly (by 10–46%) during the first 8 h after removal of alkylating agent and declined by 27 to 44% of the peak levels by 24 h.
|
Alkaline Elution Analyses. With regard to their effects on cells, the most significant difference between melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan is probably the inability of the latter compound to form DNA interstrand cross-links. This inability was confirmed by alkaline elution experiments using ML-1 cells exposed for 1 h to various concentrations of melphalan or monohydroxymelphalan. For analysis of cross-links, the cells were irradiated before lysis. Other samples were analyzed without irradiation both to act as controls for the cross-linking assays and to investigate the possibility that DNA single-strand breaks were formed during repair of melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan adducts. Initial assays were performed immediately after the exposure period (Fig. 4). As expected (Ross et al., 1978; Ducore et al., 1982; Millar et al., 1986; Hansson et al., 1987), melphalan caused a concentration-dependent reduction in the elution rate of DNA from irradiated cells but did not affect the elution of DNA from nonirradiated cells. Monohydroxymelphalan did not cause a significant decrease in the elution rate of DNA from irradiated cells, consistent with the expected lack of interstrand cross-links. However, monohydroxymelphalan did cause a concentration-dependent increase in the elution of DNA from nonirradiated cells, indicating that exposure to monohydroxymelphalan leads to the formation of DNA strand breaks. The changes with time in levels of cross-links and strand breaks for melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan, respectively, were studied to determine repair rates and to relate damage levels at different times to p53 induction. ML-1 cells were exposed to melphalan (10 µg/ml) or monohydroxymelphalan (5 µg/ml) for 1 h. These concentrations were chosen so as to result in similar initial levels of total adducts (Fig. 2) and to be as low as possible, consistent with reliable quantification of DNA damage. Cells exposed to melphalan were irradiated before analysis. For these cells, the retention of DNA increased with time and then decreased (Fig. 5). Cells exposed to monohydroxymelphalan were not irradiated, and at all time points studied, the DNA from these cells eluted to a significantly greater extent than did DNA from control cells (Fig. 5). This degree of elution did not change markedly over the time period studied.
|
|
Elevation of p53. ML-1 cells were exposed to melphalan or monohydroxymelphalan at a range of concentrations for 1 h and were then washed free of drug. Untreated cells were subjected to the same washing steps. After further incubation for 0, 1, 3, 5, and 24 h, samples of cells were harvested and stored at -20°C. As positive controls, in each experiment, additional cells were exposed to 4 Gy of ionizing radiation and were harvested after further incubation for the same time intervals. The ELISA method involving antibody DO-1 was used to measure the p53 concentrations in relation to total protein in cell lysates. Very similar data were obtained when antibody 1801 was used instead of DO-1. The samples used for measurement of DNA adducts (Fig. 2) were removed from the same cultures as were used for the p53 assays. After ionizing radiation, in each of three separate experiments, the level of p53 increased by approximately 5-fold after 3 h and had started to decrease by 5 h (Fig. 6). Untreated cells consistently showed a small variation in p53 level after the washing step. Exposure of ML-1 cells to monohydroxymelphalan resulted in higher adduct levels than exposure to equal concentrations of melphalan (Figs. 2 and 3). Because p53 response is induced by DNA damage, it is most relevant to present the data in relation to adduct level. Figures 7 and 8 show averaged data from the three independent experiments. Figure 7 shows the relationship between adduct level (immediately after exposure) and p53 level at various times after exposure to melphalan or monohydroxymelphalan. Adducts formed by melphalan were more effective than adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan at inducing an increase in p53 at the 3-, 5-, and 24-h time points. This difference is shown more clearly when selected data are plotted against time. Data for exposure to melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan at 5 and 10 or 10 and 20 µg/ml, respectively, are compared in Fig. 8. These pairs of concentrations each induced similar initial levels of DNA adducts. The p53 elevation after exposure to melphalan or monohydroxymelphalan followed similar time courses, but the p53 levels induced by melphalan attained levels 2- to 3-fold higher than were induced by equal levels of adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan.
|
|
|
Elevation of p21. ML-1 cells were exposed to melphalan (20 µg/ml) or monohydroxymelphalan (10 µg/ml) for 1 h. These concentrations induced similar levels of total DNA adducts (Figs. 2 and 3). At various times after the end of the treatment, samples were removed and stored at -20°C. Parallel cultures were irradiated (4 Gy) or untreated. Cells were lysed and analyzed by immunoblotting for p21 expression (Fig. 9). Clear increases in p21 level were detectable at 3 and 5 h after ionizing radiation. There was a strong signal for p21 at 24 h after melphalan, with a weak signal at 5 h. Weak signals were seen at 24 h after monohydroxymelphalan.
|
Assessment of Cytotoxicity. Cytotoxicity induced by melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan was assessed by growth-inhibition assay using the XTT method (Fig. 10A). The IC50 value for monohydroxymelphalan (28.1 ± S.D., 1.6 µg/ml) was approximately 23 times higher than for melphalan (1.2 ± 0.4 µg/ml). DNA adduct levels formed at those IC50 values indicate that adducts formed by melphalan were approximately 45 times more toxic than the adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan (Table 1). Observations on nuclear morphology (Fig. 10B), trypan blue exclusion, and total cell numbers (data not shown) indicated that after exposure to concentrations of melphalan or monohydroxymelphalan (even up to 50 µg melphalan/ml), there was no overt sign of cells dying at up to 24 h after exposure. Frequency of apoptotic cells became elevated only at later time points.
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
) or an influence of local DNA sequence on adduct recognition by antibody MP5/73 (McCartney et al., 2001), especially because melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan displayed indistinguishable patterns of sequence-dependent alkylation (Tilby et al., 1998). The higher adduct levels after exposure to monohydroxymelphalan did not result from slower adduct removal (Fig. 3) but were probably caused by differences in cellular uptake or inactivation processes. Melphalan is taken up by amino acid transport systems that discriminate between melphalan and hydrolyzed melphalan (Begleiter et al., 1979).
The transient increase in levels of immunoreactive adducts after removal of alkylating agent (Fig. 3) resembled previous observations (Tilby et al., 1993) and is attributed to the continued reaction of retained intracellular melphalan. Reduction in adduct levels with time did not result from dilution through DNA synthesis or from selective loss of highly damaged cells, because during the 24 h after exposure to melphalan or monohydroxymelphalan, there were no significant increases in intact or apoptotic cells, and adduct levels in individual cells were relatively homogeneous (Frank and Tilby, 2003). Spontaneous hydrolytic loss of melphalan-guanine adducts was probably only a minor contribution because the reaction half-life was 110 h at pH 7 (Osborne and Lawley, 1993). The melphalan concentrations used (10 and 20 µg/ml) were many-fold higher than its IC50 (1.2 µg/ml). However, it is unlikely that adduct removal was significantly diminished through toxicity because similar rates of adduct loss were seen with comparable levels of monohydroxymelphalan adducts. These had been induced by concentrations of monohydroxymelphalan (5 and 10 µg/ml) much lower than its IC50 (28 µg/ml). The low rates of removal of melphalan-DNA adducts were consistent with data on clinical samples and a different cell line (Tilby et al., 1993) and with the inefficient removal of melphalan-DNA adducts by mammalian 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase (Mattes et al., 1996). It is important to note that throughout the period during which DNA interstrand cross-links, single-strand breaks and p53 levels were studied, immunoreactive DNA adducts remained at relatively high levels.
Bifunctional DNA adducts were undetectable in purified DNA reacted with monohydroxymelphalan (Tilby et al., 1998). The present work confirms the absence of detectable DNA interstrand cross-links in cells exposed to monohydroxymelphalan even at 50 µg/ml (Fig. 4). The increased rate of elution of DNA from cells exposed to monohydroxymelphalan and not irradiated (Fig. 4) indicated the formation of DNA strand breaks. The approximately steady-state level of strand breaks over 2 to 24 h after exposure to monohydroxymelphalan (Fig. 5) presumably resulted from ongoing DNA repair.
Cells exposed to melphalan probably carried single-strand breaks at levels similar to those formed after exposure to monohydroxymelphalan. Failure to detect single-strand breaks in nonirradiated cells exposed to melphalan (Fig. 4) illustrates masking of single-strand breaks by the simultaneous presence of interstrand cross-links. Retardation of DNA elution after melphalan exposure reached a maximum several hours after removal of the drug (Fig. 5), which is consistent with other reports (Ross et al., 1978) concluding that interstrand cross-links form through slow second-arm reactions. An alternative explanation, apparently not ruled out, was that the reduction in elution rate with time resulted from a reduction in single-strand breaks after completion of repair of the more numerous monofunctional adducts. The present data exclude this explanation for melphalan in ML-1 cells. However, the delayed increase in interstrand cross-links could have resulted from delayed increase in total alkylation rather than just from second-arm reactions.
The observation that melphalan was approximately 23-fold more cytotoxic than monohydroxymelphalan is consistent with data for other alkylating agents in vivo (Ross, 1962) and in cell lines (Tokuda and Bodell, 1987; Monks et al., 2002; Palom et al., 2002). DNA adducts induced by melphalan were actually approximately 45 times more cytotoxic than the adducts induced by monohydroxymelphalan.
ML-1 cells are wild-type for p53, exhibit normal p53 responses, express low levels of p53 (comparable with levels found in normal tissues and many tumors), and have been used for key studies of p53 (Kastan et al., 1991; Houser et al., 2001; Abbas et al., 2002). The low levels of p53 observed in this study and the extent and time scale of changes induced by ionizing irradiation (Fig. 6) are consistent with previous data (Kastan et al., 1991). For equivalent overall levels of DNA adducts, melphalan was more effective than monohydroxymelphalan at inducing p53 elevation (Fig. 7). The levels of DNA adducts necessary to cause elevation of p53 by approximately 4-fold (to 2 ng/mg protein) at various times after exposure to alkylating agent were estimated (Table 1). Adducts formed by melphalan were 5- to 8-fold more effective at causing this elevation than adducts formed by monohydroxymelphalan. This did not result from greater persistence of total melphalan adducts and was therefore caused by intra- and/or interstrand DNA cross-links. These could have triggered p53 elevation directly (Achanta et al., 2001; Unsal-Kacmaz et al., 2002) or through repair intermediates such as DNA double-strand breaks (Nelson and Kastan 1994; Huang et al., 1996).
Level of DNA adducts is an important determinant of biochemical response to drug exposure and a good basis for comparing experimental and clinical conditions. However, relevant data on adduct levels in patients are available for very few drugs. Levels of DNA adducts formed in ML-1 cells after 1-h exposures to 2.5 and 5 µg/ml melphalan were in the same range as levels present in normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells removed from patients 1 h after administration of high-dose melphalan (Tilby et al., 1993). In a patient with plasma cell leukemia, adduct levels in tumor cells were higher at approximately 80 nmol/g DNA, equivalent to the levels in ML-1 cells after 1-h exposure to 10 µg/ml melphalan. Thus, the p53 responses described here were induced by levels of DNA damage shown to be clinically relevant.
The present study is unusual in combining quantification of both p53 and specific DNA modifications. However, the data do not exclude the possibility that differential post-translational modification of p53 after exposure to melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan leads to markedly different downstream consequences (Meyer et al., 1999; Gottifredi et al., 2001). From semiquantitative assessment, p21 expression (Fig. 9) seemed to follow a pattern similar to that of overall p53 elevation and thus provided no evidence for differential effects on this aspect of p53 function.
In the present work, elevation of p53 has been related to overall growth inhibition rather than specifically to apoptosis. The role of apoptosis in response to p53 activation will depend on the cell-line–specific expression of many downstream components (Villunger et al., 2003). Loss of p53 function has been linked to drug resistance through failure to engage apoptosis (Lowe et al., 1993). If, as implied in this model, elevation of p53 plays a significant role in mediating the cytotoxic effects of melphalan, then after clinically relevant drug exposures, p53 responses should be induced much more effectively by melphalan than by monohydroxymelphalan adducts. Melphalan-DNA adducts were 8-fold more efficient at causing p53 elevation than monohydroxymelphalan adducts (Table 1). However, this was considerably less than the 45-fold higher efficiency of melphalan adducts at causing cytotoxicity. Thus, either initial p53 elevation was of minor importance for melphalan-induced cytotoxicity, or the two agents induced different patterns of post-translational modifications of p53.
At its IC50 concentration (1.2 µg/ml or 9.3 nmol adducts/g DNA), melphalan would not cause significant elevation of p53 (Fig. 7). This contrasts with monohydroxymelphalan, which, at its much higher IC50 concentration (28.1 µg/ml or 420 nmol adducts/g DNA) caused a very marked elevation of p53 (Fig. 7). In the absence of more detailed analysis of p53 quality, the current data are consistent with a model in which melphalan and related drugs are effective anticancer agents because they form cytotoxic cross-links at levels of overall DNA damage too low to trigger a major p53 response to the initial damage. Thus, cell-cycle progression would commence with a critically damaged genome. In contrast, initial p53 response could be more important for the cytotoxic effects of monohydroxymelphalan, for which higher levels of DNA adducts are necessary to kill cells.
It now will be of interest to define in greater detail the comparative effects of melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan on various p53 post-translational modifications and on downstream consequences, such as changes in the expression of the numerous p53-dependent genes (Villunger et al., 2003). Comparison of effects of melphalan and monohydroxymelphalan on cell-cycle progression and various DNA damage responses such as formation of nuclear foci of phosphorylated histone H2AX are also being undertaken. The present analysis of DNA damage formed by matched mono- and bifunctional alkylating agents constitutes a foundation on which such further studies of cell responses can be based.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PBST, phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20; XTT, 3'-[1-(phenylaminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]-bis (4-methoxy-6-nitro) benzene sulfonic acid hydrate; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; BSA, bovine serum albumin.
Address correspondence to: Dr. M. J. Tilby, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, University of Newcastle, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. E-mail: m.j.tilby{at}ncl.ac.uk
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Achanta G, Pelicano H, Feng L, Plunkett W, and Huang P (2001) Interaction of p53 and DNA-PK in response to nucleoside analogues: potential role as a sensor complex for DNA damage. Cancer Res 61: 8723-8729.
Begleiter A, Lam H-YP, Grover J, Froese E, and Goldenberg GJ (1979) Evidence for active transport of melphalan by two amino acid carriers in L5178Y lymphoblasts in vitro. Cancer Res 39: 353-359.[Medline]
Ducore JM, Erickson LC, Zwelling LA, Laurent G, and Kohn KW (1982) Comparative studies of DNA cross-linking and cytotoxicity in Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines treated with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and L-phenylalanine mustard. Cancer Res 42: 897-902.
Evans DL, Tilby MJ, and Dive C (1994) Differential sensitivity to the induction of apoptosis by cisplatin in proliferating and quiescent immature rat thymocytes is independent of the levels of drug accumulation and DNA adduct formation. Cancer Res 54: 1596-1603.
Fan S, El-Deiry WS, Bae I, Freeman J, Jondle D, Bhatia K, Fornace AJ Jr, Magrath I, Kohn KW, and O'Connor PM (1994) P53 gene mutations are associated with decreased sensitivity of human lymphoma cells to DNA damaging agents. Cancer Res 54: 5824-5830.
Frank AJ and Tilby MJ (2003) Quantification of DNA adducts in individual cells by immunofluorescence: effects of variation in DNA conformation. Exp Cell Res 283: 127-134.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gottifredi V, Shieh S-Y, Taya Y, and Prives C (2001) p53 accumulates but is functionally impaired when DNA synthesis is blocked. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1036-1041.
Hansson J, Lewensohn R, Ringborg U, and Nilsson B (1987) Formation and removal of DNA cross-links induced by melphalan and nitrogen mustard in relation to drug-induced cytotoxicity in human melanoma cells. Cancer Res 47: 2631-2637.
Houser S, Koshlatyi S, Lu T, Gopen T, and Bargonetti J (2001) Camptothecin and zeocin can increase p53 levels during all cell cycle stages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289: 998-1009.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huang L-C, Clarkin KC, and Wahl GM (1996) Sensitivity and selectivity of the DNA damage sensor responsible for activating p53-dependent G1 arrest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 4827-4832.
Iliakis G, Wang Y, Guan J, and Wang H (2003) DNA damage checkpoint control in cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 22: 5834-5847.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kastan MB, Onyekewere O, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, and Craig RW (1991) Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res 51: 6304-6311.[Medline]
Kohn KW, Ewig RAG, Erickson LC, and Zwelling LA (1981) Measurement of strand breaks and cross links by alkaline elution, in DNA Repair: A Laboratory Manual of Research Procedures (Hanawalt PC and Friedberg EC eds) pp 379-401, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T, and Housman DE (1993) P53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell 74: 957-967.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mattes WB, Lee C-S, Laval J, and O'Connor TR (1996) Excision of DNA adducts of nitrogen mustards by bacterial and mammalian 3-methyladenine-DNA glysosylases. Carcinogenesis 17: 643-648.
McCartney H, Martin AM, Middleton PG, and Tilby MJ (2001) Antibody recognition of melphalan adducts characterized using immobilized DNA: enhanced alkylation of G-rich regions in cells compared to in vitro. Chem Res Toxicol 14: 71-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
Melton RG, Knox R, and Connors TA (1996) Antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT). Drugs Future 21: 167-181.
Meyer KM, Hess SM, Tlsty TD, and Leadon SA (1999) Human mammary epithelial cells exhibit a differential p53-mediated response following exposure to ionizing radiation or UV light. Oncogene 18: 5795-5805.[CrossRef][Medline]
Millar BC, Tilby MJ, Ormerod MG, Payne AWR, Jinks S, and Loverock PS (1986) Comparative studies of total cross-linking, cell survival and cell cycle perturbations in Chinese hamster cells treated with alkylating agents in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol 35: 1163-1169.[CrossRef][Medline]
Monks NR, Blakey DC, Curtin NJ, East SJ, Heuze A, and Newell DR (2001) Induction of apoptosis by the ADEPT agent ZD2767: comparison with the classical nitrogen mustard chlorambucil and a monofunctional ZD2767 analogue. Br J Cancer 85: 764-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
Monks NR, Blakey DC, East SJ, Dowell RI, Calvete JA, Curtin NJ, Arris CE, and Newell DR (2002) DNA interstrand cross-linking and TP53 status as determinants of tumour cell sensitivity in vitro to the antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy ZD2767. Eur J Cancer 38: 1543-1552.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nelson WG and Kastan MB (1994) DNA strand breaks: the DNA template alterations that trigger p53-dependent DNA damage response pathways. Mol Cell Biol 14: 1815-1823.
Osborne MR and Lawley PD (1992) The reaction of melphalan with deoxyguanosine and deoxyguanylic acid. Chem Biol Interact 84: 189-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
Osborne MR and Lawley PD (1993) Alkylation of DNA by melphalan with special reference to adenine derivatives and adenine-guanine cross-linking. Chem Biol Interact 89: 49-60.[CrossRef][Medline]
Osborne MR, Lawley PD, Crofton-Sleigh C, and Warren W (1995a) Products from alkylation of DNA in cells by melphalan: human soft tissue sarcoma cell line RD and Escherichia Coli WP2. Chem Biol Interact 97: 287-296.[CrossRef][Medline]
Osborne MR, Wilman DEV, and Lawley PD (1995b) Alkylation of DNA by the nitrogen mustard bis(2-chloroethyl)methylamine. Chem Res Toxicol 8: 316-320.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palom Y, Suresh KG, Tang LQ, Paz MM, Musser SM, Rockwell S, and Tomasz M (2002) Relative toxicities of DNA cross-links and monoadducts: new insights from studies of decarbamoyl mitomycin C and mitomycin C. Chem Res Toxicol 15: 1398-1406.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roehm NW, Rodgers GH, Hatfield SM, and Glasebrook AL (1991) An improved colorimetric assay for cell proliferation and viability utilizing the tetrazolium salt XTT. J Immunol Methods 142: 257-265.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ross WCJ (1962) Biological Alkylating Agents. Butterworths, London.
Ross WE, Ewig RAG, and Kohn KW (1978) Differences between melphalan and nitrogen mustard in the formation and removal of DNA cross-links. Cancer Res 38: 1502-1506.
Tilby MJ, Johnson C, Knox R, Cordell J, Roberts JJ, and Dean CJ (1991) Sensitive detection of DNA modifications induced by cisplatin and carboplatin in vitro and in vivo using a monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res 51: 123-129.
Tilby MJ, Lawley PD, and Farmer PB (1990) Alkylation of DNA by melphalan in relation to immunoassay of melphalan-DNA adducts: characterization of monoalkylated and cross-linked products from reaction of melphalan with DGMP and GMP. Chem Biol Interact 73: 183-194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tilby MJ, McCartney H, Gould KA, O'Hare CC, Hartley JA, Hall AG, Golding BT, and Lawley PD (1998) A monofunctional derivative of melphalan: preparation, DNA alkylation products and determination of the specificity of monoclonal antibodies that recognize melphalan-DNA adducts. Chem Res Toxicol 11: 1162-1168.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tilby MJ, Newell DR, Viner C, Selby PJ, and Dean CJ (1993) Application of a sensitive immunoassay to the study of DNA adducts formed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients undergoing high-dose melphalan therapy. Eur J Cancer 29A: 681-686.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tilby MJ, Styles JM, and Dean CJ (1987) Immunological detection of DNA damage caused by melphalan using monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res 47: 1542-1546.
Tokuda K and Bodell WJ (1987) Cytotoxicity and sister chromatid exchanges in 9L cells treated with monofunctional and bifunctional mustards. Carcinogenesis 8: 1697-1701.
Unsal-Kacmaz K, Makhov AM, Griffith JD, and Sancar A (2002) Preferential binding of ATR protein to UV-damaged DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 6673-6678.
Villunger A, Michalak EM, Coultas L, Müllauer F, Böck G, Ausserlechner MJ, Adams JM, and Strasser A (2003) p53- and drug-induced apoptotic responses mediated by BH3-only proteins Puma and Noxa. Science (Wash DC) 302: 1036-1038.
Wieler S, Gagne JP, Vaziri H, Poirier GG, and Benchimol S (2003) Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 is a positive regulator of the p53-mediated G1 arrest response following ionizing radiation. J Biol Chem 278: 18914-18921.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. K. Augustine, Y. Yoshimoto, M. Gupta, P. A. Zipfel, M. A. Selim, P. Febbo, A. M. Pendergast, W. P. Peters, and D. S. Tyler Targeting N-Cadherin Enhances Antitumor Activity of Cytotoxic Therapies in Melanoma Treatment Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3777 - 3784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Muret, M. Yacoub, P. Terrier, F. Drusch, A. Laplanche, C. Gaudin, C. Richon, C. Le Pechoux, A. Le Cesne, F. J. Lejeune, et al. p53 status correlates with histopathological response in patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated using isolated limb perfusion with TNF-{alpha} and melphalan Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 793 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. H. Clingen, I. U. De Silva, P. J. McHugh, F. J Ghadessy, M. J. Tilby, D. E. Thurston, and J. A. Hartley The XPF-ERCC1 endonuclease and homologous recombination contribute to the repair of minor groove DNA interstrand crosslinks in mammalian cells produced by the pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]benzodiazepine dimer SJG-136 Nucleic Acids Res., June 8, 2005; 33(10): 3283 - 3291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
) or monohydroxymelphalan (o). DNA adducts were assayed by competitive ELISA using antibody MP5/73. Typical data from one of three separate experiments are shown. Each point represents the mean of three replicate ELISA determinations. Error bars represent S.E.M. where this is greater than the symbol.
) or 4 Gy (
) or 20 (
) or 10 (o) µg/ml. Adduct levels were determined by competitive ELISA using monoclonal antibody MP5/73. Each point represents the mean (± S.E.) of three separate experiments, in each of which the ELISA assays were performed in triplicate.
) or monohydroxymelphalan (
0.05).
, 50 µg/ml melphalan;