QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.105.012070v1 68/4/1079    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xie, Z. Articles by Portoghese, P. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xie, Z. Articles by Portoghese, P. S.

Interaction of Bivalent Ligand KDN21 with Heterodimeric - Opioid Receptors in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells

Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Received February 22, 2005; accepted June 20, 2005

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion and Conclusion References

 
KDN21 is a bivalent ligand that contains and opioid antagonist pharmacophores linked through a 21-atom spacer. It has been reported that KDN21 bridges and receptors that are organized as heterodimers. We have shown previously that when using [³H]diprenorphine as radioligand, KDN21 displayed greatly enhanced affinity in this series for coexpressed and opioid receptors (CDK). The present study used in vitro expression systems to investigate interactions of members of the KDN series with - heterodimers through competition binding using selective ligands and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) assay. In this regard, the use of the selective radioligands [³H]naltrindole and [³H]norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI) in competition binding studies revealed that KDN21 has much higher affinity than other KDN members for CDK and bound to CDK more selectively relative to mixed and opioid receptors or singly expressed and opioid receptors. Other experiments revealed that the binding of naltrindole to opioid receptors could increase the binding of nor-BNI to opioid receptors and vice versa, suggesting reciprocal allosteric modulation of receptors in the heterodimer. Regarding the selectivity of KDN21 for phenotypic and opioid receptors, we investigated the effect of KDN21 on the activation of MAPKs [extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2)] by - or -selective agonists. KDN21 inhibited the activation of ERK1/2 by [D-Pen²,D-Pen⁵]-enkephalin (₁) and bremazocine (₂) but had no effect on the activation by deltorphin II (₂) and (+)-(5,7,8)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]benzeneacetamide (U69593 [GenBank] , ₁). 7-Benzylidenenaltrexone (₁) and bremazocine (₂) significantly reduced the binding of KDN21 to CDK, whereas naltriben (₂) and U69593 [GenBank] produced no such change. Taken together, these data support the idea that the organization of and receptors as heterodimers gives rise to ₁ and ₂ phenotypes.

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Stucture of the bivalent ligand KDN21. KDN21 is composed of a antagonist pharmacophore, naltrindole (Bhushan et al., 2004), and a antagonist pharmacophore, guanidinonaltrindole (Bhushan et al., 2004), linked through a spacer of 21 atoms. The spacer is composed of oligoglycyl units attached to a succinyl core.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion and Conclusion References

 
Materials. Cell culture and transfection reagents, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum, G418 (geneticin), hygromycin, streptomycin, penicillin, trypsin/EDTA, and Lipofectin Reagent were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). [³H]Diprenorphine (50 Ci/mmol) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA). [³H]Naltrindole (35 Ci/mmol) and [³H]nor-BNI (9.08 Ci/mmol) were supplied by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). U69593 [GenBank] , naloxone, and protease inhibitor cocktail were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Acrylamide stock (40%) (29:1) was obtained from Fisher Scientific Co. (Hampton, NH). Econo-Safe scintillation cocktail was from Research Products International Corporation (Mount Prospect, IL). Modified Lowry Protein Assay Reagent Kit was purchased from Pierce Chemical (Rockford, IL). Anti-active MAPK pAb and donkey anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Promega (Madison WI). Full Range Rainbow marker and enhanced cyan fluorescent substrate for Western blotting were purchased from GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). BNTX; NTB; bivalent ligands KDN15, -20, -21, -22, -23, and -24; and monovalent controls DN21 and KN21 were synthesized in our laboratory. Plasmid cDNAs of and opioid receptors were kindly provided by Carl Rios and Dr. Lakshmi Devi of New York University (New York, NY). Bremazocine and stable DOR HEK293 cell line were gifts from Dr. Ping Law (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN). Stable KOR HEK293 cell line was kindly provided by Lee-Yuan Liu-Chen (Temple University, Philadelphia, PA).

Cell Culture and Stable Expression of the Receptors in HEK293 Cells. cDNAs encoding rat and mouse opioid receptors were inserted separately into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3. The receptors were tagged with different epitopes, respectively: a 10-residue c-Myc epitope (EQKLISEEDL) for the opioid receptors and an 8-residue Flag epitope (DYKDDDDK) for the opioid receptors. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 unit/ml penicillin under humidified atmosphere in a 10% CO₂ incubator at 37°C. The cells, grown to approximately 50% confluence, were transfected with the expression vectors containing or opioid receptor cDNA. Transfections were done in serum-free medium using Lipofectin transfection kit according to the supplier's manual (Invitrogen). We used 10 µg of cDNA to transfect the cells of each 100-mm plate. For coexpression, the cells were first transfected with the pcDNA3 vector of opioid receptor and then with that of opioid receptor. The cells were incubated in transfection medium for 24 h and then changed to be incubated in complete DMEM for another 24 h. The cells were split and transferred into selective medium for culture until the appearance of stable cell colony. The expression level of the receptors was represented by their maximum binding to indicated radioligand (B_max). The B_max values of the singly expressed DOR and KOR in this study were 1091.5 and 1212.6 fmol/mg protein separately, and the DOR and KOR cells were mixed at 1:1 ratio of B_max for control MDK. The cells coexpressing and opioid receptors close to a ratio of 1:1 (B_max values of and opioid receptors are 854.2 and 879.3 fmol/mg protein, respectively) were chosen for experimental purposes.

Determination of Protein Concentration and Receptor Ratio. The modified Lowry protein assay was used to determine protein concentration of our samples using bovine serum albumin for establishing a standard curve of absorbance versus micrograms of protein. The sample was determined in triplicate, and the average absorbance value was used to determine the protein concentration of the same sample by comparison with the standard. We used 5 nM [³H]diprenorphine and [³H]naltrindole as tools to determine the ratio of and opioid receptors. Saturation binding assay was used to determine the maximal binding of [³H]diprenorphine and [³H]naltrindole (B_max) to the cells coexpressing and opioid receptors. The B_max values are expressed as femtomoles per milligrams of protein. The B_max of [³H]diprenorphine was the total binding to and opioid receptors, and B_max of [³H]naltrindole represented the binding to opioid receptors. The difference between the B_max of [³H]diprenorphine and the B_max of [³H]naltrindole represented the binding to opioid receptors.

Radioligand Binding Assay. Cells were grown to approximately 90% confluence in 100-mm dishes, collected using ice-cold trypsin/EDTA, and centrifuged at 1000g for 5 min. The cell pellets were rinsed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and centrifuged at 1000g for 5 min again. The cells were resuspended in binding buffer (25 mM HEPES, 120 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM CaCl₂, 5 mM KCl, and 1.5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4). Saturation binding was conducted on intact whole cells using radioligands to determine receptor density (B_max) and binding affinity (K_d) of the ligand. The cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of a radioligand at 25°C for 2 h in a total volume of 500-µl reaction system. Each concentration was performed in duplicate, and nonspecific binding was defined as the binding of the radioligand not displaced by 10 µM naloxone. The IC₅₀ values for tested compounds were determined by competition binding assay in which whole cells were incubated at 25°C for 2 h with an indicated radioligand and nine different concentrations (10^-14 to 10^-6 M) of the compounds in a final volume of 500 µl. The concentration of the radioligand used in the competition assay was approximately equivalent to its K_d value, and nonspecific binding was determined as in the presence of 10 µM naloxone. The experiments were repeated three times in duplicate for each assay. Bound radioligand was separated from the free by rapid filtration through Brandel 48-well harvester using Whatman GF/C glass fiber filter paper (Whatman, Clifton, NJ), presoaked in a 0.25% solution of polyethyleneimine in water. The filters with trapped cells were rinsed three times with 4.0 ml of 25 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, precooled to 4°C and placed in scintillation vials with 4.0 ml of Econo-Safe scintillation cocktail and counted in an liquid scintillation counter (LS3801; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) for 1 min/sample.

MAPK Activity Assay. Cells were grown to approximately 90% confluence in 100-mm dishes, incubated for 6 h, and then incubated with the compounds at 25°C for 10 min. The use of serum-free medium has been shown to reduce the basal level of MAPK activation by inhibiting enzyme phosphorylation (Polakiewicz et al., 1998). Cells were collected using ice-cold trypsin/EDTA and centrifuged at 1000g for 5 min. The cell pellets were rinsed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and centrifuged at 1000g for 5 min again. Cell lysates were prepared by the addition of appropriate volume of ice-cold cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, and 1 mM CaCl₂, pH 7.4) containing 1x protease inhibitor cocktail. The lysates were centrifuged in a microfuge at 12,000g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were analyzed for protein concentration using the Modified Lowry Protein Assay and then were prepared for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis by boiling them in the sample buffer (125 mM Tris, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.05% bromphenol blue, pH 6.8). Proteins (10 mg/lane) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10% acrylamide running gel and 4% acrylamide stacking gel) and electroblotted onto PVDF membrane (0.45 µm). The PVDF membrane was rinsed three times with TTBS (25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.6) and blocked overnight (12 h) at 4°C in TTBS with 5% nonfat dry milk. Then the PVDF membrane was incubated at 25°C for 2 h with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against phosphorylated MAPK (1:5000 dilution in blocking solution), and after being washed five times for 5 min each time, they were incubated at 25°C for 1 h with donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibodies conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (1:5000). Immunoreacted proteins were visualized using an alkaline phosphatase-sensitive enhanced cyan fluorescent substrate at 25°C for 10 min.

Data Analysis and Statistical Methods. Saturation and competition radioligand binding curves were generated through KaleidaGraph 3.1 (Synergy Software, Reading, PA). The B_max and K_d values of the radioligand were determined by Scatchard plotting analysis, in which the x-axis is specific binding and the y-axis is specific binding divided by free radioligand concentration. IC₅₀ values were determined from displacement curves using KaleidaGraph 3.1, and the K_i values were calculated according to the Cheng-Prusoff equation K_i = IC₅₀/1 + [L]/K_d (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973). Images of immunoreactive bands were captured on a Storm PhosphorImager system from GE Healthcare, and the activity of the MAPKs was represented by the gray values of the protein bands on the PVDF membrane. NIH Image software version 1.61 was used to quantify the phosphorylated MAPKs. Statistical data are expressed as mean ± S.E. of the indicated number of observations. Student's t test was used to compare the difference between the samples for significance tests.

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion and Conclusion References

 
Binding of KDN Bivalent Ligands to Coexpressed and Opioid Receptors in HEK293 Cells. In a previous report, we evaluated the KDN series of bivalent ligands using in vitro expression systems. We found that KDN21 possessed the greatest affinity for coexpressed and opioid receptors when [³H]diprenorphine was used as radioligand (Bhushan et al., 2004). However, because [³H]diprenorphine is a non-selective ligand, we were not able to obtain the information on the binding of KDN21 to individual receptors in the heterodimer. In this study, we used the -selective antagonist [³H]natrindole (0.1 nM) and the -selective antagonist [³H]nor-BNI (2.0 nM) as radioligands to further evaluate the binding of KDN series members to CDK, MDK, DOR, and KOR in HEK293 cells. It is noteworthy that the binding of [³H]naltrindole and [³H]nor-BNI to coexpressed and singly expressed receptors was similar. The greatly reduced affinity reported (Jordan and Devi, 1999) for the binding of selective ligands to - heterodimers may have been caused by the use of the nonselective radioligand [³H]diprenorphine. As shown in Table 1, when using [³H]natrindole as a label, KDN21 had greater binding affinity for CDK than other KDN members, and relative to MDK and DOR, their K_i values differed by more than 1 order of magnitude. KDN21 also bound more avidly to CDK than did other members and relative to MDK and KOR when [³H]nor-BNI was used as a label. Other bivalent ligands in this series had similar binding affinity for CDK, MDK, DOR, or KOR. The monovalent antagonist DN21 and monovalent antagonist KN21 exhibited poor ability to displace the binding of [³H]nor-BNI and [³H]natrindole, respectively.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1 Binding (Ki) of KDN bivalent ligands and monovalent controls to coexpressed and singly expressed and opioid receptors Competition binding assay was conducted on intact whole cells using 0.1 nM [3H]natrindole or 2.0 nM [3H]nor-BNI as radioligand. Each assay was performed in duplicate, and the data shown here are representative of at least three independent experiments (means ± S.E.).

Binding of Naltrindole and nor-BNI to Coexpressed and Opioid Receptors in HEK293 Cells. Although growing evidence has supported the dimerization/oligomerization of coexpressed opioid receptors, little is known about the roles that dimerization/oligomerization play in the regulation of opioid receptors. We have used the -selective antagonist [³H]naltrindole and -selective antagonist [³H]nor-BNI to evaluate allosteric effect on the binding of these radioligands to HEK293 cells containing coexpressed and opioid receptors. We first evaluated their direct binding to CDK. Both [³H]naltrindole and [³H]nor-BNI showed good affinity for that (Fig. 2, A and B). Their K_d values were 0.1 ± 0.04 and 2.0 ± 0.88 nM, respectively, which were very close to their K_d values for singly expressed or opioid receptors DOR or KOR (K_d value of [³H]naltrindole for DOR was 0.13 ± 0.05 nM; the K_d value of [³H]nor-BNI for KOR was 1.56 ± 0.72 nM). This suggested that the dimerized and opioid receptors retained binding to their own selective ligands. To evaluate possible allosteric interaction between and opioid receptors, we have further investigated the effects of nor-BNI (10 nM) on the binding of [³H]naltrindole and naltrindole (10 nM) on the binding of [³H]nor-BNI to the coexpressed and mixed and opioid receptors (CDK and MDK) in HEK293 cells. In CDK cells, naltrindole was found to increase the binding affinity of [³H]nor-BNI by 36-fold (Fig. 2A); similarly, nor-BNI increased the binding affinity of [³H]naltrindole by 27-fold (Fig. 2B). It is significant that, in MDK cells, no such facilitation change occurred (Fig. 2, C and D).

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Binding of naltrindole and nor-BNI to and opioid receptors coexpressed in HEK293 cells. The binding assay was conducted on intact whole cells using [3H]nor-BNI and [3H]naltrindole as radioligand. Each assay was performed in duplicate, and the data shown are representative of three independent experiments (means ± S.E.). The concentration of cold naltrindole and cold nor-BNI was 10 nM. The cold naltrindole facilitated the binding of [3H]nor-BNI to opioid receptors in CDK (A). The binding affinity of [3H]nor-BNI in the presence of naltrindole () increases significantly relative to its affinity in the absence of naltrindole (). Likewise, the cold nor-BNI facilitates the binding of [3H] naltrindole to opioid receptors in CDK (B). The binding affinity of [3H]naltrindole in the presence of nor-BNI () increases significantly relative to its affinity in the absence of nor-BNI (). In MDK cells, no such facilitation change occurred (C and D).

Effects of - and -Selective Ligands on the Binding of KDN21 to Coexpressed and Opioid Receptors in HEK293 Cells. From the above binding data and our previous studies (Bhushan et al., 2004), in the KDN series, KDN21 is an optimal candidate to bridge and opioid receptors in vivo and in vitro. In CDK cells, we have found that ₁, ₂, ₁, and ₂ pharmacological phenotypes coexist on the basis of the activation of ERK1/2 of MAPKs by different selective agonists (Table 2). To determine the selectivity of KDN 21 for such phenotypic receptors, we used selective and opioid ligands as tools to evaluate their effects on the binding of KDN21 to CDK. When using 0.1 nM [³H]naltrindole as a radioligand in the presence of ₂ agonist bremazocine (100 nM), the binding curve of KDN21 to CDK was shifted to the right (Fig. 3A), and its K_i value increased 25-fold compared with that in the absence of bremazocine, whereas ₁ agonist U69593 [GenBank] (100 nM) had little influence. When using 2 nM [³H]nor-BNI in the presence of ₁ antagonist BNTX (100 nM), the binding curve of KDN21 to CDK was also shifted to the right (Fig. 3B). Its K_i value was 18-fold higher than that in the absence of BNTX. The ₂ antagonist NTB (100 nM) had little influence in this case. In both cases, the binding of KDN21 to MDK was not changed by - or -selective ligand (Fig. 3, C and D). BNTX and bremazocine inhibited the binding of KDN21 to CDK cells, but NTB and U69593 [GenBank] did not, which suggests that the bridged receptors are ₁ and ₂ phenotypic receptors and provides additional support to our reported intrathecal studies (Bhushan et al., 2004), which revealed that KDN21 selectively antagonized the antinociception induced by administration of DPDPE and bremazocine.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2 Effect of KDN21 on the activation of ERK1/2 induced by and selective agonists HEK293 cells coexpressing and opioid receptors were grown to approximately 95% confluence and exposed to serum-free media for 6 h before the addition of the indicated opioid agonist and then incubated with 100 nM DPDPE, deltorphin II, U69593 [GenBank] , or bremazocine in the presence or absence of KDN21 (100 nM) at 37°C for 10 min. The cells were extensively washed and prepared for MAPK extraction as described under Materials and Methods. Protein (10 µg) was separated via SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting using the antibody raised against phosphorylated MAPK. NIH Image software, ver. 1.61, was used to quantify phosphorylated MAPK level. The level of phosphorylated MAPK in the absence of ligand treatment is taken as control and defined as 100%. The data are means ± S.E. of three independent experiments.

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Effects of - and -selective ligands on the binding of KDN21 to the CDK. The binding assay was conducted on intact whole cells using [3H]naltrindole or [3H]nor-BNI as radioligand. Each assay was performed in duplicate, and the data shown here are representative of three independent experiments (means ± S.E.). The concentrations of [3H]naltrindole and [3H]nor-BNI were 0.1 and 2.0 nM, respectively, and the concentration of U69593 [GenBank] , bremazocine, BNTX, and NTB was 100 nM. When using [3H]naltrindole as a label, bremazocine significantly decreased the binding affinity of KDN21 for CDK, but U695593 showed little influence (A); when [3H]nor-BNI was used as a label, BNTX significantly inhibited the biding of KDN21 to CDK, but NTB showed no such inhibition (B). In the both cases, the binding of KDN21 to MDK were not changed by - or -selective ligand (C and D).

Effect of KDN 21 on Phosphorylation of MAPKs Activated by - or -Selective Agonists. Many GPCRs, including all three opioid receptors µ, , and , have been reported to activate the MAPKs signaling cascade (Fukuda et al., 1996; Li and Chang, 1996). MAPK activation by GPCRs allows for plasma membrane receptor systems to influence diverse cellular processes, ranging from the regulation of neuronal survival to cell differentiation and gene expression (Gutkind, 1998). Our binding data and intrathecal studies have indicated that KDN21 selectively targets the ₁ and ₂ phenotypic opioid receptors. To obtain direct evidence that KDN21 regulates the function of ₁ and ₂ opioid phenotypes, we used different - and -selective agonists to activate the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and then observed the antagonism of KDN21 upon such activation. In CDK cells, DPDPE, deltorphin II, U69593 [GenBank] , and bremazocine could stimulate the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Table 2). Compared with the control, they could raise the phosphorylation level of ERK1/2 2- to 3-fold. 100 nM KDN21 could inhibit the activation of ERK1/2 induced by 100 nM DPDPE or 100 nM bremazocine, and the magnitude of inhibition was approximately 2.3-fold (p < 0.01). However, no significant inhibition on the activation induced by 100 nM deltorphin II and 100 nM U69593 [GenBank] was observed. These results give direct evidence for the regulation of KDN21 on the function of ₁ and ₂ opioid phenotypes.

	Discussion and Conclusion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion and Conclusion References

 
An important issue in opioid research concerns the greater number of putative receptor subtypes than those revealed through cloning. Several reports implicating the existence of - heterodimeric opioid receptors in vitro and in vivo and have suggested that the putative ₁ and ₂ opioid receptor subtypes are, in fact, phenotypes (Portoghese and Lunzer, 2003; Bhushan et al., 2004). - Opioid receptor heterodimers seemed to display molecular recognition properties that differ from those of their homomeric counterparts (Jordan and Devi, 1999; Bhushan et al., 2004; Daniels et al., 2005). Most recently, this difference has raised the possibility of developing ligands that activate - heterodimers.

In the present study, we used a bivalent ligand, KDN21, that contains and antagonist pharmacophores linked through a 21-atom spacer as a tool to investigate the properties of heterodimers of and opioid receptors in HEK293 cells. In this regard, KDN21 has been reported to have a spacer of optimal distance for bridging and opioid receptors organized as heterodimers (Bhushan et al., 2004). Although KDN21 possessed the highest affinity for coexpressed and opioid receptors in HEK293 cells and its in vivo pharmacological selectivity corresponded to the ₁ and ₂ phenotypes, the phenotypic receptors were not identified in binding studies because nonselective [³H]diprenorphine was used as a radioligand. Therefore, in this study, we used selective radioligands to investigate the binding selectivity. With the antagonist [³H]naltrindole or the antagonist [³H]nor-BNI, coexpressed and opioid receptors retained good binding selectivity for these selective ligands (Table 1). Using either radioligand, KDN21 showed much higher binding affinity than other members of the series for HEK293 cells coexpressed with both and receptors (CDK). This provides more direct evidence for the optimal bridging of and opioid receptors by KDN21.

Pharmacological studies have suggested cooperative interaction between and opioid receptors, and allosteric coupling has been proposed on the basis of the finding that the -selective antagonist nor-BNI antagonizes the ₁ agonist DPDPE in the spinal cord (Portoghese and Lunzer, 2003). A similar type of antagonism has been reported in the porcine ileum preparation (Poonyachoti et al., 2001). In the both cases, the presence of and receptors in the same cell has provided support for antagonism being mediated via allosteric heterodimers rather than through cellular circuitry. In the present study, the enhanced affinity of [³H]naltrindole in the presence of nor-BNI suggests that the and opioid receptors organized as heterodimers function cooperatively (Fig. 2A). That this was a reciprocal effect was demonstrated by the increased affinity of [³H]nor-BNI in the presence of naltrindole (Fig. 2B). These results provide more direct evidence that and k opioid receptors function cooperatively as heterodimers. According to the conceptual model illustrated in Fig. 4, - opioid receptor heterodimers exist either in the agonist or antagonist state, but not in the mixed state. Interaction of a selective antagonist will therefore transform both and receptor subunits to the antagonist state. Thus, a antagonist can antagonize a agonist and a antagonist can antagonize a agonist, both allosterically. The allosteric nature of such coupling has far-reaching implications because antagonism of an agonist by a selective antagonist does not necessarily reveal the receptor that mediates the agonist effect. Given the above results, it seems likely that and opioid receptor subunits in the heterodimer also facilitate the binding of KDN21 when the spacer permits optimal bridging of the pharmacophores. The binding data for the KDN series (Table 1) are consistent with this view if it is assumed that bridging of KDN21 to the opioid-recognition sites on the heterodimer occurs in discrete steps involving univalent binding followed by the binding of the second pharmacophore (Fig. 5). KDN21 most likely possesses greatly increased affinity relative to other bivalent and monovalent ligands in the series through a combination of positive allosterism and high local concentration of one of the free pharmacophores in the vicinity of the vacant neighboring receptor in the heterodimer. The lower affinity of KDN21, in the presence of ₂-selective agonist bremazocine or ₁-selective antagonist BNTX (Fig. 3), is possibly attributable to the competition of them with KDN21 for one of the two binding sites in the heterodimer. Such competition could change the binding of KDN21 from a bivalent state to a univalent state and therefore lead to a lower affinity of KDN21.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. A conceptional model of the antagonism of a 1 or a 2 agonist by a or a 1 antagonist at a - opioid receptor heterodimer. The change from an agonist state (a) to an antagonist state (b) by the binding of a 1 (A) or a 2 selective antagonist (B) is accompanied by a conformational change that reduces the affinity of the bound 2 or 1 agonist.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. A conceptual model of the interaction of KDN21 with a - opioid receptor heterodimer. The - opioid receptor heterodimer (a) is bound univalently by KDN21 (b). This is accompanied by a conformational change of both receptor subunits that facilitates binding of the second pharmacophore (c). Increased binding of KDN21 to - opioid receptor heterodimer is also probably caused by the proximity of the unbound pharmacophore to the vacant receptor (b). This model assumes that both subunits are either in the agonist state (a) or antagonist state (b and c).

Intrathecal studies in mice have revealed that KDN21 displays ₁ and ₂ selectivity. This was derived from the antagonism of the ₁ agonist DPDPE and the ₂ agonist bremazocine. In this regard, the ₂ agonist deltorphin II and the ₁ agonist U69593 [GenBank] were only weakly antagonized by KDN21. When taken together with the reports that nor-BNI antagonizes both DPDPE and bremazocine, we concluded that KDN21 interacts selectively with allosteric heterodimeric - opioid receptors whose phenotypes correspond to ₁ and ₂, respectively. To determine whether KDN21 effects the same phenotypic opioid receptors in CDK HEK293 cells, we investigated the antagonism of selective agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of MAPKs (ERK1/2). It is significant that similar antagonist selectivity was observed, in that KDN21 antagonized ₁-and ₂-selective agonists in both HEK293 cells and in mice upon intrathecal administration. No significant antagonism of the ₂ and ₁ agonists was observed. These results have provided support for the existence ₁ and ₂ phenotypic opioid receptors in HEK293 cells. Moreover, the qualitatively similar antagonist selectivity of KDN21 in CDK HEK293 cells lends additional support to the study that KDN21 selectively interacts with - opioid receptor heterodimers in the mouse spinal cord.

In conclusion, our studies with the bivalent ligand KDN21 provide new insights into the interaction of ligands with - opioid receptor heterodimers that recognize ₁- and ₂-selective ligands. These phenotypic receptors are allosterically coupled and recognize agonists such as DPDPE and bremazocine. The cooperative nature of these heterodimers is manifested by the reported antagonism of a ₁ agonist (DPDPE) by a antagonist (nor-BNI) or the antagonism of a ₂ agonist (bremazocine) by a ₁ antagonist (BNTX). In view of these findings, the assignment of a receptor type on the basis of the selectivity of a standard selective opioid antagonist can be problematic. Finally, KDN21 should be a useful tool for identifying - opioid receptor heterodimers both in vitro and in vivo.

	Acknowledgements

 
We thank Dr. L.-Y. Liu-Chen of Temple University for stable KOR HEK293 cell line, Dr. P. Law of the University of Minnesota for stable DOR HEK293 cell line, and Drs. L. Devi and C. Rios of New York University for plasmid cDNAs of DOR and KOR. The capable technical assistance of Mary Lunzer and Michael Power is greatly appreciated.

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse grants DA01533 and DA015091.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.105.012070.

ABBREVIATIONS: GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptors; CDK, coexpressed - opioid receptors; MDK, mixed and opioid receptors which are singly expressed; DOR, opioid receptor; KOR, opioid receptor; TTBS, Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; HEK, human embryonic kidney; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; KDN#, - opioid antagonist bivalent ligand (K, pharmacophore; D, pharmacophore; N, antagonist; #, number of atoms in the spacer); BNTX, 7-benzylidenenaltrexone; nor-BNI, norbinaltorphimine; ERK1/2, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; U69593 [GenBank] , (+)-(5,7,8)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]benzeneacetamide; DPDPE, [D-Pen²,D-Pen⁵]-enkephalin; NTB, naltribene.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Philip S. Portoghese, 308 Harvard Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: porto001{at}maroon.tc.umn.edu

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion and Conclusion References

 
Bhushan RG, Sharma SK, Xie Z, Daniels DJ, and Portoghese PS (2004) A bivalent ligand (KDN-21) reveals spinal and opioid receptors are organized as heterodimers that give rise to 1 and 2 phenotypes. Selective targeting of - heterodimers. J Med Chem 47: 2969-2972.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cheng YC and Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzyme reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22: 3099-3108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Daniels DJ, Kulkarni A, Xie Z, Bhushan RG, and Portoghese PS (2005) A bivalent ligand (KDAN-18) containing antagonist and agonist pharmacophores bridges 2 and 1 opioid receptor phenotypes. J Med Chem 48: 1713-1716.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dean MK, Higgs C, Smith RE, Bywater RP, Snell CR, Scott PD, Upton GJ, Howe TJ, and Reynolds CA (2001) Dimerization of G-protein coupled receptors. J Med Chem 44: 4595-4614.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dhawan BN, Cesselin F, Raghubir R, Reisine T, Bradley PB, Portoghese PS, and Hamon M (1996) International Union of Pharmacology. XII. Classification of opioid receptors. Pharmacol Rev 48: 567-592.[Medline]

Erez M, Takemori AE, and Portoghese PS (1982) Narcotic antagonistic potency of bivalent ligands which contain -naltrexamine. Evidence for bridging between proximal recognition sites. J Med Chem 25: 847-849.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fukuda K, Kato S, Morikawa H, Shoda T, and Mori K (1996) Functional coupling of the , µ- and opioid receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinase and arachidonate release in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Neurochem 67: 1309-1316.[Medline]

Garzon J, Juarros JL, Castro MA, and Sanchez-Blazquez P (1995) Antibodies to the cloned µ-opioid receptor detect various molecular weight forms in areas of mouse brain. Mol Pharmacol 47: 738-744.[Abstract]

George SR, Fan T, Xie Z, Tse R, Tam V, Varghese G, and O'Dowd BF (2000) Oligomerization of µ and opioid receptors: generation of novel functional properties. J Biol Chem 275: 26128-26135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gomes I, Jordan BA, Gupta A, Trapaidze N, Nagy V, and Devi LA (2000) Heterodimerization of µ and opioid receptors: a role in opiate synergy. J Neurosci 20: RC110.

Gutkind JS (1998) The pathway connecting G-protein-coupled receptors to the nucleus through divergent mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. J Biol Chem 273: 1839-1842.[Free Full Text]

Jordan BA and Devi LA (1999) G-protein-coupled receptor heterodimerization modulates receptor function. Nature (Lond) 399: 697-700.[CrossRef][Medline]

Knapp RJ, Malatynska E, Collins N, Fang L, Wang JY, Hruby VJ, Roeske WR, and Yamamura HI (1995) Molecular biology and pharmacology of cloned opioid receptors. FASEB J 9: 516-525.[Abstract]

Li LY and Chang KJ (1996) The stimulatory effect of opioids on mitogen-activated protein kinase in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected to express µ opioid receptors. Mol Pharmacol 50: 599-602.[Abstract]

McLachie LM, Fraser NJ, Main MJ, Wise A, Brown J, Thompson N, Solari R, Lee MG, and Ford SM (1998) RAMPs regulate the transport and ligand specificity of the calcitonin-receptor-like receptor. Nature (Lond) 393: 333-339.[CrossRef][Medline]

Polakiewicz RD, Schieferl SM, Dorner LF, Kansra V, and Comb MJ (1998) A mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is required for µ opioid receptor desensitization. J Bio Chem 273: 12402-12406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Poonyachoti S, Portoghese PS, and Brown DR (2001) Characterization of opioid receptors modulating neurogenic contractions of circular muscle from porcine ileum and evidence that - and -opioid receptors are coexpressed in myenteric neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 297: 69-77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Porreca F, Takemori AE, Sultana M, Portoghese PS, Bowen WD, and Mosberg HI (1992) Modulation of µ-mediated antinociception in the mouse involves opioid delta-2 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263: 147-152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Portoghese PS, Larson DL, Sayre LM, Yim CB, Ronsisvalle G, Tam SW, and Takemori AE (1986) Opioid agonist and antagonist bivalent ligands. The relationship between spacer length and selectivity at multiple opioid receptors. J Med Chem 29: 1855-1861.[CrossRef][Medline]

Portoghese PS and Lunzer MM (2003) Identity of the putative 1 opioid receptor as a - heteromer in the mouse spinal cord. Eur J Pharmacol 467: 233-234.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ramsay D, Kellett E, McVey M, Rees S, and Milligan G (2002) Homo- and heterooligomeric interactions between G-protein-coupled receptors in living cells monitored by two variants of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET): hetero-oligomers between receptor subtypes form more efficiently than between less closely related sequences. Biochem J 365: 429-440.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rothman RB and Westfall TC (1982) Allosteric coupling between morphine and enkephalin receptors in vitro. Mol Pharmacol 21: 548-557.[Abstract]

Salahpour A, Angers S, and Bouvier M (2000) Functional significance of oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab 11: 163-168.[CrossRef][Medline]

Traynor JR and Elliott J (1993) opioid receptor subtypes and cross-talk with µ receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 14: 84-86.[CrossRef][Medline]

Waldhoer M, Bartlett SE, and Whistler JL (2004) Opioid receptors. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 953-990.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wessendorf MW and Dooyema J (2001) Coexistence of and opioid receptors in rat spinal cord axons. Neurosci Lett 298: 151-154.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zawarynski P, Tallerico T, Seeman P, Lee SP, O'Dowd BF, and George SR (1998) Dopamine D2 receptor dimmers in human and rat brain. FEBS Lett 441: 383-386.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zeng FY and Wess J (1999) Identification and molecular characterization of m3-muscarinic receptor dimmers. J Biol Chem 274: 19487-19497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. Xie and G. M. Miller A Receptor Mechanism for Methamphetamine Action in Dopamine Transporter Regulation in Brain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2009; 330(1): 316 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Dietis, R. Guerrini, G. Calo, S. Salvadori, D. J. Rowbotham, and D. G. Lambert Simultaneous targeting of multiple opioid receptors: a strategy to improve side-effect profile Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2009; 103(1): 38 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Xie and G. M. Miller {beta}-Phenylethylamine Alters Monoamine Transporter Function via Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1: Implication for Modulatory Roles of Trace Amines in Brain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2008; 325(2): 617 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Xie, S. V. Westmoreland, and G. M. Miller Modulation of Monoamine Transporters by Common Biogenic Amines via Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 and Monoamine Autoreceptors in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells and Brain Synaptosomes J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2008; 325(2): 629 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Lunzer and P. S. Portoghese Selectivity of {delta}- and {kappa}-Opioid Ligands Depends on the Route of Central Administration in Mice J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 166 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Xie, S. V. Westmoreland, M. E. Bahn, G.-L. Chen, H. Yang, E. J. Vallender, W.-D. Yao, B. K. Madras, and G. M. Miller Rhesus Monkey Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 Signaling: Enhancement by Monoamine Transporters and Attenuation by the D2 Autoreceptor in Vitro J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2007; 321(1): 116 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Xie and G. M. Miller Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 Is a Modulator of the Dopamine Transporter J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2007; 321(1): 128 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-P. Pin, R. Neubig, M. Bouvier, L. Devi, M. Filizola, J. A. Javitch, M. J. Lohse, G. Milligan, K. Palczewski, M. Parmentier, et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXVII. Recommendations for the Recognition and Nomenclature of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Heteromultimers Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2007; 59(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. K. Madras, Z. Xie, Z. Lin, A. Jassen, H. Panas, L. Lynch, R. Johnson, E. Livni, T. J. Spencer, A. A. Bonab, et al. Modafinil Occupies Dopamine and Norepinephrine Transporters in Vivo and Modulates the Transporters and Trace Amine Activity in Vitro J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 561 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Daniels, N. R. Lenard, C. L. Etienne, P.-Y. Law, S. C. Roerig, and P. S. Portoghese Opioid-induced tolerance and dependence in mice is modulated by the distance between pharmacophores in a bivalent ligand series PNAS, December 27, 2005; 102(52): 19208 - 19213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.105.012070v1 68/4/1079    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xie, Z. Articles by Portoghese, P. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xie, Z. Articles by Portoghese, P. S.