MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on November 16, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.019620


0026-895X/06/6902-520-531$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 69:520-531, 2006

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.105.019620v1
69/2/520    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.

Positive Inter-Regulation between beta-Catenin/T Cell Factor-4 Signaling and Endothelin-1 Signaling Potentiates Proliferation and Survival of Prostate Cancer Cells

Ping Sun, Hui Xiong, Tae Hoon Kim, Bing Ren, and Zhuohua Zhang

Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, California (P.S., H.X., Z.Z.); and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California (T.H.K., B.R.)

Received October 5, 2005; accepted November 15, 2005


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Both malignant and normal prostate epithelial cells produce endothelin-1 (ET-1), a critical factor in prostate cancer (CaP) progression. beta-Catenin (beta-cat), a key component of the Wnt signaling pathway, is also implicated in CaP progression via beta-cat/T cell factor (Tcf) signaling. We recently demonstrated that beta-cat/Tcf-4 regulates transcription of ET-1 in colon cancer cells. In the present study, we found that Tcf-4 specifically bound to and activated the ET-1 promoter in vivo in human CaP cells and mouse prostate tissue. Expression of ET-1 in DU145 CaP cells was down-regulated by knocking down endogenous beta-cat or Tcf-4. Ectopic activation of beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling significantly elevated expression of ET-1 in LNCaP cells. In addition, genetic ablation of beta-cat significantly inhibited transcription of ET-1 in primary prostate epithelial cells. Meanwhile, exogenous ET-1 enhanced beta-cat/Tcf signaling and ET-1 expression in DU145 cells, which was blocked by both selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (LY294002) and endothelin-A receptor antagonist cyclo(L-Leu-D-Trp-D-Asp-L-Pro-D-Val) (BQ123). Furthermore, knockdown of either beta-cat or Tcf-4 substantially reduced cell proliferation and potentiated paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in DU145 cells, which largely were rescued by treatment with exogenous ET-1. Together, our results suggest that beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling transcriptionally activates ET-1 in CaP cells; meanwhile, ET-1 enhances beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and in turn further increases ET-1 expression in a PI3K-dependent manner. The positive inter-regulation between beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and ET-1 signaling potentiates proliferation and survival of CaP cells, thereby representing a novel mechanism that contributes to CaP progression.


Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Although our ability to detect early stage CaP has increased, predictive diagnosis and effective tumor therapy remain limited. Advanced CaP brought to remission with androgen ablative therapy often relapses, leading to hormone-refractory tumors for which only experimental treatments exist (Culig et al., 1998Go). Hence, understanding the molecular basis of CaP progression is paramount for broadening current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

beta-Catenin (beta-cat), originally identified as an essential regulator for E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell interaction, is also a key component of the Wnt signaling pathway (Zhang et al., 1998Go; Chesire and Isaacs, 2003Go). Wnt signals are transduced via specific cell surface receptors to activate a series of biochemical reactions involving a large protein complex consisting of beta-cat, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK-3beta), beta-transducin repeat-containing protein (beta-Trcp) and axin, resulting in stabilization of beta-cat protein and an increase in the soluble pool of beta-cat (Wodarz and Nusse, 1998Go; Nusse, 1999Go). The soluble beta-cat interacts with the T cell factor (Tcf) family of transcription factors and transactivates a number of downstream target genes, leading to increased proliferation and decreased differentiation of epithelial cells (Chesire et al., 2000Go; de la Taille et al., 2003Go). Pathological mutation of beta-cat, APC, beta-Trcp, axin, and Tcf all lead to activation of beta-cat/Tcf signaling and are found in a variety of cancers, including CaP (Barker and Clevers, 2000Go). In all, 5 to 7% of CaP carry mutations in beta-cat (Chesire et al., 2000Go). One study showed that 32% of CaP samples carried mutations in beta-cat signaling pathway components, including beta-cat, APC, or beta-Trcp (Gerstein et al., 2002Go). In cases of advanced CaP, nuclear localization of beta-cat is significantly increased despite the absence of detectable beta-cat mutations (Chesire et al., 2002Go). A recent study reported that high levels of expression of Wnt-1 and cytoplasmic/nuclear beta-cat were observed in situ in 77% of lymph node metastases and 85% of bone metastases of CaP (Chen et al., 2004Go). In addition, abnormal cytoplasmic/nuclear beta-cat expression is associated with high Gleason scores in CaP patients (de la Taille et al., 2003Go; Chen et al., 2004Go). These findings indicate that abnormal activation of beta-cat is associated with CaP progression, particularly the development of advanced, hormone-refractory CaP.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor initially isolated from endothelial cells (Nelson et al., 2003aGo). Both malignant and normal prostate epithelial cells (PrEC) produce ET-1 (Nelson et al., 1996Go; Pirtskhalaishvili and Nelson, 2000Go). Although its physiological function in the normal prostate remains unclear, ET-1 has been shown to promote CaP cell proliferation in vitro and CaP bone metastasis in vivo through the endothelin-A (ET-A) receptor (Nelson et al., 1996Go). Compelling evidence suggests that ET-1 plays an important role in CaP progression. ET-1 levels are evidently higher in advanced, metastatic CaP specimens than in primary lesions (Nelson et al., 1996Go). Expression of ET-1 in CaP cells is markedly up-regulated by factors involved in cancer progression (Granchi et al., 2001Go). Furthermore, plasma ET-1 levels are abnormally elevated in 58% of men with advanced, hormone-refractory CaP (Nelson et al., 2001Go). The importance of ET-1 in CaP progression is further emphasized by results of clinical trials, which indicate that a selective ET-A receptor antagonist is beneficial in controlling progression of hormone-refractory CaP and in suppressing CaP-induced bone remodeling (Fisher, 2002Go; Nelson et al., 2003bGo).

Multiple observations suggest that beta-cat/Tcf-related transcription (CRT) is correlated with expression of ET-1 in CaP cells. For instance, activation of androgen/androgen receptor (AR) signaling down-regulates both CRT activity and expression of ET-1 in CaP cells (Grant et al., 1997Go; Granchi et al., 2001Go; Chesire and Issacs, 2002Go; Mulholland et al., 2003Go). We have recently demonstrated that beta-cat/Tcf-4 regulates ET-1 transcription in colon cancer cells (Kim et al., 2005Go). In this study, we show that beta-cat/Tcf-4 transcriptionally activates ET-1 expression in both malignant and normal PrECs; meanwhile, ET-1 stimulates beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling via a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent pathway. Thus, beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and ET-1 signaling forms a positive feedback loop to enhance both signaling pathways and potentiate proliferation and survival of CaP cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Plasmids and Reagents. The TOPflash and FOPflash plasmids and plasmids encoding human beta-cat or Tcf-4 were kindly provided by Dr. Hans Clevers (Netherlands Institute for Developmental Biology, Utrecht, The Netherlands). To generate retroviral expression of beta-cat, human beta-cat cDNA was subcloned into retroviral vector pLX-SHD (Miller and Rosman, 1989Go). Human ET-1 promoter reporter (ETP) and its mutant control (muETP) were generated as described previously (Kim et al., 2005Go). To construct retroviral-RNA interference plasmids, gene-specific oligonucleotides (Table 1) were phosphorylated, annealed, and ligated into pRetro-Super vector (Brummelkamp et al., 2002Go) digested with BglII and HindIII. The Cre-expressing adenovirus was kindly provided by Dr. Gen-Sheng Feng (Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, CA). Dual-luciferase reporter assay system was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). TRIzol reagent for RNA isolation, the SYBR Green I kit, the Annexin V-EGFP apoptosis detection kit and the ET-1 ELISA kit were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA), Roche (Indianapolis, IN), BioVision (Mountain View, CA), and R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), respectively. Anti-Pan-cytokeratin antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-Tcf-4 antibody was from Upstate (Lake Placid, NY). Anti-GSK-3beta and Anti-phospho-GSK-3beta (serine 9) antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). All secondary antibodies were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). C57BL/6J mouse with floxed beta-cat alleles were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). LY294002, BQ123, synthetic ET-1, thiorphan, and anti-beta-cat antibody were purchased from Sigma.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Gene-specific oligonucleotides used to construct the retroviral-RNA interference vectors

 

Cell Lines and Mouse Primary PrEC Culture. DU145 and LNCaP cells were acquired from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Primary culture of mouse PrECs was prepared as described previously (Ravindranath and Dym, 1999Go; Sawicki and Rothman, 2000Go). In brief, pieces of prostate tissue dissected from 10-week-old male mice with floxed beta-cat alleles were incubated in DMEM/Ham's F-12 medium containing type I collagenase (1 mg/ml) at 37°C for 20 min on a rotator. The sediment was resuspended in DMEM/Ham's F-12 containing collagenase (1 mg/ml) and hyaluronidase (1 mg/ml) at 37°C for 30 min on a rotator. The cell aggregates were then cultured in DMEM/Ham's F-12 containing 10% FBS in 5% CO2 at 37°C overnight. On the following morning, floating epithelial clumps were collected and further digested with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA at 37°C for 10 min, followed by passage through a 40-µm cell strainer. Approximately 5 x 104 cells were inoculated to each well of a 24-well plate in 1 ml of DMEM/Ham's F-12, 4% FBS, 10 ng/ml cholera toxin, 1 µM dexamethasone, and ITS supplement (insulin/transferrin/sodium selenite). The cells were maintained in 5% CO2 at 37°C and used within 1 week.

Luciferase Assay. Cells were transfected with reporter plasmids combined with plasmids encoding beta-cat or Tcf-4 using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Plasmid PRL-CMV encoding Renilla reniformis luciferase (at one fifth molar ratio to test plasmids) was cotransfected with test plasmids in each transfection as an internal control for data normalization. The luciferase assays were performed 24 h after transfection with a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each experiment was repeated for three times in duplicates and results are shown as mean ± S.E..

Retroviral Infection. Retrovirus was produced by transfecting phoenix packaging cells with retrovirus-based plasmids. Tissue culture supernatants were collected 48 h after transfection and filtered through 0.45-µm filters. Infection was performed overnight with the retrovirus-containing media and polybrene (8 µg/ml). Pools of stable infectants were generated via selection with puromycin (5 µg/ml).

Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR. RNA were prepared using TRIzol reagent followed by purification with TURBO DNA-free System (Ambion, Austin, TX). The cDNAs were synthesized using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed on the LightCycler thermal cycler system (Roche Diagnostics) using SYBR Green I kit (Roche) as described by the manufacturer. The results were normalized against that of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the same sample. The primers used are as follows: for human ET-1, 5'-TCCTCTGCTGGTTCCTGACT-3' (forward) and 5'-CAGAAACTCCACCCCTGTGT-3' (reverse); for human cyclin D1, 5'-ACGCTTTGTCTGTCGTGATG-3' (forward) and 5'-AACCAGAAATGCACAGACCC-3' (reverse); for human GAPDH, 5'-GTCAGTGGTGGACCTGACCT-3' (forward) and 5'-TGCTGTAGCCAAATTCGTTG-3' (reverse); for mouse ET-1, 5'-TGGACATCATCTGGGTCAACA-3' (forward) and 5'-GACCTGGAAGAACCTCCCAATC-3' (reverse); for mouse cyclin D1, 5'-TACCGCACAACGCACTTTCT-3' (forward) and 5'-TCCACATCTCGCACGTCGGT-3' (reverse); for mouse GAPDH, 5'-TTCACCACCATGGAGAAGGC-3' (forward) and 5'-GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGA-3' (reverse). Each experiment was repeated for two times in triplicates and results are expressed as mean ± S.E.

Immunoassays. The secreted ET-1 levels in cell culture supernatants were determined using an ET-1 ELISA kit. In brief, cells were grown to confluence in 10-cm dishes in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, followed by replacing the medium with serum-free medium and further incubation for 16 h. The cell culture supernatants were collected for ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (R&D Systems). ELISA-detected ET-1 concentrations were normalized against cell number (per 106 cells). Each ELISA experiment was repeated for three times in duplicates and results are expressed as mean ± S.E. Immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry were performed as described previously with respective antibodies (Hanazono et al., 1998Go; Zhang et al., 1998Go). To prepare the soluble cell lysate fraction, DU145 cells were lysed in 0.1% Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (0.1% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 142.5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA). The lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatants were saved as soluble cell lysate. The pellets representing the insoluble fraction of cell lysates were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation. Tissue and cell ChIPs were performed as described previously (Sun and Loh, 2001Go, 2002Go) except that protein G Sepharose beads were used instead of Staph A cells for binding the immune complexes in these experiments. The primers used are as the following: for human ET-1 promoter (–290/–65 fragment) amplification, 5'-CAGCTTGCAAAGGGGAAGCG-3' (forward) and 5'-TCCGACTTTATTCCAGCCCC-3' (reverse); for mouse ET-1 promoter (–290/–65 fragment) amplification, 5'-CAGCTAGCAAAAGGGGAAGC-3' (forward) and 5'-TCTGACTTTATTCCAGCCCT-3' (reverse); for human/mouse GAPDH exon 8 amplification, 5'-ATCACTGCCACCCAGAAGACTGTGGA-3' (forward) and 5'-TCATACCAGGAAATGAGCTTGACAAA-3' (reverse).

[3H]Thymidine Incorporation Assay. Cells were seeded at 2 x 105 cells per well in a 24-well plate. The cells were placed in serum-free medium for 10 h followed by incubation in nucleotide-free medium containing 10% dialyzed FBS and 1 µCi/well [3H]thymidine (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) in the presence or absence of 5 pM synthetic ET-1 for 12 h. Quantitation was performed as described previously (Coward et al., 1998Go). Each experiment was repeated for three times in triplicates and results are expressed as mean ± S.E.

Apoptosis Analysis. Cells were seeded at 5 x 105 per well in six-well plates. After cells attached to the dishes (approximately 2 h after seeding), cells were treated with paclitaxel (5 nM) in the presence or absence of ET-1 (5 or 100 pM) for 12 h. Cell apoptosis was detected with an Annexin V-EGFP Apoptosis Detection kit (BioVision) coupled with flow cytometry analysis.

Statistical Analysis. Statistic tests were performed using analysis of variance followed by post hoc comparisons of means by the least-significance differences method. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05 ({alpha} = 0.05) for each analysis.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
beta-Cat/Tcf-4 Directly Activates the ET-1 Promoter in DU145 CaP Cells. The human ET-1 promoter contains multiple potential Tcf binding elements (TBE) (Kim et al., 2005Go). In this study, we identified a functional TBE located at –73 to –67 bp relative to the transcription initiation site (TIS, designated as +1) in the human ET-1 promoter in DU145 CaP cells (Fig. 1A). The ET-1 promoter sequence spanning from –1300 to +230 bp surrounding the TIS was inserted into a luciferase reporter plasmid to make an ET-1 promoter reporter. A mutated ET-1 promoter reporter was generated by deleting the functional TBE from the ET-1 promoter reporter (Fig. 1B). Deletion of the functional TBE (–73/–67) markedly decreased the ET-1 promoter activity and abolished the synergistic effect of beta-cat and Tcf-4 on transactivation of the ET-1 promoter (Fig. 1C). To verify that Tcf-4 binds to the ET-1 promoter in vivo, we performed ChIP assays. As shown in Fig. 1D, ET-1 promoter fragments containing the putative TBE (–73/–67) were specifically precipitated from cross-linked DU145 chromatin extracts with an anti-Tcf-4 antibody. In contrast, no detectable ET-1 promoter fragment was precipitated with an anti-tubulin antibody. Together, these results indicate that beta-cat/Tcf-4 specifically binds to and transactivates the ET-1 promoter in DU145 CaP cells.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. beta-Cat/Tcf-4 directly activates the ET-1 promoter in DU145 CaP cells. A, schematic representation of the human ET-1 promoter. The relative position of the TATA box, the functional TBE, and the TIS (designated as +1) are shown. The ET-1 promoter fragment amplified in ChIP is indicated (black bar). B, illustration of the ET-1 promoter reporter constructs. The human ET-1 promoter sequence spanning from –1362 to +230 bp surrounding the TIS was inserted into a luciferase (LUC) reporter plasmid to make the ETP reporter. A muETP reporter was generated by deleting the functional TBE from ETP. C, regulation of the ET-1 promoter activity in DU145 cells. ETP or muETP was cotransfected with plasmids encoding beta-cat or Tcf-4 into DU145 cells. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after transfection. Normalized luciferase activities are expressed as mean ± S.E. (*, P < 0.05 versus ETP). The empty expression vector (pcDNA3.1; Invitrogen) was added to make an equal amount of DNA for each transfection. D, binding of Tcf-4 to the ET-1 promoter in vivo. Cross-linked DU145 chromatin extracts were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Tcf-4 antibody ({alpha}-Tcf-4) or an anti-tubulin antibody ({alpha}-tubulin). The ET-1 promoter fragment covering –290 to –65 bp (ETP–260/–65) and a DNA fragment from exon 8 of human GAPDH gene were PCR-amplified from the immunoprecipitated and the input chromatin, respectively.

 
Knockdown of beta-Cat/Tcf-4 Signaling Inhibits Expression of ET-1 in DU145 Cells. To investigate the role of beta-cat/Tcf-4 in regulating ET-1 expression in CaP cells, DU145 cells stably expressing small interfering RNA (siRNA) against beta-cat or Tcf-4 were generated using a retroviral vector (Brummelkamp et al., 2002Go). Immunoblotting analysis revealed that more than 70% of endogenous beta-cat or the two isoforms of Tcf-4 present in DU145 cells (Chesire et al., 2002Go) were knocked down by expressing corresponding siRNA. In contrast, an siRNA with scrambled sequence showed no effect on expression of either beta-cat or Tcf-4 in DU145 cells (Fig. 2A). The transcriptional activity of beta-cat/Tcf-4 in the beta-cat- or Tcf-4-knockdown DU145 cells was also significantly reduced compared with that in the scrambled-siRNA-expressing cells, as measured by the luciferase activities of TOPflash, a synthetic beta-cat/Tcf-dependent luciferase reporter (Fig. 2B). In contrast, little change was observed with FOPflash, a negative control reporter with mutated TBEs. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays showed a 65% decrease at the ET-1 mRNA level (Fig. 2C), and ELISA assays detected a 55% reduction of secreted ET-1 in the beta-cat- or Tcf-4-knockdown DU145 cells compared with control cells expressing scrambled siRNA (Fig. 2D). As a positive control, the mRNA level of cyclin D1, an established downstream target of beta-cat/Tcf signaling in CaP cells (Chesire and Isaacs, 2002Go), was also significantly reduced by knockdown of beta-cat or Tcf-4 (Fig. 2C). In addition, overexpression of beta-cat significantly raised the TOPflash activity (Fig. 1E), the ET-1 and the cyclin D1 mRNA levels (Fig. 1F), and the secreted ET-1 level (Fig. 1G) in DU145 cells. Together, these results indicate that endogenous beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling plays an essential role in regulating ET-1 expression in DU145 cells.


Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Knockdown of endogenous beta-Cat or Tcf-4 decreases expression of ET-1 in DU145 cells. A, knockdown of endogenous beta-cat or Tcf-4 by gene specific retroviral siRNA. Lysates from DU145 cells stably expressing scrambled-siRNA (Scr-siRNA), siRNA against beta-cat (beta-Cat-siRNA), or siRNA against Tcf-4 (Tcf-4-siRNA) as well as lysates from cells infected with an empty control retrovirus (pRS) were analyzed for beta-cat or Tcf-4 expression by immunoblotting. The same membrane was blotted with an anti-tubulin antibody as the loading control. B, transcriptional activities of beta-cat/Tcf in the beta-cat- or Tcf-4-knockdown DU145 cells. The TOPflash (filled bar) or FOPflash (empty bar) reporter was transfected into DU145 cells expressing Scr-siRNA, beta-Cat-siRNA, or Tcf-4-siRNA. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after transfection. Normalized luciferase activities were expressed as fold activation to the FOPflash luciferase activity of cells expressing Scr-siRNA (arbitrarily defined as 1). C, ET-1 mRNA levels in the beta-cat- or Tcf-4-knockdown DU145 cells. The ET-1 mRNA levels in DU145 cells expressing Scr-siRNA, beta-Cat-siRNA, or Tcf-4-siRNA were determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. The mRNA level of cyclin D1 was included as a positive control. Results were normalized as -fold increase to the ET-1 (filled bar) or the cyclin D1 (empty bar) mRNA level of cells expressing Scr-siRNA (designated as 1) (*, P < 0.05). D, levels of secreted ET-1 in the beta-cat- or Tcf-4-knockdown DU145 cells. Secretion of ET-1 by DU145 cells expressing Scr-siRNA, beta-Cat-siRNA, or Tcf-4-siRNA was quantitated using ELISA and normalized against cell number (*, P < 0.05). E, transcriptional activities of beta-cat/Tcf in DU145 cells overexpressing beta-cat. The TOPflash (filled bar) or FOPflash (empty bar) reporter was cotranfected with a beta-cat-encoding plasmid (beta-Cat) or an empty plasmid (Control) into DU145 cells. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after transfection. Luciferase activities were expressed as -fold activation to the FOPflash luciferase activity of the Control (arbitrarily defined as 1). F and G, ET-1 and cyclin D1 mRNA levels (F) and levels of secreted ET-1 (G) in DU145 cells transiently transfected with beta-cat (*, P < 0.05).

 


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Activation of beta-Cat/Tcf-4 signaling increases expression of ET-1 in LNCaP cells. A, induction of transcriptional activities of beta-cat/Tcf-4 in LNCaP cells. The TOPflash (filled bar) or FOPflash (empty bar) reporter was cotransfected with the beta-cat and/or the Tcf-4 expression plasmids into LNCaP cells. Cells cotransfected with the empty pcDNA3.1 vector and the TOPflash or FOPflash were taken as the control. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h after transfection. Luciferase activities were expressed as -fold activation to the FOPflash luciferase activity of the control (designated as 1). B, ET-1 mRNA levels in LNCaP cells overexpressing beta-cat and/or Tcf-4. The ET-1 (filled bar) and the cyclin D1 (empty bar) mRNA levels in LNCaP cells overexpressing beta-cat and/or Tcf-4 were determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Results were normalized as fold increase to the ET-1 or the cyclin D1 mRNA level of the control, which is arbitrarily defined as 1 (*, P < 0.05). C, secretion of ET-1 in LNCaP cells overexpressing beta-cat and/or Tcf-4 in the presence (filled bar) or absence (empty bar) of thiorphan (1 µM) (*, P < 0.05).

 
Activation of beta-Cat/Tcf-4 Signaling Increases Expression of ET-1 in LNCaP Cells. The LNCaP cell is an androgen-dependent human CaP cell line that minimally expresses ET-1 (Nelson et al., 2001Go). In agreement with a previous report that LNCaP cells exhibit poor CRT activity because of a low expression level of Tcf-4 (Chesire et al., 2002Go), overexpression of beta-cat in LNCaP cells showed little effect on the constitutively low TOPflash luciferase activity, whereas transfection of Tcf-4 alone or cotransfection of beta-cat and Tcf-4 augmented the TOPflash activity by approximately 1.5- and 3-fold, respectively (Fig. 3A). In accordance with the results, overexpression of Tcf-4 alone or with beta-cat increased the ET-1 mRNA level as well as the cyclin D1 mRNA level to approximately 1.5- and 2-fold of the control, respectively (Fig. 3B). ELISA detection of secreted ET-1 in the presence of neutral endopeptidase 24.11 inhibitor thiorphan (Dawson et al., 2004Go) showed that overexpression of Tcf-4 alone or coexpression of beta-cat and Tcf-4 increased the ET-1 protein secretion to approximately 1.5- and 1.9-fold of the control, respectively (Fig. 3C). Thiorphan was used in the culture because LNCaP cells highly express neutral endopeptidase 24.11, a cell-surface enzyme that cleaves and inactivates ET-1 (Sumitomo et al., 2000Go; Sumitomo et al., 2001Go). Together, the results indicate that activated beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling is capable of up-regulating ET-1 expression in LNCaP cells, although ET-1 seems not responsible for the tumorigenicity of LNCaP cells. Together with the findings in DU145 cells, these results suggest that activation of beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling is required to enhance expression of ET-1 in both androgen-independent and -dependent CaP cells.

Knockdown of Endogenous beta-Cat Inhibits Transcription of ET-1 in Mouse Primary PrECs. As both malignant and normal PrECs produce ET-1 (Nelson et al., 2001Go), we next examined whether beta-cat/Tcf-4 regulates expression of ET-1 in normal PrECs. Sequence alignment showed that the mouse ET-1 promoter shares an overall 70% sequence homology with its human counterpart (Harats et al., 1995Go). It is noteworthy that approximately 90% sequence identity is present in the 400-bp region immediately upstream of the TIS. In addition, the –73/–67 TBE, the TATA consensus sequences, and the TIS are conserved both in sequences and in relative locations between the human and the mouse ET-1 promoters (Fig. 4A) (Harats et al., 1995Go). ChIP assays using an anti-Tcf-4 antibody specifically precipitated DNA fragments containing the –73/–67 TBE from the mouse prostate tissue (Fig. 4B), suggesting in vivo binding of Tcf-4 to the mouse ET-1 promoter via the particular TBE.


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Knockdown of endogenous beta-Cat inhibits transcription of ET-1 in primary PrECs. A, partial sequence alignment of the promoter region of human and murine ET-1 genes. The –73/–67 TBE, the TATA box and the TIS are bold and underscored. The unmatched nucleotides are marked with vertical lines. B, binding of Tcf-4 to the mouse ET-1 promoter in vivo. Cross-linked chromatin extracts from mouse prostate tissue were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Tcf-4 antibody ({alpha}-Tcf-4) or an anti-tubulin antibody ({alpha}-tubulin). The ET-1 promoter fragment covering –290 to –65 bp (ETP–260/–65) and a DNA fragment from exon 8 of mouse GAPDH gene were PCR-amplified from the immunoprecipitated and the input chromatin, respectively. C, primary culture of mouse PrECs harboring floxed beta-cat alleles. PrECs were obtained from mice carrying homozygous floxed beta-cat alleles. Primary PrECs on day 2 of culture were immunostained with an anti-pan-cytokeratin antibody. Images of phase contrast (left) and immunofluorescence staining for cytokeratin (right) of the same view field are shown. Epithelial cells (red arrow) and stromal cells (black arrow) are indicated. D, knockdown of beta-cat in mouse PrECs with a Cre recombinase-encoding adenovirus. Lysates from PrECs infected with a Cre recombinase-encoding adenovirus (Cre) or an empty control adenovirus (control) were analyzed for beta-cat expression by immunoblotting 72 h after infection. The same membrane was blotted with an anti-tubulin antibody as the loading control. E and F, deletion of beta-cat down-regulates transcription of ET-1 in mouse primary PrECs. Mouse PrECs infected with an adenovirus encoding Cre recombinase (Cre) or an empty control adenovirus (Control) were analyzed for transcriptional activities of beta-cat/Tcf (E) and levels of ET-1 mRNA and cyclin D1 mRNA (F) (*, P < 0.05). G and H, overexpression of beta-cat increases transcription of ET-1 in mouse primary PrECs. Mouse PrECs were infected with a retrovirus encoding beta-cat or an empty control retrovirus (Control). Transcriptional activities of beta-cat/Tcf (G) and levels of ET-1 mRNA and cyclin D1 mRNA (H) are shown (*, P < 0.05).

 
To investigate the role of beta-cat/Tcf-4 in regulating ET-1 expression in normal PrECs, we made primary PrEC cultures from mice with floxed beta-cat alleles. As shown in Fig. 4C, the majority of the cultured PrECs (~80%) displayed typical epithelial morphology and immunofluorescence staining for epithelial marker cytokeratin (Hanazono et al., 1998Go). In contrast, stromal cells in the same view field showed no cytokeratin staining. These results verify the epithelial nature of the primary cultures as well as the specificity of the immunostaining performed. To ablate expression of beta-cat, the mouse PrEC cultures were infected with an adenovirus encoding Cre recombinase. beta-Cat expression and TOPflash activities were markedly decreased in PrECs infected with the adenoviral-Cre but not in cells infected with a control adenovirus (Fig. 4, D and E). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR showed a 45% down-regulation at the ET-1 mRNA level as well as at the cyclin D1 mRNA level in PrECs with knockdown of beta-cat, compared with that of the control cells (Fig. 4F). Thus, beta-cat/Tcf signaling seems responsible for a substantial part of ET-1 expression in normal prostate epithelium. Furthermore, overexpression of beta-cat by infecting PrECs with a beta-cat-encoding retrovirus elevated the TOPflash activity and the ET-1 mRNA level to approximately 3.5- and 1.9-fold of the control, respectively (Fig. 4, G and H). Together, these results manifest a potent role of beta-cat/Tcf signaling in regulating transcription of the ET-1 gene in normal prostate epithelium.


Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. ET-1 enhances beta-Cat/Tcf signaling via a PI3K-dependent mechanism. A, effects of ET-1 on beta-cat level and GSK-3beta phosphorylation status in DU145 cells. DU145 cells were treated with ET-1 in the presence or absence of PI3K inhibitor LY294002 or ET-A receptor antagonist BQ123 at indicated concentrations for 2 h. Soluble and insoluble cell lysate fractions were prepared as described under Materials and Methods and immunoblotted for beta-cat. The same membrane was blotted with an anti-beta-actin antibody as the loading control. The whole-cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with an anti-GSK-3beta antibody and blotted with an anti-phospho-GSK-3beta (serine 9) antibody. The same membrane was blotted for total GSK-3beta as the loading control. B, effects of ET-1 on transcriptional activities of beta-cat/Tcf in DU145 cells. The TOPflash (filled bar) or FOPflash (empty bar) reporter was transfected into DU145 cells treated with ET-1 (100 pM) and/or BQ123 (5 µM). Normalized luciferase activities were expressed as -fold activation to the FOPflash luciferase activity of untreated control cells (arbitrarily defined as 1). C, effects of ET-1 on transcription of ET-1 in DU145 cells. The ET-1 mRNA levels (filled bar) in DU145 cells treated with ET-1 (100 pM) and/or BQ123 (5 uM) were determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR 24 h after treatment. The mRNA level of cyclin D1 (empty bar) was included as a positive control. Results were normalized as fold increase to the ET-1 or the cyclin D1 mRNA level of untreated control cells (designated as 1) (*, P < 0.05).

 
ET-1 Enhances beta-Cat/Tcf Signaling via a PI3K-Dependent Mechanism. Having established ET-1 as a downstream target of the beta-cat/Tcf pathway in CaP cells as well as in normal prostate epithelium, we sought to determine whether ET-1 could reciprocally affect beta-cat/Tcf signaling. Previous studies had demonstrated that ET-1 stimulates the PI3K/Akt pathway via the ET-A receptor (Shi et al., 2004Go) and that stimulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway increases the stability of soluble beta-cat by phosphorylation and inactivation of GSK-3beta in CaP cells (Sharma et al., 2002Go). To examine the effects of ET-1 on beta-cat/Tcf signaling in CaP cells, we first determined the soluble beta-cat level in DU145 cells treated with ET-1 in the presence or absence of a PI3K-specific inhibitor. As shown in Fig. 5A, exogenous ET-1 (≤100 pM) concentration-dependently increased the soluble beta-cat level in DU145 cells until a plateau was reached. Treatment with selective PI3K inhibitor LY294002 abolished the increase of soluble beta-cat induced by exogenous ET-1. In contrast, beta-actin and insoluble pool of beta-cat showed no detectable change. These results suggest that ET-1 increases soluble beta-cat in DU145 cells through a PI3K-dependent manner. To determine the effect of endogenous ET-1 on soluble beta-cat, a selective ET-A receptor antagonist BQ123 was employed to block endogenous ET-1 function in DU145 cells, because ET-A receptor is the predominant type of ET receptors in CaP cells (Nelson et al., 1996Go). Densitometry showed that treatment of DU145 cells with BQ123 decreased the soluble beta-cat level by approximately 50% of the control in the presence or absence of exogenous ET-1 (Fig. 5A), which indicates that endogenous ET-1 constitutively maintains a part of the soluble beta-cat pool in DU145 cells.


Figure 6
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. beta-Cat/Tcf-4 promotes [3H]thymidine incorporation in DU145 cells partially via ET-1. DU145 cells stably expressing scrambled-siRNA (Scr-siRNA), siRNA against beta-cat (beta-Cat-siRNA), or siRNA against Tcf-4 (Tcf-4-siRNA) were metabolically labeled with [3H]thymidine in the presence or absence of 5 or 100 pM ET-1. The results are expressed as percentages of the [3H]thymidine incorporation of untreated Scr-siRNA-expressing cells, which is arbitrarily defined as 100% (*, P < 0.05).

 


Figure 7
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. ET-1 suppresses paclitaxel-induced apoptosis that is sensitized in the beta-cat- or Tcf-4-knockdown DU145 cells. A, effects of ET-1 on paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown DU145 cells. DU145 cells stably expressing scrambled-siRNA (Scr-siRNA), siRNA against beta-cat (beta-Cat-siRNA), or siRNA against Tcf-4 (Tcf-4-siRNA) were treated with 5 nM paclitaxel (PAC) in the presence or absence of ET-1 (5 or 100 pM) for 12 h. The untreated cells were analyzed as control. Apoptosis/cell death was quantitated using annexin V/PI staining coupled with flow cytometry analysis. The number in each quadrant of the dot figures refers to the percentage of positive cells in total cells. Data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments. B, percentages of dead cells. Sums of percentages of early apoptotic cells (left lower quadrant), late apoptotic cells/dead cells (right upper quadrant) and necrotic cells (right left quadrant) are shown as percentages of dead cells in histograms (mean ± S.D.).

 
GSK-3beta is a major downstream target of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Phosphorylation of GSK-3beta at serine 9 by PI3K/Akt inactivates it and results in subsequent stabilization and accumulation of soluble beta-cat (Sharma et al., 2002Go). To verify that ET-1 increases soluble beta-cat through the PI3K/Akt pathway, we examined serine 9-phosphorylation status of GSK-3beta in DU145 cells treated with ET-1 in the presence or absence of a PI3K-specific inhibitor. To manifest the phosphorylation status of GSK-3beta, DU145 cell lysates were precipitated with an anti-GSK-3beta antibody and blotted with an antibody that specifically recognized the serine 9-phosphoylated GSK-3beta. As expected, exogenous ET-1 (≤100 pM) concentration-dependently enhanced phosphorylation of GSK-3beta, which was blocked by LY294002. BQ123 further reduced the phosphorylation level of GSK-3beta below that of the untreated control, with or without the presence of exogenous ET-1 (Fig. 5A).

Consistent with the above findings, treatment of DU145 cells with exogenous ET-1 increased the TOPflash activities to 2.3-fold of the control and raised the ET-1 and cyclin D1 mRNA levels to approximately 2-fold of the control. LY294002 completely blocked this effect, whereas BQ123 further decreased the TOPflash activity level by approximately 60% and reduced the ET-1 and cyclin D1 mRNA levels by 50% compared with those of the untreated control (Fig. 5, B and C). Together, these results indicate that ET-1 enhances beta-cat/Tcf signaling in DU145 cells by increasing the soluble pool of beta-cat through a PI3K-dependent pathway and that endogenous ET-1 maintains part of the constitutive beta-cat/Tcf signaling in DU145 cells. Together with our findings that beta-cat/Tcf-4 transcriptionally activates ET-1 in CaP cells, these results suggest that a positive feedback loop between beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and ET-1 signaling may function to potentiate both signaling pathways in CaP cells.

beta-Cat/Tcf-4 Promotes [3H]Thymidine Incorporation in DU145 Cells Partially via ET-1. Both beta-cat/Tcf signaling and ET-1 signaling are known to promote proliferation and survival of CaP cells (de la Taille et al., 2003Go; Nelson et al., 2003aGo). To determine functional significance of the beta-cat/Tcf-4-regulated expression of ET-1 in CaP cells, [3H]thymidine incorporation assays were performed to examine the proliferation potential of the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown DU145 cells. [3H]Thymidine incorporation in DU145 cells expressing scrambled siRNA was taken as a control. As shown in Fig. 6, knockdown of beta-cat or Tcf-4 in DU145 cells reduced the [3H]thymidine incorporation to approximately 60% and 45% of the control, respectively. Treatment with exogenous ET-1 at a concentration (5 pM) that is comparable with the level of secreted ET-1 in normal DU145 cells recovered [3H]thymidine incorporation to approximately 85% and 75% of the control, respectively (P < 0.05). In contrast, little change of [3H]thymidine incorporation was observed in control cells treated with 5 pM ET-1. Higher concentration of ET-1 at 100 pM significantly increased [3H]thymidine incorporation in control cells but failed to further rescue [3H]thymidine incorporation in the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown cells, suggesting that ET-1 mediates proliferation of CaP cells partially through beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and that other beta-cat/Tcf-4 target genes play irreplaceable roles in beta-cat/Tcf-mediated CaP cell growth. Annexin V/PI staining in parallel of the [3H]thymidine incorporation assays showed little difference in apoptosis among the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown cells and the control cells (data not shown), indicating that the changes observed in the [3H]thymidine incorporation assays resulted directly from cell proliferation. In addition, the observed cell proliferation-promoting effect of ET-1 seems to be independent of enhancing beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling, because exogenous ET-1 barely rescued beta-cat/Tcf signaling in the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown DU145 cells (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that ET-1 partially mediates beta-cat/Tcf-4–regulated proliferation of DU145 cells as a downstream target of beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling.

ET-1 Suppresses Paclitaxel-Induced Apoptosis That Is Sensitized in the beta-Cat or Tcf-4 Knockdown DU145 Cells. We next examined whether beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling regulates survival of CaP cells via ET-1. Under normal culture conditions, the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown DU145 cells displayed no excessive apoptosis compared with control cells expressing scrambled siRNA (Fig. 7). However, treatment with a low concentration (5 nM) of paclitaxel, an apoptosis-inducing drug used to treat a variety of cancers, including CaP (Kim et al., 2004Go), led to approximately 36% cell death in the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown DU145 cells, whereas only approximately 10% cell death was induced in the control cells. Treatment with exogenous ET-1 significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the cell death to approximately 20% at 5 pM and nearly completely suppressed the paclitaxel-induced apoptosis at 100 pM in the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown DU145 cells. These results indicate that endogenous beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling maintains a state of apoptosis resistance in DU145 cells essentially via ET-1.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have demonstrated in this study that beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling regulates ET-1 expression in both malignant and normal PrECs via direct modulation of the ET-1 promoter activity. Meanwhile, ET-1 stimulates beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling via a PI3K-dependent pathway. The positive inter-regulation between beta-cat/Tcf-4 and ET-1 signaling plays an important role in promoting proliferation and survival of CaP cells.

Both beta-cat and ET-1 are associated with CaP progression, particularly the development of advanced, metastatic CaP (Pirtskhalaishvili and Nelson, 2000Go; Chesire et al., 2002Go). Significantly higher levels of ET-1 or cytoplasmic/nuclear beta-cat were detected in situ in advanced, hormone-refractory CaP than in the primary disease (Nelson et al., 1996Go; Chen et al., 2004Go). In addition, abnormally elevated plasma ET-1 levels were detected in 58% of men with hormone-refractory CaP (Nelson et al., 2001Go). The proportion roughly matches that of high-level cytoplasmic/nuclear beta-cat detected in CaP metastatic sites (Chen et al., 2004Go). Our results are consistent with the previous reports and uncover a mechanistic link between the activation of nuclear beta-cat signaling and the high levels of ET-1 expression detected in advanced, hormone-refractory CaP.

Previous studies indicate that nuclear beta-cat signaling is involved in CaP progression mainly through two pathways, namely, the beta-cat/Tcf pathway and the beta-cat/AR pathway (Chesire et al., 2002Go). Activation of the beta-cat/Tcf pathway promotes cell proliferation and suppresses apoptosis (de la Taille et al., 2003Go). On the other hand, beta-cat interacts with AR in a ligand-dependent manner and potentiates the androgen signaling pathway, which also increases cell proliferation and survival. In androgen-dependent CaP cells, activation of the beta-cat/AR pathway inhibits the beta-cat/Tcf pathway by competing away nuclear beta-cat (Chesire et al., 2002Go; Mulholland et al., 2003Go). Consistent with these reports, our results show that the beta-cat/Tcf pathway is constitutively active in androgen-independent DU145 CaP cells (Fig. 2). It is noteworthy that the beta-cat/Tcf pathway is also constitutively active in mouse primary PrECs, though at a relatively low level (Fig. 4E). It is likely that a reciprocal balance between the beta-cat/Tcf and the beta-cat/AR pathways contributes to the homeostasis of normal prostate epithelium. Disruption of the balance may lead to abnormal cell proliferation and survival, which eventually promotes tumorigenesis.

Our results revealed that ET-1 stimulates beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling in a PI3K-dependent manner in DU145 cells, as a positive feedback to beta-cat/Tcf-4-mediated transcription. As a downstream target of the beta-cat/Tcf-4 pathway, ET-1 may regulate proliferation and survival of CaP cells via traditional ET-1 signaling mechanisms (Nelson et al., 2003aGo). On the other hand, by enhancing beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling, ET-1 may also regulate proliferation and survival of CaP cells through other downstream targets of beta-cat/Tcf-4 in addition to ET-1 itself, such as c-myc and cyclin D1 (de la Taille et al., 2003Go). Consistent with this notion, we found that exogenous ET-1 could only partially rescue DU145 cell proliferation reduced by knocking down beta-cat or Tcf-4 (Fig. 6). However, the beta-cat/Tcf-4 –regulated expression of ET-1 serves as a major contributor to the survival of DU145 cells under severe stress (Fig. 7). The apoptosis-protective effect of ET-1 on DU145 cells seems to be independent of enhancing beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling, because endogenous beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling in the beta-cat or Tcf-4 knockdown DU145 cells was irreversibly abrogated and recalcitrant to rescue by exogenous ET-1 (data not shown). The underlying mechanism remains to be determined.

Previous studies demonstrated the presence of high levels of cytoplasmic/nuclear beta-cat in advanced, hormone-refractory CaP (Chen et al., 2004Go). It is postulated that a portion of hormone-refractory CaP containing cytoplasmic/nuclear beta-cat staining bears elevated CRT because of relief of AR-mediated CRT repression (Chesire and Isaacs, 2003Go). We propose that the elevated CRT promotes expression of ET-1, which in turn further enhances beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and ET-1 expression in a PI3K-dependent manner. The positive feedback loop between beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and ET-1 signaling enhances both signaling pathways to potentiate proliferation and survival of CaP cells against severe stress such as androgen ablation and chemotherapeutic agents, thereby promoting the progression and malignancy of CaP. Hence, the newly uncovered positive inter-regulation between beta-cat/Tcf-4 signaling and ET-1 signaling is likely to represent a novel mechanism that contributes to the progression of at least a subset of androgen-independent CaP that possesses active beta-cat/Tcf signaling. Moreover, our results suggest that a combination of ET-A receptor antagonist and appropriate chemotherapeutic agent(s) could prove effective in treatment of advanced CaP.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Dr. Hans Clevers for the human beta-cat and Tcf-4 expression plasmids and Dr. Gen-Sheng Feng (Burnham Institute for Medical Research, La Jolla, CA) for the Cre recombinase-encoding adenovirus.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by Department of Defense grant PC030922 (to Z.Z.) and National Institutes of Health grant R01-DC006497 (to Z.Z.).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.105.019620.

ABBREVIATIONS: CaP, prostate cancer; beta-cat, beta-catenin; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; GSK-3beta, glycogen synthase kinase-3beta; beta-Trcp, beta-transducin repeat-containing protein; Tcf, T cell factor; ET-A, endothelin-A; CRT, beta-cat/Tcf-related transcription; AR, androgen receptor; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; ETP, ET-1 promoter reporter; muETP, ET-1 promoter reporter (ETP) and its mutant control; LY294002, 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one; BQ123, cyclo(L-Leu-D-Trp-D-Asp-L-Pro-D-Val); FBS, fetal bovine serum; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; CMV, cytomegalovirus; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; TBE, Tcf binding elements; siRNA, small interfering RNA; RT, reverse transcription; PrEC, prostate epithelial cell; ELISA, enzyme-linked imunosorbent assay; bp, base pair(s).

Address correspondence to: Zhuohua Zhang, Burnham Institute for Medical Research, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail: benzz{at}burnham.org.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Barker N and Clevers H (2000) Catenins, Wnt signaling and cancer. Bioessays 22: 961–965.[CrossRef][Medline]

Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, and Agami R (2002) Stable suppression of tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference. Cancer Cell 2: 243–247.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chen G, Shukeir N, Potti A, Sircar K, Aprikian A, Goltzman D, and Rabbani SA (2004) Up-regulation of Wnt-1 and beta-catenin production in patients with advanced metastatic prostate carcinoma: potential pathogenetic and prognostic implications. Cancer 101: 1345–1356.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chesire DR, Ewing CM, Gage WR, and Isaacs WB (2002) In vitro evidence for complex modes of nuclear beta-catenin signaling during prostate growth and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 21: 2679–2694.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chesire DR, Ewing CM, Sauvageto J, Bova GS, and Isaacs WB (2000) Detection and analysis of beta-catenin mutation in prostate cancer. Prostate 45: 323–334.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chesire DR and Isaacs WB (2002) Ligand-dependent inhibition of beta-catenin/TCF signaling by androgen receptor. Oncogene 21: 8453–8469.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chesire DR and Isaacs WB (2003) beta-Catenin signaling in prostate cancer: an early perspective. Endocr Relat Cancer 10: 537–560.[Abstract]

Coward P, Wada HG, Falk MS, Chan SD, Meng F, Akil H, and Conklin BR (1998) Controlling signaling with a specifically designed Gi-coupled receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 352–357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Culig Z, Hobisch A, Hittmair A, Peterziel H, Cato AC, Bartsch G, and Klocker H (1998) Expression, structure and function of androgen receptor in advanced prostatic carcinoma. Prostate 35: 63–70.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dawson LA, Maitland NJ, Turner AJ, and Usmani BA (2004) Stromal-epithelial interactions influence prostate cancer cell invasion by altering the balance of metallopeptidase expression. Br J Cancer 90: 1577–1582.[CrossRef][Medline]

de la Taille A, Rubin MA, Chen MW, Vacherot F, Burchardt M, Buttyan R, and Chopin D (2003) beta-catenin-related anomalies in apoptosis-resistent and hormone-refractory prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 9: 1801–1807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fisher M (2002) The endothelin-1 antagonist, atrasentan, improves time to progression and quality of life in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Clin Prostate Cancer 1: 79–80.[Medline]

Gerstein AV, Almeida TA, Zhao G, Chess E, Buhler K, Pienta K, Rubin MA, Vessella R, and Papadopoulos N (2002) APC/CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) pathway alterations in human prostate cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 34: 9–16.[CrossRef][Medline]

Granchi S, Brocchi S, Bonaccorsi L, Baldi E, Vinci MC, Forti G, Serio M, and Maggi M (2001) Endothelin-1 production by prostate cancer cell lines is up-regulated by factors involved in cancer progression and down-regulated by androgens. Prostate 49: 267–277.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grant ES, Brown T, Roach A, Williams RC, and Habib FK (1997) In vitro expression of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and the ETA and ETB ET receptor by the prostatic epithelium and stroma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 508–513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hanazono M, Nakagawa E, Aizawa S, and Tmooka Y (1998) Establishment of prostatic cell line "Pro9ad" from a p53-deficient mouse. Prostate 36: 102–109.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harats D, Kurihara H, Belloni P, Oakley H, Ziober A, Ackley D, Cain G, Kurihara Y, Lawn R, and Sigal E (1995) Targeting gene expression to the vascular wall in transgenic mice using the murine preproendothelin-1 promoter. J Clin Investig 95: 1335–1344.[Medline]

Kim SJ, Uehara H, Yazici S, Langley RR, He J, Tsan R, Fan D, Killion JJ, and Fidler IJ (2004) Simultaneous blockade of platelet-derived growth factor-receptor and epidermal growth factor-receptor signaling and systemic administration of paclitaxel as therapy for human prostate cancer metastasis in bone of nude mice. Cancer Res 64: 4201–4208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim TH, Xiong H, Zhang Z, and Ren B (2005) beta-Catenin activates the growth factor endothelin-1 in colon cancer cells. Oncogene 24: 597–604.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miller AD and Rosman GJ (1989) Improved retroviral vectors for gene transfer and expression. Biotechniques 7: 980–982.[Medline]

Mulholland DJ, Read JT, Rennie PS, Cox ME, and Nelson CC (2003) Functional localization and competition between the androgen receptor and T-cell factor for nuclear beta-catenin: a means for inhibition of the Tcf signaling axis. Oncogene 22: 5602–5613.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nelson J, Bagnato A, Battistini B, and Nisen P (2003a) The endothelin axis: emerging role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 110–116.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nelson JB, Chan-Tack K, Hedican SP, Magnuson SR, Opgenorth TJ, Bova GS, and Simons JW (1996) Endothelin-1 production and decreased endothelin B receptor expression in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res 56: 663–668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nelson JB, Hedican SP, George DJ, Baldi E, Vinci MC, Forti G, Serio M, and Maggi M (2001) Identification of endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Nat Med 1: 944–949.

Nelson JB, Nabulsi AA, Vogelzang NJ, Breul J, Zonnenberg BA, Daliani DD, Schulman CC, and Carducci MA (2003b) Suppression of prostate cancer induced bone remodeling by the endothelin receptor A antagonist atrasentan. J Urol 169: 1143–1149.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nusse R (1999) Repression and activation. Trends Genet 15: 1–3.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pirtskhalaishvili G and Nelson JB (2000) Endothelin-derived factors as paracrine mediators of prostate cancer progression. Prostate 44: 77–87.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ravindranath N and Dym M (1999) Isolation of rat ventral prostate basal and luminal epithelial cells by the STAPUT technique. Prostate 41: 173–180.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sawicki JA and Rothman CJ (2000) Evidence for stem cells in cultures of mouse prostate epithelial cells. Prostate 50: 46–53.[CrossRef]

Sharma M, Chuang WW, and Sun Z (2002) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt stimulates androgen pathway through GSK3beta inhibition and nuclear beta-catenin accumulation. J Biol Chem 277: 30935–30941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shi WX, Chen Y, Denton CP, Eastwood M, Renzoni EA, Bou-Gharios G, Pearson JD, Dashwood M, du Bois RM, Black CM, et al. (2004) Endothelin-1 promotes myofibroblast induction through the ETA receptor via a rac/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway and is essential for the enhanced contractile phenotype of fibrotic fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell 15: 2707–2719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sumitomo M, Milowsky MI, Shen R, Navarro D, Dai J, Asano T, Hayakawa M, and Nanus DM (2001) Neutral endopeptidase inhibits neuropeptide-mediated transactivation of the insulin-like growth factor receptor-Akt cell survival pathway. Cancer Res 61: 3294–3298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sumitomo M, Shen R, Walburg M, Dai J, Geng Y, Navarro D, Boileau G, Papandreou CN, Giancotti FG, Knudsen B, et al. (2000) Neutral endopeptidase inhibits prostate cancer cell migration by blocking focal adhesion kinase signaling. J Clin Investig 106: 1399–1407.[Medline]

Sun P and Loh HH (2001) Transcriptional regulation of mouse {delta}-opioid receptor gene: role of Ets-1 in the transcriptional activation of mouse {delta}-opioid receptor gene. J Biol Chem 276: 45462–45469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sun P and Loh HH (2002) Transcriptional regulation of mouse {delta}-opioid receptor gene: role of Ikaros in the stimulated transcription of mouse {delta}-opioid receptor gene in activated T cells. J Biol Chem 277: 12854–12860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wodarz A and Nusse R (1998) Mechanisms of Wnt signaling in development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 14: 59–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang Z, Hartmann H, Do Vm, Abramowski D, Sturchler-Pierrat C, Staufenbiel M, Sommer B, van de Wetering M, Clevers H, Saftig P, et al. (1998) Destabilization of beta-catenin by mutations in presenilin-1 potentiates neuronal apoptosis. Nature (Lond) 395: 698–702.[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. R. Folsom, J. S. Pankow, J. M. Peacock, S. J. Bielinski, G. Heiss, and E. Boerwinkle
Variation in TCF7L2 and Increased Risk of Colon Cancer: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2008; 31(5): 905 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)