MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on November 4, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.017236


0026-895X/06/6902-640-649$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 69:640-649, 2006

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.105.017236v1
mol.105.017236v2
69/2/640    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khom, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hering, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khom, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hering, S.

Pharmacological Properties of GABAA Receptors Containing {gamma}1 SubunitsFormula

S. Khom, I. Baburin, E. N. Timin, A. Hohaus, W. Sieghart, and S. Hering

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna (S.K., I.B., E.N.T., A.H., S.H.), and Center of Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (W.S.), Vienna, Austria

Received July 26, 2005; accepted November 4, 2005


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}1, beta2, {gamma}1 subunits are expressed in only a few areas of the brain and thus represent interesting drug targets. The pharmacological properties of this receptor subtype, however, are largely unknown. In the present study, we expressed {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1-GABAA receptors in Xenopus laevis oocytes and analyzed their modulation by 21 ligands from 12 structural classes making use of the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp method and a fast perfusion system. Modulation of GABA-induced chloride currents (IGABA) was studied at GABA concentrations eliciting 5 to 10% of the maximal response. Triazolam, clotiazepam, midazolam, 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10-octahydro-cyclohepta-(b)pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyridin-3-one (CGS 20625), 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinolin-3-one (CGS 9896), diazepam, zolpidem, and bretazenil at 1 µM concentrations were able to significantly (>20%) enhance IGABA in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors. Methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate, 3-methyl-6-[3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl]-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine (Cl 218,872), clobazam, flumazenil, 5-(6-ethyl-7-methoxy-5-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-2-yl)-3-methyl-[1,2,4]-oxadiazole (Ru 33203), 2-phenyl-4-(3-ethyl-piperidinyl)-quinoline (PK 9084), flurazepam, ethyl-7-methoxy-11,12,13,13a-tetrahydro-9-oxo-9H-imidazo[1,5-a]pyrrolo[2,1-c] [1,4]benzodiazepine-1-carboxylate (L-655,708), 2-(6-ethyl-7-methoxy-5-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-2-yl)-4-methyl-thiazole (Ru 33356), and 6-ethyl-7-methoxy-5-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-2-yl)phenylmethanone (Ru 32698) (1 µM each) had no significant effect, and flunitrazepam and 2-phenyl-4-(4-ethyl-piperidinyl)-quinoline (PK 8165) inhibited IGABA. The most potent compounds triazolam, clotiazepam, midazolam, and CGS 20625 were investigated in more detail on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors. The potency and efficiency of these compounds for modulating IGABA was smaller for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 than for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors, and their effects on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 could not be blocked by flumazenil. CGS 20625 displayed the highest efficiency by enhancing at 100 µM IGABA ({alpha}1beta2{gamma}2) by 775 ± 17% versus 526 ± 14% IGABA ({alpha}1beta2{gamma}1) and 157 ± 17% IGABA ({alpha}1beta2) (p < 0.05). These data provide new insight into the pharmacological properties of GABAA receptors containing {gamma}1 subunits and may aid in the design of specific ligands for this receptor subtype.


GABA is the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. It mediates fast synaptic inhibition by interaction with the GABAA receptor. GABAA receptors are ligand-gated ion channels that are modulated by a large number of clinically relevant drugs such as benzodiazepines (BZs), barbiturates, neurosteroids, and anesthetics (Sieghart, 1995Go). They are assembled from individual subunits forming a pentameric structure. Nineteen isoforms of mammalian GABAA receptor subunits have been cloned: {alpha}1–6, beta1–3, {gamma}1–3, {delta}, {epsilon}, p, {rho}1–3, and {theta} (Barnard et al., 1998Go; Simon et al., 2004Go). The major receptor subtype of the GABAA receptor in adults consists of {alpha}1, beta2, and {gamma}2 subunits, and the most likely stoichiometry is two {alpha} subunits, two beta subunits, and one {gamma} subunit (Sieghart and Sperk, 2002Go).

The subunit composition determines the GABA sensitivity and the pharmacological properties of the GABAA receptor (Sieghart, 1995Go; Hevers and Luddens, 1998Go; Boileau et al., 2002Go). The subunit composition of the receptor also affects the time course of the GABA response (desensitization and deactivation of the chloride currents) (Bianchi et al., 2001Go; Boileau et al., 2003Go; Feng et al., 2004Go). Mutation of amino acid residues in {alpha} and {gamma}2 subunits modulate the BZ sensitivity of the receptor, suggesting that the BZ binding pocket is located at the interface between {alpha} and {gamma}2 (Sigel, 2002Go; Ernst et al., 2003Go). There is clear evidence that substitution of the {gamma}2 subunit by either {gamma}1 or {gamma}3 significantly alters the sensitivity for BZ (Hevers and Luddens, 1998Go).

In contrast to the {gamma}2 subunit, which is ubiquitously expressed in the central nervous system, the {gamma}1 subunit is expressed in only a few areas of the brain such as the amygdala (central and medial nuclei), the pallidum, the septum, the substantia nigra, and the thalamus (centrolateral and medial nuclei) (Pirker et al., 2000Go; Korpi et al., 2002Go). Compounds selectively interacting with receptors containing {gamma}1 subunits thus might have a substantial clinical potential.

Compared with receptors containing {gamma}2 subunits, little is known about the pharmacological profile of GABAA channels composed of {alpha}1, beta2, and {gamma}1 subunits. Ymer et al. (1990Go) observed a loss in affinity for the benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 and the inverse agonist methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (DMCM) when the {gamma}1 was substituted for {gamma}2 in {alpha}1beta1{gamma}2 receptors. Negative modulatory effects of Ro 15-4513, beta-CCM, and DMCM for GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}1/2/3beta1{gamma}2 subunits are changed to positive modulatory effects in {alpha}1/2/3beta1{gamma}1 receptors (Puia et al., 1991Go; Wafford et al., 1993Go). Benke et al. (1996Go) observed a low affinity for clonazepam, zolpidem, and flunitrazepam and apparent insensitivity for flumazenil and Ro 15-4513 for {gamma}1-containing receptors. Wafford et al. (1993Go) demonstrated a reduced enhancement of chloride currents through {alpha}3beta2{gamma}3 by diazepam, clonazepam, and bretazenil compared with {alpha}3beta2{gamma}2 and a negative modulatory effect of zolpidem for {alpha}2beta1{gamma}1 and alpidem for {alpha}3beta1{gamma}1 receptors.

Overall, in 4 different studies, a total of 14 compounds from 5 different compound classes have been investigated so far for their ability to modulate GABAA receptors containing {gamma}1 subunits. Unfortunately, most of these studies were carried out under different experimental conditions and with receptors containing different {alpha} and beta subunits combined with {gamma}1. Thus, the relative efficacies of these compounds for {alpha}beta{gamma}1 are not comparable (Hevers and Luddens, 1998Go).

In the present study, we analyzed the modulation of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes by 21 compounds comprising distinct chemical structures. Triazolam, clotiazepam, midazolam, and CGS 20625 exhibited a significant potency and efficiency, whereas the other compounds were either inactive or displayed only a low potency on {gamma}1-containing receptors.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals. Compounds were obtained from the following sources: flunitrazepam (7-nitro-1,3-dihydro-1-methyl-5-o-fluorophenyl-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one), diazepam (7-chloro-1,3-dihydro-1-methyl-5-phenyl-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one), flurazepam (7-chloro-1,3-dihydro-1-ethylaminodiethyl-5-o-fluorophenyl-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one), midazolam [8-chloro-6-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H-imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine], Ro 15-1788, and bretazenil [t-butyl(s)-8-bromo-11,12,13,13a-tetrahydro-9-oxo-9H-imidazo[1,5-a]pyrrolo[2,1-c] [1,4]benodiazepine-1-carboxylate] were from Hoffmann La Roche (Basel, Switzerland); L-655,708 was purchased from Tocris Cookson Inc. (Bristol, UK); clotiazepam [5-(2-chlorophenyl)-7-ethyl-1,3-dihydro-1-methyl-2H-thieno[2,3-e][1,4]diazepin-2-one] was from Troponwerke (Köln, Germany); clobazam [7-chloro-1-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-1,5-benzodiazepine-2,4(3H,5H)-dione] was from sanofi-aventis (Bridgewater, NJ); triazolam [8-chloro-6-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a][1,4]benzodiazepine] was from Sigma (Vienna, Austria); DMCM was from Ferrosan (Soeborg, Denmark); CGS 9896 and CGS 20625 were from Novartis (Basel, Switzerland); zolpidem [N,N,6-trimethyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)imidazo[1,2-a]-pyridine-3-acetamide] was from Synthelabo Recherche (Bagneux, France); Cl 218,872 was from American Cyanamide Comp. (Wayne, NJ); Ru 31719, Ru 32698, Ru 33203, and Ru 33356 were from Roussel Uclaf (Romainville, France); PK 8165 and PK 9084 were from Pharmuka Laboratories (Gennevilliers, France). For chemical structures, see Ogris et al. (2004Go).

Expression and Functional Characterization of GABAA Receptors. X. laevis oocytes were prepared and injected as described previously (Grabner et al., 1996Go). Female X. laevis (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI) were anesthetized by exposing them for 15 min to a 0.2% MS-222 (methane sulfonate salt of 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester; Novartis) solution before surgically removing parts of the ovaries. Follicle membranes from isolated oocytes were enzymatically digested with 2 mg/ml collagenase (type 1A, Sigma). One day after isolation, the oocytes were injected with approximately 10 to 50 nl of a solution of diethyl pyrocarbonate water containing the different cRNAs at a concentration of approximately 300 to 3000 pg/nl/subunit. The amount of cRNA was determined by means of a Nano-Drop ND-1000 (Kisker-Biotech, Steinfurt, Germany). To ensure expression of the {gamma} subunit in the case of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors, cRNAs were mixed in a ratio of 1:1:10, and for receptors comprising only {alpha}1 and beta2 subunits, they were mixed in a ratio of 1:1 (Boileau et al., 2002Go).

Oocytes were stored at 18°C in ND96 solution (Methfessel et al., 1986Go). Electrophysiological experiments were performed by the two-electrode voltage-clamp method making use of a TURBO TEC 01C amplifier (NPI Electronic GmbH, Tamm, Germany) at a holding potential of –70 mV. The bath solution contained 90 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4.

Perfusion System. GABA was applied by means of a modified version of a fast perfusion system according to Hering (1998Go). A schematic drawing of the perfusion chamber and drug application device is shown in Fig. 1A. As described previously, the voltage-clamp experiments on X. laevis oocytes were performed in a small ({approx}15 µl) bath that was covered by a glass plate. Two angular inlet channels in the glass cover (diameter, <1 mm) enabled access of the two microelectrodes to the oocyte. A funnel for drug application surrounded both access channels for the microelectrodes compared with a funnel surrounding a single access channel in Hering (1998Go). This modification increased the stability of oocyte perfusion.


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A, cross-section view of the oocyte perfusion chamber. Two microelectrodes (M1 and M2) are inserted into the angular access inlets in a glass plate (the inlets serve simultaneously as perfusion holes) covering the small ({approx}15 µl) oocyte chamber. Drug was applied by a Tecan Miniprep 60 application tube (AT) to a quartz funnel surrounding the microelectrode access holes (MAH). Residual solution was removed from the funnel before drug application via the funnel outlets (see Hering, 1998Go and the two Supplemental Video files S1 and S2). B, estimation of the rate of solution exchange on an oocyte expressing Kv 1.1 the extracellular potassium concentration was rapidly increased from 1 to 10 mM during a potassium outward current (voltage step from –80 to +20 mV). The time of current decrease (right) from 10 to 90% (t10–90%) was taken as a measure of the volume rate of oocyte perfusion. C, typical time courses of IGABA ({alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors) activated by different GABA concentrations. Upon application of 300 µM GABA, IGABA increased from 10 to 90% within 100 ms. At 100, 30, and 10 µM GABA t10–90% was 140, 180, and 230 ms, respectively.

 
Drug or control solutions were applied to the funnel by means of a Miniprep 60 (Tecan, Durham, NC) that was controlled by a DigiData 1322A (Clampex version 9.2; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA), permitting automation of the experiments [see also Supplemental Videos S1 and S2 (files methods_1.avi and methods_2.avi) for animation of the solution exchange].

To estimate the rate of solution exchange independent of the ligand-receptor interaction, we expressed Kv1.1 channels in X. laevis oocytes and analyzed the time course of current decay during a rapid increase of the extracellular potassium concentration from 1 to 10 mM (sodium was reduced to 80 mM, respectively). Figure 1B illustrates a typical Kv1.1 current during a voltage-clamp step from –80 to +20 mV. The current decrease upon fast perfusion with 10 mM potassium at a speed of 1 ml/s is shown on the right in Fig. 1B. A mean current decline time t10–90% of 140.8 ± 17.5 ms (n = 7) was estimated.

To elicit GABA-induced chloride currents (IGABA), the chamber was perfused with 120 µl of GABA-containing solution at the same volume rate (1 ml/s). The rise time of IGABA ranged usually between 100 and 250 ms (Fig. 1C), which is comparable with the rate of solution exchange estimated in Fig. 1B.

After the initial fast perfusion step for rapid agonist application, the chamber was continuously perfused at a rate of 1 µl/s for a total of 18 s. Before rapid washout of agonist and/or drug, the funnel was emptied by a suction pulse applied to the two funnel outlets (Fig. 1A). The time between this suction pulse and the application of new solution to the funnel was <1 s to avoid evaporation of the bath surrounding the oocyte.

Duration of washout periods was extended from 3 to 30 min, with increasing concentrations of applied GABA to account for slow recovery from increasing levels of apparent desensitization. Oocytes with maximal current amplitudes >3 µA were discarded to minimize voltage-clamp errors.

Analyzing Concentration-Response Curves. Enhancement of chloride currents by modulators of the GABAA receptor was measured at a GABA concentration eliciting between 5 and 10% of the maximal current amplitude (EC5–10). The EC5–10 (usually ranging between 3 and 8 µM) was determined at the beginning of each experiment.

Enhancement of the chloride current (IGABA) was defined as (I(GABA + Comp)/IGABA) – 1, where I(GABA + Comp) is the current response in the presence of a given compound, and IGABA is the control GABA current. To measure the sensitivity of the GABAA receptor for a given compound, it was applied for an equilibration period of 1 min before concomitant application of GABA (EC5–10) and increasing concentrations of the compound. None of the compounds investigated was able to induce chloride flux in the absence of GABA. Concentration-response curves were generated, and the data were fitted by nonlinear regression analysis using ORIGIN software (OriginLab Corp, Northampton, MA). Data were fitted to the equation 1/(1 + (EC50/[Comp])nH), where EC50 is the concentration of the compound that increases the amplitude of the GABA-evoked current by 50%, and nH is the Hill coefficient. Data are given as mean ± S.E. from at least four oocytes and ≥2 oocyte batches. Statistical significance was calculated using unpaired Student's t test with a confidence interval of p < 0.05.


Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A, modulation of chloride currents through GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunits by 1 µM ({square}), 10 µM (Figure 2), and 100 µM ({blacksquare}) of the indicated compounds. Each value represents the mean ± S.E. from at least four oocytes and ≥2 oocyte batches. *, significantly different from 0 (p < 0.05, t test by ANOVA). B, typical traces for enhancement of chloride currents through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 channels by triazolam, clotiazepam, and midazolam at EC5–10. Control currents (GABA, single bar) and corresponding currents elicited by coapplication of GABA and the indicated compound (double bar) are shown.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Modulation of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 Receptors. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacological properties of compounds interacting with {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 GABAA receptors. We have therefore analyzed the modulation of this GABAA receptor subtype by 21 compounds from 12 different structural classes comprising 1,4-benzodiazepines (flunitrazepam, diazepam, flurazepam, midazolam, and triazolam), 1,4-thienodiazepines (clotiazepam), 1,5-benzodiazepines (clobazam), imidazobenzodiazepines (flumazenil, bretazenil, and L-655,708), beta-carbolines (DMCM), pyrazoloquinolines (CGS 9896), pyrazolopyridines (CGS 20625), imidazopyridines (zolpidem), triazolopyridazines (Cl 218,872), imidazoquinolines (Ru 31719), imidazopyrimidines (Ru 32698, Ru 33203, and Ru 33356), and quinolines (PK 8165 and PK 9084).

In a first step, GABAA receptors were activated by GABA concentrations corresponding to EC5–10, and drug effects were screened at a single concentration of 1 µM. As illustrated in Fig. 2 ({square}), only the benzodiazepines triazolam, midazolam, and diazepam, the thienodiazepine clotiazepam, the pyrazolopyridine CGS 20625, and the pyrazoloquinoline CGS 9896 induced an enhancement of >20% at this concentration. The other compounds induced either a very small but statistically significant enhancement (zolpidem and bretazenil), no statistically significant effect (DMCM, Cl 218,872, clobazam, flumazenil, Ru 33203, PK 9084, flurazepam, L-655,708, Ru 31719, Ru 33356, and Ru 32698), or even an inhibition of GABA-induced chloride currents (flunitrazepam and PK 8165), and details are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1 Modulation of the GABA-induced chloride currents by 1 µM concentration of the indicated compounds for receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunits (second column) and {alpha}1beta2 subunits (third column) Each value represents the mean ± S.E. of at least four oocytes from at least two oocyte batches.

 

To establish compounds displaying low potency but high efficiency, all compounds were subsequently tested at higher concentrations (10 and 100 µM) (Fig. 2A). Modulation of GABA receptors at low GABA concentrations (EC5–10 close to "tonic concentrations") can substantially differ from modulation at high concentrations (i.e., millimolar "synaptic concentrations"). We have, therefore, analyzed the effects of all 21 compounds at 1 mM GABA (Fig. 3A). None of the compounds, however, substantially enhanced or inhibited IGABA. Representative chloride currents induced by 1 mM in the absence or presence of 1 µM triazolam or CGS 20625 are shown in Fig. 3B.


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A, modulation of chloride currents through GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunits at 1 mM GABA by 1 µM concentration of the indicated compounds. *, statistically significant differences from 0 (p < 0.05, t test by ANOVA). B, typical enhancement of IGABA through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 channels induced by 1 mM GABA in the absence (control, left traces) and presence of 1 µM triazolam and 1 µM CGS 20625.

 
Contribution of {alpha}1beta2 Receptors. Previous studies have clearly shown that the extent of the incorporation of {gamma} subunits into heterologously expressed GABAA receptors may vary between oocyte batches and decrease with time (Boileau et al., 2002Go). To clarify whether the effects observed were caused by {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 or by {alpha}1beta2-comprising receptors, we analyzed the effect of these compounds on GABAA channels composed of {alpha}1beta2 subunits. With the exception of CGS 20625 (+20 ± 5%), CGS 9896 (+16 ± 7%), flumazenil (+13 ± 5%), and flurazepam (+26 ± 4%), all compounds (1 µM) were either inefficient in enhancing IGABA or even induced significant inhibition (triazolam, clotiazepam, midazolam, Cl 218,872, and PK 8165; Table 1).

For the most potent stimulators of the {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors triazolam, clotiazepam, and midazolam, we also analyzed the inhibition of IGABA in oocytes expressing only {alpha}1beta2 subunits at higher (10 µM) concentrations. Triazolam inhibited the GABA-induced chloride flux in {alpha}1beta2 receptors by –33 ± 4% (n = 12), clotiazepam by –30 ± 8% (n = 7), and midazolam by –31 ± 9% (n = 5) (experiments not shown).

Comparing the Effects of Benzodiazepine Site Ligands on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2s Receptors. Triazolam, clotiazepam, midazolam, and CGS 20625 were subsequently analyzed in more detail by comparing their effects on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors. Figure 4 illustrates the concentration-dependence of the enhancement of the currents (EC5–10) by triazolam, clotiazepam, and midazolam. The EC50 value was determined by fitting the concentration-effect data to the Hill equation. Triazolam enhanced the maximum chloride current of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors by 85% while displaying the highest potency (EC50 {approx} 90 nM) of all tested benzodiazepines. Clotiazepam elicited an enhancement of the GABA response of approximately 170% but had a 19-fold lower potency (EC50 {approx} 1.7 µM) than triazolam. Midazolam was more potent than clotiazepam (EC50 {approx} 1.2 µM) but was 13 times less potent than triazolam, with a maximum enhancement (92%) comparable with triazolam.


Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Concentration-effect curves for triazolam, clotiazepam, and midazolam on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 (bullet) and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors ({blacksquare}) using an EC5–10 GABA concentration (EC50 values are given in Table 2). Data points represent means ± S.E. from at least four oocytes from ≥2 batches.

 
A comparison with the concentration-response data obtained on GABAA channels containing {gamma}2S subunits reveals a 3-fold higher efficiency of triazolam, a 1.5-fold higher efficiency of clotiazepam, and a 3.7-fold higher efficiency of midazolam on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors. The ratio of the EC50 values for triazolam, clotiazepam, and midazolam (EC50/{gamma}1/EC50/{gamma}2S) reflect 4-, 9-, and 8-fold lower potencies of these compounds for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors, respectively (Table 2). The apparent EC50 values, maximum enhancement, and the corresponding ratios for the benzodiazepines tested are given in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2 Potency and efficiency of triazolam, midazolam, clotiazepam, and CGS 20625 for GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 or {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S subunits

The maximum enhancement (percentage of control) and EC50 values were calculated by fitting the data points to a standard concentration-response curve. Rightmost column represents ratios between EC50 values of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors.

 

Modulation of IGABA by Triazolam, Clotiazepam, and Midazolam at Different GABA Concentrations. To gain insight into the mechanism of IGABA enhancement, we studied the GABA dose-effect curves in the absence and presence of the modulators. The results are shown in Fig. 5, A to C. In control, the mean EC50 value for GABA was 39 ± 3 µM in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors and 50 ± 3 µM in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors. The three benzodiazepine receptor ligands shifted the dose-effect curves to the left without affecting the maximal response (Fig. 3A). It is noteworthy that the drug-induced shift was more pronounced for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S than for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors, reflecting the higher efficiency of these ligands on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S.


Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Modulation of the GABA concentration-response curve of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 (left) and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors (right) by 1 µM triazolam (A), 10 µM clotiazepam (B), and 10 µM midazolam (C). The corresponding mean EC50 values were 37 ± 2 µM (control), 26 ± 4 µM (triazolam) for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and 52 ± 7 µM (control), and 17 ± 3 µM (triazolam) for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S (A); 40 ± 8 µM (control), 25 ± 4 µM (clotiazepam) for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and 50 ± 5 µM (control), and 19 ± 3 µM (clotiazepam) for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S (B); and 41 ± 6 µM (control), 22 ± 2 µM (midazolam) for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and 47 ± 11 µM (control), and 13 ± 6 µM (midazolam) for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S (C).

 
Effect of the Pyrazolopyridine CGS 20625 on {alpha}1beta2, {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S Receptors. CGS 20625 elicited maximum enhancement of chloride currents through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors of approximately 645%, with a half-maximal enhancement occurring at approximately 20 µM (Fig. 6B). CGS 20625 thus represents a low potency but highly efficient positive modulator of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors. This compound enhanced the GABA response of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors with comparable efficiency (Imax/{gamma}2/Imax/{gamma}1{approx} 1.12) and was less efficient on {alpha}1beta2 receptors (Fig. 6B). At higher CGS 20625 concentrations (≥300 µM), we observed weaker enhancement of the GABA-induced chloride flux than at 100 µM for all subunit compositions (Fig. 6B).


Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Modulation of IGABA by CGS 20625. A, typical IGABA recordings illustrating concentration-dependent modulation of GABA-elicited chloride currents through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1-containing receptors. B, concentration-effect curves for CGS 20625 on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S (bullet), {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 ({blacktriangleup}), and {alpha}1beta2 ({blacksquare}) receptors. EC50 values and corresponding Hill coefficient were the following: 11.2 ± 0.7 µM, nH = 1.8 ± 0.1 (bullet); 23.7 ± 6.8 µM, nH = 0.9 ± 0.1 ({blacktriangleup}); and 4.3 ± 1.2 µM and nH = 1.4 ± 0.2 ({blacksquare}), respectively. Each data point represents mean ± S.E. from at least four oocytes and ≥2 batches. IGABA at 300 µM (open symbols) were excluded from the fit. C, modulation of the GABA concentration response of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 (left) and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 receptors (right) by 100 µM CGS 20625. The corresponding EC50 values were 39 ± 16 µM (control) and 7 ± 2 µM (CGS 20625) in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors and 56 ± 14 µM (control) and 15 ± 3 µM (CGS 20625) in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors.

 
Effect of Flumazenil on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 Receptors. Flumazenil is a ligand of the BZ binding site of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 GABAA receptors and competitively inhibits the enhancement of GABA-induced chloride currents by benzodiazepine agonists (Wafford et al., 1993Go). It was therefore interesting whether this compound would also inhibit the effects of triazolam and clotiazepam on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors.

Figure 7, A and B (left), illustrates the inhibition by flumazenil of triazolam- or clotiazepam-induced IGABA enhancement in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors. As shown on the right, the effects of triazolam or clotiazepam on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors were not inhibited by 1 µM flumazenil. Moreover, we were unable to study possible antagonistic effects at higher concentrations, because flumazenil induced significant enhancement of IGABA in oocytes expressing {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunits at 10 (22 ± 2%, n = 4) and 100 µM (64 ± 8%, n = 4; Fig. 7C).


Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. A and B, effect of flumazenil on the enhancement of IGABA by triazolam and clotiazepam. The left graphs illustrates the enhancement of IGABA through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2s receptors by triazolam and clotiazepam in the absence and presence of flumazenil. The right graphs illustrate the lack of inhibition of IGABA through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors. C, typical IGABA through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors in the absence (GABA) and presence of the indicated concentrations of flumazenil.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we made use of a fast and automated perfusion technique (Fig. 1) to test a selection of 21 modulators on GABAA receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunits. Solution exchange occurred between 100 and 250 ms (see Materials and Methods and Fig. 1C), which reduced the effects of desensitization on peak current detection compared with conventional bath perfusion.

IGABA of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 Subunit Receptors Is Enhanced by Some Benzodiazepines and the Pyrazolopyridine CGS 20625. The 21 compounds tested comprised benzodiazepines and representatives of other structural classes of ligands of the BZ binding site of GABAA receptors. To determine the most potent modulators of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunit receptors, we first tested the compounds at a concentration of 1 µM. Of the 21 compounds, six induced an enhancement of the GABA response (EC5–10) by more than 20% with the following order of potency: triazolam > clotiazepam > midazolam > CGS 20625 > CGS 9896 > diazepam. Zolpidem and bretazenil induced a small enhancement ({approx}13 and 10%, respectively). The effects of DMCM, Cl 218,872, clobazam, flumazenil, Ru 33203, PK 9084, flurazepam, L-655,708, Ru 31719, Ru 33356, and Ru 32698 were not significantly different from control. In contrast, flunitrazepam and PK 8165 significantly inhibited the GABA-induced chloride flux. Application of higher concentrations (10 and 100 µM) revealed a moderate enhancement at high concentrations (low-potency modulation) by bretazenil, DMCM, flumazenil, Ru 33203, Ru 32698, and flunitrazepam. All compounds were tested in the absence of GABA (data not shown). None of them induced measurable currents, even at high concentrations (up to 100 µM). Thus, the 1,4-benzodiazepines triazolam and midazolam, the 1,4-thienodiazepine clotiazepam, and the pyrazolopyridine CGS 20625 seemed to be the most promising candidates for further detailed analysis.

Contribution of the {gamma}1 Subunit to the Enhancement of IGABA. On injection of X. laevis oocytes with {alpha}, beta, and {gamma} subunits, not only are receptors containing all three subunits formed but possibly also receptors composed of {alpha} and beta subunits only (Boileau et al., 2002Go). To investigate whether the observed drug effects were caused by effects on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors or could also be explained by effects on {alpha}1beta2 receptors, the effects of drugs on the latter receptors were also investigated. A comparison of drug effects on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2 receptors revealed that the {gamma}1 subunit was essential for enhancement of IGABA by triazolam, clotiazepam, and midazolam (Table 1 and Fig. 2), because these compounds at 1 µM concentration induced a significant inhibition by –21 ± 4% (n = 12, p < 0.05), (–14 ± 2%, n = 6), and (–20 ± 5%, n = 6), respectively, of IGABA through {alpha}1beta2 subunit receptors. In addition, the effects of several other drugs were clearly different in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2 receptors. Thus, CGS 20625, CGS 9896, diazepam, zolpidem, and bretazenil exhibited an enhancement of IGABA that was higher in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 than in {alpha}1beta2 receptors, supporting the importance of the {gamma}1 subunit for the effects observed. Finally, Cl 218,872 and flurazepam exhibited effects in opposite direction in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2 receptors, again supporting the conclusion that the drug effects observed on injection of oocytes with {alpha}1, beta2, and {gamma}1 subunits were predominantly caused by {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors (Table 1).

Our finding that triazolam, clotiazepam, and midazolam significantly inhibit IGABA through {alpha}1beta2 receptors suggests that we might have underestimated the enhancement of IGABA in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors by these drugs because of simultaneously occurring inhibition of {alpha}1beta2 subunit receptors. The differential effects of various BZ binding site ligands on receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2 subunits are highly interesting by themselves and significantly extend previous evidence for the existence of a low-affinity benzodiazepine binding site at {alpha}beta receptors (Wafford et al., 1993Go; Thomet et al., 1999Go; Walters et al., 2000Go).

To determine the potency and efficiency (maximum ability to enhance the GABA EC5–10 response of the three most potent BZ; Table 2), we studied their concentration effect for receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunits (Fig. 3). The 1,4-benzodiazepine triazolam displayed the highest potency (EC50 {approx} 90 nM), followed by midazolam (EC50 {approx} 1.2 µM) and the 1,4-thienodiazepine clotiazepam (EC50 {approx} 1.7 µM, Table 2). A comparison of the concentration-effect curves for these benzodiazepine-type ligands with receptors composed of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors revealed a significantly lower efficiency and potency for {gamma}1-containing receptors (Fig. 3 and Table 2).

The Pyrazolopyridine CGS 20625 Displays the Highest Efficiency in Enhancing GABA-Induced Chloride Flux of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 Subunit Receptors. CGS 20625 was identified as the most efficient compound in terms of maximum enhancement of the GABA-induced chloride currents through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 subunit receptors (Fig. 6). This compound induced a maximum enhancement of 645 ± 55% greater than control, which is approximately 3.75-fold the enhancement achieved with clotiazepam (172 ± 24% greater than control), and more than 7 times the enhancement induced by midazolam (92 ± 8% greater than control) or by triazolam (85 ± 7% above control), respectively (Fig. 3). CGS 20625, however, had a potency for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors (EC50 {approx} 20 µM) approximately 200 times lower than that of triazolam and 10 to 20 times lower than that of the other benzodiazepines (Table 2).

A closer inspection of the subunit composition specificity of CGS 20625 action revealed that this drug potentiates {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S subunit receptors to an almost similar extent (Fig. 6B). However, a significantly lower efficiency on {alpha}1beta2 receptors revealed an essential role of a {gamma} subunit.

CGS 20625 at 300 µM caused less enhancement than at 100 µM in {alpha}1beta2, {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1, and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S subunit receptors (Fig. 6B), suggesting that this compound might inhibit chloride currents at high concentrations. Similar behavior was shown previously for the action of another pyrazolopyridine (tracazolate) on GABAA channels (Thompson et al., 2002Go).

CGS 20625 thus represents a low-potency (EC50 {approx} 20 µM) but high-efficiency modulator of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 and {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S subunit-containing receptors (Fig. 6B). This compound was almost not selective for either {gamma}1 or {gamma}2 subunits. {alpha}1beta2 Subunit receptors were, however, stimulated to a significantly lesser extent ({approx}160%) compared with {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1/2S subunit receptors (640–730%) (Fig. 6B).

The competitive antagonist flumazenil (1 µM) inhibited IGABA enhancement of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors but failed to affect the enhancement of IGABA through {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors by triazolam and clotiazepam (Fig. 7, right). These data suggest that flumazenil exhibits either no or a very low affinity for the BZ binding site of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors, or that flumazenil interacts with a binding site different from that for triazolam and clotiazepam at these receptors. The first conclusion is consistent with the observation that the affinity of flumazenil for its binding site was reduced approximately 1000-fold in GABAA receptors in which phenylalanine 77 of the {gamma}2 subunit was mutated to the corresponding residue (isoleucine) of the {gamma}1 subunit ({gamma}2F77I; Buhr et al., 1997Go; Wingrove et al., 2002Go; Ogris et al., 2004Go). At higher concentrations, flumazenil displayed properties of a low-affinity agonist on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1-receptors (10 µM potentiated IGABA by 22 ± 2% and 100 µM by 64 ± 9%).

In addition to flumazenil, the affinities of bretazenil, L-655,708, DMCM, zolpidem, Cl 218,872, and PK 8165 were drastically reduced in receptors containing the {gamma}2F77I point mutation (Ogris et al., 2004Go), as measured by [3H]flunitrazepam binding studies. A low affinity of these compounds for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors could have contributed to their small effects on these receptors observed in the present study. In contrast, replacement of phenylalanine ({gamma}2F77) by the corresponding isoleucine of the {gamma}1 subunit only weakly (2- to 7-fold) reduced the affinity of the classic 1,4-benzodiazepines, the 1,4-thienodiazepine clotiazepam, the 1,5-benzodiazepine clobazam, or the pyrazoloquinoline CGS 9896 (Ogris et al., 2004Go). The small (4- to 9-fold) reduction in potency of triazolam, midazolam, and clotiazepam for enhancing {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 compared with {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 receptors could be explained by a reduced apparent affinity of these compounds for {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors underlining the importance of Phe77 for high-affinity BZ binding (Buhr et al., 1997Go). For other compounds such as flunitrazepam (1 µM), we observed significant inhibition of IGABA in {alpha}1beta2{gamma}1 receptors, indicating the importance of additional amino acids for drug binding and gating.

The different efficiency of triazolam, midazolam, clotiazepam, and CGS 20625 are explained by the different amounts of shifts of the GABA concentration-effect curves (Fig. 5, A–C). Larger shifts induced on {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2S receptors reflect the higher apparent efficiency.

In summary we systematically investigated 21 ligands of the BZ binding site from chemically distinct classes to obtain insight in the pharmacological profile of GABAA receptors comprising a {gamma}1 subunit. Triazolam was identified as a high-potency and CGS 20625 as a high-efficiency modulator of this receptor subtype. Different potencies of triazolam, midazolam, clotiazepam, and CGS 20625 can be explained by different shifts of the GABA dose-effect curve, reflecting different apparent affinities of these compounds.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Drs. Roman Furtmüller and Stanislav Berjukow for helpful suggestions and Stanislav Beyl for preparing the video animation.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung) grant P12649 [GenBank] -MED (to S.H.).

S.K. and I.B. contributed equally to this work.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.105.017236.

ABBREVIATIONS: CGS 20625, 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10-octahydro-cyclohepta-(b)pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyridin-3-one; CGS 9896, 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinolin-3-one; IGABA, GABA-induced chloride currents; DMCM, methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate; Cl 218,872, 3-methyl-6-[3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl]-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine; Ru 33203, 5-(6-ethyl-7-methoxy-5-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-2-yl)-3-methyl-[1,2,4]-oxadiazole; PK 9084, 2-phenyl-4-(3-ethyl-piperidinyl)-quinoline; L-655,708, ethyl-7-methoxy-11,12,13,13a-tetrahydro-9-oxo-9H-imidazo[1,5-a]pyrrolo[2,1-c] [1,4]benzodiazepine-1-carboxylate; Ru 33356, 2-(6-ethyl-7-methoxy-5-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-2-yl)-4-methyl-thiazole; Ru 32698, 6-ethyl-7-methoxy-5-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-2-yl)phenylmethanone; PK 8165, 2-phenyl-4-(4-ethyl-piperidinyl)-quinoline; Ro 15-1788, ethyl-8-fluoro-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate; Ru 31719, (7-ethyl-5-methoxyimidazo[1,2-a]quinolin-2-yl)phenyl methanone; BZ, benzodiazepine; Ro 15-1788, flumazenil; Ro 15-4513, ethyl-8-azido-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo-1,4-benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate; beta-CCM, methyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

Formula The online version of this article (available at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org) contains supplemental material. Back

Address correspondence to: Dr. Steffen Hering, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: steffen.hering{at}univie.ac.at


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Barnard EA, Skolnick P, Olsen RW, Mohler H, Sieghart W, Biggio G, Braestrup C, Bateson AN, and Langer SZ (1998) International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev 50: 291–313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Benke D, Honer M, Michel C, and Mohler H (1996) GABAA receptor subtypes differentiated by their gamma-subunit variants: prevalence, pharmacology and subunit architecture. Neuropharmacology 35: 1413–1423.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bianchi MT, Haas KF, and Macdonald RL (2001) Structural determinants of fast desensitization and desensitization-deactivation coupling in GABAa receptors. J Neurosci 21: 1127–1136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boileau AJ, Baur R, Sharkey LM, Sigel E, and Czajkowski C (2002) The relative amount of cRNA coding for gamma2 subunits affects stimulation by benzodiazepines in GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Neuropharmacology 43: 695–700.[CrossRef][Medline]

Boileau AJ, Li T, Benkwitz C, Czajkowski C, and Pearce RA (2003) Effects of gamma2S subunit incorporation on GABAA receptor macroscopic kinetics. Neuropharmacology 44: 1003–1012.[CrossRef][Medline]

Buhr A, Baur R, and Sigel E (1997) Subtle changes in residue 77 of the {gamma} subunit of {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2 GABAA receptors drastically alter the affinity for ligands of the benzodiazepine binding site. J Biol Chem 272: 11799–11804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ernst M, Brauchart D, Boresch S, and Sieghart W (2003) Comparative modeling of GABAA receptors: limits, insights, future developments. Neuroscience 119: 933–943.[CrossRef][Medline]

Feng HJ, Bianchi MT, and Macdonald RL (2004) Pentobarbital differentially modulates {alpha}1beta3{delta} and {alpha}1beta3{gamma}2L GABAA receptor currents. Mol Pharmacol 66: 988–1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grabner M, Wang Z, Hering S, Striessnig J, and Glossmann H (1996) Transfer of 1,4-dihydropyridine sensitivity from L-type to class A (BI) calcium channels. Neuron 16: 207–218.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hering S (1998) Small-volume and rapid extracellular solution exchange around Xenopus oocytes during voltage-clamp recordings. Pflueg Arch Eur J Physiol 436: 303–307.[Medline]

Hevers W and Luddens H (1998) The diversity of GABAA receptors. Pharmacological and electrophysiological properties of GABAA channel subtypes. Mol Neurobiol 18: 35–86.[Medline]

Korpi ER, Grunder G, and Luddens H (2002) Drug interactions at GABAA receptors. Prog Neurobiol 67: 113–159.[CrossRef][Medline]

Methfessel C, Witzemann V, Takahashi T, Mishina M, Numa S, and Sakmann B (1986) Patch clamp measurements on Xenopus laevis oocytes: currents through endogenous channels and implanted acetylcholine receptor and sodium channels. Pflueg Arch Eur J Physiol 407: 577–588.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ogris W, Poltl A, Hauer B, Ernst M, Oberto A, Wulff P, Hoger H, Wisden W, and Sieghart W (2004) Affinity of various benzodiazepine site ligands in mice with a point mutation in the GABAA receptor gamma2 subunit. Biochem Pharmacol 68: 1621–1629.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pirker S, Schwarzer C, Wieselthaler A, Sieghart W, and Sperk G (2000) GABAA receptors: immunocytochemical distribution of 13 subunits in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience 101: 815–850.[CrossRef][Medline]

Puia G, Vicini S, Seeburg PH, and Costa E (1991) Influence of recombinant gamma-aminobutyric acid-A receptor subunit composition on the action of allosteric modulators of gamma-aminobutyric acid-gated Cl currents. Mol Pharmacol 39: 691–696.[Abstract]

Sieghart W (1995) Structure and pharmacology of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor subtypes. Pharmacol Rev 47: 181–234.[Medline]

Sieghart W and Sperk G (2002) Subunit composition, distribution and function of GABAA receptor subtypes. Curr Top Med Chem 2: 795–816.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sigel E (2002) Mapping of the benzodiazepine recognition site on GABAA receptors. Curr Top Med Chem 2: 833–839.[CrossRef][Medline]

Simon J, Wakimoto H, Fujita N, Lalande M, and Barnard EA (2004) Analysis of the set of GABAA receptor genes in the human genome. J Biol Chem 279: 41422–41435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thomet U, Baur R, Scholze P, Sieghart W, and Sigel E (1999) Dual mode of stimulation by the beta-carboline ZK 91085 of recombinant GABAA receptor currents: molecular determinants affecting its action. Br J Pharmacol 127: 1231–1239.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thompson SA, Wingrove PB, Connelly L, Whiting PJ, and Wafford KA (2002) Tracazolate reveals a novel type of allosteric interaction with recombinant {gamma}-aminobutyric acidA receptors. Mol Pharmacol 61: 861–869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wafford KA, Bain CJ, Whiting PJ, and Kemp JA (1993) Functional comparison of the role of {gamma} subunits in recombinant human {gamma}-aminobutyric acidA/benzodiazepine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 44: 437–442.[Abstract]

Walters RJ, Hadley SH, Morris KD, and Amin J (2000) Benzodiazepines act on GABAA receptors via two distinct and separable mechanisms. Nat Neurosci 3: 1274–1281.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wingrove PB, Safo P, Wheat L, Thompson SA, Wafford KA, and Whiting PJ (2002) Mechanism of alpha-subunit selectivity of benzodiazepine pharmacology at gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 437: 31–39.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ymer S, Draguhn A, Wisden W, Werner P, Keinanen K, Schofield PR, Sprengel R, Pritchett DB, and Seeburg PH (1990) Structural and functional characterization of the gamma 1 subunit of GABAA/benzodiazepine receptors. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 9: 3261–3267.[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
D. Gilbert, A. Esmaeili, and J. W. Lynch
Optimizing the Expression of Recombinant {alpha}{beta}{gamma} GABAA Receptors in HEK293 Cells for High-Throughput Screening
J Biomol Screen, January 1, 2009; 14(1): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Esmaeili, J. W. Lynch, and P. Sah
GABAA Receptors Containing Gamma1 Subunits Contribute to Inhibitory Transmission in the Central Amygdala
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 341 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
R. W. Olsen and W. Sieghart
International Union of Pharmacology. LXX. Subtypes of {gamma}-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors: Classification on the Basis of Subunit Composition, Pharmacology, and Function. Update
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2008; 60(3): 243 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.105.017236v1
mol.105.017236v2
69/2/640    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khom, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hering, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khom, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hering, S.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics