MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on March 9, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.022863


0026-895X/06/6906-1779-1782$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 69:1779-1782, 2006

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.106.022863v1
69/6/1779    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.
Right arrow Articles by Steinbach, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.
Right arrow Articles by Steinbach, J. H.
Accelerated Communication

Enantiomers of Neuroactive Steroids Support a Specific Interaction with the GABA-C Receptor as the Mechanism of Steroid Action

Wenjun Li, Douglas F. Covey, Juha-Matti Alakoskela, Paavo K. J. Kinnunen, and Joe Henry Steinbach

Departments of Anesthesiology (W.L., J.H.S.) and Molecular Biology and Pharmacology (D.F.C.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Helsinki Biophysics and Biomembrane Group, Institute of Biomedicine/Biochemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland (J.-M.A., P.K.J.K.)

Received January 23, 2006; accepted March 9, 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Neuroactive steroids can either potentiate or inhibit a variety of membrane channels. Most studies have suggested that the effects are mediated by specific association of the steroid with the affected channel. However, a recent study of the {rho}1 (GABA-C) receptor (Mol Pharmacol 66:56-69, 2004) concluded that the actions were consistent with an action of the steroid in the lipid bilayer to alter the lateral pressure profile in the membrane. The enantiomers of an optically active compound are expected to have identical physical properties, including interactions with hydrophobic portions of the cell membrane. We have used two pairs of enantiomers (pregnanolone and ent-pregnanolone, allopregnanolone and ent-allopregnanolone) and show that the ability to potentiate (allopregnanolone) or inhibit (pregnanolone) the {rho}1 receptor is enantioselective. Therefore, these results strongly suggest that the actions of these neuroactive steroids are mediated by interactions with chiral regions of the target protein, rather than by a change in membrane properties (including lateral pressure).


Many mechanisms have been proposed to underlie the actions of psychoactive compounds. In general, the mechanisms fall into two classes: mechanisms involving specific interactions with target molecules (e.g., sites on membrane proteins) and mechanisms involving more general effects on the milieu in which the target molecule is found (e.g., effects on membrane lipid packing, mobility or order). Neuroactive steroids are a particular type of compound, which can both modulate the function of membrane channels and also intercalate into biological membranes. Indeed, it seems very likely that a preferred route of access for neuroactive steroids may be through the lipid membrane (Akk et al., 2005Go). However, the question arises of whether effects are mediated through a direct interaction with the receptor protein. Previous studies of neuroactive steroids have shown that the enantiomer of allopregnanolone (3{alpha}5{alpha}P) is much less effective at potentiating responses of the GABA-A receptor (Wittmer et al., 1996Go, Covey et al., 2000Go), the enantiomer of 17beta-estradiol is ineffective at potentiating the human nicotinic {alpha}4beta2 receptor (Paradiso et al., 2001Go), and the enantiomer of (3{alpha},5{alpha},17beta)-3-hydroxyandrostan-17-carbonitrile is less effective at blocking the nicotinic {alpha}4beta2 receptor (Paradiso et al., 2000Go). These observations are consistent with the idea that steroids interact with chiral sites on the target proteins. However, there are two caveats to this interpretation. The first is that not all steroids show enantioselectivity in actions (for example, Nilsson et al., 1998Go; Covey et al., 2000Go). The second is that biological membranes contain optically active components in the lipid milieu that might interact differently with the steroid enantiomers.

A recent study (Morris and Amin, 2004Go) of the actions of pregnanolone [3{alpha}5betaP; (3{alpha},5beta)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one] and allopregnanolone [3{alpha}5{alpha}P; (3{alpha},5{alpha})-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one] on the {rho}1 GABA-C receptor concluded that the actions of these neuroactive steroids were most consistent with the idea that the steroids altered the lateral pressure profile in the membrane (Cantor, 1997Go). 3{alpha}5{alpha}P potentiates the receptor response to low concentrations of GABA, whereas 3{alpha}5betaP inhibits (Morris et al., 1999Go, Goutman and Calvo, 2004Go).

We examined the actions of the natural and unnatural forms of these steroids on the responses of {rho}1 receptors (the unnatural form is indicated by the prefix ent-; for example, ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P). We confirmed the findings that 3{alpha}5betaP inhibits the response to low concentrations of GABA, whereas 3{alpha}5{alpha}P potentiates the receptor response. In contrast, the enantiomers of the natural steroids are much less effective at either potentiating (3{alpha}5{alpha}P) or inhibiting (3{alpha}5betaP) the activation of the {rho}1 receptor.

We also examined the biophysical interactions of each enantiomer pair with natural and artificial membranes (J.-M. Alakoskela, D. F. Covey, and P. K. J. Kinnunen, submitted). 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P show no difference in effects on a variety of measures, including packing of the interior or headgroups, mobility of hydrocarbon chains, phase transitions, or association of the steroid with headgroup or interior region of the leaflet. Likewise, 3{alpha}5betaP and ent-3{alpha}5betaP show no differences in any measured parameter. The data indicate that the enantiomers have identical interactions with membranes for all the parameters examined. As expected, 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and 3{alpha}5betaP are clearly distinct from each other in their biophysical effects on membranes. Therefore, although 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and 3{alpha}5betaP clearly differ from each other in terms of effects on membrane properties, there is no indication that the two enantiomers of a given steroid (that is, 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P or 3{alpha}5betaP and ent-3{alpha}5betaP) do.

These data do not support the idea that steroids act on the {rho}1 receptor by affecting properties of the lipid bilayer. Rather, they are more consistent with the idea that the steroids interact with specific sites, probably on the receptor protein, that recognize specific structural features of the steroid.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experiments were conducted using two-electrode voltage clamp of Xenopus laevis oocytes, as described previously (Steinbach et al., 2000Go; Paradiso et al., 2001Go). A full-length construct of the human {rho}1 receptor was provided by D. Weiss (University of Texas Health Center, San Antonio, TX; see Amin and Weiss, 1996Go), and transferred to pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The construct was sequenced and found to correspond to the published sequence (Gen-Bank accession number M62400 [GenBank] ). cRNA was synthesized using mMessage mMachine T7 kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Eight nanograms were injected into each oocyte in 23 nl. Oocytes were incubated for 40 to 60 h at 18°C before being studied electrophysiologically.

3{alpha}5{alpha}P and 3{alpha}5betaP were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), and enantiomers were prepared as described previously (Hu et al., 1997Go; Nilsson et al., 1998Go). Steroids were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM, then diluted to the appropriate final concentration in recording saline. The maximal final concentration used was 20 µM to avoid problems with steroid solubility. Solutions were applied using glass reservoirs and fluorocarbon or metal tubing to reduce adsorption.

As reported previously (Morris et al., 1999Go; Goutman and Calvo, 2004Go), the effects of steroids reversed very slowly. Because we were concerned about time-dependent changes in control responses during the protracted washes, most experiments were performed by paired applications. At first, 2 applications of GABA alone (200 nM) were applied to measure control responses. Then GABA (200 nM) was applied with 10 µM steroid (either the native or unnatural form). A second control application was then made, followed by GABA with the other member of the enantiomeric pair. A final control application was then made. Responses were measured from the peak (average current for an approximately 5-s interval centered at the peak) to the baseline (average current for an approximately 5-s interval before the response). The effect of steroid was measured by the relative response in the presence of steroid to the control response preceding the application of steroid. All applications were separated by at least 3 min. The order of application (natural or unnatural) was switched between eggs. Subsequent analysis of the effects of the steroids on responses showed that there was no effect of order of application—that is, the relative potentiation of 3{alpha}5{alpha}P was the same irrespective of whether it was applied before or after ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P. The effects of the enantiomeric forms were then compared for each oocyte. Steroids were tested on six separate sets of oocytes injected with {rho}1 cRNA. The maximal concentration of DMSO used was 0.2%. When this concentration of DMSO was applied (without steroid), it had no effect on responses to 200 nM GABA (relative response 0.97 ± 0.05; three oocytes tested). All results are reported as mean ± S.D. (number of observations).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The responses of the injected oocytes to GABA alone were similar to those reported previously (Amin and Weiss, 1996Go; Morris et al., 1999Go; Goutman and Calvo, 2004Go). The concentration-response relationship is described by the Hill equation with an EC50 value of 700 ± 70 nM and a Hill coefficient of 2.0 ± 0.2 (mean ± S.D. of fits to curves from five oocytes). A GABA concentration of 200 nM was chosen for studies of steroids because it corresponded to the concentration required to elicit a response of approximately 10% of the maximum response (Morris and Amin, 2004Go). (The predicted response to 200 nM is 6.4% of maximum.)

The essential results are shown in Fig. 1. This figure shows the responses of an oocyte expressing the {rho}1 receptor to 200 nM GABA, GABA plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5betaP, and GABA plus 10 µM ent-3{alpha}5betaP (Fig. 1A). Note that 3{alpha}5betaP blocks the response, whereas ent-3{alpha}5betaP seems to potentiate. Similar data are shown for responses of a different oocyte to 10 µM3{alpha}5{alpha}P and ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P (Fig. 1D). In this case, the enantiomer has no effect, whereas the natural form potentiates. The concentration of 10 µM steroid was chosen because it has been reported to be maximally effective at inhibiting and close to maximal at potentiating responses (Morris et al., 1999Go; see also Fig. 2). In all, paired responses were obtained from eight oocytes for 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P, and nine oocytes for 3{alpha}5betaP and ent-3{alpha}5betaP. In every oocyte tested, ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P potentiated less than 3{alpha}5{alpha}P whereas ent-3{alpha}5betaP inhibited less than 3{alpha}5betaP (and, actually, ent-3{alpha}5betaP potentiated responses). If we assume that the natural and unnatural forms are equally effective and potent, then this result would be obtained by chance in less than 0.4% of sets of eight pairs and 0.2% for nine pairs. Therefore, we conclude that the natural and unnatural forms are not equivalent in actions on the {rho}1 receptor. Likewise, in five pairs of oocytes tested with 1 µM steroids and five other pairs tested with 20 µM steroids, the enantiomer always produced less potentiation (3{alpha}5{alpha}P) or less inhibition (3{alpha}5betaP), which would happen in fewer than 4% of pairs if the enantiomer was equivalent to the natural steroid.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Responses of oocytes to GABA and enantiomer pairs. Top left (A), response of an oocyte to 200 nM GABA (solid line), then to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM ent-3{alpha}5betaP (dashed line), then to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5betaP (dot-dashed line). Note that the natural enantiomer inhibits the response, whereas the unnatural form potentiates. Top right (D), shows the responses of a different oocyte to 200 nM GABA, then to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P (dashed line), then to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5{alpha}P (dot-dashed line). In this case, the natural form potentiates whereas the unnatural form has no effect. B and C, structures of 3{alpha}5betaP as a flat structure and in a three-dimensional view; E and F, similar structures for 3{alpha}5{alpha}P.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Summary of effects of steroids on responses to 200 nM GABA. Left, summary of the effects of 3{alpha}5betaP (filled symbols) and its enantiomer (open symbols) on the response to 200 nM GABA. An asterisk indicates that the relative response is significantly different from 1 (P < 0.05, t test). The relative responses to 3{alpha}5betaP and ent-3{alpha}5betaP are significantly different from each other at each concentration tested. The data were obtained from five oocytes (1 µM), nine oocytes (10 µM), and five oocytes (20 µM). Right, summary of similar data for the effects of 3{alpha}5{alpha}P (filled symbols) and its enantiomer (open symbols). The relative responses to 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P are significantly different from each other at all concentration tested. The data were obtained from five oocytes (1 µM), eight oocytes (10 µM) and five oocytes (20 µM).

 

The paired comparisons were used because of concerns about slow reversibility of steroid effects (see Materials and Methods). Therefore, the quantitative values for potentiation and inhibition are somewhat less critical for testing the hypothesis. However, the differences are clearly apparent in the parametric data. The concentration-effect relationships for the natural and unnatural forms of the steroids are shown in Fig. 2. The potentiation curve for 3{alpha}5{alpha}P is very similar to that reported earlier (Morris et al., 1999Go), whereas ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P shows essentially no effect over the same concentration range. The inhibition curve for 3{alpha}5betaP is also very similar to that reported earlier (Morris et al., 1999Go). However, ent-3{alpha}5betaP shows a potentiating, rather than inhibiting, action at higher concentrations. For neither steroid pair does the unnatural form show similar effects to the natural form.

In studies of neuroactive steroids at other transmittergated channels, the inhibiting and potentiating effects seem to be independent (e.g., Akk et al., 2001Go; Paradiso et al., 2001Go). Therefore, we performed some experiments to indicate whether 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and 3{alpha}5betaP seem to have independent (that is, multiplicative) actions on the {rho}1 receptor. To do this, we applied 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5{alpha}P for approximately 100 s, then switched to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM3{alpha}5{alpha}P plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5betaP. As shown in Fig. 3, a rapid inhibition occurs. The amount of inhibition was assessed by comparing the response at the maximal inhibition to the response immediately before the blocker was applied. The amount of inhibition for the potentiated response (response reduced to 0.38 ± 0.04, results from three oocytes) is indistinguishable from that obtained for responses to GABA alone (0.39 ± 0.08, n = 9 oocytes; Fig. 2). The response just before the application of 3{alpha}5betaP was potentiated to an average of 1.47 (±0.08, n = 3) times the control response to 200 nM GABA, measured at the same time in the application, which is similar to the data shown in Fig. 2 (1.41 ± 0.17, n = 8). It is difficult to evaluate the predictions of the lateral pressure mechanism when a mixture of steroids is applied. However, the data suggest that the potentiating effects of 3{alpha}5{alpha}P and the inhibiting effects of 3{alpha}5betaP have independent mechanisms, and the net effect is produced by the multiplication of the potentiation and inhibition. We also performed similar experiments using enantiomer pairs. 3{alpha}5betaP (10 µM) blocks responses to the application of 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM ent-3{alpha}5betaP (relative response in the presence of 3{alpha}5betaP was reduced to 0.36 ± 0.03) whereas 10 µM ent-3{alpha}5{alpha}P has little effect on responses potentiated by 3{alpha}5{alpha}P (relative response 0.91 ± 0.05).


Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. 3{alpha}5betaP inhibits responses potentiated by 3{alpha}5{alpha}P. GABA (200 nM) plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5{alpha}P was applied to an oocyte for approximately 100 s; then the solution was changed to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM3{alpha}5{alpha}P plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5betaP for approximately 50 s, and then the solution was switched back to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM 3{alpha}5{alpha}P for approximately 20 s. 3{alpha}5betaP shows a rapid inhibitory effect, which is only partially reversed. On average, the response in the presence of 3{alpha}5{alpha}P is potentiated by 1.47-fold, whereas the addition of 3{alpha}5betaP reduces the potentiated response to 0.38 ± 0.04.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our results demonstrate that the enantiomer of 3{alpha}5{alpha}P is inactive on the {rho}1 receptor, whereas the enantiomer of 3{alpha}5betaP has an effect opposite that of the natural compound.

In a full study (J.-M. Alakoskela, D. F. Covey, and P. K. J. Kinnunen, submitted) of the interactions of 3{alpha}5{alpha}P, 3{alpha}5betaP, and their enantiomers with lipid membranes, the members of an enantiomer pair showed no difference in effects on a variety of measures, including packing of the interior or headgroups, mobility of hydrocarbon chains, hydration of the headgroup region, phase transitions, surface potential, and association of the steroid with headgroup or interior region of the leaflet. In contrast, the 5{alpha}- and 5beta-reduced steroids differ in most of the measures, as expected. These data strongly suggest that the enantiomers of a given steroid interact identically with the membrane.

No technique can directly measure the lateral pressure profile, which can only be calculated or simulated. However, its integral moments, the first of which is related to the splay curvature elastic modulus and spontaneous curvature, and the second to the Gaussian curvature elastic modulus (Cantor, 1999Go), can both be calculated from simulations (Gullingsrud and Schulten, 2004Go) and can be measured as well. We did not directly measure these parameters. In addition, simulations of the behavior of cholesterol-containing bilayers suggest that the lateral pressure profile may be very complex, having an alternating array of very strong tension (contracting) and pressure (expanding) components (Patra, 2005Go). It is not possible to predict how a membrane protein, of irregular shape and presently unknown volume changes during gating, would interact with such a spatially complex pressure distribution. Hence, even the measurement of the first two integral moments could not confirm the pressure profiles to this level of detail. Therefore, the possibility exists that the members of an enantiomer pair could have different effects on the lateral pressure profile even though they have identical effects on all the parameters we measured.

Subject to that caveat, the present results indicate that these neurosteroids, and probably other steroids, act on the {rho}1 receptor by interacting with a chiral site, probably on the receptor protein. It is somewhat surprising that ent-3{alpha}5betaP acts as a potentiator. If the potentiation and inhibition are mediated by interactions at specific sites, this observation suggests that ent-3{alpha}5betaP might have some efficacy at the site for potentiation. Indeed, previous studies of the GABA-A receptor have found that the enantiomers of 5beta-reduced steroids retain more ability to potentiate than do enantiomers of 5{alpha}-reduced steroids (Covey et al., 2000Go). Our results also suggest that 3{alpha}5betaP and 3{alpha}5{alpha}P have independent actions to (respectively) inhibit and potentiate responses of {rho}1 receptors. It seems less likely that a mechanism mediated by effects on lateral pressure would show such a simple interaction as more steroid is incorporated into the membrane.

In any case, the strong enantioselectivity for both 3{alpha}5betaP and 3{alpha}5{alpha}P suggests that an action in the membrane to change a membrane property, such as lateral pressure, is less likely than a direct interaction with a chiral site, probably on the {rho}1 receptor.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank John Bracamontes for advice on the molecular biology and Steven Mennerick and Charles F. Zorumski (Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) for providing oocytes.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant P01-GM47969 (to D.F.C. and J.H.S.). J.H.S. is the Russell and Mary Shelden Professor of Anesthesiology.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.106.022863.

ABBREVIATIONS: 3{alpha}5{alpha}P, allopregnanolone ((3{alpha},5{alpha})-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one); 3{alpha}5betaP, pregnanolone ((3{alpha},5beta)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one); DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.

Address correspondence to: Joe Henry Steinbach, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail: jhs{at}wustl.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Akk G, Bracamontes J, and Steinbach JH (2001) Pregnenolone sulfate block of GABAA receptors: mechanism and involvement of a residue in the M2 region of the {alpha} subunit. J Physiol 532: 673-684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Akk G, Shu HJ, Wang C, Steinbach JH, Zorumski CF, Covey DF, and Mennerick S (2005) Neurosteroid access to the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci 25: 11605-11613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Amin J and Weiss DS (1996) Insights into the activation mechanism of {rho}1 GABA receptors obtained by coexpression of wild type and activation impaired subunits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263: 273-282.[Medline]

Cantor RS (1997) The lateral pressure profile in membranes: a physical mechanism of general anesthesia. Biochemistry 36: 2339-2344.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cantor RS (1999) The influence of membrane lateral pressures on simple geometric models of protein conformational equilibria. Chem Phys Lipids 101: 45-56.[CrossRef][Medline]

Covey DF, Nathan D, Kalkbrenner M, Nilsson KR, Hu Y, Zorumski CF, and Evers AS (2000) Enantioselectivity of pregnanolone-induced {gamma}-aminobutyric acidA receptor modulation and anesthesia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 293: 1009-1016.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goutman JD and Calvo DJ (2004) Studies on the mechanisms of action of picrotoxin, quercetin and pregnanolone at the GABA {rho}1 receptor. Br J Pharmacol 141: 717-727.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gullingsrud J and Schulten K (2004) Lipid bilayer pressure profiles and mechano-sensitive channel gating. Biophys J 86: 3496-3509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hu Y, Wittmer LL, Kalkbrenner M, Evers AS, Zorumski CF, and Covey DF (1997) Neurosteroid analogues. Part 5. Enantiomers of neuroactive steroids and benz[e]indenes: total synthesis, electrophysiological effects on GABAA receptor function and anesthetic actions in tadpoles. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans I 3665-3671.

Morris K, Moorefield CN, and Amin J (1999) Differential modulation of the {gamma}-aminobutyric acid type C receptor by neuroactive steroids. Mol Pharmacol 56: 752-759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morris KD and Amin J (2004) Insight into the mechanism of action of neuroactive steroids. Mol Pharmacol 66: 56-69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nilsson KR, Zorumski CF, and Covey DF (1998) Neurosteroid analogues. 6. The synthesis and GABAA receptor pharmacology of enantiomers of dehydroepiandro-sterone sulfate, pregnenolone sulfate and (3{alpha},5beta)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one sulfate. J Med Chem 41: 2604-2613.[CrossRef][Medline]

Paradiso K, Sabey K, Evers AS, Zorumski CF, Covey DF, and Steinbach JH (2000) Steroid inhibition of rat neuronal nicotinic {alpha}4 beta2 receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells. Mol Pharmacol 58: 341-351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Paradiso K, Zhang J, and Steinbach JH (2001) The C terminus of the human nicotinic {alpha}4beta2 receptor forms a binding site required for potentiation by an estrogenic steroid. J Neurosci 21: 6561-6568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Patra M (2005) Lateral pressure profiles in cholesterol-DPPC bilayers. Eur Biophys J 35: 79-88.[CrossRef][Medline]

Steinbach JH, Bracamontes J, Yu L, Zhang PN, and Covey DF (2000) Subunit-specific action of an anticonvulsant thiobutyrolactone on recombinant glycine receptors involves a residue in the M2 membrane-spanning region. Mol Pharmacol 58: 11-17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wittmer LL, Hu YF, Kalkbrenner M, Evers AS, Zorumski CF, and Covey DF (1996) Enantioselectivity of steroid-induced {gamma}-aminobutyric acidA receptor modulation and anesthesia. Mol Pharmacol 50: 1581-1586.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
W. Li, X. Jin, D. F. Covey, and J. H. Steinbach
Neuroactive Steroids and Human Recombinant {rho}1 GABA Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 236 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P. Li, J. Bracamontes, B. W. Katona, D. F. Covey, J. H. Steinbach, and G. Akk
Natural and Enantiomeric Etiocholanolone Interact with Distinct Sites on the Rat {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2L GABAA Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 1582 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.106.022863v1
69/6/1779    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.
Right arrow Articles by Steinbach, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, W.
Right arrow Articles by Steinbach, J. H.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics