![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Departments of Anesthesiology (W.L., J.H.S.) and Molecular Biology and Pharmacology (D.F.C.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Helsinki Biophysics and Biomembrane Group, Institute of Biomedicine/Biochemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland (J.-M.A., P.K.J.K.)
Received January 23, 2006; accepted March 9, 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 (GABA-C) receptor (Mol Pharmacol 66:56-69, 2004) concluded that the actions were consistent with an action of the steroid in the lipid bilayer to alter the lateral pressure profile in the membrane. The enantiomers of an optically active compound are expected to have identical physical properties, including interactions with hydrophobic portions of the cell membrane. We have used two pairs of enantiomers (pregnanolone and ent-pregnanolone, allopregnanolone and ent-allopregnanolone) and show that the ability to potentiate (allopregnanolone) or inhibit (pregnanolone) the
1 receptor is enantioselective. Therefore, these results strongly suggest that the actions of these neuroactive steroids are mediated by interactions with chiral regions of the target protein, rather than by a change in membrane properties (including lateral pressure).
5
P) is much less effective at potentiating responses of the GABA-A receptor (Wittmer et al., 1996
-estradiol is ineffective at potentiating the human nicotinic
4
2 receptor (Paradiso et al., 2001
,5
,17
)-3-hydroxyandrostan-17-carbonitrile is less effective at blocking the nicotinic
4
2 receptor (Paradiso et al., 2000
A recent study (Morris and Amin, 2004
) of the actions of pregnanolone [3
5
P; (3
,5
)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one] and allopregnanolone [3
5
P; (3
,5
)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one] on the
1 GABA-C receptor concluded that the actions of these neuroactive steroids were most consistent with the idea that the steroids altered the lateral pressure profile in the membrane (Cantor, 1997
). 3
5
P potentiates the receptor response to low concentrations of GABA, whereas 3
5
P inhibits (Morris et al., 1999
, Goutman and Calvo, 2004
).
We examined the actions of the natural and unnatural forms of these steroids on the responses of
1 receptors (the unnatural form is indicated by the prefix ent-; for example, ent-3
5
P). We confirmed the findings that 3
5
P inhibits the response to low concentrations of GABA, whereas 3
5
P potentiates the receptor response. In contrast, the enantiomers of the natural steroids are much less effective at either potentiating (3
5
P) or inhibiting (3
5
P) the activation of the
1 receptor.
We also examined the biophysical interactions of each enantiomer pair with natural and artificial membranes (J.-M. Alakoskela, D. F. Covey, and P. K. J. Kinnunen, submitted). 3
5
P and ent-3
5
P show no difference in effects on a variety of measures, including packing of the interior or headgroups, mobility of hydrocarbon chains, phase transitions, or association of the steroid with headgroup or interior region of the leaflet. Likewise, 3
5
P and ent-3
5
P show no differences in any measured parameter. The data indicate that the enantiomers have identical interactions with membranes for all the parameters examined. As expected, 3
5
P and 3
5
P are clearly distinct from each other in their biophysical effects on membranes. Therefore, although 3
5
P and 3
5
P clearly differ from each other in terms of effects on membrane properties, there is no indication that the two enantiomers of a given steroid (that is, 3
5
P and ent-3
5
P or 3
5
P and ent-3
5
P) do.
These data do not support the idea that steroids act on the
1 receptor by affecting properties of the lipid bilayer. Rather, they are more consistent with the idea that the steroids interact with specific sites, probably on the receptor protein, that recognize specific structural features of the steroid.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 receptor was provided by D. Weiss (University of Texas Health Center, San Antonio, TX; see Amin and Weiss, 1996
3
5
P and 3
5
P were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), and enantiomers were prepared as described previously (Hu et al., 1997
; Nilsson et al., 1998
). Steroids were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM, then diluted to the appropriate final concentration in recording saline. The maximal final concentration used was 20 µM to avoid problems with steroid solubility. Solutions were applied using glass reservoirs and fluorocarbon or metal tubing to reduce adsorption.
As reported previously (Morris et al., 1999
; Goutman and Calvo, 2004
), the effects of steroids reversed very slowly. Because we were concerned about time-dependent changes in control responses during the protracted washes, most experiments were performed by paired applications. At first, 2 applications of GABA alone (200 nM) were applied to measure control responses. Then GABA (200 nM) was applied with 10 µM steroid (either the native or unnatural form). A second control application was then made, followed by GABA with the other member of the enantiomeric pair. A final control application was then made. Responses were measured from the peak (average current for an approximately 5-s interval centered at the peak) to the baseline (average current for an approximately 5-s interval before the response). The effect of steroid was measured by the relative response in the presence of steroid to the control response preceding the application of steroid. All applications were separated by at least 3 min. The order of application (natural or unnatural) was switched between eggs. Subsequent analysis of the effects of the steroids on responses showed that there was no effect of order of application—that is, the relative potentiation of 3
5
P was the same irrespective of whether it was applied before or after ent-3
5
P. The effects of the enantiomeric forms were then compared for each oocyte. Steroids were tested on six separate sets of oocytes injected with
1 cRNA. The maximal concentration of DMSO used was 0.2%. When this concentration of DMSO was applied (without steroid), it had no effect on responses to 200 nM GABA (relative response 0.97 ± 0.05; three oocytes tested). All results are reported as mean ± S.D. (number of observations).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The essential results are shown in Fig. 1. This figure shows the responses of an oocyte expressing the
1 receptor to 200 nM GABA, GABA plus 10 µM 3
5
P, and GABA plus 10 µM ent-3
5
P (Fig. 1A). Note that 3
5
P blocks the response, whereas ent-3
5
P seems to potentiate. Similar data are shown for responses of a different oocyte to 10 µM3
5
P and ent-3
5
P (Fig. 1D). In this case, the enantiomer has no effect, whereas the natural form potentiates. The concentration of 10 µM steroid was chosen because it has been reported to be maximally effective at inhibiting and close to maximal at potentiating responses (Morris et al., 1999
; see also Fig. 2). In all, paired responses were obtained from eight oocytes for 3
5
P and ent-3
5
P, and nine oocytes for 3
5
P and ent-3
5
P. In every oocyte tested, ent-3
5
P potentiated less than 3
5
P whereas ent-3
5
P inhibited less than 3
5
P (and, actually, ent-3
5
P potentiated responses). If we assume that the natural and unnatural forms are equally effective and potent, then this result would be obtained by chance in less than 0.4% of sets of eight pairs and 0.2% for nine pairs. Therefore, we conclude that the natural and unnatural forms are not equivalent in actions on the
1 receptor. Likewise, in five pairs of oocytes tested with 1 µM steroids and five other pairs tested with 20 µM steroids, the enantiomer always produced less potentiation (3
5
P) or less inhibition (3
5
P), which would happen in fewer than 4% of pairs if the enantiomer was equivalent to the natural steroid.
|
|
The paired comparisons were used because of concerns about slow reversibility of steroid effects (see Materials and Methods). Therefore, the quantitative values for potentiation and inhibition are somewhat less critical for testing the hypothesis. However, the differences are clearly apparent in the parametric data. The concentration-effect relationships for the natural and unnatural forms of the steroids are shown in Fig. 2. The potentiation curve for 3
5
P is very similar to that reported earlier (Morris et al., 1999
), whereas ent-3
5
P shows essentially no effect over the same concentration range. The inhibition curve for 3
5
P is also very similar to that reported earlier (Morris et al., 1999
). However, ent-3
5
P shows a potentiating, rather than inhibiting, action at higher concentrations. For neither steroid pair does the unnatural form show similar effects to the natural form.
In studies of neuroactive steroids at other transmittergated channels, the inhibiting and potentiating effects seem to be independent (e.g., Akk et al., 2001
; Paradiso et al., 2001
). Therefore, we performed some experiments to indicate whether 3
5
P and 3
5
P seem to have independent (that is, multiplicative) actions on the
1 receptor. To do this, we applied 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM 3
5
P for approximately 100 s, then switched to 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM3
5
P plus 10 µM 3
5
P. As shown in Fig. 3, a rapid inhibition occurs. The amount of inhibition was assessed by comparing the response at the maximal inhibition to the response immediately before the blocker was applied. The amount of inhibition for the potentiated response (response reduced to 0.38 ± 0.04, results from three oocytes) is indistinguishable from that obtained for responses to GABA alone (0.39 ± 0.08, n = 9 oocytes; Fig. 2). The response just before the application of 3
5
P was potentiated to an average of 1.47 (±0.08, n = 3) times the control response to 200 nM GABA, measured at the same time in the application, which is similar to the data shown in Fig. 2 (1.41 ± 0.17, n = 8). It is difficult to evaluate the predictions of the lateral pressure mechanism when a mixture of steroids is applied. However, the data suggest that the potentiating effects of 3
5
P and the inhibiting effects of 3
5
P have independent mechanisms, and the net effect is produced by the multiplication of the potentiation and inhibition. We also performed similar experiments using enantiomer pairs. 3
5
P (10 µM) blocks responses to the application of 200 nM GABA plus 10 µM ent-3
5
P (relative response in the presence of 3
5
P was reduced to 0.36 ± 0.03) whereas 10 µM ent-3
5
P has little effect on responses potentiated by 3
5
P (relative response 0.91 ± 0.05).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5
P is inactive on the
1 receptor, whereas the enantiomer of 3
5
P has an effect opposite that of the natural compound.
In a full study (J.-M. Alakoskela, D. F. Covey, and P. K. J. Kinnunen, submitted) of the interactions of 3
5
P, 3
5
P, and their enantiomers with lipid membranes, the members of an enantiomer pair showed no difference in effects on a variety of measures, including packing of the interior or headgroups, mobility of hydrocarbon chains, hydration of the headgroup region, phase transitions, surface potential, and association of the steroid with headgroup or interior region of the leaflet. In contrast, the 5
- and 5
-reduced steroids differ in most of the measures, as expected. These data strongly suggest that the enantiomers of a given steroid interact identically with the membrane.
No technique can directly measure the lateral pressure profile, which can only be calculated or simulated. However, its integral moments, the first of which is related to the splay curvature elastic modulus and spontaneous curvature, and the second to the Gaussian curvature elastic modulus (Cantor, 1999
), can both be calculated from simulations (Gullingsrud and Schulten, 2004
) and can be measured as well. We did not directly measure these parameters. In addition, simulations of the behavior of cholesterol-containing bilayers suggest that the lateral pressure profile may be very complex, having an alternating array of very strong tension (contracting) and pressure (expanding) components (Patra, 2005
). It is not possible to predict how a membrane protein, of irregular shape and presently unknown volume changes during gating, would interact with such a spatially complex pressure distribution. Hence, even the measurement of the first two integral moments could not confirm the pressure profiles to this level of detail. Therefore, the possibility exists that the members of an enantiomer pair could have different effects on the lateral pressure profile even though they have identical effects on all the parameters we measured.
Subject to that caveat, the present results indicate that these neurosteroids, and probably other steroids, act on the
1 receptor by interacting with a chiral site, probably on the receptor protein. It is somewhat surprising that ent-3
5
P acts as a potentiator. If the potentiation and inhibition are mediated by interactions at specific sites, this observation suggests that ent-3
5
P might have some efficacy at the site for potentiation. Indeed, previous studies of the GABA-A receptor have found that the enantiomers of 5
-reduced steroids retain more ability to potentiate than do enantiomers of 5
-reduced steroids (Covey et al., 2000
). Our results also suggest that 3
5
P and 3
5
P have independent actions to (respectively) inhibit and potentiate responses of
1 receptors. It seems less likely that a mechanism mediated by effects on lateral pressure would show such a simple interaction as more steroid is incorporated into the membrane.
In any case, the strong enantioselectivity for both 3
5
P and 3
5
P suggests that an action in the membrane to change a membrane property, such as lateral pressure, is less likely than a direct interaction with a chiral site, probably on the
1 receptor.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: 3
5
P, allopregnanolone ((3
,5
)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one); 3
5
P, pregnanolone ((3
,5
)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one); DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Address correspondence to: Joe Henry Steinbach, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail: jhs{at}wustl.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunit. J Physiol 532: 673-684.Akk G, Shu HJ, Wang C, Steinbach JH, Zorumski CF, Covey DF, and Mennerick S (2005) Neurosteroid access to the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci 25: 11605-11613.
Amin J and Weiss DS (1996) Insights into the activation mechanism of
1 GABA receptors obtained by coexpression of wild type and activation impaired subunits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263: 273-282.[Medline]
Cantor RS (1997) The lateral pressure profile in membranes: a physical mechanism of general anesthesia. Biochemistry 36: 2339-2344.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cantor RS (1999) The influence of membrane lateral pressures on simple geometric models of protein conformational equilibria. Chem Phys Lipids 101: 45-56.[CrossRef][Medline]
Covey DF, Nathan D, Kalkbrenner M, Nilsson KR, Hu Y, Zorumski CF, and Evers AS (2000) Enantioselectivity of pregnanolone-induced
-aminobutyric acidA receptor modulation and anesthesia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 293: 1009-1016.
Goutman JD and Calvo DJ (2004) Studies on the mechanisms of action of picrotoxin, quercetin and pregnanolone at the GABA
1 receptor. Br J Pharmacol 141: 717-727.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gullingsrud J and Schulten K (2004) Lipid bilayer pressure profiles and mechano-sensitive channel gating. Biophys J 86: 3496-3509.
Hu Y, Wittmer LL, Kalkbrenner M, Evers AS, Zorumski CF, and Covey DF (1997) Neurosteroid analogues. Part 5. Enantiomers of neuroactive steroids and benz[e]indenes: total synthesis, electrophysiological effects on GABAA receptor function and anesthetic actions in tadpoles. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans I 3665-3671.
Morris K, Moorefield CN, and Amin J (1999) Differential modulation of the
-aminobutyric acid type C receptor by neuroactive steroids. Mol Pharmacol 56: 752-759.
Morris KD and Amin J (2004) Insight into the mechanism of action of neuroactive steroids. Mol Pharmacol 66: 56-69.
Nilsson KR, Zorumski CF, and Covey DF (1998) Neurosteroid analogues. 6. The synthesis and GABAA receptor pharmacology of enantiomers of dehydroepiandro-sterone sulfate, pregnenolone sulfate and (3
,5
)-3-hydroxypregnan-20-one sulfate. J Med Chem 41: 2604-2613.[CrossRef][Medline]
Paradiso K, Sabey K, Evers AS, Zorumski CF, Covey DF, and Steinbach JH (2000) Steroid inhibition of rat neuronal nicotinic
4
2 receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells. Mol Pharmacol 58: 341-351.
Paradiso K, Zhang J, and Steinbach JH (2001) The C terminus of the human nicotinic
4
2 receptor forms a binding site required for potentiation by an estrogenic steroid. J Neurosci 21: 6561-6568.
Patra M (2005) Lateral pressure profiles in cholesterol-DPPC bilayers. Eur Biophys J 35: 79-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Steinbach JH, Bracamontes J, Yu L, Zhang PN, and Covey DF (2000) Subunit-specific action of an anticonvulsant thiobutyrolactone on recombinant glycine receptors involves a residue in the M2 membrane-spanning region. Mol Pharmacol 58: 11-17.
Wittmer LL, Hu YF, Kalkbrenner M, Evers AS, Zorumski CF, and Covey DF (1996) Enantioselectivity of steroid-induced
-aminobutyric acidA receptor modulation and anesthesia. Mol Pharmacol 50: 1581-1586.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Li, X. Jin, D. F. Covey, and J. H. Steinbach Neuroactive Steroids and Human Recombinant {rho}1 GABA Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 236 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Li, J. Bracamontes, B. W. Katona, D. F. Covey, J. H. Steinbach, and G. Akk Natural and Enantiomeric Etiocholanolone Interact with Distinct Sites on the Rat {alpha}1beta2{gamma}2L GABAA Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 1582 - 1590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||