![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Received May 23, 2006; accepted May 25, 2006
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Regulation of Chromatin...References |
|---|
, 2000; Manji et al., 2001; Nestler, 2004). In many cases, the relevance of a specific gene to a particular drug action or behavior has been shown using targeted approaches (i.e., mutant mice, viral vectors, RNA interference), demonstrating the functional significance of altered gene expression.
The binding sites and acute actions of psychotropic drugs occur primarily at neurotransmitter receptors or transporters located on cell membranes of pre- and postsynaptic terminals, and the pathways leading from these sites to the regulation of gene expression in the nucleus represent another area of intensive research. Much of the work has focused on intracellular signal transduction cascades and transcription factors that bind to specific gene promoter elements, but the molecular mechanisms that control the expression or repression of genes, referred to as epigenetic mechanisms, have been understudied and underappreciated. Recent progress in cellular and molecular biology has highlighted the importance of chromatin remodeling in controlling rates of gene transcription, revealing a complex set of mechanisms for regulating the accessibility of genes to the transcriptional machinery that is responsible for RNA synthesis and gene expression. An article in this issue (Cassel et al., 2006), as well as other related reports (Kumar et al., 2005; Tsankova et al., 2006), demonstrates that antidepressants and drugs of abuse regulate chromatin remodeling and the molecular machinery associated with this process.
Mechanisms of Chromatin Remodeling. The structural unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which is composed of 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer made up of four pairs of the basic histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4). DNA that is tightly coiled in nucleosomes is inaccessible to DNA binding proteins such as transcription factors, cofactors, and RNA polymerases that comprise the gene transcription machinery (Fig. 1) (for review, see Jenuwein and Allis, 2001; Turner, 2002; Colvis et al., 2005). Access to DNA in the nucleosome occurs via enzymatic remodeling mechanisms involving a complex association of proteins. The amino acid residues in the C-terminal tails of histones are targets for a wide range of post-translational modifying enzymes that contribute to either tighter coiling or relaxation of the DNA-nucleosome complex. In general, increased histone acetylation or hyperacetylation by histone acetylases/acetyltransferases (HATs) is associated with DNA relaxation and elevated transcriptional activity and gene expression, whereas decreased acetylation or hypoacetylation, which is brought about by histone deacetylases (HDACs) and methyl-CpG-binding proteins, such as MeCP2, leads to tighter DNA coiling and gene repression or silencing (Fig. 1). MeCP2 is the prototypical member of a family of methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) proteins that have been linked with transcriptional silencing. MeCP2 has two functional domains: a methyl-CpG binding domain and a transcription repressor domain. It binds with specificity to methylated DNA and then serves to attract chromatin-remodeling machinery consisting of HDACs, the repressor Sin3A and histone methyltransferases that then cause gene silencing. Whereas the actions of HATs and HDACs modify histones at the biochemical level another class of chromatin remodeling enzymes, the SWI/SNF family of genes alters nucleosome structure by using energy from ATP hydrolysis and causes local changes in DNA. This combination of biochemical and structural remodeling of chromatin plays a pivotal role in precise regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription.
|
|
Regulation of Chromatin Remodeling by Psychotropic Drugs |
|---|
|
TopAbstractRegulation of Chromatin...References |
|---|
) provides evidence that psychotropic drugs regulate different forms of methyl-CpG-binding proteins in brains of experimental animals. They report that long-term administration of either a 5-HT-selective reuptake inhibitor (i.e., fluoxetine) or a psychostimulant (i.e., cocaine) increases the expression of MeCP2, as well as another methyl-CpG-binding protein, MBD1, in forebrain regions of adult rat. These effects were most pronounced in the striatum, with similar but milder effects in the frontal cortex and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. The induction of these methyl-CpG DNA binding proteins suggests that there is a repression of gene expression in response to fluoxetine or cocaine treatments. This possibility is supported by analysis of histone modifications and, as predicted, the results demonstrate that acetylation of histone H3 is decreased, indicative of a state of more tightly coiled DNA that may not be as actively transcribed. Although the numbers of HDAC1 and HDAC2 positive cells were not altered, there was an increase in the intensity of immunoreactivity for HDAC2, the more abundant form in the brain regions examined. In addition, levels of HDAC2 mRNA were significantly increased by both fluoxetine and cocaine, indicating that the regulation of histone acetylation occurs via increased expression and recruitment of HDAC to the DNA complex.
The results of this study provide the first evidence that psychotropic drugs can influence chromatin remodeling via the expression of methyl-CpG-binding proteins and represent an exciting new level of understanding of the actions of antidepressants and drugs of abuse. As discussed by the authors, evidence of epigenetic alterations in postmitotic neurons demonstrates the capability for regulating the interpretation of the DNA methylation code that is determined during development. The effects are also dependent on long-term drug administration, although other studies have reported rapid chromatin remodeling effects of drugs that act at dopamine receptors in the striatum (Li et al., 2004). The results also indicate that monoamine neurotransmitter signaling can influence chromatin remodeling, and the role of 5-HT is supported by negative results with selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. However, it will be important to further delineate the actions of fluoxetine and cocaine on chromatin remodeling, because there are clearly functional differences between the 5-HT-selective reuptake inhibitors, which represent the drug class most widely used for the treatment of depression, and psychostimulants such as cocaine that have strong abuse potential. The similar actions of fluoxetine and cocaine on MeCP2, MBD1, and histone acetylation leave many questions unanswered.
One key question is not addressed in this study that could help elucidate the specific effects of these different classes of psychotropic drugs: what gene or sets of genes are regulated by cocaine and fluoxetine administration? Although the results suggest that gene repression takes place when MeCP2 and MBD1 are increased, there is no evidence to support this conclusion. In fact, recent studies from another laboratory demonstrate opposite effects on histone acetylation and increased rather than decreased expression of the specific target genes brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and Cdk5. These two genes have been implicated in the actions of long-term antidepressant and/or psychostimulant administration (Kumar et al., 2005; Tsankova et al., 2006). These studies use a different approach: chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) combined with polymerase chain reaction analysis to amplify specific gene promoters that are bound to acetylated histones. They found that long-term antidepressant administration increases H3 acetylation in the hippocampus and found a corresponding decrease in the expression of HDAC5, with no change in levels of HDAC2. These effects could contribute to the induction of BDNF expression in the hippocampus by antidepressant treatment and could oppose the actions of chronic social stress on BDNF and chromatin remodeling. This study also reports the novel finding that chronic social defeat causes a long-lasting and apparently irreversible increase in histone dimethylation that contributes to repression of BDNF expression, and the authors speculate that this or a similar effect could contribute to chronic depression in humans (Tsankova et al., 2006). In another study from the same group, long-term cocaine administration was found to increase the hyperacetylation of histone H3 at the BDNF and Cdk5 promoters in the striatum (Kumar et al., 2005). The discrepancy between these studies and that by Cassel et al. (2006) are further complicated by a report that MeCP2 binds to and represses BDNF expression in rodent brain under basal conditions (Chen et al., 2003). This further underscores the need to investigate the regulation of specific genes to determine the functional relevance of altered methyl-CpG binding proteins and histone acetylation. In addition, double-labeling approaches (immunohistochemistry combined with in situ hybridization) can be used to analyze gene expression changes in the same cells that exhibit elevated MeCP2 to address the issue of cell specificity, as well as gene repression or activation.
There are several possible explanations for the differences observed in these studies. There are methodological issues, including the drugs used (fluoxetine versus imipramine), dosing paradigms (e.g., length of drug administration), and species (rat versus mouse), as well as type of analysis (expression levels of chromatin binding proteins and enzymes versus ChIP analysis of bound promoters). Cell-specific effects are also possible, in that Cassel et al. (2006) provide evidence that the induction of MeCP2 occurs largely in GABAergic interneurons. Yet another possibility is that there are multiple sites for histone acetylation that could be differentially regulated in concert and in a gene-specific manner, further highlighting the requirement for analysis of the regulation of specific gene targets.
Another interesting issue to consider is the stability of these epigenetic events. Although all of these studies demonstrate that changes in histone modifications and chromatin remodeling require repeated treatments over several days or weeks and are also long-lasting (Tsankova et al., 2006), the repressed state of BDNF expression can be quickly reversed by neuronal depolarization via phosphorylation of MeCP2 (Chen et al., 2003). This demonstrates that chromatin can undergo rapid remodeling in response to neuronal stimulation, as well as long-term regulation by psychotropic drugs, and indicates that additional mechanisms or events may be recruited that can influence stability.
Future Directions and Conclusions. The fact that the histone code (Jenuwein and Allis, 2001) and chromatin remodeling is altered by antidepressants and drugs of abuse provides a platform for further experimentation to seek out the functional consequences of drug-induced chromatin modifications. The recent explosion in technology and molecular tools allows us to conduct elegant high-resolution studies to address fundamental questions about this process. For example, it is now possible to conduct gene expression profiling in the specific cell types where altered MeCP2 and H3 acetylation are observed by combining immunohistochemistry with laser microdissection, RNA amplification, and microarray analysis. Another question that remains unanswered: what intracellular signaling cascades activate specific sets of chromatin/histone modifiers in a manner that leads to recruitment and regulation of specific transcription factors and target genes? There is one study demonstrating a role for the cAMP-protein kinase A cascade in the regulation of histone modification by dopaminergic agents (Li et al., 2004), but multiple additional signaling cascades are likely to underlie the actions of psychotropic drugs. The advent of ChIP-chip (tandem combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation with microarray chips) technology can enable one to study these transcription factor driven gene networks and correlate existing or parallel gene expression data sets. Although ChIP-chip analysis is a very popular and powerful tool, it is currently being applied only to cell lines and has not yet been used to investigate chromatin remodeling and gene expression changes in brain tissue.
The recent progress in understanding transcriptional events at the chromatin level has led to an appreciation of how a well coordinated series of biochemical modifications of histones can result in precise physicochemical alterations of the DNA and can then result in repression or activation of gene expression. The discovery that antidepressants and drugs of abuse can influence this process represents an exciting step in elucidating the molecular actions of these psychotropic agents, which have been previously characterized by virtue of their pharmacology, neurotransmitter modulation, receptor activation, and signaling cascades. On the other hand this is not entirely surprising, in that previous studies have implicated chromatin remodeling either indirectly or directly in the actions of these agents. For example, a primary transcriptional target of antidepressants and drugs of abuse is cAMP response element binding protein, which interacts with another protein, cAMP response element binding protein binding protein, that possesses intrinsic HAT activity. In addition, a drug used for the treatment of bipolar disorder, valproic acid, is an HDAC inhibitor and is believed to exert its therapeutic response, at least in part, via modification of histones (Phiel et al., 2001). The possibility of targeting specific chromatin remodeling players for drug development is supported by studies demonstrating that modification of histone acetylation, by administration of inhibitors or overexpression of specific HDACs, alters behavior in models of depression and drug preference (Kumar et al., 2005; Tsankova et al., 2006). One particularly interesting target is HDAC5, which is decreased by antidepressant treatment; when overexpressed, it was found to block the behavioral effects of antidepressants (Tsankova et al., 2006).
However, further elucidation of the wide-range of histone modifications and the ensuing consequences on gene expression will be necessary before the potential for drug development can be realized. Phosphorylation and ubiquitination are some other examples, in addition to acetylation and methylation, of the rapidly expanding list of modifications. There are also numerous unanswered questions pertaining to the stability, reversibility, global and local frequency, synchrony, and partnerships involved in the modulation of the nucleosome and chromatin remodeling. The study by Cassel et al. (2006) and the related recent articles are exciting leads that will stimulate further studies to characterize the molecular alterations underlying chromatin remodeling and the regulation of these events by psychotropic drugs.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: HDAC, histone deacetylase; MBD, methyl-CpG-binding domain; HAT, histone acetyltransferase; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Ronald S. Duman, 34 Park St, New Haven, CT 06508. E-mail: ronald.duman{at}yale.edu
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractRegulation of Chromatin...References |
|---|
Chen WG, Chang Q, Lin Y, Meissner A, West AE, Griffith EC, Jaenisch R, and Greenberg ME (2003) Derepression of BDNF transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science (Wash DC) 302: 885-889.
Colvis CM, Pollock JD, Goodman RH, Impey S, Dunn J, Mandel G, Champagne FA, Mayford M, Korzus E, Kumar A, et al. (2005) Epigenetic mechanisms and gene networks in the nervous system. J Neurosci 25: 10379-10389.
Duman RS, Heninger GR, and Nestler EJ (1997) A molecular and cellular theory of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54: 597-606.[Abstract]
Duman RS, Malberg J, Nakagawa S, and D'Sa C (2000) Neuronal plasticity and survival in mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 48: 732-739.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jenuwein T and Allis CD (2001) Translating the histone code. Science (Wash DC) 293: 1074-1080.
Kumar A, Choi KH, Renthal W, Tsankova NM, Theobald DE, Truong HT, Russo SJ, Laplant Q, Sasaki TS, Whistler KN, et al. (2005) Chromatin remodeling is a key mechanism underlying cocaine-induced plasticity in striatum. Neuron 48: 303-314.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li J, Guo Y, Schroeder FA, Youngs RM, Schmidt TW, Ferris C, Konradi C, and Akbarian S (2004) Dopamine D2-like antagonists induce chromatin remodeling in striatal neurons through cyclic AMP-protein kinase A and NMDA receptor signaling. J Neurochem 90: 1117-1131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Manji HK, Drevets WC, and Charney DS (2001) The cellular neurobiology of depression. Nat Med 7: 541-547.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nestler EJ (2004) Molecular mechanisms of drug addiction. Neuropharmacology 47 (Suppl 1): 24-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
Phiel CJ, Zhang F, Huang EY, Guenther MG, Lazar MA, and Klein PS (2001) Histone deacetylase is a direct target of valproic acid, a potent anticonvulsant, mood stabilizer, and teratogen. J Biol Chem 276: 36734-36741.
Tsankova NM, Berton O, Renthal W, Kumar A, Neve RL, and Nestler EJ (2006) Sustained hippocampal chromatin regulation in a mouse model of depression and antidepressant action. Nat Neurosci 9: 519-525.[CrossRef][Medline]
Turner BM (2002) Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell 111: 285-291.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related articles in MolPharm:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. C. Pandey, R. Ugale, H. Zhang, L. Tang, and A. Prakash Brain Chromatin Remodeling: A Novel Mechanism of Alcoholism J. Neurosci., April 2, 2008; 28(14): 3729 - 3737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
