![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (W.J.W., R.A.N.); and Department of Biomedical Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield United Kingdom (L.-H.J., A.S.)
Received May 15, 2006; accepted July 13, 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
β-methylene-ATP. By coexpression of wild-type P2X3 and mutated P2X2 subunit, we found that the heteromeric P2X2/3 channel functioned normally when either lysine in the P2X2 subunit was mutated to alanine (i.e., [K69A] or [K308A]) but not when both lysines were mutated to alanine (i.e., [K69A, K308A]). However, coexpression of wild-type P2X2 with a mutated P2X3 subunit ([K68A] or [K299A]) produced no functional heteromers. The rescue of the single lysine mutant P2X2 subunit by wild-type P2X3 (but not the converse) suggests that the heteromeric channel contains one P2X2 and two P2X3 subunits and that the receptor functions essentially normally as long as two subunits are not mutated. The failure to rescue function in the P2X2 subunit with both lysines mutated by wild-type P2X3 suggests that these residues from two different subunits interact in agonist binding or channel opening.
There is good evidence that P2X subunits form channels as trimers (Nicke et al., 1998
; North, 2002
; Jiang et al., 2003
; Barrera et al., 2005
). Like other ligand-gated channels, P2X receptors can form by homo- or hetero-oligomeric assembly of subunits (for review, see North, 2002
). Although both P2X2 and P2X3 subunits are able to form homomeric channels, the heteromeric P2X2/3 receptor that is also formed can be distinguished by its unique functional properties (Lewis et al., 1995
). P2X2 receptors are activated by ATP but not by the analog
β-methylene-ATP (
βmeATP), and the current is largely sustained through a 2-s agonist application. P2X3 receptors are activated by both ATP and
βmeATP, and the current desensitizes very rapidly (<100 ms). The current through heteromeric P2X2/3 channels can be identified as the sustained component when
βmeATP is the agonist (Lewis et al., 1995
).
The molecular operation of P2X subunits is not well understood. Each receptor subunit has intracellular amino and carboxyl termini and two transmembrane domains (TM1: approximately residues 30-50; TM2: approximately residues 330-354) that are joined by an ectodomain of approximately 280 residues. The ectodomain is glycosylated and disulfide-bonded. There are no obvious "canonical" ATP-binding amino acid sequences in the ectodomain. In the case of the P2X2 homomeric receptor, two conserved ectodomain lysine residues have been suggested to play a role in binding the negatively charged phosphate moiety of ATP (Lys69 and Lys308 in rat P2X receptor), but the evidence is most complete for Lys69 (Jiang et al., 2000
). A similar role for the corresponding lysines has also been identified in the case of the P2X1 receptor (Lys68 and Lys309; Ennion et al., 2000
). These lysines are situated approximately 20 amino acids from the outer end of each TM. Experiments on the P2X1 receptor using partial agonists also suggest a role for aromatic residues Phe185 and Phe291 to coordinate the binding of the adenine ring of ATP (Roberts and Evans, 2004
; Vial et al., 2004
). An alternative model of ATP binding has been proposed by Yan et al. (2005
) in the case of the P2X4 receptor. This is based on secondary structure homology between part of the receptor (Lys180-Lys326) and class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (Freist et al., 1998
).
|
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electrophysiology. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made at 19 to 22°C using a HEKA EPC9 amplifier (Heka, Lambrecht, Germany). The holding potential was -60 mV. Patch pipettes (3-6 M
) contained 145 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, and 10 mM EGTA, pH adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH. The external solution contained 147 mM NaC1, 2 mM KC1, 2 mM CaC12, 2 mM MgCl2,10 mM HEPES, and 13 mM glucose, pH adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH. Both internal and external solutions were 290 to 310 mOsM. Agonists were applied using the RSC 200 rapid solution changer (Biologic Science Instruments, Grenoble, France), with flow-pipe tips approximately 150 µm from cell. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (Poole, UK) and were made up daily from aliquots stored at -20°C.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
βmeATP (up to 1 mM; n = 5) (Fig. 1) or ATP (up to 1 mM; n = 7). Immunocytochemistry of transfected cells showed no difference in the pattern or distribution between wild-type and mutated subunits. Figure 1 also shows that equivalent mutations in other rat P2X receptors also prevented any response to agonist [P2X1[K68A]: ATP (300 µM) 23 ± 9 pA, n = 8;
βmeATP (300 mM) no current, n = 3; P2X4[K67A]: ATP (1 mM) no current, n = 8; P2X7[K64A]: ATP (3 mM) no current, n = 3]. Neither P2X2[K69A] nor P2X2[K308A] gave any detectable current in response to 1 or even 3 mM ATP (Fig. 1). However, coexpression of these two mutated receptors clearly did (Fig. 2). The currents were small compared with wild-type P2X2 currents (>600 pA/pF) but not obviously different in other properties (Fig. 2). It was striking that coexpression of two "dead" subunits resulted in formation of a channel that was responsive to 100 or 300 µM ATP. If we assume that neither mutation affects expression or assembly, then one would expect three eighths of all trimeric channels to be [K69A]2·[K308A] and three-eighths to be [K69A]·[K308A]2. This result therefore indicates that the effects of these two point mutations are not independent.
Heteromeric Channels. For the P2X2/3 receptors, there was a striking difference in the effect of a single point mutation of either of the lysine residues, depending whether it was present in the P2X2 or P2X3 subunit. The currents in cells expressing mutant P2X2 receptors with wild-type P2X3 subunits were essentially the same as those observed in wild-type heteromeric receptors (Fig. 3). The
βmeATP concentrations giving half-maximal currents (EC50) were: for P2X2/3 wild-type, 27 ± 3.3 µM (n = 5); for P2X2[K69A] + P2X3, 22 ± 2.6 µM (n = 5), and for P2X2[K308A] + P2X3, 44 ± 2.6 µM (n = 8) (the last two values are significantly different, p < 0.0001). In contrast, cells expressing wild-type P2X2 with P2X3[K63A] subunits showed no currents in response to
βmeATP up to 100 µM. At such high concentrations, P2X2 homomeric receptors are sensitive to
βmeATP (n = 5) (Fig. 3) (see also Jiang et al., 2003
), and the small current observed was presumably passing through such receptors. Likewise, coexpression of wild-type P2X2 subunits with P2X3 [K299A] gave no currents in response to
βmeATP (up to 100 µM, n = 6) (Fig. 3). These results indicate that a wild-type P2X3 subunit can rescue function when it enters a heteromer with a mutated P2X2 subunit, but not vice versa.
|
|
βmeATP (n = 9) (Fig. 3). However, a fast desensitizing current typical of homomeric P2X3 receptors was usually observed (Fig. 3). A schematic summary of the expression of the further P2X2 and P2X3 subunits (either wild-type or mutant) that were coexpressed, and the results of the functional studies, is shown in Fig. 4. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The heterotrimeric P2X2/3 receptor must contain either one or two copies of the P2X3 receptor subunit. The simplest interpretation of the one-way rescue of P2X2 mutants by P2X3 (but not vice versa; Fig. 3), is that the P2X2/3 receptors activated by
βmeATP have two copies of P2X3 and one copy of P2X2. In other words, a functional channel can be formed and activated by
βmeATP even though it contains one dead P2X2 subunit (e.g., P2X2[K69A]) but no opening can be elicited from a receptor comprising two dead P2X3 subunits with a wild-type P2X2 subunit. The rescue of wild-type P2X3 was complete in the case of P2X2[K69A] and slightly less so for P2X2[K308A] (Fig. 3), indicating that the two P2X2 lysines do not have precisely equivalent roles.
This result contrasts with earlier findings in which a highly conserved intracellular C-terminal lysine was mutated (Chaumont et al., 2004
). This lysine is required in homomeric P2X2 and P2X3 receptors for retention in the plasma membrane. In that case, wild-type P2X3 subunits could restore the appearance and retention in the membrane of mutant P2X2 subunits (P2X2[K366A]), and this rescue was fully reciprocal because wild-type P2X2 also restored the appearance of P2X3[K357A]) (Chaumont et al., 2004
). Taken together, these results imply that only a single wild-type subunit is needed for successful retention in the membrane, but two wild-type (P2X3) subunits are needed for channel function. The conclusion that the functional heteromer contains two P2X3 subunits and one P2X2 subunit agrees well with the results of a completely independent approach in which subunits were joined by disulfide bonds between engineered cysteine substitutions at the outer ends of the TMs (Jiang et al., 2003
). The finding is also consistent with the observation that the limiting slope of the Hill plot for activation of the heteromeric P2X2/3 receptor is close to two, whereas for the homomeric P2X3 and homomeric P2X2 receptors, it is close to three (Jiang et al., 2003
). However, the present analysis can not distinguish between different numbers of ligand binding sites and different degrees of intersubunit cooperativity in the heteromeric versus the homomeric channels.
For the homomeric P2X1 and P2X2 receptors, there is evidence that Lys69 and Lys308 contribute to an ATP binding site (Ennion et al., 2000
; Jiang et al., 2000
; Roberts and Evans, 2004
). Therefore, our present finding that the heteromeric channel operates normally even though it incorporates a mutated P2X2 subunit may be interpreted in this context. This would imply that a heterotrimeric P2X receptor could open from a less than fully liganded state. For example, the tetrameric
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (Rosenmund et al., 1998
) and the pentameric glycine receptor (Beato et al., 2002
) can open from less than fully liganded states. But other interpretations are possible. For example, the P2X3 (though not P2X2) subunit lysines may be critical for multimeric channel assembly. Or the mutation might impede the conformational change of gating: a lysine-to-alanine substitution in a single P2X2 subunit of the trimer might provide insufficient energetic impediment, whereas two such independent substitutions in the P2X3 subunits might prevent it completely.
We were surprised to find that cells cotransfected with P2X2[K69A,K308A] subunit and wild-type P2X3 subunit produced no detectable heteromeric current (Fig. 3). In other words, the wild-type P2X3 subunits can rescue function in a channel containing a P2X subunit with a single mutation ([K69A] or [K308A]) (a dead P2X2) but not in a channel containing both those mutations (a "double-dead" P2X2). This could have a simple energetic explanation of the type introduced above; namely, both P2X3 subunits become liganded by
βmeATP, but the mutations provide too great an energy barrier for opening to occur. Or it could indicate that the effects of the lysines are not independent and that an interaction occurs between Lys69 and Lys308. This would be consistent with the finding that in homomeric P2X2 receptors, ATP can elicit currents when P2X2[K69A] and P2X2[K308A] are coexpressed, but not when either is expressed alone.
If one assumes that at least two agonist binding sites are required for channel activation (see above, and Ding and Sachs, 1999
; Jiang et al., 2003
), then these observations can be explained if both Lys69 of one subunit and Lys308 of another (or equivalent for the P2X3 subunits) are needed at one ATP binding site. The presence of a dead P2X2 subunit would still provide for two
βmeATP binding sites (Fig. 4B, left and middle), but a double-dead P2X2 subunit would prevent
βmeATP binding at two sites and therefore prevent channel function (Fig. 4B, right). The interpretation that the agonist site is contributed from two different subunits in a heteromeric channel has parallels with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Sine, 2002
). Moreover, P2X2 subunits carrying mutations of an allosteric zinc binding site have been covalently joined in tandem from concatenated cDNAs; these experiments indicated that histidines from different subunits contribute to the zinc binding site (Nagaya et al., 2005
).
The conclusion that the
βmeATP binding sites forms at the P2X3/P2X3 and P2X2/P2X3 interfaces is consistent with the observations that both nucleotide (Virginio et al., 1998
; Burgard et al., 2000) and non-nucleotide antagonists (Jarvis et al., 2002
, 2004
) mostly fail to discriminate between P2X3 homomeric receptors and P2X2/3 heteromeric receptors. A more complete understanding of the agonist binding site will inform the further development of small molecules that act as competitive antagonists at the P2X2/3 heteromeric receptors; such molecules are likely to have value as pain-relieving drugs.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS:
βmeATP,
β-methylene-ATP
1 Current affiliation: Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. ![]()
Address correspondence to: R. Alan North, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. E-mail: r.a.north{at}manchester.ac.uk
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Barclay J, Patel S, Dorn G, Wotherspoon G, Moffatt S, Eunson L, Abdel'al S, Natt F, Hall J, Winter J, et al. (2002) Functional downregulation of P2X3 receptor subunit in rat sensory neurons reveals a significant role in chronic neuropathic and inflammatory pain. J Neurosci 22: 8139-8147.
Barrera NP, Ormond SJ, Henderson RM, Murrell-Lagnado RD, and Edwardson JM (2005) Atomic force microscopy imaging demonstrates that P2X2 receptors are trimers but that P2X6 receptor subunits do not oligomerize. J Biol Chem 280: 10759-10765.
Beato M, Groot-Kormelink PJ, Colquhoun D, and Sivilotti LG (2002) Openings of the rat recombinant a1 homomeric glycine receptor as a function of the number of agonist molecules bound. J Gen Physiol 119: 443-466.
Chaumont S, Jiang LH, Penna A, North RA, and Rassendren F (2004) Identification of a trafficking motif involved in the stabilization and polarization of P2X receptors. J Biol Chem 279: 29628-29638.
Cockayne DA, Hamilton SG, Zhu QM, Dunn PM, Zhong Y, Novakovic S, Malmberg AB, Cain G, Berson A, Kassotakis L, et al. (2000) Urinary bladder hyporeflexia and reduced pain-related behaviour in P2X3-deficient mice. Nature (Lond) 407: 1011-1015.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cockayne DA, Dunn PM, Zhong Y, Rong W, Hamilton SG, Knight GE, Ruan HZ, Ma B, Yip P, Nunn P, et al. (2005) P2X2 knockout mice and P2X2/P2X3 double knockout mice reveal a role for the P2X2 receptor subunit in mediating multiple sensory effects of ATP. J Physiol 567: 621-639.
Ding S and Sachs F (1999) Single channel properties of P2X2 purinoceptors. J Gen Physiol 113: 695-720.
Ennion S, Hagan S, and Evans RJ (2000) The role of positively charged amino acids in ATP recognition by human P2X1 receptors. J Biol Chem 275: 29361-29367.
Finger TE, Danilova V, Barrows J, Bartel DL, Vigers AJ, Stone L, Hellekant G, and Kinnamon SC (2005) ATP signalling is crucial for communication from taste buds to gustatory nerves. Science (Wash DC) 310: 1495-1499.
Freist W, Verhey JF, Stuhmer W, and Gauss DH (1998) ATP binding site of P2X channel proteins: structural similarities with class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. FEBS Lett 434: 61-65.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gourine AV (2005) On the peripheral and central chemoreception and control of breathing: an emerging role of ATP. J Physiol 568: 715-724.
Honoré P, Kage K, Mikusa J, Watt AT, Johnston JF, Wyatt JR, Faltynek CR, Jarvis MF, and Lynch K (2002) Analgesic profile of intrathecal P2X3 antisense oligonucleotide treatment in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain states in rats. Pain 99: 11-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jarvis MF (2003) Contributions of P2X3 homomeric and heteromeric channels to acute and chronic pain. Expert Opin Ther Targets 7: 513-522.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jarvis MF, Bianchi B, Uchic JT, Cartmell J, Lee CH, Williams M, and Faltynek C (2004) [3H]A-317491, a novel high-affinity non-nucleotide antagonist that specifically labels human P2X2/3 and P2X3 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310: 407-416.
Jarvis MF, Burgard EC, McGaraughty S, Honoré P, Lynch K, Brennan TJ, Subieta A, Van Biesen T, Cartmell J, Bianchi B, et al. (2002) A-317491, a novel potent and selective non-nucleotide antagonist of P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors, reduces chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 17179-17184.
Jiang L-H, Kim M, Spelta V, Bo X, Surprenant A, and North RA (2003) Subunit arrangement in P2X receptors. J Neurosci 23: 8903-8910.
Jiang L-H, Rassendren F, Surprenant A, and North RA (2000) Identification of amino acid residues contributing to the ATP-binding site of a purinergic P2X receptor. J Biol Chem 275: 34190-34196.
Kucenas S, Li Z, Cox JA, Egan TM, and Voigt MM (2003) Molecular characterization of the zebrafish P2X receptor subunit gene family. Neuroscience 121: 935-945.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lewis C, Neidhart S, Holy C, North RA, Buell G, and Surprenant A (1995) Coexpression of P2X2 and P2X3 receptor subunits can account for ATP-gated currents in sensory neurons. Nature (Lond) 377: 432-435.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagaya N, Tittle RK, Saar N, Dellal SS, and Hume RI (2005) An intersubunit zinc binding site in rat P2X2 receptors. J Biol Chem 280: 25982-25993.
Nicke A, Baumert HG, Rettinger J, Eichele A, Lambrecht G, Mutschler E, and Schmalzing G (1998) P2X1 and P2X3 receptors form stable trimers: a novel structural motif of ligand-gated ion channels. EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J 17: 3016-3028.[CrossRef][Medline]
North RA (2002) Molecular physiology of P2X receptors. Physiol Rev 82: 1013-1067.
Roberts JA and Evans RJ (2004) ATP binding at human P2X1 receptors. Contribution of aromatic and basic amino acids revealed using mutagenesis and partial agonists. J Biol Chem 279: 9043-9055.
Rosenmund C, Stern-Bach Y, and Stevens CF (1998) The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel. Science (Wash DC) 280: 1596-1599.
Sine SM (2002) The nicotinic receptor ligand binding domain. J Neurobiol 53: 431-446.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vial C, Roberts JA, and Evans RJ (2004) Molecular properties of ATP-gated P2X receptor ion channels. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25: 487-493.[CrossRef][Medline]
Virginio C, Robertson G, Surprenant A, and North RA (1998) Trinitrophenyl-substituted nucleotides are potent antagonists selective for P2X1, P2X3, and heteromeric P2X2/3 receptors. Mol Pharmacol 53: 969-973.
Vlaskovska M, Kasakov L, Rong W, Bodin P, Bardini M, Cockayne DA, Ford AP, and Burnstock G (2001) P2X3 knock-out mice reveal a major sensory role for urothelially released ATP. J Neurosci 21: 5670-5677.
Yan Z, Liang Z, Tomic M, Obsil T, and Stojilkovic SS (2005) Molecular determinants of the agonist binding domain of a P2X receptor channel. Mol Pharmacol 67: 1078-1088.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Karoly, A. Mike, P. Illes, and Z. Gerevich The Unusual State-Dependent Affinity of P2X3 Receptors Can Be Explained by an Allosteric Two-Open-State Model Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 224 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, A. Surprenant, H.-J. Mao, S. Roger, R. Xia, H. Bradley, and L.-H. Jiang Identification of Key Residues Coordinating Functional Inhibition of P2X7 Receptors by Zinc and Copper Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2008; 73(1): 252 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cao, M. T. Young, H. E. Broomhead, S. J. Fountain, and R. A. North Thr339-to-Serine Substitution in Rat P2X2 Receptor Second Transmembrane Domain Causes Constitutive Opening and Indicates a Gating Role for Lys308 J. Neurosci., November 21, 2007; 27(47): 12916 - 12923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Tittle, J. M. Power, and R. I. Hume A Histidine Scan to Probe the Flexibility of the Rat P2X2 Receptor Zinc-binding Site J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2007; 282(27): 19526 - 19533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Marquez-Klaka, J. Rettinger, Y. Bhargava, T. Eisele, and A. Nicke Identification of an Intersubunit Cross-Link between Substituted Cysteine Residues Located in the Putative ATP Binding Site of the P2X1 Receptor J. Neurosci., February 7, 2007; 27(6): 1456 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||