QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.106.032490v1 71/4/1030    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gu, Z. Articles by Yan, Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gu, Z. Articles by Yan, Z.

RGS4 Modulates Serotonin Signaling in Prefrontal Cortex and Links to Serotonin Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Schizophrenia

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

Received November 8, 2006; accepted January 12, 2007

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Regulator of G protein signaling 4 (RGS4) has recently been identified as one of the genes linked to the susceptibility of schizophrenia. However, the functional roles of RGS4 and how it may be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the possible impact of RGS4 on the function of serotonin and dopamine receptors, two main targets for schizophrenia treatment. Activation of serotonin 5-HT_1A receptors or dopamine D₄ receptors down-regulates the function of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) channel, a key player controlling cognition and emotion, in pyramidal neurons of prefrontal cortex (PFC). Blocking RGS4 function significantly potentiated the 5-HT_1A regulation of NMDAR current; conversely, overexpression of RGS4 attenuated the 5-HT_1A effect. In contrast, the D₄ regulation of NMDAR current was not altered by RGS4 manipulation. Moreover, the 5-HT_1A regulation of NMDA receptors was significantly enhanced in a subset of PFC pyramidal neurons from rats treated with subchronic phencyclidine, an animal model of schizophrenia, which was found to be associated with specifically decreased RGS4 expression in these cells. Thus, our study has revealed an important coupling of RGS4 to serotonin signaling in cortical neurons and provided a molecular and cellular mechanism underlying the potential involvement of RGS4 in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

RGS proteins are known to function as GTPase-activating proteins to dampen or negatively regulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways (Berman et al., 1996; Vries et al., 2000), and have been proposed as new central nervous system drug targets (Neubig and Siderovski, 2002). More than 20 mammalian RGS proteins have been cloned, but how RGS proteins achieve their specificity in regulating numerous G-protein signaling pathways is not fully understood. RGS4 is one of the five members enriched in human brain (Larminie et al., 2004), with the highest expression in prefrontal cortex (Erdely et al., 2004), a major locus of dysfunction in schizophrenia (Weinberger et al., 1986; Andreasen et al., 1997). RGS4 has been shown to modulate both G_i/o- and G_q-mediated signaling in transfected cell lines (Yan et al., 1997; Ghavami et al., 2004). It remains largely unknown how RGS4 may regulate the signaling of different neuromodulators in cortical neurons and how it could contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Converging evidence has implicated the prefrontal cortex (PFC) as a major locus of dysfunction in schizophrenia (Weinberger et al., 1986; Andreasen et al., 1997). Aberrant dopamine and serotonin signaling in PFC plays a central role in the etiology of schizophrenia (Lewis and Lieberman, 2000; Sawa and Snyder, 2002). Antipsychotic drugs derive their therapeutic efficacy mainly by acting on dopamine and serotonin receptors in limbic areas, including PFC (Creese et al., 1976; Lieberman et al., 1998; Meltzer, 1999; Kapur and Remington, 2001). One of the important targets of dopamine and serotonin receptors that could be involved in schizophrenia is the NMDAR channel; NMDAR hypofunction is critically associated with the symptom manifestation of this disease (Tsai and Coyle, 2002; Moghaddam, 2003). The noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) has been found to produce a variety of behavior abnormalities resembling schizophrenia in humans and animals (Allen and Young, 1978; Snyder, 1980; Javitt and Zukin, 1991). Thus, systemic administration of PCP represents the most widely used and best-established model of schizophrenia (Jentsch et al., 1997; Moghaddam and Adams, 1998; Jentsch and Roth, 1999). It has been shown that PFC glutamatergic inputs excite dopamine (DA) neurons in the ventral mesencephalon that project back to PFC but inhibit DA neurons that project to striatum through GABAergic interneurons. Therefore, hypofunctional NMDA receptors in PFC could result in decreased activity of DA neurons projecting to PFC and increased activity of DA neurons projecting to striatum (Sesack and Carr, 2002). Reduced DA inputs in PFC and increased DA inputs in striatum might be responsible for some of the negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia, respectively (Lewis and Lieberman, 2000).

Our recent studies have shown that D₄ and 5-HT_1A receptors, two dopamine and serotonin receptor subtypes highly enriched in PFC (Wedzony et al., 2000; Feng et al., 2001), inhibit NMDA receptor function via both convergent and distinct signaling mechanisms (Wang et al., 2003; Yuen et al., 2005). In this study, we sought to determine whether RGS4 is involved in the modulation of D₄ and 5-HT_1A signaling in PFC pyramidal neurons and whether RGS4 aberration occurs in the rat PCP model of schizophrenia.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Electrophysiological Recordings in Slices. To evaluate the regulation of NMDAR-EPSC in pyramidal neurons located in deep layers (V–VI) of PFC slices from juvenile (3–5 weeks postnatal) Sprague-Dawley rats, the whole-cell voltage-clamp recording technique was used. Electrodes were filled with the following internal solution: 130 mM cesium methanesulfonate, 10 mM CsCl, 4 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM EGTA, 2.2 mM QX-314, 12 mM phosphocreatine, 5 mM MgATP, 0.5 mM Na₂GTP, and 0.1 mM leupeptin, pH 7.2 to 7.3; 265–270 mOsM. The brain slice (300 µm) was placed in a perfusion chamber attached to the fixed-stage of an upright IR differential interference contrast microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and submerged in continuously flowing oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (130 mM NaCl, 26 mM NaHCO₃, 3 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 1.25 mM NaH₂PO₄, 1 mM CaCl₂, and 10 mM glucose) containing 6-cyano-2,3-dihydroxy-7-nitroquinoxaline (20 µM) and bicuculline (10 µM) to block -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid/kainate receptors and GABA_A receptors. Cells were visualized with a 40x water-immersion lens and illuminated with near-IR light, and the image was detected with an IR sensitive charge-coupled device camera. A Multiclamp 700A amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) was used for these recordings. Tight seals (2–10 G) from visualized pyramidal neurons were obtained by the "blow and seal" technique (Stuart et al., 1993). In brief, positive pressure was applied to the patch pipette as it was advancing through the slice to the targeted cell. The positive pressure was released when the pipette tip touched the cell membrane, and a slight negative pressure was then applied to obtain a tight seal. The membrane was disrupted with additional suction, and the whole-cell configuration was obtained. The access resistances ranged from 13 to 18 M and were compensated 50 to 70%. Evoked currents were generated with a 50-µs pulse from a stimulation isolation unit controlled by a S48 pulse generator (Astro-Med, Inc., West Warwick, RI), and the interstimulus interval was 30 s. A bipolar stimulating electrode (FHC Inc., Bowdoinham, ME) was positioned 100 µm from the neuron under recording. Before stimulation, cells (clamped at –70 mV) were depolarized to +60 mV for 3 s to fully relieve the voltage-dependent Mg²⁺ block of NMDAR channels. The Clampfit program (Molecular Devices) was used to analyze evoked synaptic activity. The peak of NMDAR-EPSC was calculated by taking the mean of a 2- to 4-ms window around the peak and comparing with the mean of a 4- to 8-ms window immediately before the stimulation artifact.

Whole-Cell Recordings in Dissociated or Cultured Neurons. Acutely dissociated PFC pyramidal neurons from 4-week-old rats were prepared using procedures described previously (Feng et al., 2001). Some experiments were performed in PFC primary cultures from embryonic day 18 rat embryos that have grown for 3 weeks in vitro (Gu et al., 2005). Recordings of whole-cell, ligandgated ion channel currents employed standard voltage-clamp techniques. Recording pipette was filled with internal solution consisting of 180 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMG), 40 mM HEPES, 4 mM MgCl₂, 0.1 mM BAPTA, 12 mM phosphocreatine, 3 mM Na₂ATP, 0.5 mM Na₂GTP, and 0.1 mM leupeptin, pH 7.2 to 7.3, 265 to 270 mOsM. The external solution consisted of 127 mM NaCl, 20 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM CaCl₂, 5 mM BaCl₂, 12 mM glucose, 0.001 mM tetrodotoxin, and 0.02 mM glycine, pH 7.3 to 7.4, 300 to 305 mOsM. Recordings were obtained with a Molecular Devices 200B patch clamp amplifier that was controlled and monitored with an IBM PC running pCLAMP (ver. 8) with a DigiData 1320 series interface (Molecular Devices). Electrode resistances were typically 2 to 4 M in the bath. After seal rupture, series resistance (4–10 M) was compensated (70–90%) and periodically monitored. The cell membrane potential was held at –60 mV. The application of NMDA (100 µM) evoked a partially desensitizing inward current. NMDA was applied for 2 s every 30 s to minimize desensitization-induced decrease of current amplitude. Peak values were measured for generating the plot as a function of time and drug application. Drugs were applied with a gravity-fed "sewer pipe" system. The array of application capillaries (150 µm i.d.) was positioned a few hundred micrometers from the cell under study. Solution changes were effected by the SF-77B fast-step solution stimulus delivery device (Warner Instrument Co., Hamden, CT).

To test the impact of RGS proteins on GPCR signaling, antibodies raised against their highly specific regions were dialyzed into neurons via the patch electrode for at least 10 min before electrophysiological recordings started. Antibodies used in this study include the N-terminal goat anti-RGS4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), the chicken polyclonal anti-RGS4 (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA), the anti-RGS4 rabbit antibody U1079 (Krumins et al., 2004), the N-terminal rabbit anti-RGS2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and the anti-RGS6/7 rabbit antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). All of the antibodies were diluted at 1:50 to the internal solution.

Data analyses were performed with AxoGraph (Molecular Devices) and Kaleidagraph (Abelbeck/Synergy Software, Reading, PA). ANOVA tests were performed to compare the differential degrees of current modulation between groups subjected to different treatments. The summary data were indicated with mean ± S.E.M.

PCP Administration. The rat PCP model of schizophrenia was generated as we reported recently (Wang et al., 2006). In brief, PCP (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg in sterile saline. This dose of PCP administration to rats has been shown to induce a variety of behavioral and biochemical changes reminiscent of schizophrenia in humans (Jentsch et al., 1997, 1998; Adams and Moghaddam, 1998; Moghaddam and Adams, 1998). Injections were given i.p. at a volume of 1 ml/kg once daily for various days, and rats were sacrificed 24 h after the last injection.

Transfection. Cultured PFC neurons (11 DIV) were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP) or GFP-tagged RGS4 plasmids. GFP was fused at the N terminus of RGS4, which has been shown not to interfere with RGS4 cellular localization or binding to G proteins (Chatterjee and Fisher, 2000; Roy et al., 2003). RGS4 cDNA (GenBank accession number NM017214) was amplified by RT-PCR from rat brain total RNA. The primers used for PCR were 5'-CCGGATCCCACAGTTAAACAAGATGTGC and 5'-CCGCGGCCGCTGTGTG AGAATTAGGCACAC. The PCR product was then cloned to PCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and further subcloned to pcDNA3.1 and pEGFP-C2 vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) to get GFP-tagged RGS4. Transfection of GFP or GFP-tagged RGS4 constructs to primary cultured PFC neurons was conducted with Lipofectamine 2000 reagents (Invitrogen). Two to three days after transfection, electrophysiological recordings were performed on GFP-positive neurons.

Immunocytochemical Staining. Neurons grown on coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature and then washed three times with PBS. Neurons were then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min, followed by 1-h incubation with 5% BSA to block nonspecific staining. Neurons were then incubated with anti-RGS4 antibody (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 4°C overnight. After washing off the nonbinding primary antibodies, the cells were incubated with a rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody (1:200; Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing in PBS three times, the coverslips were mounted on slides with mounting media. Fluorescent images were obtained using a 40x objective with a cooled charge-coupled device camera mounted on a Nikon microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Western Blotting. Procedures were similar to those described previously (Gu and Yan, 2004). Primary antibodies used for blotting include anti-RGS4 (1:2000; Abcam), anti-NR1 (1:5000; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti-NR2A (1:1000; Upstate), anti-NR2B (1:1000; Upstate) and anti-actin (1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Quantification was obtained from densitometric measurements of immunoreactive bands on films using NIH Image software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/).

Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR and Single-Cell RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated from rat PFC using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with DNase I (Invitrogen) to remove genomic DNA. Then SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) was used to obtain cDNA from the tissue mRNA, followed by the treatment with RNase H (2 U/µl) for 20 min at 37°C. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was carried out using the iCycler iQ Real-Time PCR Detection System and iQ Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, GAPDH was used as the housekeeping gene for quantitation of the expression of target genes (RGS4 and 5-HT_1A) in samples from saline- versus PCP-treated rats. -Fold changes in the target gene relative to the GAPDH endogenous control gene was determined by: -Fold change = 2^–(C_T), where C_T = C_{T, target} – C_{T, GAPDH}, and (C_T) =C_{T, PCP} –C_{T, saline}. C_T (threshold cycle) is defined as the fractional cycle number at which the fluorescence reaches 10x the S.D. of the baseline. The primers used for RGS4 were 5'-TGCAGGCAACAAAAGAGGTGAA and 5'-CCCCGCAGCTGGAAGGAT (192 bp); for 5-HT_1A, 5'-TCTGTACCAGGTGCTCAACAAG and 5'-AGAGGAAGGTGCTCTTTGGAGT (638 bp); and for GAPDH, 5'-GATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG and 5'-GGTGCAGCGAACTTTATTGATGGT (440 bp). A total reaction mixture of 20 µl was amplified in a 96-well thin-walled PCR plate (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using the following PCR cycling parameters: 95°C for 5 min followed by 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s. PCR products were detected with 2% agarose gels. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed in duplicate reactions.

Single-cell RT-PCR was performed as described previously (Yan and Surmeier, 1997; Feng et al., 2001). In brief, single neuron was aspirated into the electrode (containing 5 µl of sterile recording solution) by negative pressure after recording. After aspiration, the tip of the electrode was broken, and contents were ejected into 0.5-ml Eppendorf tube containing 3 µl of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water, 1 µl oligo(dT) (0.5 µg/µl), 0.5 µl of RNAsin (40 U/µl), 0.5 µl of dithiothreitol (0.1 M). The mixture was heated to 70°C for 10 min and then incubated on ice for 1 min. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from the single-cell mRNA by adding Superscript III RT (1 µl of 200 U/µl), 2 µl of buffer (10x), 1 µl of dithiothreitol (0.1 M), 1 µl of dNTPs (10 mM each), and 4 µl of MgCl₂ (25 mM). The mixture was then incubated at 42°C for 50 min and terminated by heating the mixture to 70°C for 15 min and then icing. The RNA strand was removed by adding 1 µl of RNase H (2 U/µl) and incubated for 20 min at 37°C. The cDNA was then subjected to 45 cycles of PCR amplification. Quantitation was performed as described above.

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Selective Modulation of the 5-HT_1A Effect on NMDAR Function by RGS4 in PFC Neurons. To test the impact of RGS4 on serotonin or dopamine signaling, we examined the influence of RGS4 on serotonin or dopamine receptor-mediated regulation of NMDAR function. To do so, we infused an anti-RGS4 antibody into neurons through the recording pipette to achieve an effective inhibition of RGS4 function and then tested whether the RGS4 antibody could affect 5-HT_1A or D₄ regulation of NMDAR-mediated synaptic transmission (Wang et al., 2003; Yuen et al., 2005). We first used the anti-RGS4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) raised against the highly specific N terminus of RGS4, which has been shown to recognize recombinant RGS4 in transfected cell lines (Wang et al., 1998) and affect GPCR regulation of voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels in neurons (Diverse-Pierluissi et al., 1999). As shown in Fig. 1, A and B, bath application of the 5-HT_1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (20 µM) reduced the amplitude of NMDAR-EPSC in a reversible manner in PFC slices. When anti-RGS4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was included in recording pipette, 8-OH-DPAT caused a substantially bigger reduction of NMDAR-EPSC. Although the RGS4 antibody caused a significant increase (70%) in the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on NMDAR-EPSC (Fig. 1C), it did not alter the reduction of NMDAR-EPSC by the dopamine D₄ receptor agonist PD168077 (20 µM) in PFC slices (control, 36.8 ± 5.9%, n = 10; with RGS4 antibody, 37.3 ± 6.6%, n = 8).

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Blocking RGS4 function potentiated 5-HT1A regulation of NMDAR-mediated synaptic responses in PFC slices. A and D, plot of normalized peak NMDAR-EPSCs showing the effect of 8-OH-DPAT (a selective 5-HT1A agonist, 20 µM) on the amplitude of evoked NMDAR-EPSC with different RGS antibodies included in the recording pipette. B, representative current traces taken from the records used to construct A (at time points denoted by #). Scale bars: 50 pA, 100 ms. C, cumulative data (mean ± S.E.M.) showing the percentage reduction of NMDAR-EPSC by 8-OH-DPAT or PD168077 (a selective D4 agonist, 20 µM) with or without injection of anti-RGS4 (Santa Cruz). E, cumulative data (mean ± S.E.M.) showing the percentage reduction of NMDAR-EPSC by 8-OH-DPAT in a sample of neurons loaded with different RGS antibodies. *, p < 0.001, ANOVA.

To confirm the specific RGS4 regulation of 5-HT_1A effects on NMDA receptors, we further examined the involvement of RGS4 in 5-HT_1A or D₄ regulation of NMDA (100 µM)-evoked ionic current in dissociated PFC pyramidal neurons (Wang et al., 2003; Yuen et al., 2005). As shown in Fig. 2, A and B, bath application of 8-OH-DPAT (20 µM) reduced the amplitude of NMDAR current, whereas in the neuron dialyzed with anti-RGS4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), the regulation of NMDAR current by 8-OH-DPAT was substantially enhanced. By contrast, bath application of PD168077 (20 µM) reduced the amplitude of NMDAR current to a similar extent with or without anti-RGS4 (Fig. 2C; control, 15.2 ± 2.3%, n = 14; with RGS4 antibody, 15.3 ± 2.9%, n = 12), suggesting the lack of involvement of RGS4 in regulating D₄ signaling. The basal NMDAR current was not altered by anti-RGS4 (control cells, 1235 ± 273 pA, n = 14; anti-RGS4-dialyzed cells, 1256 ± 288 pA, n = 12). As summarized in Fig. 2D, all three RGS4 antibodies caused a significant increase (40–50%) in the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on NMDAR current (control, 19.3 ± 2.5%, n = 42; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 28.6 ± 4.9%, n = 32; Abcam, 27.5 ± 4.6%, n = 22; U1079, 26.7 ± 5.1%, n = 18; p < 0.001, ANOVA), whereas the heat-inactivated RGS4, RGS2, or RGS6/7 antibody failed to change the 8-OH-DPAT effect on NMDAR current (inactive anti-RGS4, 19.9 ± 2.8%, n = 18; anti-RGS2, 20.1 ± 3.3%, n = 12; anti-RGS6/7, 18.5 ± 2.9%, n = 12). Taken together, these results suggest that RGS4 is specifically involved in regulating cortical serotonin signaling.

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Blocking RGS4 function enhanced 5-HT1A regulation of NMDAR-mediated ionic current in acutely dissociated PFC pyramidal neurons. A and C, plot of normalized peak NMDAR current showing the effect of 8-OH-DPAT (20 µM, A) or PD168077 (20 µM, C) on NMDA (100 µM)-elicited current in representative PFC neurons with or without RGS4 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) included in the recording pipette. B, representative current traces taken from the records used to construct A (at time points denoted by #). Scale bars, 0.2 nA, 0.5 s. D, cumulative data (mean ± S.E.M.) showing the percentage reduction of whole-cell NMDAR current by 8-OH-DPAT in a sample of neurons loaded with different RGS antibodies. *, p < 0.001, ANOVA.

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. RGS4 overexpression suppressed 5-HT1A regulation of NMDAR current in cultured PFC neurons. A and B, immunocytochemical staining showing enhanced RGS4 expression in neurons transfected with the GFP-fused RGS4 (A) and normal RGS4 expression in neurons transfected with GPF alone (B). Arrows indicate GFP-positive neurons, and arrowheads indicate GFP-negative neurons. C, plot of normalized peak NMDAR current showing the effect of 8-OH-DPAT in representative GFP-positive neurons transfected with GFP alone or GFP-fused RGS4. D, representative current traces taken from the records used to construct C (at time points denoted by #). Scale bars, 0.2 nA, 1 s. E, cumulative data (mean ± S.E.M.) showing the percentage reduction of NMDAR current by 8-OH-DPAT or PD168077 in nontransfected (NT) neurons or neurons transfected with GFP alone or GFP-fused RGS4. , p < 0.005, ANOVA.

Enhanced 5-HT_1A Regulation of NMDAR Function in PFC Neurons from PCP-Treated Rats. To test whether aberrant RGS4 and serotonin signaling could be implicated in schizophrenia, we examined these molecules in rats with systemic administration of PCP (Jentsch and Roth, 1999), which represents a more thorough model of schizophrenia than other existing pharmacological or genetic models (Gainetdinov et al., 2001). The 5-HT_1A modulation of NMDAR-EPSC in PFC slices was first tested in PFC neurons from rats after subchronic PCP exposure (i.p. for 7 days). As shown Fig. 4, A and B, neurons from PCP-treated rats showed two different kinds of response to 8-OH-DPAT. Significantly (p < 0.001, ANOVA) enhanced 8-OH-DPAT inhibition of NMDAR-EPSC (63.3 ± 4.5%, n = 10) was observed in 36% of the total PFC neurons we tested (n = 28) from PCP-treated rats, compared with the effect of 8-OH-DPAT in neurons from saline-treated rats (36.0 ± 8.8%, n = 28). In the remaining 64% of neurons from PCP-treated rats, the 8-OH-DPAT effect on NMDAR-EPSC was unaltered (38.2 ± 6.5%, n = 18). No obvious differences in morphology or electrophysiological features (e.g., NMDAR-EPSC amplitude, holding current, and input resistance) were observed between the two groups of neurons showing distinct responses to 8-OH-DPAT (data not shown).

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. PCP administration enhanced the 5-HT1A effect on NMDA receptors in a subset of PFC pyramidal neurons. A and C, plot of distribution of the percentage reduction of NMDAR-EPSC (A) or whole-cell NMDAR current (C) by 8-OH-DPAT in PFC neurons from saline- or PCP-treated (3 mg/kg i.p. for 7 days) rats. Note that two groups of cells from PCP-treated rats responded differently to 8-OH-DPAT. B and D, plot of normalized peak NMDAR-EPSCs (B) or whole-cell NMDAR current (D) showing the effect of 8-OH-DPAT in representative neurons from saline-treated rats or the subset of neurons from PCP-treated rats with enhanced 8-OH-DPAT effects. E, cumulative data (mean ± S.E.M.) showing the percentage reduction of NMDAR current by 8-OH-DPAT in neurons from saline- or PCP-treated rats with or without the RGS4 antibody included in recording pipette. Note that the effects of 8-OH-DPAT in neurons from PCP-treated rats are analyzed separately for the two distinct groups. *, p < 0.001, ANOVA. F, plot of distribution of the percentage reduction of NMDAR current by 8-OH-DPAT after different periods of PCP treatment.

We further examined the effect of PCP treatment on 5-HT_1A regulation of NMDAR current in dissociated PFC neurons. As shown in Fig. 4C, neurons from PCP-treated rats also exhibited two different kinds of response to 8-OH-DPAT. In 35% of the total PFC neurons we examined (n = 40) from PCP-treated rats (i.p. for 7 days), significantly (p < 0.001, ANOVA) enhanced 8-OH-DPAT modulation of NMDAR current (31.9 ± 4.2%, n = 14) was observed, compared with neurons from saline-treated rats (19.4 ± 2.8%, n = 30). In the remaining 65% of neurons from PCP-treated rats, the 8-OH-DPAT modulation of NMDAR current was normal (19.5 ± 3.3%, n = 26). Representative cells from saline-treated rats and from PCP-treated rats with the enhanced 8-OH-DPAT effect are shown in Fig. 4D.

We then examined whether RGS4 was involved in the enhanced 5-HT_1A effect on NMDR current in a subset of neurons from PCP-treated rats. As shown in Fig. 4E, when the RGS4 antibody was included in recording pipette, all neurons from PCP-treated rats showed significantly (p < 0.001, ANOVA) potentiated responses to 8-OH-DPAT, reducing NMDAR current by 31.1 ± 6.3% (n = 28). This RGS4 antibody-induced increase (60%) in the 5-HT_1A effect was comparable with the increase (64%) seen in the subset of neurons from PCP-treated rats with enhanced responses when no RGS4 antibody was infused. These results suggest that the effect of the RGS4 antibody is occluded in those neurons from PCP-treated rats with enhanced 5-HT_1A responses.

To test the length of PCP treatment needed to induce the potentiated 5-HT_1A effect on NMDR current, we examined rats with different durations of PCP exposure. As shown in Fig. 4F, the 8-OH-DPAT modulation of NMDAR current was not altered after 1 (n = 20) or 3 days (n = 20) of PCP administration but was significantly changed after 7 (n = 40) or 14 days (n = 20). Taken together, these data suggest that subchronic PCP treatment in a population of PFC pyramidal neurons causes potentiated serotonin signaling.

Decreased RGS4 Expression in PFC Neurons after PCP Treatment. To further confirm the involvement of RGS4 in the enhanced 5-HT_1A signaling after PCP treatment, we examined the changes of RGS4 expression in PCP-treated rats. As shown in Fig. 5, A and B, RGS4 protein levels detected with Western blotting were significantly lower in PFC slices from rats exposed to PCP for 7 days (72 ± 12% of control, n = 10) or 14 days (68 ± 11% of control, n = 8), compared with saline-treated rats, whereas there was no change from rats treated with PCP for 1 day (98 ± 11% of control, n = 8) or 3 days (96 ± 13% of control, n = 8). The time course of RGS4 expressional changes coincided with the onset of 5-HT_1A functional changes, both occurred after 7 days but not 3 days of PCP exposure. Moreover, we examined the expression of NMDA receptors in PCP-treated rats. No significant changes in the protein levels of NMDAR subunits, such as NR1, NR2A, or NR2B, could be observed in PFC from rats exposed to different durations of PCP (Fig. 5, A and B). In addition, no change in RGS4 protein levels was found in other brain areas, including striatum, hippocampus, and cerebellum (Fig. 5C). These results indicate that subchronic PCP treatment induces a selective loss of RGS4 expression in PFC.

View larger version (37K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. PCP administration selectively reduced the RGS4 protein level in PFC. A, Western blots showing the protein levels of RGS4, NR1, NR2A, and NR2B in PFC slices from saline- or PCP-treated (3 mg/kg, i.p. for 7 days) rats. B, quantitative analysis showing that the RGS4 protein level was significantly lower after PCP administration, whereas the protein levels of NR1, NR2A, and NR2B had no significant changes. *, p < 0.001, ANOVA. C, Western blot showing the protein levels of RGS4 and actin in striatum, hippocampus, and cerebellum from saline- (s) or PCP-treated rats (3 mg/kg i.p. for 7 days).

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. PCP administration reduced RGS4 mRNA level in the subset of PFC neurons showing enhanced 5-HT1A signaling. A, agarose gel electrophoresis showing RT-PCR products of RGS4, 5-HT1A receptor and GAPDH in PFC areas from saline-treated (s) or PCP-treated (p) rats (3 mg/kg, i.p. for 7 days). B, plot of normalized semiquantitative RT-PCR results showing mRNA levels of RGS4, 5-HT1A, and GAPDH in PFC from saline- (s) or PCP-treated (p) rats. C, agarose gel electrophoresis showing single-cell RT-PCR products of RGS4 in neurons from saline- or PCP-treated rats with (+) or without (–) enhanced 8-OH-DPAT effects on NMDAR current. D, plot of normalized single-cell RT-PCR results showing that the RGS4 mRNA level was significantly reduced in those cells from PCP-treated rats with enhanced responses to 8-OH-DPAT (+), but not in those neurons without enhanced effects of 8-OH-DPAT (–). *, p < 0.001, ANOVA.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Although several neurotransmitter systems, including dopamine, serotonin, glutamate, and GABA, are implicated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia (Carlsson et al., 2001), putative susceptibility genes with no obvious direct functional links to these systems are emerging (Harrison and Owen, 2003). Elucidating the interaction among these contributing factors is of great importance to understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. It is speculated that these susceptibility genes may converge functionally upon the risk of schizophrenia via influencing synaptic plasticity of cortical circuitry, which is controlled by NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate transmission (Harrison and Weinberger, 2005). Given the key involvement of aberrant NMDAR signaling in schizophrenia (Tsai and Coyle, 2002), it is thought that dys-regulation of NMDA receptors underlies the major action of plausible susceptibility genes for this disease (Moghaddam, 2003). In the present study, we provide evidence showing that one of the genes linked to schizophrenia, RGS4, is selectively involved in the negative control of the 5-HT_1A regulation of NMDAR function in PFC pyramidal neurons. Moreover, in the PCP model of schizophrenia, activation of 5-HT_1A receptors abnormally inhibits NMDAR current in a subset of PFC neurons, which is associated with the diminished expression of RGS4 in these cells. Thus, these results have demonstrated a functional interaction among RGS4, 5-HT_1A, and NMDA signaling in PFC neurons and the potential aberrations of this interaction in schizophrenia.

GPCR signaling pathways, which mediate intracellular responses to extracellular stimuli, need to be tightly regulated. The RGS protein provides a key mechanism for short-term regulation of G proteins (Vries et al., 2000). RGS4 was initially shown to negatively regulate GPCR signaling by accelerating the rate of GTP hydrolysis through the G_i subfamily of G protein subunits (Berman et al., 1996). Later, RGS4 was found to be relatively promiscuous, attenuating both G_i-mediated inhibition of cAMP synthesis and G_q-mediated activation of phospholipase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation via serving as a GTPase-activating protein and/or an effector antagonist (Hepler et al., 1997; Huang et al., 1997; Yan et al., 1997). However, most of the studies were in vitro assays in cell lines overexpressing RGS4 along with certain receptors and G protein subunits. The specificity of endogenous RGS proteins for different GPCR signaling pathways may be different in native neurons. In this study, we found that 5-HT_1A and D₄ receptors, both of which couple to G_i-mediated signaling to regulate NMDA receptors (Wang et al., 2003; Yuen et al., 2005), are differentially influenced by RGS4 in prefrontal cortical neurons. The selective coupling of RGS4 to 5-HT_1A signaling is consistent with previous reports showing that RGS4 attenuates G_i-mediated cAMP production in 5-HT_1A, but not dopamine D₂, receptor-expressing cell lines (Ghavami et al., 2004), and RGS4 is involved in 5-HT_1A-mediated neurotransmitter release (Beyer et al., 2004). Because RGS4 is capable of discriminating between specific G_q-coupled receptors (Xu et al., 1999), we speculate that different specificity of RGS4 in regulating 5-HT_1A versus D₄/D₂ signaling is probably conferred by distinct interaction of the N-terminal domain of RGS4 with these receptor complexes. The detailed mechanisms underlying the preference of RGS4 for serotonin signaling await to be further investigated.

RGS4 is associated with schizophrenia susceptibility (Harrison and Owen, 2003), so it is important to know whether RGS4 aberration occurs in the pathological condition. Given the preferential link of RGS4 to serotonin signaling, we first examined the 5-HT_1A regulation of NMDA receptors in the PCP model of schizophrenia. It is noteworthy that a significant potentiation (65–75%) of the 5-HT_1A regulation of NMDAR current was found in a subpopulation (1/3) of PFC neurons from rats with subchronic (>7 days) PCP treatment. Because RGS4 is specifically involved in the negative control of 5-HT_1A effects on NMDA receptors, we suspected that the potentiated 5-HT_1A regulation of NMDAR current in the subset of PFC neurons from PCP-treated rats could be due to the loss of RGS4 expression in these cells. Indeed, we detected a decreased RGS4 protein level specifically in the PFC area from rats exposed to subchronic PCP. Moreover, blocking RGS4 function with the RGS4 antibody failed to further increase the 5-HT_1A effect on NMDA receptor current in the group of PFC neurons with elevated 5-HT_1A responses, suggesting the lack of endogenous functional RGS4 in these cells after PCP treatment. By using single-cell RT-PCR, we confirmed that the RGS4 mRNA level was indeed selectively diminished in the subset of PFC neurons with elevated 5-HT_1A responses after subchronic PCP exposure. Hence, these results suggest that in the PCP model of schizophrenia, loss of RGS4 expression results in the potentiated 5-HT_1A inhibition of NMDAR current in a pool of PFC pyramidal neurons. This effect of PCP treatment on 5-HT_1A signaling is unique and differs from that on dopamine signaling. We have found that rats exposed to PCP show attenuated D₄ inhibition of NMDAR current as a result of the loss of D₄ regulation of Ca²⁺/camodulin-dependent protein kinase II and unchanged D₁ enhancement of NMDAR current (Wang et al., 2006).

Levels of RGS proteins or mRNAs are tightly regulated by neuronal stimuli, which provides an important mechanism for influencing GPCR signaling pathways (Burchett et al., 1998; Ingi et al., 1998). The specific alteration of RGS4 expression in PFC, a prominent area affected in schizophrenia (Weinberger et al., 1986; Andreasen et al., 1997), hints that RGS4 in PFC neurons may have specialized roles in schizophrenia. The mechanisms underlying this altered prefrontal cortical RGS4 expression in the PCP model of schizophrenia are unclear, but dopamine signaling may play a key role. Previous studies have shown that selective activation of dopamine D₂ receptors with specific agonists causes the upregulation of RGS4 expression in rat striatum (Geurts et al., 2002; Taymans et al., 2003). The functional deficit of dopamine neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia (Lewis and Lieberman, 2000) may cause the downregulation of RGS4 expression in PFC neurons.

Taken together, our study has revealed one of the biological roles of RGS4 in cortical neurons and, more importantly, this function of RGS4 is related to 5-HT_1A regulation of glutamatergic network, which is thought to be important for schizophrenia and antipsychotic drug treatment (Bantick et al., 2001). The alteration of RGS4 expression in PFC and the subsequent change in RGS4 modulation of 5-HT_1A signaling on NMDAR function in the PCP model of schizophrenia provides a potential mechanism for the synaptic dysfunction in schizophrenia (Frankle et al., 2003). It is perceivable that impaired RGS4 function may induce oversuppression of NMDAR response by 5-HT_1A receptors, which could lead to schizophrenia-like behavioral manifestations because of NMDAR hypofunction (Tsai and Coyle, 2002).

	Acknowledgements

 
We thank Xiaoqing Chen for technical support. We are grateful to Dr. Stephen J. Gold for providing the RGS4 antibody U1079.

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants MH63128 and NS48911 and an Independent Investigator Award from NARSAD: The Mental Health Research Association (to Z.Y.).

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.106.032490.

ABBREVIATIONS: RGS, regulator of G protein signaling; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; PFC, prefrontal cortex; NMDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; PCP, phencyclidine; DA, dopamine; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; EPSC, excitatory postsynaptic current; QX-314, (2,6-dimethylphenyl)carbamoylmethyl-triethyl-azanium; ANOVA, analysis of variance; GFP, green fluorescent protein; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; bp, base pair(s); GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; 8-OH-DPAT, 8-hydroxy-2-di-n-propylamino-tetralin; PD168077, N-methyl-4-(2-cyanophenyl)piperazynil-3-methylbenzamide maleate.

Address correspondence to: Zhen Yan, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Buffalo, 124 Sherman Hall, Buffalo NY, 14214. E-mail: zhenyan{at}buffalo.edu.

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Adams B and Moghaddam B (1998) Corticolimbic dopamine neurotransmission is temporally dissociated from the cognitive and locomotor effects of phencyclidine. J Neurosci 18: 5545–5554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Allen RM and Young SJ (1978) Phencyclidine-induced psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 135: 1081–1084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Andreasen NC, O'Leary DS, Flaum M, Nopoulos P, Watkins GL, Boles Ponto LL, and Hichwa RD (1997) Hypofrontality in schizophrenia: distributed dysfunctional circuits in neuroleptic-naive patients. Lancet 349: 1730–1734.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bantick RA, Deakin JF, and Grasby PM (2001) The 5-HT1A receptor in schizophrenia: a promising target for novel atypical neuroleptics? J Psychopharmacol 15: 37–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Berman DM, Wilkie TM, and Gilman AG (1996) GAIP and RGS4 are GTPase-activating proteins for the Gi subfamily of G protein alpha subunits. Cell 86: 445–452.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beyer CE, Ghavami A, Lin Q, Sung A, Rhodes KJ, Dawson LA, Schechter LE, and Young KH (2004) Regulators of G-protein signaling 4: modulation of 5-HT(1A)-mediated neurotransmitter release in vivo. Brain Res 1022: 214–220.[CrossRef][Medline]

Brzustowicz LM, Hodgkinson KA, Chow EW, Honer WG, and Bassett AS (2000) Location of a major susceptibility locus for familial schizophrenia on chromosome 1q21–q22. Science (Wash DC) 288: 678–682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Burchett SA, Volk ML, Bannon MJ, and Granneman JG (1998) Regulators of G protein signaling: rapid changes in mRNA abundance in response to amphetamine. J Neurochem 70: 2216–2219.[Medline]

Cardno AG and Gottesman II (2000) Twin studies of schizophrenia: from bow-and-arrow concordances to star wars Mx and functional genomics. Am J Med Genet 97: 12–17.[CrossRef][Medline]

Carlsson A, Waters N, Holm-Waters S, Tedroff J, Nilsson M, and Carlsson ML (2001) Interactions between monoamines, glutamate, and GABA in schizophrenia: new evidence. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41: 237–260.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chatterjee TK and Fisher RA (2000) Cytoplasmic, nuclear, and golgi localization of RGS proteins. Evidence for N-terminal and RGS domain sequences as intracellular targeting motifs. J Biol Chem 275: 24013–24021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chowdari KV, Mirnics K, Semwal P, Wood J, Lawrence E, Bhatia T, Deshpande SN, BKT, Ferrell RE, Middleton FA, et al (2002) Association and linkage analyses of RGS4 polymorphisms in schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet 11: 1373–1380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Creese I, Burt DR, and Snyder SH (1976) Dopamine receptor binding predicts clinical and pharmacological potencies of antischizophrenic drugs. Science (Wash DC) 192: 481–483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Diverse-Pierluissi MA, Fischer T, Jordan JD, Schiff M, Ortiz DF, Farquhar MG, and De Vries L (1999) Regulators of G protein signaling proteins as determinants of the rate of desensitization of presynaptic calcium channels. J Biol Chem 274: 14490–14494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Erdely HA, Lahti RA, Lopez MB, Myers CS, Roberts RC, Tamminga CA, and Vogel MW (2004) Regional expression of RGS4 mRNA in human brain. Eur J Neurosci 19: 3125–3128.[CrossRef][Medline]

Feng J, Cai X, Zhao JH, and Yan Z (2001) Serotonin receptors modulate GABA_A receptor channels through activation of anchored protein kinase C in prefrontal cortical neurons. J Neurosci 21: 6502–6511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frankle WG, Lerma J, and Laruelle M (2003) The synaptic hypothesis of schizophrenia. Neuron 39: 205–216.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gainetdinov RR, Mohn AR, and Caron MG (2001) Genetic animal models: focus on schizophrenia. Trends Neurosci 24: 527–533.[CrossRef][Medline]

Geurts M, Hermans E, and Maloteaux JM (2002) Opposite modulation of regulators of G protein signalling-2 RGS2 and RGS4 expression by dopamine receptors in the rat striatum. Neurosci Lett 333: 146–150.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ghavami A, Hunt RA, Olsen MA, Zhang J, Smith DL, Kalgaonkar S, Rahman Z, and Young KH (2004) Differential effects of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins on serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, and dopamine D2 receptor-mediated signaling and adenylyl cyclase activity. Cell Signal 16: 711–721.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gu Z and Yan Z (2004) Bidirectional regulation of Ca²⁺/camodulin-dependent protein kinase II activity by dopamine D₄ receptors in prefrontal cortex. Mol Pharmacol 66: 948–955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gu Z, Jiang Q, Fu AKY, Ip NY, and Yan Z (2005) Regulation of NMDA receptors by neuregulin signaling in prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 25: 4974–4984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harrison PJ and Weinberger DR (2005) Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence. Molecular Psychiatry 10: 40–68.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harrison PJ and Owen MJ (2003) Genes for schizophrenia? Recent findings and their pathophysiological implications. Lancet 361: 417–419.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hepler JR, Berman DM, Gilman AG, and Kozasa T (1997) RGS4 and GAIP are GTPase-activating proteins for Gq alpha and block activation of phospholipase C beta by gamma-thio-GTP-Gq alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 428–432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang C, Hepler JR, Gilman AG, and Mumby SM (1997) Attenuation of Gi- and Gq-mediated signaling by expression of RGS4 or GAIP in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 6159–6163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ingi T, Krumins AM, Chidiac P, Brothers GM, Chung S, Snow BE, Barnes CA, Lanahan AA, Siderovski DP, and Ross EM, et al (1998) Dynamic regulation of RGS2 suggests a novel mechanism in G-protein signaling and neuronal plasticity. J Neurosci 18: 7178–7188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Javitt DC and Zukin SR (1991) Recent advances in the phencyclidine model of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 148: 1301–1308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jentsch JD and Roth RH (1999) The neuropsychopharmacology of phencyclidine: from NMDA receptor hypofunction to the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 20: 201–225.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jentsch JD, Tran A, Le D, Youngren KD, and Roth RH (1997) Subchronic phencyclidine administration reduces mesoprefrontal dopamine utilization and impairs prefrontal cortical-dependent cognition in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 17: 92–99.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jentsch JD, Tran A, Taylor JR, and Roth RH (1998) Prefrontal cortical involvement in phencyclidine-induced activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system: behavioral and neurochemical evidence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 138: 89–95.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kapur S and Remington G (2001) Atypical antipsychotics: new directions and new challenges in the treatment of schizophrenia. Annu Rev Med 52: 503–517.[CrossRef][Medline]

Krumins AM, Barker SA, Huang C, Sunahara RK, Yu K, Wilkie TM, Gold SJ, and Mumby SM (2004) Differentially regulated expression of endogenous RGS4 and RGS7. J Biol Chem 279: 2593–2599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Larminie C, Murdock P, Walhin J-P, Duckworth M, Blumer KJ, Scheideler MA, and Garnier M (2004) Selective expression of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) in the human central nervous system. Mol Brain Res 122: 24–34.[Medline]

Lewis DA and Lieberman JA (2000) Catching up on schizophrenia: natural history and neurobiology. Neuron 28: 325–334.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lieberman JA, Mailman RB, Duncan G, Sikich L, Chakos M, Nichols DE, and Kraus JE (1998) Serotonergic basis of antipsychotic drug effects in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 44: 1099–1117.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meltzer HY (1999) The role of serotonin in antipsychotic drug action. Neuropsychopharmacology 21(2 Suppl): 106S–115S.[Medline]

Mirnics K, Middleton FA, Stanwood GD, Lewis DA, and Levitt P (2001) Disease-specific changes in regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (RGS4) expression in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 6: 293–301.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moghaddam B (2003) Bringing order to the glutamate chaos in schizophrenia. Neuron. 40: 881–884.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moghaddam B and Adams BW (1998) Reversal of phencyclidine effects by a group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist in rats. Science (Wash DC) 281: 1349–1352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Morris DW, Rodgers A, McGhee KA, Schwaiger S, Scully P, Quinn J, Meagher D, Waddington JL, Gill M, and Corvin AP (2004) Confirming RGS4 as a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet Neuropsychiatr Genet 125B: 50–53.

Neubig RR and Siderovski DP (2002) Regulators of G-protein signalling as new central nervous system drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1: 187–197.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roy AA, Lemberg KE, and Chidiac P (2003) Recruitment of RGS2 and RGS4 to the plasma membrane by G proteins and receptors reflects functional interactions. Mol Pharmacol 64: 587–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sawa A and Snyder SH (2002) Schizophrenia: diverse approaches to a complex disease. Science (Wash DC) 296: 692–695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sesack SR and Carr DB (2002) Selective prefrontal cortex inputs to dopamine cells: implications for schizophrenia. Physiol Behav 77: 513–517.[CrossRef][Medline]

Snyder SH (1980) Phencyclidine. Nature (Lond) 285: 355–356.[CrossRef][Medline]

Stuart GJ, Dodt HU, and Sakmann B (1993) Patch-clamp recordings from the soma and dendrites of neurons in brain slices using infrared video microscopy. Pflueg Arch Eur J Physiol 423: 511–518.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sullivan PF, Kendler KS, and Neale MC (2003) Schizophrenia as a complex trait—evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60: 1187–1192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Taymans JM, Leysen JE, and Langlois X (2003) Striatal gene expression of RGS2 and RGS4 is specifically mediated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors: clues for RGS2 and RGS4 functions. J Neurochem 84: 1118–1127.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tsai G and Coyle JT (2002) Glutamatergic mechanisms in schizophrenia. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 42: 165–179.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vries LD, Zheng B, Fischer T, Elenko E, and Farquhar MG (2000) The regulator of G protein signaling family. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40: 235–271.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wang J, Ducret A, Tu Y, Kozasa T, Aebersold R, and Ross EM (1998) RGSZ1, a G_z-selective RGS protein in brain. Structure, membrane association, regulation by G_z phosphorylation, and relationship to a G_z GTPase-activating protein subfamily. J Biol Chem 273: 26014–26025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang X, Gu Z, Zhong P, Chen G, Feng J, and Yan Z (2006) Aberrant regulation of NMDA receptors by dopamine D₄ signaling in rats after phencyclidine exposure. Mol Cell Neurosci 31: 15–25.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wang X, Zhong P, Gu Z, and Yan Z (2003) Regulation of NMDA receptors by dopamine D₄ signaling in prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 23: 9852–9861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wedzony K, Chocyk A, Mackowiak M, Fijal K, and Czyrak A (2000) Cortical localization of dopamine D₄ receptors in the rat brain—immunocytochemical study. J Physiol Pharmacol 51: 205–221.[Medline]

Weinberger DR, Berman KF, and Zec RF (1986) Physiologic dysfunction of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. I. Regional cerebral blood flow evidence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43: 114–124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Williams NM, Preece A, Spurlock G, Norton N, Williams HJ, McCreadie RG, Buckland P, Sharkey V, Chowdari KV, and Zammit S, et al. (2004) Support for RGS4 as a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 55: 192–195.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xu X, Zeng W, Popov S, Berman DM, Davignon I, Yu K, Yowe D, Offermanns S, Muallem S, and Wilkie TM (1999) RGS proteins determine signaling specificity of G_q-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem 274: 3549–3556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yan Y, Chi PP, and Bourne HR (1997) RGS4 inhibits G_q-mediated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide synthesis. J Biol Chem 272: 11924–11927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yan Z and Surmeier DJ (1997) D5 dopamine receptors enhance Zn²⁺-sensitive GABA_A currents in striatal cholinergic interneurons through a protein kinase A/protein phosphatase 1 cascade. Neuron 19: 1115–1126.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yuen EY, Jiang Q, Chen P, Gu Z, Feng J, and Yan Z (2005) Serotonin 5-HT_1A receptors regulate NMDA receptor channels through a microtubule-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci 25: 5488–5501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. K. Singh, J. Shi, B. W. Zemaitaitis, and N. A. Muma Olanzapine Increases RGS7 Protein Expression via Stimulation of the Janus Tyrosine Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Signaling Cascade J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Emerging concepts from the recent literature Mol. Interv., April 1, 2007; 7(2): 65 - 65. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.106.032490v1 71/4/1030    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gu, Z. Articles by Yan, Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gu, Z. Articles by Yan, Z.