MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on February 8, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.033662


0026-895X/07/7105-1251-1257$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 71:1251-1257, 2007

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.106.033662v1
71/5/1251    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schupp, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schupp, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, M. A.

A Widely Used Retinoic Acid Receptor Antagonist Induces Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Activity

Michael Schupp, Joshua C. Curtin, Roy J. Kim, Andrew N. Billin, and Mitchell A. Lazar

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, and the Institute for Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (M.S., J.C.C., R.J.K., A.N.B., M.A.L); Division of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (R.J.K.); and Department of High-Throughput Biology, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (A.N.B.)

Received December 19, 2006; accepted February 8, 2007


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are transcription factors whose activity is regulated by the binding of small lipophilic ligands, including hormones, vitamins, and metabolites. Pharmacological NR ligands serve as important therapeutic agents; for example, all-trans retinoic acid, an activating ligand for retinoic acid receptor {alpha} (RAR{alpha}), is used to treat leukemia. Another RAR{alpha} ligand, (E)-S,S-dioxide-4-(2-(7-(heptyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2H-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)-1-propenyl)-benzoic acid (Ro 41-5253), is a potent antagonist that has been a useful and purportedly specific probe of RAR{alpha} function. Here, we report that Ro 41-5253 also activates the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}), a master regulator of adipocyte differentiation and target of widely prescribed antidiabetic thiazolidinediones (TZDs). Ro 41-5253 enhanced differentiation of mouse and human preadipocytes and activated PPAR{gamma} target genes in mature adipocytes. Like the TZDs, Ro 41-5253 also down-regulated PPAR{gamma} protein expression in adipocytes. In addition, Ro 41-5253 activated the PPAR{gamma}-ligand binding domain in transiently transfected HEK293T cells. These effects were not prevented by a potent RAR{alpha} agonist or by depleting cells of RAR{alpha}, indicating that PPAR{gamma} activation was not related to RAR{alpha} antagonism. Indeed, Ro 41-5253 was able to compete with TZD ligands for binding to PPAR{gamma}, suggesting that Ro 41-5253 directly affects PPAR activity. These results vividly demonstrate that pharmacological NR ligands may have "off-target" effects on other NRs. Ro 41-5253 is a PPAR{gamma} agonist as well as an RAR{alpha} antagonist whose pleiotropic effects on NRs may signify a unique spectrum of biological responses.


The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and the retinoic acid receptor (RARs) are members of the NR superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors (Germain et al., 2006Go; Michalik et al., 2006Go). PPAR{gamma} is expressed at its highest levels in white adipose tissue and is required for adipocyte differentiation (Chawla et al., 1994Go; Tontonoz et al., 1994Go). Ligands for this receptor, the antidiabetic drugs thiazolidinediones (TZDs), were found to be high-affinity ligands for PPAR{gamma} promoting adipogenesis (Lehmann et al., 1995Go). PPAR{gamma} heterodimerizes with retinoid X receptor (RXR), and RXR ligands can both enhance or attenuate the activity of PPAR{gamma} responsive genes (Yamauchi et al., 2001Go; Hondares et al., 2006Go). In contrast, RAR{alpha} activation by all-trans retinoid acid (atRA), or by synthetic ligands, prevents differentiation of murine preadipocytes (Kamei et al., 1994Go; Schwarz et al., 1997Go). Unlike RXR ligands, which directly bind and activate the PPAR{gamma}/RXR heterodimer, the mechanism by which RAR ligands block this activity of PPAR{gamma} is less clear and is likely to be indirect (Schwarz et al., 1997Go).

To better understand the effects of atRA on adipocyte differentiation, we used Ro 41-5253; originally synthesized by Hoffman LaRoche, it is a specific antagonist for RAR{alpha} with little affinity for RARbeta and RAR{gamma} (Apfel et al., 1992Go). This compound has been widely used to dissect the role of RAR{alpha} in atRA-dependent biological processes (Shang et al., 1999Go; Emionite et al., 2003Go; Higuchi et al., 2003Go; Engedal et al., 2004Go; Lu et al., 2005Go). We were surprised to find that Ro 41-5253 stimulated the adipogenic differentiation of mouse 3T3-L1 preadipocytes as well as a human preadipocyte cell line. This function of Ro 41-5253 is RAR{alpha}-independent. In exploring potential RAR{alpha}-independent mechanisms, we discovered that Ro 41-5253 is, unexpectedly, an agonist ligand for PPAR{gamma}. This finding suggests, among other things, that biological studies that employed this eccentrically pleiotropic ligand may require re-interpretation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell Culture and Differentiation. Reagents were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) unless otherwise noted. 293T and murine 3T3-L1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (U.S. Bio-Technologies Inc., Parkerford, PA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were grown to confluence and induced to differentiate 2 days after confluence with media containing 0.4 µM dexamethasone, 3 µg/ml bovine insulin, and 0.25 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 2 days and for additional 2 days in insulin only. In differentiation studies, IBMX was replaced by either pioglitazone or Ro 41-5253 for the first 4 days. Culturing and differentiation of human preadipocytes from the Simpson Golabi Behmel Syndrome (SGBS) were described elsewhere (Kim et al., 2006Go), and ligands were present for the first 7 days of differentiation. Oil Red-O staining was performed as described previously (Li and Lazar, 2002Go).

Transfections and Luciferase Assay. 3T3-L1 adipocytes and 293T cells were transfected by electroporation (Nucleofector II; Amaxa Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD). Adipocytes were detached from culture dishes with 0.25% trypsin and 0.5 mg of collagenase/ml in phosphate-buffered saline, washed twice, resuspended in electroporation buffer (solution V; Amaxa Biosystems), mixed with 2 µgof pGl3–3xAOxPPRE plasmid, electroporated, seeded into 12-well plates, and incubated for 24 h with compounds as indicated. 293T cells were electroporated with 2 nmol of nontargeting or human smart-pool RAR{alpha} oligonucleotides (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) and seeded into 24-well plates and used for transactivation assays 24 h later. pGal4-hPPAR{gamma}-LBD, pGal4-hPPARbeta/{delta}-LBD, and pGal5-TK-pGL3 were transfected in 293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol and incubated for 24h with compounds as indicated. All transfection were normalized to cotransfected pRL-CMV and measured using the dualluciferase reporter assay (Promega, Madison, WI).

Immunoblot Analysis and Antibodies. Protein were isolated and separated in 4 to 20% SDS polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Invitrogen). After incubation with the primary antibodies for PPAR{gamma} (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), RAR{alpha} (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or the ubiquitously expressed GTPase RAN (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), a secondary horseradish-conjugated antibody (Invitrogen) was added, and an enhanced chemiluminescent substrate kit (Amersham, Chalfont St. Giles, UK) was used for detection.

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction. RNA was purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was generated using the Sprint Powerscript System (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). Primers and probes for adipose protein 2 (aP2), PPAR{gamma}2, and 36B4 for normalization have been described elsewhere (Chui et al., 2005Go; Schupp et al., 2005Go). All PCR reactions were carried out using Taqman Universal Polymerase Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the PRISM 7900 instrument (Applied Biosystems) and were evaluated according to the standard curve method.

Scintillation Proximity Assay for the PPAR-Ligand Binding Domains. The measurement of ligand displacement was performed as described previously (Nichols et al., 1998Go). The radioligands were [3H]rosiglitazone for PPAR{gamma} and [3H]GW2433 for PPAR{alpha} and PPARbeta/{delta} (Xu et al., 1999Go).

Statistical Analysis. Representative results of at least three independent experiments are shown. All results are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicates. Statistical significance was determined using either the 2-tailed Student's t test or ANOVA, as appropriate, and P < 0.05 was deemed significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ro 41-5253 Was an Inducer of Adipocyte Differentiation. Ro 41-5253 was used previously in 3T3-L1 cells to block the inhibitory effect of atRA on differentiation (Kamei et al., 1994Go). We tested the possibility that this compound has enhancing effects on differentiation itself. 3T3-L1 and human SGBS preadipocytes were therefore induced to differentiate into fat cells by exposing them to the hormonal inducers. Using a differentiation mix devoid of IBMX diminished the grade of adipocyte differentiation (Hamm et al., 2001Go) (Fig. 1A). The presence of pioglitazone or Ro 41-5253 could rescue the ability of differentiation as shown in increased Oil Red O staining, PPAR{gamma}2 mRNA expression in 3T3-L1 cells (Fig. 1A), and PPAR{gamma} protein expression in human SGBS cells (Fig. 1B). However, pioglitazone was more efficient than Ro 41-5253 in promoting the adipocyte phenotype (Fig. 1, A and B).


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Ro 41-5253 induces differentiation of mouse and human preadipocytes. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were treated with the full differentiation mix (Mix) or Mix without IBMX and supplemented with either 500 nM pioglitazone, or 500 nM Ro 41-5253. Differentiation was evaluated by phase contrast microscopy, Oil Red O staining and PPAR{gamma}2 expression at day 8 after initiation of differentiation (A). Human SGBS preadipocytes were treated for 14 days with Mix without IBMX and supplemented with 500 nM ligands for the first 7 days. Protein levels of PPAR{gamma} were determined and cells assessed by phase contrast microscopy. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

 
Ro 41-5253 Induced aP2 Expression and Down-Regulated PPAR{gamma} Protein Levels in Adipocytes. To examine whether the enhancing effects on differentiation were mediated by PPAR{gamma}, we measured the expression of the PPAR{gamma} target gene aP2 and PPAR{gamma} protein expression after incubation with pioglitazone and Ro 41-5253 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. PPAR{gamma} levels were shown to decrease upon activation in an autoregulatory manner (Hauser et al., 2000Go). Ro 41-5253, like pioglitazone, significantly up-regulated aP2 mRNA and down-regulated PPAR{gamma} protein expression in adipocytes. Pioglitazone had more pronounced effects than Ro 41-5253 (Fig. 2, A and B).


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Ro 41-5253 increases PPAR{gamma} target gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and down-regulates PPAR{gamma} protein. Day 8 adipocytes were incubated for 24 h with vehicle, 500 nM pioglitazone, or 500 nM Ro 41-5253. mRNA expression of aP2 (as -fold induction over vehicle treatment) and PPAR{gamma} protein expression were measured (A and B). *, p < 0.05.

 
Ro 41-5253 Activated Endogenous PPAR Activity. Consistent with the effects of Ro 41-5253 on adipocyte differentiation and aP2 expression, Ro 41-5253 increased the activity of endogenous PPAR{gamma} on a transfected AOx-PPAR response element (PPRE) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Ro 41-5253 increases endogenous PPAR activity in adipocytes. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were electroporated with either empty vector (pGL3) or a PPAR-response element containing reporter (pGL3–3xAOx-PPRE) and incubated for 24h with vehicle and 500 nM pioglitazone or 500 nM Ro 41-5253 and assayed for luciferase activity. Data represent the -fold induction of luciferase activity over vehicle treatment of the PPRE-containing plasmid. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

 
Ro 41-5253 Activated the PPAR{gamma}-LBD but Not the PPARbeta/{delta}-LBD. 3T3-L1 adipocytes express both PPAR{gamma} and PPARbeta/{delta} (Yan et al., 2007Go). We therefore investigated whether Ro 41-5253 was able to directly activate the PPAR{gamma} or beta/{delta}-LBDs. We transfected the Gal4-PPAR{gamma} and beta/{delta}-LBDs and the corresponding reporter in 293T cells and incubated with increasing concentrations of pioglitazone or the PPARbeta/{delta} agonist GW 610742 (Sznaidman et al., 2003Go; van der Veen et al., 2005Go) and Ro 41-5253.

The RAR{alpha} antagonist potently activated the PPAR{gamma}-LBD but with much less efficiency than pioglitazone (Fig. 4A). Although the concentrations necessary for half-maximal activation (EC50) for both ligands are in the same range, the maximal activation of Ro 41-5253 over vehicle-treated cells was less than 30% of the activation of pioglitazone (Table 1). The full activation of the PPAR{gamma}-LBD induced by 1 µM pioglitazone was consistently attenuated by cotreatment with increasing concentrations of Ro 41-5253 (Fig. 4C). This strongly suggests that pioglitazone and Ro 41-5253 both act via the same PPAR{gamma} activating mechanism. On the contrary, Ro 41-5253 could not activate the PPARbeta/{delta}-LBD (Fig. 4B). We noticed a slight decrease of the basal PPARbeta/{delta}-LBD activity with high concentrations of Ro 41-5253. Accordingly, there was a reduction in the full PPARbeta/{delta}-LBD activation induced by 20 nM GW 610742 by cotreatment with 10 µMRo 41-5253 to 53% (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Ro 41-5253 partially activates the PPAR{gamma}-LBD but not the PPARbeta/{delta}-LBD and competes with TZD for activation. 293T cells were transiently transfected with pGal4-hPPAR{gamma}_DEF or pGAL-hPPARbeta/{delta}_DEF and the pGal5-Tk-pGL3 reporter followed by stimulation with pioglitazone or GW 610742 (black squares in A and B) or Ro 41-5253 (red circles) as indicated for 24 h. Data represent the -fold induction of luciferase activity over vehicle treatment for activation of PPAR{gamma} (A) or PPARbeta/{delta} (B). Transfected cells were incubated with 1 µM pioglitazone and increasing concentrations of Ro 41-5253 for 24 h and assayed for luciferase activity (C).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 EC50 and maximal activation of the human PPAR{gamma}-LBD in transient transfections

Dose response curves from the transiently transfected 293T cells with the pGal4-hPPAR_DEF and pGal5-Tk-pGL3 reporter (Fig. 4) were used to calculate values for the EC50. The maximal activation represents the maximal relative activation of Ro 41-5253 in comparison to pioglitazone (=100%).

 

Ro 41-5253 Activated the PPAR{gamma}-LBD Independent of RAR{alpha}. We next addressed the question of whether RAR{alpha} was involved in the specific PPAR{gamma}-activating property of Ro 41-5253 using a pharmacological approach. 293T cells were transfected with the Gal4-RAR{alpha}-LBD and the corresponding reporter and titrated for activating/repressing concentrations of Ro 41-5253, and the RAR{alpha} agonist AM-580. The strong repression elicited by 500 nM Ro 41-5253 was completely abolished by coincubation with 5 µM AM-580 (Fig. 5A, compare the Ro 41-5253 and the Ro 41-5253 + AM-580 repression). The same concentration of the RAR{alpha} agonist AM-580 had little effect of the pioglitazone—as well as Ro 41-5253—induced activation of the PPAR{gamma}-LBD (Fig. 5B), showing that RAR{alpha} antagonism is not necessary for the activation of the PPAR{alpha}-LBD by Ro 41-5253.


Figure 5
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Ro 41-5253 activates the PPAR{gamma}-LBD in presence of the RAR{alpha} agonist AM-580. 293T cells were transiently transfected with the pGal4-hRAR{alpha}_DEF (A) or pGal4-hPPAR{gamma}_DEF (B) and pGal5-Tk-pGL3 reporter. Cells were treated with 500 nM Ro 41-5253, 5 µM AM-580 (a RAR{alpha} agonist), or both for 24 h. Data represent the -fold repression over vehicle-treated cells (A). Activation the PPAR{gamma}-LBD was measured after 24-h incubation with 0.03, 0.3, and 3 µM concentrations of either pioglitazone or Ro 41-5253 in the presence of vehicle or 5 µM AM-580. Data represent the -fold induction over vehicle treated cells (B). **, p < 0.01.

 

To provide further evidence for the RAR{alpha}-independent mechanism, we depleted RAR{alpha} in 293T cells (Fig. 6A, compare protein levels of cells electroporated with either siControl or siRAR{alpha}). This depletion did not prevent the activation of the PPAR{gamma}-LBD by Ro 41-5253, proving that RAR{alpha} is not involved in the PPAR{gamma} activation (Fig. 5B). On the contrary, it slightly increased the efficiency by which Ro 41-5253 activated the PPAR{gamma}-LBD.


Figure 6
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Ro 41-5253 activates the PPAR{gamma}-LBD in cells depleted of RAR{alpha}. Reduction of RAR{alpha} protein levels by electroporating siRNA control or siRNA RAR{alpha} in 293T cells (A). After 24 h, cells were transfected with pGal4-hPPAR_DEF and pGal5-Tk-pGL3 and incubated for another 24 h with 3 µM Ro 41-5253. Data are shown as -fold induction over vehicle-treated cells (B). *, p < 0.05.

 

Ro 41-5253 Competes with Specific Ligands for Direct Binding to PPAR{gamma}. Because RAR{alpha} was nonrelevant for the PPAR{gamma} activation, we questioned whether Ro 41–5253 directly interacts with the PPAR{gamma} protein. We therefore measured the competition with specific radiolabeled ligands to human PPAR-LBDs by a scintillation proximity assay and calculated the concentrations for half-maximal displacement. Ro 41-5253 was able to bind to PPAR{gamma} and PPARbeta/{delta} with IC50 values in the low micromolar range (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 IC50 of Ro 41-5253 in displacing specific 3H-labeled ligands from hsPPAR isoforms

Ro 41-5253 displaces specific ligands from hsPPAR-LBDs as measured by a scintillation proximity assay. Data represent mean IC50 values of three independent experiments.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we have shown that Ro 41-5253 is a strong inducer of adipogenesis in mouse and human preadipocytes. We provide evidence that Ro 41-5253 can bind and activate PPAR{gamma}, the master regulator of adipogenesis. On the other hand, Ro 41-5253 could bind PPARbeta/{delta} but was not able to activate the PPARbeta/{delta}-LBD Gal4 fusion protein. Using pharmacological and biochemical interventions, we can exclude the involvement of RAR{alpha} in the PPAR{gamma} activating property of Ro 41-5253. Thus, Ro 41-5253 is not only an antagonist for RAR{alpha} but also an agonist for PPAR{gamma}.

Although the potency of Ro 41-5253 was comparable with pioglitazone (Table 1), its efficiency of promoting lipid accumulation, target gene expression, and activation of the PPAR{gamma}-LBD was consistently lower than by using pioglitazone, a full agonist (Figs. 2A and 4A). Although Ro 41-5253 seems to bind the PPAR{gamma}-LBD in a manner similar to that of TZDs, TZD-induced activation could be diminished with increasing concentrations of Ro 41-5253, which is the traditional definition of partial agonist behavior. The exact mechanism for this partial agonism of PPAR{gamma} by Ro 41-5253 may involve selective or reduced interaction with NR coactivators as has been shown for other partial agonists, such as N-(9-Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl)-L-leucine (Rocchi et al., 2001Go), MCC-555 (Reginato et al., 1998Go) and certain angiotensin receptor blockers (Schupp et al., 2005Go).

No known endogenous ligand for NRs has both RAR{alpha}-antagonizing and PPAR{gamma}-activating properties. However, it is intriguing to think of the existence of endogenous pleiotropic ligands, considering the functional antagonism of RAR and PPAR for instance during adipogenesis (Chawla and Lazar, 1994Go; Xue et al., 1996Go). Furthermore, Ro 41-5253, chemically derived from atRA, has no obvious similarity with any synthetic PPAR{gamma} activator. On the other hand, it shares structural elements with arachidonic metabolites, such as prostaglandin J2, that have been shown to activate PPAR{gamma} (Forman et al., 1995Go; Kliewer et al., 1995Go; Yu et al., 1995Go).

Finally, the unexpectedly pleiotropic effects of Ro 41-5253 that we have uncovered indicate that the caution must be applied to the interpretation of effects elicited by Ro 41-5253 and previously attributed to specific RAR{alpha} antagonism. This caution pertains not only to studies of adipogenesis (Kamei et al., 1994Go) but also to many other cell types. For example, several studies have used Ro 41-5253 as an ostensibly specific probe of RAR{alpha} function in breast cancer (Shang et al., 1999Go; Schneider et al., 2000Go; Emionite et al., 2004Go; Lu et al., 2005Go; Toma et al., 2005Go), where PPAR{gamma} is expressed at significant levels, not only in cell lines such as MCF-7, MDA-MB-231. or ZR-75.1 (Kilgore et al., 1997Go; Nwankwo and Robbins, 2001Go; James et al., 2003Go) but also in primary and metastatic breast adenocarcinomas (Kilgore et al., 1997Go; Mueller et al., 1998Go). Ro 41-5253 was able to bind beta/{delta} in the low micromolar range, which adds to the concerns about overinterpretation of its effects as RAR{alpha}-specific in biological systems. Unfortunately, to our knowledge, no other RAR antagonist is commercially available.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Dr. M. Wabitsch (Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Ulm, Germany) for the SGBS preadipocyte cell line.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01-DK49780 (to M.A.L). M.S. was supported by Mentored Fellowship award from the American Diabetes Association, and J.C.C was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases training grants 5-F32-DK070405-03 and 5-R01-DK045780-12.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/mol.106.033662.

ABBREVIATIONS: PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; TZD, thiazolidinedione; RXR, retinoid X receptor; NR, nuclear receptors; atRA, all-trans retinoid acid; Ro 41-5253, (E)-S,S-dioxide-4-(2-(7-(heptyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2H-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)-1-propenyl)-benzoic acid; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; SGBS, Simpson Golabi Behmel Syndrome; LBD, ligand binding domain; aP2, adipose protein 2; GW2433, 2-(4-{3-[1-[2-(2-chloro-6-fluoro-phenyl)-ethyl]-3-(2,3-dichloro-phenyl)-ureido]-propyl}-phenoxy)-2-methyl-propionic acid; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor response element; AM-580, 4-[(5,5,8,8-tetramethyl6,7-dihydronaphthalene-2-carbonyl)amino]benzoic acid.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Mitchell A. Lazar, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 611 CRB, 415 Ci Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6149. E-mail: lazar{at}mail.med.upenn.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Apfel C, Bauer F, Crettaz M, Forni L, Kamber M, Kaufmann F, LeMotte P, Pirson W, and Klaus M (1992) A retinoic acid receptor alpha antagonist selectively counteracts retinoic acid effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 7129–7133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chawla A and Lazar MA (1994) Peroxisome proliferator and retinoid signaling pathways co-regulate preadipocyte phenotype and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 1786–1790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chawla A, Schwarz EJ, Dimaculangan DD, and Lazar MA (1994) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma: adipose-predominant expression and induction early in adipocyte differentiation. Endocrinology 135: 798–800.[Abstract]

Chui PC, Guan HP, Lehrke M, and Lazar MA (2005) PPARgamma regulates adipocyte cholesterol metabolism via oxidized LDL receptor 1. J Clin Investig 115: 2244–2256.[CrossRef][Medline]

Emionite L, Galmozzi F, Grattarola M, Boccardo F, Vergani L, and Toma S (2004) Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance retinoid response in human breast cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res 24: 4019–4024.[Medline]

Emionite L, Galmozzi F, Raffo P, Vergani L, and Toma S (2003) Retinoids and malignant melanoma: a pathway of proliferation inhibition on SK MEL28 cell line. Anticancer Res 23: 13–19.[Medline]

Engedal N, Ertesvag A, and Blomhoff HK (2004) Survival of activated human T lymphocytes is promoted by retinoic acid via induction of IL-2. Int Immunol 16: 443–453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, and Evans RM (1995) 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma. Cell 83: 803–812.[CrossRef][Medline]

Germain P, Chambon P, Eichele G, Evans RM, Lazar MA, Leid M, De Lera AR, Lotan R, Mangelsdorf DJ, and Gronemeyer H (2006) International Union of Pharmacology. LXIII. Retinoid X receptors. Pharmacol Rev 58: 760–772.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hamm JK, Park BH, and Farmer SR (2001) A role for C/EBPbeta in regulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity during adipogenesis in 3T3–L1 preadipocytes. J Biol Chem 276: 18464–18471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hauser S, Adelmant G, Sarraf P, Wright HM, Mueller E, and Spiegelman BM (2000) Degradation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is linked to ligand-dependent activation. J Biol Chem 275: 18527–18533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Higuchi E, Chandraratna RA, Hong WK, and Lotan R (2003) Induction of TIG3, a putative class II tumor suppressor gene, by retinoic acid in head and neck and lung carcinoma cells and its association with suppression of the transformed phenotype. Oncogene 22: 4627–4635.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hondares E, Mora O, Yubero P, Rodriguez de la Concepcion M, Iglesias R, Giralt M, and Villarroya F (2006) Thiazolidinediones and rexinoids induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-coactivator (PGC)-1alpha gene transcription: an autoregulatory loop controls PGC-1alpha expression in adipocytes via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivation. Endocrinology 147: 2829–2838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

James SY, Lin F, Kolluri SK, Dawson MI, and Zhang XK (2003) Regulation of retinoic acid receptor beta expression by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands in cancer cells. Cancer Res 63: 3531–3538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kamei Y, Kawada T, Mizukami J, and Sugimoto E (1994) The prevention of adipose differentiation of 3T3–L1 cells caused by retinoic acid is elicited through retinoic acid receptor alpha. Life Sci 55: PL307–12.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kilgore MW, Tate PL, Rai S, Sengoku E, and Price TM (1997) MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells contain a functional peroxisomal response. Mol Cell Endocrinol 129: 229–235.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kim RJ, Wilson CG, Wabitsch M, Lazar MA, and Steppan CM (2006) HIV protease inhibitor-specific alterations in human adipocyte differentiation and metabolism. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14: 994–1002.[Medline]

Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Willson TM, Patel I, Morris DC, and Lehmann JM (1995) A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83: 813–819.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lehmann JM, Moore LB, Smith-Oliver TA, Wilkison WO, Willson TM, and Kliewer SA (1995) An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma). J Biol Chem 270: 12953–12956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Li Y and Lazar MA (2002) Differential gene regulation by PPARgamma agonist and constitutively active PPARgamma2. Mol Endocrinol 16: 1040–1048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lu M, Mira-y-Lopez R, Nakajo S, Nakaya K, and Jing Y (2005) Expression of estrogen receptor alpha, retinoic acid receptor alpha and cellular retinoic acid binding protein II genes is coordinately regulated in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 24: 4362–4369.[CrossRef][Medline]

Michalik L, Auwerx J, Berger JP, Chatterjee VK, Glass CK, Gonzalez FJ, Grimaldi PA, Kadowaki T, Lazar MA, O'Rahilly S, et al. (2006) International Union of Pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Pharmacol Rev 58: 726–741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mueller E, Sarraf P, Tontonoz P, Evans RM, Martin KJ, Zhang M, Fletcher C, Singer S, and Spiegelman BM (1998) Terminal differentiation of human breast cancer through PPAR gamma. Mol Cell 1: 465–470.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nichols JS, Parks DJ, Consler TG, and Blanchard SG (1998) Development of a scintillation proximity assay for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand binding domain. Anal Biochem 257: 112–119.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nwankwo JO and Robbins ME (2001) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma expression in human malignant and normal brain, breast and prostate-derived cells. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 64: 241–245.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reginato MJ, Bailey ST, Krakow SL, Minami C, Ishii S, Tanaka H, and Lazar MA (1998) A potent antidiabetic thiazolidinedione with unique peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-activating properties. J Biol Chem 273: 32679–32684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rocchi S, Picard F, Vamecq J, Gelman L, Potier N, Zeyer D, Dubuquoy L, Bac P, Champy MF, Plunket KD, et al. (2001) A unique PPARgamma ligand with potent insulin-sensitizing yet weak adipogenic activity. Mol Cell 8: 737–747.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schneider SM, Offterdinger M, Huber H, and Grunt TW (2000) Activation of retinoic acid receptor alpha is sufficient for full induction of retinoid responses in SK-BR-3 and T47D human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 60: 5479–5487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schupp M, Clemenz M, Gineste R, Witt H, Janke J, Helleboid S, Hennuyer N, Ruiz P, Unger T, Staels B, et al. (2005) Molecular characterization of new selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} modulators with angiotensin receptor blocking activity. Diabetes 54: 3442–3452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schwarz EJ, Reginato MJ, Shao D, Krakow SL, and Lazar MA (1997) Retinoic acid blocks adipogenesis by inhibiting C/EBPbeta-mediated transcription. Mol Cell Biol 17: 1552–1561.[Abstract]

Shang Y, Baumrucker CR, and Green MH (1999) Signal relay by retinoic acid receptors alpha and beta in the retinoic acid-induced expression of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 274: 18005–18010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sznaidman ML, Haffner CD, Maloney PR, Fivush A, Chao E, Goreham D, Sierra ML, LeGrumelec C, Xu HE, Montana VG, et al. (2003) Novel selective small molecule agonists for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARdelta)—synthesis and biological activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 13: 1517–1521.[CrossRef][Medline]

Toma S, Emionite L, Scaramuccia A, Ravera G, and Scarabelli L (2005) Retinoids and human breast cancer: in vivo effects of an antagonist for RAR-alpha. Cancer Lett 219: 27–31.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tontonoz P, Hu E, and Spiegelman BM (1994) Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR gamma 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 79: 1147–1156.[CrossRef][Medline]

van der Veen JN, Kruit JK, Havinga R, Baller JF, Chimini G, Lestavel S, Staels B, Groot PH, Groen AK, and Kuipers F (2005) Reduced cholesterol absorption upon PPARdelta activation coincides with decreased intestinal expression of NPC1L1. J Lipid Res 46: 526–534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xu HE, Lambert MH, Montana VG, Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Brown PJ, Sternbach DD, Lehmann JM, Wisely GB, Willson TM, et al. (1999) Molecular recognition of fatty acids by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Mol Cell 3: 397–403.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xue JC, Schwarz EJ, Chawla A, and Lazar MA (1996) Distinct stages in adipogenesis revealed by retinoid inhibition of differentiation after induction of PPARgamma. Mol Cell Biol 16: 1567–1575.[Abstract]

Yamauchi T, Waki H, Kamon J, Murakami K, Motojima K, Komeda K, Miki H, Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Tsuchida A, et al. (2001) Inhibition of RXR and PPARgamma ameliorates diet-induced obesity and type 2 diabetes. J Clin Investig 108: 1001–1013.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yan ZC, Liu DY, Zhang LL, Shen CY, Ma QL, Cao TB, Wang LJ, Nie H, Zidek W, Tepel M, et al. (2007) Exercise reduces adipose tissue via cannabinoid receptor type 1 which is regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 354: 427–433.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yu K, Bayona W, Kallen CB, Harding HP, Ravera CP, McMahon G, Brown M, and Lazar MA (1995) Differential activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by eicosanoids. J Biol Chem 270: 23975–23983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. D. Dietz, S. Du, C. W. Bolten, M. A. Payne, C. Xia, J. R. Blinn, J. W. Funder, and X. Hu
A Number of Marketed Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers Have Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Activity
Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 742 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.106.033662v1
71/5/1251    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schupp, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schupp, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, M. A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics