|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ActivityDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, and the Institute for Diabetes, Obesity, and Metabolism, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (M.S., J.C.C., R.J.K., A.N.B., M.A.L); Division of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (R.J.K.); and Department of High-Throughput Biology, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (A.N.B.)
Received December 19, 2006; accepted February 8, 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(RAR
), is used to treat leukemia. Another RAR
ligand, (E)-S,S-dioxide-4-(2-(7-(heptyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2H-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)-1-propenyl)-benzoic acid (Ro 41-5253), is a potent antagonist that has been a useful and purportedly specific probe of RAR
function. Here, we report that Ro 41-5253 also activates the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
), a master regulator of adipocyte differentiation and target of widely prescribed antidiabetic thiazolidinediones (TZDs). Ro 41-5253 enhanced differentiation of mouse and human preadipocytes and activated PPAR
target genes in mature adipocytes. Like the TZDs, Ro 41-5253 also down-regulated PPAR
protein expression in adipocytes. In addition, Ro 41-5253 activated the PPAR
-ligand binding domain in transiently transfected HEK293T cells. These effects were not prevented by a potent RAR
agonist or by depleting cells of RAR
, indicating that PPAR
activation was not related to RAR
antagonism. Indeed, Ro 41-5253 was able to compete with TZD ligands for binding to PPAR
, suggesting that Ro 41-5253 directly affects PPAR activity. These results vividly demonstrate that pharmacological NR ligands may have "off-target" effects on other NRs. Ro 41-5253 is a PPAR
agonist as well as an RAR
antagonist whose pleiotropic effects on NRs may signify a unique spectrum of biological responses.
is expressed at its highest levels in white adipose tissue and is required for adipocyte differentiation (Chawla et al., 1994
promoting adipogenesis (Lehmann et al., 1995
heterodimerizes with retinoid X receptor (RXR), and RXR ligands can both enhance or attenuate the activity of PPAR
responsive genes (Yamauchi et al., 2001
activation by all-trans retinoid acid (atRA), or by synthetic ligands, prevents differentiation of murine preadipocytes (Kamei et al., 1994
/RXR heterodimer, the mechanism by which RAR ligands block this activity of PPAR
is less clear and is likely to be indirect (Schwarz et al., 1997
To better understand the effects of atRA on adipocyte differentiation, we used Ro 41-5253; originally synthesized by Hoffman LaRoche, it is a specific antagonist for RAR
with little affinity for RAR
and RAR
(Apfel et al., 1992
). This compound has been widely used to dissect the role of RAR
in atRA-dependent biological processes (Shang et al., 1999
; Emionite et al., 2003
; Higuchi et al., 2003
; Engedal et al., 2004
; Lu et al., 2005
). We were surprised to find that Ro 41-5253 stimulated the adipogenic differentiation of mouse 3T3-L1 preadipocytes as well as a human preadipocyte cell line. This function of Ro 41-5253 is RAR
-independent. In exploring potential RAR
-independent mechanisms, we discovered that Ro 41-5253 is, unexpectedly, an agonist ligand for PPAR
. This finding suggests, among other things, that biological studies that employed this eccentrically pleiotropic ligand may require re-interpretation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transfections and Luciferase Assay. 3T3-L1 adipocytes and 293T cells were transfected by electroporation (Nucleofector II; Amaxa Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD). Adipocytes were detached from culture dishes with 0.25% trypsin and 0.5 mg of collagenase/ml in phosphate-buffered saline, washed twice, resuspended in electroporation buffer (solution V; Amaxa Biosystems), mixed with 2 µgof pGl33xAOxPPRE plasmid, electroporated, seeded into 12-well plates, and incubated for 24 h with compounds as indicated. 293T cells were electroporated with 2 nmol of nontargeting or human smart-pool RAR
oligonucleotides (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) and seeded into 24-well plates and used for transactivation assays 24 h later. pGal4-hPPAR
-LBD, pGal4-hPPAR
/
-LBD, and pGal5-TK-pGL3 were transfected in 293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol and incubated for 24h with compounds as indicated. All transfection were normalized to cotransfected pRL-CMV and measured using the dualluciferase reporter assay (Promega, Madison, WI).
Immunoblot Analysis and Antibodies. Protein were isolated and separated in 4 to 20% SDS polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Invitrogen). After incubation with the primary antibodies for PPAR
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), RAR
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or the ubiquitously expressed GTPase RAN (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), a secondary horseradish-conjugated antibody (Invitrogen) was added, and an enhanced chemiluminescent substrate kit (Amersham, Chalfont St. Giles, UK) was used for detection.
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction. RNA was purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was generated using the Sprint Powerscript System (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). Primers and probes for adipose protein 2 (aP2), PPAR
2, and 36B4 for normalization have been described elsewhere (Chui et al., 2005
; Schupp et al., 2005
). All PCR reactions were carried out using Taqman Universal Polymerase Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the PRISM 7900 instrument (Applied Biosystems) and were evaluated according to the standard curve method.
Scintillation Proximity Assay for the PPAR-Ligand Binding Domains. The measurement of ligand displacement was performed as described previously (Nichols et al., 1998
). The radioligands were [3H]rosiglitazone for PPAR
and [3H]GW2433 for PPAR
and PPAR
/
(Xu et al., 1999
).
Statistical Analysis. Representative results of at least three independent experiments are shown. All results are expressed as mean ± S.D. of triplicates. Statistical significance was determined using either the 2-tailed Student's t test or ANOVA, as appropriate, and P < 0.05 was deemed significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 mRNA expression in 3T3-L1 cells (Fig. 1A), and PPAR
protein expression in human SGBS cells (Fig. 1B). However, pioglitazone was more efficient than Ro 41-5253 in promoting the adipocyte phenotype (Fig. 1, A and B).
|
Protein Levels in Adipocytes. To examine whether the enhancing effects on differentiation were mediated by PPAR
, we measured the expression of the PPAR
target gene aP2 and PPAR
protein expression after incubation with pioglitazone and Ro 41-5253 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. PPAR
levels were shown to decrease upon activation in an autoregulatory manner (Hauser et al., 2000
protein expression in adipocytes. Pioglitazone had more pronounced effects than Ro 41-5253 (Fig. 2, A and B).
|
on a transfected AOx-PPAR response element (PPRE) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (Fig. 3).
|
-LBD but Not the PPAR
/
-LBD. 3T3-L1 adipocytes express both PPAR
and PPAR
/
(Yan et al., 2007
or
/
-LBDs. We transfected the Gal4-PPAR
and
/
-LBDs and the corresponding reporter in 293T cells and incubated with increasing concentrations of pioglitazone or the PPAR
/
agonist GW 610742 (Sznaidman et al., 2003
The RAR
antagonist potently activated the PPAR
-LBD but with much less efficiency than pioglitazone (Fig. 4A). Although the concentrations necessary for half-maximal activation (EC50) for both ligands are in the same range, the maximal activation of Ro 41-5253 over vehicle-treated cells was less than 30% of the activation of pioglitazone (Table 1). The full activation of the PPAR
-LBD induced by 1 µM pioglitazone was consistently attenuated by cotreatment with increasing concentrations of Ro 41-5253 (Fig. 4C). This strongly suggests that pioglitazone and Ro 41-5253 both act via the same PPAR
activating mechanism. On the contrary, Ro 41-5253 could not activate the PPAR
/
-LBD (Fig. 4B). We noticed a slight decrease of the basal PPAR
/
-LBD activity with high concentrations of Ro 41-5253. Accordingly, there was a reduction in the full PPAR
/
-LBD activation induced by 20 nM GW 610742 by cotreatment with 10 µMRo 41-5253 to 53% (data not shown).
|
|
Ro 41-5253 Activated the PPAR
-LBD Independent of RAR
. We next addressed the question of whether RAR
was involved in the specific PPAR
-activating property of Ro 41-5253 using a pharmacological approach. 293T cells were transfected with the Gal4-RAR
-LBD and the corresponding reporter and titrated for activating/repressing concentrations of Ro 41-5253, and the RAR
agonist AM-580. The strong repression elicited by 500 nM Ro 41-5253 was completely abolished by coincubation with 5 µM AM-580 (Fig. 5A, compare the Ro 41-5253 and the Ro 41-5253 + AM-580 repression). The same concentration of the RAR
agonist AM-580 had little effect of the pioglitazoneas well as Ro 41-5253induced activation of the PPAR
-LBD (Fig. 5B), showing that RAR
antagonism is not necessary for the activation of the PPAR
-LBD by Ro 41-5253.
|
To provide further evidence for the RAR
-independent mechanism, we depleted RAR
in 293T cells (Fig. 6A, compare protein levels of cells electroporated with either siControl or siRAR
). This depletion did not prevent the activation of the PPAR
-LBD by Ro 41-5253, proving that RAR
is not involved in the PPAR
activation (Fig. 5B). On the contrary, it slightly increased the efficiency by which Ro 41-5253 activated the PPAR
-LBD.
|
Ro 41-5253 Competes with Specific Ligands for Direct Binding to PPAR
. Because RAR
was nonrelevant for the PPAR
activation, we questioned whether Ro 415253 directly interacts with the PPAR
protein. We therefore measured the competition with specific radiolabeled ligands to human PPAR-LBDs by a scintillation proximity assay and calculated the concentrations for half-maximal displacement. Ro 41-5253 was able to bind to PPAR
and PPAR
/
with IC50 values in the low micromolar range (Table 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, the master regulator of adipogenesis. On the other hand, Ro 41-5253 could bind PPAR
/
but was not able to activate the PPAR
/
-LBD Gal4 fusion protein. Using pharmacological and biochemical interventions, we can exclude the involvement of RAR
in the PPAR
activating property of Ro 41-5253. Thus, Ro 41-5253 is not only an antagonist for RAR
but also an agonist for PPAR
.
Although the potency of Ro 41-5253 was comparable with pioglitazone (Table 1), its efficiency of promoting lipid accumulation, target gene expression, and activation of the PPAR
-LBD was consistently lower than by using pioglitazone, a full agonist (Figs. 2A and 4A). Although Ro 41-5253 seems to bind the PPAR
-LBD in a manner similar to that of TZDs, TZD-induced activation could be diminished with increasing concentrations of Ro 41-5253, which is the traditional definition of partial agonist behavior. The exact mechanism for this partial agonism of PPAR
by Ro 41-5253 may involve selective or reduced interaction with NR coactivators as has been shown for other partial agonists, such as N-(9-Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl)-L-leucine (Rocchi et al., 2001
), MCC-555 (Reginato et al., 1998
) and certain angiotensin receptor blockers (Schupp et al., 2005
).
No known endogenous ligand for NRs has both RAR
-antagonizing and PPAR
-activating properties. However, it is intriguing to think of the existence of endogenous pleiotropic ligands, considering the functional antagonism of RAR and PPAR for instance during adipogenesis (Chawla and Lazar, 1994
; Xue et al., 1996
). Furthermore, Ro 41-5253, chemically derived from atRA, has no obvious similarity with any synthetic PPAR
activator. On the other hand, it shares structural elements with arachidonic metabolites, such as prostaglandin J2, that have been shown to activate PPAR
(Forman et al., 1995
; Kliewer et al., 1995
; Yu et al., 1995
).
Finally, the unexpectedly pleiotropic effects of Ro 41-5253 that we have uncovered indicate that the caution must be applied to the interpretation of effects elicited by Ro 41-5253 and previously attributed to specific RAR
antagonism. This caution pertains not only to studies of adipogenesis (Kamei et al., 1994
) but also to many other cell types. For example, several studies have used Ro 41-5253 as an ostensibly specific probe of RAR
function in breast cancer (Shang et al., 1999
; Schneider et al., 2000
; Emionite et al., 2004
; Lu et al., 2005
; Toma et al., 2005
), where PPAR
is expressed at significant levels, not only in cell lines such as MCF-7, MDA-MB-231. or ZR-75.1 (Kilgore et al., 1997
; Nwankwo and Robbins, 2001
; James et al., 2003
) but also in primary and metastatic breast adenocarcinomas (Kilgore et al., 1997
; Mueller et al., 1998
). Ro 41-5253 was able to bind
/
in the low micromolar range, which adds to the concerns about overinterpretation of its effects as RAR
-specific in biological systems. Unfortunately, to our knowledge, no other RAR antagonist is commercially available.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; TZD, thiazolidinedione; RXR, retinoid X receptor; NR, nuclear receptors; atRA, all-trans retinoid acid; Ro 41-5253, (E)-S,S-dioxide-4-(2-(7-(heptyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2H-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)-1-propenyl)-benzoic acid; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; SGBS, Simpson Golabi Behmel Syndrome; LBD, ligand binding domain; aP2, adipose protein 2; GW2433, 2-(4-{3-[1-[2-(2-chloro-6-fluoro-phenyl)-ethyl]-3-(2,3-dichloro-phenyl)-ureido]-propyl}-phenoxy)-2-methyl-propionic acid; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor response element; AM-580, 4-[(5,5,8,8-tetramethyl6,7-dihydronaphthalene-2-carbonyl)amino]benzoic acid.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Mitchell A. Lazar, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 611 CRB, 415 Ci Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6149. E-mail: lazar{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chawla A and Lazar MA (1994) Peroxisome proliferator and retinoid signaling pathways co-regulate preadipocyte phenotype and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 17861790.
Chawla A, Schwarz EJ, Dimaculangan DD, and Lazar MA (1994) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma: adipose-predominant expression and induction early in adipocyte differentiation. Endocrinology 135: 798800.[Abstract]
Chui PC, Guan HP, Lehrke M, and Lazar MA (2005) PPARgamma regulates adipocyte cholesterol metabolism via oxidized LDL receptor 1. J Clin Investig 115: 22442256.[CrossRef][Medline]
Emionite L, Galmozzi F, Grattarola M, Boccardo F, Vergani L, and Toma S (2004) Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance retinoid response in human breast cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res 24: 40194024.
Emionite L, Galmozzi F, Raffo P, Vergani L, and Toma S (2003) Retinoids and malignant melanoma: a pathway of proliferation inhibition on SK MEL28 cell line. Anticancer Res 23: 1319.[Medline]
Engedal N, Ertesvag A, and Blomhoff HK (2004) Survival of activated human T lymphocytes is promoted by retinoic acid via induction of IL-2. Int Immunol 16: 443453.
Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J, Brun RP, Spiegelman BM, and Evans RM (1995) 15-Deoxy-
12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma. Cell 83: 803812.[CrossRef][Medline]
Germain P, Chambon P, Eichele G, Evans RM, Lazar MA, Leid M, De Lera AR, Lotan R, Mangelsdorf DJ, and Gronemeyer H (2006) International Union of Pharmacology. LXIII. Retinoid X receptors. Pharmacol Rev 58: 760772.
Hamm JK, Park BH, and Farmer SR (2001) A role for C/EBP
in regulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity during adipogenesis in 3T3L1 preadipocytes. J Biol Chem 276: 1846418471.
Hauser S, Adelmant G, Sarraf P, Wright HM, Mueller E, and Spiegelman BM (2000) Degradation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is linked to ligand-dependent activation. J Biol Chem 275: 1852718533.
Higuchi E, Chandraratna RA, Hong WK, and Lotan R (2003) Induction of TIG3, a putative class II tumor suppressor gene, by retinoic acid in head and neck and lung carcinoma cells and its association with suppression of the transformed phenotype. Oncogene 22: 46274635.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hondares E, Mora O, Yubero P, Rodriguez de la Concepcion M, Iglesias R, Giralt M, and Villarroya F (2006) Thiazolidinediones and rexinoids induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-coactivator (PGC)-1alpha gene transcription: an autoregulatory loop controls PGC-1alpha expression in adipocytes via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivation. Endocrinology 147: 28292838.
James SY, Lin F, Kolluri SK, Dawson MI, and Zhang XK (2003) Regulation of retinoic acid receptor beta expression by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands in cancer cells. Cancer Res 63: 35313538.
Kamei Y, Kawada T, Mizukami J, and Sugimoto E (1994) The prevention of adipose differentiation of 3T3L1 cells caused by retinoic acid is elicited through retinoic acid receptor alpha. Life Sci 55: PL30712.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kilgore MW, Tate PL, Rai S, Sengoku E, and Price TM (1997) MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells contain a functional peroxisomal response. Mol Cell Endocrinol 129: 229235.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kim RJ, Wilson CG, Wabitsch M, Lazar MA, and Steppan CM (2006) HIV protease inhibitor-specific alterations in human adipocyte differentiation and metabolism. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14: 9941002.[Medline]
Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Willson TM, Patel I, Morris DC, and Lehmann JM (1995) A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83: 813819.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lehmann JM, Moore LB, Smith-Oliver TA, Wilkison WO, Willson TM, and Kliewer SA (1995) An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma). J Biol Chem 270: 1295312956.
Li Y and Lazar MA (2002) Differential gene regulation by PPARgamma agonist and constitutively active PPARgamma2. Mol Endocrinol 16: 10401048.
Lu M, Mira-y-Lopez R, Nakajo S, Nakaya K, and Jing Y (2005) Expression of estrogen receptor alpha, retinoic acid receptor alpha and cellular retinoic acid binding protein II genes is coordinately regulated in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 24: 43624369.[CrossRef][Medline]
Michalik L, Auwerx J, Berger JP, Chatterjee VK, Glass CK, Gonzalez FJ, Grimaldi PA, Kadowaki T, Lazar MA, O'Rahilly S, et al. (2006) International Union of Pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Pharmacol Rev 58: 726741.
Mueller E, Sarraf P, Tontonoz P, Evans RM, Martin KJ, Zhang M, Fletcher C, Singer S, and Spiegelman BM (1998) Terminal differentiation of human breast cancer through PPAR gamma. Mol Cell 1: 465470.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nichols JS, Parks DJ, Consler TG, and Blanchard SG (1998) Development of a scintillation proximity assay for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand binding domain. Anal Biochem 257: 112119.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nwankwo JO and Robbins ME (2001) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma expression in human malignant and normal brain, breast and prostate-derived cells. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 64: 241245.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reginato MJ, Bailey ST, Krakow SL, Minami C, Ishii S, Tanaka H, and Lazar MA (1998) A potent antidiabetic thiazolidinedione with unique peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-activating properties. J Biol Chem 273: 3267932684.
Rocchi S, Picard F, Vamecq J, Gelman L, Potier N, Zeyer D, Dubuquoy L, Bac P, Champy MF, Plunket KD, et al. (2001) A unique PPARgamma ligand with potent insulin-sensitizing yet weak adipogenic activity. Mol Cell 8: 737747.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schneider SM, Offterdinger M, Huber H, and Grunt TW (2000) Activation of retinoic acid receptor alpha is sufficient for full induction of retinoid responses in SK-BR-3 and T47D human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 60: 54795487.
Schupp M, Clemenz M, Gineste R, Witt H, Janke J, Helleboid S, Hennuyer N, Ruiz P, Unger T, Staels B, et al. (2005) Molecular characterization of new selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} modulators with angiotensin receptor blocking activity. Diabetes 54: 34423452.
Schwarz EJ, Reginato MJ, Shao D, Krakow SL, and Lazar MA (1997) Retinoic acid blocks adipogenesis by inhibiting C/EBPbeta-mediated transcription. Mol Cell Biol 17: 15521561.[Abstract]
Shang Y, Baumrucker CR, and Green MH (1999) Signal relay by retinoic acid receptors alpha and beta in the retinoic acid-induced expression of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 274: 1800518010.
Sznaidman ML, Haffner CD, Maloney PR, Fivush A, Chao E, Goreham D, Sierra ML, LeGrumelec C, Xu HE, Montana VG, et al. (2003) Novel selective small molecule agonists for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARdelta)synthesis and biological activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 13: 15171521.[CrossRef][Medline]
Toma S, Emionite L, Scaramuccia A, Ravera G, and Scarabelli L (2005) Retinoids and human breast cancer: in vivo effects of an antagonist for RAR-alpha. Cancer Lett 219: 2731.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tontonoz P, Hu E, and Spiegelman BM (1994) Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR gamma 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 79: 11471156.[CrossRef][Medline]
van der Veen JN, Kruit JK, Havinga R, Baller JF, Chimini G, Lestavel S, Staels B, Groot PH, Groen AK, and Kuipers F (2005) Reduced cholesterol absorption upon PPARdelta activation coincides with decreased intestinal expression of NPC1L1. J Lipid Res 46: 526534.
Xu HE, Lambert MH, Montana VG, Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Brown PJ, Sternbach DD, Lehmann JM, Wisely GB, Willson TM, et al. (1999) Molecular recognition of fatty acids by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Mol Cell 3: 397403.[CrossRef][Medline]
Xue JC, Schwarz EJ, Chawla A, and Lazar MA (1996) Distinct stages in adipogenesis revealed by retinoid inhibition of differentiation after induction of PPARgamma. Mol Cell Biol 16: 15671575.[Abstract]
Yamauchi T, Waki H, Kamon J, Murakami K, Motojima K, Komeda K, Miki H, Kubota N, Terauchi Y, Tsuchida A, et al. (2001) Inhibition of RXR and PPARgamma ameliorates diet-induced obesity and type 2 diabetes. J Clin Investig 108: 10011013.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yan ZC, Liu DY, Zhang LL, Shen CY, Ma QL, Cao TB, Wang LJ, Nie H, Zidek W, Tepel M, et al. (2007) Exercise reduces adipose tissue via cannabinoid receptor type 1 which is regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 354: 427433.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yu K, Bayona W, Kallen CB, Harding HP, Ravera CP, McMahon G, Brown M, and Lazar MA (1995) Differential activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by eicosanoids. J Biol Chem 270: 2397523983.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Dietz, S. Du, C. W. Bolten, M. A. Payne, C. Xia, J. R. Blinn, J. W. Funder, and X. Hu A Number of Marketed Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers Have Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Activity Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 742 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||