|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of Paediatrics, Physiology and Experimental Medicine Program, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronito, Ontario, Canada (K.K., A.I.C., S.U., K.P.T., S.I.); Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Sir Y.K. Pao Centre for Cancer, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, and Open Laboratory of Chemical Biology of the Institute of Molecular Technology for Drug Discovery and Synthesis, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China (B.C.B.K.); and Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita-shi, Japan (K.O.)
Received January 25, 2007; accepted June 28, 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10- to 20-fold in human-intestinal C2bbe1 cells, followed by an increase of CYP3A protein. Hypotonicity, on the other hand, suppressed CYP3A mRNA levels, indicating that physiological isotonic conditions may regulate the basal expression of CYP3A. Similar responses to ambient tonicity were observed in other human-derived cell lines (intestinal LS180 and hepatic HepG2) and human primary colonic cells. The 11-base pair tonicity-responsive enhancer (TonE) is an osmosensitive regulator that is activated by the transcription factor, the nuclear factor of activated T-cells 5 (NFAT5). Luciferase-based reporter assays of 13 consensus TonE motifs within ±10 kilobases (kb) from the transcription start sites of CYP3A showed that only the CYP3A7 intron 2 region (
5 kb downstream from the transcription start site), which contains two TonE motifs (+5076/+5086 and + 5417/+5427), was responsive to hypertonicity stimuli. This observation was confirmed upon cotransfection with an NFAT5 expression vector, small interfering RNA, or dominant-negative NFAT5. Deletion and mutation analyses suggested that the TonE (+5417/+5427) is indispensable for the enhancer activity. NFAT5 binding to the CYP3A7 intron 2 TonE motif was demonstrated with electrophoretic mobility shift assay and in a native cell context by chromatin immunoprecipitation. We conclude that transcription of human CYP3A is influenced by ambient tonicity. The physiological significance of the tonic regulation of CYP3A enzymes remains to be determined.
The human CYP3A genes reside in a cluster on chromosome 7 (Nelson et al., 2004
), and their expression is characterized by wide interindividual variations. Significant coexpression of the major CYP3A isoforms suggests the presence of common regulatory pathways. CYP3A induction by drugs and chemicals is known to be mediated by pregnane X receptor (PXR) (Bertilsson et al., 1998
; Blumberg et al., 1998
; Kliewer et al., 1998
), constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) (Xie et al., 2000
), the vitamin D receptor (VDR) (Schmiedlin-Ren et al., 1997
; Thummel et al., 2001
), and hepatocyte nuclear factor-4-
(Tirona et al., 2003
). In contrast, the regulation of CYP3A basal expression in the absence of an inducing agent is poorly defined, although these nuclear factors and other regulatory proteins, such as CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein and hepatic nuclear factor-3-
(Rodriguez-Antona et al., 2003
), may also play a role. As we were examining the dietary effects on human CYP3A expression, we made an unexpected observation that osmotic environments seem to influence the expression of CYP3A.
In mammalian cells, ambient tonicity affects the function of a transcription factor called tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein, which is also known as the nuclear factor of activated T-cells 5 (NFAT5) or the osmotic response element-binding protein. TonE binding protein/NFAT5/osmotic response element-binding protein (NFAT5 hereafter in this article) is a newly discovered fifth member of the NFAT family of transcription factors (López-Rodríguez et al., 1999
; Miyakawa et al., 1999
; Ko et al., 2000
; Stroud et al., 2002
), which forms an obligatory homodimer and transactivates its target genes via the tonicity-responsive enhancer (TonE). NFAT5 is the only known mammalian transcription factor that responds to changes in osmolality, in which an increase in ambient tonicity provokes NFAT5 translocation from the cytoplasm to the nuclear compartment (Woo et al., 2000
). NFAT5 controls the expression of osmotic stress-response genes such as the sodium/myoinositol cotransporter (SMIT: SLC5A3) (Yamauchi et al., 1993
), and aldose reductase (Ko et al., 1997
). These proteins synthesize organic osmolytes or transport them into the cell, thereby counterbalancing the ambient hypertonic stimuli (Ho, 2006
). Constitutive nuclear localization of NFAT5 has been shown, suggesting a regulatory role under isotonic conditions (Miyakawa et al., 1999
; Woo et al., 2000
).
NFAT5-mediated gene regulation has been examined extensively in kidney, which faces intense osmotic stresses. Its role in other tissues, except for immune cells, is virtually unknown. Gastrointestinal epithelia are exposed to elevated postprandial osmolality (Ladas et al., 1983
; Houpt, 1991
; Kalantzi et al., 2006
). Moreover, the osmotic microenvironment in the liver is also not static but rather is active and dynamic (Go et al., 2004
). Thus the NFAT5 regulation may be present in these tissues. In this regard, it is intriguing that exposures to salt-rich diet in human subjects for several days have been associated with increased presystemic elimination of CYP3A substrates, such as quinidine (Darbar et al., 1997
) and verapamil (Darbar et al., 1998
).
In this study, we have characterized the tonicity-dependent expression of human CYP3A4, CYP3A7, and CYP3A5. In addition, a series of promoter-reporter gene assays were conducted to identify any active TonE in the CYP3A gene cluster. Our findings show that expressions of human CYP3A are highly dependent on ambient tonicity in various cell lines and primary cells. Furthermore, we found that of the multiple consensus TonE motifs within the ±10 kb from transcription start sites of each major CYP3A, only the CYP3A7 intron 2 region harbors an active osmosensitive TonE element, which is responsive to NFAT5.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-MEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Human normal colonic epithelia obtained from 4 white male subjects aged 35 to 55 years (Celprogen) were processed and propagated in the Human Colon Complete growth medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (Celprogen). The primary cultured cells were 95% positive for the epithelial marker, cytokeratin 19, and used for experiments at approximately 70% confluence. Ambient Osmolality Modification. Ambient tonicity was increased up to 450 mOsmol/kg by adding either NaCl or sucrose to the regular culture media, and cells were incubated for 24 h unless otherwise stated. For example, the addition of 50 mM NaCl to the regular media (300 mOsmol/kg) increases the osmolality by 100 to 400 mOsmol/kg. To decrease ambient osmolality, cells were cultured in water-diluted hypotonic media [200 mOsmol/kg; 1:2 (v/v), water/media]. To account for the differences caused by nutrient dilution in the water-diluted hypotonic condition, PBS was used as a diluent [1:2 (v/v) PBS/media] as a second isotonic reference condition in some experiments. Glycerol was used as a tonicity-neutral control, because it readily crosses the plasma membranes without eliciting osmotic pressure.
Real-Time PCR. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Kit (QIA-GEN, Valencia, CA). cDNA was generated using random hexamers and Moloney murine leukemia virus (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System was used for PCR using Taq-Man Universal PCR Master Mix and Assays-on-Demand Gene Expression probes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The 
Ct method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001
) was used to calculate the amplification difference, with Ct value of target genes being normalized to respective GAPDH value. Measurements were done in triplicate and repeated at least three times. Predesigned primers and probe sets are as follows: human GAPDH (Hs99999905_m1), CYP3A7 (Hs00426361_m1), CYP3A4 (Hs00430021_m1), CYP3A5 (Hs00241417_m1), SMIT (Hs00272857_s), NFAT5 (Hs00232437_m1), PXR (Hs00243666_m1), CAR (Hs00231959_m1), and VDR (Hs00172113_m1); and mouse Nfat5 (Mm00467257_m1), Cyp3a11 (Mm00731567_m1), Cyp3a13 (Mm00484110_m1), Cyp3a16 (Mm00655824_m1), and GAPDH (Mm99999915_g1). Primers used in SYBR Green real-time PCR for drug transporter genes are as follows: MDR1 (forward, 5'-cag agg gga tgg tca gtg tt; reverse, 5'-cct gac tca cca cac caa tg); breast cancer resistance protein (forward, 5'-ccc gtt ctg agc ttt ttc ag; reverse, 5'-caa ggg taa ccg cag tca tt); MRP1 (forward, 5'-agg tgg acc tgt ttc gtg ac; reverse, 5'-tcc acc aga agg tga tcc tc); MRP2 (forward, 5'-tga aag gct aca agc gtc ct; reverse, 5'-tcc acc aga agg tga tcc tc); MRP3 (forward, 5'-aca tgc tgc ccc agt taa tc; reverse, 5'-cac act ctg ggg gtc aag tt); MRP4 (forward, 5'-tgt ttg atg cac acc agg at; reverse, 5'-gac aaa cat ggc aca gat gg); OCTN1 (forward, 5'-gac cga gtg gaa tct ggt gt; reverse, 5'-tct tcc tgc caa acc tgt ct); OCTN2 (forward, 5'-ctg gtg gtt cat ccc tga gt; reverse, 5'-agt gga agg cac aac aat cc); OCT1 (forward, 5'-cct gcc tcg tca tga ttt tt; reverse, 5'-acg aat gtg ggg tac agc tc); and GAPDH (forward, 5'-caa tga ccc ctt cat tga cc; reverse, 5'-gac aag ctt ccc gtt ctc ag).
Immunoblotting/Immunohistochemistry. C2bbe1 cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatants containing 50 µg of protein were used for blotting. Nuclear proteins were extracted with Nuclear Extraction Kit (Panomics, Fremont, CA). Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Muntane-Relat et al., 1995
). The NFAT5 antibody (Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO) was used at a 1000-fold dilution. The CYP3A4 antibody (Research Diagnostics, Flanders, NJ), which also recognizes CYP3A5 and CYP3A7, was used at a 500-fold dilution. β-Actin (1:2000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was used to ensure equal loading. For immunohistochemical analysis, after 4-h exposure to hypertonicity (NaCl-induced 400 mOsmol/kg), C2bbe1 cells on glass coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS and incubated with the above NFAT5 antibody at a 500-fold dilution in 5% donkey serum/PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Secondary antibody, Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG, was then used for 1 h at room temperature for visualization with fluorescent imaging microscopy.
Expression Plasmids, Small Interfering RNA, and Reporter Constructs. NFAT5 expression plasmid was made from KIAA0827 clone (a gift from Dr. Nagase, Kazusa Institute, Tokyo, Japan) by digestion with NotI and XhoI and ligated into pTARGET (Invitrogen). Human PXR expression plasmid (pEF-hPXR; Tirona et al., 2003
) was kindly provided by Dr. Kim (University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada). Dominant-negative NFAT5
1–156, which lacks the first 156 amino acids, was derived by in-frame insertion of KIAA0827 cDNA corresponding to amino acid residues 157 to 581 into NotI and BamHI restriction sites of pFLAG-CMV-2 mammalian expression vector (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as reported previously (Tong et al., 2006
). This region of NFAT5 was shown to function in a dominant-negative manner when expressed in transgenic mice (Lam et al., 2004
; Wang et al., 2005
). Small interfering RNA (siRNA) against NFAT5 was prepared as described by Na et al. (2003
); we synthesized siRNA569R (Na et al., 2003
) targeting exon 5 of NFAT5, which was reported to show specific silencing of NFAT5 mRNA and protein. The negative control siRNA was an inverted sequence of 569R (inv569R). In separate experiments, we used a mixture of four siRNAs against NFAT5 (Dharmacon SMARTpool; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lafayette, CO) or control nontargeting mismatched siRNA.
CYP3A7[-9302/+53] and CYP3A4[-10466/+53] plasmids (Bertilsson et al., 2001
) were kindly provided by Dr. Blomquist (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden). The CYP3A7 promoter fragment encompassing -370/+55 of the transcription start site was cloned by PCR from the CYP3A7[-9302/+53] plasmid using cloning primers (forward, 5'-tcc gct agc gca cac tcc agg cat agg taa-3'; reverse, 5'-cat gga tcc tgc tgc tgt ttg ctg ggc tgt-3'). Likewise, the 478-bp CYP3A4 promoter plasmid from -424 to +54 of the transcription start site was generated from the CYP3A4[-10,466/+53] plasmid (forward, 5'-aca gct agc ctg ggt ttg gaa gga tgt gt-3'; reverse, 5'-cat gga tcc tgt tgc tct ttg ctg ggc tat gt-3'). These promoter fragments introduce an NheI and a BamHI restriction site at the 5'- and 3'-ends, respectively, and were inserted into the NheI and BglII sites of the pGL3-Basic luciferase reporter gene vector, thereby destroying the 3'-restriction site (Goodwin et al., 1999
) for subsequent reporter constructs. The 737-bp CYP3A5 promoter fragment (-688/+49 from the transcription start site) (Burk et al., 2004
) was generated from C2bbe1 genomic DNA using cloning primers (forward, 5'-aca gct agc aga tct atc acc aca gag tca gag ggg atg-3'; reverse, 5'-cat gga tcc gct gtt tgc tgg gct gtt tgc ctg g-3'), introducing an NheI–BglII tandem restriction site at the 5'-end and BamHI site at the 3'-end. This was similarly inserted into the NheI and BglII sites of pGL3-Basic vector. The BglII digestion sequence in the tandem restriction site was used for the CYP3A5 promoter-driven constructs.
The fragments of CYP3A7 intron 2 for the deletion/mutation assays were made by PCR from genomic DNA of C2bbe1 cells using the following primers: backbone CYP3A7[+4910/+5590] (forward, 5'-tcg gta cca ggc aga atc aca tgc aaa a-3'; reverse, 5'-gaa gat ctt gag caa tct tac gac att cca-3'); CYP3A7[+4910/+5204] (forward, 5'-tcg gta cca ggc aga atc aca tgc aaa a-3'; reverse, 5'-gaa gat ctc aac aaa gcc ctc act tag ga-3'); CYP3A7[+4910/+5453] (forward, 5'-tcg gta cca ggc aga atc aca tgc aaa a-3'; reverse, 5'-gaa gat ctc tga caa tgg ata acc acc ttta act-3'); CYP3A7[+4910/+5453]mutant (forward, 5'-tcg gta cca ggc aga atc aca tgc aaa a-3'; reverse, 5'-gaa gat ctc tga caa tgg ata acc acc ttt aac tTt Tac ttt cca-3'), where T indicates mutations; and the backbone reverse CYP3A7[+4910/+5590] (reverse, 5'-gaa gat cta ggc aga atc aca tgc aaa a-3'/5'-tcg gta cct gag caa tct tac gac att cca-3'); and CYP3A7[+5088/+5590] (forward, 5'-tcg gta cca gct tat ttc cac agg gcc a-3'; reverse, 5'-gaa gat ctt gag caa tct tac gac att cca-3'). These fragments were inserted into KpnI and BglII sites of the CYP3A promoter-driven reporter plasmids (see above). The fragment of CYP3A7[+4910/+5590] 3'-position was made using primers (forward, 5'-ttc gga tcc agg cag aat cac atg caa aa-3'; reverse, 5'-ctc gtc gac tga gca atc tta cga cat tcc a-3'). They were inserted into the BamHI and SalI sites of the reporter. Other reporter constructs were similarly made and inserted into the appropriate restriction sites of luciferase reporters containing either the respective CYP3A or SV40 minimal promoter. All constructs were confirmed by sequencing (TCAG DNA sequencing facility, Hospital for Sick Children).
Transient Transfection and Luciferase-Based Reporter Assay. C2bbe1 cells were used unless otherwise stated. Cells were seeded onto six-well plates at 0.5 x 106 cells/well. After 48 h, cells were transfected with 0.3 to 0.5 µg of the firefly luciferase reporter plasmids and 0.08 to 0.2 µg of pRL-TK plasmids (Promega, Madison, WI) containing a Renilla reniformis luciferase gene by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). In some experiments, cells were cotransfected similarly with NFAT5 expression vector, hPXR expression vector (pEF-hPXR; Tirona et al., 2003
), siRNA against NFAT5 (569R and inv569R; Na et al., 2003
), a combination of four gene-specific siRNAs (SMARTpool NFAT5; Dharmacon), the dominant-negative NFAT5, or empty expression plasmids. At 24 to 48 h after transfection, cells were incubated in various experimental conditions for another 16 to 24 h unless otherwise stated. SMART-pool NFAT5 siRNA experiments were conducted as follows. Overnight-seeded HepG2 cells at 50% confluence were transfected for 48 h with 32.5 nM siRNA against NFAT5 (siNFAT5) or equal molar mismatched siRNA controls. These siRNAs were earlier suspended in liposome carrier Dharmafect 1,2,3,4 transfection reagent (Dharmacon) at 0.1 µl/nM siRNA concentration in serum-free Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). Cells were then treated with different tonicity for 16 h.
Luciferase activities of the cell extracts were determined using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). Relative luciferase activity was calculated as observed relative light units from firefly luciferase normalized to R. reniformis luciferase values and expressed as ratios to its minimal promoter construct under isotonic conditions, unless otherwise stated. In some experiments, the ratios were further normalized to those of the respective reporter in a control isotonic condition. All experiments were done in triplicate and repeated at least three times.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay. Nuclear extracts were prepared from confluent C2bbe1 cells treated for 4 h at NaCl-induced hyperosmolality (400 mOsmol/kg) using Nuclear Extraction Kit (Panomics) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed using the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) with modifications. A 0.5-pmol sample of the 27-bp 5'-biotinylated probe (+5409/+5435 from CYP3A7 transcriptional start site) was used to detect protein/DNA interaction with 100-, 200-, or 400-fold increase of competitor probes (unbiotinylated) or mutant (tAAaGagA-aG, where capitalized letters represent base changes, and the dash represents a 1-bp deletion from the original "tggaaagttac"). NFAT5 antibody used for supershift was from Affinity BioReagents at a concentration of 2.5 µl per reaction. The binding reaction consists of 10 µg of nuclear extract, 1x binding buffer, 2 µg of poly (dIdC), 3 µg of random primers (Invitrogen), 5 mM MgCl2, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, and 1 pmol of biotinylated probe, with or without the stated amount of competitor or mutant probes, or NFAT5 antibody, at a final volume of 10 µl. Incubation was carried out for 40 min at room temperature for all reactions. The 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was allowed to run for 2 h before transfer to the nylon membrane followed by UV cross-linking (Ultraviolet Crosslinker; UVP, Upland, CA). Detection by chemiluminescence was carried out according to manufacturer's instructions.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was done using the ChIP kit (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). In brief, C2bbe1 cells were incubated under NaCl-induced hypertonic condition (400 mOsmol/kg) for 16 h, and proteins are cross-linked to DNA by 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at 37°C. The cells were then lysed in SDS and sonicated using a probe sonicator to obtain sheared DNA fragments ranging from 200 to 1000 bp. A 200-µl aliquot was taken for subsequent reverse-linking with 8 µl of 5 M NaCl, and the DNA phenol/chloroform was extracted and ethanol-precipitated. A 1% of fraction was used as the input control. Another aliquot of 200 µl was then diluted with the ChIP dilution buffer and incubated with salmon sperm DNA/protein A agarose beads for 1 h at 4°C to remove nonspecific DNA that initially binds to the beads. The supernatant was incubated with 2 µl (1:500) of rabbit polyclonal IgG NFAT5 antibody, CYP1A1 antibody (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as irrelevant target antibody, or no antibody at 4°C overnight, and then fresh beads (60 µl) were added with agitation at 4°C for 1 h. The beads were washed twice according to the buffer systems supplied in the kit, and the protein/DNA complex is eluted with 250 µl of elution buffer (1% SDS and 0.1 M NaHCO3), and only 200 µl of supernatant is collected after 30 min of shaking in room temperature. This step was repeated twice to obtain 400 µl of eluted samples. The samples were reverse-cross-linked with 20 µl of 5 M NaCl for >4 h at 65°C and treated with proteinase K. DNA of the samples was then phenol/chloroform-extracted and ethanol-precipitated using standard techniques. DNA was resuspended in 100 µl of diethyl pyrocarbonate water for subsequent PCR reaction. All PCR reactions were performed in a 50-µl reaction mix using Mastercycler (Eppendorf, Boulder, CO) with 1% template (1 µl). All PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 2 min; 95°C for 45 s, then 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 30 s, for 40 cycles; 72°C for 2 min, except for the NFAT5-coding region (annealing temperature at 55°C, 1 min). The CYP3A7 intron 2 TonE regions were assessed as fragments A and B. Fragment A contains an antisense TonE motif +4688/+4698; and fragment B with a sense TonE +5417/+5427. The primers for fragment A (288 bp) are as follows: forward, 5'-gtc att tgc acc tgc ttg aa; and reverse, 5'-tgc atg tga ttc tgc ctt tg. Those for fragment B (271 bp) were as follows: forward, 5'-aac agg ctt tgt gtg agc aa; and reverse, 5'-atg act tgt tcc tgc cct gt. For positive control, we detected a 194-bp PCR product of the SMIT promoter, which contains an active TonE sequence at -21,622/-21,611 from the start site. This site was originally characterized as TonEp (Rim et al.,1998
). The primers used for SMIT-TonEp site are the following: forward, 5'-cgc gaa ggt ccc tag ctc; reverse, 5'-gac cct gcc tgc ccc tac. NFAT5 coding region (exon 14: the third terminal exon lacking a TonE motif) was used as the negative PCR control (López-Rodríguez et al., 2001
) with the following primers: forward, 5' gtt gcc atg cag agt aac tct; and reverse, 5' cat tgg att ttg att ggg ttg aat atc ctg for an 180-bp product.
Statistical Analysis. Results of mRNA levels are expressed as fold induction compared with isotonic conditions. Luciferase-based reporter activity is shown as ratios to appropriate controls as described above. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M., unless otherwise stated. When appropriate, data were analyzed by the Student's t test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To further characterize the involvement of NFAT5 in CYP3A expression, loss-of-function assays were conducted using two different siRNA approaches against NFAT5: a combination of four different siRNAs against NFAT5 (siN-FAT5: see Materials and Methods), or siRNA569R (Na et al., 2003
). Because conditions could not be sufficiently optimized for C2bbe1 cells in these experiments, we used HepG2 cells. As shown in Fig. 1h, siRNA-mediated knockdown of NFAT5 with siNFAT5 caused significant reduction in CYP3A mRNA levels in both isotonic and NaCl-induced hypertonicity. NFAT5 knockdown using 569R NFAT5 siRNA (Na et al., 2003
) showed a similar tendency under hypertonicity conditions (Fig. 1h, inset), although the magnitude of reduction was milder than siNFAT5. In these experiments, siRNA569R caused approximately 50% reduction of NFAT5 mRNA, and siNFAT5 caused
80% reduction (data not shown). Taken together, these findings indicate that human CYP3A expression is influenced by a tonicity-driven mechanism, possibly involving NFAT5.
CYP3A Expression Parallels Ambient Tonicity in Human-Derived Cells. NFAT5-mediated gene control is bidirectional (Woo et al., 2000
). In other words, levels of target genes increase as ambient tonicity increases, whereas they decrease as ambient tonicity decreases. Changes of CYP3A expression in C2bbe1 cells followed this pattern (Fig. 2, left), paralleling ambient tonicity changes from hypo-(200 mOsmol/kg) to hypertonicity (450 mOsmol/kg). So were other human cells [primary human colon epithelia, a colon carcinoma-derived cell line (LS180), and a hepatoma-derived cell line (HepG2)] (Fig. 2), suggesting that this is probably a universal phenomenon among human cells. Unlike human CYP3A, however, mouse Cyp3a13 mRNA levels changed inversely to ambient tonicity, whereas Smit, an established NFAT5 target gene, showed similar responses in human (Fig. 2) and mouse cells (intestinal CMT93 and hepatic Hepa1c1c7 cells; data not shown). It is unclear whether the tonicity effect on mouse Cyp3a13 represents a system-wide phenomenon in mice or a response specific to Cyp3a13, because other mouse Cyp3a mRNAs were undetectable or were not examined in these cell lines.
|
|
We then examined the remaining 7 TonE consensus motifs within 10 kb downstream from the transcription start site of each of those CYP3A genes (Fig. 3a): two sense TonE sequences in the CYP3A4 exon 3/intron 3 (+6144/+6154 and + 6169/+6179 from the CYP3A4 transcription start site); one antisense sequence in the CYP3A4 intron 2 (+5636/+5646); two sense sequences in the CYP3A7 intron 2 (+5076/+5086 and + 5417/+5427 from the CYP3A7 transcription start site); one antisense sequence in the CYP3A7 intron 2 (+4688/+4788); and one sense sequence in CYP3A5 exon 3 (+5437/+5447 from the CYP3A5 transcription start site). Screening with SV40 promoter-driven luciferase reporters in C2bbe1 cells (Fig. 3a; CYP3A4[+5971/+6352], CYP3A7[+4910/+5590], and CYP3A5[+5318/+5669]) showed that only CYP3A7[+4910/+5590] with the CYP3A7 intron 2 sense TonE sequences resulted in robust responses under isotonic conditions and more so after hypertonicity exposures (data not shown). We then further examined comparable regions of CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 approximately 5 to 6 kb downstream of the transcription start sites (Fig. 3a). The CYP3A4[+5971/+6352] reporter driven by the CYP3A4 promoter, which contains two TonEs at +6144 and +6169, was not responsive (Fig. 3c). Moreover, the CYP3A4[+5403/+6429] construct containing the three TonEs (+5636, +6144, and +6169) did not show activity (Fig. 3c; +CYP3A4[+5403/+6429]). In contrast, the CYP3A7[+4910/+5910] with the two sense intronic TonEs (CYP3A7 +5076 and +5417; see Fig. 3a), driven by the CYP3A7 promoter, was active under isotonic condition and responded to hypertonicity. However, inclusion of the antisense TonE (CYP3A7 +4688) did not modify tonicity-responsiveness (Fig. 3c; +CYP3A7[+4658/+5587]), and the reporter containing the antisense TonE (CYP3A7 +4688) alone was inactive (Fig. 3c; +CYP3A7[+4658/+4909]). These findings indicate that the CYP3A7 intron 2 region containing the two sense TonE motifs (+5076/+5086 and +5417/+5427) has a tonicity-responsive enhancer activity.
Transactivation of CYP3A7 Intron 2 TonE Is Dependent on NFAT5. The CYP3A7 intron 2 region (+4910/+5590) was placed in each of the CYP3A promoters in luciferase constructs and tested for its transactivation activity with and without NFAT5 expression vector cotransfection (Fig. 3d). Results showed that this region is capable of activating all CYP3A promoter constructs in response to hypertonicity or NFAT5 overexpression. Loss-of-function assays were also conducted using the CYP3A7[+4910/5590] luciferase reporter cotransfected with dominant-negative NFAT5 (dnN-FAT5
1–156; Tong et al., 2006
) or empty pFLAG-CMV-2 expression vector (pFLAG). As shown in Fig. 3e, dnNFAT5
1–156 decreased reporter activity in both isotonic and hypertonic conditions (p < 0.01; n = 4). Likewise, reporter activity was examined with siRNA569R against NFAT5 (Na et al., 2003
). siRNA569R significantly reduced reporter activity (p < 0.05, n = 4; Fig. 3e). In these experiments, siRNA569R caused approximately 50% reduction of NFAT5 mRNA (data not shown). Together, these findings suggest that CYP3A7 intron 2 region may work in conjunction with other CYP3A promoters and that NFAT5 is required for enhancer activation.
The TonE Motif at +5417 in the CYP3A7 Intron 2 Region Is Required for Transactivation. Serial deletions of the CYP3A7 intron 2 fragment were conducted to determine the minimal sequence responsible for enhancer activity (Fig. 4a). Compared with the CYP3A7[+4910/+5590] reporter plasmid with two TonE sense motifs, serial upstream deletions showed a gradual reduction in reporter signals. Constructs without the upstream TonE motif (constructs +5088/+5590 and +5361/+5590) still retained the reporter activity, suggesting that the upstream TonE motif and neighboring regions are dispensable but required for a full response. We found that the reporter +5361/+5590 was the shortest construct that responds to hypertonicity or NFAT5. Further deletion (construct +5428/+5590), which is devoid of both TonE motifs, abolished the response. This observation supports that the downstream motif (+5417/+5427) is required in the NFAT5-mediated transactivation. This notion is further supported by the +4910/+5204 construct, in which the upstream motif without the downstream segment was unresponsive. This indicates that the upstream TonE motif and immediate neighboring regions are insufficient for enhancer activity. Furthermore, mutations in the +5417/+5427 TonE motif (tggaaagtAaA; the 2 "A"s in the mutant represent adenine replacing thymine and cytosine, respectively) drastically reduced tonicity responsiveness (Fig. 4b), reaffirming the requirement of the downstream motif for robust enhancer activity. General enhancers have the ability to transactivate promoter constructs independent of their location. To test whether the CYP3A7 intron 2 region has such an enhancer characteristics, it was placed downstream of the reporter gene (+4910/+5590 3'-position). Note that the CYP3A7[+4910/+5490] 3'position reporter construct may mimic actual CYP3A7 promoter–intron 2 DNA configuration to some extent. Results show that this reporter plasmid still retained tonicity/NFAT5 responsiveness, although the magnitude of the response was smaller (Fig. 4b).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data suggest that the increased CYP3A expression is the result of transcriptional activation mediated by NFAT5. Several transcriptional factors, such as PXR and CAR, have been well established in the CYP3A regulation network. It remains to be defined whether the tonicity-mediated CYP3A expression is modified by other transcription factors. Specifically, it awaits further studies to elucidate a hierarchy of these factors in regulation of CYP3A, which determines system characteristics such as additivity, synergism, or antagonism among them. As shown in Fig. 1e, ambient hypertonicity may cause mild alterations in mRNA expression for some of these transcription factors, which may contribute to tonicity-triggered CYP3A induction. However, relatively rapid induction of CYP3A mRNA within 4 h by ambient hypertonicity (Fig. 1a) suggests a direct tonicity-mediated transcriptional induction rather through a secondary mechanism, if any.
Compared with human CYP3A, responses of mouse Cyp3a13 were exactly opposite in the two cell lines tested (CMT93 rectal cells and hepe1c1c7 liver cells), although mouse Smit, a known NFAT5 target gene, responded in the same manner as human SMIT. Tonicity responses of other mouse Cyp3a remain elusive, because only Cyp3a13 was detectable in this study. No orthologous CYP3A pair exists between mouse and human, suggesting a species-specific independent expansion of the ancestral CYP3A gene cassette over the last 75 million years (Nelson et al., 2004
). Rodent and human CYP3A share many regulatory factors such as the PXR and CAR, but distinct species differences still exist. Whether mouse Cyp3a in vivo similarly responds to tonicity remains to be examined.
Mammalian cellular responses to osmotic stresses are mediated by the osmoregulatory transcription factor called tonicity enhancer binding protein (NFAT5) (reviewed by Ho, 2006
). Upon activation by increased osmotic pressure, NFAT5 is translocated to the nucleus and binds to the TonE of target genes. Our NFAT5 siRNA experiments (Fig. 1h) suggest that NFAT5 plays a central role in the tonicity-CYP3A pathway. There are 13 consensus TonE motifs within the ±10 kb from the transcription start sites of CYP3A (Fig. 3a). The present study shows that among these DNA elements, only the 0.7-kb region within CYP3A7 intron 2 has robust enhancer activity, responsive to hypertonicity and NFAT5 overexpression or knockdown (Fig. 3, b–e). Deletion and mutation analyses showed that the CYP3A7 intron 2 TonE at +5417 is indispensable for the minimal enhancer activity, although a full response requires the neighboring region (Fig. 4, a and b). Using EMSA and ChIP assays, we further showed NFAT5-binding to this TonE motif (Fig. 5 and 6). Altogether, our findings indicate specific binding of NFAT5 to the region surrounding CYP3A7 intron 2 TonE at +5417 in a native cell context.
The CYP3A7 intron 2 region containing the responsive TonE site (+5417) placed immediate 3'-side of the luciferase reporter gene (CYP3A7[+4910/+5590] 3'position) to mimic the natural genomic configuration is responsive to hypertonicity and NFAT5 overexpression (Fig. 4b). An enhancer located in the intron 3 of the human tumor necrosis factor-
gene, which interacts with the human tumor necrosis factor-
promoter, has been characterized in a similar experimental approach (Barthel and Goldfeld, 2003
). The magnitude of response of the CYP3A7[+4910/+5590] 3'position, however, was lower than when placed at 5' of the CYP3A7 promoter (Fig. 4b). It is presently unknown whether this quantitative difference is of any biological significance in native DNA context or is simply an experimental limitation in an artificial environment of gene reporter assays.
Our studies show that expressions of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP3A7 are all dependent on ambient tonicity and that the CYP3A7 intron 2 region houses the only TonE consensus motif within the ±10 kb from the transcription start sites of CYP3A. Based on these findings, we speculate that the CYP3A7 intronic TonE segment serves as an enhancer for CYP3A7 and possibly as a long-range enhancer for CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, as seen in some genes including β-globin. Alternatively, there may be unidentified TonEs, or similar enhancers, separately for each CYP3A gene. Involvement of other transcriptional factors in this phenomenon is largely speculative at this point. We think that at least PXR is not involved because overexpression of PXR does not increase tonicity responses of CYP3A mRNA (data not shown) and because xenobiotic-responsive enhancer module-containing 5'-flanking regions of CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 do not respond to tonicity (Fig. 3b). If PXR, CAR, or VDR is involved, lack of tonicity responses in genes such as MDR1 is also difficult to explain. Further studies are required to address these questions.
The implications of our findings are severalfold. First, because NFAT5 shows basal activity under physiological osmolality (Miyakawa et al., 1999
; Woo et al., 2000
), normal osmotic environment may be one of the baseline stimuli for CYP3A expression. This implies that the tightly regulated constitutive osmotic environment provides consistency and stability to the basal transcriptional drive, thereby sustaining CYP3A basal expression. Second, intestinal CYP3A expression may be affected through this pathway by osmolality/tonicity changes within the intestinal lumen as a result of food or fluid intake. Intestinal lumen faces periodic surges of osmolality related to food intake (Ladas et al., 1983
; Houpt, 1991
; Kalantzi et al., 2006
). Therefore, CYP3A mRNA expression in the intestine may increase after food intake, which then elevates CYP3A protein levels. This may explain clinical observations in which human subjects receiving high-salt diets for 7 to 10 days showed significant increase in presystemic elimination and metabolite formation of orally administered CYP3A substrates quinidine and verapamil (Darbar et al., 1997
, 1998
). Third, the mechanism of urine volume control by NFAT5, which is exemplified in dehydration (Lam et al., 2004
), may be supported by an increased CYP3A5 level because of its role in renal Na+ and water retention (Kuehl et al., 2001
; Givens et al., 2003
; Thompson et al., 2004
). Given the potential role of kidney-predominant CYP3A5 in salt retention and hypertension by converting corticoids to 6β-hydroxysteroids with mineralocorticoid action, this pathway is likely to be part of a regulation loop for salt homeostasis. The renal NFAT5-CYP3A5 pathway may be crucial to the hypertension pathogenesis theory associated with genetic variation in renal CYP3A5 expression (Kuehl et al., 2001
).
In summary, we discovered the ambient tonicity-driven, NFAT5-mediated expression of human CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP3A7. Whether the CYP3A7 intron 2 TonEs are responsible for propagation of the tonicity-NFAT5 signal toward all three isoforms of CYP3A awaits further studies.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
K.K. and A.I.C. contributed equally to this work.
This work was presented in part at the annual meetings of the Japanese Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (December 2005, Oita, Japan) and the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (March 2006, Baltimore, MD).
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: PXR, pregnane X receptor; CAR, constitutive androstane receptor; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; NFAT5, the nuclear factor of activated T-cells 5; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; siRNA, small interfering RNA; SMIT, sodium/myoinositol cotransporter; SV, simian virus; TonE, tonicity-responsive enhancer; VDR, vitamin D receptor; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase(s); MEM, minimal essential medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; dn, dominant negative.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Shinya Ito, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8 Canada. E-mail: shinya.ito{at}sickkids.ca
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bertilsson G, Berkenstam A, and Blomquist P (2001) Functionally conserved xenobiotic responsive enhancer in cytochrome P450 3A7. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280: 139-144.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bertilsson G, Heidrich J, Svensson K, Asman M, Jendeberg L, Sydow-Backman M, Ohlsson R, Postlind H, Blomquist P, and Berkenstam A (1998) Identification of a human nuclear receptor defines a new signaling pathway for CYP3A induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 12208-12213.
Blumberg B, Sabbagh W Jr, Juguilon H, Bolado J Jr, van Meter CM, Ong ES, and Evans RM (1998) SXR, a novel steroid and xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptor. Genes Dev 12: 3195-3205.
Burk O, Koch I, Raucy J, Hustert E, Eichelbaum M, Brockmoller J, Zanger UM, and Wojnowski L (2004) The induction of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) in the human liver and intestine is mediated by the xenobiotic sensors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutively activated receptor (CAR). J Biol Chem 279: 38379-38385.
Darbar D, Dell'Orto S, Morike K, Wilkinson GR, and Roden DM (1997) Dietary salt increases first-pass elimination of oral quinidine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 61: 292-300.[CrossRef][Medline]
Darbar D, Fromm MF, Dell'Orto S, Kim RB, Kroemer HK, Eichelbaum M, and Roden DM (1998) Modulation by dietary salt of verapamil disposition in humans. Circulation 98: 2702-2708.
Givens RC, Lin YS, Dowling AL, Thummel KE, Lamba JK, Schuetz EG, Stewart PW, and Watkins PB (2003) CYP3A5 genotype predicts renal CYP3A activity and blood pressure in healthy adults. J Appl Physiol 95: 1297-1300.
Go WY, Liu X, Roti MA, Liu F, and Ho SN (2004) NFAT5/TonEBP mutant mice define osmotic stress as a critical feature of the lymphoid microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 10673-10678.
Goodwin B, Hodgson E, and Liddle C (1999) The orphan human pregnane X receptor mediates the transcriptional activation of CYP3A4 by rifampicin through a distal enhancer module. Mol Pharmacol 56: 1329-1339.
Ho SN (2006) Intracellular water homeostasis and the mammalian cellular osmotic stress response. J Cell Physiol 206: 9-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Houpt TR (1991) Patterns of duodenal osmolality in young pigs fed solid food. Am J Physiol 261: R569-R575.[Medline]
Kalantzi L, Goumas K, Kalioras V, Abrahamsson B, Dressman JB, and Reppas C (2006) Characterization of the human upper gastrointestinal contents under conditions simulating bioavailability/bioequivalence studies. Pharm Res 23: 165-176.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kliewer SA, Moore JT, Wade L, Staudinger JL, Watson MA, Jones SA, McKee DD, Oliver BB, Willson TM, Zetterstrom RH, et al. (1998) An orphan nuclear receptor activated by pregnanes defines a novel steroid signaling pathway. Cell 92: 73-82.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ko BC, Ruepp B, Bohren KM, Gabbay KH, and Chung SS (1997) Identification and characterization of multiple osmotic response sequences in the human aldose reductase gene. J Biol Chem 272: 16431-16437.
Ko BC, Turck CW, Lee KW, Yang Y, and Chung SS (2000) Purification, identification, and characterization of an osmotic response element binding protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 270: 52-61.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kuehl P, Zhang J, Lin Y, Lamba J, Assem M, Schuetz J, Watkins PB, Daly A, Wrighton SA, Hall SD, et al. (2001) Sequence diversity in CYP3A promoters and characterization of the genetic basis of polymorphic CYP3A5 expression. Nat Genet 27: 383-391.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ladas SD, Isaacs PE, and Sladen GE (1983) Post-prandial changes of osmolality and electrolyte concentration in the upper jejunum of normal man. Digestion 26: 218-223.[Medline]
Lam AK, Ko BC, Tam S, Morris R, Yang JY, Chung SK, and Chung SS (2004) Osmotic response element-binding protein (OREBP) is an essential regulator of the urine concentrating mechanism. J Biol Chem 279: 48048-48054.
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-
Ct method. Methods 25: 402-408.[CrossRef][Medline]
López-Rodríguez C, Aramburu J, Jin L, Rakeman AS, Michino M, and Rao A (2001) Bridging the NFAT and NF-kappaB families: NFAT5 dimerization regulates cytokine gene transcription in response to osmotic stress. Immunity 15: 47-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
López-Rodríguez C, Aramburu J, Rakeman AS, and Rao A (1999) NFAT5, a constitutively nuclear NFAT protein that does not cooperate with Fos and Jun. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 7214-7219.
Miyakawa H, Woo SK, Dahl SC, Handler JS, and Kwon HM (1999) Tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein, a rel-like protein that stimulates transcription in response to hypertonicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 2538-2542.
Muntane-Relat J, Ourlin JC, Domergue J, and Maurel P (1995) Differential effects of cytokines on the inducible expression of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP3A4 in human hepatocytes in primary culture. Hepatology 22: 1143-1153.[CrossRef][Medline]
Na KY, Woo SK, Lee SD, and Kwon HM (2003) Silencing of TonEBP/NFAT5 transcriptional activator by RNA interference. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 283-288.
Nelson DR, Zeldin DC, Hoffman SM, Maltais LJ, Wain HM, and Nebert DW (2004) Comparison of cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes from the mouse and human genomes, including nomenclature recommendations for genes, pseudogenes and alternative-splice variants. Pharmacogenetics 14: 1-18.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rim JS, Atta MG, Dahl SC, Berry GT, Handler JS, and Kwon HM (1998) Transcription of the sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter gene is regulated by multiple tonicity-responsive enhancers spread over 50 kilobase pairs in the 5'-flanking region. J Biol Chem 273: 20615-20621.
Rodriguez-Antona C, Bort R, Jover R, Tindberg N, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Gomez-Lechon MJ, and Castell JV (2003) Transcriptional regulation of human CYP3A4 basal expression by CCAAT enhancer-binding protein
and hepatocyte nuclear factor-3
. Mol Pharmacol 63: 1180-1189.
Schmiedlin-Ren P, Thummel KE, Fisher JM, Paine MF, Lown KS, and Watkins PB (1997) Expression of enzymatically active CYP3A4 by Caco-2 cells grown on extracellular matrix-coated permeable supports in the presence of 1
,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Mol Pharmacol 51: 741-754.
Stroud JC, López-Rodríguez C, Rao A, and Chen L (2002) Structure of a TonEBP-DNA complex reveals DNA encircled by a transcription factor. Nat Struct Biol 9: 90-94.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thompson EE, Kuttab-Boulos H, Witonsky D, Yang L, Roe BA, and Di Rienzo A (2004) CYP3A variation and the evolution of salt-sensitivity variants. Am J Hum Genet 75: 1059-1069.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thummel KE, Brimer C, Yasuda K, Thottassery J, Senn T, Lin Y, Ishizuka H, Kharasch E, Schuetz J, and Schuetz E (2001) Transcriptional control of intestinal cytochrome P-4503A by 1
,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3. Mol Pharmacol 60: 1399-1406.
Tirona RG, Lee W, Leake BF, Lan LB, Cline CB, Lamba V, Parviz F, Duncan SA, Inoue Y, Gonzalez FJ, et al. (2003) The orphan nuclear receptor HNF4alpha determines PXR- and CAR-mediated xenobiotic induction of CYP3A4. Nat Med 9: 220-224.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tong EH, Guo JJ, Huang AL, Liu H, Hu CD, Chung SS, and Ko BC (2006) Regulation of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of transcription factor OREBP/TonEBP/NFAT5. J Biol Chem 281: 23870-23879.
Wang Y, Ko BC, Yang JY, Lam TT, Jiang Z, Zhang J, Chung SK, and Chung SS (2005) Transgenic mice expressing dominant-negative osmotic-response element-binding protein (OREBP) in lens exhibit fiber cell elongation defect associated with increased DNA breaks. J Biol Chem 280: 19986-19991.
Woo SK, Dahl SC, Handler JS, and Kwon HM (2000) Bidirectional regulation of tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein in response to changes in tonicity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F1006-F1012.
Xie W, Barwick JL, Simon CM, Pierce AM, Safe S, Blumberg B, Guzelian PS, and Evans RM (2000) Reciprocal activation of xenobiotic response genes by nuclear receptors SXR/PXR and CAR. Genes Dev 14: 3014-3023.
Yamauchi A, Uchida S, Preston AS, Kwon HM, and Handler JS (1993) Hypertonicity stimulates transcription of gene for Na+-myo-inositol cotransporter in MDCK cells. Am J Physiol 264: F20-F23.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Kwon, S. W. Lim, and H. M. Kwon Hypertonic Stress in the Kidney: A Necessary Evil Physiology, June 1, 2009; 24(3): 186 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||