|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PKC Associated with
RACK: Cross-Talk between cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase A and Protein Kinase C Signaling PathwaysCV Therapeutics, Inc., Palo Alto, California (L.Y., P.F., Z.J., I.D.); Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, Emeryville, California (L.Y., A.G., I.D.); Departments of Neurology (L.Y., I.D.) and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology (I.D.), and the Neuroscience Graduate Program (I.D.), University of California, San Francisco, California; and Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (D.M.)
Received October 9, 2007; accepted January 17, 2008
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
protein kinase C (
PKC) and cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA). However, little is known about the mechanism underlying ethanol- and D2-mediated activation of
PKC and the relationship to PKA activation. In the present study, we used a new
PKC antibody, 14E6, that selectively recognized active
PKC when not bound to its anchoring protein
RACK (receptor for activated C-kinase), and PKC isozyme-selective inhibitors and activators to measure PKC translocation and catalytic activity. We show here that ethanol and NPA activated
PKC and induced translocation of both
PKC and its anchoring protein,
RACK to a new cytosolic site. The selective
PKC agonist, pseudo-
RACK, activated
PKC but did not cause translocation of the
PKC/
RACK complex to the cytosol. These data suggest a step-wise activation and translocation of
PKC after NPA or ethanol treatment, where
PKC first translocates and binds to its RACK and subsequently the
PKC/
RACK complex translocates to a new subcellular site. Direct activation of PKA by adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate, Sp-isomer (Sp-cAMPS), prostaglandin E1, or the adenosine A2A receptor is sufficient to cause
PKC translocation to the cytosolic compartment in a process that is dependent on PLC activation and requires PKA activity. These data demonstrate a novel cross-talk mechanism between
PKC and PKA signaling systems. PKA and PKC signaling have been implicated in alcohol rewarding properties in the mesolimbic dopamine system. Cross-talk between PKA and PKC may underlie some of the behaviors associated with alcoholism.
PKC mediates an intracellular response to ethanol (Gordon et al., 1997
PKC knockout mice exhibit decreased alcohol consumption in two bottle-choice and operant self-administration paradigms (Hodge et al., 1999
PKC in the basal forebrain, amygdala, and cerebellum of
PKC knockout mice restored the wild-type response to alcohol (Choi et al., 2002
Stimulation of cells with hormones or neurotransmitters that trigger diacylglycerol (DAG) formation causes activation and translocation of PKC from one subcellular site to another (Mochly-Rosen and Gordon, 1998
). Translocation of PKC is associated with anchoring of the activated enzyme to selective receptors for activated C-kinase (RACKs); the functional selectivity of each activated PKC isozyme is determined by its binding to a corresponding RACK (Mochly-Rosen and Gordon, 1998
). However, it is not clear how the active enzyme translocates to its functional site where its RACK is located and what other enzymes may be involved in the activation and translocation process.
Alcohol and other addictive drugs seem to converge on specific dopaminergic pathways in the midbrain. In particular, dopamine D2 receptors (D2) have been implicated in the rewarding properties of these drugs (Robbins and Everitt, 1999
; Volkow et al., 2004
). We previously demonstrated in NG108-15/D2 cells that ethanol and the D2 agonist 2,10,11-trihydroxy-N-propylnorapomorphine hydrobromide (NPA) cause translocation of
PKC from the perinuclear region to the cytoplasm (Gordon et al., 1997
, 2001
).
PKC translocation in ethanol-stimulated cells reached maximum at 30 min, whereas NPA-induced
PKC translocation was maximal at 10 min (Gordon et al., 1997
, 2001
). In these cells, ethanol and NPA also activated cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) (Dohrman et al., 2002
; Yao et al., 2002
); this activation also occurred within the first minute of stimulation (Dohrman et al., 2002
; Yao et al., 2002
). PKA is localized at the Golgi apparatus (Dohrman et al., 1996
), near the location of
PKC in unstimulated cells (Gordon et al., 1997
, 2001
). In this current study, we found that
PKC binding to
RACK precedes its translocation and that PKA is required for the translocation of the
PKC/
RACK complex.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture. NG108-15 cells stably expressing the rat D2L receptor (NG108-15/D2) (Asai et al., 1998
) were grown on single-well slides in defined media for 2 days followed by daily replacement until day 4 (Dohrman et al., 1996
). The cells were treated as described in the figure legends and fixed as described below (Gordon et al., 1997
).
Immunocytochemistry and Microscopy. Cells were fixed with ice-cold methanol for 2 to 3 min and rinsed three times with PBS, incubated at room temperature with blocking buffer (1% normal goat serum in PBS and 0.1% Triton X-100) for 3 to 4 h, and then incubated overnight at 4°C in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 2 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (Dohrman et al., 1996
), primary antibodies specific for
PKC (mouse IgG raised against the V5 domain of
PKC; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA),
RACK (rat IgG; Stressgen, Victoria, BC, Canada) for
RACK, and 14E6 (mouse IgM, raised against the V1 domain of
PKC) for active
PKC (Souroujon et al., 2004
). The cells were then washed three times with PBS, incubated for 1 h at room temperature with goat anti-mouse IgM, anti-mouse IgG, or anti-rat IgG secondary antibodies (Cappel, Aurora, OH) (diluted 1:1000), washed three times with PBS, and coverslipped with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Cells were imaged using a scanning laser confocal microscope (1024; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) equipped with a krypton-argon laser attached to a microscope (Optiphot; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Images were collected as z-series using Kalman averaging of scans (Gordon et al., 1997
). Collected data were processed using NIH Image (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/) and Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA). All images were obtained under 40x magnification from individual middle sections of the projected z-series.
Quantification of PKC Localization. Fields on each slide were selected at random and cells were scored for perinuclear or cytoplasmic staining by two independent observers who were blind to the experimental conditions. At least four fields were scored for each experiment, for a total number of at least 50 cells per slide.
Cell Fractionation. NG108-15/D2 cells in 100-mm dishes (2 x 106 cells/dish) were incubated with ethanol or NPA for 10 min, washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed on ice in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM MgCL2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitors (0.1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 25 µg/ml aprotinin, 25 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). Cells were homogenized by 10 passes through a 26-gauge needle and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was centrifuged for 20 min at 150,000g to separate the membrane pellet from the cytosol (Yao et al., 2002
). The supernatant was saved as the cytosolic fraction. The remaining pellets were suspended in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100, titrated and incubated on ice for 20 min. This suspension was centrifuged as described above, and the Triton-soluble material was collected as the original particulate fraction.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot. Five micrograms of
PKC monoclonal IgG antibody was incubated with 50 µl of protein A/G beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) overnight at 4°C. Antibody-bound beads were then washed twice with PBS and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin for 2 h at 4°C. The cytosolic fraction was precleared with protein A/G beads for 30 min at 4°C, incubated with the antibody-bound beads overnight at 4°C and subsequently washed four times with PBS. Bound material was eluted with SDS sample buffer, run on a 10% SDS/PAGE and transferred and probed for
PKC (mouse IgG, Santa Cruz, CA) and
RACK (rat IgG, Victoria, BC). Secondary antibody was horseradish peroxidase-linked goat anti-mouse or anti-rat (1:1000) (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Waltham, MA). Proteins were detected using chemiluminescence substrate (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences).
PKC Activity Assay. Cells grown in 100-mm plates were treated with ethanol or NPA for 10 min, washed with cold PBS, harvested in 1 ml of whole-cell lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM EGTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 tablet of protease inhibitor/10 ml), and lysed on ice for 20 min. The lysate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min in an Eppendorf centrifuge. The supernatant was immunoprecipitated for
PKC as described above. To assay
PKC activity, immunoprecipitates were incubated at 30°C for 20 min with 10 µM ATP, 0.5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, and a peptide substrate mixture from SignaTECT PKC Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI). PKC activity was detected as described by the manufacturer.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PKC and
RACK to the Same Location. Ethanol and the D2 agonist NPA cause translocation of
PKC (Gordon et al., 1997
PKC associates with the
RACK known as β'-coat protein (Csukai et al., 1997
RACK translocates together with
PKC, NG108-15/D2 cells were treated with either ethanol or the D2 agonist NPA for 10 min and analyzed for translocation of
PKC and
RACK. Figure 1A shows that ethanol and NPA each induced
PKC (green) translocation from the nucleus/perinucleus to the cytoplasm and
RACK (red) from the Golgi/perinucleus to the cytoplasm. The merged images (yellow, Fig. 1A) indicate that
PKC and
RACK are colocalized in the cytoplasm in ethanol- and NPA-treated cells. Cotranslocation and association of the two proteins was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation. Western blot analysis showed that the amount of
PKC in the cytosolic compartment increased concomitantly with the amount of
RACK (Fig. 1B), suggesting that
PKC and
RACK moved together after treatment with either ethanol or NPA.
|
PKA Activation Is Required and Sufficient to Cause
PKC and
RACK Translocation. Because ethanol and NPA also activate PKA, and PKA translocation is more rapid than
PKC (Dohrman et al., 1996
; Gordon et al., 1998
, 2001
; Yao et al., 2002
), we sought to determine whether PKA is required for
PKC and
RACK translocation and colocalization. Figure 1, A and B, show that the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMPS prevents the translocation of both
PKC and
RACK, because the distribution of
PKC and
RACK seems the same as in control cells. In contrast, NPA- and ethanol-induced translocation of
PKC was not affected by Rp-cAMPS (data not shown). To investigate how PKA regulates ethanol- and NPA-induced
PKC and
RACK translocation, we determined whether activation of PKA is sufficient for
PKC and
RACK translocation. Figure 2 shows that the PKA activator Sp-cAMPS or activation of the G
s-coupled PGE1 receptor each causes translocation of
PKC and
RACK to the cytoplasm, similar to ethanol and NPA treatments (Fig. 1A). We demonstrated previously that ethanol activates PKA via adenosine A2A receptors (A2A) (Yao et al., 2002
). To determine whether direct activation of the adenosine A2A receptor causes translocation of
PKC/
RACK, cells were treated with an adenosine A2A agonist CGS21680 for 10 min. We found that CGS21680 mimics ethanol-induced translocation of
PKC/
RACK (Fig. 1C). This translocation was blocked by the A2A antagonist DMPX or the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMPS (Fig. 1C). Rp-cAMPS and DMPX had no effect on the localization of
PKC and
RACK in unstimulated cells (data not shown).
|
PKC via PLC in NG108-15/D2 cells. We found that the PLC inhibitor Et-18-OCH3 had no effect in unstimulated cells (data not shown) and inhibited Sp-cAMPS- or PGE1-induced translocation of
PKC and
RACK (Fig. 2). As expected, Rp-cAMPS also prevented these translocations (Fig. 2).
Ethanol and NPA Caused Translocation of
PKC/
RACK Complex via the PLC/PKC System. We have previously shown that ethanol- or NPA-induced translocation of
PKC is blocked by the PLC inhibitor Et-18-OCH3 (Gordon et al., 2001
). If PLC activation is required for ethanol- and NPA-induced translocation of
PKC, then inhibition of PLC activity should also inhibit translocation of
PKC/
RACK. Indeed, the PLC inhibitor Et-18-OCH3 blocked
RACK translocation along with
PKC (Fig. 2 and 3). As anticipated, the PKC inhibitor GF 109203X also blocked translocation (data not shown).
|
and β
released from trimeric G proteins can stimulate PLCβ isozymes (Camps et al., 1992
PKC (Gordon et al., 2001
RACK translocation requires G
i. We found that PTX, which inhibits G
i/o and Gβ
, prevented cotranslocation of
RACK with
PKC (Fig. 3). We know that the A2A antagonist DMPX blocks ethanol- but not NPA-induced
PKC translocation and that the D2 antagonist spiperone blocks NPA- but not ethanol-induced
PKC translocation (Gordon et al., 2001
RACK translocation separately (Fig. 3). In contrast, PTX, DMPX or spiperone alone was without effect on the localization of
PKC and
RACK in unstimulated cells (data not shown). Taken together, these findings suggest that ethanol, via the adenosine A2A receptor, and dopamine, via the D2 receptor, cause
PKC and
RACK translocation by stimulating the PLC/PKC signaling pathway.
PKC Activation Is Required for Translocation of
PKC and
RACK. To further investigate whether
PKC activation regulates the translocation of
PKC and
RACK, we used an IgM monoclonal antibody, 14E6, that specifically detects the active conformation of
PKC (Souroujon et al., 2004
). Figure 4, A and B, show that translocation of
PKC (green) together with
RACK (blue) began at 1 min and persists for 30 min after the addition of ethanol and NPA. In contrast,
PKC staining with 14E6 (red) increased within 1 min, maximized by 10 min, and returned to the basal level by 30 min (Fig. 4, A and B).
PKC translocation was observed at the time when 14E6 staining appeared. These data suggest that
PKC activation seems to be required for the translocation of
PKC and
RACK. Consistent with our published observations (Souroujon et al., 2004
),
PKC activation precedes its binding to
RACK and its translocation with
RACK to the cytoplasm. Translocation of
PKC persisted at 30 min when the activated enzyme was no longer detected by 14E6 (Fig. 4, A and B), suggesting that the 14E6 epitope (V1 domain, the RACK-binding domain) becomes inaccessible when
PKC is bound to
RACK (Souroujon et al., 2004
). We confirmed these findings by directly measuring the catalytic activity of
PKC. In accordance with translocation,
PKC activity peaked at 10 min, persisted at 30 min and returned to the basal level at 60 min (Fig. 4C).
|
PKC and
RACK, cells were treated with isozyme-selective translocation peptide inhibitors:
V1-2 for
PKC,
V1-1 for
PKC or βC2-4 for conventional PKC (Schechtman and Mochly-Rosen, 2002
V1-2, but not
V1-1 or βC2-4, prevented ethanol- or NPA-induced translocation of
PKC and
RACK (Fig. 5, A and B). In control experiments, these peptide inhibitors did not alter the localization of
PKC and
RACK in unstimulated cells (data not shown). These results suggest that
PKC activation is solely responsible for ethanol- and NPA-induced translocation of
PKC and
RACK.
|
PKC Activation and Translocation with
RACK Are Separate Events. It seems that ethanol and NPA induce translocation of
PKC and
RACK via the PLC/PKC system. However, we found that these translocations are also PKA-dependent. To understand the role of PKC and PKA in this process, cells were treated with an
PKC agonist pseudo-
RACK (
RACK) that activates only
PKC (Schechtman and Mochly-Rosen, 2002
RACK activated
PKC, as detected by 14E6 (red). Some
PKC translocates from the nucleus to the perinucleus, where it seems to bind to
RACK (pink). However, activated
PKC did not translocate further to the cytoplasmic compartment (Fig. 6A). Cells treated with NPA, which stimulates both PKA and PKC, showed translocation of
PKC and
RACK to this cytoplasmic compartment (Fig. 6A). Moreover, the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMPS blocked NPA-induced translocation of
PKC and
RACK but did not affect activation of
PKC as measured by 14E6 staining (Fig. 6A). Western blot analysis confirmed that NPA, but not pseudo-
RACK, caused
PKC translocation from the particulate to the cytosolic fraction (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that the complex
RACK/
PKC does not translocate further into the cytosolic compartment unless PKA is active. It seems that
PKC activation and anchoring to its RACK and translocation of the
PKC/
RACK complex are separate events.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PKC and
RACK to a new site and that this process requires PKA activity. After stimulation,
PKC translocates from the perinucleus/nucleus to a new perinuclear/Golgi compartment, perhaps where
RACK is colocalized in unstimulated cells. Subsequently,
PKC and the
RACK translocate from the perinucleus/Golgi to the cytosol. Translocation of
PKC and
RACK to the cytosol occurs only when PKA is activated, a process that is G
i-dependent. Consistent with this observation, the
PKC agonist, pseudo-
RACK, did not cause the translocation of
PKC to the cytosol, although it did activate
PKC. Moreover, activation of PKA by Sp-cAMPS, PGE1, or the adenosine A2A receptor alone was sufficient to cause
PKC and
RACK translocation. Note that PKA-dependent translocation of
PKC was inhibited by the PLC inhibitor Et-18-OCH3, suggesting that in addition to the PLC-mediated cross-talk between PKC and PKA signaling, there is a second cross-talk event leading to translocation of
PKC/
RACK complex that is dependent on PKA activity. Therefore, there is a dual requirement for PKA activity in PKC signaling. A schematic model for ethanol and D2 activation of PKA/PKC cross talk is presented in Fig. 7.
|
) of PKA to translocate from the Golgi to the cytoplasm and nucleus (Dohrman et al., 1996
translocation seems to be due to an ethanol-induced increase of extracellular adenosine, which activates adenosine A2A receptors to promote cAMP production (Yao et al., 2002
translocation is probably due to Gβ
activation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) II and/or IV, because PTX and Gβ
scavenger peptide prevent PKA C
translocation (Yao et al., 2002
activation of AC II or IV requires either G
s (Federman et al., 1992
s and Gβ
, respectively. Moreover, the PKC inhibitor GF 109203X blocks PKA C
translocation induced by NPA but not that induced by ethanol (L. Yao, P. Fan, Z. Jiang, and I. Diamond, unpublished observations).
PKC and RACK. Ethanol and NPA also induce translocation of
PKC. Ethanol at 100 mM induced maximal translocation at 10 min without affecting cell morphology and viability. Ethanol at 50 mM produced maximal translocation at 48 h (Gordon et al., 1997
, 2001
). Therefore, we chose 100 mM ethanol and a 10-min incubation time as optimal conditions to define the mechanism and relationship between
PKC activation and translocation. Using the antibody 14E6, we show that ethanol and NPA activate
PKC and increase the catalytic activity of
PKC measured by phosphorylation. We also show that
V1-2, an inhibitor of
PKC binding to its RACK, prevents ethanol- and NPA-induced translocation of the
PKC/
RACK complex. In contrast, the peptide inhibitor
V1-1 (
PKC) or βC2-4 (classic PKC) had no effect. We previously proposed that the site of localization of activated PKC isozymes is determined by the location of isozyme-specific RACKs (Mochly-Rosen and Gordon, 1998
). Our data suggest that ethanol and NPA use this mechanism to relocate activated
PKC. The activated
PKC binds first to its RACK and subsequently translocates from the perinucleus to a new cytoplasmic compartment. Thus, activation of
PKC seems to be necessary for
PKC and
RACK translocation (Fig. 7). However, activation of
PKC alone is not sufficient to cause translocation of the
PKC/
RACK complex because the
PKC agonist, pseudo-
RACK, does not cause translocation of
PKC into the cytoplasm despite activation of
PKC. These observations demonstrate that PKA activation induced by ethanol or NPA has a dual role in
PKC signaling: first, PKA activates PLC to produce DAG for
PKC activation; second, PKA causes relocation of activated
PKC/
RACK. This is likely to yield different cellular responses, as the protein substrates of
PKC should be different in each of these cellular locations.
Cross-Talk between PKA and PKC Signaling. Cross-talk between PKA and PKC signaling pathways is increasingly recognized as a mechanism to regulate signal transduction cascades. However, the molecular events underlying PKA/PKC cross-talk are not clear. Recent work suggests a role for PKA in the activation and translocation of PKC (Yu et al., 1996
; Huang et al., 2001
). PKA-dependent activation of PKC also occurs in B lymphocytes (Cambier et al., 1987
). In addition, activation of dopamine D1 receptors, known to couple to G
s, increases PKC activity and translocation in LTK cells (Yu et al., 1996
). In this study, we demonstrate that translocation of
PKC and
RACK by ethanol and NPA requires PKA activation, but the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMPS does not inhibit the activation of
PKC. These findings suggest that PKA may regulate the location of
PKC/
RACK complex but does not affect the activation state of the enzyme (Fig. 7). Indeed, prosite analysis reveals a consensus PKA phosphorylation site in
RACK (L. Yao, P. Fan, Z. Jiang, and I. Diamond, unpublished observation). Thus, not only do RACKs bind activated PKC isozymes but also RACK phosphorylation may further regulate its translocation to intracellular sites.
One of our most surprising findings is that robust activation of PKA by Sp-cAMPS or PGE1 was sufficient to induce translocation of
PKC and
RACK. It is noteworthy that direct activation of the adenosine A2A receptor by CGS21680 also caused translocation of
PKC/
RACK to the same compartment. We propose that activation of PKA stimulates PLCβ, thus increasing DAG levels and causing activation and translocation of
PKC (Fig. 7). Indeed, a PLC inhibitor blocks
PKC translocation. However, it remains unclear how ethanol, NPA, or PKA activate the correct pool of PKC and how activated
PKC translocates with
RACK to its functional intracellular sites. One explanation is a "targeting hypothesis": phosphorylation events are controlled in part by the intracellular location of specific kinases in the cell (Hubbard and Cohen, 1993
). It has also been suggested that intracellular anchoring proteins regulate cell signaling dynamics in time and space. The Golgi complex is a major subcellular location for PKA in mammalian cells (Nigg et al., 1985
; Dohrman et al., 1996
; Yao et al., 2002
) and is involved in vesicle-mediated protein transport processes (Muñiz et al., 1997
). Scott and collaborators and others suggest that some anchoring proteins for PKA, collectively termed AKAPs for A kinase anchoring proteins, also bind inactive PKC in the Golgi (Faux and Scott, 1997
; Pawson and Scott, 1997
). In addition,
RACK, β'-coat protein, is a coatomer protein that moves with vesicles and localizes at the Golgi apparatus (Salama and Schekman, 1995
). Thus, AKAPs such as AKAP 350 may act as scaffold proteins that bind PKA,
PKC, and
RACK (Diviani and Scott, 2001
; Shanks et al., 2002
) in the Golgi and serve as a platform to organize and regulate PKA and PKC interactions. It remains to be determined which AKAP binds to PKA,
PKC, and
RACK, and how AKAP targets PKA and
PKC to discrete intracellular locations and coordinates multiple components of signal transduction pathways.
Relevance to Alcoholism. Our results provide new insight into some of the cellular events mediated by ethanol and dopamine. Ethanol causes the release of dopamine in the brain (Imperato and Di Chiara, 1986
; McBride et al., 1993
) and presumably dopamine acts on D2 to mediate rewarding properties of ethanol. We show here that both ethanol and a D2 agonist activate both PKA and PKC signaling pathways via a complex cross-talk between these two signaling cascades. It is tempting to speculate that ethanol and D2 may activate the same signaling pathways because they synergistically activate PKA and PKC signaling (Gordon et al., 2001
; Yao et al., 2002
). Moreover, ethanol- and dopamine-regulated translocation of PKA and
PKC seems to play a role in drinking behaviors; mice lacking
PKC show reduced operant ethanol self-administration (Hodge et al., 1999
; Olive et al., 2000
) and inhibition of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway generally increases sensitivity to ethanol sedation and reduces ethanol preference and consumption (Moore et al., 1998
; Wand et al., 2001
; Yao et al., 2002
). Taken together with the results in this study, it is possible that drugs which interfere with PKA and PKC cross-talk might be potential therapeutics for alcoholism.
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: PKC, protein kinase C; DAG, diacylglycerol; D2, dopamine D2 receptor; NPA, 2,10,11-trihydroxy-N-propylnorapomorphine hydrobromide; PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase A; Rp-cAMPS, adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate, Rp-isomer; Sp-cAMPS, adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate, Sp-isomer; GF109203X, Bisindolylmaleimide I; Et-18-OCH3, 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-methyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DMPX, 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine; PLC, phospholipase C; PTX, pertussis toxin; PGE1, prostaglandin E1; CGS21680, 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine; AKAP, A kinase anchoring protein; A2A, adenosine A2A receptor; IgG, immunoglobulin G.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Lina Yao, CV Therapeutics, Inc., 3172 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304. E-mail: lina.yao{at}cvt.com
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baker LP, Nielsen MD, Impey S, Hacker BM, Poser SW, Chan MY, and Storm DR (1999) Regulation and immunohistochemical localization of betagamma-stimulated adenylyl cyclases in mouse hippocampus. J Neurosci 19: 180-192.
Cambier JC, Newell MK, Justement LB, McGuire JC, Leach KL, and Chen ZZ (1987) Ia binding ligands and cAMP stimulate nuclear translocation of PKC in B lymphocytes. Nature 327: 629-632.[CrossRef][Medline]
Camps M, Carozzi A, Schnabel P, Scheer A, Parker PJ, and Gierschik P (1992) Isozyme-selective stimulation of phospholipase C-beta 2 by G protein beta gamma-subunits. Nature 360: 684-686.[CrossRef][Medline]
Choi DS, Wang D, Dadgar J, Chang WS, and Messing RO (2002) Conditional rescue of protein kinase C epsilon regulates ethanol preference and hypnotic sensitivity in adult mice. J Neurosci 22: 9905-9911.
Csukai M, Chen CH, De Matteis MA, and Mochly-Rosen D (1997) The coatomer protein β'-COP, a selective binding protein (RACK) for protein kinase C
. J Biol Chem 272: 29200-29206.
Diviani D and Scott JD (2001) AKAP signaling complexes at the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 114: 1431-1437.[Abstract]
Dohrman DP, Chen HM, Gordon AS, and Diamond I (2002) Ethanol-induced translocation of protein kinase A occurs in two phases: control by different molecular mechanisms. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 26: 407-415.[Medline]
Dohrman DP, Diamond I, and Gordon AS (1996) Ethanol causes translocation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit to the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 10217-10221.
Faux MC and Scott JD (1997) Regulation of the AKAP79-protein kinase C interaction by Ca2+/calmodulin. J Biol Chem 272: 17038-17044.
Federman AD, Conklin BR, Schrader KA, Reed RR, and Bourne HR (1992) Hormonal stimulation of adenylyl cyclase through Gi-protein beta gamma subunits. Nature 356: 159-161.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gordon AS, Yao L, Dohrman DP and Diamond I (1998) Ethanol alters the subcellular localization of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22: 238S-242S.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gordon AS, Yao L, Jiang Z, Fishburn CS, Fuchs S, and Diamond I (2001) Ethanol acts synergistically with a D2 dopamine agonist to cause translocation of protein kinase C. Mol Pharmacol 59: 153-160.
Gordon AS, Yao L, Wu ZL, Coe IR, and Diamond I (1997) Ethanol alters the subcellular localization of delta- and epsilon protein kinase C in NG108-15 cells. Mol Pharmacol 52: 554-559.
Hodge CW, Mehmert KK, Kelley SP, McMahon T, Haywood A, Olive MF, Wang D, Sanchez-Perez AM, and Messing RO (1999) Supersensitivity to allosteric GABA(A) receptor modulators and alcohol in mice lacking PKCepsilon. Nat Neurosci 2: 997-1002.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huang NK, Lin YW, Huang CL, Messing RO, and Chern Y (2001) Activation of protein kinase A and atypical protein kinase C by A(2A) adenosine receptors antagonizes apoptosis due to serum deprivation in PC12 cells. J Biol Chem 276: 13838-13846.
Hubbard MJ and Cohen P (1993) On target with a new mechanism for the regulation of protein phosphorylation. Trends Biochem Sci 18: 172-177.[CrossRef][Medline]
Imperato A and Di Chiara G (1986) Preferential stimulation of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats by ethanol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 239: 219-228.
McBride WJ, Murphy JM, Gatto GJ, Levy AD, Yoshimoto K, Lumeng L, and Li TK (1993) CNS mechanisms of alcohol self-administration. Alcohol Alcohol Suppl 2: 463-467.[Medline]
Mochly-Rosen D, and Gordon AS (1998) Anchoring proteins for protein kinase C: a means for isozyme selectivity. Faseb J 12: 35-42.
Moore MS, DeZazzo J, Luk AY, Tully T, Singh CM, and Heberlein U (1998) Ethanol intoxication in Drosophila: genetic and pharmacological evidence for regulation by the cAMP signaling pathway. Cell 93: 997-1007.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muñiz M, Martin ME, Hidalgo J, and Velasco A (1997) Protein kinase A activity is required for the budding of constitutive transport vesicles from the trans-Golgi network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 14461-14466.
Newton PM and Messing RO (2006) Intracellular signaling pathways that regulate behavioral responses to ethanol. Pharmacol Ther 109: 227-237.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nigg EA, Schafer G, Hilz H, and Eppenberger HM (1985) Cyclic-AMP-dependent protein kinase type II is associated with the Golgi complex and with centrosomes. Cell 41: 1039-1051.[CrossRef][Medline]
Olive MF, Mehmert KK, Messing RO, and Hodge CW (2000) Reduced operant ethanol self-administration and in vivo mesolimbic dopamine responses to ethanol in PKCepsilon-deficient mice. Eur J Neurosci 12: 4131-4140.[CrossRef][Medline]
Olive MF and Messing RO (2004) Protein kinase C isozymes and addiction. Mol Neurobiol 29: 139-154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Park D, Jhon DY, Lee CW, Lee KH, and Rhee SG (1993) Activation of phospholipase C isozymes by G protein beta gamma subunits. J Biol Chem 268: 4573-4576.
Pawson T and Scott JD (1997) Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science 278: 2075-2080.
Robbins TW and Everitt BJ (1999) Drug addiction: bad habits add up. Nature 398: 567-570.[CrossRef][Medline]
Runnels LW and Scarlata SF (1999) Determination of the affinities between hetero-trimeric G protein subunits and their phospholipase C-beta effectors. Biochemistry 38: 1488-1496.[CrossRef][Medline]
Salama NR and Schekman RW (1995) The role of coat proteins in the biosynthesis of secretory proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7: 536-543.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schechtman D and Mochly-Rosen D (2002) Isozyme-specific inhibitors and activators of protein kinase C. Methods Enzymol 345: 470-489.[Medline]
Shanks RA, Steadman BT, Schmidt PH, and Goldenring JR (2002) AKAP350 at the Golgi apparatus. I. Identification of a distinct Golgi apparatus targeting motif in AKAP350. J Biol Chem 277: 40967-40972.
Souroujon MC, Yao L, Chen H, Endemann G, Khaner H, Geeraert V, Schechtman D, Gordon AS, Diamond I, and Mochly-Rosen D (2004) State-specific monoclonal antibodies identify an intermediate state in epsilon protein kinase C activation. J Biol Chem 279: 17617-17624.
Tsu RC and Wong YH (1996) Gi-mediated stimulation of type II adenylyl cyclase is augmented by Gq-coupled receptor activation and phorbol ester treatment. J Neurosci 16: 1317-1323.
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, and Swanson JM (2004) Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: results from imaging studies and treatment implications. Mol Psychiatry 9: 557-569.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wand G, Levine M, Zweifel L, Schwindinger W, and Abel T (2001) The cAMP-protein kinase A signal transduction pathway modulates ethanol consumption and sedative effects of ethanol. J Neurosci 21: 5297-5303.
Yao L, Arolfo MP, Dohrman DP, Jiang Z, Fan P, Fuchs S, Janak PH, Gordon AS, and Diamond I (2002) betagamma Dimers mediate synergy of dopamine D2 and adenosine A2 receptor-stimulated PKA signaling and regulate ethanol consumption. Cell 109: 733-743.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yao L, Fan P, Jiang Z, Mailliard WS, Gordon AS, and Diamond I (2003) Addicting drugs utilize a synergistic molecular mechanism in common requiring adenosine and Gi-β
dimers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 14379-14384.
Yu PY, Eisner GM, Yamaguchi I, Mouradian MM, Felder RA, and Jose PA (1996) Dopamine D1A receptor regulation of phospholipase C isoform. J Biol Chem 271: 19503-19508.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K. Kelm, H. E. Criswell, and G. R. Breese The Role of Protein Kinase A in the Ethanol-Induced Increase in Spontaneous GABA Release Onto Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3417 - 3428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||