|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute and Department of Physiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Received November 14, 2007; accepted January 22, 2008
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Niflumic acid [2-((3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)amino)-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, NFA] is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that preferentially inhibits type 2 cyclooxygenase and is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and relieve acute pain. NFA and other fenamates (flufenamic acid, mefenamic acid, meclofenamic acid) also modulate the gating or block many different ion channels. Fenamates were first shown to block Ca2+-activated Cl- channels (White and Aylwin, 1990
), but also to block CFTR channels (Scott-Ward et al., 2004
) and activate or block CLC-K channels (Liantonio et al., 2006
). These compounds also activate large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (Ottolia and Toro, 1994
), block Kv2.1 (Lee and Wang, 1999
), enhance or alter the gating of Kv4.2 and Kv4.3 (Wang et al., 1997
), KCNQ1/minK (Busch et al., 1994
), and KCNQ2/3 channels (Peretz et al., 2005
). NFA and flufenamic acid cause a modest increase in hERG1 channel current (Malykhina et al., 2002
). In all channels studied, fenamates exhibit an extremely rapid onset of action and apparently bind to an extracellular site on the channel that has not yet been identified.
In addition to NFA, hERG1 channels are also activated by more potent and selective compounds such as NS1643 (Casis et al., 2006
; Hansen et al., 2006
), PD-118057 (Zhou et al., 2005
), and RPR260243 (Kang et al., 2005
). These compounds increase current magnitude by inducing a positive shift in the voltage-dependence of inactivation. In addition, RPR260243 slows the rate of channel deactivation. PD-118057 is structurally similar to flufenamic acid (also a phenylaminobenzoic acid) and was reported to enhance hERG1 without any measurable effect on kinetics or voltage dependence of channel gating. The molecular mechanism(s) responsible for the increased current magnitude of ERG channels by fenamates has not been determined. An understanding of this mechanism could facilitate the design of more potent and specific hERG1 activators. Furthermore, subtype-specific ERG channel activators would serve as unique tools to advance investigations of the physiological role(s) of ERG channels in neurons.
In this study, we show that NFA is a nonspecific activator of ERG channels. NFA enhanced current of all three ERG channel subtypes (ERG1, ERG2, and ERG3) by inducing a positive shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation and a variable negative shift in the voltage dependence of activation. Characterization of chimeric ERG channels and a site-directed mutagenesis approach was used to demonstrate that sensitivity to NFA was determined by specific residues located in the extracellular S3-S4 linker.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Six hERG1-rERG2 chimera subunits were constructed: N-S4 chimera, hERG1 with the N terminus and the S1-S4 from rERG2 (Met1-Ala527); S1-S4 chimera, hERG1 with the S1-S4 from rERG2 (Leu417-Ala527); L12 chimera, hERG1 with the external linker connecting S1 to S2 domain from rERG2 (Leu417-Asp460); S2 chimera, hERG1 with S2 domain from rERG2 (Ala453-Leu468); L23 chimera, hERG1 with the S2-S3 internal linker from rERG2 (Ala479-Gly487); and L34 chimera, hERG1 with the S3-S4 external linker from rERG2 (Gly514-Ala527).
Unique restriction sites were inserted into hERG1 as follows: N-S4 chimera, HindIII (at the multiple cloning site) and AscI (1578-1584 bp); S1-S4 chimera, SpeI (1248-1251 bp) and AscI (1578-1584 bp); L12 chimera, SpeI (1248-1251 bp) and EcoRV (1380 bp); and L34 chimera, BspEI (1540-1543 bp) and AscI (1578-1584 bp). The same restriction sites were introduced at homologous positions in rERG2. The S2 chimera and L23 chimera, as well as simple point mutations, were created using QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Restriction mapping and DNA sequencing were used to confirm sequences. cRNA for injection into oocytes was prepared with the mMessage mMachine in vitro transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) and SP6 polymerase after linearization with EcoRI (hERG1 and rERG2) or NheI (rERG3). Estimates of cRNA quality and quantity were determined by gel electrophoresis and UV spectroscopy.
Isolation, Injection, and Voltage-Clamp of Oocytes. Stage IV and V Xenopus laevis oocytes were isolated and injected with cRNA encoding wild-type (WT) or mutant ERG channels (Stühmer, 1992
). Oocytes were injected with 5 to 20 ng of ERG cRNA then cultured in Barth's solution supplemented with 50 µg/ml gentamicin and 1 mM pyruvate at 18°C for 1 to 3 days before use in voltage clamp experiments. Barth's solution contained 88 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 0.4 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM Ca(NO3)2, 1 mM MgSO4, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. For voltage-clamp experiments, oocytes were bathed in a modified ND96 solution containing 96 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6.
Currents were recorded at room temperature (23-25°C) using standard two-microelectrode voltage-clamp techniques (Stühmer, 1992
) with a Geneclamp 500 amplifier and Digidata 1322A data acquisition system (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). pCLAMP 8 software (Molecular Devices) and a personal computer were used for data acquisition and analysis. The holding potential was -90 mV, and the interpulse interval for all voltage-clamp protocols was 10 s or slower. To obtain current-voltage (I-V) relationships and activation curves, 3-s voltage steps were applied in 10-mV increments to potentials that varied from -90 to +50 mV. To construct I-V relationships, currents were measured at their peak values (Ipeak) and at the end of the 3-s test pulse (Itest). After each step depolarization, the oocyte was repolarized to a return potential (Vret) of -70 or -110 mV to record deactivating tail currents. Other voltage pulse protocols are described under Results and in the figure legends.
Data Analysis. The voltage dependence of ERG channel activation was determined by analysis of peak tail currents. A plot of tail current amplitude (Itail) versus test potential (Vt) was fitted to a Boltzmann equation using Origin 7 (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA) to obtain the half-point (Vact) and slope factor (k) for channel activation: Itail/Itail-max = 1/(1 + exp[(Vact - Vt)/k]). The half-point of ERG channel inactivation (Vinact) was estimated by analysis of the fully activated I-V relationship as described previously (Sanguinetti et al., 1995
).
The shifts in Vact (
Vact) caused by a variable concentration of NFA were fit to the Hill equation (Eq. 2), where EC50 is the drug concentration required for 50% activation, [NFA] is the drug concentration,
Vmax is the maximum shift in Vact and nH is the Hill coefficient:
Vact =
Vmax ([NFA]nH/[(EC50)nH + [NFA])nH]. The rate of current deactivation was determined by fitting tail currents with a two-exponential function, where
fast and
slow are the time constants (in milliseconds) for the fast and slow components, and Af and As are the amplitudes (in microamperes) of the fast and slow components.
Data are presented as mean ± S.E. (n = number of oocytes), and statistical comparisons between experimental groups were performed using the Student's t test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
Drugs. NFA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Niflumic acid was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide as a 100 mM stock solution, and final concentrations were obtained by appropriate dilution with the modified ND96 solution. All solutions containing NFA were corrected to pH 7.6 with NaOH. The control solution contained the same amount of dimethyl sulfoxide as the NFA-containing solution.
Mathematical Modeling. A five-state Markov model of hERG1 channels was used to simulate the effects of NFA on IKr. The model is based on a previously described model of hERG1 channels at 37°C (Lu et al., 2001
). The rate constants for each transition were of the standard format:
=
0exp[z
Vm/(RT/F)] and β = β0exp[-z
Vm/(RT/F)], where F is the Faraday constant, R is the gas constant, T is absolute temperature, Vm is membrane potential, and z is the charge. For reconstruction of current traces at room temperature, rate coefficients from the original model were adjusted with a temperature coefficient Q10 = 3.3. Furthermore, voltage dependence for activation and inactivation was adjusted according to Tables 2 and 3. The simulations with the normal and drug-bound channel models were carried out with the Euler method for numerical solution of ordinary differential equations (Press et al., 1992
). A time step (
t) of 1 µs was chosen. All calculations were performed in double precision.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The rate of inactivation is much faster than activation for ERG channels, resulting in a pronounced decrease in current at depolarized potentials. However, because NFA apparently accelerated the rate of activation for these channels, the currents at +20 to +40 mV have the appearance of a transient outward current. This can be seen more clearly on the expanded time scale shown in Fig. 1C. In contrast to activation, the rate of tail current decay (deactivation) was slowed by NFA (Table 1).
|
The effects of 1 mM NFA on the Ipeak-V relationships for all 3 ERG channel types are shown in Fig. 2A. Under control conditions, Ipeak was maximal at -10 mV (hERG1), 0 mV (rERG2) or -20 mV (rERG3) and was reduced or unchanged (rERG3) at more positive potentials because of rapid C-type inactivation (Smith et al., 1996
; Spector et al., 1996
). For rERG2 and especially rERG3, the increase in Ipeak by NFA was most pronounced at positive test potentials. The effects of 1 mM NFA on the Itest-V relationships are shown in Fig. 2B. rERG2 channels were the most sensitive to NFA with a 2.4-fold increase in current recorded at -10 mV. Thus, based on increases in either Ipeak or Itest, the rank order of sensitivity to 1 mM NFA was rERG2 > rERG3 > hERG1.
|
|
Because the shifts in Vinact by NFA were nearly the same for the 3 ERG channel types, the change in the shape of the Itest - Vt relationships caused by 1 mM NFA (Fig. 2B) must be caused by differential effects on activation. This is more clearly shown in Fig. 4A, where -fold-changes in Itest by NFA were plotted as a function of Vt. At potentials where channel activation was maximal (>-10 mV for hERG1 and rERG3 or >+10 mV for rERG2; see Fig. 3A), the -fold change in current saturated at a value of
1.5. Moreover, the difference in -fold change observed at more negative potentials paralleled the differential shift in activation induced by NFA for the 3 channel types. Combining the measured shifts in the voltage dependence of inactivation and activation was sufficient to account for the effect of 1 mM NFA on the Itest - Vt relationships for all three ERG channel types (Fig. 2B, solid curves).
|
NFA Acted from the Extracellular Side of the Membrane Independent of Channel State. NFA activates ERG channel currents immediately after bath application and the effects are very rapidly reversed with washout of the drug. The rapid kinetics of NFA suggests an extracellular site of action, consistent with the described effects of fenamates on other Kv channels (Ottolia and Toro, 1994
; Lee and Wang, 1999
).
We next examined the channel state dependence of NFA activity. First, we investigated whether NFA could interact with channels in the closed state. hERG1 currents were elicited by repetitive 2-s pulses to +20 mV until currents reached a steady state. hERG1 channels were kept in the closed state for 3 min by clamping the membrane at -90 mV without pulsing while the oocyte chamber was superfused with a solution containing 1 mM NFA. After 3 min, hERG1 channels were activated by a single pulse to +20 mV. The currents measured before and after incubation of an oocyte with NFA are superimposed in Fig. 5A. The current traces are shown on an expanded time scale in Fig. 5B. The onset of drug action appears to be immediate, suggesting that NFA can interact with the closed state of the channel.
|
Next, hERG1 current was elicited by a 40-s depolarizing step to +20 mV to ensure that channels were in the open or inactivated states, but not closed states, during application of NFA. First, a control current was recorded (Fig. 5C, black trace). Then, 7 s after starting a second pulse (Fig. 5C, gray trace), the external solution was switched to one containing 1 mM NFA (indicated by arrow). The current rapidly increased in magnitude and reached an amplitude that was matched during a subsequent pulse (Fig. 5C, red trace). These findings demonstrate that NFA can interact equally well with channels in the closed or open/inactivated states. Similar results were obtained with rERG2 and rERG3 channels (data not shown).
Simulation of the Effects of NFA on hERG1 Channel Gating. A Markov model was used to simulate the effects of NFA on activation, deactivation and inactivation of hERG1 channels. Drug-bound channels were reconstructed by increasing rate coefficients for activation C0
C1
C2
O and decreasing rate coefficients for inactivation (O
I) and recovery from inactivation (I
O). This simple model can account for the NFA-induced increase in Ipeak (Fig. 6D), Itest (Fig. 6E), and Itail (Fig. 6F). The NFA-induced increase in Ipeak at positive voltages was explained by an increased ratio of activation versus inactivation rates. Details of the model, including rate constants and initial values for each state are provided in Supplemental Table 1.
|
Six chimera subunits were constructed. Schematic representations of these subunits are shown in Fig. 7, A and B, along with representative current traces recorded in the absence and presence of 1 mM NFA. We first investigated the role of the voltage sensor domain (VSD) composed of the S1-S4 transmembrane helices. Two chimeras were created by replacing the VSD (S1-S4) or the N terminus plus the VSD (N-S4) of hERG1 with the corresponding regions of the rERG2 subunit (Fig. 7A, top). The response to NFA by these two chimeras resembled WT rERG2, including a 2.4-fold increase in current at the peak of the Itest-Vt relationship (data not shown), a -17-mV shift in Vact and a +8 mV shift in Vinact (Tables 2 and 3). Thus, swapping the VSD from rERG2 to hERG1 effectively transferred NFA sensitivity and ruled out an important role for the pore domain (S5-S6) or C terminus.
|
We next examined the role of the S2 helix and the loops that link adjacent transmembrane helices in the VSD. Introducing the S2 helix or linkers connecting the S1 and S2 helices (L12) or S2 and S3 (L23) from rERG2 into hERG1 failed to transfer high sensitivity to NFA (Fig. 7B, Table 2). The effect of NFA on these chimera channels was very similar to that observed with hERG1. In contrast, transferring the external linker connecting S3 and S4 (L34) from rERG2 into hERG1 created a chimeric channel that enhanced the sensitivity to 1 mM NFA (Fig. 7B, far right). For L34 channels, NFA shifted Vact by -16.1 mV, almost the same as the shift induced in rERG2 (Fig. 7C, Table 2). The effect of NFA on the voltage dependence of inactivation for L34 or the other chimera channels was not appreciably different from hERG1 (Table 3). The differential effects of NFA on ERG channels could conceivably be related to differences in their gating properties. However, this possibility is ruled out because the kinetics and voltage dependence of chimera L34 were nearly the same as WT hERG1.
Specific Residues in the S3-S4 Linker Determined Differential Sensitivity to NFA. The sequence of the S3-S4 linker in hERG1 differs from rERG2 in two aspects (Fig. 8A). First, the initial residue of the S3-S4 linker is a Gly in hERG1 and an Arg in rERG2. Second, the C-terminal end of the S3-S4 linker in hERG1 is shorter, lacking the three Thr residues (Thr triplet) present in rERG2. The L34 chimera (Fig. 7) introduced both these molecular features of rERG2 into hERG1; however, it was not clear whether both or only one of these changes was required to confer high NFA sensitivity. A clue came from the effect of NFA on the WT rERG3 channel, which has a Gly (similar to hERG1) and a Thr triplet (similar to rERG2) (Fig. 8A). rERG3 sensitivity to NFA is intermediate between those of hERG1 and rERG2 (Fig. 8C), suggesting that both structural features were required to obtain the largest response to NFA. To investigate this hypothesis, we constructed hERG1 mutant channels that swapped the Gly for an Arg (G514R) or added three Thr residues (hERG1_TTT). Both alterations increased sensitivity to NFA (Fig. 8B), but neither change alone conferred ERG2-like sensitivity with respect to the shift in Vact (Fig. 8C).
|
The S3-S4 linker of rERG3 differs from rERG2 by only one residue (Gly in place of Arg). As confirmation of the importance of the Arg residue, NFA (1 mM) shifted the Vact of G513R rERG3 by -17 mV (Fig. 8C, Table 2). As a final check of our hypothesis, we examined the effect of NFA on zERG channels. The S3-S4 linker of zERG is not identical to rERG2 (Fig. 8A), but it contains the homologous Arg and the terminal Trp triplet. As predicted, the shift in Vact of zERG by NFA was similar to rERG2 WT channels (Fig. 8C, Table 2). Together, these findings indicate the importance of the S3-S4 linker in the differential sensitivity of ERG channels to NFA.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A chimeric channel approach was used to isolate the S3-S4 linker as the region of the ERG subunit that could account for subtype-specific shifts in activation gating. Site-directed mutagenesis refined the structural basis for high sensitivity to NFA of rERG2 compared with hERG1. Substitution of a Gly with an Arg and insertion of three Thr residues into the S3-S4 linker of hERG1 was sufficient to increase the sensitivity of the channel to match that observed for rERG2. Differences in the sequence of the S3-S4 linker (Gly versus Arg) can also explain differential ERG channel sensitivity to the sea anemone toxin APETx1. This toxin blocks and shifts the gating of hERG1 but not hERG2 channels. The presence of an Arg in the equivalent position as Gly514 in the S3-S4 linker of hERG1 prevents toxin binding. Presumably, NFA does not bind directly to the S3-S4 linker of ERG or other Kv channels. This domain is highly divergent in Kv channels, suggesting that NFA and other fenamates alter the gating of ERG and other Kv channels by interacting with some other component of the VSD. Further studies are needed to determine whether NFA binds to a similar site on all Kv channels.
Our findings do not necessarily implicate an important role for the S3-S4 linker in ERG channel gating. In a previous study of Shaker channels, it was shown that the S3-S4 linker does not appear to be a critical component of voltage sensing. Replacement of the 25-residue linker in Shaker with shorter linkers from Shab (9 residues) or Shal (7 residues) sped the rates of activation and deactivation but caused only minor changes in the voltage dependence of channel activation (Mathur et al., 1997
).
ERG channel activators other than NFA also display subtype-specificity. NS1643 increases the magnitude of ERG1 and ERG2 channel currents. Like NFA, NS1643 causes a leftward shift in the voltage dependence of ERG2 activation (Elmedyb et al., 2007
); however, the activation of ERG1 channels are not affected or slightly rightward shifted (Casis et al., 2006
; Hansen et al., 2006
). Another example is RPR260243, which is a potent activator of ERG1 channels but blocks ERG3 channels (Kang et al., 2005
). Thus, despite the similarities in channel structure and biophysical properties of ERG1, ERG2, and ERG3, it is clear that drugs can have differential effects on these channels. Discovery of even more selective agents should greatly facilitate the investigation of the physiological roles of ERG channel subtypes in a variety of tissues. The development of ERG1-specific agonists will also be important for the development of heart-specific drugs to treat long QT syndrome.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
ABBREVIATIONS: NFA, niflumic acid [2-((3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)amino)-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid]; NS1643, 1,3-bis(2-hydroxy-5-trifluoromethylphenyl)urea; PD-118057, 2-{4-[2-(3,4-dichloro-phenyl)-ethyl]-phenylamino}-benzoic acid; RPR260243, (3R, 4R)-4-(3-(6-methoxyquinolin-4-yl)-3-oxo-propyl)-1-(3-(2,3,5-trifluoro-phenyl)-prop-2-ynyl)-piperidine-3-carboxylic acid; zERG, zebrafish ERG; rERG, rat ERG; hERG, human ERG; bp, base pair(s); VSD, voltage sensor domain; WT, wild-type; I-V, current-voltage; ERG1, human ether-a-go-go-related gene.
The online version of this article (available at http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org) contains supplemental material. ![]()
Address correspondence to: Michael C. Sanguinetti, Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, Department of Physiology, University of Utah, 95 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. E-mail: sanguinetti{at}cvrti.utah.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Casis O, Olesen SP, and Sanguinetti MC (2006) Mechanism of action of a novel human ether-a-go-go-related gene channel activator. Mol Pharmacol 69: 658-665.
Chiesa N, Rosati B, Arcangeli A, Olivotto M, and Wanke E (1997) A novel role for HERG K+ channels: spike-frequency adaptation. J Physiol 501: 313-318.
Elmedyb P, Olesen SP, and Grunnet M (2007) Activation of ERG2 potassium channels by the diphenylurea NS1643. Neuropharmacology 53: 283-294.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gullo F, Ales E, Rosati B, Lecchi M, Masi A, Guasti L, Cano-Abad MF, Arcangeli A, Lopez MG, and Wanke E (2003) ERG K+ channel blockade enhances firing and epinephrine secretion in rat chromaffin cells: the missing link to LQT2-related sudden death? FASEB J 17: 330-332.
Hansen RS, Diness TG, Christ T, Demnitz J, Ravens U, Olesen SP, and Grunnet M (2006) Activation of human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium channels by the diphenylurea 1,3-bis-(2-hydroxy-5-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-urea (NS1643). Mol Pharmacol 69: 266-277.
Kang J, Chen XL, Wang H, Ji J, Cheng H, Incardona J, Reynolds W, Viviani F, Tabart M, and Rampe D (2005) Discovery of a small molecule activator of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) cardiac K+ channel. Mol Pharmacol 67: 827-836.
Lee YT and Wang Q (1999) Inhibition of hKv2.1, a major human neuronal voltagegated K+ channel, by meclofenamic acid. Eur J Pharmacol 378: 349-356.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liantonio A, Picollo A, Babini E, Carbonara G, Fracchiolla G, Loiodice F, Tortorella V, Pusch M, and Camerino DC (2006) Activation and inhibition of kidney CLC-K chloride channels by fenamates. Mol Pharmacol 69: 165-173.
Lu Y, Mahaut-Smith MP, Varghese A, Huang CL, Kemp PR, and Vandenberg JI (2001) Effects of premature stimulation on HERG K+ channels. J Physiol 537: 843-851.
Malykhina AP, Shoeb F, and Akbarali HI (2002) Fenamate-induced enhancement of heterologously expressed HERG currents in Xenopus oocytes. Eur J Pharmacol 452: 269-277.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mathur R, Zheng J, Yan Y, and FJS (1997) Role of the S3-S4 linker in shaker potassium channel activation. J Gen Physiol 109: 191-199.
Ottolia M and Toro L (1994) Potentiation of large conductance KCa channels by niflumic, flufenamic, and mefenamic acids. Biophys J 67: 2272-2279.[Medline]
Peretz A, Degani N, Nachman R, Uziyel Y, Gibor G, Shabat D, and Attali B (2005) Meclofenamic acid and diclofenac, novel templates of KCNQ2/Q3 potassium channel openers, depress cortical neuron activity and exhibit anticonvulsant properties. Mol Pharmacol 67: 1053-1066.
Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, and Flannery BP (1992) Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rosati B, Marchetti P, Crociani O, Lecchi M, Lupi R, Arcangeli A, Olivotto M, and Wanke E (2000) Glucose- and arginine-induced insulin secretion by human pancreatic beta-cells: the role of HERG K+ channels in firing and release. Faseb J 14: 2601-2610.
Sacco T, Bruno A, Wanke E, and Tempia F (2003) Functional roles of an ERG current isolated in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. J Neurophysiol 90: 1817-1828.
Sanguinetti MC, Jiang C, Curran ME, and Keating MT (1995) A mechanistic link between an inherited and an acquired cardiac arrhythmia: HERG encodes the IKr potassium channel. Cell 81: 299-307.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schwarz JR and Bauer CK (2004) Functions of erg K+ channels in excitable cells. J Cell Mol Med 8: 22-30.[Medline]
Scott-Ward TS, Li H, Schmidt A, Cai Z, and Sheppard DN (2004) Direct block of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator Cl- channel by niflumic acid. Mol Membr Biol 21: 27-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shi W, Wymore RS, Wang HS, Pan Z, Cohen IS, McKinnon D, and Dixon JE (1997) Identification of two nervous system-specific members of the erg potassium channel gene family. J Neurosci 17: 9423-9432.
Smith PL, Baukrowitz T, and Yellen G (1996) The inward rectification mechanism of the HERG cardiac potassium channel. Nature 379: 833-836.[CrossRef][Medline]
Spector PS, Curran ME, Zou A, Keating MT, and Sanguinetti MC (1996) Fast inactivation causes rectification of the IKr channel. J Gen Physiol 107: 611-619.
Stühmer W (1992) Electrophysiological recording from Xenopus oocytes. Methods Enzymol 207: 319-339.[Medline]
Trudeau M, Warmke JW, Ganetzky B, and Robertson GA (1995) HERG, A human inward rectifier in the voltage-gated potassium channel family. Science 269: 92-95.
Wang HS, Dixon JE, and McKinnon D (1997) Unexpected and differential effects of Cl- channel blockers on the Kv4.3 and Kv4.2 K+ channels. Implications for the study of the Ito2 current. Circ Res 81: 711-718.
White MM and Aylwin M (1990) Niflumic and flufenamic acids are potent reversible blockers of Ca2+-activated Cl- channels in Xenopus oocytes. Mol Pharmacol 37: 720-724.[Abstract]
Zhou J, Augelli-Szafran CE, Bradley JA, Chen X, Koci BJ, Volberg WA, Sun Z, and Cordes JS (2005) Novel potent human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium channel enhancers and their in vitro antiarrhythmic activity. Mol Pharmacol 68: 876-884.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-N. Wu, H. Peng, B.-S. Chen, Y.-J. Wang, P.-Y. Wu, and M.-W. Lin Potent Activation of Large-Conductance Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels by the Diphenylurea 1,3-Bis-[2-hydroxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]urea (NS1643) in Pituitary Tumor (GH3) Cells Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2008; 74(6): 1696 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||