MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on February 26, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.046540


0026-895X/08/7305-1339-1342$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 73:1339-1342, 2008

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Related Article
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.108.046540v1
73/5/1339    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in MolPharm
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Del'guidice, T.
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Del'guidice, T.
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, J.-M.
Perspective

Messing Up with Traffic: Different Effects of Antipsychotic Agents on Glutamate Receptor Complexes in Vivo

Thomas Del'guidice, and Jean-Martin Beaulieu

Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Cellular Neurobiology Unit, Université Laval, Le Centre de recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard, Québec City, Québec, Canada

Received February 24, 2008; accepted February 26, 2008


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 References
 
Antipsychotic agents are major drugs for human neuropsychiatric conditions including schizophrenia, mood disorders, Tourette syndrome, and Alzheimer's disease. These drugs are divided in two groups—first-generation/typical and second-generation/atypical—on the basis of their propensity to induce extrapyramidal motor side effects. Furthermore, second-generation antipsychotics have been reported to be superior in addressing cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Understanding differences between the mechanism of action of first- and second-generation antipsychotic agents thus represents an interesting opportunity for the development of new compounds having better therapeutic action and less side effects. In this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Fumagalli et al. (p. 1484) report that long-term treatment with the first-generation drug haloperidol interferes with the trafficking of both {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor complexes and associated molecules post-synaptic densities 95 and Ca2+calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in the rat frontal cortex. In contrast, the second-generation drug olanzapine did not affect glutamate receptor trafficking. The action of haloperidol on glutamate receptor trafficking in specific brain regions may contribute to the low efficacy of this drug on cognitive deficits and to the development of side effects. Overall, antipsychotics have been shown to act upon multiple signaling mechanisms (e.g., cAMP-protein kinase A, βArrestin 2-Akt-GSK-3, and phospholipase C-inositol-protein kinase C pathways), mostly by blocking D2-class dopamine receptors (first generation) or D2-class dopamine and 5-HT2 serotonin receptors (second generation). Identification of specific pathways by which haloperidol affects glutamate receptor trafficking may thus represent an important next step toward the development of better antipsychotic drugs.


Since the introduction of chlorpromazine in the 1950s, antipsychotic agents have become the principal therapeutic intervention for schizophrenia. Moreover, these drugs are sometimes used for the management of other neuropsychiatric conditions, such as mood disorders, Tourette syndrome, and Alzheimer disease. Antipsychotic agents are divided in two broad categories under the basis of their effects and side effects (Meltzer, 1991Go; Kapur and Remington, 2001Go). First-generation (FGA) or typical antipsychotic agents such as chlorpromazine or haloperidol are associated with the development of extrapyramidal side effects. In contrast, second-generation (SGA) or atypical antipsychotics (e.g., clozapine, olanzapine) have a lower incidence of extrapyramidal side effects while still exerting therapeutic action. Some studies have also indicated that SGAs may be superior to FGA in improving cognitive deficits in persons with schizophrenia (Keefe et al., 2006Go; Di Pietro and Seamans, 2007Go). However, SGAs are not without problems as their administration can lead to metabolic complications such as diabetes and obesity (Haupt and Kane, 2007Go). Clozapine can also induce agranulocytosis (Idänpään-Heikkilä et al., 1975Go), a potentially fatal condition, thus requiring close supervision of patients' blood granulocyte levels. Furthermore, a recent large scale Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) has challenged the overall clinical superiority of SGAs over FGAs in clinical practice (Lieberman et al., 2005Go).

In this context, understanding the molecular mechanisms by which SGAs and FGAs exert their therapeutic action and induce specific side effects is of a tremendous importance for the development of much needed new compounds with antipsychotic actions. At the receptor levels, FGAs are potent antagonists of D2-class dopamine (DA) receptors (Creese et al., 1976Go) while SGAs are weaker D2-class receptor antagonists while also blocking 5-HT2 serotonin (5-HT) receptors (Meltzer, 1991Go; Roth et al., 2004Go; Sheng and Hoogenraad, 2007Go). Recent evidence has shown that some signaling molecules, notably the serine/threonine kinase glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3), can be regulated in a similar fashion by both SGAs and FGAs (Beaulieu et al., 2007Go). However, the link between these observations and the pharmacological actions of antipsychotics has not been clearly elucidated.


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Model of the haloperidol and olanzapine effects on ionotropic glutamate receptors trafficking. Signaling pathways directly affected by D2 and 5-HT2 receptors are also indicated.

 
Ionotropic glutamate receptor complexes AMPA and NMDA are potentially important indirect targets for antipsychotics. These receptors are heterotetrameric ion channels whose expression and trafficking are tightly regulated by complex networks of scaffolding proteins and signaling molecules (Sheng and Hoogenraad, 2007Go). Noncompetitive NMDA/glutamate receptor antagonists, such as ketamine and phencyclidine, induce psychotic-like responses in human as well as in primate and rodent animal models (Sharp et al., 2001Go). Furthermore, mice expressing only 5% of the normal level of the NMDA receptor subunit NR1 (NR1KD mice) also display "schizophrenia-like" behaviors, such as enhanced stereotypy and locomotion as well as deficits in social and reproductive behaviors (Mohn et al., 1999Go). Importantly, these behavioral abnormalities can be ameliorated by antipsychotics in both NR1KD mice and in rodents treated with noncompetitive NMDA/glutamate receptor antagonists. This suggests that antipsychotics may indirectly affect the regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptor complexes by blocking DA and/or 5-HT receptor functions.

Few investigations have focused on the impact of antipsychotics on ionotropic glutamate receptor complexes trafficking in the brain. In an article published in this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Fumagalli et al. (2008Go) used subcellular fractioning of brain tissue to examine the expression and trafficking of glutamate receptor complex proteins to post-synaptic densities (PSD) in response to chronic treatment with antipsychotics (Fumagalli et al., 2008Go). The authors administered repeated treatment of two antipsychotics, haloperidol and olanzapine, in adult rats. They found that the SGA olanzapine does not affect the expression or trafficking of NMDA receptor complexes in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. In contrast, long-term administration of the FGA haloperidol leads to reduced trafficking of NMDA receptor subunits NR1 and NR2A as well as AMPA receptor subunit GluR1 to PSDs in the rat frontal cortex. These finding expend a recent report by this same group of a similar reductions in NMDA receptor synaptic expression in the striatum in response to long-term haloperidol treatment (Gardoni et al., 2008Go).

The authors also examined the impact of long-term haloperidol treatment on the expression and trafficking of proteins associated to ionotropic glutamate receptor complexes. The Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMKII) is a multimeric serine/threonine kinase involved in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and glutamate receptor trafficking (Hudmon and Schulman, 2002Go). Furthermore, it has been suggested that CaMKII may also act as a protein scaffold for the recruitment of other proteins to PSDs (Bayer et al., 2006Go). One important step in the regulation of CaMKII is its autophosphorylation on threonine 286 (thr286) that increases its affinity for calmodulin, thus resulting in an augmentation of kinase activity. Fumigalli et al. (2008) report that long-term haloperidol treatment interferes with the trafficking of phospho-thr286-CaMKII to PSD. Furthermore, haloperidol reduces the interaction of CaMKII with the NMDA subunit NR2B.

Scaffolding postsynaptic protein of the MAGUKs family (PSD95, SAP 102, chapsyn-110/PSD-93, and SAP97) (Garner and Kindler, 1996Go) interacts with NMDA receptor complexes (Sheng and Hoogenraad, 2007Go). It is noteworthy that reduced expression of the MAGUK protein PSD95 has been identified as a common outcome of DA receptor over stimulation in four different pharmacological or genetic models of altered monoamine neurotransmitter functions (Yao et al., 2004Go). In these models, a reduction of PSD95 expression is associated with altered synaptic plasticity in the striatum and with behavioral sensitization to DA drugs. Fumagalli et al. (2008Go) report that long-term haloperidol also prevents the normal trafficking of PSD95 to the PSDs but does not affect its expression.

Taken together, the findings of Fumagalli et al. (2008Go) reveal that long-term administration of FGAs induces a deficit in the trafficking of glutamate ionotropic receptors and their associated regulatory proteins to PSD in the frontal cortex (Fig. 1). This would result in a reduction of both AMPA and NMDA receptor synaptic receptor functions in this brain region and in the development of cognitive impairments in response to haloperidol. Theses findings support previous reports that long-term haloperidol treatment induces working memory impairments in nonhuman primates (Castner et al., 2000Go). It is noteworthy that haloperidol had no effect on the trafficking of glutamate receptor subunits in the hippocampus, thus suggesting that its negative effect on cognition may be restricted to a subset of brain regions. This region specificity may provide a way out of an apparent paradox between the authors' observation that an FGA interferes with ionotropic glutamate receptor trafficking and the postulated implication of reduced NMDA receptor functions in the pathology of schizophrenia.

The results also suggest that olanzapine and potentially other SGAs do not reduce the trafficking of glutamate receptor complexes to PSD in the frontal cortex. This may provide a molecular basis for the reported clinical superiority of some SGAs in addressing cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Furthermore, because AMPA and NMDA are also involved in the regulation of motor functions, alterations of glutamate receptor trafficking by FGAs may also contribute to their enhanced propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects (Gardoni et al., 2008Go). However, before any definitive conclusions, the study would have to be extended to include multiple different FGAs and SGAs tested at multiple doses. This can be particularly important because recent clinical evidences have shown that when given at low doses, haloperidol induces fewer side effects but still exerts its therapeutic action in patients with schizophrenia (Oosthuizen et al., 2004Go).

Another question raised by these results is the mechanism by which haloperidol regulates ionotropic glutamate trafficking. Haloperidol is believed to exert most of its effect by acting as a potent DA D2-class receptor antagonist (Creese et al., 1976Go). These receptors are coupled to at least two independent signaling pathways (Fig. 1) in the adult brain (Beaulieu et al., 2007Go). A first pathway involves the activation of G{alpha}i/o G proteins, which results in the regulation of ion channels and in the inhibition of adenylate cyclases (Missale et al., 1998Go). Blockade of this pathway by haloperidol increases the production of cAMP leading to an activation of PKA. It is noteworthy that both NMDA and AMPA receptors contain PKA phosphorylation sites that have been shown to regulate their function and trafficking (Esteban et al., 2003Go).

D2-class receptors also regulate the Akt/GSK-3 signaling pathway (Fig. 1) through a cAMP-independent mechanism (Beaulieu et al., 2004Go). Upon activation, D2 receptors induce the formation of a signaling complex composed of the protein kinase Akt, the scaffolding protein β-arrestin 2, and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). The formation of this complex facilitates the inactivation of Akt by PP2A (Beaulieu et al., 2005Go). Because Akt is a negative regulator of GSK-3, inhibition of Akt in response to D2 receptor stimulation leads to an activation of GSK-3 (Beaulieu et al., 2008Go). It is noteworthy that recent evidence has implicated GSK-3 in the regulation of long-term plasticity in hippocampal slice preparation, thus suggesting a potential role for this kinase in the regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptor functions (Peineau et al., 2007Go).

Finally, regulation of glutamate receptor trafficking may also be independent from D2 DA receptors. For instance, coadministration of DA D1 receptor agonists can prevent the development of short-term memory deficit in response to long-term haloperidol in nonhuman primates (Castner et al., 2000Go). Because haloperidol can act as weak D1 receptor antagonists (Roth et al., 2004Go), it is possible that regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptor trafficking by D1 receptors (Cepeda and Levine, 2006Go) may also explain some of the effects observed by Fumagalli et al. (2008Go).

In summary, the article by Fumagalli et al. (2008Go) provides new avenues to examine the differential effects and mechanism of action of two important classes of antipsychotic drugs used in the management of schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric conditions. Furthermore, the authors have shown that a single drug, haloperidol, can exert different effects on ionotropic glutamate receptors between the frontal cortex and the hippocampus. Such differences between brain regions suggests possible differences in the regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptor trafficking between neuronal cell types and underscores the importance of conducting molecular studies in vivo.


    Acknowledgements
 
J.-M.B. is the recipient of a Canadian research Chair in Molecular Psychiatry and of a Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) career development award.


    Footnotes
 
Please see the related article on page 1484.

ABBREVIATIONS: FGA, first-generation antipsychotic; SGA, second-generation antipsychotic; DA, dopamine; 5-HT, serotonin; GSK-3, glycogen synthase kinase 3; AMPA, {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; PSD, postsynaptic density; CaMKII, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase; PP2A, protein phosphatase 2A.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Jean-Martin Beaulieu, Cellular Neurobiology Unit, CRULRG, 2601 Chemin de la Canardière, Suite F-6500, Beauport (Québec) G1J 2G3, Canada. E-mail: martin.beaulieu{at}crulrg.ulaval.ca


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 References
 
Bayer KU, LeBel E, McDonald GL, O'Leary H, Schulman H, and De Koninck P (2006) Transition from reversible to persistent binding of CaMKII to postsynaptic sites and NR2B. J Neurosci 26: 1164-1174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beaulieu JM, Gainetdinov RR, and Caron MG (2007) The Akt-GSK-3 signaling cascade in the actions of dopamine. Trends Pharmacol Sci 28: 166-172.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beaulieu JM, Marion S, Rodriguiz RM, Medvedev IO, Sotnikova TD, Ghisi V, Wetsel WC, Lefkowitz RJ, Gainetdinov RR, and Caron MG (2008) A beta-arrestin 2 signaling complex mediates lithium action on behavior. Cell 132: 125-136.[Medline]

Beaulieu JM, Sotnikova TD, Marion S, Lefkowitz RJ, Gainetdinov RR, and Caron MG (2005) An Akt/beta-arrestin 2/PP2A signaling complex mediates dopaminergic neurotransmission and behavior. Cell 122: 261-273.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beaulieu JM, Sotnikova TD, Yao WD, Kockeritz L, Woodgett JR, Gainetdinov RR, and Caron MG (2004) Lithium antagonizes dopamine-dependent behaviors mediated by an AKT/glycogen synthase kinase 3 signaling cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 5099-5104,.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Castner SA, Williams GV, and Goldman-Rakic PS (2000) Reversal of antipsychotic-induced working memory deficits by short-term dopamine D1 receptor stimulation. Science 287: 2020-2022.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cepeda C and Levine MS (2006) Where do you think you are going? The NMDA-D1 receptor trap. Sci STKE 2006: pe20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Creese I, Burt DR, and Snyder SH (1976) Dopamine receptor binding predicts clinical and pharmacological potencies of antischizophrenic drugs. Science 192: 481-483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Di Pietro NC and Seamans JK (2007) Dopamine and serotonin interactions in the prefrontal cortex: insights on antipsychotic drugs and their mechanism of action. Pharmacopsychiatry 40 (Suppl 1): S27-S33.[CrossRef][Medline]

Esteban JA, Shi SH, Wilson C, Nuriya M, Huganir RL, and Malinow R (2003) PKA phosphorylation of AMPA receptor subunits controls synaptic trafficking underlying plasticity. Nat Neurosci 6: 136-143.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fumagalli F, Frasca A, Racagni G and Riva MA (2008) Dynamic regulation of glutamatergic postsynaptic activity in rat prefrontal cortex by repeated administration of antipsychotic drugs. Mol Pharmacol 73: 1484-1490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gardoni F, Frasca A, Zianni E, Riva MA, Di Luca M, and Fumagalli F (2008) Repeated treatment with haloperidol, but not olanzapine, alters synaptic NMDA receptor composition in rat striatum. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol, in press.

Garner CC and Kindler S (1996) Synaptic proteins and the assembly of synaptic junctions. Trends Cell Biol 6: 429-433.[CrossRef][Medline]

Haupt DW and Kane JM (2007) Metabolic risks and effects of atypical antipsychotic treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 68: e24.[Medline]

Hudmon A and Schulman H (2002) Neuronal Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II: the role of structure and autoregulation in cellular function. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 473-510.[CrossRef][Medline]

Idänpään-Heikkilä J, Alhava E, Olkinuora M, and Palva I (1975) Letter: Clozapine and agranulocytosis. Lancet 2: 611.[Medline]

Kapur S, and Remington G (2001) Atypical antipsychotics: new directions and new challenges in the treatment of schizophrenia. Annu Rev Med 52: 503-517.[CrossRef][Medline]

Keefe RS, Seidman LJ, Christensen BK, Hamer RM, Sharma T, Sitskoorn MM, Rock SL, Woolson S, Tohen M, Tollefson GD, et al. (2006) Long-term neurocognitive effects of olanzapine or low-dose haloperidol in first-episode psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 59: 97-105.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis SM, Davis CE, Lebowitz BD, et al. (2005) Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med 353: 1209-1223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Meltzer HY (1991) The mechanism of action of novel antipsychotic drugs. Schizophr Bull 17: 263-287.

Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW, Jaber M, and Caron MG (1998) Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 78: 189-225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mohn AR, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG, and Koller BH (1999) Mice with reduced NMDA receptor expression display behaviors related to schizophrenia. Cell 98: 427-436.[CrossRef][Medline]

Oosthuizen P, Emsley R, Jadri Turner H, and Keyter N (2004) A randomized, controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of low and high doses of haloperidol in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 7: 125-131.[CrossRef][Medline]

Peineau S, Taghibiglou C, Bradley C, Wong TP, Liu L, Lu J, Lo E, Wu D, Saule E, Bouschet T, et al. (2007) LTP inhibits LTD in the hippocampus via regulation of GSK3beta. Neuron 53: 703-717.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roth BL, Sheffler DJ, and Kroeze WK (2004) Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 353-359.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sharp FR, Tomitaka M, Bernaudin M, and Tomitaka S (2001) Psychosis: pathological activation of limbic thalamocortical circuits by psychomimetics and schizophrenia? Trends Neurosci 24: 330-334.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sheng M, and Hoogenraad CC (2007) The postsynaptic architecture of excitatory synapses: a more quantitative view. Annu Rev Biochem 76: 823-847.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yao WD, Gainetdinov RR, Arbuckle MI, Sotnikova TD, Cyr M, Beaulieu JM, Torres GE, Grant SG, and Caron MG (2004) Identification of PSD-95 as a regulator of dopamine-mediated synaptic and behavioral plasticity. Neuron 41: 625-638.[CrossRef][Medline]


Related articles in MolPharm:

Dynamic Regulation of Glutamatergic Postsynaptic Activity in Rat Prefrontal Cortex by Repeated Administration of Antipsychotic Drugs
Fabio Fumagalli, Angelisa Frasca, Giorgio Racagni, and Marco Andrea Riva
MolPharm 2008 73: 1484-1490. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Related Article
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.108.046540v1
73/5/1339    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in MolPharm
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Del'guidice, T.
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Del'guidice, T.
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, J.-M.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics