|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Hematology, Institut Universitari d'Investigacions en Ciències de la Salut (IUNICS) (J.M.S., A.G., M.N., A.S., J.C.A., A.G., J.B) and Departments of Pathology (C.S.), Pharmacy (J.G.), and Oncology (J.M), University Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; and Group of Clinical and Molecular Onco-Hematology, Department of Biology, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (J.M.S., A.G., R.A., T.R., L. S.-M., J.M., O.V.)
Received for publication November 9, 2007.
Accepted for publication March 19, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Likewise, tumor cells are able to resist the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy by achieving a quiescent, nonproliferating state that can be reversed after a variable period, thus resulting in treatment failure. A novel therapeutic approach aimed at controlling the tumoral cells that resist chemotherapy is based on the induction of cancer cell differentiation. The so-called "differentiation therapy" is an emergent area in cancer research and involves the reversion of a cancer cell to a more mature phenotype with no proliferative potential (Marchal et al., 2006
). Several compounds, such as butyrates, retinoids, and vitamin D, are able to induce differentiation in colon and other cancer cells (Spira and Carducci, 2003
). In this context, it has been demonstrated that certain chemotherapeutic antimetabolites, such as the folate analog methotrexate (MTX) and the deoxycytidine analog gemcitabine (GE), besides blocking cell proliferation, have a certain potential to induce differentiation in various human cancer cell lines (Kimura et al., 2004
; Bierau et al., 2006
; Singh et al., 2006
). Both these properties were attributed mainly to its inhibitory effect on purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis and DNA synthesis.
A pivotal pathway related to differentiation of cells, as well as many other cellular functions, such as proliferation, survival, and development, is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, composed of three subfamilies: extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), p38 MAPK, and c-jun N-terminal kinase (Seger and Krebs, 1995
; Nishimoto and Nishida, 2006
). The ERK subfamily of MAPKs promotes cellular survival by successive phosphorylation of MEK, ERK, and downstream substrates such as Elk-1 and p90RSK. Moreover, ERK is implicated in the regulation of the transcription factor c-Myc, a nuclear protein blocking cell differentiation, including several types of cancer cells (Chen et al., 2006
; Vita and Henriksson, 2006
). In this context, it has been very recently discussed that inhibition of this MAPK pathway could be a novel target for antitumoral treatments (Kohno and Pouyssegur, 2006
).
We have recently observed that treatment with the antimetabolites MTX or GE induced a sustained phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in NSCLC A549 cells. Surprisingly, most of the treated cells were nevertheless found in a nonproliferative and also nondifferentiated state of the cell cycle, known as quiescent or G0/G1. Taking these observations as a starting point, we demonstrated that A549 cells can revert their neoplastic characteristics and differentiate under MTX and GE treatment, but only when the accompanying ERK/c-Myc pathway activation is inhibited. For this reason, sustained activation of the ERK pathway must be considered an antitumoral drug resistance mechanism, avoiding differentiation of the MTX- and GE-treated NSCLC A549 cells by stabilizing c-Myc levels. To extend the knowledge about the molecular mechanism(s) involved in this type of tumoral resistance is of great clinical relevance, because it would allow the design of new therapeutical strategies based on the use of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, such as antimetabolites (e.g., MTX and GE), in combination with inhibitors of the MAPK pathway.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Cycle Analysis. Analysis of the cell cycle by flow cytometry was performed on A549 cells as described previously (Martínez et al., 2005a
). Cell populations in the different phases of the cell cycle (sub-G1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M) were determined based on their DNA content in a Epics XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).
Gene Silencing by Small Interfering RNA Transfection. A549 cells were transfected with validated small interfering RNA (siRNA) duplex oligonucleotides targeting human c-Myc mRNA (5 nM) (Cell Signaling Technology) by using HiPerFect transfection reagent (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, 1.5 µl of siRNA (2 µM stock concentration) was incubated in the presence of 3 µl of HiPerFect transfection reagent in 100 µl of serum-free RPMI 1640 medium plus antibiotics/antimycotics. After 10 min of incubation to allow the formation of transfection complexes, A549 cells (0.5 x 105 cells) resuspended in 500 µl of RPMI 1640 medium (containing serum and antibiotics/antimycotics) were mixed with the siRNA-HiPerFect reagent transfection complexes or with HiPerFect reagent alone (Mock) into the well and incubated for 48 h. After this time, vehicle (siRNA c-Myc) or 10 µM MTX (siRNA c-Myc + MTX) was added to the cells and incubated for an additional 96 h.
Immunoblot Analysis. Preparation of cell extracts, protein assays, and quantitative immunoblotting were performed as described previously (Martínez et al., 2005b
) with the following change: sodium orthovanadate and cantharidin were both added to the ice-cold lysis buffer at a final concentration of 1 µM. Quantification was performed by image analysis, using standard curves with four points (i.e., total protein loaded versus integrated optical density) of different protein contents loaded on the same gel as described previously (Martínez et al., 2005b
). Primary polyclonal antibodies, anti-poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (anti-PARP; diluted 1:1000), anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK (P-ERK1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204; diluted 1:1000), anti-p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2; diluted 1:1000), and anti-c-Myc (diluted 1:500; 70 kDa) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Primary monoclonal anti-gelsolin (93 kDa) was from BD Biosciences Transduction Laboratories (Heidelberg, Germany), whereas polyclonal anti-surfactant protein A (SP-A) (35 kDa) and protein C (SP-C) (precursor SP-C 21 kDa) antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).
Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction of ERK1 mRNA Expression. Total RNA was isolated from 5 x 105 A549 cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Primer design and optimization was carried out using the Biology WorkBench (http://workbench.sdsc.edu) and the Oligoanalyzer program (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) and resulted in the following sequences: ERK1: forward, 5'-ACTATGACCCGACGGATGAG-3'; reverse, 5'-CTAACAGTCTGGCGGGAGAG-3; β-Glucuronidase (GUS): forward, 5'-GAAAATATGTGGTTGGAGAGCTCATT-3'; reverse, 5'-CCGAGTGAAGATCCCCTTTTTA-3'. Real-time polymerase chain reaction quantification was performed using the LightCycler System (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), including a melting curve analysis of the final products. Expression results were normalized according to the housekeeping gene expression (β-glucuronidase).
|
|
Ultrastructural Study. A549 cells were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, postfixed with aqueous 1.25% osmium tetroxide, stained with 4% aqueous uranyl acetate, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and embedded in Polybed (epoxy resin). An ultramicrotome (Reichert-Jung Ultra Cut) was used to prepare ultrathin sections of the cells, which were then double-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The sections were then observed using a transmission electron microscope (Zeiss 902 electron microscope) with an acceleration voltage of 100 kV. All reagents for electron microscopy were purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Ft. Washington, PA) except Polybed (Polysciences, Warrington, PA).
Cell Proliferation Assays. To study the effect of the withdrawal of MTX and GE or MTX and GE plus U0126 on cell proliferation, cells were recovered after treatment with vehicle (control), MTX (0.1 and 10 µM), GE (0.1 and 1 µM), or the combination MTX plus U0126 and GE plus U0126 (10 µM) for 96 h, diluted, and reseeded at a density of 10 cells/well in 24-well plates with 0.5 ml of culture medium. After 10 and 20 days of cell culture, cells were counted using an automated cell counter (Advia 120; Bayer Corp., Diagnostics Div., Tarrytown, NY).
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We next set out to analyze whether the total cellular level of the transcription factor c-Myc, a downstream target of the MEK/ERK pathway, was also influenced by these antimetabolites. Although MTX (10 µM) and GE (1 µM) treatments for 96 h induced sustained phosphorylation of ERK1/2, they decreased total c-Myc protein levels by 42.5 ± 5.4% and 65.9 ± 8.1%, respectively (Fig. 2B). Still, combination of MTX or GE and U0126 (10 µM) further decreased by 1.81-and 1.27-fold the MTX- and GE-induced reductions of c-Myc protein levels, leading to a total decrease of approximately 82% compared with vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 2B). The effect of the inhibition of ERK phosphorylation on proliferation and phenotype alterations in vehicle- and antimetabolite-treated A549 cells was then studied. As found with MTX (10 µM) or GE (1 µM) alone, both antimetabolites in combination with U0126 (10 µM) for 96 h also inhibited cell proliferation (inhibition of 19, 95, and 94% with U0126, MTX, or GE alone and 92% with MTX or GE plus U0126, compared with vehicle-treated cells), which was additionally confirmed by immunocytochemistry evaluating the level of the nuclear factor Ki-67. Expression of nuclear factor Ki-67, commonly associated with increased proliferation, decreased in cells treated with MTX alone or in combination with U0126, compared with vehicle- or U0126-treated cells (data not shown). In particular, MTX or GE in combination with U0126 induced the ubiquitous emergence of a morphological cell phenotype similar to an epithelial cell, with a more abundant, flattened cytoplasm and increased cytoplasmic/nuclear ratio. The analysis of several proteins considered to be molecular markers of cell differentiation was performed to determine whether these morphological changes were signs of differentiation. Taking into account that lung tissue is usually composed of various epithelial cell lineages, and that no collectively valid marker for the differentiated state of these cells has so far been described, we examined the general differentiation marker gelsolin (Hoshikawa et al., 1994
) and the specific markers of undifferentiated progenitor lineage for the pulmonary alveolar epithelium (i.e., type II pneumocytes), surfactant protein A (SP-A) and C (SP-C) (Betz et al., 1995
). The cellular levels of gelsolin in A549 cells treated with MTX (10 µM) or U0126 (10 µM) for 96 h were moderately augmented by 76 and 81%, respectively, compared with the control cells. However, the combination of MTX and U0126 dramatically increased the level of this differentiation marker by 4-fold (Fig. 3A). Similar to MTX, treatment with GE (1 µM) for 96 h increased the level of gelsolin by 4-fold, whereas its combination with U0126 further increased the expression of this protein by 25%. Furthermore, the SP-A and SP-C markers decreased in growth arrested A549 cells treated with MTX (reduction of 31 and 46%, respectively) and GE (reduction of 42 and 66%, respectively) alone and further down-regulated in combination with U0126 (reduction of 48 and 59% with MTX plus U0126 and 69 and 85% with GE plus U0126, respectively), compared with vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 3, B and C). Finally, ultrastructural studies by electron microscopy showed that combination of MTX and U0126 induced the appearance of cytoplasmic multilamellar bodies (myelinosomes) (Fig. 4), typical secretory granules in normal type II alveolar epithelium cells, which were not observed in vehicle- and only singularly detectable in MTX-treated cells (Fig. 4). This inverse relation is probably caused by the fact that in differentiated cells, the production of both surfactant proteins occurs in a more organized way. Therefore, delocalized high-level expression of these proteins might be stopped and replaced by a structured physiological production restricted to myelinosomes. Together, these data suggest that sustained ERK1/2 phosphorylation in cell growth arrested A549 cells impaired MTX- and GE-induced cell differentiation, most probably by maintaining a certain level of c-Myc expression.
|
To corroborate that maintenance of c-Myc expression by sustained ERK1/2 phosphorylation prevents these cells from MTX-induced differentiation, A549 cells were transiently transfected with a siRNA against c-Myc for 48 h, and then for an additional 96 h with 10 µM MTX. As expected, siRNA c-Myc-transfected A549 cells expressed reduced levels of c-Myc protein at the end of treatment (reduction of 47%), and a concomitant increase of ERK1/2 phosphorylation (increase of 354 ± 52% and 221 ± 51% in P-ERK 1 and 2, respectively) compared with mock-transfected, vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 5). MTX treatment further increased the phosphorylation levels of these two proteins by 4- and 7-fold while decreasing their total levels. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed that silencing of c-Myc expression alone did not alter ERK1 transcription (reduction of 13%). In contrast, its combination with MTX reduced transcription of ERK1 by 54% compared with mock-transfected, vehicle-treated cells, which could be an explanation for the reduced total ERK levels found by immunoblot. Nevertheless, c-Myc expression was found to be almost completely down-regulated (reduction of 90%) (Fig. 5), which was similar to the simultaneous treatment of MTX and U0126 in nontransfected vehicle-treated A549 cells (Fig. 2B). In parallel, MTX significantly increased gelsolin expression by approximately 4-fold and decreased SP-A levels by nearly 70% compared with mock-transfected A549 cells (Fig. 5). Moreover, as shown in Fig. 6, detection of the epithelial marker cytokeratin by immunocytochemistry highlighted that the majority of A549 cells transfected with siRNA c-Myc showed differentiated morphology to normal epithelial cells under MTX treatment (Fig. 6F). In contrast, MTX alone induced differentiation in only a very low percentage of nontransfected A549 cells (Fig. 6B), whereas its combination with U0126 enhanced this effect, inducing differentiation in practically all A549 cells (Fig. 6D). Together, these results confirm that ERK-stabilized c-Myc protein expression plays a central role in the resistance of arrested A549 cells to MTX-induced differentiation. The cell proliferation rate after withdrawal of these compounds at the end of treatment was studied to investigate whether the differentiation provoked by the simultaneously combination of antimetabolites and U0126 was irreversible. A549 cells treated with both antimetabolites or U0126 alone for 96 h showed increased cell number after drug withdrawal in a similar time-dependent manner to (0.1 µM U0126 and MTX; Fig. 7A) or somewhat slower than (10 µM MTX and GE; Fig. 7, B-D) control cells. This indicates that they relatively quickly regained their neoplastic properties after antimetabolite treatment. In contrast, cells treated simultaneously with MTX (10 µM) or GE plus U0126 preserved their epithelial-like phenotype and did not show an increase in number even 3 weeks after end of treatment (Fig. 7, B-D).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Chang and Szabo, 2000
The antiproliferative effect of MTX and GE in A549 cells was paradoxically accompanied by a sustained activation of the ERK1/2 pathway, which one would expect instead to be deactivated under growth arrest conditions. This observation, together with the fact that both antitumoral compounds were generally able to induce differentiation in a small percentage of cells, suggested that sustained ERK1/2 activation might be a resistance mechanism in A549 cells, counteracting the differentiation process. In fact, inhibition of MTX- and GE-induced sustained ERK1/2 phosphorylation by the specific MEK inhibitor U0126 provoked differentiation to an epithelial-like cell phenotype in practically all cells. This event was reflected by: 1) a 3-fold increased expression of the general differentiation marker gelsolin, together with a further decrease of SP-A and SP-C levels compared with MTX and GE alone; 2) the induction of cytoplasmic multilamellar bodies (myelinosomes), typical secretory granules present in differentiated type II alveolar cells, which were hardly generated by MTX alone; and, finally, 3) the reorganization of the differentiation marker cytokeratin in all cells. It is noteworthy that administration of the specific MEK inhibitor alone neither changed the levels of the mentioned specific differentiation markers nor induced differentiation in any of the cells. This clearly demonstrates that suppression of ERK1/2 phosphorylation is not a general key to inducing differentiation in A549 cells but that sustained overactivation of this pathway must be considered a resistance mechanism to the differentiation potential of MTX and GE. Accordingly, Singh et al. (2006
) have recently demonstrated that MTX is able to induce differentiation in a small percentage of colon cancer cells and that inhibition of the MAPK/ERK pathway in combination with MTX also enhanced the amount of differentiation in these cells.
Besides the sustained ERK1/2 phosphorylation, we detected a down-regulation of c-Myc protein expression under MTX and GE treatment, which was nearly complete by the simultaneous administration of the inhibitor U0126 (Fig. 2B). The c-myc protooncogene encodes the nuclear transcription factor c-Myc that is crucially involved in cell-fate decisions, including proliferation, apoptosis, and cell differentiation (Henriksson and Luscher, 1996
). Deregulated c-Myc expression is implicated in the development of a wide spectrum of human cancers, and c-Myc has therefore been proposed as molecular target for cancer treatment (Vita and Henriksson, 2006
). Accordingly, overexpression of c-Myc is observed in NSCLC (Gazzeri et al., 1991
; Lorenz et al., 1994
), and suppression of c-Myc expression seems to be necessary for differentiation of hepatocellular carcinomas in normal-appearing liver cells (Shachaf et al., 2004
). Thus, reduction of total c-Myc levels in A549 cells treated with MTX or GE alone could, in part, explain the inhibition of growth and the modulation of differentiation markers, demonstrating that these chemotherapeutic antimetabolites were generally able to trigger differentiation in these cells. The exact mechanisms by which these drugs are able to lower c-Myc levels in A549 cells have not yet been clarified. Chu et al. (1995
) have demonstrated that thymidylate synthase (TS), an enzyme involved in the de novo biosynthesis of the pyrimidine 2'-deoxyribonucleotide thymidine monophosphate, directly interacts with the c-myc mRNA in human colon cancer cells, thereby inhibiting its translational efficiency. Moreover, TS levels are regulated by its own product through a negative autoregulatory mechanism. Therefore, it might be possible that inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase and TS by MTX (McGuire, 2003
; Kimura et al., 2004
), disturbs the expression of c-Myc by the sequestration of its mRNA in A549 cells through depletion of intracellular dTMP and consequently increased TS levels. On the other hand, MTX and GE also interfere in the metabolism of nucleotides (i.e., ATP and GTP), which, besides DNA synthesis, also participate in the regulation of other important cellular functions, such as protein synthesis, signal transduction via GTP-binding proteins, and cAMP synthesis, among others. Hence, a relatively small variation of these nucleotide pools may have a critical impact on the global regulation of cell growth and differentiation by modulating the activity of key signal transduction pathways and proteins involved in these cellular events, as shown in other cancer cells (Bierau et al., 2006
; Singh et al., 2006
).
Accordingly, it has been shown that ERK pathway activation can enhance c-Myc protein stability through phosphorylation of serine 62 by activated ERK1/2, blocking its proteosome-mediated degradation (Lutterbach and Hann, 1994
). The role of c-Myc in counteracting the effect of MTX in our cell system was further substantiated by demonstrating that transient inactivation of c-Myc expression with the corresponding siRNA allowed MTX alone, independently of the status of ERK1/2 phosphorylation, to induce differentiation in a manner and extent similar to that shown by the simultaneous combination of MTX and U0126 (Figs. 5 and 6). Thus, down-regulation of c-Myc levels seems to be the key regulator addressed by the sustained phosphorylated ERK pathway. However, c-Myc inactivation alone by siRNA in the absence of MTX did not initiate this process. It is noteworthy that our results contrast to the prevalent opinion that ERK1/2 activation is always associated with cell proliferation or differentiation, including in A549 cells (Keshamouni et al., 2004
). Silencing of c-Myc expression in the presence of MTX decreased ERK1 transcription, being a possible explanation for the reduced total ERK1 levels shown by immunoblot (Fig. 5). Increasing phosphorylation levels of ERK while reducing total protein levels is not necessarily contradictory. Because only a small fraction of total ERK is normally phosphorylated, this fraction might increase even when total ERK levels decrease. It is important to note that ERK phosphorylation in cells transfected with siRNA c-Myc and treated with MTX was approximately 5-fold higher than could be induced by treatment of nontransfected cells with MTX plus U0126. It is possible that ERK transcription is inhibited in response to its sustained phosphorylation as a consequence of the complete down-regulation of c-Myc expression induced by combination of silencing c-Myc and MTX. Moreover, we cannot exclude the possibility that this excessive sustained phosphorylation also induced a degradation process of total ERK levels over time.
The most important result perhaps is the fact that once A549 cells were differentiated by MTX or GE plus U0126, they neither proliferated nor reverted their morphological appearance after withdrawal of the compounds. This demonstrates that, in contrast to MTX, GE, or U0126 alone, only deactivation of the ERK1/2 pathway during antimetabolite treatment was able to induce an irreversible and permanent differentiation state of these cells.
Our work demonstrates that non-small-cell lung cancer cells preserve their capacity to revert into a permanently differentiated phenotype under long-term chemotherapeutic treatment with the antimetabolites MTX and GE. Furthermore, our results reveal that the maintenance of a certain threshold of c-Myc expression through sustained ERK1/2 activation represents the molecular mechanism that confers resistance to MTX- and GE-induced cell differentiation in A549 cells. In the light of these findings, sustained ERK1/2 activation might represent a general resistance mechanism for tumoral cells to avoid differentiation during MTX or similar chemotherapeutic drugs. Moreover, it could be possible to combine MTX, GE, or other antimetabolites with drugs able to inhibit, directly or indirectly, the MAPK ERK pathway or c-Myc, such as antitumoral tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Taken together, these data provide a novel molecular basis for therapeutic strategies based on irreversible differentiation of cancer cells using conventional chemotherapeutic antimetabolites in combination with inhibitors of the MEK/ERK pathway or c-Myc.
| Footnotes |
|---|
J.M.S., A.G., and R.A. contributed equally to this work.
ABBREVIATIONS: NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; MTX, methotrexate; GE, gemcitabine; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; U0126, 1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis(methylthio)butadiene; siRNA, small interfering RNA; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; SP-A, surfactant protein A; SP-C, surfactant protein C; TS, thymidylate synthase.
Address correspondence to: Jordi M. Serra, Department of Hematology, Institut Universitari d'Investigacions en Ciències de la Salut (IUNICS), University Hospital Son Dureta, c/Andrea Dòria 55, E-07014 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. E-mail: jmserra{at}hsd.es
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bierau J, van Gennip AH, Rutger Meinsma RL, Caron HN, van Kuilenburg ABP (2006) Cyclopentenyl cytosine-induced activation of deoxycytidine kinase increases gemcitabine anabolism and cytotoxicity in neuroblastoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57: 105-113.[CrossRef][Medline]
Broers JL, Jensen SM, Travis WD, Pass H, Whitsett JA, Singh G, Katyal SL, Gazdar AF, Minna JD, and Linnoila RI (1992) Expression of surfactant associated protein-A and Clara cell 10 kilodalton mRNA in neoplastic and non-neoplastic human lung tissue as detected by in situ hybridization. Lab Invest 66: 337-346.[Medline]
Chang TH and Szabo E (2000) Induction of differentiation and apoptosis by ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 60: 1129-1138.
Chen JP, Chen L, Leek J, and Lin C (2006) Antisense c-myc fragments induce normal differentiation cycles in HL-60 cells. Eur J Clin Invest 36: 49-57.[Medline]
Chu E, Takechi T, Jones KL, Voeller DM, Copur SM, Maley GF, Maley F, Segal S, and Allegra CJ (1995) Thymidylate synthase binds to c-myc RNA in human colon cancer cells and in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 15: 179-185.[Abstract]
d'Amato TA, Landreneau RJ, Ricketts W, Huang W, Parker R, Mechetner E, Yu IR, Luketich JD (2007) Chemotherapy resistance and oncogene expression in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133: 352-359.
Dosaka-Akita H, Hommura F, Fujita H, Kinoshita I, Nishi M, Morikawa T, Katoh H, Kawakami Y, and Kuzumaki N (1998) Frequent loss of gelsolin expression in non-small cell lung cancers of heavy smokers. Cancer Res 58: 322-327.
Gazzeri S, Brambilla E, Jacrot M, Chauvin C, Benabid AL, and Brambilla C (1991) Activation of myc gene family in human lung carcinomas and during heterotransplantation into nude mice. Cancer Res 51: 2566-2571.
Henriksson M and Luscher B (1996) Proteins of the Myc network: essential regulators of cell growth and differentiation. Adv Cancer Res 68: 109-182.[Medline]
Hoshikawa Y, Kwon HJ, Yoshida M, Horinouchi S, and Beppu T (1994) Trichostatin A induces morphological changes and gelsolin expression by inhibiting histone deacetylase in human carcinoma cell lines. Exp Cell Res 214: 189-197.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jarrard JA, Linnoila RI, Lee H, Steinberg SM, Witschi H, and Szabo E (1998) MUC1 is a novel marker for the type II pneumocyte lineage during lung carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 58: 5582-5589.
Keshamouni VG, Reddy RC, Arenberg DA, Joel B, Thannickal VJ, Kalemkerian GP, and Standiford TJ (2004) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation inhibits tumor progression in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene 23: 100-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kimura E, Nishimura K, Sakata K, Oga S, Kashiwagi K, and Igarashi K (2004) Methotrexate differentially affects growth of suspension and adherent cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36: 814-825.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kohno M and Pouyssegur J (2006) Targeting the ERK signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Ann Med 38: 200-211.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lorenz J, Friedberg T, Paulus R, Oesch F, and Ferlinz R (1994) Oncogene overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer tissue: prevalence and clinicopathological significance. Clin Investig 72: 156-163.[Medline]
Lutterbach B and Hann SR (1994) Hierarchical phosphorylation at N-terminal transformation-sensitive sites in c-Myc protein is regulated by mitogens and in mitosis. Mol Cell Biol 14: 5510-5522.
Maghfoor I and Perry MC (2005) Lung cancer. Ann Saudi Med 25: 1-12.[Medline]
Marchal JA, Rodriguez-Serrano F, Campos J, Madeddu R, Boulaiz H, Martinez-Amat A, Carrillo E, Caba O, Prados JC, Velez C, et al. (2006) Differentiation: an encouraging approach to anticancer therapy. Ital J Anat Embryol 111: 45-64.[Medline]
Martínez J, Gutierrez A, Casas J, Llado V, Lopez-Bellan A, Besalduch J, Dopazo A, and Escriba PV (2005a) The repression of E2F-1 is critical for the activity of Minerval against cancer. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 315: 466-474.
Martínez J, Vogler O, Casas J, Barcelo F, Alemany R, Prades J, Nagy T, Baamonde C, Kasprzyk PG, Teres S, et al. (2005b) Membrane structure modulation, protein kinase C alpha activation, and anticancer activity of minerval. Mol Pharmacol 67: 531-540.
McGuire JJ (2003) Anticancer antifolates: current status and future directions. Curr Pharm Des 9: 2593-2613.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moran CA (2006) Pulmonary adenocarcinoma: the expanding spectrum of histologic variants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130: 958-962.[Medline]
Nishimoto S and Nishida E (2006) MAPK signalling: ERK5 versus ERK1/2. EMBO Rep 7: 782-786.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seger R and Krebs EG (1995) The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J 9: 726-735.[Abstract]
Shachaf CM, Kopelman AM, Arvanitis C, Karlsson A, Beer S, Mandl S, Bachmann MH, Borowsky AD, Ruebner B, Cardiff RD, et al. (2004) MYC inactivation uncovers pluripotent differentiation and tumour dormancy in hepatocellular cancer. Nature 431: 1112-1117.[CrossRef][Medline]
Singh R, Fouladi-Nashta AA, Li D, Halliday N, Barrett DA, and Sinclair KD (2006) Methotrexate induced differentiation in colon cancer cells is primarily due to purine deprivation. J Cell Biochem 99: 146-155.[CrossRef][Medline]
Spira AI and Carducci MA (2003) Differentiation therapy. Curr Opin Pharmacol 3: 338-343.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vita M and Henriksson M (2006) The Myc oncoprotein as a therapeutic target for human cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 16: 318-330.[CrossRef][Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||