![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Cell Biology, Institut Cochin, Paris, France (M.A.A., A.L., R.J.); and Institut de Recherche Servier, Suresnes, France (P.D.)
Heterodimerization has been documented for several members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, including the closely related MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptors. However, the relative abundance of hetero-versus homodimers and the specific properties, which can be attributed to each form, are difficult to determine. Using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) donor saturation assay, we show that half-maximal MT1/MT2 heterodimer formation is reached for expression levels as low as 
4000 receptors per cell. The relative propensity of MT1 homodimer and MT1/MT2 heterodimer formation are similar, whereas that for the MT2 homodimer formation is 3- to 4-fold lower. These data indicate that both the relative expression level of each receptor isoform and the affinities between monomers may determine the actual proportion of homo- and heterodimers. The specific interaction of ligands with the MT1/MT2 heterodimer was studied using a BRET-based assay as a readout for the conformational changes of the heterodimer. An MT1/MT2 heterodimer-specific profile and ligands selective for the MT1/MT2 heterodimer compared with the MT2 homodimer could be identified. Classic radioligand binding and BRET studies suggest that heterodimers contain two functional ligand binding sites that maintain their respective selectivity for MT1 and MT2 ligands. Occupation of either binding site is sufficient to induce a conformational change within the heterodimer. Taken together, these results show that the probability of GPCR heterodimer formation may be equal to or even higher than that of the corresponding homodimers and that specific properties of heterodimers can be revealed using a BRET-based ligand/receptor interaction assay.
Address correspondence to: Dr. R. Jockers, Institut Cochin, 22 rue Méchain, 75014 Paris, France. E-mail: jockers{at}cochin.inserm.fr
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Hermand, F. Pincet, S. Carvalho, H. Ansanay, E. Trinquet, M. Daoudi, C. Combadiere, and P. Deterre Functional Adhesiveness of the CX3CL1 Chemokine Requires Its Aggregation: ROLE OF THE TRANSMEMBRANE DOMAIN J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2008; 283(44): 30225 - 30234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. E. Benarroch Suprachiasmatic nucleus and melatonin: Reciprocal interactions and clinical correlations Neurology, August 19, 2008; 71(8): 594 - 598. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Lagane, K. Y. C. Chow, K. Balabanian, A. Levoye, J. Harriague, T. Planchenault, F. Baleux, N. Gunera-Saad, F. Arenzana-Seisdedos, and F. Bachelerie CXCR4 dimerization and {beta}-arrestin-mediated signaling account for the enhanced chemotaxis to CXCL12 in WHIM syndrome Blood, July 1, 2008; 112(1): 34 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. C. Y. Choi, J. Simon, K. W. K. Tsim, and E. A. Barnard Constitutive and Agonist-induced Dimerizations of the P2Y1 Receptor: RELATIONSHIP TO INTERNALIZATION AND SCAFFOLDING J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 11050 - 11063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Szidonya, M. Cserzo, and L. Hunyady Dimerization and oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors: debated structures with established and emerging functions J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 196(3): 435 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Couturier, C. Sarkis, K. Seron, S. Belouzard, P. Chen, A. Lenain, L. Corset, J. Dam, V. Vauthier, A. Dubart, et al. Silencing of OB-RGRP in mouse hypothalamic arcuate nucleus increases leptin receptor signaling and prevents diet-induced obesity PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19476 - 19481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Daulat, P. Maurice, C. Froment, J.-L. Guillaume, C. Broussard, B. Monsarrat, P. Delagrange, and R. Jockers Purification and Identification of G Protein-coupled Receptor Protein Complexes under Native Conditions Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2007; 6(5): 835 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Ayoub, D. Maurel, V. Binet, M. Fink, L. Prezeau, H. Ansanay, and J.-P. Pin Real-Time Analysis of Agonist-Induced Activation of Protease-Activated Receptor 1/G{alpha}i1 Protein Complex Measured by Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer in Living Cells Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 1329 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-P. Pin, R. Neubig, M. Bouvier, L. Devi, M. Filizola, J. A. Javitch, M. J. Lohse, G. Milligan, K. Palczewski, M. Parmentier, et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXVII. Recommendations for the Recognition and Nomenclature of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Heteromultimers Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2007; 59(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Goin and N. M. Nathanson Quantitative Analysis of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Homo- and Heterodimerization in Live Cells: REGULATION OF RECEPTOR DOWN-REGULATION BY HETERODIMERIZATION J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5416 - 5425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. S. Rada and A. F. Wiechmann Melatonin Receptors in Chick Ocular Tissues: Implications for a Role of Melatonin in Ocular Growth Regulation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 25 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Guo, L. Shi, M. Filizola, H. Weinstein, and J. A. Javitch From The Cover: Crosstalk in G protein-coupled receptors: Changes at the transmembrane homodimer interface determine activation PNAS, November 29, 2005; 102(48): 17495 - 17500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Prinster, C. Hague, and R. A. Hall Heterodimerization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Specificity and Functional Significance Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2005; 57(3): 289 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
