MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on January 3, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.004713


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.004713v1
mol.104.004713v2
67/4/1067    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suhre, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suhre, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, S. H.


Received for publication July 12, 2004.
Revised December 30, 2004.
Accepted for publication January 3, 2005.

Molecular Determinants of Substrate/Inhibitor Binding to the Human and Rabbit Renal Organic Cation Transporters, hOCT2 and rbOCT2

Wendy M. Suhre 1, Sean Ekins 2, Cheng Chang 3, Peter W. Swaan 3, Stephen H. Wright 1*

1 University of Arizona 2 Concurrent Pharmaceuticals 3 University of Maryland

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: shwright{at}u.arizona.edu

Abstract

Organic cation transporters are important for the elimination of many drugs and toxins from the body. In the present study, substrate-transporter interactions were investigated in CHO cells stably transfected with either the human or rabbit orthologs of the principal organic cation transporter in the kidney, OCT2. IC50 values, ranging from 0.04 µM to > 3 mM, for inhibition of [14C]TEA transport were determined for more than 30 structurally diverse compounds. Although the two OCT orthologs displayed similar IC50 values for some of these compounds, the majority varied by as much as 20-fold. Marked differences in substrate affinity were also noted when comparing hOCT2 to the closely related homolog, hOCT1. These data suggest the molecular determinants of substrate binding differ markedly among both homologous and orthologous OCT transporters. The software package Cerius2 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA) was used to generate a descriptor-based 2D-quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) to produce a model relating the affinity of hOCT2 to particular physicochemical features of substrate/inhibitor molecules (r2 = 0.81). Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA; Tripos, St Louis, MO) was used to generate 3D-QSARs describing the structural basis of substrate binding to hOCT2 and rbOCT2 (q2 = 0.60 and 0.53, respectively, and each with r2 = 0.97). The quality of the models was assessed by their ability to successfully predict the inhibition of a set of test compounds. The current models enabled prediction of OCT2 affinity and may prove useful in the prediction of unwanted drug interactions at the level of the renal secretory process.


Key words: Biogenic Amine, Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Liver transporters, Structure/function/mechanism





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics