MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on November 19, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.008102


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.008102v1
67/3/837    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Endres, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Unadkat, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Endres, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Unadkat, J. D.


Received for publication October 12, 2004.
Revised November 19, 2004.
Accepted for publication November 19, 2004.

Residues Met89 and Ser160 in the Human Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter 1 (hENT1) Affect hENT1's Affinity for Adenosine, Guanosine, NBMPR and Dipyridamole

Christopher J. Endres 1 Jashvant D. Unadkat 1*

1 University of Washington, Department of Pharmaceutics

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: jash{at}u.washington.edu

Abstract

The human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) is an important modulator of the physiological action of adenosine. We identified amino acid residues involved in adenosine transport using a yeast-based assay to rapidly screen and identify randomly generated hENT1 mutants that exhibited decreased sensitivity to inhibition of adenosine transport by various hENT1 competitive inhibitors. We identified Met89 and Ser160 as important in hENT1's affinity for various substrates and inhibitors. Mutation to Met89Cys or Ser160Cys significantly (p<0.05) increased the NBMPR IC50 by approximately 4 and 6-fold respectively (42 ± 13 and 65 ± 1.6 nM) when compared with the wild-type transporter (11 ± 0.7 nM). The double mutant, Met89Cys/Ser160Cys, synergistically increased NBMPR IC50 to approximately 19-fold of the wild-type transporter. In contrast, when compared to wild-type hENT1, the sensitivity to dipyridamole inhibition was significantly (p<0.05) increased by only the Ser160Cys (~2.6-fold) or the double Met89Cys/Ser160Cys mutant (~4.7-fold) but not by the Met89Cys mutant. Mutation to Met89Cys or Ser160Cys increased the Km of adenosine (~8 and 3-fold) and the Ki of guanosine (~6 and 2-fold). The double mutant increased both the Km of adenosine and Ki of guanosine by ~8-fold and appeared to confer no additional reduction in adenosine or guanosine affinity than that by mutation of Met89 alone. Collectively, these data indicate that TMD2 (Met89) and TMD4 (Ser160) of hENT1 interact and are important in conferring sensitivity to NBMPR. In contrast, Ser160 and Met89 of hENT1 respectively play a dominant role in conferring sensitivity to dipyridamole and adenosine/guanosine affinity.


Key words: Adenosine, Nucleoside/Nucleotide, Ischemia/Reperfusion





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics