MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on April 6, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.022491


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.106.022491v1
70/1/259    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Alan R. Jacobson
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fessenden, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fessenden, J. D.


Received for publication January 12, 2006.
Revised April 4, 2006.
Accepted for publication April 6, 2006.

Structural determinants of 4-chloro-m-cresol required for activation of ryanodine receptor type 1

Alan R. Jacobson 1, Scott T. Moe 1, Paul D. Allen 2, James D. Fessenden 3*

1 Absolute Science Inc. 2 Brigham and Women's Hospital 3 Boston Biomedical Research Institute

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: fessenden{at}bbri.org

Abstract

4-Chloro-m-cresol (4-CmC) is a clinically relevant activator of the intracellular Ca2+ release channel, the ryanodine receptor isoform 1 (RyR1). In this study, the chemical moieties on the 4-CmC molecule required for its activation of RyR1 were determined using structure-activity relationship analysis with a set of commercially available 4-CmC analogs. Separate compounds each lacking one of the three functional groups of 4-CmC (1-hydroxyl, 3-methyl, 4-chloro) were poor activators of RyR1. Substitution of different chemical groups for the 1-hydroxyl of 4-CmC resulted in compounds that were poor activators of RyR1, thus suggesting that the hydroxyl group is preferred at this position. Substitution of hydrophobic groups at the 3-position enhanced bioactivity of the compound relative to 4-CmC, whereas substitution with hydrophilic groups abolished bioactivity. Similarly, 4-CmC analogs with hydrophobic groups substituted into the 4-position enhanced bioactivity while hydrophilic or charged groups diminished bioactivity. 4-CmC analogs containing a single hydrophobic group at either the 3- or 4- position as well as 3,5-disubstituted or 3,4,5-trisubstituted phenols were also effective activators of RyR1. These results indicate that the 1-hydroxyl group of 4-CmC is required for activation of RyR1 and that hydrophobic groups at the 3,4 and 5-positions are preferred. These findings suggest that the 4-CmC binding site on RyR1 most likely consists of a hydrophilic region to interact with the 1-hydroxyl as well as a hydrophobic region(s) to interact with chemical groups at the 3- and/or 4- positions of 4-CmC


Key words: Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Ca imaging, Receptor binding studies





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics