|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication March 20, 2006.
Revised May 28, 2006.
Accepted for publication May 30, 2006.
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]-substance P functions as a low potency antagonist but a high potency inverse agonist on the ghrelin receptor. Through a systematic deletion and substitution analysis of this peptide the C-terminal, carboxyamidated pentapeptide wFwLX was identified as the core structure, which however in it self displayed relatively low inverse agonist potency. Mutational analysis at 17 selected positions in the main ligand-binding crevice of the ghrelin receptor demonstrated that ghrelin apparently interacts only with residues in the middle part of the pocket i.e. between TM-III, -VI and -VII. In contrast the inverse agonist peptides bind in a pocket, which extends all the way from the extracellular end of TM-II (AspII:20) across between TM-III and TM-VI / -VII over to TM-V and TM-IV. The potency of the main inverse agonist could be improved up to 20-fold by a number of space-generating mutants located relatively deep in the binding pocket at key positions in TM-III, -IV and -V. It is proposed that the inverse agonists prevent the spontaneous receptor activation by inserting relatively deep across the main ligand-binding pocket and sterically blocking the movement of TM-VI and -VII into their inward-bend, active conformation. The combined structure-functional analysis of both the ligand and the receptor allowed for the design of a novel, N-terminally Lys-extended analog of wFwLL, which rescued the high potency, selective inverse agonism being dependent upon both AspII:20 and GluIII:09. The identified pharmacophore can possibly serve as the basis for targeted discovery of also non-peptide inverse agonists for the ghrelin receptor.
Key words:
Neuropeptides, Gq/11 family, IP3/DAG, Func. analysis receptor/ion channel mutants, Receptor binding studies
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. T. Pfluger, H. Kirchner, S. Gunnel, B. Schrott, D. Perez-Tilve, S. Fu, S. C. Benoit, T. Horvath, H.-G. Joost, K. E. Wortley, et al. Simultaneous deletion of ghrelin and its receptor increases motor activity and energy expenditure Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): G610 - G618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Holliday, B. Holst, E. A. Rodionova, T. W. Schwartz, and H. M. Cox Importance of Constitutive Activity and Arrestin-Independent Mechanisms for Intracellular Trafficking of the Ghrelin Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 3100 - 3112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liu, J.-P. Fortin, M. Beinborn, and A. S. Kopin Four Missense Mutations in the Ghrelin Receptor Result in Distinct Pharmacological Abnormalities J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2007; 322(3): 1036 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Jensen, R. Nygaard, S. Thiele, A. Elder, G. Zhu, R. Kolbeck, S. Ghosh, T. W. Schwartz, and M. M. Rosenkilde Molecular Interaction of a Potent Nonpeptide Agonist with the Chemokine Receptor CCR8 Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 72(2): 327 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Holst, J. Mokrosinski, M. Lang, E. Brandt, R. Nygaard, T. M. Frimurer, A. G. Beck-Sickinger, and T. W. Schwartz Identification of an Efficacy Switch Region in the Ghrelin Receptor Responsible for Interchange between Agonism and Inverse Agonism J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15799 - 15811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||