MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on July 19, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.024661


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.106.024661v1
mol.106.024661v2
70/4/1236    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Degroot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nomikos, G. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Degroot, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nomikos, G. G


Received for publication April 17, 2006.
Revised July 19, 2006.
Accepted for publication July 19, 2006.

CB1 Receptor Antagonism Increases Hippocampal Acetylcholine Release: Site and Mechanism of Action

Aldemar Degroot 1, Attila Kofalvi 2, Mark R Wade 1, Richard J Davis 1, Ricardo J Rodrigues 2, Nelson Rebola 2, Rodrigo A Cunha 2, George G Nomikos 3*

1 Eli Lilly 2 Center for Neuroscience, University of Coimbra 3 Amgen

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: gnomikos{at}amgen.com

Abstract

Evidence indicates that blockade of cannabinoid receptors increases acetylcholine (ACh) release in brain cortical regions. Although it is assumed that this type of effect is mediated through CB1 receptor (CB1R) antagonism, recently several in vitro functional studies have suggested non-CB1R involvement. In addition, neither the precise neuroanatomical site nor the exact mechanisms underlying this effect are known. We thoroughly examined these issues using a combination of systemic and local administration of CB1R antagonists, different methods of in vivo microdialysis, CB1R knockout (KO) mice, tissue measurements of ACh, and immunochemistry. First, we showed that systemic injections of the CB1R antagonists SR141716A and AM251 dose-dependently increased hippocampal ACh efflux. Similarly, local hippocampal, but not septal, infusions of SR141716A or AM251 increased hippocampal ACh release. Importantly, the stimulatory effects of systemically administered CB1R antagonists on hippocampal ACh release were completely abolished in CB1R KO mice. CB1R KO mice had similar basal, but higher stress-enhanced, hippocampal ACh levels compared to wild-type controls. Interestingly, dopamine D1 receptor antagonism counteracted the stimulatory effect of CB1R blockade on hippocampal ACh levels. Finally, immunohistochemical methods revealed that a high proportion of CB1R positive nerve terminals were found in hippocampus and confirmed the co-localization of CB1 receptors with cholinergic and dopaminergic nerve terminals. In conclusion, hippocampal ACh release may specifically be controlled through CB1Rs located on both cholinergic and dopaminergic neuronal projections, and CB1R antagonism increases hippocampal ACh release probably through both a direct disinhibition of ACh release and an indirect increase in dopaminergic neurotransmission at the D1 receptors.


Key words: Cannabinoid, Immunocytochemistry, Knockout





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics