|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication August 24, 2006.
Revised October 26, 2006.
Accepted for publication December 20, 2006.
Despite extensive study of heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the precise mechanism of G protein activation is unknown. The role of one highly conserved stretch of residues, the amino acids Glu/Asp-Arg-Tyr, (i.e. the E/DRY motif) has received considerable attention with respect to regulating GPCR conformational states. In the consensus view, Glu/Asp maintains the receptor in its ground state, since mutations frequently induce constitutive activity (CA). This hypothesis has been confirmed by the rhodopsin ground-state crystal structure and by computational modeling approaches. However, some class A GPCRs are resistant to CA, suggesting alternative roles for the Glu/Asp residue and the E/DRY motif. Here we propose two different subgroups of receptors within class A GPCRs that make different use of the E/DRY motif, independent of the G protein type (Gs, Gi or Gq) to which the receptor couples. In P1-type receptors, non-conservative mutations of the Glu/Asp-Arg residues, besides inducing CA, increase affinity for agonist binding, retain G protein coupling, and retain an agonist-induced response. In contrast, in P2-type receptors, the E/DRY motif is more directly involved in governing receptor conformation and G protein coupling/recognition. Hence, mutations of the Glu/Asp residues do not induce CA. Conversely, non-conservative mutations of the Arg of the E/DRY motif always impair agonist-induced receptor responses and, generally, reduce agonist binding affinity. Thus, it is essential to look beyond the rhodopsin ground state model of conformational activation to clarify the role of this highly conserved triplet in GPCR activation and function.
Key words:
G protein regulation, Desensitization/uncoupling, Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Prediction of structure-function/proteomics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Wacker, D. B. Feller, X.-B. Tang, M. C. DeFino, Y. Namkung, J. S. Lyssand, A. J. Mhyre, X. Tan, J. B. Jensen, and C. Hague Disease-causing Mutation in GPR54 Reveals the Importance of the Second Intracellular Loop for Class A G-protein-coupled Receptor Function J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2008; 283(45): 31068 - 31078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Sarkar, I. Dodevski, M. Kenig, S. Dudli, A. Mohr, E. Hermans, and A. Pluckthun From the Cover: Directed evolution of a G protein-coupled receptor for expression, stability, and binding selectivity PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14808 - 14813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Proulx, B. J. Holleran, A. A. Boucard, E. Escher, G. Guillemette, and R. Leduc Mutational Analysis of the Conserved Asp2.50 and ERY Motif Reveals Signaling Bias of the Urotensin II Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 552 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Artigas, A. Gonzalez, E. Riquelme, C. A. Carvajal, A. Cattani, A. Martinez-Aguayo, A. M. Kalergis, T. Perez-Acle, and C. E. Fardella A Novel Adrenocorticotropin Receptor Mutation Alters Its Structure and Function, Causing Familial Glucocorticoid Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 3097 - 3105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pang, J. Dong, and P. Thomas Estrogen Signaling Characteristics of Atlantic Croaker G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 (GPR30) and Evidence It Is Involved in Maintenance of Oocyte Meiotic Arrest Endocrinology, July 1, 2008; 149(7): 3410 - 3426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hase, T. Yokomizo, T. Shimizu, and M. Nakamura Characterization of an Orphan G Protein-coupled Receptor, GPR20, That Constitutively Activates Gi Proteins J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2008; 283(19): 12747 - 12755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tokunaga, B. Matsuura, M. Dong, L. J. Miller, T. Ueda, S. Furukawa, Y. Hiasa, and M. Onji Mutational analysis of predicted intracellular loop domains of human motilin receptor Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): G460 - G466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Johnston and D. P. Siderovski Receptor-Mediated Activation of Heterotrimeric G-Proteins: Current Structural Insights Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 72(2): 219 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Tao, S. Nandadasa, P. D. McCrea, J. Heasman, and C. Wylie G-protein-coupled signals control cortical actin assembly by controlling cadherin expression in the early Xenopus embryo Development, July 15, 2007; 134(14): 2651 - 2661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||