MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on January 5, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.032953


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.106.032953v1
71/4/1006    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leontiou, C.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leontiou, C.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, C. A.


Received for publication November 28, 2006.
Revised January 4, 2007.
Accepted for publication January 5, 2007.

Differential selection of acridine resistance mutations in human DNA topoisomerase II{beta} is dependent on the acridine structure

Chrysoula Leontiou 1, Gary Peter Watters 1, kathryn Linda Gilroy 1, Pauline Heslop 1, Ian George Cowell 1, Kate Craig 1, Robert N Lightowlers 1, Jeremy H Lakey 1, Caroline Ann Austin 1*

1 Newcastle University

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: caroline.austin{at}ncl.ac.uk

Abstract

Type II DNA topoisomerases are targets of acridine drugs. Nine mutations conferring resistance to acridines were obtained by forced molecular evolution, using mAMSA, mAMCA, AMCA and DACA as selection agents. Mutations {beta}H514Y, {beta}E522K, {beta}G550R, {beta}A596T, {beta}Y606C, {beta}R651C and {beta}D661N were in the B' domain, {beta}G465D and {beta}P732L were not. With AMCA four mutations were selected ({beta}E522K, {beta}G550R, {beta}A596T and {beta}D661N). Two mutations were selected with mAMCA ({beta}Y606C and {beta}R651C) and two with mAMSA ({beta}G465D and {beta}P732L). Interestingly there was no overlap between mutation selection with AMCA and mAMSA or mAMCA. AMCA lacks the methoxy substituent present in mAMCA and mAMSA, suggesting this motif determines the mutations selected. With the fourth acridine DACA, five mutations were selected for resistance ({beta}G465D, {beta}H514Y, {beta}G550R, {beta}A596T and {beta}D661N). {beta}G465D was selected with both DACA and mAMSA, and {beta}G550R, {beta}A596T and {beta}D661N were selected with both DACA and AMCA. DACA lacks the anilino motif of the other three drugs but retains the acridine ring motif. The overlap in selection with DACA and mAMSA or AMCA suggests that altered recognition of the acridine moiety may be involved in these mutations. We used Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms and heteroduplex analysis to demonstrate some mutations were selected multiple times ({beta}G465D, {beta}E522K, {beta}G550R, {beta}A596T and {beta}D661N), whilst others were selected only once ({beta}H514Y, {beta}Y606C, {beta}R651C and {beta}P732L). Here we compare the drug resistance profile of all nine mutations and report the biochemical characterisation of three, {beta}G550R, {beta}Y606C and {beta}D661N.


Key words: Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Mutagenesis/Chimeric approaches, Topoisomerases





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics