|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication November 29, 2006.
Revised February 23, 2007.
Accepted for publication February 23, 2007.
-sheet of
7 nicotinic receptors
Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channels assemble as pentameric proteins with each monomer contributing two structural elements: an extracellular ligand-binding domain (LBD) and a transmembrane ion channel domain (TMD). Models of receptor activation include rotational movements of subunits leading to opening of the ion channel. We tested this idea using substituted cysteine accessibility to track conformational changes in the inner
sheet of the LBD. Using a non-desensitizing chick
7 background (L247T), we constructed 18 consecutive cysteine replacement mutants (L36 to I53) and tested each for expression of ACh-evoked currents and functional sensitivity to thiol modification. We measured rates of modification in the presence and absence of ACh to identify conformational changes associated with receptor activation. Resting modification rates of eight substituted cysteines in the
1 and
2 strands and the sequence between them (loop 2) varied over several orders of magnitude, suggesting substantial differences in the accessibility or electrostatic environment of individual side chains. These differences were in general agreement with structural models of the LBD. Eight of eighteen cysteine replacements displayed ACh-dependent changes in modification rates, indicating a change in the accessibility or electrostatic environment of the introduced cysteine during activation. Surprisingly, we found the effects of agonist exposure were difficult to reconcile with rotational models of activation. Acetylcholine reduced the modification rate of M40C but increased it at N52C despite the close physical proximity of these residues. Our results suggest that models that depend strictly on rigid-body rotation of the LBD may provide an incomplete description of receptor activation.
Key words:
Nicotinic cholinergic, Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Mutagenesis/Chimeric approaches
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. K. Crawford, D. I. Perkins, J. R. Trudell, E. J. Bertaccini, D. L. Davies, and R. L. Alkana Roles for Loop 2 Residues of {alpha}1 Glycine Receptors in Agonist Activation J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2008; 283(41): 27698 - 27706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yi, H. Tjong, and H.-X. Zhou Spontaneous conformational change and toxin binding in {alpha}7 acetylcholine receptor: Insight into channel activation and inhibition PNAS, June 17, 2008; 105(24): 8280 - 8285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Purohit and A. Auerbach Acetylcholine Receptor Gating: Movement in the {alpha}-Subunit Extracellular Domain J. Gen. Physiol., November 26, 2007; 130(6): 569 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||