MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on April 22, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.041988


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.107.041988v1
74/1/82    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamauchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, T.


Received for publication October 15, 2007.
Revised April 22, 2008.
Accepted for publication April 22, 2008.

Carmustine-resistant cancer cells are sensitized to temozolomide due to enhanced mismatch repair during the development of carmustine resistance

Takahiro Yamauchi 1*, Masami Ogawa 2, Takanori Ueda 1

1 University of Fukui 2 Schering-Plough K.K.

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: tyamauch{at}fmsrsa.fukui-med.ac.jp

Abstract

The cytotoxicity of the monofunctional alkylator temozolomide (TMZ) is mediated by mismatch repair (MMR) triggered by O6-alkylguanine, while MMR protects cells against bifunctional alkylators including carmustine (BCNU). Therefore, TMZ may be cytotoxic to BCNU-resistant cancer cells because MMR affects sensitivity to TMZ and BCNU in a converse way. We evaluated TMZ cytotoxicity on BCNU-resistant variant (CEM-R) compared with the parental CCRF-CEM cell line (CEM-S). The mechanisms of its BCNU-resistance involved DNA repairs including nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, alkylguanine alkyltransferase, and MMR, and apoptotic and survival pathways. Especially, transcript levels of MMR-related hMLH1 and hMSH2 were enhanced in CEM-R cells. CEM-R cells were 8-fold more BCNU-resistant but surprisingly 9-fold more TMZ-sensitive than were CEM-S cells. Although TMZ-induced adducts include N-alkylated purines and O6-alkylguaine, DNA excision repair was enhanced in CEM-R cells, suggesting the efficient repair of N-alkylation adducts. Co-treatment with methoxyamine, a base excision repair inhibitor, did not sensitize CEM-R cells to TMZ, suggesting no or little contribution of N-alkylation to TMZ-induced cytotoxicity. Co-treatment with O6-benzylguanine, an alkylguanine alkyltransferase inhibitor, further sensitized CEM-R cells to TMZ, confirming the cytotoxic impact of O6-alkylguanine. Co-treatment with cadmium chloride, an MMR inhibitor, disrupted the sensitivity of CEM-R cells to TMZ. The sensitivity to TMZ was reversed in the CEM-R variant clone that had been established by transfecting CEM-R cells with shRNA against hMLH1, suggesting the critical role of MMR on sensitization to TMZ. In conclusion, BCNU-resistant CEM-R cells were sensitized to TMZ due to enhanced MMR during the development of BCNU resistance.


Key words: Mechanisms of cell killing/apoptosis, Resistance





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics