MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on February 28, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.042754


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.107.042754v1
73/6/1736    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malherbe, P.
Right arrow Articles by Spooren, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malherbe, P.
Right arrow Articles by Spooren, W.


Received for publication October 17, 2007.
Revised February 6, 2008.
Accepted for publication February 25, 2008.

Me-talnetant and osanetant interact within overlapping but not identical binding pockets in the human tachykinin NK3 receptor transmembrane domains

Pari Malherbe 1*, Caterina Bissantz 1, Anne Marcuz 1, Claudia Kratzeisen 1, Marie-Therese Zenner 1, Joseph G. Wettstein 1, Hasane Ratni 1, Claus Riemer 1, Will Spooren 1

1 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: parichehr.malherbe{at}roche.com

Abstract

Recent clinical trials have indicated that neurokinin 3 receptor antagonists osanetant and talnetant may treat symptoms of schizophrenia. Using site-directed mutagenesis, rhodopsin-based modeling, [3H]Me-talnetant and [3H]osanetant binding and functional Schild analyses, we have demonstrated the important molecular determinants of NKB, Me-talnetant and osanetant binding pockets. The residues N1382.57, N1422.61, L23245.49, Y3156.51, F3427.39 and M3467.43 were found to be crucial for the NKB-binding site. We observed that the M1342.53A, V1693.36M, F3427.39M and S3417.38I/F3427.39M mutations resulted in the complete loss of [3H]Me-talnetant and [3H]osanetant binding affinities and also abolished their functional potencies in an NKB-evoked accumulation of [3H]IP assay, while the mutations V951.42A, N1422.61A, Y3156.51F and M3467.43A behaved differently between two antagonists’ interacting modes. V951.42A and M3467.43A significantly decreased Me-talnetant's affinity and potency. Y3156.51F, while not affecting Me-talnetant, led to a significant decrease in affinity and potency of osanetant. The mutation N1422.61A, which abolished osanetant's potency and affinity, led to a significant increase in Me-talnetant's affinity and potency. The proposed docking mode was further validated using RO4908594, from another chemical class. Interestingly, the mutation F3427.39A caused a 80-fold gain of RO4908594 binding affinity, but the same mutation resulted in the complete loss of Me-talnetant's and partial loss of osanetant's affinity. These observations show that the binding pocket of Me-talnetant and osanetant are overlapping, but not identical. Taken together, our data are consistent with the proposed docking modes where Me-talnetant reaches deeply into the pocket formed by TM1, -2 and -7, whereas osanetant fills the pocket TM3, -5 and -6 with its phenyl-piperidine moiety.


Key words: Neuropeptides, Tachykinin, Gq/11 family, Structure determinations, Mutagenesis/Chimeric approaches, Receptor binding studies, Anti-psychotics





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics