MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on January 31, 2008; DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.042978


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.107.042978v1
73/5/1371    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoare, S. R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Grigoriadis, D. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoare, S. R.J.
Right arrow Articles by Grigoriadis, D. E


Received for publication October 29, 2007.
Revised January 27, 2008.
Accepted for publication January 28, 2008.

Allosteric ligands for the corticotropin releasing factor type 1 receptor modulate conformational states involved in receptor activation

Sam R.J. Hoare 1*, Beth A Fleck 1, Raymond S Gross 1, Paul D Crowe 1, John P Williams 1, Dimitri E Grigoriadis 1

1 Neurocrine Biosciences

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: shoare{at}neurocrine.com

Abstract

Allosteric modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors can regulate conformational states involved in receptor activation (Hall DA (2000) Modeling the functional effects of allosteric modulators at pharmacological receptors: an extension of the two-state model of receptor activation. Mol Pharmacol 58:1412-1423). This hypothesis was investigated for the corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 (CRF1) receptor, using a novel series of ligands with varying allosteric effect on CRF binding (inhibition to enhancement). For the G-protein-uncoupled receptor, allosteric modulation of CRF binding was correlated with nonpeptide ligand signaling activity; inverse agonists inhibited and agonists enhanced CRF binding. These data were quantitatively consistent with a two-state equilibrium underlying the modulation of CRF binding to the G-protein-uncoupled receptor. We next investigated the allosteric effect on CRF-stimulated G-protein coupling. Ligands inhibited CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation regardless of their effect on the G-protein-uncoupled state. The modulators reduced CRF Emax, suggesting they reduced the efficacy of a CRF-bound active state to couple to G-protein. Consistent with this hypothesis, the modulators inhibited binding to a guanine nucleotide-sensitive state. Collectively the results are quantitatively consistent with a model in which: 1) The receptor exists in three predominant states, an inactive state, a weakly-active state and a CRF-bound fully-active state. 2) Allosteric inverse agonists stabilize the inactive state and allosteric agonists stabilize the weakly-active state. 3) Antagonism of CRF signaling results from destabilization of the fully-active state. These findings imply nonpeptide ligands differentially modulate conformational states involved in CRF1 receptor activation and suggest different conformational states can be targeted in designing nonpeptide ligands to inhibit CRF signaling.


Key words: Neuropeptides, CRF, Receptor binding studies, Peptide hormones





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics