![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication October 31, 2007.
Revised January 16, 2008.
Accepted for publication January 17, 2008.
Previously we showed that perturbations of protein transmembrane helices are manifested as one of three types of non-canonical structures (wide turns, tight turns and kinks), which, as compared to
-helices, are evident by distinctive C
i
C
x distances. Here we report the analysis of over 3,000 transmembrane helices in 244 crystal structures from which we identified 70 wide turns (29 proline- and 41 non-proline-induced). Based on differences in the C
i
C
i-4 and C
i
C
i-5 profiles, we show that wide turns can be subclassified into three distinct subclasses (W1, W2 and W3) that differ with regards to the number and position of backbone i
i-5 H-bonds formed N-terminal to the perturbing or signature proline or non-proline residue. Although wide turns generally produce changes in helical direction of 20°-30° and a lateral shift in the helical axis, some of the W3 subclass are associated with changes of < 5°. We also show that the distinct architectural features of wide turns allow the carbonyl bond of the i-4th residue, which is located on the widened loop of a wide turn, to be directed away from the helical axis. This provides regions of flexibility within helical regions allowing, for example, unique opportunities for interhelical H-bonding, including interactions with glycine zipper motifs, and for ion and cofactor binding. Further, differences in wide turn subtype usage by related protein family members, such as the G-protein coupled receptors, rhodopsin and the
2-adrenergic receptor, can significantly impact the orientation and position of residues critical for ligand binding and receptor activation.
Key words:
Structure determinations, Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Prediction of structure-function/proteomics