|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication December 31, 2007.
Revised March 20, 2008.
Accepted for publication April 2, 2008.
We have previously used RNA interference to demonstrate that GRK2 regulates endogenously expressed H1 histamine receptor in HEK-293 cells. In this report, we investigate the regulation of endogenously expressed M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M3 mAchR). We show that knockdown of GRK2, GRK3 or GRK6, but not GRK5, significantly increased carbachol-mediated calcium mobilization. Stable-expression of wild-type GRK2 or a kinase-dead mutant (GRK2-K220R) reduced calcium mobilization following receptor activation, while GRK2 mutants defective in G
q binding (GRK2-D110A, GRK2-R106A and GRK2-R106A/K220R) had no effect on calcium signaling, suggesting that GRK2 primarily regulates Gq following M3 mAchR activation. The knockdown of arrestin-2 or arrestin-3 also significantly increased carbachol-mediated calcium mobilization. Knockdown of GRK2 as well as the arrestins also significantly enhanced carbachol-mediated activation of ERK1/2 while prolonged ERK1/2 activation was only observed with GRK2 or arrestin-3 knockdown. We also investigated the role of casein kinase-1
(CK1
) and found that knockdown of CK1
increased calcium mobilization but not ERK activation. In summary, our data suggest that multiple proteins dynamically regulate M3 mAchR-mediated calcium signaling while GRK2 and arrestin-3 play the primary role in regulating ERK activation.
Key words:
Muscarinic cholinergic, Gq/11 family, Desensitization/uncoupling, GRKs, barrestins
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. V. Gurevich and E. V. Gurevich Rich Tapestry of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling and Regulatory Mechanisms Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2008; 74(2): 312 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||