|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication January 3, 2008.
Revised April 17, 2008.
Accepted for publication April 18, 2008.
The mechanisms by which the GABA and benzodiazepine (BZD) binding sites of the GABA-A receptor are allosterically coupled remain elusive. Here, we separately monitored ligand-induced structural changes in the BZD binding site (
/
interface) and at aligned positions in the
/
interface.
1H101 and surrounding residues were individually mutated to cysteine and expressed with wild-type
2 and
2 subunits in Xenopus oocytes. The accessibilities of introduced cysteines to modification by MTSEA-Biotin were measured in the presence and absence of GABA-site agonists, antagonists, BZDs and pentobarbital. The presence of flurazepam or the BZD-site antagonist, Ro15-1788, decreased the rate of modification of
1H101C at the BZD binding site. GABA and muscimol each increased MTSEA-biotin modification of
1H101C located at the BZD-site, SR-95531 (a GABA binding site antagonist) decreased the rate, whereas pentobarbital had no effect. Modification of
1H101 at the
/
interface was significantly slower than modification of
1H101 at the BZD-site and the presence of GABA or flurazepam had no effect on its accessibility indicating the physico-chemical environments of the
/
and
/
interfaces are different. The data are consistent with the idea that GABA-binding site occupation by agonists causes a GABA binding cavity closure that is directly coupled to BZD binding cavity opening and GABA-site antagonist binding causes a movement linked to BZD binding cavity closure. Pentobarbital binding/gating resulted in no observable movements in the BZD binding site near
1H101C indicating that structural mechanisms underlying allosteric coupling between the GABA and BZD binding sites are distinct.
Key words:
GABAA, GABAC, Ion channel regulation, Structure-activity relationships and modeling, Func. analysis receptor/ion channel mutants, Barbiturates, Benzodiazepines