μ-Opioid Receptor-Stimulated Guanosine-5′-O-(γ-thio)-triphosphate Binding in Rat Thalamus and Cultured Cell Lines: Signal Transduction Mechanisms Underlying Agonist Efficacy

  1. Dana E. Selley,
  2. Laura J. Sim,
  3. Ruoyo Xiao,
  4. Qixu Liu and
  5. Steven R. Childers
  1. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157

    Abstract

    G protein activation by different μ-selective opioid agonists was examined in rat thalamus, SK-N-SH cells, and μ-opioid receptor-transfected mMOR-CHO cells using agonist-stimulated guanosine-5′-O-(γ-thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTPγS) binding to membranes in the presence of excess GDP. [d-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]Enkephalin (DAMGO) was the most efficacious agonist in rat thalamus and SK-N-SH cells, followed by (in rank order) fentanyl = morphine ≫ buprenorphine. In mMOR-CHO cells expressing a high density of μ receptors, no differences were observed among DAMGO, morphine or fentanyl, but these agonists were more efficacious than buprenorphine, which was more efficacious than levallorphan. In all three systems, efficacy differences were magnified by increasing GDP concentrations, indicating that the activity state of G proteins can affect agonist efficacy. Scatchard analysis of net agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding revealed two major components responsible for agonist efficacy differences. First, differences in theKD values of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding between high efficacy agonists (DAMGO, fentanyl, and morphine) and classic partial agonists (buprenorphine and levallorphan) were observed in all three systems. Second, differences in the Bmax value of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding were observed between DAMGO and morphine or fentanyl in rat thalamus and SK-N-SH cells and between the high efficacy agonists and buprenorphine or levallorphan in all three systems. These results suggest that μ-opioid agonist efficacy is determined by the magnitude of the receptor-mediated affinity shift in the binding of GTP (or [35S]GTPγS) versus GDP to the G protein and by the number of G proteins activated per occupied receptor.

    Footnotes

    • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Steven R. Childers, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. E-mail: childers{at}bgsm.edu

    • 1 C. Breivogel, D. E. Selley, and S. R. Childers. Acute and chronic affects of opioids on delta and mureceptor activation of G proteins in NG108-15 and SK-N-SH cell membranes, submitted for publication.

    • This work was partially supported by United States Public Health Service Grant DA02904 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and a Young Investigator Award (D.E.S.) from the North Carolina Governor’s Institute on Alcohol and Substance Abuse.

    • Abbreviations:
      GTPγS
      guanosine-5′-O-(γ-thio)-triphosphate
      DAMGO
      [d-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin
      EGTA
      ethylene glycol bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid
      FBS
      fetal bovine serum
      CHO
      Chinese hamster ovary
      • Received May 28, 1996.
      • Accepted September 27, 1996.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents