Humanization of Mouse 5-Hydroxytryptamine1B Receptor Gene by Homologous Recombination: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
- P. Bonaventure1,2,1,2,
- L. Umans1,3,
- M. H. M. Bakker1,
- P. Cras4,
- X. Langlois1,
- W. H. M. L. Luyten5,
- A. A. H. P. Megens6,
- L. Serneels3,
- F. Van Leuven3 and
- J. E. Leysen1,2
- 1Department of Biochemical Pharmacology, Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium (P.B., M.H.M.B., X.L., J.E.L.); 2Research Institute Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.B., J.E.L.); 3Experimental Genetics Group, Centrum voor Menselijke Erfelijkheid, Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (L.U., L.S., F. Van L.); 4Department of Pathology, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium (P.C.); 5Department of Functional Genomics, Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium (W.H.M.L.L.); and 6Department of General In Vivo Pharmacology, Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium (A.A.H.P.M.)
Abstract
We replaced the coding region of the murine 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B receptor by the human 5-HT1B receptor using homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells and generated and characterized homozygous transgenic mice that express only the human (h) 5-HT1B receptor. The distribution patterns of h5-HT1B and murine (m) 5-HT1B receptor mRNA and binding sites in brain sections of transgenic and wild-type mice were identical as measured by in situ hybridization histochemistry and radioligand receptor autoradiography. When measured in parallel under identical conditions, the h5-HT1B receptor expressed in mouse brain had the same pharmacological characteristics as that in human brain. Stimulation by 5-HT1B agonists of [35S]guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding in brain sections demonstrated the functional coupling of the h5-HT1B receptor to G proteins in mouse brain. In tissue slices from various brain regions, electrically stimulated [3H]5-HT release was not modified by 5-HT1Bagonists in tissue from either transgenic and wild-type mice; a 5-HT1B antagonist enhanced electrically stimulated [3H]5-HT release in wild-type mouse brain, but was ineffective in the transgenics. The centrally active 5-HT1A/5-HT1B agonist RU24969 induced hypothermia but did not increase locomotor activity in the transgenic mice. The ineffectiveness of RU24969 in the transgenic mice could be due to the lower affinity of the compound for the h5-HT1Breceptor compared with the m5-HT1B receptor. The present study demonstrates a complete replacement of the mouse receptor by its human receptor homolog and a functional coupling to G proteins. However, modulation of [3H]5-HT release could not be shown. Furthermore, behavioral effects were not clearly observed, which may be due to a lack of appropriate tools.
The neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is involved in many physiological functions (Hoyer et al., 1994). In mammals, the multiple actions of 5-HT are mediated by the interaction with at least 13 molecularly distinct receptors (Saudou and Hen, 1994). Among them, the 5-HT1B receptor has gained particular interest. It belongs to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors, and its principal signal transduction pathway occurs via negative coupling to adenylyl cyclase (Adham et al., 1992; Hamblin et al., 1992; Maroteaux et al., 1992; Weinshank et al., 1992). The 5-HT1Breceptors modulate serotonergic transmission by a presynaptic autoreceptor function (Middlemiss et al., 1988; Hamblin et al., 1992). They also appear to function as presynaptic heteroreceptors and have been shown to regulate the release of norepinephrine, glutamate, acetylcholine, and γ-aminobutyric acid (Raiteri et al., 1986; Hoyer and Middlemiss, 1989; Molderings et al., 1990; Hen, 1992). Furthermore, they may also play a role in the presynaptic inhibition of neuropeptide release (substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide) (Buzzi et al., 1991; Moskowitz, 1992; Bonaventure et al., 1998a). The 5-HT1B receptors are widely distributed in the brain but are particularly abundant on axon terminals in the output structures of the basal ganglia (globus pallidus and substantia nigra) (Waeber et al., 1989; Bruinvels et al., 1993; Boschert et al., 1994;Langlois et al., 1995; Bonaventure et al., 1997, 1998b). Because of their role in the regulation of multiple neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, 5-HT1B receptors could be a target for the development of new therapeutic agents in the field of depression and migraine, among others (Halazy et al., 1997).
Despite an amino acid sequence identity of more than 90% with the human (h)5-HT1B receptor, the rodent 5-HT1B receptors display different ligand binding properties than their human homolog. For example, the antimigraine agent alniditan binds with a 50-fold higher affinity to the human compared with the rodent 5-HT1B receptor, whereas CP93129 and certain adrenergic antagonists bind more potently to the rodent receptor (Hamblin et al., 1992; Bach et al., 1993; Leysen et al., 1996; Zgombick et al., 1997). These differences in pharmacological properties result from an amino acid substitution at position 355, being asparagine in rat and mouse and threonine in the human receptor (Metcalf et al., 1992; Oksenberg et al., 1992; Parker et al., 1993).
As a consequence of this species difference, rats and mice are not suitable or representative for testing the pharmacological properties of h5-HT1B receptor agonists and antagonists. Transgenic animal technology has provided tools to delete or replace genes that encode receptors; hence, genes can be “humanized,” and the function of the human protein can be studied in the transgenic animal. Mutant mice lacking a functional gene encoding the 5-HT1B receptor have been generated by homologous recombination, resulting in mice with increased aggressive behavior (Saudou et al., 1994).
In the present study, an animal model to investigate the h5-HT1B receptor was generated using a “knock-in” technology (i.e., by “humanizing” the mouse locus), producing mice that express the h5-HT1B receptor instead of its murine counterpart but from the same genetic locus. We report the characterization and functional authentication of the h5-HT1B receptor as expressed in the brain of homozygous transgenic animals. The distribution patterns of h5-HT1B and murine (m)5-HT1B receptor mRNA and binding sites in transgenic and wild-type mice were compared by quantitative in situ hybridization histochemistry (ISHH) and receptor autoradiography throughout the brain with two different radioligands (i.e., the antagonist [3H]GR125743, which recognizes both m5-HT1B and h5-HT1Breceptors [Mengod et al., 1996; Audinot et al., 1997; Domenech et al., 1997] and the agonist [3H]alniditan, which is selective for h5-HT1B receptors [Leysen et al., 1996]. Additionally, [3H]GR125743 concentration binding curves were obtained from brain sections containing the substantia nigra and globus pallidus of wild-type and transgenic animals. Differential identification was performed by measuring the potency of several compounds [alniditan, rauwolscine, 8-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetraline (8-OH-DPAT), CP93129, RU24969, pindolol, propranolol, sumatriptan, and 5-HT) to inhibit binding of [3H]GR125743 in transgenic and wild-type mice and in human brain sections by quantitative receptor autoradiography. In transgenic mouse brain, the functional coupling of the h5-HT1B receptor to G protein activation was established by quantitative autoradiography of [35S]guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPγS) binding after stimulation by nonselective agonists [5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) and 5-HT] or agonists selective for the mouse (CP93129) or human (alniditan) 5-HT1B receptors. Modulation of electrically evoked [3H]5-HT release by a selective 5-HT1B antagonist (SB224389) was studied in slices of transgenic mouse cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. In vivo effects (i.e., RU24969-induced locomotor activity and effects on body temperature) that are reported to be modulated by 5-HT1B receptor activation (Ramboz et al., 1996;Hagan et al., 1997) were also investigated in these “humanized” mice.
Experimental Procedures
Materials.
The mouse strain genomic library was obtained from Genome Systems (St. Louis, MO). The pSG5 expression vector, pBS (KS−) vector, and Pful DNA polymerase were purchased from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Trizol reagent was from GIBCO BRL (Merelbeke, Belgium).
[3H]Alniditan (41.4 Ci/mmol) was synthesized at Janssen Pharmaceutica (Beerse, Belgium). [3H]GR125743 (73 Ci/mmol), [35S]UTP (1250 Ci/mmol), and [35S]GTPγS (1053 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Dupont-NEN (Zaventem, Belgium). GDP and GTPγS were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). [3H]5-HT (106 Ci/mmol), Hyperfilm-3H, Hyperfilm MP, Hyperfilm-βmax,14C and 3H standards strips were obtained from Amersham (Paisley, UK). All other reagents were from Merck (Overijse, Belgium) or Sigma (Bornem, Belgium). The compounds listed in Table 3 were obtained from various commercial sources or kindly donated by the companies of origin.
Potency of compounds (pIC50 values; 95% confidence interval in parentheses) for inhibition of [3H]GR125743 (2 nM) binding in wild-type or transgenic mouse or in human brain sections, measured using quantitative receptor autoradiography (n = 3)
Generation of h5-HT1B Receptor Transgenic Mice.
The replacement or knock-in construct was based on the h5-HT1B receptor gene (Jin et al., 1992), cloned in a pUC18 vector and on a genomic BAC clone containing the homologous mouse gene isolated from a mouse 129 strain genomic library (clone address BAC-231-B2). Both genes are intronless and thus easily manipulated. A 1173-bp EcoRI/BamHI fragment containing the h5-HT1B receptor gene was subcloned in the pSG5 expression vector and amplified with adaptor primers containing suitable restriction sites (NcoI, underlined): forward primer 5′-ATAGCTAGCAGGCCTGCCACCATGGAGGAACCGGGTGCTCAG-3′ including the ATG translation start codon of the human receptor gene (reverse complement, CAT, in bold) and reverse primer 5′-CCAGCCATGGTAAGATACATTGATGAGTTTGGACA-3′, located 3′ of the polyadenylation signal in pSG5. A 1.4-kb NcoI fragment encoding the human receptor gene with the SV40 polyadenylation signal of the vector was isolated.
A 6.2-kb EcoRI fragment of the 129 mouse genomic BAC clone, containing the m5-HT1B receptor gene, was subcloned in the pBS (KS−) vector creating vector pmHTR. The 5′ promoter region was amplified with, as forward primer, the T3 primer of the pBS vector and reverse primer 5′-TGCACCTNAGGCCATGGCTCTCCTCGTCCTGGCTG-3′, including the ATG translation startcodon (in bold) of the mouse receptor gene, creating SauI (in italics) andNcoI (underlined) restriction sites. The resulting 2-kb amplicon was digested with NotI and SauI and ligated into the pmHTR vector from which most of the gene was deleted by double digestion with NotI (site located in the polylinker of the pBS vector) and SauI (site located in the 3′ untranslated region of the m5-HT1B gene). Thus, about 2 kb of the mouse promoter region was conserved in this vector, and the mouse coding sequences with about 1.2 kb of the 3′ untranslated sequence (Maroteaux et al., 1992) were deleted. The created NcoI site then received the 1.4-kb NcoI fragment encoding the human receptor decoding sequences. The construct was completed by insertion in the SauI site of the 2-kb cassette containing the phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK)-hygromycin (HYG) minigene used as a positive selection marker in embryonic stem (ES) cells. In summary, the construct contained (from 5′ to 3′ direction) a 2-kb fragment of the m5-HT1B gene promoter, a 1.2-kb fragment encompassing the h5-HT1B gene coding sequence, about 200 bp representing the SV40 3′ untranslated region including its polyadenylation signal, the 2-kb cassette of the PGK gene promoter and HYG selection marker gene, and finally about 1.5 kb of the 3′ untranslated region of the m5-HT1Breceptor gene (Fig. 1). All PCR amplifications were performed with PfuI DNA polymerase, and the entire construct was sequenced before linearization bySalI restriction and introduction into ES cells by electroporation.
Transgenic targeting construct, genotyping of ES cells, and analysis of mRNA expression. A, recombinant DNA construct used to target the m5-HT1B receptor gene and replace it with the h5-HT1B receptor gene. The black box represents the coding sequence of the intronless h5-HT1B receptor gene; the hatched box represents the HYG marker gene, which was embedded in the SauI restriction site (S); and the small box with bricks represents the SV40 polyadenylation signal. The uniqueSalI restriction site used to linearize the construct is also indicated. The wild-type m5-HT1B receptor gene (intronless) containing the coding sequence is represented by the gray box. Relevant restriction sites are shown: KpnI (K),EcoRV (E), and SauI (S). R (right) and L (left) represent the position of the genomic DNA probes, located externally to the genomic region that was targeted and used in the construct (white box). The predicted structure of the targeted 5-HT receptor gene contains the elements from the targeting vector (described above) and predicts the loss of the wild-type 3.4- and 7-kbKpnI fragments and of the 4.4-kb EcoRV fragment, while generating a 11.2-kb KpnI fragment and a 3.9-kb EcoRV fragment (▴, all boundaries). ▵, position of the primers used for PCR amplification (sequences given inExperimental Procedures). B, example of Southern blot of DNA isolated from one of the four selected ES cell lines, digested withKpnI or EcoRV as indicated, and hybridized with the different probes (R, L, and HYG). See text and A for details. The leftmost lane (M) represents radiolabeled DNA markers with the approximate size indicated. C, Northern blot of total RNA isolated from the cerebrum, cerebellum, and liver of wild-type mice (lanes 1), heterozygous targeted mice (lanes 2), and homozygous targeted, humanized 5-HT1B mice (lanes 3). The blot was hybridized with the m5-HT1B receptor probe (top), the h5-HT1B receptor probe (middle), and a β-actin cDNA probe (bottom).
The ES cells (line E14, Hooper et al., 1987), grown on mitomycin STO (mouse fibroblast cell line, thioguanine and ouabain resistant) feederlayers, were positively selected in medium containing HYG (100 μg/ml). Colonies were picked, expanded, and genotyped by Southern blotting as previously described (Umans et al., 1995).
The following DNA fragments were isolated from the original mouse genomic BAC clone and used as probes for genotyping the ES cell lines: a 1.2-kb KpnI/EcoRI genomic DNA fragment located 5′ of the gene (L probe, Fig. 1) and a 0.6-kbEcoRI/EcoRV genomic DNA fragment located 3′ of the gene (R probe, Fig. 1). In addition, a 1.6-kb BgIII fragment of the PGK HYG cassette was used as an internal probe (Umans et al., 1995).
Homozygous deficient mice were obtained, and the presence of the mutated allele and its Mendelian inheritance were demonstrated by Southern blotting on isolated tail-DNA as described previously (Umans et al., 1995).
Routine genotyping was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on genomic DNA, isolated from mouse tail biopsy samples as described previously (Umans et al., 1995). The PCR mixture contained (total volume of 50 μl) 0.2 μM concentration of each primer, 200 μM concentration of each dNTP, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris·HCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Both the wild-type m5-HT1B receptor allele and the targeted allele containing the h5-HT1B receptor gene were amplified with forward primer 5′-CAGCCAGCAAACTCCTTC-3′ (position 79) and reverse primer 5′-GAGACTCGCACTTTGACTTGG-3′ (position 1421) (Maroteaux et al., 1992). This generated a 1342-bp amplicon for the wild-type allele and a 1351-bp amplicon from the targeted allele, which were digested withEcoRV, resulting in diagnostic bands of 867 and 475 bp for the wild-type allele and the intact 1351-bp amplicon for the targeted allele (position of primers is indicated in Fig. 1).
RNA Extraction and Northern Blotting.
Total RNA was extracted and purified from cerebrum, cerebellum, spleen, and liver of wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous mice. The isolated organs were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C until RNA extractions were performed with Trizol reagent. Tissue (100 mg) was mechanically homogenized (Virtis) in 1 ml of reagent and centrifuged at 16,000g for 15 min at 4°C. Chloroform (0.2 ml) was added to the supernatant, shaken vigorously, and left at ambient temperature for 3 min. After centrifugation at 16,000g for 10 min at 4°C, the aqueous phase containing RNA was mixed with 0.5 ml of isopropyl alcohol. After 15 min at ambient temperature, the RNA was pelleted at 16,000g for 10 min at 4°C. The RNA pellet was washed in 1 ml of 75% ethanol, resuspended in deionized formamide, stored at −70°C. The concentration of RNA in the samples was measured spectrophotometrically at 260 nm. Then, 10 μg of total RNA was separated and blotted as described previously (Lorent et al., 1994). The h5-HT1B receptor mRNA transcript was detected with a probe that represented the entire 1.3-kb human cDNA. The m5-HT1B receptor probe was a 0.7-kb fragment generated by PCR with forward primer 5′-CATTTACCAGGACTCCATCGC-3′ (position 651 in the mouse cDNA) and reverse primer 5′-GAGACTCGCACTTTGACTTGG-3′ (position 1421 in the mouse cDNA) (Maroteaux et al., 1992). Equal loading of mRNA was authenticated by hybridization with a 2-kb β-actin cDNA probe (Umans et al., 1995).
Tissue Preparation for ISHH and Radioligand Autoradiography.
Transgenic or wild-type mice (20–35 g) were decapitated. Brains were immediately removed from the skull and rapidly frozen in dry-ice-cooled 2-methylbutane (−40°C). Then, 20-μm-thick frontal sections were cut using a Reichert Jung 2800E cryostat-microtome (Cambridge Instruments, Cambridge, UK) and thaw-mounted on adhesive microscope slides (Super Frost). The sections were kept at −70°C until use. The sectioning protocol for the regional distribution study included series of coronal sections covering the entire brain (n = 3–6) with an interspace of 300 μm. Consecutive sections were used for ISHH, receptor autoradiography with [3H]GR125743 and [3H]alniditan. One additional brain was used for horizontal sections; six additional brains were sectioned in the coronal plane at the level of globus pallidus and substantia nigra and used to generate inhibition curves and concentration binding curves (see below) and for autoradiography of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding.
Human brains were obtained from the University of Antwerp. Tissue blocks (1 cm thick) were cut and frozen in dry ice-cooled 2-methylbutane (−40°C). Frontal sections (20 μm thick) were cut and thaw-mounted on adhesive microscope slides. The sections were kept at −70°C until use.
Quantitative ISHH.
ISHH was performed with [35S]UTP-labeled cRNA probes as described previously (Bonaventure et al., 1998b). A segment of DNA encoding the h5-HT1B receptor (full length; Leysen et al., 1996) was subcloned into pRcCMV. Riboprobes were produced using a SP6 (antisense) or T7 (sense) transcription system in a standard labeling reaction mixture (Bonaventure et al., 1998b). Brain sections were thawed and fixed in paraformaldehyde, acetylated, dehydrated, and delipidated. The fixed sections were hybridized with 1 × 106 cpm [35S]UTP-labeled riboprobe per section. The diluted probe was applied to sections and hybridized at 50°C overnight in a humid chamber. After stringency washes, sections were exposed to Hyperfilm-3H for 4 weeks. 14C-standard strips previously cross-calibrated to 35S were coexposed to allow densitometry. Films were developed manually in Kodak D-19 and fixed with Kodak Readymatic. The following control experiments were performed to determine the specificity of the hybridization signal: ISHH with sense probe and RNase treatment before hybridization with antisense probe.
Receptor Autoradiography.
Sections were thawed and dried under a cold air stream and then preincubated three times for 5 min in 50 mM Tris·HCl buffer, pH 7.4, at an ambient temperature by immersing the sections on the microscope slides into a 400-ml jar. Next, they were incubated (drop incubation, 150 μl placed on each section) for 60 min at an ambient temperature in medium containing 4 nM [3H]alniditan or 2 nM [3H]GR125743, 50 mM Tris·HCl buffer, pH 7.4, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% BSA, 0.01% ascorbic acid, and 2 μM pargyline (Bonaventure et al., 1998b). To measure [3H]alniditan binding, 100 nM 8-OH-DPAT was added to occlude the 5-HT1A receptors. For concentration binding curves, [3H]GR125743 was used at 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10 nM. Inhibition of [3H]GR125743 binding by alniditan, 8-OH-DPAT, rauwolscine, CP93129, RU24969, pindolol, propranolol, sumatriptan, and 5-HT (using 15 concentrations per compound, within a range of 10−11 to 10−4 M) was performed on mouse brain sections at the level of the globus pallidus and substantia nigra and on human substantia nigra sections. Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of 10 μM 5-HT. After incubation, the excess of radioligand was washed off by immersing the microscope slides in a jar (five times for 1 min) with Tris·HCl buffer, pH 7.4, at 4°C followed by a quick rinse in water and drying under a cold air stream. The sections and standard tritiated plastic microscales were placed in a light-tight cassette and covered with a light-sensitive Hyperfilm-3H. After 6 weeks’ exposure, they were developed manually in Kodak D-19 developer for 2 min and fixed with Kodak Readymatic for 3 min.
Quantitative Autoradiography of Agonist-Stimulated [35S]GTPγS Binding.
[35S]GTPγS binding was visualized using the method described by Waeber and Moskowitz (1997) with slight modifications. Briefly, the tissue sections, brought to an ambient temperature 15 min before the experiments, were incubated for 30 min at an ambient temperature in 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EGTA, 0.01% BSA, and 0.2 mM dithiothreitol; they were incubated for an additional 15 min in the same fresh buffer supplemented with 2 mM GDP. Agonist-stimulated binding was measured by incubating the sections for 60 min at 30°C in buffer containing 2 mM GDP, 0.04 nM [35S]GTPγS, and 10 μM agonist (alniditan, CP93129, 5-HT, or 5-CT). Basal activity was determined in the absence of agonist. Nonspecific binding was assessed by including 10 μM unlabeled GTPγS in the incubation buffer. Slices were washed twice for 3 min in ice-cold 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0, dipped briefly in ice-cold distilled water, dried under a cold air stream, and exposed to Hyperfilm-βmax for 72 h. 14C standards strips previously cross-calibrated to 35S standards were coexposed to allow densitometry. Films were developed manually in Kodak D-19 (2 min) and fixed with Kodak Readymatic (3 min).
Data Analysis of ISHH, Receptor Autoradiography, and Agonist-Stimulated [35S]GTPγS Binding.
Autoradiograms of ISHH, radioligand, or [35S]GTPγS binding were analyzed and quantified using an MCID-M4 3.0 image analysis system (Imaging Research, St-Catharines, Ontario, Canada). Optical densities in the anatomical regions of interest were transformed into levels of bound radioactivity after calibration of the image analyzer with gray values generated by the coexposed standards. The hybridization signal was expressed as dpm/mg tissue.
Radioligand binding signal in the absence and presence of competitors was expressed in fmol/mg wet weight tissue equivalent. Nonspecific ligand binding was determined in adjacent sections incubated with 10 μM 5-HT.
Ligand concentration binding curves and sigmoidal inhibition curves were generated and fitted by nonlinear regression analysis using Prism software (GraphPAD; San Diego, CA). TheBmax, KD, and pIC50 (−log IC50) values were derived from the curve calculation. The IC50is the concentration producing 50% inhibition of specific radioligand binding. Agonist-induced [35S]GTPγS was expressed as percentage of basal binding (% stimulation = 100 × [stimulated − basal]/basal).
In Vitro Electrically Evoked [3H]5-HT Release Experiments.
To save mice, the animals used for the in vitro release studies had been used previously in behavioral tests. Before sacrifice, both transgenic and wild-type mice had been drug free for at least 21 days.
Female mice were decapitated, and the brain was immediately removed from the skull and put on ice. Cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum were quickly dissected and stored in ice-cold Krebs’ buffer containing 118 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 25 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose, 1.7 mM CaCl2, 0.57 mM ascorbate, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.01 mM pargyline saturated with 95% O2/5% CO2. The tissue was chopped into 300 × 300-μm slices and washed with Krebs’ buffer. After a 15-min preincubation in continuously bubbled Krebs’ buffer at 37°C, the tissue from each brain area was incubated for 20 min at 37°C in 2 ml of Krebs’ buffer containing 20 nM [3H]5-HT. After three washing steps, the tissue slices were transferred to 200-μl tissue chambers of two superfusion systems (SF2000; Brandell). The tissue was continuously superfused with 95% O2/5% CO2 saturated Krebs’ buffer containing 10 μM paroxetine at 37°C at a rate of 0.4 ml/min with the direction of the flow against gravity. After 50 min, 18 fractions of 4 min were collected. At 8 and 48 min after the start of fraction collection, the tissue was electrically stimulated (3 Hz, 30 mA, 2-ms pulses; hippocampus and striatum for 2 min, cerebral cortex for 4 min) with a Brandell electrical stimulator (ES220). The first (at 8 min) and second (at 48 min) stimulus trains were named S1 and S2, respectively. Where appropriate, the antagonist was added to the superfusion buffer 25 min before S2, and the agonist was added 21 min before S2. At the end of the experiment, the tissue in each chamber was collected and lysed in 800 μl of 5 mM HCl/50% ethanol. The tritium overflow in each fraction was counted in a liquid scintillation counter (Packard). Fractional release was calculated per collected fraction by dividing the amount of tritium collected in the fraction by the total amount of tritium present in the tissue at the start of collection of the fraction. Electrically induced release by S1 and S2 was calculated by subtracting the basal release from the elevated fractions during the stimulations. Drug effects were calculated by dividing S2 (in the presence of compounds) by S1 (in the presence of buffer alone); thus each chamber served as its own control. Each drug condition was tested in quadruplicate. Mean values of S2/S1 ratios from at least four experiments per drug condition per brain area were compared with the “no drug” control S2/S1 ratio using a Student’s t test.
In Vivo Functional Studies: Locomotor Activity and Hypothermia.
To reduce the number of animals used, we resorted to a protocol in which the same animals received increasing doses of drugs.
Male mice were 10 weeks old at the time of testing (n = 5 per group). They were housed alone in a standard cage with food and water and kept on a 12/12 h light/dark cycle. The mice were tested between 12:00 noon and 4:00 PM during the light phase. Esophageal temperature was monitored by gently inserting the thermosensitive probe (1.0-mm diameter) of an electronic thermometer (Comark) to a constant depth of 4 cm for a period of 15 s until a stable reading was obtained. Locomotor activity was measured by placing individual animals into a circular open field (29-cm inner diameter) bordered by a transparent screen 30 min after injection. Lines on the floor divided the open field into four equivalent quadrants and the number of crossings was counted over 5 min.
All the mice studied were first given the vehicle (t = 0). Thirty minutes later, the mice were placed in the open field, and locomotor activity was measured over 5 min (t = 30–35 min). At t = 35 min, body temperature was monitored. The mice then received the second injection with either the first dose of RU24969 (n = 5) or vehicle (n = 5), and the same protocol (locomotor activity, t = 65–70 min; body temperature, t = 70 min) was applied. The same procedure was repeated for the following doses.
RU24969 was dissolved in saline and administered s.c. at doses of 0.16, 0.63, 2.5, and 10 mg/kg b.wt. in a volume of 10 ml/kg b.wt.
An additional experiment (n = 6, three males and three females per group) was performed in which a 5-HT1B receptor antagonist (GR127935, 2.5 mg/kg s.c.) or a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (WAY100635, 2.5 mg/kg s.c.) was administered 30 min before RU24969 (2.5 mg/kg s.c.). Temperature was measured before antagonist administration (t = −30 min), before RU24969 administration (t = 0 min), and 30 min after agonist administration (t = 30 min). GR127935 and WAY100635 were dissolved in saline and administered s.c. at a concentration of 2.5 mg/kg b.wt. in a volume of 10 ml/kg b.wt.
Statistical Analysis.
The results are presented as mean ± S.D. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-ranks test (two-tailed) was used for comparing treated versus vehicle groups. The Mann-WhitneyU test (two-tailed) was used for comparison of wild-type with transgenic animals and for comparing antagonist-treated versus vehicle group.
Results
Targeting of m5-HT1B Receptor Gene by h5-HT1B Receptor Gene
In the targeting construct, the mouse coding sequence was replaced by the human under the control of the mouse promoter and a necessary positive selection marker was placed downstream of the gene in aSauI site, in antisense orientation to minimally affect expression of the 5-HT1B gene (Fig. 1A). The replacement vector was linearized at the unique SalI site and electroporated into ES cells. Cells surviving electroporation were grown in selective medium containing HYG, resulting in several thousands of colonies, of which 342 were isolated, expanded, and analyzed by genomic Southern blotting.
The first genotyping of these 342 colonies was by Southern blotting after restriction with KpnI and hybridization with the L probe to reveal fragments of 3.4 kb from the wild-type and 11.2 kb from the targeted allele (Fig. 1, A and B). By this criterion, 18 targeted ES cell lines were retained and expanded. DNA from these 18 lines was then analyzed with all three probes (L, R, and HYG, Fig. 1), yielding four ES cell lines with the expected KpnI restriction patterns. These lines were further authenticated by restriction withEcoRV and confirmed to contain a single copy of the PGK-HYG cassette (Fig. 1).
The four correctly targeted ES cell lines, representing an overall recombination frequency of 1.2%, were injected into C57Bl blastocysts and all resulted in coat color chimeric mice that transmitted the targeted gene through the germline. A total of 172 pups with brown coat color were analyzed by Southern blotting of tail-tip DNA, identifying 48 female and 43 male heterozygous mice (total of 53%) that were mated and used to establish homozygous offspring. In total, 154 pups resulting from matings of heterozygous animals were genotyped by Southern blotting of tail-tip DNA after restriction withEcoRV. This identified 46 wild-type mice (29.9%), 72 heterozygous mice (46.8%), and 36 homozygous targeted mice (23.3%), clearly establishing a normal Mendelian inheritance pattern.
Expression of 5-HT1B Receptor mRNA
Total RNA isolated from cerebrum, cerebellum, spleen, and liver was analyzed by Northern blotting (Fig. 1C). The h5-HT1B receptor cDNA probe revealed transcripts of about 2 to 2.4 kb in the cerebrum and cerebellum of heterozygous and homozygous targeted mice. The difference in size from those normally expressed in human tissue as described (Jin et al., 1992) results from the use of a different 3′-UTR in our construct, incorporating the SV40 poly(A)+ signal from the pSG5 vector (see Experimental Procedures). No equivalent h5-HT1B receptor transcripts were detected in wild-type mice. Subsequent hybridization of the same blots with the m5-HT1B receptor cDNA probe revealed a 6-kb transcript as expected (Maroteaux et al., 1992) in wild-type and in heterozygous mice, whereas no transcript was detected in the homozygous h5-HT1B receptor recombinant mice. No transcripts were detected in the liver of these same animals with either probe (Fig. 1C).
Quantitative ISHH
Control experiments were carried out to determine the specificity of the hybridization. Incubation with sense probe or RNase pretreatment before hybridization with antisense probe did not yield a hybridization signal (result not shown). The [35S]cRNA probe generated by in vitro transcription from full-length cDNA coding for the h5-HT1B receptor has been used for hybridization on transgenic and wild-type mouse brain sections. The high percentage of sequence identity (88%) between the h5-HT1B and m5-HT1Breceptor gene allows a direct comparison using the same35S-labeled riboprobes between h5-HT1B and m5-HT1Breceptor mRNA levels of expression in transgenic and wild-type mice, respectively.
The distribution patterns of h5-HT1B and m5-HT1B receptor mRNA in homozygous transgenic and wild-type mice, respectively, were identical (Table1, Fig. 2). Also, the h5-HT1B and m5-HT1B receptor mRNA densities measured in transgenic and wild-type animals were comparable (Table 1).
Distribution and quantification of 5-HT1B receptor mRNA in wild-type and transgenic mice using quantitative in situ hybridization histochemistry
Comparison of the anatomic distribution of m5-HT1B and h5-HT1B receptor mRNA in autoradiograms of a horizontal section of the wild-type (A) and transgenic (B) mouse brain, respectively. OT, olfactory tubercle; CPu, caudate putamen; Hip, hippocampal formation; DR, dorsal raphe nucleus; Cer, cerebellum. Note that the distribution patterns and densities are completely similar in transgenic and wild-type mouse brain. Scale bar, 5 mm.
The main sites of 5-HT1B receptor mRNA expression in both wild-type and transgenic mice were the caudate-putamen, the CA1 field of the hippocampal formation, and the Purkinje cell layer of the cerebellum (Fig. 2, Table 1). High 5-HT1Breceptor mRNA levels could also be detected in the dorsal raphe nucleus (Table 1), nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle (not quantified). Moderate expression was found in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus (Table 1) and throughout the cortical mantle (not quantified). No significant levels of 5-HT1B receptor mRNA were detected within the globus pallidus and the substantia nigra of transgenic and wild-type animals.
Anatomic Distribution of [3H]GR125743 and [3H]Alniditan Binding Sites in Transgenic and Wild-Type Mouse Brain
The distribution pattern of 5-HT1B binding sites in transgenic and wild-type mouse brain was compared by radioligand binding autoradiography in frontal sections. Two different radioligands were used: the antagonist [3H]GR125743, recognizing m5-HT1B and h5-HT1Breceptors, and the agonist [3H]alniditan, recognizing h5-HT1B receptors selectively under the conditions used. Illustrations of receptor labeling in the ventral pallidum of wild-type and transgenic mouse are shown in Fig.3. A list of quantified [3H]GR125743 (2 nM) and [3H]alniditan (4 nM) binding sites in wild-type and transgenic mouse brain areas is presented in Table 1.
[3H]GR125743 (2 nM) (A–D) and [3H]alniditan (4 nM) (E–H) binding in ventral pallidum of transgenic (A, B, E, and F) and wild-type mice (C, D, G, and H) visualized by receptor autoradiography (frontal sections). B, D, F, and H, nonspecific binding in the presence of 10 μM 5-HT. VP, ventral pallidum. Note the absence of [3H]alniditan labeling in wild-type mouse ventral pallidum (G, open arrow). Scale bar, 5 mm.
The pattern of [3H]GR125743 binding sites throughout the transgenic and wild-type mouse brain was completely similar (Table 1, Fig. 3). Consistently, higher [3H]GR125743 binding densities were measured in wild-type mouse brain, which is confirmed by the ligand concentration binding curves (see below). In both wild-type and transgenic animals, the highest densities were found in the two output structures of the basal ganglia (substantia nigra and globus pallidus). Medium-dense labeling was observed in the superficial layer of the superior colliculus, dorsal subiculum, CA1 field of the hippocampal formation, and central gray. Weak binding was found in the caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, interpeduncular nucleus, and lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus.
With [3H]alniditan, the same distribution pattern as obtained with [3H]GR125743 was found in transgenic mouse brain, but no specific labeling was detected in wild-type mice (Table 1, Fig. 3). The labeling intensity of [3H]alniditan in transgenic mice was lower than the intensity measured with [3H]GR125743 (Table1).
Ligand Concentration Binding Curves
To compare the receptor density of the h5-HT1B receptor expressed in transgenic mice and the m5-HT1B receptor in wild-type mice, concentration binding curves of [3H]GR125743 were performed on brain sections at two levels: the substantia nigra and the globus pallidus.
Transgenic and wild-type mice of the same age (10 weeks) were used in this study.
Derived Bmax andKD values are listed in Table2. The nonspecific binding determined in the presence of 10 μM 5-HT was linear. The affinity of [3H]GR125743 was comparable in wild-type and transgenic animals based on the overlap between the 95% confidence interval of KD values (Table 2). TheBmax values were higher in the substantia nigra than in the globus pallidus (Table 2). In both regions, higherBmax values were found in wild-type mice. The level of [3H]GR125743 binding sites measured in transgenic mice reached approximately 70% of [3H]GR125743 binding sites in wild-type mice.
Binding parameters derived from ligand concentration binding curves [3H]GR125743 in substantia nigra and globus pallidus of wild-type and transgenic mice
Inhibition of [3H]GR125743 Binding in Transgenic Mice, Wild-Type Mice, and Human Brain Sections
Further pharmacological characterization was performed by measuring the potency of several compounds (alniditan, rauwolscine, 8-OH-DPAT, CP93129, RU24969, pindolol, propranolol, sumatriptan, and 5-HT) to inhibit specific [3H]GR125743 binding in wild-type and transgenic mouse and in human brain sections using quantitative autoradiography.
Inhibition curves were generated from measurements in substantia nigra and globus pallidus. The pIC50 values are listed in Table 3.
Alniditan, rauwolscine, and 8-OH-DPAT displayed a higher affinity for the h5-HT1B receptor than for the m5-HT1B receptor (Table 3). CP93129, RU24969, pindolol, and propranolol showed a higher affinity for the mouse receptor (Table 3). The absence of inhibition of [3H]GR125743 binding in the transgenic mouse substantia nigra by CP93129 is illustrated in Fig.4. The affinities of sumatriptan and 5-HT were similar for the transgenic and wild-type mouse receptors (Table3). The pIC50 values derived from the inhibition curves in transgenic mouse and human substantia nigra were very similar; a highly significant correlation between pIC50 values in both tissues was obtained (Table3; Fig. 5A; r Pearson = .98; p < .0001). In contrast, no significant correlation was found between the binding affinities of the compounds for the m5-HT1B receptor in wild-type animals and the h5-HT1B receptor expressed in transgenic animals (r = .18, p > .05, Fig. 5B) or the h5-HT1B receptor in human substantia nigra (r = .05, p > .05, Fig. 5C).
Inhibition of [3H]GR125743 binding by CP93129 (3 μM) in wild-type (A–C) or transgenic (D–F) mice and in human substantia nigra (G–I) visualized by receptor autoradiography (frontal sections). A, D, and G, total binding. B, E, and H, binding in the presence of 3 μM CP93129. C, F, and I, nonspecific binding in the presence of 10 μM 5-HT. SN, substantia nigra; Sub, subiculum. Note the absence of inhibition of [3H]GR125743 in the transgenic mouse substantia nigra (B, open arrow) and in human brain. Scale bar, 5 mm.
Correlation between pIC50 values of compounds (see Table 3) for (A) the 5-HT1B receptor in human substantia nigra and the 5-HT1B receptor in transgenic mouse substantia nigra, (B) the 5-HT1B receptor in wild-type mouse substantia nigra and the 5-HT1B receptor expressed in transgenic mouse substantia nigra, and (C) the 5-HT1B receptor from wild-type mouse substantia nigra and the 5-HT1B receptor from human substantia nigra. The correlation coefficient (r Pearson) is listed in each panel. Note the high correlation coefficient between the pIC50 values for the h5-HT1B receptor expressed in transgenic mouse and the human substantia nigra.
Quantitative Autoradiography of Agonist (5-HT, 5-CT, CP93129, and Alniditan)-Stimulated [35S]GTPγS Binding in Transgenic and Wild-Type Mouse Brain Sections
The functional coupling of the h5-HT1Breceptor expressed in transgenic animals to G protein activation was investigated and compared with that of the mouse receptor by using quantitative autoradiography of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding. As previously reported (Waeber and Moskowitz, 1997), optimal agonist stimulation was observed in the presence of 10 μM agonist and 2 mM GDP at 30°C. Basal activity was determined in the absence of agonist and nonspecific binding in the presence of 10 μM GTPγS. The specificity of the agonist-induced signal was demonstrated by inhibiting the labeling with a 5-HT1B receptor antagonist (GR127935, results not shown). Percentages of agonist-induced stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding are reported in Table4; autoradiograms are shown in Fig.6. Both 5-HT and 5-CT stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding in the substantia nigra and globus pallidus of wild-type and transgenic animals, with the highest stimulation in substantia nigra. The percentage of stimulation measured in the presence of 5-CT was higher than that in the presence of 5-HT (Table 4) in both wild-type and transgenic mice. For both agonists (i.e., 5-HT and 5-CT), the percentage of stimulation observed in wild-type mice was higher than that in transgenic animals. The selective rodent 5-HT1B receptor agonist CP93129 was effective in wild-type but not in transgenic mice (Table 4, Fig. 6, E and F). Conversely, alniditan (a selective h5-HT1B agonist) stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding in transgenic but not in wild-type animals (Table 4, Fig. 6, G and H).
Quantitative autoradiography of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding in transgenic and wild-type mouse brain
Effect of agonists on [35S]GTPγS binding in wild-type (A, C, E, G, and I) or transgenic (B, D, F, H, and J) mouse substantia nigra visualized by autoradiography (frontal sections). A and B, stimulated by 10 μM 5-HT. C and D, stimulated by 10 μM 5-CT. E and F, stimulated by 10 μM CP93129. G and H, stimulated by 10 μM alniditan. I and J, basal activity. SN, substantia nigra. Note the absence of stimulation of CP93129 in transgenic mouse substantia nigra and the stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding by alniditan in transgenic mouse substantia nigra (open arrow, F and H). Scale bar, 5 mm.
Modulation of [3H]5-HT Release: Effects on Basal and Electrically Evoked Release of Mouse Strain and Pharmacological Modulation
Basal and electrically induced overflow of [3H]5-HT from cerebral cortex, hippocampal, and striatal slices were studied in both wild-type and transgenic mice to evaluate the functional activity of the 5-HT1Breceptor in the two strains. The effect on 5-HT1Breceptors by exogenously applied agonist or antagonist was measured on basal and electrically stimulated 3H overflow. An appropriate agonist was used for the strains: 1 μM RU24969 for the wild-type mice and 1 μM alniditan for the transgenic mice. The applied concentrations were 30-fold above their pIC50 values to inhibit [3H]GR125743 binding to 5-HT1B receptors in brain sections of wild-type and transgenic mice.
Electrically stimulated 3H release in the absence of added drugs was lower in the hippocampus of wild-type than in that of transgenic mice (Table 5,p < .0001, Student’s t test); in the other brain areas, no difference was seen between the two strains. Also, the evoked release compared with basal was significantly bigger in transgenic than in wild-type mouse hippocampus (Table 5,p < .0001, Student’s t test). In none of the investigated brain areas of either mouse strain was a significant difference in the control S2/S1 ratios observed, measured in the absence of added drugs.
Strain effects on basal and non-drug-modulated in vitro [3H]5-HT release from wild-type and transgenic mouse brain regions
Neither agonist had a statistically significant effect on basal (fraction 12/fraction 2 ratio) or induced release (S2/S1 ratio) (Fig.7). The use of alniditan (1 μM) also failed to affect [3H]5-HT overflow in the three brain areas studied of the wild-type mice (data not shown). The m5-HT1B and h5-HT1Breceptor antagonist SB224289, however, was able to significantly increase the S2/S1 ratio in wild-type cerebral cortex and hippocampus but not in striatum. In cerebral cortex of wild-type mice, SB224289 had a tendency to increase basal release (fraction 12/fraction 2 = 113 ± 2.1% in control and 121 ± 4.2% in the presence of SB224289), but this effect on basal release did not reach statistical significance. In the transgenic mice, SB224289 did not affect basal or induced [3H]5-HT overflow in any of the brain areas investigated (Fig. 7).
Drug effects on electrically evoked [3H]5-HT release from cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum of wild-type and transgenic mice. Superfusion with 1 μM concentration of the drugs started 25 min (SB224289) and 21 min (RU24969) before S2; controls were simultaneously superfused with Krebs’ buffer only. All values are mean ± S.D. of four to seven experiments. The difference between drug treated and controls was statistically significant: *p < .05, **p < .01, Student’s t test.
In Vivo Functional Studies: Locomotor Activity and Hypothermia
The in vivo effect of a 5-HT1B agonist was investigated in both the transgenic and the wild-type mice on two parameters, locomotor activity and hypothermia, which are reported to be modulated by 5-HT1B receptor activation (Ramboz et al., 1996; Hagan et al., 1997). The 5-HT1B agonist RU24969 was used because of its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier.
Locomotor Activity.
In animals administered a single injection of vehicle, locomotor activity after 30 min was comparable in wild-type and transgenic mice (p > .05, two-tailed Mann-WhitneyU test; Fig. 8). No statistically significant difference was observed in habituation (seen as a decrease in locomotor activity on repeated testing with vehicle injections) between transgenic and wild-type mice (Fig. 8,p > .05, two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test). RU24969 caused a dose-related increase in locomotor activity in wild-type mice that reached significance from 0.63 mg/kg on (p < .05, two-tailed Wilcoxon PPSR test; Fig. 8A) and consisted of distinctive thigmotactic circling. No increase in locomotor activity or thigmotactic circling was observed in the transgenic mice (Fig. 8B).
Locomotor activity of wild-type (A) and transgenic (B) mice after s.c. injection of increasing doses of RU24969 (solid columns) or vehicle (open columns). The bars represent 5-min cumulative locomotor activity counts (crossings, mean ± S.D.;n = 5). Note the dose-related increase in locomotor activity in wild-type mice that reached significance at 0.63 mg/kg and the absence of effect in transgenic mice. *p < .05, two-tailed Wilcoxon MPSR test.
Hypothermia.
RU24969 caused a dose-related drop in wild-type mouse body temperature that reached significance from 0.63 mg/kg on (Fig. 9A). A less pronounced drop was observed in transgenic mouse body temperature, which reached significance from 2.5 mg/kg on (Fig. 9B). Body temperature was not significantly influenced by the vehicle, as shown in Fig. 9. After a single injection of RU 24969 at 2.5 mg/kg, a significant drop in body temperature was observed in wild-type but not in transgenic mice (Fig.10). The selective 5-HT1A antagonist WAY100635 (2.5 mg/kg) but not the selective 5-HT1B receptor antagonist GR127935 (2.5 mg/kg) significantly blocked the hypothermic effect of RU24969 induced in wild-type mice (p < .05 andp > .05, respectively, two-tailed Mann-WhitneyU test) (Fig. 10). GR127935 and WAY100635 per se did not affect body temperature in comparison with vehicle (p> .05, two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test).
Drop in esophageal temperature of wild-type (A) and transgenic (B) mice after s.c. injection of increasing doses of RU24969 (solid columns) or vehicle (open columns) (mean ± S.D.;n = 5). A, note that the drop in body temperature of wild-type mice occurs at lower dose than in transgenic mice (B). *p < .05, two-tailed Wilcoxon MPSR test.
Drop in esophageal temperature after administration of a 5-HT1B antagonist (GR127934, 2.5 mg/kg) or a 5-HT1A antagonist (WAY100635, 2.5 mg/kg) before the administration of RU24969 (2.5 mg/kg) (mean ± S.D.;n = 6). Note that WAY100635, but not GR127934, completely blocked the hypothermia induced by RU24969 in wild-type mice. *p < .05, two-tailed Mann-WhitneyU test. Dotted columns, wild-type mice; gray columns, transgenic mice.
Discussion
An animal model to study the h5-HT1Breceptor in vivo was generated by a “knock-in” method; by humanizing the mouse locus, mice were generated that express the h5-HT1B receptor instead of its murine counterpart from the same genetic locus. So far, functional studies of 5-HT1B receptors of relevance to human application have been hampered by the differences in the pharmacology between human and rodent receptors.
The “humanized” mice described in the present study developed and lived apparently normally.
Localization and Densities of h5-HT1B Receptor mRNA and Binding Sites Expressed in Transgenic Mouse Brain.
The anatomic patterns and relative densities of h5-HT1B and m5-HT1B receptor mRNA throughout the brain of transgenic and wild-type mouse were completely similar; therefore, there is no indication that the spatial (and temporal) regulation of transcription from the 5-HT1B gene is altered in transgenic animals (Table 1, Fig. 2, A and B). The anatomic patterns observed in this study also parallel a previous ISHH study in wild-type mouse brain (Boschert et al., 1994).
The radioligand [3H]GR125743 has been shown to be suitable for the labeling of human (Domenech et al., 1997), monkey, guinea pig, and rodent 5-HT1B receptors (Mengod et al., 1996; Audinot et al., 1997). It recognizes both high- and low-affinity states of the 5-HT1B receptors. [3H]Alniditan labels human, calf, and guinea pig 5-HT1B receptors (Leysen et al., 1996). Alniditan is an agonist at the h5-HT1B receptor and recognizes preferentially the high-affinity state of the h5-HT1B receptor (Leysen et al., 1996). It is important to note that the two radioligands used in the present receptor autoradiography studies (i.e., [3H]GR125743 and [3H]alniditan) also bind to the 5-HT1D receptor. Because for all ligands tested so far, no species differences between mouse and human 5-HT1D receptors have been reported, it is safe to state that 5-HT1D receptors do not interfere with the conclusions of the present mapping study. Furthermore, 5-HT1D binding sites account for a low percentage of the total of 5-HT1B plus 5-HT1D binding sites (Boschert et al., 1994;Bonaventure et al., 1998b).
The distribution of [3H]alniditan binding sites in transgenic mouse brain demonstrates the presence of h5-HT1B receptors because [3H]alniditan does not bind to the m5-HT1B receptor at nanomolar concentration (Table 1; Fig. 3) (Leysen et al., 1996). The distribution pattern of [3H]GR125743 and [3H]alniditan binding sites observed in the present study (Table 1) parallels those of previous localization studies performed in wild-type mouse brain (Boschert et al., 1994;Saudou et al., 1994) and is similar to the distribution found in other species (Bruinvels et al., 1993; Bonaventure et al., 1998b).
The Bmax values derived from the concentration binding studies of [3H]GR125743 show a difference in expression levels between the h5-HT1B receptor in transgenic mice and the m5-HT1B receptor expressed in wild-type mice (approximately 30% lower in transgenic mice; see Table 2).
Pharmacological Characterization of h5-HT1B Receptors Expressed in Transgenic Mouse Brain.
The pIC50 values derived from the radioligand binding inhibition study with various compounds in transgenic mouse and human substantia nigra brain sections were identical (Table 3). Inhibition of [3H]GR125743 binding by nine compounds was investigated. The pIC50 values that were determined in this study using autoradiography on brain sections of transgenic mice, human substantia nigra, and wild-type mice are in agreement with binding affinities determined on membrane preparations of cloned human and rodent 5-HT1B receptor expressed in cells, respectively (Hamblin et al., 1992; Bach et al., 1993; Leysen et al., 1996; Zgombick et al., 1997). The present pharmacological characterization demonstrates that after being expressed in the mouse brain, the human receptor shows the same pharmacological profile as the 5-HT1B receptor in human brain, which is indeed different from the pharmacological profile of the 5-HT1B receptor in mouse brain. The present study is also the first autoradiographic characterization of [3H]GR125743 binding sites in human tissue.
Functional Coupling of h5-HT1B Receptors Expressed in Transgenic Mouse Brain to G Proteins.
The observed stimulation of [35S]GTPγS binding by 5-CT, 5-HT, and alniditan in transgenic mice shows that the coupling between the h5-HT1B receptor and mouse G protein is possible. The higher percentage of stimulation measured with 5-HT and 5-CT in wild-type animals is probably a consequence of the higher receptor densities observed in wild-type mice; however, it could also reflect a less efficient coupling between a human receptor and a mouse G protein. The higher percentages of stimulation observed in substantia nigra compared with globus pallidus are probably the consequence of a higher receptor density in the former brain area.
Absence of Modulation of Electrically Evoked [3H]5-HT Release by SB224289 in Slices of Transgenic Mice.
The function of the 5-HT1B receptor was measured in vitro by studying its effects on [3H]5-HT release from tissue slices of cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. The ability of the selective 5-HT1B receptor antagonist SB224289 to potentiate [3H]5-HT release from electrically stimulated guinea pig cerebral cortical slices has recently been shown (Selkirk et al., 1998; M.H.M.B., I. Lenaerts and J.E.L., unpublished observations). Here, we demonstrate that SB224289 was also able to enhance electrically stimulated [3H]5-HT release from cerebral cortex and hippocampus in the wild-type mouse (Fig. 7). It did so in the absence of exogenously added agonists, indicating that endogenous 5-HT already exerts an inhibiting influence on the stimulated release. Such a tonic inhibition by endogenous 5-HT may explain the observation that agonists were not able to further inhibit the electrically induced [3H]5-HT release in the wild-type mice. In the transgenic mice, basal and electrically stimulated [3H]5-HT release could not be modulated; neither the 5-HT1B agonist (alniditan) nor the 5-HT1B antagonist (SB224289) had an effect on the release from the cerebral cortex or hippocampus slices, which is in contrast to the observations in brain slices of wild-type mice.
The striatum contains a high number of 5-HT1Breceptors, as also shown in the present study. However, a modulation of [3H]5-HT release by 5-HT1B receptors has never been demonstrated in this brain area. We took it along as a control area, and we indeed did not see any effects of 5-HT1B receptor stimulation or blockade on evoked [3H]5-HT release.
A difference in regulatory mechanisms of [3H]5-HT release between wild-type and transgenic mice was also observed in comparing the responses to electrical stimulation in the absence of added drugs. In the hippocampus, a 61% higher response to the first stimulation (S1) was observed in the transgenic compared with wild-type mice (Table 5). This may be due to an inhibitory control present in the wild-type hippocampus, which is either reduced or absent in the transgenic mice; however, in the cerebral cortex, this difference between wild-type and transgenic mice was not observed. The reason for this is not clear.
Together, these observations suggest that the h5-HT1B receptor expressed in mouse brain is not functional in vitro as a 5-HT release-regulating autoreceptor.
In Vivo Functional Responses to RU24969 in Transgenic Mice.
The 5-HT1B agonist RU24969 did not induce hyperlocomotion in the transgenic mice. It is noteworthy that RU24969 displays a 10 times lower affinity for h5-HT1Breceptor (Table 3; pIC50 = 7.29) than for m5-HT1B receptor (Table 3; pIC50 = 8.15). We attempted to overcome this problem by increasing the doses of RU24969. Even at higher doses of RU24969 (20 and 40 mg/kg), no increase in locomotor activity was observed in transgenic animals, but at 40 mg/kg, the hyperlocomotion also was not present in wild-type mice, probably due to nonspecific sedative effects of the drug at a high dosage (unpublished observation). To the best of our knowledge, the mechanism of action by which RU24969 increases locomotor activity is far from clear (Tricklebank et al., 1986). Moreover, RU24969 is the only 5-HT1B receptor agonist that was reported to increase locomotor activity; experiments with various other compounds failed.
RU24969 caused hypothermia in both wild-type and transgenic mice, but the drug was less potent in the latter. However, the maximal effect at 10 mg/kg was comparable in both strains (Fig. 9). In our hands, even at high doses (20 mg/kg s.c.), the 5-HT1B agonists zolmatriptan and naratriptan, which are known to penetrate into the brain (Goadsby and Knight, 1997), did not induce hypothermia in either wild-type and transgenic mice (unpublished observations).
An important observation of the present study is that the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635, and not the selective 5-HT1B receptor antagonist GR127935, blocked the hypothermia induced by RU24969 in wild-type mice (Fig. 10). Based on this observation, it can be concluded that hypothermia is mediated mainly by the 5-HT1A receptors. However, the reduced potency of RU24969 on body temperature observed in transgenic mice could indicate that hypothermia induced by RU24969 may result from an interaction between 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors.
Conclusions.
The present in vitro and in vivo characterization studies demonstrate a complete replacement of the mouse receptor by its human receptor homolog and a functional coupling to G proteins; however, we could not reliably demonstrate downstream functional effects.
The lower level (by 30%) of the 5-HT1B receptor in these “humanized” mice may hamper the functioning of the receptor. The threshold necessary for triggering physiological effects might not be reached. This would be in line with the theory on the existence of a very steep receptor “concentration”-versus-response curve (Koshland, 1998). In addition, the shortage of suitable tools (no potent and selective centrally active h5-HT1Breceptor agonists) complicates the in vivo investigations. The brain-penetrating nonselective 5-HT1B agonist RU24969 displays a 10-fold lower affinity for h5-HT1B receptor than for m5-HT1B receptor.
Other hypotheses can be put forward in trying to explain the problem of restoring functional response in these “humanized” mice. Desensitization of the h5-HT1B receptor expressed in the transgenic mice could occur. However, the 5-HT1B receptor has been expressed in a mouse cell line [LM (tk−) fibroblasts] (Weinshank et al., 1992), and it was found to function normally. A difference in subcellular localization between the h5-HT1B and m5-HT1B receptor resulting from a difference in addressing processes could be an explanation.
Our study shows that the introduction of a human gene into an animal gene results in the expression of the corresponding “humanized” protein, which reveals some functional features; however, full-blown activity of the “humanized” protein is not evident.
Acknowledgments
The expert technical assistance of Monique Berben, Jozef Vermeire, Ilse Lenaerts, Paula te Riele, Lou Stas, and Nathalie Caluwaerts is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to Dr. Mirek Jurzak and Dr. Katty Josson for advice and stimulating discussions.
Footnotes
-
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Pascal Bonaventure, R.W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 3535 General Atomic Court, Suite 100, San Diego, CA. E-mail: pbonave1{at}prius.jnj.com
-
↵1 These two authors contributed equally to this work.
-
↵2 Current address: R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 3535 General Atomic Court, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92122.
-
The experimental Genetics Group, Centrum voor Menselijke Erfelijkheid, Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven was supported by grants from FWO-Vlaanderen, the Interuniversity Attraction Pole program (IUAP) of the Belgian government, and the Biotechnology Program of the Flemish government (IWT/VLAB/COT-008). L.U. was a postdoctoral research fellow of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Research Fund.
- Abbreviations:
- 5-HT
- 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin)
- 5-CT
- 5-carboxamidotryptamine
- 8-OH-DPAT
- 8-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetraline
- ES
- embryonic stem
- GTPγS
- guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)triphosphate
- HYG
- hygromycin
- h5-HT
- human 5-hydroxytryptamine
- ISHH
- in situ hybridization histochemistry
- m5-HT
- murine 5-hydroxytryptamine, PCR, polymerase chain reaction
- PGK
- phosphoglycerate kinase
-
- Received January 26, 1999.
- Accepted March 21, 1999.
- The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics













