Agonist Selective Regulation of G Proteins by Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptors

  1. Michelle Glass and
  2. John K. Northup
  1. Section on Signal Transduction, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Rockville, Maryland

    Abstract

    We have examined the ligand regulation and G protein selectivity of the human cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors by an in situ reconstitution technique directly measuring G protein activation. Membranes from Spodoptera frugiperda cells expressing CB1 and CB2 receptors were chaotrope extracted to denature endogenous GTP-binding proteins. The ability of the receptors to catalyze the GDP-GTP exchange of each G protein was then examined with purified bovine brain Gi and Go. Activation of CB1 receptors produced a high-affinity saturable interaction for both Gi and Go. Agonist stimulation of CB2 receptors also resulted in a high-affinity saturable interaction with Gi. In contrast, CB2 receptors did not interact efficiently with Go. G protein activation was then examined with a diverse group of ligands. For the interaction of CB2receptors with Gi, HU210 was the only compound tested that demonstrated maximal activation. In contrast, WIN55,212 (64%), anandamide (42%), and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) (44%) all initiated submaximal levels of G protein activation. For CB1 receptor-catalyzed activation of Gi, HU210, WIN55,212, and anandamide all elicited maximal activation, whereas Δ9-THC (56 ± 6%) caused only partial Gi activation. In contrast, only HU210 effected maximal CB1 stimulation of Go, with anandamide, WIN55,212, and Δ9-THC all stimulating between 60 and 75% compared with HU210. These data demonstrate that different agonists induce different conformations of the CB1receptor, which in turn can distinguish between different G proteins. Our data thus demonstrate agonist-selective G protein signaling by the CB1 receptor and suggest that therapeutic agents may be designed to regulate individual G protein-signaling pathways selectively.

    Footnotes

    • Send reprint requests to: Dr. John K. Northup, Section on Signal Transduction, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 5 Research Court, Rockville, MD 20850. E-mail:drjohn{at}codon.nih.gov

    • Abbreviations:
      GTPγS
      guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)-triphosphate
      Sf9
      Spodoptera frugiperda cells
      5-HT
      5-hydroxytryptamine
      HU210
      (−)-11-hydroxy-Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol-dimethylheptyl
      WIN55,212
      (R)-(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morphonolinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl)(1-napthalenyl)methanone mesylate
      SR141716A
      N-(peperidino-1-yl)-5-(4-chloropheyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-pyrazole-3-carboxamide, hydrochloride
      SR144528
      N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide
      Δ9-THC
      Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
      MOPS
      4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid
      P2
      postnuclear fraction
      CHO
      Chinese hamster ovary
      • Received June 15, 1999.
      • Accepted September 14, 1999.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents