Structural Determinants of Adenophostin A Activity at Inositol Trisphosphate Receptors

Abstract

Adenophostin A is the most potent known agonist of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) receptors. Ca2+release from permeabilized hepatocytes was 9.9 ± 1.6-fold more sensitive to adenophostin A (EC50, 14.7 ± 2.4 nM) than to InsP3 (145 ± 10 nM), consistent with the greater affinity of adenophostin A for hepatic InsP3receptors (K d = 0.48 ± 0.06 and 3.09 ± 0.33 nM, respectively). Here, we systematically modify the structures of the glucose, ribose, and adenine moieties of adenophostin A and use Ca2+ release and binding assays to define their contributions to high-affinity binding. Progressive trimming of the adenine of adenophostin A reduced potency, but it fell below that of InsP3 only after complete removal of the adenine. Even after substantial modifications of the adenine (to uracil or even unrelated aromatic rings, retaining the β-orientation), the analogs were more potent than InsP3. The only analog with an α-ribosyl linkage had massively decreased potency. The 2′-phosphate on the ribose ring of adenophostin A was essential and optimally active when present on a five-membered ring in a position stereochemically equivalent to its location in adenophostin A.Xylo-adenophostin, where xylose replaces the glucose ring of adenophostin A, was only slightly less potent than adenophostin A, whereas manno-adenophostin (mannose replacing glucose) had similar potency to InsP3. These results are consistent with the relatively minor role of the 3-hydroxyl of InsP3 (the equivalent is absent fromxylo-adenophostin) and greater role of the equatorial 6-hydroxyl (the equivalent is axial inmanno-adenophostin). This is the first comprehensive analysis of all the key structural elements of adenophostin A, and it provides a working model for the design of related high-affinity ligands of InsP3 receptors.

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) receptors are intracellular Ca2+ channels that are expressed in most mammalian cells, where they are largely responsible for mediating the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores evoked by many cell-surface receptors. Functional InsP3 receptors are homo- or hetero-tetrameric assemblies of subunits encoded by three related mammalian genes and their splice variants (Taylor et al., 1999). Each of these assemblies is capable of forming a Ca2+ channel that is regulated by InsP3 and cytosolic Ca2+ (Miyakawa et al., 1999), but the subtypes differ in their distributions and in some aspects of their regulation (for review, see Taylor et al., 1999).

Exhaustive analyses of both naturally occurring and synthetic inositol phosphates and their analogs have so far identified only agonists of InsP3 receptors and none has substantially exceeded the affinity of the naturally occurring ligand InsP3. A few, generally low-affinity, partial agonists have been identified (Marchant et al., 1997b; Wilcox et al., 1998; Murphy et al., 2000), but no antagonists. Indeed, the only effective antagonists of InsP3 binding to its receptor are heparin and decavanadate, neither of which has either high affinity or adequate selectivity for InsP3receptors (Taylor and Richardson, 1991). Caffeine, the xestospongins (Gafni et al., 1997), and 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (Maruyama et al., 1997) also block InsP3 receptors, but at sites distinct from the InsP3-binding site and they too lack either specificity or high affinity (Wilcox et al., 1998;Short and Taylor, 2000).

All known high-affinity agonists of InsP3receptors include structures analogous to the equatorial 4,5-bisphosphate groups and equatorial 6-hydroxyl of InsP3 (Potter and Lampe, 1995; Wilcox et al., 1998) (Fig. 1). The binding site itself lies within the N-terminal portion of each InsP3receptor subunit and includes several basic residues, which are conserved between all three receptor subtypes and are likely to interact with the negatively charged phosphate groups of InsP3 (Yoshikawa et al., 1996). More recent studies have shown that the InsP3-binding site of the type 1 InsP3 receptor is formed by two distinct domains of about 120 and 250 residues linked by a loop that includes the SI splice site (Yoshikawa et al., 1999).

Figure 1
View larger version:
Figure 1

Structures of InsP3 and adenophostin A. The structures are drawn to highlight the means whereby the 3"- and 4"-phosphates, 2"-hydroxyl, and 2′-phosphate of adenophostin A may mimic the crucial 4- and 5-phosphates, 6-hydroxyl, and 1-phosphate of InsP3.

The demonstration that adenophostins, products of the fungusPenicillium brevicompactum, are the most potent known agonists of InsP3 receptors (Takahashi et al., 1994a) introduced fresh opportunities to develop high-affinity ligands of InsP3 receptors. Adenophostins A and B are not metabolized by the enzymes that degrade InsP3, they do not bind to InsP4 receptors (Takahashi et al., 1994a), and in both functional and radioligand binding assays of all three InsP3 receptor subtypes they bind with about 10-fold greater affinity than InsP3(Takahashi et al., 1994b; Hirota et al., 1995; Marchant et al., 1997a;Murphy et al., 1997; Missiaen et al., 1998; Shuto et al., 1998; Bird et al., 1999; Marwood et al., 1999).

The structure of adenophostin A suggests that its glucose 3",4"-bisphosphate structure and adjacent 2"-hydroxyl may mimic the critical 4,5-bisphosphate and 6-hydroxyl of InsP3(Fig. 1). The adenine group may increase the strength of the binding either by improving the positioning of the 2′-phosphate of adenophostin A (analogous to the 1-phosphate of InsP3) or through a more direct interaction with a residue (possibly aromatic) close to the InsP3-binding site of the receptor (Takahashi et al., 1994a; Marchant et al., 1997a; Hotoda et al., 1999). The charge distribution on the phosphate groups of adenophostin A at physiological pH is virtually identical with that in the equivalent phosphate groups of InsP3 (Felemez et al., 1999).

In the present study, we examine the effects of a range of synthetic adenophostin A analogs on45Ca2+ release from the intracellular stores of permeabilized hepatocytes. We provide a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the roles of the ribose and purine rings, the glucose ring, and the stereochemistry of the links between these structures in mediating the high-affinity interaction between adenophostin A and InsP3 receptors.

Experimental Procedures

Materials.

InsP3 (1) was from American Radiolabeled Chemicals Inc. (St. Louis, MO). Thapsigargin was from Alamone Laboratories (Jerusalem, Israel), and ionomycin was from Calbiochem (Nottingham, UK). The analogs of adenophostin A were synthesized as follows: adenophostin A (2) (Marwood et al., 2000a,c); purinophostin (3) and imidophostin (5) (Marwood et al., 2000b); ribophostin (6) (Jenkins et al., 1997); Glc(2′,3,4)P3 (8) (Jenkins and Potter, 1996); 27-29 (Marchant et al., 1997a); furanophostin (7) (Marwood et al., 1999); 17,18, and 26 (Shuto et al., 1998); 9 and10 (Rosenberg et al., 2000); acyclophostin (19) and 25 (Van Straten et al., 1997);20-23 (Rosenberg et al., 2001);xylo-adenophostin (11) andmanno-adenophostin (12) (Marwood et al., 2000c); uridophostin (13); and 4, 14, and30 (Marwood et al., 2000d). The syntheses of 15,16, and furanophostin 3,4-bisphosphorothioate (24, furanophostin-PS2) will be reported elsewhere. The structures of the analogs used, together with their abbreviations, are shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2
View larger version:
Figure 2

Structures of adenophostin A and its analogs.

45Ca2+ Release from the Intracellular Stores of Permeabilized Cells.

Hepatocytes were isolated from the livers of male Wistar rats (200–300 g) as described previously (Marchant et al., 1997a) and permeabilized in Ca2+-free cytosol-like medium (140 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 20 mM PIPES, pH 7.0) by incubation with saponin (10 μg/ml) at 37°C for 8 min. The cells were resuspended (2.2 × 106cells/ml) in cytosol-like medium supplemented with 300 μM CaCl2 (free [Ca2+] = 200 nM), ATP (1.5 mM), creatine phosphate (5 mM), creatine phosphokinase (1 unit/ml), the mitochondrial inhibitorp-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (10 μM), and45CaCl2 (5 μCi/ml). After 5 min at 37°C, during which the intracellular stores loaded to steady state with 45Ca2+, InsP3, adenophostin, A or an analog were added, together with thapisgargin (1 μM) to inhibit further Ca2+ uptake. After a further 1 min, the45Ca2+ contents of the stores were determined by filtration through Whatman GF/C filters followed by washing with ice-cold sucrose (310 mM) and sodium citrate (1 mM). The actively accumulated45Ca2+ content of the stores was defined as that which could be released by ionomycin (10 μM).

[3H]InsP3 Binding to Hepatic Membranes.

Membranes were prepared from perfused rat livers using Percoll-gradient centrifugation as described previously (Beecroft et al., 1999). Briefly, after perfusion in situ with cold buffered saline, the liver was removed, homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer in cold buffered sucrose (25 ml; 250 mM sucrose, 5 mM Hepes, 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4), filtered through gauze, and then centrifuged (25,000g, 10 min). The pellet was resuspended in buffered sucrose (48 ml) containing Percoll (11.8% final v/v; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), recentrifuged (35,000g, 30 min), and the membranes harvested as a fluffy band just beneath the fatty layer at the top of each tube. The membranes in hypo-osmotic medium (1 mM EGTA, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2°C) were centrifuged (48,000g, 10 min) and the pellet resuspended in binding medium (BM: 50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.3, 2°C) at ∼20 mg of protein per millilter, before freezing in liquid nitrogen and storage at −80°C.

For measurements of [3H]InsP3 binding, liver membranes (0.1 mg of protein in 500 μl of BM) were added to [3H]InsP3 (final concentration 1.3–1.8 nM, specific activity 35–60 Ci/mmol) and the appropriate concentration of competing ligand. After 5 min at 2°C, during which equilibrium was attained (Beecroft et al., 1999), bound and free ligand were separated by centrifugation (20,000g, 5 min, 4°C). Total binding was typically 3000 dpm/tube, of which ∼30% was specific.

Analysis.

Equilibrium-competition binding curves were fitted to logistic equations using nonlinear curve-fitting routines (Kaleidagraph; Synergy Software, Reading, PA):Formulawhere B is the amount of [3H]InsP3 bound in the presence of a concentration of the competing ligand, [L]; T and N are the total and nonspecific [3H]InsP3 binding, respectively; n H is the Hill coefficient; and IC50 is the concentration of competing ligand causing 50% displacement of specific [3H]InsP3 binding. TheK d value for each ligand was then calculated from the IC50 value. A similar equation was used to analyze concentration-effect relationships for agonist-evoked Ca2+ mobilization from which the maximal effect, EC50, andn H of each ligand were determined.

The potencies of analogs are expressed relative to the potency of InsP3 determined in exactly parallel experiments (see below). The variance of the potency ratio (with meanK d values of a and b for the two agonists) was calculated from the variances (var) of each using the following equation (Colquhoun, 1971):FormulaAll results are shown as means ± S.E.M.

Results and Discussion

Adenophostin A Is a Potent Agonist of Hepatic InsP3Receptors.

The results shown in Fig.3 confirm previous work (Marchant et al., 1997a) by demonstrating that adenophostin A is a full agonist of hepatic InsP3 receptors with about 10-fold greater affinity than InsP3. In assays of Ca2+ mobilization, adenophostin A was 9.9 ± 1.6-fold more potent than InsP3, and in radioligand binding assays it had 6.4 ± 1.1-fold greater affinity (Table 1). Similar results have been obtained with other tissues (see above). Whereas our previous work (Marchant et al., 1997a) used adenophostin A purified fromP. brevicompactum (Takahashi et al., 1994a), the present results were obtained with synthetic adenophostin A (Marwood et al., 2000a). However, in parallel comparisons synthetic (EC50 = 9.6 ± 1.0 nM,n H = 2.46 ± 0.19, n = 3) and natural (EC50 = 9.2 ± 1.7 nM,n H = 2.99 ± 0.32, n = 3) adenophostin A had indistinguishable effects on Ca2+ release from permeabilized hepatocytes (Marwood et al., 2000a). The similarity is important in providing the justification for subsequent analyses of the effects of synthetic analogs of adenophostin A.

Figure 3
View larger version:
Figure 3

Adenophostin A is a high-affinity full agonist of hepatic InsP3 receptors. A, specific binding of [3H]InsP3 to hepatic membranes is shown in the presence of the indicated concentrations of InsP3 (■) and adenophostin A (▪). B, effects of the indicated concentrations of InsP3 (■) and adenophostin A (▪) on Ca2+release from the intracellular stores of permeabilized hepatocytes are shown as percentages of the InsP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores. Results are means ± S.E.M. of four independent experiments.

Table 1

Effects of adenophostin A and InsP3 on [3H]InsP3 binding and on Ca2+ release from the intracellular stores of permeabilized hepatocytes

All the adenophostin A analogs used in the present study (Fig. 2) that were sufficiently potent to evoke a maximal response at concentrations ≤10 μM released the same fraction of the intracellular stores as a maximal concentration of InsP3 (∼50%). Furthermore, when a maximally effective concentration of any one of the analogs was combined with 10 μM InsP3, the response was no greater than that evoked by the InsP3 alone (data not shown). Although the fraction of the stores released by a maximally effective concentration of InsP3 varied somewhat between experiments (29–55%), when averaged across all the experiments reported here, 50 ± 4% of the actively accumulated45Ca2+ was released by 10 μM InsP3 (Table 1). An indistinguishable response was evoked by a maximal concentration (1 μM) of adenophostin A (Table 1). The responses to InsP3, adenophostin A, and each of the active analogs were positively cooperative (Hill coefficients, n H > 1) (Table2). None of the inactive (18, 23) or very weakly active (10,22, 25, 26) analogs behaved as competitive antagonists: the response to a submaximal concentration of InsP3 (200 nM) was undiminished in the presence of 10 μM of any of these analogs (data not shown).

Table 2

Effects of analogs of adenophostin A on Ca2+ release from the intracellular stores of permeabilized hepatocytes

The results shown in Table 2 summarize experiments performed over a lengthy period during which there were modest variations in the sensitivity of the permeabilized hepatocytes to InsP3 (the EC50 value varied between 90 ± 7 and 201 ± 20 nM). Similar variations were observed in the binding experiments (theK d value for InsP3varied between 2.72 ± 0.88 and 9.65 ± 0.89 nM). To be confident that even the small (although statistically significant) differences in potency (or affinity) observed between some of the analogs were meaningful, we have compared the potency of each analog with the potency of InsP3 measured in exactly parallel experiments. All figures (Figs. 4-8) show results analyzed in this way (i.e., with potencies expressed relative to InsP3), whereas Table 2 shows the actual EC50 values determined for each analog.

Role of the Adenosine Moiety in High-Affinity Binding of Adenophostin A.

Adenophostin A (2, Fig. 1) can be viewed as a phosphorylated glucose glycosidically linked at its 1"-position to an adenosine phosphorylated at the 2′-position. In the first series of experiments, we examined the functional consequences of systematically trimming the adenosine (Fig.4). The results show that as elements of the adenine (2-6, 17) and then of the ribose (7-10) ring were successively removed, there was a progressive decrease in the potency of the analog to evoke Ca2+ mobilization. Analogs (ribophostin,6; furanophostin, 7; and 17) without an adenine moiety were only slightly less potent than InsP3, but after complete removal of the adenine and opening of the five-membered ring [Glc(2′,3,4)P3, 8] the potency fell to 12 ± 1-fold less than that of InsP3. Shortening of the flexible O-C-C chain in 8 by two atoms to give the α-C-glycoside 9 caused a further slight reduction in potency. Interestingly, the isomeric β-C-glycoside 10 was much weaker, despite its apparent resemblance to InsP3. Also, in relation to 6 (ribophostin), some of us have recently reported that elaboration of the methyl group in 6 to propyl or phenylpropyl groups did not appreciably affect potency (De Kort et al., 2000).

Figure 4
View larger version:
Figure 4

Effects of modifying the adenosine moiety of adenophostin A. In this and subsequent figures, the EC50value of each of the analogs is compared with that determined for InsP3 in parallel experiments to give a potency ratio. Ratios >1 denote agonists more potent than InsP3, and ratios <−1 denote agonists less potent than InsP3. The relative potencies, calculated as described under Experimental Procedures, are shown as means ± S.E.M.; the sample sizes are the same as those in Table 2.

The importance of the 2′-phosphate of adenophostin A is apparent from the massive difference in potency between compounds 17 and18. Both ligands lack the adenine of adenophostin A, but17 had only 5.46 ± 0.88-fold lesser potency than InsP3 (Fig. 4), whereas 18, which lacks the 2′-phosphate, was inactive (Fig.5C). These results are consistent with those from radioligand binding analyses of cerebellar membranes where18 bound with ∼300-fold lesser affinity than 17(Shuto et al., 1998), and removal of the 2′-phosphate from adenophostin A reduced affinity by about 100-fold (Takahashi et al., 1994b). There is a similar 100- to 300-fold difference in the affinities of Ins(4,5)P 2 and Ins(1,4,5)P3 for InsP3receptors (Nerou et al., 2001), in keeping with the idea that the 2′-phosphate of adenophostin A mimics the 1-phosphate of Ins(1,4,5)P3 (Fig. 1). The conclusion gains further support from the 159 ± 19-fold lesser potency of25 relative to acyclophostin (19) (Fig. 5B); the major difference between them being the loss of the 2′-phosphate from25 (Table 2).

Figure 5
View larger version:
Figure 5

Effects of modifying the nucleotide motif of adenophostin A and its linkage with the glucose ring. A, modifications to the base. B, flexible analogs. C, effects of replacing the ribose ring of ribophostin (6) with other ring structures. The results are presented in the same format as Fig. 4.

Effects of Modifying the Nucleoside and Its Links with the Glucose Ring.

The effects of modifying the base (adenine) of adenophostin A on biological activity are shown in Fig. 5A. Removal of the amino group from the adenine (to give purinophostin, 3) had a minimal effect. Replacement of the pyrimidine ring of the adenine by a benzene ring (4) reduced potency by 4.0 ± 1.0-fold, and its complete removal reduced the potency of the analog (imidophostin, 5) to almost that of InsP3 (Fig. 5A). Even replacement of the purine moiety (adenine) of adenophostin A with a much smaller pyrimidine (uracil, to give uridophostin, 13) caused the potency to decrease by only 2.31 ± 0.40-fold. Finally, replacement of the entire adenine moiety of adenophostin A with unrelated single (14) or double (15, 16) aromatic rings with a β-C-ribosyl glycosidic linkage produced ligands with activities comparable with that of 4 and significantly greater than that of InsP3 (Fig.5A). As expected, changing the stereochemistry of theC-glycosidic linkage of 14 from β to α (30) massively decreased potency (by 29 ± 11-fold relative to 14, and to 11.8 ± 2.8-fold less than that of InsP3). Hence, although large aromatic groups attached to the 1′-position in a β-orientation improve potency (14 is 10.2 ± 1.9-fold more potent than17), they have the opposite effect when attached in the α-orientation (30 is 2.8 ± 0.7-fold lesspotent than 17). The effect may be caused by steric hindrance around the important 2"-OH and/or the 2′-phosphate group, which may occur with the α- but not the β-oriented rings.

These results indicate that although an adenine attached to the 1′-position of the ribose ring through a β-glycosidic linkage gives the most potent agonist (adenophostin A), even radical changes to the structure of the attached group are tolerated. Each of the analogs with a β-glycosidically linked aromatic system (3-5and 13-16) is significantly more potent than17 in which there is no substitution at the 1′-position.

In the adenophostins, the 2′-phosphate group is separated from the α-glucopyranosyl ring by a three-atom -O-C-C- chain. It seems that some conformational restraint of this chain by incorporation of its two C atoms into a five-membered ring of appropriate stereochemistry (e.g., ribose) is necessary for optimal activity. However, removal of part of the ribose ring to give an apparently flexible structure (acyclophostin, 19) produces an analog with significant activity, providing the adenine is retained. Acyclophostin is unusual in that its efficacy is affected by pH (Beecroft et al., 1999), but under the conditions used to compare analogs in this study, it was only 1.37 ± 0.13-fold less potent than InsP3. Acyclophostin (19) certainly has much greater potency than8 (which lacks the adenine moiety of 19) or25, (which lacks the 2′-phosphate) (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that even when the critical 2′-phosphate is positioned on a flexible link between the adenine and glucose ring, it can still contribute significantly to binding affinity.

Other ring structures can effectively replace the ribose of adenophostin A to give analogs (27-29) (Fig. 2) more potent than 18. However, even the most active of these analogs (28), which is more potent than 8, is still 6.0 ± 0.3-fold less potent than ribophostin (6), where the 2′-phosphate is attached to a ribose ring (Fig. 5C).

It is interesting that analog 26, which is a regioisomer of the relatively potent 17, shows very low activity. The likely reason is that the stereochemical differences between26 and 17 at the positions corresponding to C-2′ and -3′ of adenophostin A result in a different three-dimensional positioning of the 2′-phosphate group at the receptor binding site. Steric hindrance from the differently orientated hydroxymethyl group and five-membered ring may also be involved. Similar factors may account for the low activity of 27, the fructose component of which retains the required stereochemistry, but has a different type of glycosidic linkage to glucose and an extra hydroxymethyl group.

We conclude that of the analogs examined so far, a ribose ring (or close relative) between the pyranosyl and adenine moieties positions the 2′-phosphate most effectively for optimal binding.

Modifications to the Glucose Ring of Adenophostin A.

Whereas InsP3 is based on a myo-inositol ring structure, the analogous 4,5-bisphosphate and 6-hydroxyl groups in adenophostin A are attached to a glucose ring. The functional consequences of modifying this sugar are shown in Fig.6A.

Figure 6
View larger version:
Figure 6

Modifications to the pyranosyl ring (A) and the stereochemistry of the glycosidic linkage (B). The results are presented in the same format as Fig. 4.

Xylo-adenophostin (11), in which the glucose of adenophostin A has been replaced by xylose, was only 1.9 ± 0.6-fold less potent than adenophostin A. The structures of the two analogs differ only in that adenophostin (2) has a CH2OH attached to the 5"-position, which presumably mimics the 3-hydroxyl of InsP3 (Fig.1). The small difference in potency between 2 and11 is therefore consistent with the relatively minor contribution of the 3-hydroxyl of InsP3 to binding (Kozikowski et al., 1993; Nerou et al., 2001).

Manno-adenophostin (12) in which mannose replaces the glucose of adenophostin A, is substantially less potent (12.2 ± 2.3-fold) than the parent compound, although still only 1.51 ± 0.15-fold less potent than InsP3 (Fig. 6A). The potency of 12 is surprising because although it differs from adenophostin only in the orientation of the hydroxyl equivalent to the 6-hydroxyl of InsP3 (Fig. 1), inversion or removal of the 6-hydroxyl in inositol phosphates invariably reduces potency by at least 100-fold (Kozikowski et al., 1993; Wilcox et al., 1994; Nerou et al., 2001). There are no other known high-affinity agonists of InsP3 receptors lacking a hydroxyl equivalent to the equatorial 6-hydroxyl of InsP3. It has been suggested that the 6-OH group of InsP3 may donate an H-bond to the receptor (Kozikowski et al., 1993), an interaction that is presumably disrupted when this group is axial. However, an additional role for the equatorial 6-OH has been proposed, in which it may influence the behavior of the crucial bisphosphate by mediating its interaction with the 1-phosphate (Felemez et al., 2000). Changing the orientation of the 6-OH to axial (InsP3 toepi-InsP3) alters the communication between the 4,5-bisphosphate and 1-phosphate so that they behave effectively as if isolated from one another. This “inframolecular” effect may partly underlie the greatly decreased activity ofepi-InsP3 (Felemez et al., 2000). In adenophostin A, the analogous 3",4"-bisphosphate and 2′-phosphate group are located on separate rings. The effect of modifying the mediating hydroxyl group (2"-OH) may therefore be different from that in InsP3.

Stereochemistry of the O-Glycosidic Linkage.

Because xylo-adenophostin (11) is almost as potent as adenophostin A (2), and xylose-based analogs are both simpler and require fewer chemical steps for their synthesis than glucose-based analogs, we chose to explore the functional consequences of modifying the stereochemistry of the O-glycosidic linkage between the pyranosyl and furanosyl moieties using xylose-based analogs (Fig. 6B).

As shown above, 11 is only 1.9 ± 0.6-fold less potent than 2. Just as furanophostin (7), which lacks the adenine and 4′-CH2OH of adenophostin A, is 22 ± 5-fold less potent than its parent (2), so20, the xylose-based analog of furanophostin, is 17 ± 3-fold less potent than its parent (11). The similarities establish that modifications to the adenosine moiety have similar consequences for glucose- and xylose-based analogs. These results provide the justification for using 20 to explore the functional consequences of changing the stereochemistry of theO-glycosidic linkage between the furanosyl and pyranosyl rings (Fig. 6B).

Changing the stereochemistry of the O-glycosidic linkage to xylose from α (20) to β (23) massively decreased potency, so that 23 was effectively inactive. It is likely that in low-energy conformations of 23, the three-dimensional location of the third phosphate group is very different from that in 20, and that it is therefore unable to mimic the 1-phosphate of InsP3 or the 2′-phosphate of adenophostin A. Analog 22 is stereochemically similar to the glucose-based 26, and they show similar low potency. Unlike 26, however, 22has no hydroxymethyl groups and so it is likely that its weak activity (and by implication that of 26) is again simply attributable to incorrect spatial positioning of its nonvicinal phosphate group. It is interesting that analog 21, which combines the stereochemical changes to the tetrahydrofuranyl ring of 22with a change from an α- to a β-O-glycosidic linkage shows significant activity (19 ± 2-fold weaker than InsP3). Molecular models suggest that the combined effect of the stereochemical changes in 21 is to return the nonvicinal phosphate group to a spatial orientation more closely approaching that in 20 than in 22,23, or 26 (Rosenberg et al., 2001).

Phosphorothioate Modifications to the Phosphate Groups.

Substitution of phosphates by phosphorothioate groups in certain inositol phosphates can give partial agonists (Potter and Lampe, 1995;Murphy et al., 2000), and might thereby provide a step toward the development of antagonists. However, the strategy has so far been limited by the relatively low affinity of these phosphorothioate analogs. It seems that partial agonists of this type can be generated by combining a slight structural perturbation of the InsP3 molecule (particularly at position 3) with phosphorothioate substitution (Potter and Lampe, 1995). Replacement of the 4- and 5-phosphate groups of 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-Ins(1,4,5)P3 with phosphorothioates, for example, produced a partial agonist with an affinity only 10-fold less than InsP3 for type 1 InsP3 receptors (Wilcox et al., 1997). Thus, it seems that higher affinity partial agonists may be created by limiting phosphorothioate substitution to the bisphosphate, leaving the 1-phosphate group, with its ability to enhance affinity, unchanged.

We reasoned that adenophostin analogs such as 7(furanophostin) might be promising candidates for this approach in that they are related to position 3-modified InsP3analogs (hydroxymethyl of glucose replacing 3-hydroxyl of InsP3), and retain InsP3-like affinity for the receptor. Furthermore, their structure (nonvicinal phosphate located on a separate ring) has advantages in terms of synthetic strategy for creating novel ligands with the 2′-phosphate and 3",4"-bisphosphorothioate pattern.

In 24, the two phosphate groups on the glucose ring of furanophostin (7) have been replaced by phosphorothioates to give the first phosphorothioate-containing adenophostin analog, furanophostin-PS2 (Fig. 2). The result is a substantial decrease in potency (5.1 ± 1.3-fold relative to7) (Table 2). The decrease is consistent with similar decreases in potency after phosphorothioate substitution of InsP3: inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphorothioate was 2.8-fold less potent than InsP3 (Taylor et al., 1989). However, maximal concentrations of InsP3and furanophostin-PS2 caused similar amounts of Ca2+ to be released from the intracellular stores (41 ± 2%, n = 3 for each). Furthermore, in both functional and binding assays furanophostin-PS2was about 12-fold less potent than InsP3 (Tables2 and 3). Although rapid measurements of rates of Ca2+ release would be required to unequivocally establish the efficacy of furanophostin-PS2 (Marchant et al., 1997b), our results are certainly consistent with the conclusion that furanophostin-PS2 is a full agonist of hepatic InsP3 receptors. A possible explanation for the unexpectedly high efficacy of furanophostin-PS2may be that its 5"-hydroxymethyl group rather closely mimics the 3-hydroxyl of InsP3 and therefore fails to provide sufficient structural perturbation around the pseudo-3 position to significantly reduce the efficacy of furanophostin-PS2. Future attempts to develop high-affinity ligands with low intrinsic activity may therefore require more substantial modifications to the 5"-position of adenophostin analogs.

Table 3

Binding of selected analogs of adenophostin A to the InsP3receptors of hepatic membranes

Binding of Adenophostin A Analogs to Hepatic InsP3Receptors.

Because InsP3-binding sites are present at low density in hepatocytes and the only available radioligand ([3H]InsP3) has relatively low specific activity, radioligand binding analyses are more demanding and costly than functional assays; they must also be performed in a medium (BM) with high pH and low ionic strength. For these reasons, our radioligand binding analyses of adenophostin A analogs have focused on only the key ligands.

The results are summarized in Table 3. In Fig.7 the affinity of each analog is expressed relative to the affinity of InsP3measured in parallel experiments (under Experimental Procedures); the analogous comparisons from functional assays are shown alongside. Other than acyclophostin (19), which we previously suggested was a partial agonist at pH 8.3 (the pH used for binding assays) but a full agonist at pH7 (Beecroft et al., 1999), there were no substantial disparities between the binding and functional assays. The rank orders of the analogs shown, which included modifications to each of the major elements of adenophostin A, were similar in binding and functional assays (Fig. 7). The results are therefore consistent with each of the analogs (1-3, 5, 6, 12,13, and 24) being a full agonist, differing from adenophostin A only in its affinity for hepatic InsP3 receptors.

Figure 7
View larger version:
Figure 7

Binding of selected adenophostin A analogs to hepatic InsP3 receptors. A, K dvalues of selected analogs were determined using equilibrium competition binding with [3H]InsP3 (Table 3) and the results (■) then expressed relative to the affinity for InsP3 measured in exactly parallel experiments (means ± S.E.M.; under Experimental Procedures). Ratios >1 denote ligands with greater affinities than InsP3, and ratios <−1 denote ligands with affinities less than InsP3. Solid columns (▪) show the relative potencies of the same analogs in assays of 45Ca2+ release.

Conclusions

Adenophostin A is the most potent known agonist of InsP3 receptors. None of the modifications we have made to the structure of adenophostin A has succeeded in either increasing its affinity for InsP3 receptors or in changing its efficacy. We have, however, designed new ligands based upon adenophostin A with potencies higher than that of InsP3. Using both these ligands and simplified analogs of adenophostin A, we have established which structural elements of adenophostin A determine its high affinity for InsP3 receptors (Fig.8) in hepatocytes, which express predominantly type 2 InsP3 receptors (Taylor et al., 1999).

Figure 8
View larger version:
Figure 8

Key features contributing to the high-affinity binding of adenophostin A to InsP3 receptors. The scheme summarizes the key determinants of adenophostin A binding, some of which are inferred from the activities of simplified analogs.

The glucose 3",4"-bisphosphate and adjacent 2"-hydroxyl of adenophostin A are thought to mimic the critical 4,5-bisphosphate and 6-hydroxyl of InsP3 (Fig. 1) (Takahashi et al., 1994a). The 2′-phosphate of adenophostin A is thought to mimic the 1-phosphate of InsP3 and for both ligands removal of this phosphate causes the affinity to decrease by at least 100-fold (Fig. 4) (Shuto et al., 1998). The 3-hydroxyl of InsP3contributes little to binding (Kozikowski et al., 1993; Nerou et al., 2001), and likewise removal of the analogous hydroxyl from adenophostin A (to give xylo-adenophostin, 11) has minimal effect. These results suggest that structure-activity relationships derived from inositol phosphates can be used to predict the activity of adenophostin analogs, at least for some substituents of the pyranosyl ring. However, the unexpectedly high potency ofmanno-adenophostin (12) suggests that the roles of the 2′-hydroxyl of adenophostin A and the 6-hydroxyl of InsP3 are not exactly analogous: this hydroxyl group is clearly more important for InsP3 than adenophostin A binding.

We have explored in detail the contribution of the adenine group to the high-affinity binding of adenophostin A to InsP3receptors. Progressive removal of elements of the adenine cause progressive decreases in binding affinity (Fig. 4), but the adenine can be replaced by completely unrelated aromatic ring systems (13, 14, and 16) with only modest decreases in potency (Fig. 5A). The stereochemistry of the link between the furanosyl ring and the aromatic rings is, however, crucial: β-1′-aromatic substituent (as occurs in adenophostin A) enhances affinity, whereas a similar group in the α-orientation has the opposite effect (Fig. 5A). A phosphate group at the position equivalent to the 1-position of InsP3 (2′ in adenophostin A) is essential (see above) and optimally active when attached to a furanosyl ring (Fig. 5). The stereochemistry of theO-glycosidic link between the pyranosyl and furanosyl rings is crucial, with an α-glycosidic linkage (as occurs in adenophostin A) optimally positioning the pseudo 1-phosphate.

As the most potent stable agonist of InsP3receptors, adenophostin A is already widely used to examine the mechanisms underlying intracellular Ca2+regulation. Our analyses of the key determinants of the high-affinity interaction between adenophostin A and InsP3receptors should facilitate development of further related analogs with properties tailored to meet specific biological requirements.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor J. H. Van Boom (Leiden, the Netherlands) for gifts of acyclophostin and compound 25 and Dr. D. J. Jenkins and H. J. Rosenberg for useful discussions.

Footnotes

  • Send reprint requests to: Dr. C. W. Taylor, Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Rd., Cambridge, CB2 1QJ, UK. E-mail: cwt1000{at}cam.ac.uk

  • This study was supported by program Grants from The Wellcome Trust to C.W.T. (039662) and B.V.L.P. (060554) and by a Wellcome Trust Prize Studentship (to R.D.M.).

  • Abbreviations:
    InsP3
    d-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
    BM
    binding medium
    PIPES
    piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)
    • Received December 6, 2000.
    • Accepted January 29, 2001.

References

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents