Ligand-Binding Residues Integrate Affinity and Efficacy in the NMDA Receptor

  1. Trisha L. Kalbaugh,
  2. Hendrika M. A. VanDongen and
  3. Antonius M. J. VanDongen
  1. Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  1. Address correspondence to:
    Antonius M. J. VanDongen, Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, PO Box 3813, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: vando005{at}mc.duke.edu

Abstract

The interaction of an agonist with its receptor can be characterized by two fundamental properties, affinity and efficacy. Affinity defines how tightly the agonist associates with its receptor, and efficacy measures the ability of the bound ligand to activate the receptor. Although affinity and efficacy are independent properties, the binding and activation processes that they describe are tightly coupled. This strong coupling has complicated the interpretation of concentration-response phenotypes caused by receptor mutations. We present an approach that quantifies the role of individual amino acids in defining affinity and efficacy. This method, which employs partial agonists and covalent modification of introduced cysteines, was applied to the ligand-binding sites of the NMDA receptor. Recent crystallographic structures for glutamate receptor ligand-binding cores allowed identification of residues that are either known or are predicted to be critical for ligand binding in the NR1 and NR2A subunit, respectively. Mutation of amino acids whose sidechains would directly coordinate bound ligands affected both agonist affinity and efficacy. In contrast, positions predicted to stabilize the closed-cleft conformation contributed only to agonist efficacy. The results provide a molecular basis for the tight coupling of agonist binding and receptor activation.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants NS31557 and MH61506 (to A.M.J.V.D.) and MH64282 (to T.L.K.).

  • ABBREVIATIONS: NMDAR, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; LBD, ligand binding domain; NMDA, N-methyl-d-aspartate; MTSEA, (2-aminoethyl-)methanethiosulfonate; GluR, glutamate receptor; DCS, d-cycloserine.

    • Received October 17, 2003.
    • Accepted April 26, 2004.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents