PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Takaharu Tsuda
AU  - Takashi Kusui
AU  - Wei Hou
AU  - Richard V. Benya
AU  - Mark A. Akeson
AU  - Glenn S. Kroog
AU  - James F. Battey
AU  - Robert T. Jensen
TI  - Effect of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Number on Receptor Affinity, Coupling, Degradation, and Modulation
AID  - 10.1124/mol.51.5.721
DP  - 1997 May 01
TA  - Molecular Pharmacology
PG  - 721--732
VI  - 51
IP  - 5
4099  - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/51/5/721.short
4100  - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/51/5/721.full
SO  - Mol Pharmacol1997 May 01; 51
AB  - The relationship between receptor number and agonist-induced intracellular responses has been well studied in receptors coupled to adenylate cyclase; however, for receptors coupled to phospholipase C (PLC), very little is known about the effect of receptor number on receptor-mediated processes. To explore this issue, we investigated the effect of the number of receptors for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) on ligand affinity and on the ability to activate intracellular messengers [PLC, tyrosine phosphorylation of p125 focal adhesion kinase (p125FAK)] and cause receptor modulation (internalization, desensitization, down-regulation) and ligand degradation. Three BALB 3T3 cell lines were made that stably expressed the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) with receptor numbers varying by 280-fold (GRP-R-Low, GRP-R-Med, and GRP-R-Hi). Each cell line had the same affinity for agonist. The efficacy for bombesin to increase [3H]inositol phosphates but not tyrosine phosphorylation of p125FAK correlated well with receptor number. In contrast, the EC50 value for [3H]inositol phosphate generation for bombesin was the same in each cell line. Receptor number did not alter internalization. In the absence of protease inhibitors, there was an inverse correlation between receptor number and receptor down-regulation and desensitization. However, with protease inhibitors present, GRP-R-Med and GRP-R-Hi down-regulated significantly less than the GRP-R-Low. Similarly, GRP-R-Low desensitized significantly more than GRP-R-Med or GRP-R-Hi. GRP-R-Hi caused significantly greater ligand degradation than GRP-R-Low, and protease inhibitors completely inhibited degradation by GRP-R-Low and inhibited degradation by 70% for GRP-R-Hi. In conclusion, we show that for the PLC-coupled GRP-R, receptor number had little or no effect on binding affinity, potency for activating PLC, tyrosine phosphorylation of p125FAK, or extent of receptor internalization. In contrast, receptor number had an effect on ligand degradation, down-regulation, desensitization, and efficacy of PLC activation without altering the efficacy of tyrosine phosphorylation of p125FAK. These results demonstrate that the effect of receptor number differs for the different functions mediated by the GRP receptor and differs from that reported for adenylate cyclase-coupled receptors such as receptors mediating the action of adrenergic agents, secretin, and opioids.