PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - David A. Andersson
AU  - Mikael Adner
AU  - Edward D. Högestätt
AU  - Peter M. Zygmunt
TI  - Mechanisms Underlying Tissue Selectivity of Anandamide and Other Vanilloid Receptor Agonists
AID  - 10.1124/mol.62.3.705
DP  - 2002 Sep 01
TA  - Molecular Pharmacology
PG  - 705--713
VI  - 62
IP  - 3
4099  - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/62/3/705.short
4100  - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/62/3/705.full
SO  - Mol Pharmacol2002 Sep 01; 62
AB  - Anandamide acts as a full vanilloid receptor agonist in many bioassay systems, but it is a weak activator of primary afferents in the airways. To address this discrepancy, we compared the effect of different vanilloid receptor agonists in isolated airways and mesenteric arteries of guinea pig using preparations containing different phenotypes of the capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerve. We found that anandamide is a powerful vasodilator of mesenteric arteries but a weak constrictor of main bronchi. These effects of anandamide are mediated by vanilloid receptors on primary afferents and do not involve cannabinoid receptors. Anandamide also contracts isolated lung strips, an effect caused by the hydrolysis of anandamide and subsequent formation of cyclooxygenase products. Although capsaicin is equally potent in bronchi and mesenteric arteries, anandamide, resiniferatoxin, and particularly olvanil are significantly less potent in bronchi. Competition experiments with the vanilloid receptor antagonist capsazepine did not provide evidence of vanilloid receptor heterogeneity. Arachidonoyl-5-methoxytryptamine (VDM13), an inhibitor of the anandamide membrane transporter, attenuates responses to olvanil and anandamide, but not capsaicin and resiniferatoxin, in mesenteric arteries. VDM13 did not affect responses to these agonists in bronchi, suggesting that the anandamide membrane transporter is absent in this phenotype of the sensory nerve. Computer simulations using an operational model of agonism were consistent, with differences in intrinsic efficacy and receptor content being responsible for the remaining differences in agonist potency between the tissues. This study describes differences between vanilloid receptor agonists regarding tissue selectivity and provides a conceptual framework for developing tissue-selective vanilloid receptor agonists devoid of bronchoconstrictor activity.