PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Niels Decher
AU  - Pradeep Kumar
AU  - Teresa Gonzalez
AU  - Bernard Pirard
AU  - Michael C. Sanguinetti
TI  - Binding Site of a Novel Kv1.5 Blocker: A “Foot in the Door” against Atrial Fibrillation
AID  - 10.1124/mol.106.026203
DP  - 2006 Oct 01
TA  - Molecular Pharmacology
PG  - 1204--1211
VI  - 70
IP  - 4
4099  - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/70/4/1204.short
4100  - http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/70/4/1204.full
SO  - Mol Pharmacol2006 Oct 01; 70
AB  - Kv1.5 channel blockers prolong atrial action potentials and may prevent atrial flutter or fibrillation without affecting ventricular repolarization. Here we characterize the mechanisms of action of 2′-{[2-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-acetylamino]-methyl}-biphenyl-2-carboxylic acid (2-pyridin-3-yl-ethyl)-amide (AVE0118) on Kv1.5 channels heterologously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Whole cell currents in oocytes were recorded using the two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique. AVE0118 blocked Kv1.5 current in oocytes with an IC50 of 5.6 μM. Block was enhanced by higher rates of stimulation, consistent with preferential binding of the drug to the open state of the channel. Ala-scanning mutagenesis of the pore domain of Kv1.5 identified the amino acids Thr479, Thr480, Val505, Ile508, Val512, and Val516 as important residues for block by AVE0118. A homology model of the pore region of Kv1.5 predicts that these six residues face toward the central cavity of the channel. In addition, mutation of two other S6 residues (Ile502 and Leu510) that are predicted to face away from the central cavity also diminished drug block. All these putative drug-binding residues are highly conserved in other Kv channels, explaining our finding that AVE0118 also blocked Kv1.3, Kv2.1, Kv3.1, and Kv4.3 channels with similar potency. Docking of AVE0118 into the inner cavity of a Kv1.5 pore homology model predicted an unusual binding mode. The drug aligned with the inner S6 α-helical domain in a manner predicted to block the putative activation gate. This “foot-in-the-door” binding mode is consistent with the observation that the drug slowed the rate of current deactivation, causing a crossover of tail current traces recorded before and after drug treatment. The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics