Table 1

Effects of mAChR subtype-selective antagonists on IKTMA, IK4AP, and IKACh

Pirenzepine, 10 nMMethoctramine, 20 nM4-DAMP, 2 nMTropicamide, 200 nM
pA/pF
IKTMA
 +50 mVControl13.9  ± 2.112.7  ± 2.711.5  ± 0.69.0  ± 1.1
Drug14.0  ± 2.012.2  ± 2.76.4  ± 0.4** 9.1  ± 1.2
% change1.0  ± 3.5−4.0  ± 0.6−42.8  ± 6.10.5  ± 1.7
 −100 mVControl4.2  ± 0.94.1  ± 1.02.2  ± 0.33.5  ± 0.8
Drug4.3  ± 0.54.2  ± 0.91.1  ± 0.2** 3.8  ± 1.0
% change5.8  ± 8.23.1  ± 4.0−50.9  ± 5.15.2  ± 7.4
(n = 4)(n = 5)(n = 6)(n = 4)
IK4AP
 +50 mVControl6.8  ± 1.57.8  ± 0.98.7  ± 0.27.1  ± 1.0
Drug6.9  ± 1.68.0  ± 0.89.0  ± 0.53.8  ± 0.5**
% change1.5  ± 3.8−3.7  ± 0.97.2  ± 3.4−46.4  ± 3.1
 −100 mVControl3.8  ± 1.13.4  ± 1.03.8  ± 1.52.7  ± 0.3
Drug4.1  ± 1.23.8  ± 1.63.7  ± 1.31.6  ± 0.2***
% change5.9  ± 3.012.9  ± 4.4−0.7  ± 5.1−41.8  ± 4.5
(n = 3)(n = 3)(n = 4)(n = 5)
IKACh
 +50 mVControl7.0  ± 1.06.4  ± 0.65.9  ± 0.96.2  ± 0.5
Drug6.9  ± 1.29.4  ± 1.0** 5.7  ± 0.56.1  ± 0.3
% change−0.2  ± 0.344.8  ± 4.0−3.4  ± 0.5−1.6  ± 1.0
 −100 mVControl11.2  ± 3.09.4  ± 2.110.4  ± 1.39.1  ± 1.8
Drug10.9  ± 4.114.8  ± 1.19.8  ± 3.58.9  ± 2.1
% change−1.0  ± 0.4−57.4  ± 4.7*** −5.2  ± 1.2−2.2  ± 2.2
(n = 3)(n = 6)(n = 3)(n = 3)
  • 1-150  p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001. Student’s t test, compared with control.