Table 2

Comparison of affinities of antagonists for wild-type D2 and D4 receptors and mutant D2 receptors

MutantsN-MethylspiperoneCPPMAClozapine
KDKDD2/KDmutnKIKID2/KImutnKIKID2/KImutn
pM nM nM
D4360  ± 700.230.78  ± 0.281180712.4  ± 0.6232
D279  ± 813920  ± 20016280  ± 3012
D2W90L150  ± 70.53330  ± 202.83106  ± 22.52
D2V91F28  ± 172.829.5  ± 4.09735.7  ± 0.9493
D2L94S300  ± 100.32540  ± 501.76780  ± 200.42
D2F110L230  ± 100.33174  ± 465.34560  ± 1100.52
D2V111M910  ± 400.121650  ± 800.64370  ± 900.82
D2F164A/S167A112  ± 120.72810  ± 1101.14430  ± 900.72
D2L170V/F172C110  ± 130.72750  ± 2001.241650  ± 12500.22
D2F189Y33  ± 232.42340  ± 402.7451  ± 15.52
D2V196C110  ± 100.72550  ± 801.73370  ± 2100.82
D2T392V110  ± 100.72750  ± 601.24280  ± 18012
D2Y408V310  ± 70.32280  ± 103.2460  ± 44.72
D2F411V102  ± 110.82790  ± 2301.23200  ± 801.42

K Ds for N-methylspiperone were determined by fitting data to the equation for homologous competitive binding with ligand depletion as described in Experimental Procedures.K I values for CPPMA and clozapine were calculated from IC50 values with the equation of Cheng and Prusoff (1973). Data are means ± S.E. The three mutants in bold had >3-fold increases in affinity for CPPMA.