GnRH analog | Ki | Fold change | |
---|---|---|---|
Wild-Type | Mutant | ||
nM | |||
GnRH1-a | 6.79 ± 1.08 | 212 ± 40.61-160 | 31.2 |
[Gln8]-GnRH | 923 ± 222 | 1240 ± 227 | 1.35 |
[Glu8]-GnRH | >10 000 | >10 000 | — |
[His5,d-Tyr6]-GnRH | 0.48 ± 0.121-b | 1.36 ± 0.201-150 1-b | 2.83 |
[d-Ala6,N-Me-Leu7,Pro9-NHEt]-GnRH | 0.97 ± 0.35 | 1.55 ± 0.09 | 1.60 |
[d-Trp6,Pro9-NHEt]-GnRH | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.06 | 1.80 |
[d-Trp6,Gln8,Pro9-NHEt]-GnRH | 1.86 ± 0.19 | 1.67 ± 0.43 | 0.82 |
[6,7 γ-lactam]-GnRH | 1.37 ± 0.07 | 4.66 ± 0.361-160 | 3.40 |
GnRH II ([His5,Trp7,Tyr8]-GnRH) | 193.7 ± 28.5 | 213.3 ± 72.4 | 1.10 |
Antagonist 129-62 | 0.86 ± 0.21 | 1.52 ± 0.28 | 1.76 |
Antagonist 26 | 0.80 ± 0.13 | 1.13 ± 0.19 | 1.41 |
Competition binding assays were performed on COS-1 cells transiently transfected with wild type or mutant GnRH receptors, using125I-[His5, d-Tyr6]-GnRH and various concentrations of unlabeled ligands as described underMaterials and Methods. K i values are presented as mean ± S.E. Statistical analyses were performed using pK i values as described under Materials and Methods. The fold change was calculated as the ratio of theK i values of the mutant and wild-type receptors.