Table 1

Binding of nonpeptide antagonists to R, RG, and RO states of the CRF1 receptor in L-CRF1 cell membranes

vs 125I-Sauvagine (RG)vs 125I-Sauvagine + GTPγS (RO)vs [3H]NBI 35965 + GTPγS (R)vs 125I-Astressin + GTPγS (R)
Antagonist LigandpKi% Maximal DisplacementpKi% Maximal DisplacementpKi% Maximal DisplacementpKi% Maximal Displacementα
nM nM nM nM
Antalarmin9.42  ± 0.03101  ± 18.71  ± 0.0892  ± 39.22  ± 0.26101  ± 28.07  ± 0.15a 20  ± 10.63  ± 0.03a
(0.38)(2.0)(0.61)(8.6)
NBI 279149.02  ± 0.06100  ± 18.70  ± 0.18113  ± 138.68  ± 0.0699  ± 28.95  ± 0.06a 28  ± 10.59  ± 0.01a
(0.97)(2.0)(2.1)(1.1)
NBI 359658.84  ± 0.1099  ± 18.33  ± 0.1094  ± 68.74  ± 0.061008.87  ± 0.33a 22  ± 10.65  ± 0.03a
(1.4)(4.6)(1.8)(1.4)
DMP-6968.63  ± 0.11101  ± 18.38  ± 0.08110  ± 38.71  ± 0.0798  ± 28.89  ± 0.22a 32  ± 20.54  ± 0.02a
(2.3)(4.1)(2.0)(1.3)

Displacement of radioligand binding to L-CRF1 cell membranes was measured as described under Materials and Methods. Inhibition of 125I-sauvagine binding provides a measure of ligand affinity for the RG state of the CRF1receptor. Ligand affinity for the R state was measured by displacement of 125I-astressin or [3H]NBI 35965 binding in the presence of 30 μM GTPγS. A third state of the receptor was identified in L-CRF1 cell membranes, which bound agonists with high affinity in a GTPγS-insensitive manner (RO). Ligand affinity for RO was measured by displacement of125I-sauvagine binding with 30 μM GTPγS present. pK i values were obtained by fitting the displacement data to a single affinity-state competition model, followed by conversion of IC50 to K i(Cheng and Prusoff, 1973). [In all cases, a two affinity-state model did not significantly improve the goodness of fit (p > 0.05)]. The K d value used in theK i calculation was 43 pM and 1.4 nM for125I-sauvagine at RG and RO, respectively, 0.56 nM for [3H]NBI 35965, and 70 pM for125I-astressin.

    • a  The affinity of nonpeptide antagonists was determined using a model which assumes allosteric inhibition of125I-astressin binding (the allosteric ternary model, eq.1; see , pK i is equivalent to pK N in eq. 1). This analysis estimates nonpeptide affinity, and the cooperativity between nonpeptide and125I-astressin binding (α). Data are the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3–4).