TABLE 2

Effects of Cavβ3 mutations on 4-AP–induced potentiation of N-type and L-type Ca2+ channels in HEK293 cells

n = 6–8 cells in each group; data are expressed as means ± S.E.M.

MutantMutation SitesN-typeL-typeBasal IBa
% Increase in IBaBasal IBa% Increase in IBa
(3 mM 4-AP)(0.3 mM 4-AP)(1 mM 4-AP)
pApA
Cavβ3 (wild-type)183.9 ± 34.4%786.5 ± 180.2122.5 ± 22.4%250.5 ± 20.8%389.1 ± 91.5
Cavβ2 (wild-type)77.7 ± 22.9%748.1 ± 51.811.1 ± 3.8%46.6 ± 21.4%333.4 ± 13.8
Cavβ3-A1 (M195-M196)MM → AANo effect15.8 ± 8.4 **50.7 ± 5.5% *52.5 ± 8.6% *45.5 ± 13.9 **
Cavβ3-A2 (K198-L200)KAL→ AGA99.8 ± 15.8% *651.7 ± 110.4No effectNo effect645.8 ± 93.0
Cavβ3-A3 (V292-S295)VKVS → AKAANo currentsNo currentsNo currentsNo currentsNo currents
Cavβ3-A4 (V299-L303)VLQRL → ALQAANo effect33.3 ± 13.1 **No currentsNo currentsNo currents
Cavβ3-A5 (L337-N340)LDEN → ADAA66.2 ± 10.5% *42.8 ± 9.2 **No currentsNo currentsNo currents
Cavβ3-A6 (L342-A345)LDDA → ADDGNo currentsNo currents5.13 ± 2.5% **23.8 ± 4.6% **248.2 ± 198.7
Cavβ3-P1 (K134-G148)KARRSGNPSSLSDIG (Cavβ3)71.9 ± 19.6% *661.8 ± 137.915.6 ± 5.6% **54.9 ± 3.5% *583.3 ± 210.4
→RAKQGKFYSSKSGGNSSSSLGDIVPS (Cavβ2)
Cavβ3-P1a (K134-R137)KARR → AAAANo currentsNo currentsNo effectNo effect316.5 ± 93.4
Cavβ3-P1b (S138-P141)SGNP → AAAA18.3 ± 5.1% **138.2 ± 37.9 **No currentsNo currentsNo currents
Cavβ3-P1c (S142-S145)SSLS → AAAA214.5 ± 50.6%690.8 ± 93.0No currentsNo currentsNo currents
Cavβ3-P1d (D146-G148)DIG → AAA45.8 ± 31.3% *722.1 ± 110.514.0 ± 2.8% **52.8 ± 23.5% *289.4 ± 140.4
Cavβ3-P1-D146D → A167.2 ± 35.4%628.8 ± 125.515.0 ± 3.5% **52.5 ± 11.3% *245.1 ± 58.9
Cavβ3-P1-I147I → ANo currentsNo currents55.2 ± 20.8% *64.1 ± 3.5% *307.7 ± 76.2
Cavβ3-P1-G148G → ANo currentsNo currents4.17 ± 1.5% **193.7 ± 2.9%222.8 ± 88.7
Cavβ3-P2 (ins P367)(ins) PNPLLSRT (Cavβ2)60.2 ± 8.3% *750.8 ± 131.820.8 ± 11.3% **78.3 ± 2.3% *625.9 ± 97.5
Cavβ3-P3 (ins G368)(ins) ATST (Cavβ2)No currentsNo currentsNo currentsNo currentsNo currents
Cavβ3-P4 (ins E480)(ins) PVKKSQHRSSSATH (Cavβ2)148.9 ± 20.5%850.4 ± 179.2No effectNo effect598.6 ± 154.3
  • * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, compared with the Cavβ3 wide-type controls (repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test).