Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of folylpolyglutamate hydrolases of mouse liver, kidney, muscle and brain

  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The folylpolyglutamate hydrolase activities of mouse liver, kidney, muscle and brain were examined by incorporation of methylenetetrahydrofolate polyglutamate reaction products into a stable ternary complex with tritiated fluorodeoxyuridylate and L. casei thymidylate synthetase. Complexes were separated electrophoretically on the basis of charge associated with the polyglutamyl moieties to determine distribution of chain lengths throughout the time course of the reaction. Tissue folylpolyglutamate hydrolase activities were allowed to utilize endogenous folylpolyglutamate as substrates by incubating crude tissue extracts at pH 7.4 and pH 4.5. Kidney and muscle contained relatively reactive hydrolases which were capable of generating intermediates of essentially all chain lengths from folylpentaglutamate, the predominant endogenous species. The relatively low activity in brain also gave rise to all possible intermediates. Liver contained a high concentration of methylenetetrahydrofolate but little hydrolase activity. The activity present in liver gave rise to essentially no intermediates but yielded only the monoglutamate form of the cofactor. When purified lysosomal preparations from liver and kidney were allowed to react with synthetic folylpolyglutamates, the same specificity with regard to reaction products was observed as with endogenous substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baugh, C. M. & Krumdieck, C. L., 1971. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 186: 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shin, Y. S., Buehring, K. V. & Stokstad, E. L. R., 1974. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 163: 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brody, T., Shin, Y. S. & Stokstad, E. L. R., 1976. J. Neurochem. 27: 409–413.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reisenauer, A. M., Krumdieck, C. L. & Halsted, C. H., 1977. Science 198: 196–197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jagerstad, M. & Olsson, I. 1979. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 39: 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silink, M. & Rowe, P. B., 1975. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 381: 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffbrand, A. V. & Peters, T. J., 1969. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 192: 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernstein, L. H., Gutstein, S., Weiner, S. & Ezron, G., 1970. Ann. J. Med. 48: 570–579.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaferstein, H. & Jaenicke, L., 1972. Z. Physiol. Chem. 353: 1153–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silink, M., Reddel, R., Bethel, M. & Rowe, P. B., 1975. J. Biol. Chem. 250: 5982–5994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krumdieck, C. L. & Baugh, C. M., 1970. Anal. Biochem. 35: 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Priest, D. G., Happel, K. K. & Doig, M. T., 1980. J. Biochem. Biophys. Met. 3: 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Priest, D. G., Happel, K. K., Mangum, M., Bednarek, J. M., Doig, M. T. & Baugh, C. M., 1981. Anal. Biochem. (in press)

  14. Priest, D. G., Alford, C. W., Batson, K. K. & Doig, M. T., 1980. Anal. Biochem. 103: 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sawant, P. L., Shibko, S., Kumta, U. S. & Tappel, A. L., 1964. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 85: 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sawant, P. L., Desai, I. D. & Tappel, A. L., 1964. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 85: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bradford, M. M., 1976. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kisliuk, R. L., Gaumont, Y. & Baugh, C. M., 1974. J. Biol. Chem. 249: 4100–4103.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McGuire, J. J., Hsieh, P., Coward, J. K. & Bertino, J. R., 1980. J. Biol. Chem. 255: 5776–5788.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leslie, G. I. & Baugh, C. M., 1974. Biochem. 13: 4957–4961.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zamierowski, M. M. & Wagner, C., 1977. J. Biol. Chem. 252: 933–938.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Priest, D.G., Veronee, C.D., Mangum, M. et al. Comparison of folylpolyglutamate hydrolases of mouse liver, kidney, muscle and brain. Mol Cell Biochem 43, 81–87 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00423095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00423095

Keywords

Navigation