Abstract
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a protein family of outstanding pharmaceutical interest. GPCR homology models, based on the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin, have been shown to be valuable tools in the drug-design process. The initial model is often refined by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, a procedure that has been recently discussed controversially. We therefore analyzed MD simulations of bovine rhodopsin in order to identify contacts that could serve as constraints in the simulation of homology models. Additionally, the effect of an N-terminal truncation, the nature of the membrane mimic, the influence of varying protonation states of buried residues and the importance of internal water molecules was analyzed. All simulations were carried out using the program-package GROMACS. While N-terminal truncation negatively influenced the overall protein stability, a stable simulation was possible in both solvent environments. As regards the protonation state of titratable sites, the experimental data could be reproduced by the program UHBD (University of Houston Brownian Dynamics), suggesting its application for studying homology models of GPCRs. A high flexibility was observed for internal water molecules at some sites. Finally, interhelical hydrogen-bonding interactions could be derived, which can now serve as constraints in the simulations of GPCR homology models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GPCR:
-
G-protein coupled receptor
- DPPC:
-
Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine
- POPC:
-
Palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine
- DMPC:
-
Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholin
- RMSD:
-
Root-mean-square deviation (nm)
References
Klabunde T, Hessler G (2002) Chem Bio Chem 3:928–944
Rang H, Dale M, Ritter J, Moore P (2003) Pharmacology, 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London,
Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke CA, Motoshima A, Fox BA, Le Trong I, Teller DC, Okada T, Stenkamp RE, Yamamoto M, Miyano M (2000) Science 289:739–745
Caffrey M (2003) J Struct Biol 142:108–132
Baldwin J, Schertler G, Unger V (1997) J Mol Biol 272:144–164
Bissantz C, Bernard P, Hibert M, Rognan D (2003) Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 50:5–25
Voigtländer U, Raasch A, Tränkle C, Buller S, Ellis J, Mohr K, Jöhren K, Höltje HD (2003) Mol Pharmacol 64:21–31
Bröer B, Gurrath M, Höltje HD (2003) J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:739–754
Anezo C, de Vries AH, Höltje HD, Tieleman DP, Marrink SJ (2003) J Phys Chem 107:9424–9433
Schuler LD, Daura X, van Gunsteren WF (2001) J Comput Chem 22:1205–1218
Chandrasekhar I, Kastenholz M, Lins RD, Oostenbrink C, Schuler LD, Tieleman DP, van Gunsteren WF (2003) Eur Biophys J 32:67–77
Berendsen HJ, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) Comput Phys Commun 91:43–56
Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D (2001) J Mol Model 7:306–317
Horn F, Bettler E, Oliveira L, Campagne F, Cohen FE, Vriend G (2003) Nucleic Acids Res 31:294–297
Piascik MT, Perez DM (2001) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298:403–410
Zhao MM, Hwa J, Perez DM (1996) Mol Pharm 50:1118–1126
Wurch T, Pauwels PJ (2000) J Neurochem 75:1180–1189
Mehler EL, Periole X, Hassan SA, Weinstein H (2002) J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:841–853
Okada T, Sugihara M, Bondar AN, Elstner M, Entel P, Buss V (2004) J Mol Biol 342:571–583
Wymore T, Wong T (1999) Biophys J 76:1199–1212
Tieleman DP, Berendsen HJ, Sansom MS (2001) Biophys J 80:331–346
Trent JO, Wang ZX, Murray JL, Shao W, Tamamura H, Fujll N, Peiper SC (2003) J Biol Chem 278:47136–47144
Crozier PS, Stevens MJ, Forrest LR, Woolf TB (2003) J Mol Biol 333:493–514
Huber T, Botelho AV, Beyer K, Brown MF (2004) Biophys J 86(4):2078–2100
Flohil JA, Vriend G, Berendsen HJC (2002) Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 48:593–604
Fan H, Mark AE (2004) Protein Sci 13:211–220
Teller DC, Okada T, Behnke CA, Palczewski K, Stenkamp RE (2001) Biochemistry 40:7761–7772
INSIGHT II (2000) FDISCOVER/HOMOLOGY, Biosym/MSI, San Diego, USA
Okada T, Fujiyoshi Y, Silow M, Navarro J, Landau EM, Shichida Y (2002) PNAS 99:5982–5987
Essman U, Perela L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG (1995) J Chem Phys 103:8577–8592
Ibragimova GT, Wade RC (1998) Biophys J 74:2906–2911
Tieleman DP, Berendsen HJ (1996) J Chem Phys 105:4871–4880
Department of Biological Sciences, Calgary/Canada, http://moose.bio.ucalgary.ca
Faraldo-Gómez JD, Smith GR, Sansom MS (2002) Eur Biophys J 31:217–227
Briggs JM, Madura JD, Davis ME, Gilson MK, Antosiewicz J, Luty BA, Wade RC, Bagheri B, Ilin A, Tan RC, McCammon JA (1989) UHBD (University of Houston Brownian Dynamics) Release 5.1
Schutz CN, Warshel A (2001) Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 44:400–417
Shapiro DA, Kristiansen K, Kroeze WK, Roth BL (2000) Mol Pharm 58:877–886
Shi L, Simpson MM, Ballesteros JA, Javitch JA (2001) Biochemistry 40/41:12339–12348
Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T (1999) Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 34:17–28
von Itzstein M, Wu WY, Kok GB, Pegg MS, Dyason JC, Jin B, van Phan T, Smythe ML, White HF, Oliver SW (1993) Nature 363:418–423
Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL (2003) Protein Sci 12:2001–2014
Braganza LF, Worcester DL (1986) Biochemistry 25:2591–2596
Egberts E, Marrink SJ, Berendsen HJ (1994) Eur Phys J 22:423–436
Fahmy K, Jager F, Beck M, Zvyaga TA, Sakamar TP, Siebertm F (1993) PNAS 90:10206–10210
Yan EC, Kazmi MA, Ganim Y, Hou JM, Pan D, Chang BS, Sakmar TP, Mathies RA (2003) PNAS 100:9262–9267
Neve KA, Cumbay MG, Thompson KR, Yang R, Buck DC, Watts VJ, Durand CJ, Teeter MM (2001) Mol Pharm 60:373–381
Khare D, Alexander P, Antosiewicz J, Bryan P, Gilson M, Orban J (1997) Biochemistry 36:3580–3589
Noble MA, Gul S, Verma CS, Brocklehurst K (2000) Biochem J 351:723–733
Koehl P, Levitt M (1999) Nat Struct Biol 6:108–111
Acknowledgements
HDH acknowledges financial support from the HPC-Europa transnational access program. We wish to thank Peter Tieleman for making available the DPPC/SOL box to the scientific community via Ref. [33].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlegel, B., Sippl, W. & Höltje, HD. Molecular dynamics simulations of bovine rhodopsin: influence of protonation states and different membrane-mimicking environments. J Mol Model 12, 49–64 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-005-0004-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-005-0004-z