Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 51, Issue 6, 22 March 1996, Pages 779-788
Biochemical Pharmacology

Research paper
Involvement of the M2 muscarinic receptor in contractions of the guinea pig trachea, guinea pig esophagus, and rat fundus

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(95)02396-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The involvement of the M2 muscarinic receptor in contractile responses of the guinea pig trachea, guinea pig esophagus, and rat fundus was investigated. In the standard assay, oxotremorine-M elicited contractions of the trachea with an ec50 value of approximately 73 nM. [[2-[(Diethylamino)methyl]-1-piperidinyl]acetyl]-5,11-dihydro-6H-pyrido[2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one (AF-DX 116) at 1 and 10 μM antagonized these contractions by 2.1- and 9.0-fold increases in the ec50 value for oxotremorine-M. These effects are consistent with antagonism of an M3-mediated contractile response. In subsequent experiments, the M3 receptors were first inactivated selectively by incubation with N-(2-chloroethyl)-4-piperidinyl diphenylacetate (4-DAMP mustard) (40 nM) for 1 hr in the presence of AF-DX 116 (1 μM) followed by extensive washing. In 4-DAMP mustard treated trachea, oxotremorine-M elicited contractions with an ec50 value of 0.31 μM in the presence of histamine (10 μM) and forskolin (4 μM). Under these conditions, AF-DX 116 at 1 and 10 μM antagonized contractions to oxotremorine-M by 8- and 59-fold increases in the ec50, respectively, while para-fluorohexahydrosiladiphenidol (p-F-HHSiD) (0.1 μM) had no effect. These effects are consistent with a contraction being mediated by an M2 receptor. In the guinea pig esophagus and rat fundus, AF-DX 116 and p-F-HHSiD blocked contractions measured under similar conditions with magnitudes intermediate between what would be expected from an M2 and an M3 receptor, suggesting that perhaps both subtypes contribute to the overall contractile response under these conditions. In addition, contractions of the guinea pig trachea measured in the presence of histamine and forskolin were pertussis toxin sensitive. These results indicate that, in the trachea, M2 receptors can dominate the contractile response after a majority of the M3 receptors have been inactivated, whereas in the guinea pig esophagus and rat fundus, M2 receptors may contribute to, but do not play a dominant role in the overall response.

References (51)

  • H Kurose et al.

    Specific uncoupling by islet-activating protein, pertussis toxin, of negative signal transduction via α-adrenergic, cholinergic, and opiate receptors in neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid cells

    J Biol Chem

    (1983)
  • G Lambrecht et al.

    p-Fluoro-hexahydrosila-difenidol: The first M2β-selective muscarinic antagonist

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (1988)
  • AF Roffel et al.

    Characterization of the muscarinic receptor subtypes involved in phosphoinositide metabolism in bovine tracheal smooth muscle

    Br J Pharmacol

    (1990)
  • LM Candell et al.

    Differential coupling of subtypes of the muscarinic receptor to adenylate cyclase and phosphoinositide hydrolysis in the longitudinal muscle of the rat ileum

    Mol Pharmacol

    (1990)
  • CM Yang

    Characterization of muscarinic receptors in dog tracheal smooth muscle cells

    J Auton Pharmacol

    (1991)
  • EA Thomas et al.

    A functional role for the M2 muscarinic receptor in smooth muscle of guinea pig ileum

    Mol Pharmacol

    (1993)
  • EA Thomas et al.

    Pertussis toxin blocks M2 muscarinic receptor-mediated effects on contraction and cyclic AMP in the guinea pig ileum, but not M3-mediated contractions and phosphoinositide hydrolysis

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1994)
  • H Reddy et al.

    Characterization of the interaction between muscarinic M2 receptors and β-adrenoceptor subtypes in guinea-pig isolated ileum

    Br J Pharmacol

    (1995)
  • G Lambrecht et al.

    Pharmacology of hexahydro-difenidol, hexahydro-sila-difenidol, and related selective muscarinic antagonists

    Trends Pharmacol Sci

    (1989)
  • L Noronha-blob et al.

    Muscarinic receptors: Relationships among phosphoinositide breakdown, adenylate cyclase inhibition, in vitro detrusor muscle contractions and in vivo cystometrogram studies in guinea pig bladder

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1989)
  • L Zhang et al.

    Muscarinic receptors in canine colonic circular smooth muscle. I. Coexistence of M2 and M3 subtypes

    Mol Pharmacol

    (1991)
  • CM Yang et al.

    Muscarinic receptor subtypes coupled to generation of different second messengers in isolated tracheal smooth muscle cells

    Br J Pharmacol

    (1991)
  • M Del Tacca et al.

    Differential affinities of AF-DX 116, atropine and pirenzepine for muscarinic receptors in guinea pig gastric fundus, atria and urinary bladder: Might atropine distinguish among muscarinic receptor subtypes?

    Pharmacology

    (1990)
  • Z Li et al.

    Functional and localization of high and low affinity binding sites to muscarinic receptors in longitudinal and circular smooth muscles of human stomach

    Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol

    (1990)
  • RM Eglen et al.

    Comparison of the muscarinic receptors of the guinea-pig oesophageal muscularis mucosae and trachea in vitro

    J Auton Pharmacol

    (1988)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Simo decoction promotes contraction of antral circular smooth muscle mainly via muscarinic M3 receptor

      2012, Journal of Ethnopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, activation of muscarinic M2 receptor contributes to, but do not play a dominant role in SMD-induced contractions. It has been clarified that contractions induced by agonist of muscarinic receptor are not mainly determined by muscarinic M2 receptor (Thomas and Ehlert, 1996). Muscarinic receptor, including muscarinic M1–5 receptors, are widely distributed in stomach smooth muscle (So et al., 2003).

    • In vitro effect of bethanechol and suberyldicholine on regions of guinea pig esophagus

      2012, Journal of Surgical Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite the anatomical differences, muscle cells of the guinea pig and human have been shown to express similar agonist receptors. For example, the muscarinic receptor M3 has been demonstrated as the primary mediator of contractions in both guinea pig and human smooth muscle esophageal cells [14, 15]. The functional assessment of tissue engineered esophageal constructs requires both an understanding of the contractile parameters of native esophagus tissue and a consistent methodology for the stimulation and measurement of muscular contractions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by N.I.H. Grants NS 26511 and NS 30882.

    Recipient of an Advanced Predoctoral Fellowship from the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association Foundation. Present address: Scripps Research Institute, Department of Molecular Biology, M.B. 10, 10666 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037.

    Recipient of a United States Public Health Service Research Career Development Award (NS01396) from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

    View full text